95-11498. Acid Rain Program: Permits Regulation General Provisions and Continuous Emission Monitoring Rule Technical Revisions  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 17, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 26510-26558]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-11498]
    
    
    
    
    [[Page 26509]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part III
    
    
    
    
    
    Environmental Protection Agency
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    40 CFR Part 9, et al.
    
    
    
    Acid Rain Program; Final, Proposed and Interim Rules
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 17, 1995 / Rules 
    and Regulations 
    [[Page 26510]] 
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Parts 9, 72, and 75
    
    [FRL-5203-3]
    
    
    Acid Rain Program: Permits Regulation General Provisions and 
    Continuous Emission Monitoring Rule Technical Revisions
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Title IV of the Clean Air Act (the Act), as amended by the 
    Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, authorizes the Environmental 
    Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) to establish the Acid Rain Program. 
    The program sets emissions limitations to reduce acidic deposition and 
    its serious, adverse effects on natural resources, ecosystems, 
    materials, visibility, and public health. On January 11, 1993, the 
    Agency promulgated final rules under title IV. Several parties filed 
    petitions for review of the rules. On April 17, 1995, the EPA and the 
    parties signed a settlement agreement addressing continuous emission 
    monitoring (CEM) issues.
        This direct final rule would amend the Continuous Emission 
    Monitoring (CEM) provisions and the General Provisions of the Acid Rain 
    Program for the purpose of making the implementation of the program 
    simpler, streamlined, and more efficient for both the EPA and industry. 
    The rule amendment is being issued as a direct final rule because the 
    corrections are technical in nature and address various implementation 
    issues without major changes in policy. Furthermore, the rule 
    amendments are consistent with the April 17, 1995 settlement agreement. 
    Therefore, EPA believes these amendments are noncontroversial and has 
    provided for the amendments to be effective 60 days after publication 
    in the Federal Register.
    
    DATES: Effective Dates. This final rule will be effective July 17, 
    1995. However, if significant adverse comments on portions of the rule 
    are received by June 16, 1995, then the effective date of those 
    provisions will be delayed, EPA will withdraw those portions of the 
    rule, and timely notice will be published in the Federal Register. 
    Sections 75.50, 75.51 and 75.52; redesignated section 2.4.3.1 of 
    appendix D of part 75; and sections 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, 4.4.3, 5.3. 
    and 5.4 of appendix F of part 75 are effective through December 31, 
    1995. The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulation is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of July 17, 1995.
        Compliance Dates. Information on compliance dates is in the 
    Supplementary Information section of this preamble and in appendix J of 
    part 75.
    
    ADDRESSES: Any written comments must be identified with Docket No. A-
    94-16, must be identified as comments on the direct final rule and 
    companion proposal, and must be submitted in duplicate to: EPA Air 
    Docket (6102), Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW, 
    Washington, DC 20460. The docket is available for public inspection and 
    copying between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the 
    address given above. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying. A 
    detailed rationale for the revisions is set forth in the technical 
    support document for the direct final rule, which can be obtained by 
    writing to the Air Docket at the address given above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Sheppard, Acid Rain Division 
    (6204J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street SW, 
    Washington, DC 20460, telephone number (202) 233-9180.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA is revising the CEM provisions as a 
    direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views these 
    revisions as noncontroversial and anticipates no significant adverse 
    comments. The EPA is also publishing a companion proposed rule to this 
    direct final rule in this issue of the Federal Register in order to 
    take comment on provisions of the direct final rule. If EPA does 
    receive significant adverse comments, EPA will publish a document in 
    the Federal Register withdrawing portions of the direct final rule. In 
    addition, EPA is publishing an interim final rule in today's Federal 
    Register to address other monitoring issues that may be controversial. 
    The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed 
    rule, on the interim final rule, or on any subsequent final rule. Any 
    parties interested in commenting on these revisions to parts 72 and 75 
    should do so at this time.
        Significant adverse comment will be addressed in a subsequent final 
    rulemaking document. If EPA withdraws portions of the direct final 
    rule, EPA will accept comments for 15 days after publication of the 
    notice of withdrawal in order to receive additional comments on 
    withdrawn portions of the rule. If the effective date is delayed, 
    timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
        The owner or operator shall comply with the following requirements 
    from July 17, 1995 through December 31, 1995: for the recordkeeping 
    requirements of subpart F of part 75, by following either Secs. 75.50, 
    75.51 and 75.52 or Secs. 75.54, 75.55 and 75.56; for the missing data 
    substitution requirements for carbon dioxide (CO2) and heat input, 
    by following either Secs. 75.35 and 75.36 or sections 4.3.1 through 
    4.3.3, section 4.4.3 and section 5.3 and 5.4 of appendix F of part 75; 
    and for the missing data substitution requirements for fuel flowmeters 
    by following either section 2.4.3.1 or sections 2.4.3.2 and 2.4.3.3 of 
    appendix D of part 75.
        On or after January 1, 1996, the owner or operator shall comply 
    with the following requirements: for the recordkeeping requirements of 
    subpart F of part 75, by meeting the requirements of Secs. 75.54, 
    75.55, and 75.56; and for the missing data substitution requirements 
    for CO2 concentration, heat input and fuel flowmeters by meeting 
    the requirements of Secs. 75.35 and 75.36 and sections 2.4.3.2 through 
    2.4.3.3 of appendix D of part 75.
        The EPA has been engaged in settlement discussions with several 
    parties who challenged certain provisions of the Acid Rain CEM rules 
    promulgated on January 11, 1993. [See Environmental Defense Fund v. 
    Browner, No. 93-1203 and consolidated cases, ``Complex'' (D.C. Cir. 
    filed March 12, 1993).] Although the parties have been able to reach 
    agreement on a number of issues, which are addressed in this direct 
    final rulemaking, some additional issues remain outstanding. The 
    outstanding issues, unlike the noncontroversial and routine technical 
    corrections and other amendments addressed by this direct final rule, 
    may not be considered noncontroversial and therefore are being 
    addressed separately in an interim final rule, published elsewhere in 
    this Federal Register.
    I. Acid Rain Program Background
    
    A. Rulemaking Background
    
        On January 11, 1993, EPA promulgated the ``core'' regulations that 
    implemented the major provisions of title IV of the Clean Air Act (CAA 
    or the Act), as amended November 15, 1990, including the General 
    Provisions of the Permits Regulation (40 CFR part 72) and the CEM 
    regulation at 40 CFR part 75 authorized under Sections 412 and 821 of 
    the Act. The CEM rule specifies how each affected utility unit must 
    install a system to continuously monitor the [[Page 26511]] emissions 
    and to collect, record, and report emissions data to ensure that the 
    mandated reductions in sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide 
    (NOX) emissions are achieved, that opacity and CO2 emissions 
    are measured, and that SO2 emissions are accurately measured so 
    that the allowance system functions in an orderly manner. Technical 
    corrections were published on June 23, 1993 and July 30, 1993. An 
    amendment to the certification deadline for NOX and CO2 
    monitoring for oil-fired units and gas-fired units was published on 
    August 18, 1994.
        Since the CEM rule was promulgated, the operation of Phase I 
    utility units have essentially completed the first stage of 
    implementation of the rule, having submitted monitoring plans, 
    conducted certification testing, submitted certification applications, 
    and submitted their first quarterly reports. In addition, many Phase II 
    utility units also have begun implementation. During early 
    implementation, many technical issues have been raised, including many 
    minor issues which could be addressed by technical corrections. The 
    preamble discussion that follows outlines the changes that are 
    contained in today's direct final rulemaking that will make these 
    technical corrections.
    
    B. Implementation Background
    
        The EPA held three Acid Rain Implementation Conferences (January 5-
    6, 1993; January 25-26, 1993; and March 16-17, 1993). In these public 
    meetings, EPA staff presented an overview of the Acid Rain Program and 
    Acid Rain core rules. Some of the changes in today's revised rule 
    resulted from issues raised by the public at these conferences.
        In order to respond to a multitude of questions raised by industry, 
    EPA instituted a new ``Acid Rain monitoring'' section on the Agency's 
    computerized Technology Transfer Network Bulletin Board System 
    (TTNBBS). This bulletin board can be accessed by computer modem at 
    (919) 541-5742. The EPA's Acid Rain Division periodically updates this 
    section of the bulletin board with notices of meetings, interpretations 
    of part 75, policy determinations, and other information relevant to 
    State environmental regulators and the regulated community. In 
    particular, EPA has published three installments of commonly asked 
    questions and their answers in the ``Acid Rain CEM (Part 75) Policy 
    Manual'' (Docket Item I-D-54). Many of these policy determinations and 
    clarifications of part 75 are incorporated into today's revised rule.
        Some standard forms have been revised to be consistent with the 
    changes in this rulemaking. Packages of revised standard forms, with 
    instructions, will contain revised monitoring plan forms, certification 
    forms, and electronic data reporting format, and will be available from 
    EPA in electronic form from the TTNBBS by using computer modem at (919) 
    541-5742 or on paper by calling the Acid Rain Hotline at (202) 233-
    9620.
    
    II. Changes to Parts 72 and 75--General Provisions of the Permits 
    Regulation and Continuous Emission Monitoring
    
        Several of the definitions in Sec. 72.2 related to monitoring have 
    been revised. As explained below, EPA edited these definitions and 
    added a few definitions to explain or clarify new or existing terms in 
    part 75.
        The changes to part 75 are clarifications intended to ease 
    implementation, and do not constitute major policy changes. The most 
    significant changes in today's revised part 75 concern deadlines for 
    completing certification testing, the procedures for exceptions to the 
    use of CEMS found in appendices D and E, and the provisions for 
    determining the span of NOX pollutant concentration monitors. The 
    EPA has added to the list of certification testing deadlines to apply 
    to more types of units that might require certification after the 
    statutory deadline for installation of CEMS. In addition, the Agency 
    rewrote major portions of appendices D and E to make them easier to 
    understand and to implement. Changes to appendix E also substantially 
    reduce the time and difficulty of testing required to obtain NOX 
    emission rate data. Finally, the procedures for determining NOX 
    span have been revised so that utilities with units having low NOX 
    emission rates may select a single span representative of the situation 
    at their plant, rather than being required to use both a high scale and 
    a low scale measurement range. A list of compliance dates for the 
    revised recordkeeping requirements and missing data substitution 
    procedures are included in the new appendix J.
        The rationale and effect of the revisions to parts 72 and 75 are 
    discussed in detail in a technical support document. This document may 
    be obtained from the EPA Air Docket as Docket Item II-F-2, ``Technical 
    Support Document (Attachment A),'' in Docket No. A-94-16. In addition, 
    EPA is publishing this document under the CAA Title IV portion of EPA's 
    TTNBBS. This bulletin board can be accessed by computer modem at (919) 
    541-5742. The topics in the rule revisions discussed in the Technical 
    Support Document are as follows:
    
    I. Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations
    II. Acid Rain Program Background
        A. Rulemaking Background
        B. Implementation Background
    III. Changes to Part 72--Permits Regulation General Provisions
        A. Fuel-related Definitions
        B. Operating Hour Definitions
        C. Calibration Gas Definitions
        D. Bypass Operating Quarter, Unit Operating Quarter
        E. Ozone Nonattainment Area, Ozone Transport Region
        F. Other Definitions
    IV. Changes to Part 75--Continuous Emission Monitoring
        A. General Revisions
        B. Changes to Subpart A, General
        1. Certification Deadlines
        a. Shutdown Units
        b. New Stacks or Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
        c. Backup Fuel and Emergency Fuel
        d. Newly Affected Units
        e. EIA Forms
        f. Emissions Accounting Prior to Certification
        2. Incorporation by Reference
        3. Relative Accuracy and Availability Performance Analysis
        C. Changes to Subpart B, Monitoring Provisions
        1. Calculation of Average Emissions and Opacity Data
        2. Peaking Unit Definition and Applicability of Appendix E
        3. SO2 Monitoring During Combustion of Gas for Units With 
    SO2 CEMS
        4. Monitoring Common Stacks, Bypass Stacks, and Multiple Stacks
        a. Common Stack Monitoring
        b. Multiple Stacks--NOXMonitoring
        c. Bypass Stack Monitoring
        5. Determining Emissions From Qualifying Phase I Technologies
        D. Changes to Subpart C, Operation and Maintenance Requirements
        1. Certification Procedures for CEMS
        a. Initial Certification and Recertification
        b. Loss of Certification Procedures
        c. Submission and Retesting Deadlines
        d. Audit Decertification
        e. Monitoring Systems To Be Certified
        f. Use of Backup or Portable Monitoring Systems
        2. Certification Procedures for Alternative Monitoring Systems
        3. Certification Procedures for Excepted Monitoring Systems
        E. Changes to Subpart D, Missing Data Procedures
        1. Missing Data Procedures for Peaking Units
        2. Addition to NOX and Flow Missing Data Procedures
        3. Changes to CO2 and Heat Input Procedures
        4. Missing Data Procedures for Units With Add-on Emission 
    Controls
        5. SO2 Concentration Missing Data During Gas Combustion
        F. Changes to Subpart E, Alternative Monitoring Systems 
    [[Page 26512]] 
        G. Changes to Subpart F, Recordkeeping Requirements
        1. Additional Sections 75.54, 75.55 and 75.56
        2. Changes to Emission Data Records
        3. Certification Records
        4. Monitoring Plans
        5. Records File
        H. Changes to Subpart G, Reporting Requirements
        1. Notifications to EPA and State Agencies
        2. Information Not Reported to EPA
        3. Effective Date of Revised Reporting Requirements
        4. Petitions to the Administrator
        5. Confidentiality of Data
        6. Reporting Addresses
        I. Changes to Appendix A, Specifications and Testing Procedures
        1. Changes to Span Requirements
        a. Span for SO2 Pollutant Concentration Monitors
        b. Span for NOX Pollutant Concentration Monitors
        c. Changes to Span
        2. Clarification of Certification Test Procedures
        a. Calibration Error Test
        b. Cycle Time Test
        c. Relative Accuracy Test for NOX
        d. RATAs for CO2 and O2
        3. Calibration Gases
        4. Changes to Appendix B, Quality Assurance and Quality Control 
    Procedures
        5. Periodic RATAs for Monitors on Peaking Units and Bypass 
    Stacks
        6. Incentive Standard and Out-of-Control for CO2 Monitors
        7. Incentive Standard for NOX Low Emitters
        8. Quality Assurance of Data Following Daily Calibration Error 
    Test
        9. Recalibration
        10. Calibration Gas for Linearity Checks
        J. Changes to Appendix C, Missing Data Statistical Estimation 
    Procedures
        1. Changes to Parametric Monitoring Procedure for Missing Data
        2. Clarifications of Load-Based Procedure for Missing Flow Rate 
    and NOX Emission Rate Data
        K. Changes to Appendix D, Optional SO2 Emission Protocol 
    for Gas-fired and Oil-fired Units
        1. Gaseous Fuels Other Than Natural Gas
        2. SO2 Emissions From Natural Gas
        3. Fuel Flowmeter Installation Requirements
        4. Gas Flowmeter Accuracy
        5. Fuel Flowmeter Calibration and Quality Assurance Requirements
        6. Fuel Sampling for Diesel Fuel
        7. Turnaround Time for Fuel Analysis
        8. Missing Data Procedures
        9. Heat Input
        L. Changes to Appendix E, Optional NOX Emission Estimation 
    Protocol for Gas-fired Peaking Units and Oil-fired Peaking Units
        1. Testing by Fuel
        2. Heat Input as Unit Operating Load
        3. Number of Load Levels
        4. Tests by Excess O2 Level
        5. Efficiency Testing
        6. Stack Testing Procedures
        7. Quality Assurance and Quality Control Parameters
        8. Emergency Fuel Provisions
        M. Changes to Appendix F, Conversion Procedures
        1. Heat Input
        2. Diluent Cap Values
        3. NOX and SO2 Conversion Procedures
        N. Changes to Appendix G, Determination of CO2 Emissions
    
    III. Impact Analyses
    
    A. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The information collection requirements in this rule have been 
    approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
    Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and have been assigned 
    control number 2060-0258.
        This collection of information has an estimated reporting burden 
    averaging 40 hours per response and an estimated annual recordkeeping 
    burden averaging 160 hours per respondent. These estimates include time 
    for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering 
    and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
    collection of information.
        The control numbers assigned to collections of information in 
    certain EPA regulations by the OMB have been consolidated under 40 CFR 
    part 9. The EPA finds there is ``good cause'' under Sections 553(b)(B) 
    and 553(d)(3) of the Administrative Procedure Act to amend the 
    applicable table in 40 CFR part 9 to display the OMB control number for 
    this rule without prior notice and comment. Due to the technical nature 
    of the table, further notice and comment would be unnecessary. For 
    additional information, see 58 FR 18014, April 7, 1993, and 58 FR 
    27472, May 10, 1993.
        Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of 
    this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this 
    burden to Chief, Information Policy Branch; EPA; 401 M St., SW (Mail 
    Code 2136); Washington, DC 20460; and to the Office of Information and 
    Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 
    20503, marked ``Attention: Desk Officer for EPA.''
    
