Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: October 10, 2024) |
Title 41 - Public Contracts and Property Management |
Subtitle F - Federal Travel Regulation System |
Chapter 302 - Relocation Allowances |
SubChapter D - Transportation and Storage of Property |
Part 302-9 - Allowances for Transportation and Emergency or Temporary Storage of a Privately Owned Vehicle |
Subpart G - Agency Responsibilities |
§ 302-9.606 - What must we consider in determining whether transportation of a POV within CONUS is cost effective?
-
§ 302-9.606 What must we consider in determining whether transportation of a POV within CONUS is cost effective?
When determining whether transportation of a POV within CONUS is cost effective, you must consider the:
(a) Cost of traveling by POV;
(b) Cost of transporting the POV;
(c) Cost of travel if the POV is transported;
(d) Productivity benefit you derive from the employee's accelerated arrival at the new official station; and
(e) The POV is in operating order and legally titled and tagged for driving; and
(f) The distance that the POV is to be shipped is greater than 600 miles or more. An exception to the 600-mile distance requirement may be made for alternative fuel vehicle range capability and fueling availability limitations.
[FTR Amdt. 98, 66 FR 58196, Nov. 20, 2001. Redesignated and amended by FTR Amdt. 2011-01, 76 FR 18342, Apr. 1, 2011 and further redesignated by FTR Amdt. 2011-06, 76 FR 71890, Nov. 21, 2011; FTR Case 2022-03, 89 FR 20860, Mar. 26, 2024]