Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: November 8, 2024) |
Title 23 - Highways |
Chapter III - National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation |
Part 1300 - Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs |
Subpart C - National Priority Safety Program and Racial Profiling Data Collection Grants |
§ 1300.22 - State Traffic safety information system improvements grants.
-
§ 1300.22 State Traffic safety information system improvements grantsSafety Information System Improvements Grants.
(a) Purpose. This section establishes criteria, in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 405(c), for grants to States to develop and implement effective programs that improve the timeliness, accuracy, completeness, uniformity, integration, and accessibility of State safety data needed to identify priorities for Federal, State, and local highway and traffic safety programs; evaluate the effectiveness of such efforts; link State data systems, including traffic records and systems that contain medical, roadway, and economic data; improve the compatibility and interoperability of State data systems with national data systems and the data systems of other States, including the National EMS Information System; and enhance the agency's ability to observe and analyze national trends in crash occurrences, rates, outcomes, and circumstances.
(b) Qualification criteria. To qualify for a grant under this section in a fiscal year, a State shall submit as part of its HSP annual grant application the following documentation, in accordance with part 2 of appendix B to this part:
(1) Traffic records coordinating committee (TRCC)Certification. The State shall submit a certification that it has -
(i) At least three meeting dates of the TRCC during the 12 months immediately preceding the application due date;
(ii) Name and title of the State's Traffic Records Coordinator;
(iii) List of TRCC members by name, title, home organization and the core safety database represented, provided that at a minimum, at least one member represents each of the following core safety databases:
(A) Crash;
(B) Citation or adjudication;
(C) Driver;
(D) Emergency medical services or injury surveillance system;
(E) Roadway; and
(F) Vehicle.
(2) State traffic records strategic plan. The State shall submit a Strategic Plan, approved by the TRCC, that -
(i) Describes specific, quantifiable and measurable improvements, as described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, that are(ii) Includes a list of all recommendations from its most recent highway safety dataA functioning traffic records coordinating committee (TRCC) that meets at least three times each year;
(ii) Designated a traffic records coordinating committee coordinator; and
(iii) Established a State traffic records strategic plan, updated annually, that has been approved by the TRCC and describes specific, quantifiable and measurable improvements anticipated in the State's core safety databases, including crash, citation or adjudication, driver, emergency medical services or injury surveillance system, roadway, and vehicle databases;
and
traffic records system assessment;(3)(
iii) Identifies which recommendations identified under paragraph (b)(2)
(ii) of this section the State intends to address in the fiscal year, the countermeasure strategies and planned activities, at the level of detail required under § 1300.11(d), that implement each recommendation, and the performance measures to be used to demonstrate quantifiable and measurable progress; and(iv) Identifies which recommendations identified under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section the State does not intend to address in the fiscal year and explains the reason for not implementing the recommendations.
measuresQuantitative improvement. The State shall demonstrate quantitative improvement in the data attribute of accuracy, completeness, timeliness, uniformity, accessibility or integration of a core database by providing -
(i) A written description of the performance
measure(s) that clearly identifies which performance attribute for which core database the State is relying on to demonstrate progress, using the methodology set forth in the “Model Performance Measures for State Traffic Records Systems” (DOT HS 811 441), as updated; and
(ii) Supporting documentation covering a contiguous 12-month performance period starting no earlier than April 1 of the calendar year prior to the application due date, that demonstrates quantitative improvement when compared to the comparable 12-month baseline period.
4) State highway safety data and traffic records system assessment. The State shall identify the date of the assessment of the State's highway safety data and traffic records system that was conducted or updated within the five years prior to the application due date and that complies with the procedures and methodologies outlined in NHTSA's “Traffic Records Highway Safety Program Advisory” (DOT HS 811 644), as updated.(
(c) Requirement for maintenance of effort. The State shall submit the assurance in part 2 of appendix B that the lead State agency responsible for State traffic safety information system improvements programs shall maintain its aggregate expenditures for State traffic safety information system improvements programs at or above the average level of such expenditures in fiscal years 2014 and 2015c) Award amounts. The amount of a grant awarded to a State in a fiscal year under this section shall be in proportion to the amount the State received under Section 402 for fiscal year 2009.
(d) Use of grant funds. A State may use grant funds awarded under 23 U.S.C. 405(c) only to make data program improvements to core highway safety databases relating to quantifiable, measurable progress improvements in the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, uniformity, accessibility or integration of data in a core highway safety database, including through -
(1) Software or applications to identify, collect, and report data to State and local government agencies, and enter data into State core highway safety databases, including crash, citation or adjudication, driver, emergency medical services or injury surveillance system, roadway, and vehicle data;
(2) Purchasing equipment to improve a process by which data are identified, collated, and reported to State and local government agencies, including technology for use by law enforcement for near-real time, electronic reporting of crash data;
(3) Improving the compatibility and interoperability of the core highway safety databases of the State with national data systems and data systems of other States, including the National EMS Information System;
(4) Enhancing the ability of a State and the Secretary to observe and analyze local, State, and national trends in crash occurrences, rates, outcomes, and circumstances;
(5) Supporting traffic records improvement training and expenditures for law enforcement, emergency medical, judicial, prosecutorial, and traffic records professionals;
(6) Hiring traffic records professionals for the purpose of improving traffic information systems (including a State Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) liaison);
(7) Adoption of the Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria, or providing to the public information regarding why any of those criteria will not be used, if applicable;
(8) Supporting reporting criteria relating to emerging topics, including -
(i) Impaired driving as a result of drug, alcohol, or polysubstance consumption; and
(ii) Advanced technologies present on motor vehicles; and
(9) Conducting research relating to State traffic safety information systems, including developing programs to improve core highway safety databases and processes by which data are identified, collected, reported to State and local government agencies, and entered into State core safety databases.