    B. Executive Order Requirements
    
    1. Executive Order 12866
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to OMB review and the requirements of the 
    Executive Order. The Order defines ``significant regulatory action'' as 
    one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
        (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
    adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
    economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
    health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
    communities;
        (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
    action taken or planned by another agency;
        (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
    user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
    thereof; or
        (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
    mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
    the Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of Executive Order 12866, OMB has notified 
    EPA that it considers this a ``significant regulatory action'' within 
    the meaning of the Executive Order. The EPA has submitted this action 
    to OMB for review. Changes made in response to OMB suggestions or 
    recommendations will be documented in the public record.
        The revisions to part 75 slightly decrease the overall cost of 
    compliance for the regulated community. Therefore, the Agency did not 
    prepare a Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). Revisions to appendix D of 
    part 75, ``Optional SO2 Emissions Data Protocol for Gas-Fired and 
    Oil-Fired Units,'' reduce the frequency of sampling and analysis of 
    diesel fuel, reducing the cost of SO2 monitoring for units using 
    No. 2 fuel oil as a backup fuel. Revisions to appendix E of part 75, 
    ``Optional NOX Emission Estimation Protocol for Gas-Fired Peaking 
    Units and Oil-Fired Peaking Units,'' reduce the amount of testing for 
    gas-fired peaking units and oil-fired peaking units using this optional 
    procedure. A small gas-fired or oil-fired peaking unit using appendix D 
    or appendix E would have monitoring costs reduced by 10 to 40 percent 
    from the cost of the promulgated rule of January 11, 1993.
    2. Executive Order 12875
        Executive Order 12875 generally prohibits Agencies from issuing 
    regulations not required by statute that impose mandates on State, 
    local, and tribal governments unless federal funding is provided for 
    the direct costs of compliance or the Agency, after consultation with 
    the affected entities, justifies the need for an unfunded mandate. 
    Clean Air Act Section 412(a) required EPA to issue regulations 
    specifying requirements for CEMS and alternative monitoring systems, as 
    well as for recordkeeping and reporting of [[Page 26513]] information 
    from such systems. This direct final rule revises the regulation 
    required under Section 412(a) in order to address various issues that 
    have come to light during early implementation and is therefore a 
    statutorily-required regulation. In addition, as discussed above, the 
    revisions to the regulation do not impose additional costs, but rather 
    slightly decrease the overall cost of compliance for the regulated 
    community. Therefore, the revisions meet the requirements of Executive 
    Order 12875.
    
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Pursuant to Section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
    U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator certifies on April 28, 1995 that this 
    rule revision will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
        The EPA performed an analysis of the effects upon small utilities 
    of the Acid Rain core rules (58 FR 3649, January 11, 1993), including 
    permitting, allowances, and continuous emission monitoring. The earlier 
    document concluded that significant costs would occur to small 
    utilities as a result of statutory requirements. For example, based 
    upon a worst case for model utilities, total regulatory costs could 
    represent as much as 6 to 7 percent of the average value of electricity 
    produced in the year 2000. About one-third of the 105 small utilities 
    currently affected could face impacts of up to this magnitude.
        Today's revisions to part 75 have a beneficial impact on small 
    entities by reducing the burden of complying with the Acid Rain Program 
    monitoring requirements for approximately 800 small utility units. 
    Revisions to appendix D of part 75 reduce the frequency of sampling and 
    analysis of diesel fuel, reducing the cost of SO2 monitoring for 
    units using diesel fuel (No. 2 fuel oil) as a backup fuel. The EPA 
    estimates that this will reduce the cost of complying with monitoring 
    requirements by 15 percent per year for SO2 monitoring for units 
    using diesel fuel. Revisions to appendix E of part 75 reduce the amount 
    of testing for gas-fired peaking units and oil-fired peaking units. The 
    EPA estimates that these changes will reduce the cost of appendix E 
    testing by one-third for boilers and by one-tenth for stationary gas 
    turbines and diesel reciprocating engines. A small gas-fired or oil-
    fired peaking unit monitoring using appendix D or appendix E would have 
    monitoring costs reduced by 10 to 40 percent from the cost of the 
    promulgated rule of January 11, 1993.
    
    D. Unfunded Mandates Act
    
        Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (``Unfunded 
    Mandates Act'') (signed into law on March 22, 1995) requires that the 
    Agency prepare a budgetary impact statement before promulgating a rule 
    that includes a Federal mandate that may result in expenditure by 
    State, local, and tribal governments, in aggregate, or by the private 
    sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. Section 203 requires 
    the Agency to establish a plan for obtaining input from and informing, 
    educating, and advising any small governments that may be significantly 
    or uniquely affected by the rule.
        Under section 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Act, the Agency must 
    identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives 
    before promulgating a rule for which a budgetary impact statement must 
    be prepared. The Agency must select from those alternatives the least 
    costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that 
    achieves the objectives of the rule, unless the Agency explains why 
    this alternative is not selected or why the selection of this 
    alternative is inconsistent with law.
        Because this direct final rule and its associated proposed and 
    interim final rules are estimated to have an impact of less than $100 
    million in any one year, the Agency has not prepared a budgetary impact 
    statement or specifically addressed the selection of the least costly, 
    most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative. Because small 
    governments will not be significantly or uniquely affected by the 
    revisions to parts 72 and 75, the Agency is not required to develop a 
    plan with regard to small governments. However, as discussed in this 
    preamble, the rule revisions have the net effect of reducing the burden 
    of part 75 of the Acid Rain regulations on regulated entities, 
    including both investor-owned and State and municipally-owned 
    utilities.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 9, 72, and 75
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon dioxide, 
    Continuous emission monitors, Electric utilities, Incorporation by 
    reference, Nitrogen oxides, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Sulfur dioxide.
    
        Dated: April 28, 1995.
    Carol M. Browner,
    Administrator.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, parts 9, 72, and 75 of 
    title 40, chapter I, of the Code of Federal Regulations are amended as 
    follows:
    
    PART 9--OMB APPROVALS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
    
        1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq., 136-136y; 15 U.S.C. 2001, 2003, 
    2005, 2006, 2601-2671; 21 U.S.C. 331j, 346a, 348; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 33 
    U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 1311, 1313d, 1314, 1321, 1326, 1330, 1344, 1345 
    (d) and (e), 1361; E.O. 11735, 58 FR 21243, 3 CFR, 1971-1975 Comp. 
    p. 973; 42 U.S.C. 241, 242b, 243, 246, 300f, 300g, 300g-1, 300g-2, 
    300g-3, 300g-4, 300g-5, 300g-6, 300j-1, 300j-2, 300j-3, 300j-4, 
    300j-9, 1857 et seq., 6901-6992k, 7401-7767q, 7542, 9601-9657, 
    11023, 11048.
    
        2. The table in Sec. 9.1 under the heading ``Continuous Emission 
    Monitoring'' by removing the entries for ``Secs. 75.50 through 75.53'' 
    and by adding entries for ``Secs. 75.50 through 75.52'' and 
    ``Secs. 75.53 through 75.56'' to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 9.1  OMB approvals under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
    
    * * * * *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 OMB Control
                          40 CFR Citation                            No.    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            
                      *        *        *        *        *                 
    Continuous Emission Monitoring                                          
                      *        *        *        *        *                 
    75.50-75.52................................................    2060-0258
    75.53-75.56................................................    2060-0258
                      *        *        *        *        *                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    PART 72--PERMITS REGULATION
    
