Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: November 8, 2024) |
Title 48 - Federal Acquisition Regulations System |
Chapter 29 - Department of Labor |
SubChapter B - Acquisition Planning |
Part 3509 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS |
Subpart 3509.4 - Debarment, Suspension and Ineligibility |
§ 3509.406-3 - Procedures.
-
(a)
Investigation and referral. (1)(i) Any Commission official or employee who suspects or has knowledge of any conduct, statement, act, or omission of, or attributable to, a Commission contractor or a potential Commission contractor which could justify debarment under FAR subpart 9.4 or this subpart shall immediately report this information to the Commission General Counsel (hereinafter “GC”) or to the appropriate contracting officer.
(ii) Any Commission official or employee who suspects or has knowledge that a debarred individual or company has reestablished itself under a new name shall immediately report this information to the GC or to the appropriate contracting officer.
(2) When the GC receives such information he shall refer the matter to the appropriate contracting officer for investigation and shall notify the PE and the pertinent HCA. When the contracting officer receives such information he shall notify the PE and the pertinent HCA.
(3) The contracting officer shall, in coordination with the pertinent HCA, promptly investigate the matter, assemble all relevant information and prepare a written report containing all available evidentiary material, including copies of indictments and conviction notices when applicable, and the names of the owners and officers, as well as any affiliates, of the contractor in question. The written report shall include a recommendation whether a debarment action should be commenced and, if so, shall identify the causes for debarment, see FAR 9.406-2 and 3509.406-2 of this subpart, and identify each company and individual, including divisions of companies and affiliates, which the contracting officer recommends should be specifically named in the action.
(4) The contracting officer shall submit his report to the pertinent HCA and a copy thereof to the PE and the GC. The HCA shall study the report and promptly advise the PE, in writing, whether or not he concurs in the contracting officer's recommendation and shall explain the reasons for his concurrence or nonconcurrence.
(5) The PE shall study the contracting officer's report and the recommendation of the HCA. If the HCA and the PE agree that a debarment action should not be commenced, the PE shall so inform the debarring official and shall prepare a memorandum for record describing and closing the matter. If, however, either the HCA or the PE recommend that a debarment action should be commenced, the PE shall forward the contracting officer's report to the debarring official, together with the recommendation of the HCA as well as the PE's own written recommendation.
(b)
Decisionmaking process. (1) If the debarring official, after reviewing the contracting officer's report and the recommendations of the HCA and the PE, considering fully the provisions of FAR 9.402 and 9.406-1(a), and consulting with the GC, determines there is a reasonable basis to commence a debarment action, the debarring official shall instruct the PE to
sign and send to each specifically named company, individual or affiliate to which the action is to apply, via certified mail, return receipt requested, either: (i) An informal notice of the Commission's intention to propose debarment,
see 3509.406-3(b)(2) of this subpart; or(ii) A formal notice of the Commission's proposal to debar under FAR 9.406-3(c).
(2) An informal notice of the Commission's intention to propose debarment shall advise the addressee, in writing, of the following:
(i) The issuance under FAR 9.406-3(c) of a formal notice of proposal to debar the addressee is seriously being considered by the Commission;
(ii) The basic factual reasons for the contemplated debarment;
(iii) The causes relied upon under FAR 9.406-2 and 3509.406-2 of this subpart;
(iv) The Commission's procedures governing the debarment process;
(v) The addressee's right to reply to the PE in writing within 21 calendar days of receipt of the informal notice, and show cause why the Commission should not issue, to the addressee, a formal notice of proposal to debar under FAR 9.406-3(c) for the reasons and causes cited by the Commission;
(vi) That, if the PE does not receive a reply from the addressee to the informal notice within 21 calendar days of the addressee's receipt of the informal notice, the Commission will issue to the addressee a formal notice of proposal to debar;
(vii) The effect of the issuance of a formal notice of proposal to debar;
(viii) The potential effect of an actual debarment; and
(ix) That, while the Commission will carefully consider the content of a timely reply to the informal notice, the Commission reserves the right to issue a formal notice of proposal to debar without additional discussion or correspondence.
(3) The PE shall study the timely reply of an addressee to an informal notice and shall forward the reply to the GC and the debarring official with the PE's evaluation and recommendation.
