Code of Federal Regulations (Last Updated: October 10, 2024) |
Title 7 - Agriculture |
Subtitle B - Regulations of the Department of Agriculture |
Chapter XXXIV - National Institute of Food and Agriculture |
Part 3400 - Special Research Grants Program |
Subpart B - Scientific Peer Review of Research Grant Applications |
§ 3400.15 - Review criteria.
-
§ 3400.15 Review criteria.
(a) Subject to the varying conditions and needs of States, Federal funded agricultural research supported under these provisions shall be designed to, among other things, accomplish one or more of the following purposes:
(1) Continue to satisfy human food and fiber needs;
(2) Enhance the long-term viability and competitiveness of the food production and agricultural system of the United States within the global economy;
(3) Expand economic opportunities in rural America and enhance the quality of life for farmers, rural citizens, and society as a whole;
(4) Improve the productivity of the American agricultural system and develop new agricultural crops and new uses for agricultural commodities;
(5) Develop information and systems to enhance the environment and the natural resource base upon which a sustainable agricultural economy depends; or
(6) Enhance human health.
In carrying out its review under § 3400.14, the peer review group will use the following form upon which the evaluation criteria to be used are enumerated, unless pursuant to § 3400.5(a), different evaluation criteria are specified in the annual solicitation of proposals for a particular program.
Peer Panel Scoring Form
Proposal Identification No.
Institution and Project Title
I. Basic Requirement:
Proposal falls within guidelines? __________ Yes __________ No. If no, explain why proposal does not meet guidelines under comment section of this form.
II. Selection Criteria:
Score 1-10 Weight factor Score X weight factor Comments 1. Overall scientific and technical quality of proposal 10 2. Scientific and technical quality of the approach 10 3. Relevance and importance of proposed research to solution of specific areas of inquiry 6 4. Feasibility of attaining objectives; adequacy of professional training and experience, facilities and equipment 5 Score
Summary Comments
(b) Proposals satisfactorily meeting the guidelines will be evaluated and scored by the peer review panel for each criterion utilizing a scale of 1 through 10. A score of one (1) will be considered low and a score of ten (10) will be considered high for each selection criterion. A weighted factor is used for each criterion.