        3. The authority citation for part 72 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7651, et seq.
    
    Subpart A--Acid Rain Program General Provisions
    
        4. Section 72.2 is amended by revising the definitions of 
    ``Calibration gas'', ``Capacity factor'', ``Diesel fuel'', ``Gas-
    fired'', ``Maximum potential NOx emission rate'', ``Monitor 
    operating hour'', ``Natural gas'', ``Oil-fired'', ``Peaking unit'', 
    ``Quality assured monitoring operating hour'', ``Stationary gas 
    turbine'' and ``Unit operating hours'', and by adding, in alphabetical 
    order, new definitions for ``Backup fuel'', ``By-pass operating 
    quarter'', ``Diesel-fired unit'', ``Emergency fuel'', ``Excepted 
    monitoring system'', ``Flue gas desulfurization system'', ``Gaseous 
    fuel'', ``Hour before and after'', ``NIST traceable reference 
    material'', ``Ozone nonattainment area'', ``Ozone transport region'', 
    ``Pipeline natural gas'', [[Page 26514]] ``Research gas material'', 
    ``Unit operating day'', and ``Unit operating quarter''; and by removing 
    the definition of ``zero ambient air material'' and adding a definition 
    of ``zero air material'' to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 72.2  Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        Backup fuel means a fuel for a unit where: (1) For purposes of the 
    requirements of the monitoring exception of appendix E of part 75 of 
    this chapter, the fuel provides less than 10.0 percent of the heat 
    input to a unit during the three calendar years prior to certification 
    testing for the primary fuel and the fuel provides less than 15.0 
    percent of the heat input to a unit in each of those three calendar 
    years; or the Administrator approves the fuel as a backup fuel; and (2) 
    For all other purposes under the Acid Rain Program, a fuel that is not 
    the primary fuel (expressed in mmBtu) consumed by an affected unit for 
    the applicable calendar year.
    * * * * *
        Bypass operating quarter means a calendar quarter during which 
    emissions pass through a stack, duct or flue that bypasses add-on 
    emission controls.
    * * * * *
        Calibration gas means: (1) a standard reference material; (2) a 
    NIST traceable reference material; (3) a Protocol 1 gas; (4) a research 
    gas material; or (5) zero air material.
        Capacity factor means either: (1) the ratio of a unit's actual 
    annual electric output (expressed in MWe-hr) to the unit's nameplate 
    capacity times 8760 hours, or (2) the ratio of a unit's annual heat 
    input (in million British thermal units or equivalent units of measure) 
    to the unit's maximum design heat input (in million British thermal 
    units per hour or equivalent units of measure) times 8,760 hours.
    * * * * *
        Diesel-fired unit means, for the purposes of part 75 of this 
    chapter, an oil-fired unit that combusts diesel fuel as its fuel oil, 
    where the supplementary fuel, if any, shall be limited to natural gas 
    or gaseous fuels containing no more sulfur than natural gas.
        Diesel fuel means a low sulfur fuel oil of grades 1-D or 2-D, as 
    defined by the American Society for Testing and Materials standard ASTM 
    D975-91, ``Standard Specification for Diesel Fuel Oils,'' grades 1-GT 
    or 2-GT, as defined by ASTM D2880-90a, ``Standard Specification for Gas 
    Turbine Fuel Oils,'' or grades 1 or 2, as defined by ASTM D396-90, 
    ``Standard Specification for Fuel Oils'' (incorporated by reference in 
    Sec. 72.13).
    * * * * *
        Emergency fuel means either:
        (1) For purposes of the requirements for a fuel flowmeter used in 
    an excepted monitoring system under appendix D or E of part 75 of this 
    chapter, the fuel identified by the designated representative in the 
    unit's monitoring plan as the fuel which is combusted only during 
    emergencies where the primary fuel is not available; or
        (2) For purposes of the requirement for stack testing for an 
    excepted monitoring system under appendix E of part 75 of this chapter, 
    the fuel identified in the State, local, or Federal permit for a plant 
    and is identified by the designated representative in the unit's 
    monitoring plan as the fuel which is combusted only during emergencies 
    where the primary fuel is not available, as established in a petition 
    under Sec. 75.66 of this chapter.
    * * * * *
        Excepted monitoring system means a monitoring system that follows 
    the procedures and requirements of appendix D or E of part 75 of this 
    chapter for approved exceptions to the use of continuous emission 
    monitoring systems.
    * * * * *
        Flue gas desulfurization system means a type of add-on emission 
    control used to remove sulfur dioxide from flue gas, commonly referred 
    to as a ``scrubber.''
    * * * * *
        Gaseous fuel means a material that is in the gaseous state at 
    standard atmospheric temperature and pressure conditions and that is 
    combusted to produce heat.
    * * * * *
        Gas-fired means:
        (1) The combustion of:
        (i) Natural gas or other gaseous fuel (including coal-derived 
    gaseous fuel), for at least 90.0 percent of the unit's average annual 
    heat input during the previous three calendar years and for at least 
    85.0 percent of the annual heat input in each of those calendar years; 
    and
        (ii) Any fuel other than coal or coal-derived fuel (other than 
    coal-derived gaseous fuel) for the remaining heat input, if any; 
    provided that for purposes of part 75 of this chapter, any fuel used 
    other than natural gas, shall be limited to:
        (A) Gaseous fuels containing no more sulfur than natural gas; or
        (B) Fuel oil.
        (2) For purposes of part 75 of this chapter, a unit may initially 
    qualify as gas-fired under the following circumstances:
        (i) If the designated representative provides fuel usage data for 
    the unit for the three calendar years immediately prior to submission 
    of the monitoring plan, and if the unit's fuel usage is projected to 
    change on or before January 1, 1995, the designated representative 
    submits a demonstration satisfactory to the Administrator that the unit 
    will qualify as gas-fired under the first sentence of this definition 
    using the years 1995 through 1997 as the three calendar year period; or
        (ii) If a unit does not have fuel usage data for one or more of the 
    three calendar years immediately prior to submission of the monitoring 
    plan, the designated representative submits:
        (A) The unit's designed fuel usage;
        (B) Any fuel usage data, beginning with the unit's first calendar 
    year of commercial operation following 1992;
        (C) The unit's projected fuel usage for any remaining future period 
    needed to provide fuel usage data for three consecutive calendar years; 
    and
        (D) Demonstration satisfactory to the Administrator that the unit 
    will qualify as gas-fired under the first sentence of this definition 
    using those three consecutive calendar years as the three calendar year 
    period.
    * * * * *
        Hour before and after means, for purposes of the missing data 
    substitution procedures of part 75 of this chapter, the quality-assured 
    hourly SO2 or CO2 concentration, hourly flow rate, or hourly 
    NOX emission rate recorded by a certified monitor during the unit 
    operating hour immediately before and the unit operating hour 
    immediately after a missing data period.
        Maximum potential NOX emission rate means the emission rate of 
    nitrogen oxides (in lb/mmBtu) calculated in accordance with section 3 
    of appendix F of part 75 of this chapter, using the maximum potential 
    nitrogen oxides concentration as defined in section 2 of appendix A of 
    part 75 of this chapter, and either the maximum oxygen concentration 
    (in percent O2) or the minimum carbon dioxide concentration (in 
    percent CO2) under all operating conditions of the unit except for 
    unit start-up, shutdown, and upsets.
    * * * * *
        Monitor operating hour means any unit operating hour or portion 
    thereof over which a CEMS, or other monitoring system approved by the 
    Administrator under part 75 of this chapter is operating, regardless of 
    the number of measurements (i.e., data points) [[Page 26515]] collected 
    during the hour or portion of an hour.
    * * * * *
        Natural gas means a naturally occurring fluid mixture of 
    hydrocarbons (e.g., methane, ethane, or propane) containing 1 grain or 
    less hydrogen sulfide per 100 standard cubic feet, and 20 grains or 
    less total sulfur per 100 standard cubic feet), produced in geological 
    formations beneath the Earth's surface, and maintaining a gaseous state 
    at standard atmospheric temperature and pressure under ordinary 
    conditions.
    * * * * *
        NIST traceable reference material (NTRM) means a calibration gas 
    mixture tested by and certified by the National Institutes of Standards 
    and Technologies (NIST) to have a certain specified concentration of 
    gases. NTRMs may have different concentrations from those of standard 
    reference materials.
    * * * * *
        Oil-fired means:
        (1) The combustion of:
        (i) Fuel oil for more than 10.0 percent of the average annual heat 
    input during the previous three calendar years or for more than 15.0 
    percent of the annual heat input during any one of those calendar 
    years; and
        (ii) Any solid, liquid, or gaseous fuel (including coal-derived 
    gaseous fuel), other than coal or any other coal derived fuel, for the 
    remaining heat input, if any; provided that for purposes of part 75 of 
    this chapter, any fuel used other than fuel oil shall be limited to 
    gaseous fuels containing no more sulfur than natural gas.
        (2) For purposes of part 75 of this chapter, a unit that does not 
    have fuel usage data for one or more of the three calendar years 
    immediately prior to submission of the monitoring plan may initially 
    qualify as oil-fired under the following circumstances: the designated 
    representative submits:
        (i) Unit design fuel usage,
        (ii) The unit's designed fuel usage,
        (iii) Any fuel usage data, beginning with the unit's first calendar 
    year of commercial operation following 1992,
        (iv) The unit's projected fuel usage for any remaining future 
    period needed to provide fuel usage data for three consecutive calendar 
    years, and
        (v) A demonstration satisfactory to the Administrator that the unit 
    will qualify as oil-fired under the first sentence of this definition 
    using those three consecutive calendar years as the three calendar year 
    period.
    * * * * *
        Ozone nonattainment area means an area designated as a 
    nonattainment area for ozone under subpart C of part 81 of this 
    chapter.
        Ozone transport region means the ozone transport region designated 
    under Section 184 of the Act.
    * * * * *
        Peaking unit means:
        (1) A unit that has:
        (i) An average capacity factor of no more than 10.0 percent during 
    the previous three calendar years and
        (ii) A capacity factor of no more than 20.0 percent in each of 
    those calendar years.
        (2) For purposes of part 75 of this chapter, a unit may initially 
    qualify as a peaking unit under the following circumstances:
        (i) If the designated representative provides capacity factor data 
    for the unit for the three calendar years immediately prior to 
    submission of the monitoring plan and if the unit's capacity factor is 
    projected to change on or before the certification deadline for 
    NOX monitoring in Sec. 75.4 of this chapter, the designated 
    representative submits a demonstration satisfactory to the 
    Administrator that the unit will qualify as a peaking unit under the 
    first sentence of this definition using the three calendar years 
    beginning with the year of the certification deadline for NOX 
    monitoring in Sec. 75.4 of this chapter (either 1995 or 1996) as the 
    three year period; or
        (ii) If the unit does not have capacity factor data for any one or 
    more of the three calendar years immediately prior to submission of the 
    monitoring plan, the designated representative submits:
        (A) Any capacity factor data, beginning with the unit's first 
    calendar year of commercial operation following the first year of the 
    three calendar years immediately prior to the certification deadline 
    for NOX monitoring in Sec. 75.4 of this chapter (either 1992 or 
    1993),
        (B) Capacity factor information for the unit for any remaining 
    future period needed to provide capacity factor data for three 
    consecutive calendar years, and
        (C) A demonstration satisfactory to the Administrator that the unit 
    will qualify as a peaking unit under the first sentence of this 
    definition using the three consecutive calendar years specified in (2) 
    (ii) (A) and (B) as the three calendar year period.
    * * * * *
        Pipeline natural gas means natural gas that is provided by a 
    supplier through a pipeline.
    * * * * *
        Quality-assured monitor operating hour means any unit operating 
    hour or portion thereof over which a certified CEMS, or other 
    monitoring system approved by the Administrator under part 75 of this 
    chapter, is operating:
        (1) Within the performance specifications set forth in part 75, 
    appendix A of this chapter and the quality assurance/quality control 
    procedures set forth in part 75, appendix B of this chapter, without 
    unscheduled maintenance, repair, or adjustment; and
        (2) In accordance with Sec. 75.10(d), (e), and (f) of this chapter.
    * * * * *
        Research gas material (RGM) means a calibration gas mixture 
    developed by agreement of a requestor and the National Institutes for 
    Standards and Technologies (NIST) that NIST analyzes and certifies as 
    ``NIST traceable.'' RGMs may have concentrations different from those 
    of standard reference materials.
    * * * * *
        Stationary gas turbine means a turbine that is not self-propelled 
    and that combusts natural gas, other gaseous fuel with a sulfur content 
    no greater than natural gas, or fuel oil in order to heat inlet 
    combustion air and thereby turn a turbine, in addition to or instead of 
    producing steam or heating water.
    * * * * *
        Unit operating day means a calendar day in which a unit combusts 
    any fuel.
        Unit operating hour means any hour (or fraction of an hour) during 
    which a unit combusts any fuel.
        Unit operating quarter means a calendar quarter in which a unit 
    combusts any fuel.
    * * * * *
        Zero air material means either: (1) a calibration gas certified by 
    the gas vendor not to contain concentrations of either SO2, 
    NO, or total hydrocarbons above 0.1 parts per million (ppm); 
    a concentration of CO above 1 ppm; and a concentration of CO2 
    above 400 ppm, or (2) ambient air conditioned and purified by a 
    continuous emission monitoring system for which the continuous emission 
    monitoring system manufacturer or vendor certifies that the particular 
    continuous emission monitoring system model produces conditioned gas 
    that does not contain concentrations of either SO2 or NO 
    above 0.1 ppm or CO2 above 400 ppm; and that does not contain 
    concentrations of other gases that interfere with instrument readings 
    or cause the instrument to read concentrations of SO2, 
    NO, or CO2 for a particular continuous emission 
    monitoring system model.
    * * * * *
        5. Section 72.13 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (a)(8) and 
    [[Page 26516]] (a)(9) as (a)(9) and (a)(10), and by adding paragraph 
    (a)(8), and by revising newly designated paragraphs (a)(9) and (a)(10) 
    to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 72.13  Incorporation by reference.
    
    * * * * *
        (8) ASTM D2880-90a, Standard Specification for Gas Turbine Fuel 
    Oils, for Sec. 72.2 of this part.
        (9) ASTM D4057-88, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of 
    Petroleum and Petroleum Products, for Sec. 72.7 of this part.
        (10) ASTM D4294-90, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum 
    Products by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy, for 
    Sec. 72.7 of this part.
    * * * * *
    
    PART 75--CONTINUOUS EMISSIONS MONITORING
    
        6-7. The authority citation for part 75 is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7601 and 7651, et seq.
    
    
    Sec. 75.2  [Amended]
    
        8. Section 75.2 is amended by removing paragraph (b)(4).
        9. Section 75.4 is amended by revising the last sentence of 
    paragraph (a) introductory text and by revising paragraphs (a)(1), 
    (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (b), (c), and (d), by redesignating and 
    revising paragraph (e) as paragraph (h) and by adding new paragraphs 
    (e), (f), and (g) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.4  Compliance dates.
    
        (a) * * * In accordance with Sec. 75.20, the owner or operator of 
    each existing affected unit shall ensure that all monitoring systems 
    required by this part for monitoring SO2, NO, CO2, 
    opacity, and volumetric flow are installed and all certification tests 
    are completed not later than the following dates (except as provided in 
    paragraphs (d) through (h) of this section):
        (1) For a unit listed in Table 1 of Sec. 73.10(a) of this chapter, 
    November 15, 1993.
        (2) For a substitution or a compensating unit that is designated 
    under an approved substitution plan or reduced utilization plan 
    pursuant to Sec. 72.41 or Sec. 72.43 of this chapter, or for a unit 
    that is designated an early election unit under an approved 
    NO compliance plan pursuant to part 76 of this chapter, that 
    is not conditionally approved and that is effective for 1995, the 
    earlier of the following dates:
        (i) January 1, 1995; or
        (ii) 90 days after the issuance date of the Acid Rain permit (or 
    date of approval of permit revision) that governs the unit and contains 
    the approved substitution plan, reduced utilization plan, or 
    NO compliance plan.
        (3) For either a Phase II unit, other than a gas-fired unit or an 
    oil-fired unit, or a substitution or compensating unit that is not a 
    substitution or compensating unit under paragraph (a)(2) of this 
    section: January 1, 1995.
        (4) For a gas-fired Phase II unit or an oil-fired Phase II unit, 
    January 1, 1995, except that installation and certification tests for 
    continuous emission monitoring systems for NO and CO2 or 
    excepted monitoring systems for NO under appendix E or 
    CO2 estimation under appendix G of this part shall be completed as 
    follows:
        (i) For an oil-fired Phase II unit or a gas-fired Phase II unit 
    located in an ozone nonattainment area or the ozone transport region, 
    not later than July 1, 1995; or
        (ii) For an oil-fired Phase II unit or a gas-fired Phase II unit 
    not located in an ozone nonattainment area or the ozone transport 
    region, not later than January 1, 1996.
        (5) * * *
        (b) In accordance with Sec. 75.20, the owner or operator of each 
    new affected unit shall ensure that all monitoring systems required 
    under this part for monitoring of SO2, NO, CO2, 
    opacity, and volumetric flow are installed and all certification tests 
    are completed on or before the later of the following dates:
        (1) January 1, 1995, except that for a gas-fired unit or oil-fired 
    unit located in an ozone nonattainment area or the ozone transport 
    region, the date for installation and completion of all certification 
    tests for NO and CO2 monitoring systems shall be July 1, 
    1995 and for a gas-fired unit or an oil-fired unit not located in an 
    ozone nonattainment area or the ozone transport region, the date for 
    installation and completion of all certification tests for NO 
    and CO2 monitoring systems shall be January 1, 1996; or
        (2) Not later than 90 days after the date the unit commences 
    commercial operation, notice of which date shall be provided under 
    subpart G of this part.
        (c) In accordance with Sec. 75.20, the owner or operator of any 
    unit affected under any paragraph of Sec. 72.6(a)(3) (ii) through (vii) 
    of this chapter shall ensure that all monitoring systems required under 
    this part for monitoring of SO2, NO, CO2, opacity, 
    and volumetric flow are installed and all certification tests are 
    completed on or before the later of the following dates:
        (1) January 1, 1995, except that for a gas-fired unit or oil-fired 
    unit located in an ozone nonattainment area or the ozone transport 
    region, the date for installation and completion of all certification 
    tests for NO and CO2 monitoring systems shall be July 1, 
    1995 and for a gas-fired unit or an oil-fired unit not located in an 
    ozone nonattainment area or the ozone transport region, the date for 
    installation and completion of all certification tests for NO 
    and CO2 monitoring systems shall be January 1, 1996; or
        (2) Not later than 90 days after the date the unit becomes subject 
    to the requirements of the Acid Rain Program, notice of which date 
    shall be provided under subpart G of this part.
        (d) In accordance with Sec. 75.20, the owner or operator of an 
    existing unit that is shutdown and is not yet operating by the 
    applicable dates listed in paragraph (a) of this section, shall ensure 
    that all monitoring systems required under this part for monitoring of 
    SO2, NO, CO2, opacity, and volumetric flow are 
    installed and all certification tests are completed not later than the 
    earlier of 45 unit operating days or 180 calendar days after the date 
    that the unit recommences commercial operation of the affected unit, 
    notice of which date shall be provided under subpart G of this part. 
    The owner or operator shall determine and report SO2 
    concentration, NO emission rate, CO2 concentration, and 
    flow data for all unit operating hours after the applicable compliance 
    date in paragraph (a) of this section until all required certification 
    tests are successfully completed using either:
        (1) The maximum potential concentration of SO2, the maximum 
    potential NO emission rate, the maximum potential flow rate, 
    as defined in section 2.1 of appendix A of this part, or the maximum 
    CO2 concentration used to determine the maximum potential 
    concentration of SO2 in section 2.1.1.1 of appendix A of this 
    part; or
        (2) Reference methods under Sec. 75.22(b); or
        (3) Another procedure approved by the Administrator pursuant to a 
    petition under Sec. 75.66.
        (e) In accordance with Sec. 75.20, if the owner or operator of an 
    existing unit completes construction of a new stack, flue, or flue gas 
    desulfurization system after the applicable deadline in paragraph (a) 
    of this section, then the owner or operator shall ensure that all 
    monitoring systems required under this part for monitoring SO2, 
    NO, CO2, opacity, and volumetric flow are installed on 
    the new stack or duct and all certification tests are completed not 
    later than 90 calendar days after the date that emissions first exit to 
    the [[Page 26517]] atmosphere through the new stack, flue, or flue gas 
    desulfurization system, notice of which date shall be provided under 
    subpart G of this part. Until emissions first pass through the new 
    stack, flue or flue gas desulfurization system, the unit is subject to 
    the appropriate deadline in paragraph (a) of this section. The owner or 
    operator shall determine and report SO2 concentration, 
    NO emission rate, CO2 concentration, and flow data for 
    all unit operating hours after emissions first pass through the new 
    stack, flue, or flue gas desulfurization system until all required 
    certification tests are successfully completed using either:
        (1) The appropriate value for substitution of missing data upon 
    recertification pursuant to Sec. 75.20(b)(3); or
        (2) Reference methods under Sec. 75.22(b) of this part; or
        (3) Another procedure approved by the Administrator pursuant to a 
    petition under Sec. 75.66.
        (f) In accordance with Sec. 75.20, the owner or operator of a gas-
    fired or oil-fired peaking unit, if planning to use appendix E of this 
    part, shall ensure that the required certification tests for excepted 
    monitoring systems under appendix E are completed for backup fuel as 
    defined in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter by no later than the later of: 30 
    unit operating days after the date that the unit first combusted that 
    backup fuel after the certification testing of the primary fuel; or The 
    deadline in paragraph (a) of this section. The owner or operator shall 
    determine and report NO emission rate data for all unit 
    operating hours that the backup fuel is combusted after the applicable 
    compliance date in paragraph (a) of this section until all required 
    certification tests are successfully completed using either:
        (1) The maximum potential NO emission rate; or
        (2) Reference methods under Sec. 75.22(b) of this part; or
        (3) Another procedure approved by the Administrator pursuant to a 
    petition under Sec. 75.66.
        (g) In accordance with Sec. 75.20, whenever the owner or operator 
    of a gas-fired or oil-fired unit uses an excepted monitoring system 
    under appendix D or E of this part and combusts emergency fuel as 
    defined in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter, then the owner or operator shall 
    ensure that a fuel flowmeter measuring emergency fuel is installed and 
    the required certification tests for excepted monitoring systems are 
    completed by no later than 30 unit operating days after the first date 
    after January 1, 1995 that the unit combusts emergency fuel. For all 
    unit operating hours that the unit combusts emergency fuel after 
    January 1, 1995 until the owner or operator installs a flowmeter for 
    emergency fuel and successfully completes all required certification 
    tests, the owner or operator shall determine and report SO2 mass 
    emission data using either:
        (1) The maximum potential fuel flow rate, as described in appendix 
    D of this part, and the maximum sulfur content of the fuel, as 
    described in section 2.1.1.1 of appendix A of this part;
        (2) Reference methods under Sec. 75.22(b) of this part; or
        (3) Another procedure approved by the Administrator pursuant to a 
    petition under Sec. 75.66.
        (h) In accordance with Sec. 75.20, the owner or operator of a unit 
    with a qualifying Phase I technology shall ensure that all 
    certification tests for the inlet and outlet SO2-diluent 
    continuous emission monitoring systems are completed no later than 
    January 1, 1997 if the unit with a qualifying Phase I technology 
    requires the use of an inlet SO2-diluent continuous emission 
    monitoring system for the purpose of monitoring SO2 emissions 
    removal from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1999.
        10. Section 75.5 is amended by revising paragraph (e) and by adding 
    paragraph (f) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.5  Prohibitions.
    
