Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: November 8, 2024) |
Title 40 - Protection of Environment |
Chapter V—Council on Environmental Quality |
SubChapter A—National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Regulations |
Part 1501 - NEPA and Agency Planning |
§ 1501.1 - Purpose.
-
§ 1501.1 NEPA thresholds.
(a) In assessing whether NEPA applies or is otherwise fulfilled, Federal agencies should determine:
(1) Whether the proposed activity or decision is expressly exempt from NEPA under another statute;
(2) Whether compliance with NEPA would clearly and fundamentally conflict with the requirements of another statute;
(3) Whether compliance with NEPA would be inconsistent with Congressional intent expressed in another statute;
(4) Whether the proposed activity or decision is a major Federal action;
(5) Whether the proposed activity or decision, in whole or in part, is a non-discretionary action for which the agency lacks authority to consider environmental effects as part of its decision-making process; and
(6) Whether the proposed action is an action for which another statute's requirements serve the function of agency compliance with the Act.
(b) Federal agencies may make determinations under this section in their agency NEPA procedures (§ 1507.3(d) of this chapter) or on an individual basis, as appropriate.
(2) An agency shall consult with other Federal agencies concerning their concurrence in statutory determinations made under this section where more than one Federal agency administers the statute(1) Federal agencies may seek the Council's assistance in making an individual determination under this section.
Purpose.
The purposes of this part include:
(a) Integrating the NEPA process into agency planning at an early stage to facilitate appropriate consideration of NEPA's policies, promote an efficient process, and reduce delay;
(b) Providing for early engagement in the environmental review process with other agencies, State, Tribal, and local governments, and affected or interested persons, entities, and communities before a decision is made;
(c) Providing for the swift and fair resolution of interagency disputes;
(d) Identifying at an early stage the important environmental issues deserving of study, and deemphasizing unimportant issues, narrowing the scope of the environmental review and enhancing efficiency accordingly; and
(e) Promoting accountability by establishing appropriate deadlines and requiring schedules.