![]() |
Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: July 5, 2024) |
![]() |
Title 20 - Employees' Benefits |
![]() |
Chapter V - Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor |
![]() |
Part 641 - Provisions Governing the Senior Community Service Employment Program |
![]() |
Subpart G - Performance Accountability |
§ 641.720 - How will the Department and grantees initially determine and then adjust expected levels of the core performance measures?
-
§ 641.720 How will the Department and grantees initially determine and then adjust expected levels of performance for the core performance measures?
(4)(a) Initial agreementFirst 2 years. Before the beginning of each Program Year, the Department and each grantee will undertake to agree upon expected the first program year of the grant, each grantee must reach agreement with the Department on levels of performance for each core indicator, except as provided in paragraph (b) of measure listed in § 641.730.
(1) As a first step in this process, the Department proposes a performance level for each core indicator, taking into account any statutory performance requirements, the need to promote continuous improvement in the program overall and in each grantee, the grantee's past performance, and the statutory adjustment factors articulated in paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) A grantee may request a revision to the Department's initial performance level goal determination. The request must be based on data that supports the revision request. The data supplied by the grantee at this stage may concern the statutory adjustment factors articulated in paragraph (b) of this section, but is not limited to those factors; it is permissible for a grantee to supply data on “other appropriate factors as determined by the Secretary.” (OAA § 513(a)(2)(C)).
(3) The Department may revise the performance level goal in response to the data provided. The Department then sets the expected levels of performance for the core indicators. At this point, agreement is reached by the parties and funds may be awarded. If a grantee does not agree with the offered expected level of performance, agreement is not reached and no funds may be awarded. A grantee may submit comments to the Department about the grantee's satisfaction with the expected levels of performance.
700 for each of the first 2 program years covered by the grant agreement. In reaching the agreement, the grantee and the Department must take into account the expected levels of performance proposed by the grantee and the factors described in paragraph (c) of this section.
The levels agreed to will be considered the expected levels of performance for the grantee for such program years. Funds may not be awarded under the grant until such agreement is reached. At the conclusion of negotiations concerning the performance levels with all grantees, the Department will make available for public review the final negotiated expected levels of performance for each grantee, including any comments submitted by the grantee regarding the grantee's satisfaction with the negotiated levels.
(5)(b) Third and fourth year. Each grantee must reach agreement with the Department prior to the third program year covered by the grant agreement, on levels of performance for each measure listed in § 641.700, for each of the third and fourth program years so covered. In reaching the agreement, the grantee and the Department must take into account the expected levels of performance proposed by the grantee and the factors described in paragraph (c) of this section. The levels agreed to will be considered to be the expected levels of performance for the grantee for such program years. Funds may not be awarded under the grant until such agreement is reached.
level negotiationsAt the conclusion of negotiations concerning the performance
aboutlevels with all grantees, the Department will make available for public review the final negotiated expected levels of performance for each grantee, including any comments submitted by the grantee
regarding the grantee's satisfaction with the negotiated levels.
6) The minimum percentage for the expected level of performance for the entry into unsubsidized employment core indicator is:(
(i) 21 percent for Program Year 2007;
(ii) 22 percent for Program Year 2008;
(iii) 23 percent for Program Year 2009;
(iv) 24 percent for Program Year 2010; and
(v) 25 percent for Program Year 2011.
(b) Adjustment during the Program Year. After the Department and grantees reach agreement on the core indicator levels, those levels may only be revised in response to a request from a grantee based on data supporting one or more of the following statutory adjustment factors:
(1) High rates of unemployment or of poverty or of participation in the program of block grants to States for temporary assistance for needy families established under part A of title IV of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), in the areas served by a grantee, relative to other areas of the State involved or Nation.
(2) Significant downturns in the economy of the areas served by the grantee or in the national economy.
(3) Significant numbers or proportions of participants with one or more barriers to employment, including individuals described in § 518(a)(3)(B)(ii) or (b)(2) of the 2006 OAA (most-in-need), served by a grantee relative to such numbers or proportions for grantees serving other areas of the State or Nation.
(5) Limited economies of scale for the provision of community service employment and other authorized activities in the areas served by the grantee(4) Changes in Federal, State, or local minimum wage requirements.
c) Factors. In reaching the agreements described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, each grantee and the Department must:
(1) Take into account how the levels involved compare with the expected levels of performance established for other grantees;
(2) Ensure that the levels involved are adjusted, using an objective statistical model based on the model established by the Secretary of Labor with the Secretary of Education in accordance with sec. 116(b)(3)(A)(viii) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3141(b)(3)(A)(viii)); and
(3) Take into account the extent to which the levels involved promote continuous improvement in performance accountability on the core measures and ensure optimal return on the investment of Federal funds.
(d) Adjustments based on economic conditions and individuals served during the program year. The Department will, in accordance with the objective statistical model developed pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, adjust the expected levels of performance for a program year for grantees to reflect the actual economic conditions and characteristics of participants in the corresponding projects during such program year.