§ 1552.215-71 - Evaluation factors for award.

Link to an amendment published at 80 FR 20170, Apr. 15, 2015.

As prescribed in 1515.209(a), insert one of the following provisions.

Evaluation Factors for Award (AUG 1999)

(a) The Government will make award to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government cost or other factors considered. For this solicitation, all evaluation factors other than cost or price when combined are significantly more important than cost or price.

(b) Evaluation factors and significant subfactors to determine quality of product or service:

 

 

(End of provision)

Evaluation Factors for Award (AUG 1999)—Alternate I (AUG 2000)

(a) The Government will make award to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government cost or other factors considered. For this solicitation, all evaluation factors other than cost or price when combined are significantly less important than cost or price.

(b) Evaluation factors and significant subfactors to determine quality of product or service:

 

(End of provision)

 

Evaluation Factors for Award (AUG 1999)—Alternate II (AUG 2000)

(a) The Government will make award to the responsible offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the Government cost or other factors considered. For this solicitation, all evaluation factors other than cost or price when combined are approximately equal to cost or price.

(b) Evaluation factors and significant subfactors to determine the quality of product or service:

 

 

(End of provision)

Evaluation Factors for Award (AUG 1999)—Alternate III (AUG 2000)

(a) The Government will make award to the offeror with the lowest-evaluated cost or price, whose proposal meets or exceeds the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. In the event that there are two or more technically acceptable, equal price (cost) offers, the Government will consider socioeconomic, environmental and other similar factors, as listed below in descending order of importance:

 

 

(b) Factors and significant subfactors for technical acceptability evaluation:

 

 

(c) Factors for past performance evaluation (optional):

 

 

(End of provision)

[64 FR 47415, Aug. 31, 1999]