    * * * * *
        (e) No owner or operator of an affected unit shall disrupt the 
    continuous emission monitoring system, any portion thereof, or any 
    other approved emission monitoring method, and thereby avoid monitoring 
    and recording SO2, NOX, or CO2 emissions discharged to the 
    atmosphere, except for periods of recertification, or periods when 
    calibration, quality assurance, or maintenance is performed pursuant to 
    Sec. 75.21 and appendix B of this part.
        (f) No owner or operator of an affected unit shall retire or 
    permanently discontinue use of the continuous emission monitoring 
    system, any component thereof, the continuous opacity monitoring 
    system, or any other approved emission monitoring system under this 
    part, except under any one of the following circumstances:
        (1) During the period that the unit is covered by an approved 
    retired unit exemption under Sec. 72.8 of this chapter that is in 
    effect; or
        (2) The owner or operator is monitoring emissions from the unit 
    with another certified monitoring system that provides emission data 
    for the same pollutant or parameter as the retired or discontinued 
    monitoring system; or
        (3) The designated representative submits notification of the date 
    of recertification testing of a replacement monitoring system in 
    accordance with Secs. 75.20 and 75.61, and the owner or operator 
    recertifies thereafter a replacement monitoring system in accordance 
    with Sec. 75.20.
        11. Section 75.6 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b)(1) 
    through (b)(6); by removing paragraphs (b)(7) through (b)(9); and by 
    adding paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.6  Incorporation by reference.
    
    * * * * * *
        (a) The following materials are available for purchase from the 
    following addresses: American Society for Testing and Material (ASTM), 
    1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103; and the University 
    Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 
    48106.
        (1) ASTM D129-91, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum 
    Products (General Bomb Method), for appendices A and D of this part.
        (2) ASTM D240-87 (Reapproved 1991), Standard Test Method for Heat 
    of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter, for 
    appendices A, D and F of this part.
        (3) ASTM D287-82 (Reapproved 1987), Standard Test Method for API 
    Gravity of Crude Petroleum and Petroleum Products (Hydrometer Method), 
    for appendix D of this part.
        (4) ASTM D388-92, Standard Classification of Coals by Rank, 
    incorporation by reference for appendix F of this part.
        (5) ASTM D941-88, Standard Test Method for Density and Relative 
    Density (Specific Gravity) of Liquids by Lipkin Bicapillary Pycnometer, 
    for appendix D of this part.
        (6) ASTM D1072-90, Standard Test Method for Total Sulfur in Fuel 
    Gases, for appendix D of this part.
        (7) ASTM D1217-91, Standard Test Method for Density and Relative 
    Density (Specific Gravity) of Liquids by Bingham Pycnometer, for 
    appendix D of this part.
        (8) ASTM D1250-80 (Reapproved 1990), Standard Guide for Petroleum 
    Measurement Tables, for appendix D of this part.
        (9) ASTM D1298-85 (Reapproved 1990), Standard Practice for Density, 
    Relative Density (Specific Gravity) or API Gravity of Crude Petroleum 
    and Liquid Petroleum Products by Hydrometer Method, for appendix D of 
    this part. [[Page 26518]] 
        (10) ASTM D1480-91, Standard Test Method for Density and Relative 
    Density (Specific Gravity) of Viscous Materials by Bingham Pycnometer, 
    for appendix D of this part.
        (11) ASTM D1481-91, Standard Test Method for Density and Relative 
    Density (Specific Gravity) of Viscous Materials by Lipkin Bicapillary 
    Pycnometer, for appendix D of this part.
        (12) ASTM D1552-90, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum 
    Products (High Temperature Method), for appendices A and D of the part.
        (13) ASTM D1826-88, Standard Test Method for Calorific (Heating) 
    Value of Gases in Natural Gas Range by Continuous Recording 
    Calorimeter, for appendix F of this part.
        (14) ASTM D1945-91, Standard Test Method for Analysis of Natural 
    Gas by Gas Chromatography, for appendices F and G of this part.
        (15) ASTM D1946-90, Standard Practice for Analysis of Reformed Gas 
    by Gas Chromatography, for appendices F and G of this part.
        (16) ASTM D1989-92, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value 
    of Coal and Coke by Microprocessor Controlled Isoperibol Calorimeters, 
    for appendix F of this part.
        (17) ASTM D2013-86, Standard Method of Preparing Coal Samples for 
    Analysis, for Sec. 75.15 and appendix F of this part.
        (18) ASTM D2015-91, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value 
    of Coal and Coke by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter, for Sec. 75.15 and 
    appendices A, D and F of this part.
        (19) ASTM D2234-89, Standard Test Methods for Collection of a Gross 
    Sample of Coal, for Sec. 75.15 and appendix F of this part.
        (20) ASTM D2382-88, Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of 
    Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter (High-Precision Method), for 
    appendices D and F of this part.
        (21) ASTM D2502-87, Standard Test Method for Estimation of 
    Molecular Weight (Relative Molecular Mass) of Petroleum Oils from 
    Viscosity Measurements, for appendix G of this part.
        (22) ASTM D2503-82 (Reapproved 1987), Standard Test Method for 
    Molecular Weight (Relative Molecular Mass) of Hydrocarbons by 
    Thermoelectric Measurement of Vapor Pressure, for appendix G of this 
    part.
        (23) ASTM D2622-92, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum 
    Products by X-Ray Spectrometry, for appendices A and D of this part.
        (24) ASTM D3174-89, Standard Test Method for Ash in the Analysis 
    Sample of Coal and Coke From Coal, for appendix G of this part.
        (25) ASTM D3176-89, Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal 
    and Coke, for appendices A and F of this part.
        (26) ASTM D3177-89, Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the 
    Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, for Sec. 75.15 and appendix A of this 
    part.
        (27) ASTM D3178-89, Standard Test Methods for Carbon and Hydrogen 
    in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, for appendix G of this part.
        (28) ASTM D3238-90, Standard Test Method for Calculation of Carbon 
    Distribution and Structural Group Analysis of Petroleum Oils by the n-
    d-M Method, for appendix G of this part.
        (29) ASTM D3246-81 (Reapproved 1987), Standard Test Method for 
    Sulfur in Petroleum Gas By Oxidative Microcoulometry, for appendix D of 
    this part.
        (30) ASTM D3286-91a, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value 
    of Coal and Coke by the Isoperibol Bomb Calorimeter, for appendix F of 
    this part.
        (31) ASTM D3588-91, Standard Practice for Calculating Heat Value, 
    Compressibility Factor, and Relative Density (Specific Gravity) of 
    Gaseous Fuels, for appendix F of this part.
        (32) ASTM D4052-91, Standard Test Method for Density and Relative 
    Density of Liquids by Digital Density Meter, for appendix D of this 
    part.
        (33) ASTM D4057-88, Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of 
    Petroleum and Petroleum Products, for appendix D of this part.
        (34) ASTM D4177-82 (Reapproved 1990), Standard Practice for 
    Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum Products, for appendix D 
    of this part.
        (35) ASTM D4239-85, Standard Test Methods for Sulfur in the 
    Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High Temperature Tube Furnace 
    Combustion Methods, for Sec. 75.15 and appendix A of this part.
        (36) ASTM D4294-90, Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum 
    Products by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy, for 
    appendices A and D of this part.
        (37) ASTM D4468-85 (Reapproved 1989), Standard Test Method for 
    Total Sulfur in Gaseous Fuels by Hydrogenolysis and Rateometric 
    Colorimetry, for appendix D of this part.
        (38) ASTM D4891-89, Standard Test Method for Heating Value of Gases 
    in Natural Gas Range by Stoichiometric Combustion, for appendix F of 
    this part.
        (39) ASTM D5291-92, Standard Test Methods for Instrumental 
    Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen in Petroleum Products 
    and Lubricants, for appendix G of this part.
        (40) ASTM D5504-94, Standard Test Method for Determination of 
    Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels by Gas Chromatography 
    and Chemiluminescence, for appendix D of this part.
        (b) * * *
        (1) ASME MFC-3M-1989 with September 1990 Errata, Measurement of 
    Fluid Flow in Pipes Using Orifice, Nozzle, and Venturi, for Sec. 75.20 
    and appendix D of this part.
        (2) ASME MFC-4M-1986 (Reaffirmed 1990), Measurement of Gas Flow by 
    Turbine Meters, for Sec. 75.20 and appendix D of this part.
        (3) ASME-MFC-5M-1985, Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits 
    Using Transit-Time Ultrasonic Flowmeters, for Sec. 75.20 and appendix D 
    of this part.
        (4) ASME MFC-6M-1987 with June 1987 Errata, Measurement of Fluid 
    Flow in Pipes Using Vortex Flow Meters, for Sec. 75.20 and appendix D 
    of this part.
        (5) ASME MFC-7M-1987 (Reaffirmed 1992), Measurement of Gas Flow by 
    Means of Critical Flow Venturi Nozzles, for Sec. 75.20 and appendix D 
    of this part.
        (6) ASME MFC-9M-1988 with December 1989 Errata, Measurement of 
    Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits by Weighing Method, for Sec. 75.20 and 
    appendix D of this part.
        (c) The following materials are available for purchase from the 
    American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 11 W. 42nd Street, New 
    York NY 10036: ISO 8316: 1987(E) Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed 
    Conduits--Method by Collection of the Liquid in a Volumetric Tank, for 
    Sec. 75.20 and appendices D and E of this part.
        (d) The following materials are available for purchase from the 
    following address: Gas Processors Association (GPA), 6526 East 60th 
    Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74145:
        (1) GPA Standard 2172-86, Calculation of Gross Heating Value, 
    Relative Density and Compressibility Factor for Natural Gas Mixtures 
    from Compositional Analysis, for appendices D, E, and F of this part.
        (2) GPA Standard 2261-90, Analysis for Natural Gas and Similar 
    Gaseous Mixtures by Gas Chromatography, for appendices D, F, and G of 
    this part.
        (e) The following materials are available for purchase from the 
    following address: American Gas Association, 1515 Wilson Boulevard, 
    Arlington VA 22209: American Gas Association Report No. 3: Orifice 
    Metering of Natural Gas and Other Related Hydrocarbon Fluids, Part 1: 
    General Equations and Uncertainty [[Page 26519]] Guidelines (October 
    1990 Edition), Part 2: Specification and Installation Requirements 
    (February 1991 Edition) and Part 3: Natural Gas Applications (August 
    1992 Edition), for Sec. 75.20 and appendices D and E of this part.
        12. Section 75.8 is added to Subpart A to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.8  Relative accuracy and availability analysis.
    
        (a) The Agency will conduct an analysis of monitoring data 
    submitted to EPA under this part between November 15, 1993 and December 
    31, 1996 to evaluate the appropriateness of the current performance 
    specifications for relative accuracy and availability trigger 
    conditions for missing data substitution for SO2 and CO2 
    pollutant concentration monitors, flow monitors, and NOX 
    continuous emission monitoring systems.
        (b) Prior to July 1, 1997, the Agency will prepare a report 
    evaluating quarterly report data for the period between January 1, 1994 
    and December 31, 1996 and initial certification test data. Based upon 
    this evaluation, the Administrator will sign for publication in the 
    Federal Register, either:
        (1) A notice that the Agency has completed its analysis and has 
    determined that retaining the current performance specifications for 
    relative accuracy and availability trigger conditions are appropriate; 
    or
        (2) A notice that the Agency will develop a proposed rule, based on 
    the results of the study, proposing alternatives to the current 
    performance specifications for relative accuracy and availability 
    trigger conditions.
        (c) If the Administrator signs a notice that the Agency will 
    develop a proposed rule, the Administrator will:
        (1) Sign a notice of proposed rulemaking by October 31, 1997; and
        (2) Sign a notice of final rulemaking by October 31, 1998.
    Subpart B--Monitoring Provisions
    
        13. Section 75.10 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), 
    (a)(3), (d), (e), and (f) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.10  General operating requirements.
    
