![]() |
Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: July 5, 2024) |
![]() |
Title 7 - Agriculture |
![]() |
Subtitle B - Regulations of the Department of Agriculture |
![]() |
Chapter XXX - Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Department of Agriculture |
![]() |
Part 3052 - AUDITS OF STATES, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS |
![]() |
Subpart E - Auditors |
§ 3052.530 - Criteria for a low-risk auditee.
-
An auditee which meets all of the following conditions for each of the preceding two years (or, in the case of biennial audits, preceding two audit periods) shall qualify as a low-risk auditee and be eligible for reduced audit coverage in accordance with §3052.520:
(a) Single audits were performed on an annual basis in accordance with the provisions of this part. A non-Federal entity that has biennial audits does not qualify as a low-risk auditee, unless agreed to in advance by the cognizant or oversight agency for audit.
(b) The auditor's opinions on the financial statements and the schedule of expenditures of Federal awards were unqualified. However, the cognizant or oversight agency for audit may judge that an opinion qualification does not affect the management of Federal awards and provide a waiver.
(c) There were no deficiencies in internal control which were identified as material weaknesses under the requirements of GAGAS. However, the cognizant or oversight agency for audit may judge that any identified material weaknesses do not affect the management of Federal awards and provide a waiver.
(d) None of the Federal programs had audit findings from any of the following in either of the preceding two years (or, in the case of biennial audits, preceding two audit periods) in which they were classified as Type A programs:
(1) Internal control deficiencies which were identified as material weaknesses;
(2) Noncompliance with the provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements which have a material effect on the Type A program; or
(3) Known or likely questioned costs that exceed five percent of the total Federal awards expended for a Type A program during the year.