(4) If, after reviewing a timely reply to an informal notice, as well as the views of the PE and the GC, the debarring official determines, considering fully the provisions of FAR 9.402 and 9.406-1(a), that a formal debarment action should commence, the debarring official shall instruct the PE to sign and send a formal notice of proposal to debar to the addressee.
(c)
Notice of proposal to debar. In addition to the matters listed at FAR 9.406-3(c), a formal notice of proposal to debar shall advise the contractor and any specifically named individual or affiliate of the specific, fundamental allegations of material fact supporting the proposed debarment.(d)
Debarring official's decision. (1) A submission in opposition to the Commission's formal notice of proposal to debar presented by a contractor, or any named individual or affiliate, shall include information and argument in opposition to the proposed debarment, including any additional specific information or documents that raise a genuine dispute over material facts. The submission shall be addressed to the PE.
(2) If a timely submission in opposition to a formal notice of proposal to debar is not presented by a named contractor, individual or affiliate to whom a formal notice was sent, the PE shall, with respect only to each such contractor, individual or affiliate that failed to present a timely submission, study all the information in the administrative record and shall forward the entire record to the debarring official with an evaluation and recommendation whether to debar the nonresponding contractor, individual or affiliate and, if so, for what period of time.
(3) If a timely submission in opposition to a formal notice of proposal to debar is submitted in actions based upon a conviction or civil judgment, the PE shall evaluate all the information in the administrative record, including the submission in opposition, and shall forward these materials to the debarring official with a recommendation whether to debar and, if so, for what period of time.
(4)(i) If a timely submission in opposition to a formal notice of proposal to debar is presented in actions not based
upon a conviction or civil judgment, the PE shall evaluate the formal notice of proposal to debar and the submission in opposition and shall determine, with the advice of the GC, if the submission raises a genuine dispute over any facts material to the proposed debarment. If it does not, the PE shall forward the entire administrative record, including the submission in opposition, to the debarring official with an evaluation and a recommendation whether to debar and, if so, for what period of time. (ii) If, however, the PE determines, in consultation with the GC, that a timely submission in opposition to a formal notice of proposal to debar in actions not based upon a conviction or civil judgment raises a genuine dispute over any fact material to the proposed debarment, the PE shall so advise the contractor, named individual or affiliate, and shall inquire whether a fact-finding hearing is desired. If a fact-finding hearing is not requested by the contractor, named individual or affiliate, the PE shall forward the entire administrative record, including the submission in opposition, to the debarring official with an evaluation and a recommendation whether to debar and, if so, for what period of time.
(iii) If a fact-finding hearing is requested, the PE shall appoint a fact-finding official to whom all matters involving disputed material facts shall be referred. The PE will provide the fact-finding official with a copy of the entire administrative record including the submission in opposition. The fact-finding official shall study the Commission's notice(s) of proposal to debar and the submission(s) in opposition, and shall identify specifically the material facts in genuine dispute and so advise the pertinent contractor, named individual or affiliate, as well as the Commission's designated advocate in the Office of General Counsel. A fact-finding hearing shall be scheduled and conducted by the fact-finding official, and shall take place in a Commission facility in Panama unless the fact-finding official determines that fundamental fairness compels the use of another location. The rules governing the fact-finding hearing shall be established by the fact-finding official but shall conform fully with FAR 9.406-3(b)(2) and (d)(2) and (3).
(5) The fact-finding official shall present written findings of fact and the transcribed record of the hearing, if made, to the debarring official within 21 calendar days from his receipt of the transcript or from the final day of the hearing if no transcript is ordered. The findings shall resolve each material fact previously determined to be in genuine dispute based on a preponderance of the evidence presented.
(6) Upon receiving the complete administrative record and the evaluation and recommendation of the PE or, if there was a fact-finding hearing, upon receiving the hearing record and the findings of fact of the fact-finding official and the evaluation and recommendation of the PE, the debarring official shall, considering fully the provisions of FAR 9.402 and 9.406-1(a), make a final decision whether to impose debarment. If debarment is chosen, the debarring official shall also determine the period of debarment.
(e)
Notice of debarring official's decision. The debarring official shall promptly notify the contractor and any named individual or affiliate of the final decision in writing by certified mail, return receipt requested.