        (a) * * *
        (1) The owner or operator shall install, certify, operate, and 
    maintain, in accordance with all the requirements of this part, a 
    SO2 continuous emission monitoring system and a flow monitoring 
    system with the automated data acquisition and handling system for 
    measuring and recording SO2 concentration (in ppm), volumetric gas 
    flow (in scfh), and SO2 mass emissions (in lb/hr) discharged to 
    the atmosphere, except as provided in Secs. 75.11 and 75.16 and subpart 
    E of this part;
        (2) The owner or operator shall install, certify, operate, and 
    maintain, in accordance with all the requirements of this part, a 
    NOX continuous emission monitoring system (consisting of a 
    NOX pollutant concentration monitor and an O2 or CO2 
    diluent gas monitor) with the automated data acquisition and handling 
    system for measuring and recording NOX concentration (in ppm), 
    O2 or CO2 concentration (in percent O2 or CO2) and 
    NOX emission rate (in lb/mmBtu) discharged to the atmosphere, 
    except as provided in Secs. 75.12 and 75.17 and subpart E of this part. 
    The owner or operator shall account for total NOX emissions, both 
    NO and NO2, either by monitoring for both NO and NO2 or by 
    monitoring for NO only and adjusting the emissions data to account for 
    NO2;
        (3) The owner or operator shall determine CO2 emissions by 
    using one of the following options, except as provided in Sec. 75.13 
    and subpart E of this part:
        (i) The owner or operator shall install, certify, operate, and 
    maintain, in accordance with all the requirements of this part, a 
    CO2 continuous emission monitoring system and a flow monitoring 
    system with the automated data acquisition and handling system for 
    measuring and recording CO2 concentration (in ppm or percent), 
    volumetric gas flow (in scfh), and CO2 mass emissions (in tons/hr) 
    discharged to the atmosphere;
        (ii) The owner or operator shall determine CO2 emissions based 
    on the measured carbon content of the fuel and the procedures in 
    appendix G of this part to estimate CO2 emissions (in ton/day) 
    discharged to the atmosphere; or
        (iii) The owner or operator shall install, certify, operate, and 
    maintain, in accordance with all the requirements of this part, a flow 
    monitoring system and a CO2 continuous emission monitoring system 
    using an O2 concentration monitor in order to determine CO2 
    emissions using the procedures in appendix F of this part with the 
    automated data acquisition and handling system for measuring and 
    recording O2 concentration (in percent), CO2 concentration 
    (in percent), volumetric gas flow (in scfh), and CO2 mass 
    emissions (in tons/hr) discharged to the atmosphere; and
    * * * * *
        (d) Primary equipment hourly operating requirements. The owner or 
    operator shall ensure that all continuous emission and opacity 
    monitoring systems required by this part are in operation and 
    monitoring unit emissions or opacity at all times that the affected 
    unit combusts any fuel except as provided in Sec. 75.11(e) and during 
    periods of calibration, quality assurance, or preventive maintenance, 
    performed pursuant to Sec. 75.21 and appendix B of this part, periods 
    of repair, periods of backups of data from the data acquisition and 
    handling system, or recertification performed pursuant to Sec. 75.20. 
    The owner or operator shall also ensure, subject to the exceptions 
    above in this paragraph, that all continuous opacity monitoring systems 
    required by this part are in operation and monitoring opacity during 
    the time following combustion when fans are still operating, unless fan 
    operation is not required to be included under any other applicable 
    Federal, State, or local regulation, or permit. The owner or operator 
    shall ensure that the following requirements are met:
        (1) The owner or operator shall ensure that each continuous 
    emission monitoring system and component thereof is capable of 
    completing a minimum of one cycle of operation (sampling, analyzing, 
    and data recording) for each successive 15-min interval. The owner or 
    operator shall reduce all SO2 concentrations, volumetric flow, 
    SO2 mass emissions, SO2 emission rate in lb/mmBtu (if 
    applicable), CO2 concentration, O2 concentration, CO2 
    mass emissions (if applicable), NOX concentration, and NOX 
    emission rate data collected by the monitors to hourly averages. Hourly 
    averages shall be computed using at least one data point in each 
    fifteen minute quadrant of an hour, where the unit combusted fuel 
    during that quadrant of an hour. Notwithstanding this requirement, an 
    hourly average may be computed from at least two data points separated 
    by a minimum of 15 minutes (where the unit operates for more than one 
    quadrant of an hour) if data are unavailable as a result of the 
    performance of calibration, quality assurance, or preventive 
    maintenance activities pursuant to Sec. 75.21 and appendix B of this 
    part, backups of data from the data acquisition and handling system, or 
    recertification, pursuant to Sec. 75.20. The owner or operator shall 
    use all valid measurements or data points collected during an hour to 
    calculate the hourly averages. All data points collected during an hour 
    shall be, to the extent practicable, evenly spaced over the hour.
        (2) The owner or operator shall ensure that each continuous opacity 
    monitoring system is capable of completing a minimum of one cycle of 
    sampling and analyzing for each successive 10-sec [[Page 26520]] period 
    and one cycle of data recording for each successive 6-min period. The 
    owner or operator shall reduce all opacity data to 6-min averages 
    calculated in accordance with the provisions of part 51, appendix M of 
    this chapter, except where the applicable State implementation plan or 
    operating permit requires a different averaging period, in which case 
    the State requirement shall satisfy this Acid Rain Program requirement.
        (3) Failure of an SO2, CO2 or O2 pollutant 
    concentration monitor, flow monitor, or NOX continuous emission 
    monitoring system, to acquire the minimum number of data points for 
    calculation of an hourly average in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, 
    shall result in the failure to obtain a valid hour of data and the loss 
    of such component data for the entire hour. An hourly average NOX 
    or SO2 emission rate in lb/mmBtu is valid only if the minimum 
    number of data points are acquired by both the pollutant concentration 
    monitor (NOX or SO2) and the diluent monitor (CO2 or 
    O2). Except for SO2 emission rate data in lb/mmBtu, if a 
    valid hour of data is not obtained, the owner or operator shall 
    estimate and record emission or flow data for the missing hour by means 
    of the automated data acquisition and handling system, in accordance 
    with the applicable procedure for missing data substitution in subpart 
    D of this part.
        (e) Optional backup monitor requirements. If the owner or operator 
    chooses to use two or more continuous emission monitoring systems, each 
    of which is capable of monitoring the same stack or duct at a specific 
    affected unit, or group of units using a common stack, then the owner 
    or operator shall designate one monitoring system as the primary 
    monitoring system, and shall record this information in the monitoring 
    plan, as provided for in Sec. 75.53. The owner or operator shall 
    designate the other monitoring system(s) as backup monitoring system(s) 
    in the monitoring plan. The backup monitoring system(s) shall be 
    designated as redundant backup monitoring system(s), non-redundant 
    backup monitoring system(s), or reference method backup system(s), as 
    described in Sec. 75.20(d). When the certified primary monitoring 
    system is operating and not out-of-control as defined in Sec. 75.24, 
    only data from the certified primary monitoring system shall be 
    reported as valid, quality-assured data. Thus, data from the backup 
    monitoring system may be reported as valid, quality-assured data only 
    when the backup is operating and not out-of-control as defined in 
    Sec. 75.24 (or in the applicable reference method in appendix A of part 
    60 of this chapter) and when the certified primary monitoring system is 
    not operating (or is operating but out-of-control). A particular 
    monitor may be designated both as a certified primary monitor for one 
    unit and as a certified redundant backup monitor for another unit.
        (f) Minimum measurement capability requirement. The owner or 
    operator shall ensure that each continuous emission monitoring system 
    and component thereof is capable of accurately measuring, recording, 
    and reporting data, and shall not incur a full scale exceedance, except 
    as provided in sections 2.1.1.4, 2.1.2.4, and 2.1.4 of appendix A of 
    this part.
    * * * * *
        14. Section 75.11 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) and (d), 
    redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (f), and reserving paragraph 
    (e) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.11  Specific provisions for monitoring SO2 emissions 
    (SO2 and flow monitors).
    
    * * * * *
        (c) Unit with no location for a flow monitor meeting siting 
    requirements. Where no location exists that satisfies the minimum 
    physical siting criteria in appendix A to this part for installation of 
    a flow monitor in either the stack or the ducts serving an affected 
    unit or installation of a flow monitor in either the stack or ducts is 
    demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Administrator to be technically 
    infeasible, either:
        (1) The designated representative shall petition the Administrator 
    for an alternative method for monitoring volumetric flow in accordance 
    with Sec. 75.66; or
        (2) The owner or operator shall construct a new stack or modify 
    existing ductwork to accommodate the installation of a flow monitor, 
    and the designated representative shall petition the Administrator for 
    an extension of the required certification date given in Sec. 75.4 and 
    approval of an interim alternative flow monitoring methodology in 
    accordance with Sec. 75.66. The Administrator may grant existing Phase 
    I affected units an extension to January 1, 1995, and existing Phase II 
    affected units an extension to January 1, 1996 for the submission of 
    the certification application for the purpose of constructing a new 
    stack or making substantial modifications to ductwork for installation 
    of a flow monitor; or
        (3) The owner or operator shall install a flow monitor in any 
    existing location in the stack or ducts serving the affected unit at 
    which the monitor can achieve the performance specifications of this 
    part.
        (d) Gas-fired units and oil-fired units. The owner or operator of 
    an affected unit that qualifies as a gas-fired or oil-fired unit, as 
    defined in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter, based on information submitted by 
    the designated representative in the monitoring plan, shall measure and 
    record SO2 emissions using one of the following methods:
        (1) Meet the general operating requirements in Sec. 75.10 for an 
    SO2 continuous emission monitoring system and flow monitoring 
    system except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section. When the 
    owner or operator uses an SO2 continuous emission monitoring 
    system and flow monitoring system to monitor SO2 mass emissions 
    from an affected unit, the owner or operator shall comply with 
    applicable monitoring provisions in paragraph (a) of this section; or
        (2) Provide other information satisfactory to the Administrator 
    using the procedure specified in appendix D to this part for estimating 
    hourly SO2 mass emissions.
        (e) [Reserved]
    * * * * *
        15. Section 75.12 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.12  Specific provisions for monitoring NOX emissions 
    (NOX and diluent gas monitors).
    
    * * * * *
        (c) Gas-fired peaking units or oil-fired peaking units. The owner 
    or operator of an affected unit that qualifies as a gas-fired peaking 
    unit or oil-fired peaking unit, as defined in Sec. 72.2 of this 
    chapter, based on information submitted by the designated 
    representative in the monitoring plan shall comply with one of the 
    following:
        (1) Meet the general operating requirements in Sec. 75.10 for a 
    NOX continuous emission monitoring system; or
        (2) Provide information satisfactory to the Administrator using the 
    procedure specified in appendix E of this part for estimating hourly 
    NOX emission rate. However, if in the years after certification of 
    an excepted monitoring system under appendix E of this part, a unit's 
    operations exceed a capacity factor of 20 percent in any calendar year 
    or exceed a capacity factor of 10.0 percent averaged over three years, 
    the owner or operator shall install, certify, and operate a NOX 
    continuous emission monitoring system no later than December 31 of the 
    following calendar year.
    * * * * * [[Page 26521]] 
        16. Section 75.13 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.13  Specific provisions for monitoring CO2 emissions.
    
        (a) CO2 continuous emission monitoring system. If the owner or 
    operator chooses to use the continuous emission monitoring method, then 
    the owner or operator shall meet the general operating requirements in 
    Sec. 75.10 for a CO2 continuous emission monitoring system and 
    flow monitoring system for each affected unit. The owner or operator 
    shall comply with the applicable provisions specified in Sec. 75.11 (a) 
    through (e) or Sec. 75.16, except that the phrase ``SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system'' is replaced with ``CO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system,'' the term ``maximum potential 
    concentration for SO2'' is replaced with ``maximum CO2 
    concentration,'' and the phrase ``SO2 mass emissions'' is replaced 
    with ``CO2 mass emissions.''
    * * * * *
        (c) Determination of CO2 mass emissions using an O2 
    monitor according to appendix F. If the owner or operator chooses to 
    use the appendix F method, then the owner or operator may determine 
    hourly CO2 concentration and mass emissions with a flow monitoring 
    system, a continuous O2 concentration monitor, fuel F and Fc 
    factors, and where O2 concentration is measured on a dry basis, 
    hourly corrections for the moisture content of the flue gases, using 
    the methods and procedures specified in appendix F to this part. For 
    units using a common stack, multiple stack, or by-pass stack, the owner 
    or operator may use the provisions of Sec. 75.16, except that the 
    phrase ``SO2 continuous emission monitoring system'' is replaced 
    with ``CO2 continuous emission monitoring system,'' the term 
    ``maximum potential concentration of SO'' is replaced with ``maximum 
    CO2 concentration,'' and the phrase ``SO2 mass emissions'' is 
    replaced with ``CO2 mass emissions.''
        17. Section 75.14 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.14  Specific provisions for monitoring opacity.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) Gas-fired units. The owner or operator of an affected unit that 
    qualifies as gas-fired, as defined in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter, based 
    on information submitted by the designated representative in the 
    monitoring plan is exempt from the opacity monitoring requirements of 
    this part.
    * * * * *
        18. Section 75.15 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) 
    introductory text, (a)(1), (a)(2), and Equations 5 and 7 in paragraph 
    (b)(1) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.15  Specific provisions for monitoring SO2 emissions 
    removal by qualifying Phase I technology.
    
        (a) Additional monitoring provisions. In addition to the SO2 
    monitoring requirements in Sec. 75.11 or Sec. 75.16, for the purposes 
    of adequately monitoring SO2 emissions removal by qualifying Phase 
    I technology operated pursuant to Sec. 72.42 of this chapter, the owner 
    or operator shall, except where specified below, use both an inlet 
    SO2-diluent continuous emission monitoring system and an outlet 
    SO2-diluent continuous emission monitoring system, consisting of 
    an SO2 pollutant concentration monitor and a diluent CO2 or 
    O2 monitor. (The outlet SO2-diluent continuous emission 
    monitoring system may consist of the same SO2 pollutant 
    concentration monitor that is required under Sec. 75.11 or Sec. 75.16 
    for the measurement of SO2 emissions discharged to the atmosphere 
    and the diluent monitor used as part of the NO continuous 
    emission monitoring system that is required under Sec. 75.12 or 
    Sec. 75.17 for the measurement of NO emissions discharged 
    into the atmosphere.) During the period when required to measure 
    emissions removal efficiency, from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 
    1999, the owner or operator shall meet the general operating 
    requirements in Sec. 75.10 for both the inlet and the outlet SO2-
    diluent continuous emission monitoring systems, and in addition, the 
    owner or operator shall comply with the monitoring provisions in this 
    section. On January 1, 2000, the owner or operator may cease operating 
    and/or reporting on the inlet SO2-diluent continuous emission 
    monitoring system results for the purposes of the Acid Rain Program.
        (1) Pre-combustion technology. The owner or operator of an affected 
    unit for which a precombustion technology has been employed for the 
    purpose of meeting qualifying Phase I technology requirements shall use 
    sections 4 and 5 of Method 19 in appendix A of part 60 of this chapter 
    to estimate, daily, for the purposes of this part, the percentage 
    SO2 removal efficiency from such technology, and shall substitute 
    the following ASTM methods for sampling, preparation, and analysis of 
    coal for those cited in Method 19: ASTM D2234-89, Standard Test Method 
    for Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal (Type I, Conditions A, B, or C 
    and systematic spacing), ASTM D2013-86, Standard Method of Preparing 
    Coal Samples for Analysis, ASTM D2015-91, Standard Test Method for 
    Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Adiabatic Calorimeter, 
    and ASTM D3177-89, Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the 
    Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke, or ASTM D4239-85, Standard Test 
    Method for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High 
    Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion Methods. Each of the preceding ASTM 
    methods is incorporated by reference in Sec. 75.6.
        (2) Combustion technology. The owner or operator of an affected 
    unit for which a combustion technology has been installed and operated 
    for the purpose of meeting qualifying Phase I technology requirements 
    shall use the coal sampling and analysis procedures in paragraph (a)(1) 
    of this section and Equation 5 in paragraph (b) of this section to 
    estimate the percentage SO2 removal efficiency from such 
    technology.
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (1) * * *
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.000
    
    
    where,
    
    Eco=Average hourly SO2 emission rate in lb/mmBtu, measured at 
    the outlet of the combustion emission controls during the calendar 
    year, calculated from Equation 6.
    Eci=Average hourly SO2 emission rate in lb/mmBtu, determined 
    by coal sampling and analysis according to the methods and procedures 
    in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, calculated from Equation 7.
    (Eq. 6) * * *
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.001
    
    
    where,
    
    Eicj=Each average hourly SO2 emission rate in lb/mmBtu, 
    determined by the coal sampling and analysis methods and procedures in 
    paragraph (a)(1) of this section and calculated using appendix A, 
    Method 19 of part 60 of this chapter, performed once a day.
    p=Total unit operation hours during which coal sampling and analysis is 
    performed to determine SO2 emissions at the inlet to the 
    combustion controls.
    * * * * *
        19. Section 75.16 is revised to read as follows: [[Page 26522]] 
    
    
    Sec. 75.16  Special provisions for monitoring emissions from common, 
    by-pass, and multiple stacks for SO2 emissions and heat input 
    determinations.
    
