Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: November 8, 2024) |
Title 40 - Protection of Environment |
Chapter I - Environmental Protection Agency |
SubChapter C - Air Programs |
Part 52 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans |
Subpart D - Arizona |
§ 52.124 - Part D disapproval.
-
§ 52.124 Part D disapproval.
(a) The following portions of the Arizona SIP are disapproved because they do not meet the requirements of Part D of the Clean Air Act.
(1) The attainment demonstration, conformity and contingency portions of the 1987 Maricopa Association of Governments Carbon Monoxide Plan and 1988 Addendum.
(2) [Reserved]
(b) The following Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) determinations are disapproved because they do not meet the requirements of Part D of the Clean Air Act.
(1) [Reserved]
(2) Maricopa County Air Quality Department.
(i) RACT determinations for major sources of NOX, and CTG source categories for Aerospace Coating and Industrial Adhesives (“National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories: Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework” (59 FR 29216), “Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating Operations at Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Operations” (EPA-453/R-97-004), and “Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives” (EPA-453/R-08-005)), in the submittal titled “Analysis of Reasonably Available Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) State Implementation Plan (RACT SIP),” dated December 5, 2016, as adopted on May 24, 2017 and submitted on June 22, 2017.
(ii) [Reserved]
(c) The following portions of the “Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision: Hayden Sulfur Dioxide Nonattainment Area for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS” are disapproved because they do not meet the requirements of Part D of the Clean Air Act:
(1) Attainment demonstration,
(2) Reasonably available control measures/reasonably available control technology,
(3) Enforceable emission limitations,
(4) Reasonable further progress, and
(5) Contingency measures.
[56 FR 5478, Feb. 11, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 41864, Aug. 4, 1997; 63 FR 41350, Aug. 3, 1998; 65 FR 36358, June 8, 2000; 67 FR 48739, July 25, 2002; 84 FR 39201, Aug. 9, 2019; 85 FR 71553, Nov. 10, 2020; 86 FR 976, Jan. 7, 2021; 86 FR 46989, Aug. 23, 2021; 87 FR 80468, Dec. 30, 2022; 88 FR 7881, Feb. 7, 2023]