        (a) Phase I common stack procedures. Prior to January 1, 2000, the 
    following procedures shall be used when more than one unit utilize a 
    common stack:
        (1) Only Phase I units or only Phase II units using common stack. 
    When a Phase I unit uses a common stack with one or more other Phase I 
    units, but no other units, or when a Phase II unit uses a common stack 
    with one or more Phase II units, but no other units, the owner or 
    operator shall either:
        (i) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the duct to 
    the common stack from each affected unit; or
        (ii) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the common 
    stack; and
        (A) Combine emissions for the affected units for recordkeeping and 
    compliance purposes; or
        (B) Provide information satisfactory to the Administrator on 
    methods for apportioning SO2 mass emissions measured in the common 
    stack to each of the affected units. The designated representative 
    shall provide the information to the Administrator through a petition 
    submitted under Sec. 75.66. The Administrator may approve such 
    substitute methods for apportioning SO2 mass emissions measured in 
    a common stack whenever the method ensures complete and accurate 
    accounting of all emissions regulated under this part.
        (2) Phase I unit using common stack with non-Phase I unit(s). When 
    one or more Phase I units uses a common stack with one or more Phase II 
    or nonaffected units, the owner or operator shall either:
        (i) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the duct to 
    the common stack from each affected unit; or
        (ii) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the common 
    stack; and
        (A) Designate any Phase II unit(s) as a substitution or 
    compensating unit(s) accordance with part 72 of this chapter and any 
    nonaffected unit(s) as opt-in units in accordance with part 74 of this 
    chapter and combine emissions for recordkeeping and compliance 
    purposes; or
        (B) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the duct from 
    each Phase II or nonaffected unit; calculate SO2 mass emissions 
    from the Phase I units as the difference between SO2 mass 
    emissions measured in the common stack and SO2 mass emissions 
    measured in the ducts of the Phase II and nonaffected units; record and 
    report the calculated SO2 mass emissions from the Phase I units; 
    and combine emissions for the Phase I units for compliance purposes; or
        (C) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the duct from 
    each Phase I or nonaffected unit; calculate SO2 mass emissions 
    from the Phase II units as the difference between SO2 mass 
    emissions measured in the common stack and SO2 mass emissions 
    measured in the ducts of the Phase I and nonaffected units; and combine 
    emissions for the Phase II units for recordkeeping and compliance 
    purposes; or
        (D) Record the combined emissions from all units as the combined 
    SO2 mass emissions for the Phase I units for recordkeeping and 
    compliance purposes; or
        (E) Provide information satisfactory to the Administrator on 
    methods for apportioning SO2 mass emissions measured in the common 
    stack to each of the units using the common stack. The designated 
    representative shall provide the information to the Administrator 
    through a petition submitted under Sec. 75.66. The Administrator may 
    approve such substitute methods for apportioning SO2 mass 
    emissions measured in a common stack whenever the method ensures 
    complete and accurate accounting of all emissions regulated under this 
    part.
        (3) Phase II unit using common stack with non-affected unit(s). 
    When one or more Phase II units uses a common stack with one or more 
    nonaffected units, the owner or operator shall follow the procedures in 
    paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
        (b) Phase II common stack procedures. On or after January 1, 2000, 
    the following procedures shall be used when more than one unit uses a 
    common stack:
        (1) Unit utilizing common stack with other affected unit(s). When a 
    Phase I or Phase II affected unit utilizes a common stack with one or 
    more other Phase I or Phase II affected units, but no nonaffected 
    units, the owner or operator shall either:
        (i) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the duct to 
    the common stack from each affected unit; or
        (ii) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the common 
    stack; and
        (A) Combine emissions for the affected units for recordkeeping and 
    compliance purposes; or
        (B) Provide information satisfactory to the Administrator on 
    methods for apportioning SO2 mass emissions measured in the common 
    stack to each of the Phase I and Phase II affected units. The 
    designated representative shall provide the information to the 
    Administrator through a petition submitted under Sec. 75.66. The 
    Administrator may approve such substitute methods for apportioning 
    SO2 mass emissions measured in a common stack whenever the method 
    ensures complete and accurate accounting of all emissions regulated 
    under this part.
        (2) Unit utilizing common stack with nonaffected unit(s). When one 
    or more Phase I or Phase II affected units utilizes a common stack with 
    one or more nonaffected units, the owner or operator shall either:
        (i) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the duct to 
    the common stack from each Phase I and Phase II unit; or
        (ii) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the common 
    stack; and
        (A) Designate the nonaffected units as opt-in units in accordance 
    with part 74 of this chapter and combine emissions for recordkeeping 
    and compliance purposes; or
        (B) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in the duct from 
    each nonaffected unit; determine SO2 mass emissions from the 
    affected units as the difference between SO2 mass emissions 
    measured in the common stack and SO2 mass emissions measured in 
    the ducts of the nonaffected units; and combine emissions for the Phase 
    I and Phase II affected units for recordkeeping and compliance 
    purposes; or
        (C) Record the combined emissions from all units as the combined 
    SO2 mass emissions for the Phase I and Phase II affected units for 
    recordkeeping and compliance purposes; or
        (D) Petition through the designated representative and provide 
    information satisfactory to the Administrator on methods for 
    apportioning SO2 mass emissions measured in the common stack to 
    each of the units using the common stack. The Administrator may approve 
    such demonstrated substitute methods for apportioning SO2 mass 
    emissions measured in a common stack whenever the demonstration ensures 
    [[Page 26523]] complete and accurate accounting of all emissions 
    regulated under this part.
        (c) Unit with bypass stack. Whenever any portion of the flue gases 
    from an affected unit can be routed so as to avoid the installed 
    SO2 continuous emission monitoring system and flow monitoring 
    system, the owner or operator shall either:
        (1) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system or flow monitoring system on the bypass 
    flue, duct, or stack gas stream and calculate SO2 mass emissions 
    for the unit as the sum of the emissions recorded by all required 
    monitoring systems; or
        (2) Monitor SO2 mass emissions on the bypass flue, duct, or 
    stack gas stream using the reference methods in Sec. 75.22(b) for 
    SO2 and flow and calculate SO2 mass emissions for the unit as 
    the sum of the emissions recorded by the installed monitoring systems 
    on the main stack and the emissions measured by the reference method 
    monitoring systems; or
        (3) Where a Federal, State, or local regulation or permit prohibits 
    operation of the bypass stack or duct or limits operation of the bypass 
    stack or duct to emergency situations resulting from the malfunction of 
    a flue gas desulfurization system record the following values for each 
    hour during which emissions pass through the bypass stack or duct: the 
    maximum potential concentration for SO2 as determined under 
    section 2 of appendix A of this part, and the hourly volumetric flow 
    value that would be substituted for the flow monitor installed on the 
    main stack or flue under the missing data procedures in subpart D of 
    this part if data from the flow monitor installed on the main stack or 
    flue were missing for the hour. Calculate SO2 mass emissions for 
    the unit as the sum of the emissions calculated with the substitute 
    values and the emissions recorded by the SO2 and flow monitoring 
    systems installed on the main stack.
        (d) Unit with multiple stacks or ducts. When the flue gases from an 
    affected unit utilize two or more ducts feeding into two or more stacks 
    (that may include flue gases from other affected or nonaffected units), 
    or when the flue gases utilize two or more ducts feeding into a single 
    stack and the owner or operator chooses to monitor in the ducts rather 
    than the stack, the owner or operator shall either:
        (1) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in each duct 
    feeding into the stack or stacks and determine SO2 mass emissions 
    from each affected unit as the sum of the SO2 mass emissions 
    recorded for each duct; or
        (2) Install, certify, operate, and maintain an SO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system and flow monitoring system in each stack. 
    Determine SO2 mass emissions from each affected unit as the sum of 
    the SO2 mass emissions recorded for each stack, except that where 
    another unit also exhausts flue gases to one or more of the stacks, the 
    owner or operator shall also comply with the applicable common stack 
    requirements of this section to determine and record SO2 mass 
    emissions from the units using that stack.
        (e) Heat input. The owner or operator of an affected unit using a 
    common stack, bypass stack, or multiple stacks shall account for heat 
    input according to the following:
        (1) The owner or operator of an affected unit using a common stack, 
    bypass stack, or multiple stack with a diluent monitor and a flow 
    monitor on each stack may choose to determine the heat input for the 
    affected unit, wherever flow and diluent monitor measurements are used 
    to determine the heat input, using the procedures specified in 
    paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, except that the terms 
    ``SO2 mass emissions'' and ``emissions'' are replaced with the 
    term ``heat input'' and the phrase ``SO2 continuous emission 
    monitoring system and flow monitoring system'' is replaced with the 
    phrase ``a diluent monitor and a flow monitor''.
        (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(1) of this section, for any 
    common stack where any unit utilizing the common stack has a NOX 
    emission limitation pursuant to Section 407(b) of the Act, the owner or 
    operator shall not combine heat input for compliance purposes and shall 
    determine heat input for that unit separately.
        (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (e)(1) of this section, during the 
    period prior to January 1, 2000, the owner or operator shall not 
    combine heat input for units utilizing a common stack in order to 
    determine heat input for each unit for purposes of Sec. 75.10.
        (4) In the event that an owner or operator of a unit with a bypass 
    stack does not install and certify a diluent monitor and flow 
    monitoring system in a bypass stack, the owner or operator shall 
    determine total heat input to the unit for each unit operating hour 
    during which the bypass stack is used according to the missing data 
    provisions for heat input under Sec. 75.36 or the procedures for 
    calculating heat input from fuel sampling and analysis in section 5.5 
    of appendix F of this part.
        20. Section 75.17 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2)(i)(B), 
    adding paragraph (a)(2)(i)(C), removing paragraph (c), redesignating 
    paragraph (d) as paragraph (c), and revising the newly designated 
    paragraph (c) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.17  Specific provisions for monitoring emissions from common, 
    by-pass, and multiple stacks for NOX emission rate.
    
        (a) * * *
        (2) * * *
        (i) * * *
        (B) Each unit will comply with the applicable NOX emission 
    limitation by averaging its emissions with the other unit(s) utilizing 
    the common stack, pursuant to the emissions averaging plan submitted 
    under part 76 of this chapter; or
        (C) Each unit's compliance with the applicable NOX emission 
    limit will be determined by a method satisfactory to the Administrator 
    for apportioning to each of the units the combined NOX emission 
    rate (in lb/mmBtu) measured in the common stack, as provided in a 
    petition submitted by the designated representative. The Administrator 
    may approve such demonstrated substitute methods for apportioning 
    NOX emission rate measured in a common stack whenever the 
    demonstration ensures complete and accurate estimation of all emissions 
    regulated under this part.
    * * * * *
        (c) Unit with multiple stacks or bypass stack. When the flue gases 
    from an affected unit utilize two or more ducts feeding into two or 
    more stacks (that may include flue gases from other affected or 
    nonaffected units), or when flue gases utilize two or more ducts 
    feeding into a single stack and the owner or operator chooses to 
    monitor in the ducts rather than the stack, the owner or operator shall 
    monitor the NOX emission rate representative of each affected 
    unit. Where another unit also exhausts flue gases to one or more of the 
    stacks where monitoring systems are installed, the owner or operator 
    shall also comply with the applicable common stack monitoring 
    requirements of this section. The owner or operator shall either:
        (1) Install, certify, operate, and maintain a NOX continuous 
    emission monitoring system in each stack or duct and determine the 
    NOX emission rate for the unit as the Btu-weighted sum of the 
    NOX emission rates measured in the stacks or ducts using the heat 
    input estimation procedures in appendix F of this part; or
        (2) Install, certify, operate, and maintain a NOX continuous 
    emission monitoring system in one stack or duct [[Page 26524]] from 
    each affected unit and record the monitored value as the NOX 
    emission rate for the unit. The owner or operator shall account for 
    NOX emissions from the unit during all times when the unit 
    combusts fuel.
        21. Section 75.18 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.18  Specific provisions for monitoring emissions from common 
    and by-pass stacks for opacity.
    
        (a) * * *
        (b) Unit using bypass stack. Where any portion of the flue gases 
    from an affected unit can be routed so as to bypass the installed 
    continuous opacity monitoring system, the owner or operator shall 
    install, certify, operate, and maintain a certified continuous opacity 
    monitoring system on each bypass stack flue, duct, or stack gas stream 
    unless either:
        (1) An applicable Federal, State, or local opacity regulation or 
    permit exempts the unit from a requirement to install a continuous 
    opacity monitoring system in the bypass stack; or
        (2) A continuous opacity monitoring system is already installed and 
    certified at the inlet of the add-on emissions controls; or
        (3) The owner or operator monitors opacity using Method 9 of 
    appendix A, part 60 of this chapter whenever emissions pass through the 
    bypass stack.
    
    Subpart C--Operation and Maintenance Requirements
    
        22. Section 75.20 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) 
    introductory text, (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4) introductory text, 
    (a)(4)(iii), (a)(4)(iv), (a)(5), (b), the last sentence of paragraph 
    (c) introductory text, (c)(1)(v), (c)(2)(ii), (c)(2)(iii), (c)(4), 
    (c)(5) introductory text, (c)(5)(iv), (c)(6)(i), (c)(8), (d), (f) 
    introductory text, (f)(1), the last sentence of paragraph (f)(2), 
    (f)(3) and (g), by adding a new sentence at the end of paragraph 
    (f)(2), and by removing paragraph (c)(9) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.20  Certification and recertification procedures.
    
        (a) Initial certification approval process. The owner or operator 
    shall ensure that each continuous emission or opacity monitoring system 
    required by this part, which includes the automated data acquisition 
    and handling system, and, where applicable, the CO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system, meets the initial certification 
    requirements of this section and shall ensure that all applicable 
    certification tests under paragraph (c) of this section are completed 
    by the deadlines specified in Sec. 75.4 and prior to use in the Acid 
    Rain Program. In addition, whenever the owner or operator installs a 
    continuous emission or opacity monitoring system in order to meet the 
    requirements of Secs. 75.13 through 75.18 where no continuous emission 
    or opacity monitoring system was previously installed, initial 
    certification is required.
        (1) Notification of initial certification test dates. The owner or 
    operator or designated representative shall submit a written notice of 
    the dates of initial certification testing at the unit as specified in 
    Sec. 75.60 and Sec. 75.61(a)(1)(i).
        (2) Certification application. The owner or operator shall apply 
    for certification of each continuous emission or opacity monitoring 
    system used under the Acid Rain Program. The owner or operator shall 
    submit the certification application in accordance with Sec. 75.60 and 
    each complete certification application shall include the information 
    specified in Sec. 75.63.
        (3) Provisional approval of certification applications. Upon the 
    successful completion of the required certification procedures of this 
    section for each continuous emission or opacity monitoring system or 
    component thereof, each continuous emission or opacity monitoring 
    system or component thereof shall be deemed provisionally certified for 
    use under the Acid Rain Program for a period not to exceed 120 days 
    following receipt by the Administrator of the complete certification 
    application under paragraph (a)(4) of this section; provided that no 
    continuous emission or opacity monitor systems for a combustion source 
    seeking to enter the Opt-in Program in accordance with part 74 of this 
    chapter shall be deemed provisionally certified for use under the Acid 
    Rain Program. Data measured and recorded by a provisionally certified 
    continuous emission or opacity monitoring system or component thereof, 
    in accordance with the requirements of appendix B of this part, will be 
    considered valid quality-assured data (retroactive to the date and time 
    of successful completion of all certification tests), provided that the 
    Administrator does not invalidate the provisional certification by 
    issuing a notice of disapproval within 120 days of receipt of the 
    complete certification application.
        (4) Certification application formal approval process. The 
    Administrator will issue a written notice of approval or disapproval of 
    the certification application to the owner or operator within 120 days 
    of receipt of the complete certification application. In the event the 
    Administrator does not issue such a written notice within 120 days of 
    receipt, each continuous emission or opacity monitoring system which 
    meets the performance requirements of this part and is included in the 
    certification application will be deemed certified for use under the 
    Acid Rain Program.
    * * * * *
        (iii) Disapproval notice. If the certification application is 
    complete but shows that any continuous emission or opacity monitoring 
    system or component thereof does not meet the performance requirements 
    of this part, the Administrator shall issue a written notice of 
    disapproval of the certification application within 120 days of 
    receipt. By issuing the notice of disapproval, the provisional 
    certification is invalidated by the Administrator, and the data 
    measured and recorded by each uncertified continuous emission or 
    opacity monitoring system or component thereof shall not be considered 
    valid quality-assured data from the date and time of completion of the 
    invalid certification tests until the date and time that the owner or 
    operator completes subsequently approved initial certification tests. 
    The owner or operator shall follow the procedures for loss of 
    certification in paragraph (a)(5) of this section for each continuous 
    emission or opacity monitoring system or component thereof which was 
    disapproved.
        (iv) Audit decertification. The Administrator may issue a notice of 
    disapproval of the certification status of a continuous emission or 
    opacity monitoring system or component thereof, in accordance with 
    Sec. 75.21.
        (5) Procedures for loss of certification. When the Administrator 
    issues a notice of disapproval of a certification application or a 
    notice of disapproval of certification status (as specified in 
    paragraph (a)(4) of this section), then:
        (i) The owner or operator shall substitute the following values, as 
    applicable, for each hour of unit operation during the period of 
    invalid data specified in paragraph (a)(4)(iii) of this section or in 
    Sec. 75.21: the maximum potential concentration of SO2 as defined 
    in section 2.1 of appendix A of this part to report SO2 
    concentration; the maximum potential NOX emission rate, as defined 
    in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter to report NOX emissions, the maximum 
    potential flow rate, as defined in section 2.1 of appendix A of this 
    part to report volumetric flow, or the maximum CO2 concentration 
    used to determine the maximum potential concentration of SO2 in 
    section 2.1.1.1 of appendix A of [[Page 26525]] this part to report 
    CO2 concentration data until such time, date, and hour as the 
    continuous emission monitoring system or component thereof can be 
    adjusted, repaired, or replaced and certification tests successfully 
    completed; and
        (ii) The designated representative shall submit a notification of 
    certification retest dates as specified in Sec. 75.61(a)(1)(ii) and a 
    new certification application according to the procedures in paragraph 
    (a)(2) of this section; and
        (iii) The owner or operator shall repeat all certification tests or 
    other requirements that were failed by the continuous emission or 
    opacity monitoring system, as indicated in the Administrator's notice 
    of disapproval, no later than 30 unit operating days after the date of 
    issuance of the notice of disapproval.
        (b) Recertification approval process. Whenever the owner or 
    operator makes a replacement, modification, or change in the certified 
    continuous emission monitoring system or continuous opacity monitoring 
    system (which includes the automated data acquisition and handling 
    system, and, where applicable, the CO2 continuous emission 
    monitoring system), that significantly affects the ability of the 
    system to measure or record the SO2 concentration, volumetric gas 
    flow, SO2 mass emissions, NOX emission rate, CO2 
    concentration, or opacity, or to meet the requirements of Sec. 75.21 or 
    appendix B of this part, the owner or operator shall recertify the 
    continuous emission monitoring system, continuous opacity monitoring 
    system, or component thereof according to the procedures in this 
    paragraph. Examples of changes which require recertification include: 
    replacement of the analytical method, including the analyzer; change in 
    location or orientation of the sampling probe or site; rebuilding of 
    the analyzer or all monitoring system equipment; and replacement of an 
    existing continuous emission monitoring system or continuous opacity 
    monitoring system. In addition, if a continuous emission monitoring 
    system is not operating for more than two calendar years, then the 
    owner or operator shall recertify the continuous emission monitoring 
    system. The Administrator may determine whether a replacement, 
    modification or change in a monitoring system significantly affects the 
    ability of the monitoring system to measure or record the SO2 
    concentration, volumetric gas flow, SO2 mass emissions, NOX 
    emission rate, CO2 concentration, or opacity. Furthermore, 
    whenever the owner or operator makes a replacement, modification, or 
    change to the flue gas handling system or the unit operation that 
    significantly changes the flow or concentration profile or opacity of 
    monitored emissions, the owner or operator shall recertify the 
    continuous emission or opacity monitoring system or component thereof 
    according to the procedures in this paragraph. Recertification is not 
    required prior to use of a non-redundant backup continuous emission 
    monitoring system in cases where all of the following conditions have 
    been met: the non-redundant backup continuous emission monitoring 
    system has previously been certified at the same sampling location; all 
    components of the non-redundant backup continuous emission monitoring 
    system have previously been certified; and component monitors of the 
    non-redundant backup continuous emission monitoring system pass a 
    linearity check (for pollutant concentration monitors) or a calibration 
    error test (for flow monitors) prior to their use for monitoring of 
    emissions or flow. In addition, changes resulting from routine or 
    normal corrective maintenance and/or quality assurance activities do 
    not require recertification, nor do software modifications in the 
    automated data acquisition and handling system, where the modification 
    is only for the purpose of generating additional or modified reports 
    for the State Implementation Plan or for reporting requirements under 
    subpart G of this part.
        (1) Tests required. For recertification testing, the owner or 
    operator shall complete all certification tests in paragraph (c) of 
    this section applicable to the monitoring system, except as approved by 
    the Administrator. Such approval may be obtained by petition under 
    Sec. 75.66 or may be provided in written guidance from the 
    Administrator.
        (2) Notification of recertification test dates. The owner or 
    operator or designated representative shall submit notice of testing 
    dates for recertification under this paragraph as specified in 
    Sec. 75.61(a)(1)(ii), unless such testing is required as a result of a 
    change in the flue gas handling system, a change in location or 
    orientation of the sampling probe or site, or the planned replacement 
    of a continuous emission or opacity monitoring system or component 
    thereof. In such cases, the owner or operator shall provide notice in 
    accordance with the notice provisions for initial certification testing 
    in Sec. 75.61(a)(1)(i).
        (3) Substitution of missing data. (i) The owner or operator shall 
    substitute for missing data during the period following the 
    replacement, modification, or change to the monitoring system up to the 
    time of successful completion of all recertification testing according 
    to the standard missing data procedures in Secs. 75.33 through 75.36, 
    and shall use the standard missing data substitution procedures for all 
    missing data periods following the recertification, except as provided 
    below.
        (ii) If the replacement, modification, or change is such that the 
    data collected by the prior certified monitoring system are no longer 
    representative, such as after a change to the flue gas handling system 
    or unit operation that requires changing the span value to be 
    consistent with Section 2.1 of appendix A of this part, the owner or 
    operator must also substitute the appropriate one of the following 
    values: for a change that results in a significantly higher 
    concentration or flow rate, substitute maximum potential values 
    according to the procedures in paragraph (a)(5) of this section during 
    the period following the replacement, modification, or change up to the 
    time of the successful completion of all recertification testing; or 
    for a change that results in a significantly lower concentration or 
    flow rate, substitute data using the standard missing data procedures 
    during the period following the replacement, modification, or change up 
    to the time of the successful completion of all recertification 
    testing. The owner or operator shall then use the initial missing data 
    procedures in Sec. 75.31 following provisional certification, unless 
    otherwise provided by Sec. 75.34 for units with add-on emission 
    controls.
        (4) Recertification application. The designated representative 
    shall apply for recertification of a continuous emission or opacity 
    monitoring system used under the Acid Rain Program according to the 
    procedures in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. Each complete 
    recertification application shall include the information specified in 
    Sec. 75.63 of this part.
        (5) Approval/disapproval of request for recertification. The 
    procedures for provisional certification in paragraph (a)(3) of this 
    section shall apply. The Administrator will issue a written notice of 
    approval or disapproval according to the procedures in paragraph (a)(4) 
    of this section, except that the period for the Administrator's review 
    provided under paragraph (a)(4) of this section shall not exceed 60 
    days following receipt of the complete recertification application by 
    the Administrator. The missing data substitution procedures under 
    paragraph (b)(3) of this section shall [[Page 26526]] apply in the 
    event of a loss of recertification.
        (c) * * * Except as specified in paragraphs (b)(1), (d) and (e) of 
    this section, the owner or operator shall perform the following tests 
    for initial certification or recertification of continuous emission or 
    opacity monitoring systems or components according to the requirements 
    of appendix A of this part:
        (1) * * *
        (v) A cycle time test.
        (2) * * *
        (ii) Relative accuracy test audits at three flue gas velocities; 
    and
        (iii) A bias test (at normal operating load).
        (3) * * *
        (4) The certification test data from an O2 or a CO2 
    diluent gas monitor certified for use in a NOX continuous emission 
    monitoring system may be submitted to meet the requirements of 
    Sec. 75.20(c)(5).
        (5) For each CO2 pollutant concentration monitor or O2 
    monitor which is part of a CO2 continuous emission monitoring 
    system or is used to monitor heat input and for each SO2-diluent 
    continuous emission monitoring system:
    * * * * *
        (iv) A cycle-time test.
        (6) * * *
        (i) Performance of the tests for certification or recertification, 
    according to the requirements of Performance Specification 1 in 
    appendix B to part 60 of this chapter.
    * * * * *
        (8) The owner or operator shall provide, or cause to be provided, 
    adequate facilities for certification or recertification testing that 
    include:
        (i) Sampling ports adequate for test methods applicable to such 
    facility, such that:
        (A) Volumetric flow rate, pollutant concentration, and pollutant 
    emission rates can be accurately determined by applicable test methods 
    and procedures; and
        (B) A stack or duct free of cyclonic flow during performance tests 
    is available, as demonstrated by applicable test methods and 
    procedures.
        (ii) Basic facilities (e.g., electricity) for sampling and testing 
    equipment.
        (d) Certification/recertification procedures for optional backup 
    continuous emission monitoring systems--(1) Redundant backups. The 
    owner or operator of an optional redundant backup continuous emission 
    monitoring system shall comply with all the requirements for initial 
    certification and recertification according to the procedures specified 
    in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section. The owner or operator 
    shall operate the redundant backup continuous emission monitoring 
    system during all periods of unit operation, except for periods of 
    calibration, quality assurance, maintenance, or repair. The owner or 
    operator shall perform upon the redundant backup continuous emission 
    monitoring system all quality assurance and quality control procedures 
    specified in appendix B of this part.
        (2) Non-redundant backups. The owner or operator of an optional 
    non-redundant backup continuous emission monitoring system shall comply 
    with all the requirements for initial certification and recertification 
    according to the procedures specified in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of 
    this section for each non-redundant backup continuous emission 
    monitoring system, except that: the owner or operator of a non-
    redundant backup continuous emission monitoring system may omit the 7-
    day calibration error test for certification or recertification of an 
    SO2 pollutant concentration monitor, flow monitor, NOX 
    pollutant concentration monitor, or diluent gas monitor, provided the 
    non-redundant backup system is not used for reporting on any affected 
    unit for more than 720 hours in any calendar year. In addition, the 
    owner or operator shall ensure that the certified non-redundant backup 
    continuous emission monitoring system passes a linearity check (for 
    pollutant concentration monitors) or a calibration error test (for flow 
    monitors) prior to each use for recording and reporting emissions and 
    complies with the daily and quarterly quality assurance and quality 
    control requirements in appendix B of this part for each day and 
    quarter that the non-redundant backup monitoring system is used to 
    report data. If the owner or operator does not perform semi-annual or 
    annual relative accuracy test audits upon the non-redundant backup 
    continuous emission monitoring system, then the owner or operator shall 
    recertify the non-redundant continuous emission monitoring system once 
    every two calendar years, performing all certification tests applicable 
    under this paragraph. However, if a non-redundant backup system is used 
    for reporting data from any affected unit or common stack for more than 
    720 hours in any one calendar year, then reported data after the first 
    720 hours is not valid, quality-assured data unless the owner or 
    operator has ensured that the non-redundant backup monitoring system 
    has also passed the 7-day calibration error test, before data is 
    recorded for any period in excess of 720 hours for that calendar year 
    for that monitoring system.
        (3) Reference method backups. A monitoring system that is operated 
    as a reference method backup system pursuant to the reference method 
    requirements of Methods 2, 6C, 7E, or 3A in appendix A of part 60 of 
    this chapter need not perform and pass the certification tests required 
    by paragraph (c) of this section prior to its use pursuant to this 
    paragraph.
    * * * * *
        (f) Certification/recertification procedures for alternative 
    monitoring systems. The designated representative representing the 
    owner or operator of each alternative monitoring system approved by the 
    Administrator as equivalent to or better than a continuous emission 
    monitoring system according to the criteria and procedures in subpart E 
    of this part shall apply for certification to the Administrator prior 
    to use of the system under the Acid Rain Program, and shall apply for 
    recertification to the Administrator following a replacement, 
    modification, or change by performing all of the tests under paragraph 
    (c) of this section that can be applied to the alternative monitoring 
    system. The owner or operator of an alternative monitoring system shall 
    comply with the notification and application requirements for 
    certification or recertification according to the procedures specified 
    in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this section.
        (1) Each alternative monitoring system shall be certified by the 
    Administrator before it may be authorized for use under the Acid Rain 
    Program.
        (i) Certification testing notification. The designated 
    representative shall provide certification testing notification 
    according to the procedures in subparagraph (a)(1) of this section 
    prior to conducting certification testing.
        (ii) Monitoring plan. The designated representative shall submit an 
    initial monitoring plan at least 45 days prior to the first day of 
    certification testing.
        (iii) Certification application. The designated representative 
    shall submit a certification application for the alternative monitoring 
    system prior to use in the Acid Rain Program. Each complete 
    certification application shall include:
        (A) Information and test results for the relative accuracy test and 
    any other applicable tests in paragraph (c) of this section;
        (B) A revised monitoring plan; and
        (C) Results of the tests for verification of the accuracy of 
    emissions calculations and missing data [[Page 26527]] procedures 
    performed by the automated data acquisition and handling system.
        (2) * * * The procedures for provisional certification under 
    paragraph (a)(3) of this section and for a 120-day EPA review period 
    for initial certification under paragraph (a)(4) of this section shall 
    apply to alternative monitoring systems, provided that the 
    Administrator has already approved the petition or petitions required 
    under subpart E of this part. The designated representative shall 
    report no data from an alternative monitoring system in a quarterly 
    report from a period prior to both Administrator approval of the 
    petition or petitions under subpart E of this part and also successful 
    completion of certification testing.
        (3) The recertification requirements of paragraph (b) of this 
    section shall apply to alternative monitoring systems, except that the 
    owner or operator shall perform the tests specified under paragraph 
    (f)(1)(iii) of this section.
        (g) Certification procedures for excepted monitoring systems under 
    appendices D and E. The owner or operator of a gas-fired unit, oil-
    fired unit, or diesel-fired unit using the optional protocol under 
    appendix D or E of this part shall ensure that an excepted monitoring 
    system under appendix D or E of this part meets the applicable general 
    operating requirements of Sec. 75.10, the applicable requirements of 
    appendices D and E to this part, and the certification requirements of 
    this paragraph.
        (1) Certification testing. The owner or operator shall use the 
    following procedures for certification of an excepted monitoring system 
    under appendix D or E of this part.
        (i) When the optional SO2 mass emissions estimation procedure 
    in appendix D of this part or the optional NOX emissions 
    estimation protocol in appendix E of this part is used, the owner or 
    operator shall provide data from a calibration test for each fuel 
    flowmeter according to the appropriate calibration procedures using one 
    of the following standard methods: ASME MFC-3M-1989 with September 1990 
    Errata, ``Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes Using Orifice, Nozzle, and 
    Venturi'', ASME MFC-4M-1986 (Reaffirmed 1990) ``Measurement of Gas Flow 
    by Turbine Meters'', ASME MFC-5M-1985 ``Measurement of Liquid Flow in 
    Closed Conduits Using Transit-Time Ultrasonic Flowmeters'', ASME MFC-
    6M-1987 with June 1987 Errata, ``Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes 
    Using Vortex Flow Meters'', ASME MFC-7M-1987 (Reaffirmed 1992), 
    ``Measurement of Gas Flow by Means of Critical Flow Venturi Nozzles'', 
    ASME MFC-9M-1988 with December 1989 Errata, ``Measurement of Liquid 
    Flow in Closed Conduits by Weighing Method'', ISO 8316: 1987(E) 
    ``Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits--Method by Collection 
    of the Liquid in a Volumetric Tank'', or American Gas Association 
    Report No. 3: Orifice Metering of Natural Gas and Other Related 
    Hydrocarbon Fluids Part 1: General Equations and Uncertainty Guidelines 
    (October 1990 Edition), Part 2: Specification and Installation 
    Requirements (February 1991 Edition) and Part 3: Natural Gas 
    Applications (August 1992 Edition), excluding the modified calculation 
    procedures of Part 3, as required by appendices D and E of this part 
    (all methods incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6). The 
    Administrator may also approve other procedures that use equipment 
    traceable to National Institute of Standards of Technology (NIST) 
    standards. The designated representative shall document the procedure 
    and the equipment used in the monitoring plan for the unit and in a 
    petition submitted in accordance with Sec. 75.66(c).
        (ii) For the automated data acquisition and handling system used 
    under either the optional SO2 mass emissions estimation procedure 
    in appendix D of this part or the optional NOX emissions 
    estimation protocol in appendix E of this part, the owner or operator 
    shall perform tests designed to verify:
        (A) The proper computation of hourly averages for pollutant 
    concentrations, fuel flow rates, emission rates, heat input, and 
    pollutant mass emissions; and
        (B) Proper computation and application of the missing data 
    substitution procedures in appendix D or E of this part.
        (iii) When the optional NOX emissions protocol in appendix E 
    is used, the owner or operator shall complete all initial performance 
    testing under section 2.1 of appendix E.
        (2) Certification testing notification. The designated 
    representative shall provide initial certification testing notification 
    and periodic retesting notification for an excepted monitoring system 
    under appendix E of this part as specified in Sec. 75.61. The 
    designated representative shall submit recertification testing 
    notification as specified in Sec. 75.61 for quality assurance/quality 
    control-related NOX emission rate testing under section 2.3 of 
    appendix E of this part for an excepted monitoring system under 
    appendix E of this part. Certification testing notification or periodic 
    retesting notification is not required for testing of a fuel flowmeter 
    or testing for an excepted monitoring system under appendix D of this 
    part.
        (3) Monitoring plan. The designated representative shall submit an 
    initial monitoring plan in accordance with Sec. 75.62(a).
        (4) Certification application. The designated representative shall 
    submit a certification application in accordance with Secs. 75.60 and 
    75.63.
        (5) Provisional approval of certification applications. Upon the 
    successful completion of the required certification procedures for each 
    excepted monitoring system under appendix D or E of this part, each 
    excepted monitoring system under appendix D or E of this part shall be 
    deemed provisionally certified for use under the Acid Rain Program 
    during the period for the Administrator's review. The provisions for 
    the certification application formal approval process in paragraph 
    (a)(4) of this section shall apply. Data measured and recorded by a 
    provisionally certified excepted monitoring system under appendix D or 
    E of this part, will be considered quality-assured data from the date 
    and time of completion of the final certification test, provided that 
    the Administrator does not revoke the provisional certification by 
    issuing a notice of disapproval within 120 days of receipt of the 
    complete certification application in accordance with the provisions in 
    paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
        23. Section 75.21 is amended by adding paragraphs (d) and (e) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.21  Quality assurance and quality control requirements.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) Notification for periodic relative accuracy test audits. The 
    owner or operator or the designated representative shall submit a 
    written notice of the dates of relative accuracy testing as specified 
    in Sec. 75.61.
        (e) Consequences of audits. The owner or operator shall invalidate 
    data from a continuous emission monitoring system or continuous opacity 
    monitoring system upon failure of an audit under paragraph (a)(1)(iv) 
    of Sec. 75.20, under appendix B of this part, or any other audit, 
    beginning with the unit operating hour of completion of a failed audit 
    as determined by the Administrator. The owner or operator shall not use 
    invalidated data for reporting emissions or heat input, nor for 
    calculations of monitor data availability.
        (1) Audit decertification. Whenever both: an audit (including 
    audits required under appendix B of this part) [[Page 26528]] of a 
    continuous emission or opacity monitoring system or component thereof, 
    including the data acquisition and handling system, and a review of the 
    initial certification application or recertification application, 
    reveal that any continuous emission or opacity monitoring system or 
    component should not have been certified because it did not meet a 
    particular performance specification or other requirement of this part 
    both at the time of the certification application submission and at the 
    time of the audit, the Administrator will issue a notice of disapproval 
    of the certification status of such system or component. By issuing the 
    notice of disapproval, the certification status is revoked, 
    prospectively, by the Administrator. The data measured and recorded by 
    each continuous emission or opacity monitoring system shall not be 
    considered valid quality-assured data from the date of issuance of the 
    notification of the revoked certification status until the date and 
    time that the owner or operator completes subsequently approved 
    certification tests. The owner or operator shall follow the procedures 
    for loss of certification in Sec. 75.20(a)(5) for initial certification 
    or Sec. 75.20(b)(3) for recertification to replace, prospectively, all 
    of the invalid, non-quality-assured data for each disapproved 
    continuous emission or opacity monitoring system.
        (2) Out-of-control period. Whenever a continuous emission 
    monitoring system or continuous opacity monitoring system fails a 
    periodic quality assurance audit, an audit under Sec. 75.20(a)(1)(iv), 
    a field audit from EPA personnel or other audit, the system is out-of-
    control. The owner or operator shall follow the procedures for out-of-
    control periods in Sec. 75.24.
        24. Section 75.22 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) 
    introductory text, (a)(5), and (a)(6) and by adding paragraphs (b) and 
    (c) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.22  Reference test methods.
    
        (a) The owner or operator shall use the following methods included 
    in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter to conduct monitoring system 
    tests for certification or recertification of continuous emission 
    monitoring systems and excepted monitoring systems under appendix E of 
    this part and quality assurance and quality control procedures.
    * * * * *
        (5) Methods 6, 6A, 6B or 6C, and 7, 7A, 7C, 7D or 7E, as 
    applicable, are the reference methods for determining SO2 and 
    NOX pollutant concentrations. (Methods 6A and 6B may also be used 
    to determine SO2 emission rate in lb/mmBtu. Methods 7, 7A, 7C, 7D, 
    or 7E must be used to measure total NOX emissions, both NO and 
    NO2, for purposes of this part. The owner or operator shall not 
    use the exception in section 5.1.2 of Method 7E.)
        (6) Method 20 is the reference method for determining NOX and 
    diluent emissions from stationary gas turbines for testing under 
    appendix E of this part.
        (b) The owner or operator may use the following methods in Appendix 
    A of part 60 of this chapter as a reference method backup monitoring 
    system to provide quality-assured monitor data:
        (1) Method 3A for determining O2 or CO2 concentration;
        (2) Method 6C for determining SO2 concentration;
        (3) Method 7E for determining total NOX concentration (both NO 
    and NO2); and
        (4) Method 2 for determining volumetric flow. The sample point(s) 
    for reference methods shall be located according to the provisions of 
    section 6.5.5 of appendix A of this part.
        (c) (1) Performance tests shall be conducted and data reduced in 
    accordance with the test methods and procedures of this part unless the 
    Administrator:
        (i) Specifies or approves, in specific cases, the use of a 
    reference method with minor changes in methodology;
        (ii) Approves the use of an equivalent method; or
        (iii) Approves shorter sampling times and smaller sample volumes 
    when necessitated by process variables or other factors.
        (2) Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to abrogate the 
    Administrator's authority to require testing under Section 114 of the 
    Act.
        25. Section 75.23 is revised to read as follows:
    Sec. 75.23  Alternatives to standards incorporated by reference.
    
        (a) The designated representative of a unit may petition the 
    Administrator for an alternative to any standard incorporated by 
    reference and prescribed in this part in accordance with Sec. 75.66(c).
        (b) (reserved)
        26. Section 75.24 is amended by revising paragraphs (d) and (e) 
    introductory text to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.24  Out-of-control periods.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) When the bias test indicates that an SO2 monitor, 
    volumetric flow monitor, or NOX continuous emission monitoring 
    system is biased low (i.e., the arithmetic mean of the differences 
    between the reference method value and the monitor or monitoring system 
    measurements in a relative accuracy test audit exceed the bias 
    statistic in section 7 of appendix A to this part), the owner or 
    operator shall adjust the monitor or continuous emission monitoring 
    system to eliminate the cause of bias such that it passes the bias test 
    or calculate and use the bias adjustment factor as specified in section 
    2.3.3 of appendix B to this part and in accordance with Sec. 75.7.
        (e) The owner or operator shall determine if a continuous opacity 
    monitoring system is out-of-control and shall take appropriate 
    corrective actions according to the procedures specified for State 
    Implementation Plans, pursuant to appendix M of part 51 of this 
    chapter. The owner or operator shall comply with the monitor data 
    availability requirements of the State. If the State has no monitor 
    data availability requirements for continuous opacity monitoring 
    systems, then the owner or operator shall comply with the monitor data 
    availability requirements as stated in the data capture provisions of 
    appendix M, part 51 of this chapter.
    
    Subpart D--Missing Data Substitution Procedures
    
        27. Section 75.30 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.30  General provisions.
    
        (a) Except as provided in Sec. 75.34, the owner or operator shall 
    provide substitute data for each affected unit using a continuous 
    emission monitoring system according to the missing data procedures in 
    this subpart whenever the unit combusts any fuel and:
        (1) A valid, quality-assured hour of SO2 concentration data 
    (in ppm) has not been measured and recorded for an affected unit by a 
    certified SO2 pollutant concentration monitor, or by an approved 
    alternative monitoring method under subpart E of this part, except as 
    provided in paragraph (d) of this section; or
        (2) A valid, quality-assured hour of flow data (in scfh) has not 
    been measured and recorded for an affected unit from a certified flow 
    monitor, or by an approved alternative monitoring system under subpart 
    E of this part; or
        (3) A valid, quality-assured hour of NOX emission rate data 
    (in lb/mmBtu) has not been measured and recorded for an affected unit 
    by a certified NOX continuous emission monitoring system, or by an 
    approved alternative monitoring system under subpart E of this part; or
        (4) A valid, quality-assured hour of CO2 concentration data 
    (in percent CO2, [[Page 26529]] or percent O2 converted to 
    percent CO2 using the procedures in appendix F of this part) has 
    not been measured and recorded for an affected unit by a certified 
    CO2 continuous emission monitoring system, or by an approved 
    alternative monitoring method under subpart E of this part.
        (b) However, the owner or operator shall have no need to provide 
    substitute data according to the missing data procedures in this 
    subpart if the owner or operator uses SO2 or CO2 (or O2) 
    concentration, flow, or NOX emission rate data recorded from 
    either a certified redundant or non-redundant backup continuous 
    emission monitor or a backup reference method monitoring system when 
    the certified primary monitor is not operating or out-of-control. A 
    redundant or non-redundant backup continuous emission monitoring system 
    must have been certified according to the procedures in Sec. 75.20 
    prior to the missing data period. Non-redundant backup continuous 
    emission monitoring system must pass a linearity check (for pollutant 
    concentration monitors) or a calibration error test (for flow monitors) 
    prior to each period of use of the certified backup monitor for 
    recording and reporting emissions. Use of a certified backup monitoring 
    system or backup reference method monitoring system is optional and at 
    the discretion of the owner or operator.
        (c) When the certified primary monitor is not operating or out-of-
    control, then data recorded for an affected unit from a certified 
    backup continuous emission monitor or backup reference method 
    monitoring system are used, as if such data were from the certified 
    primary monitor, to calculate monitor data availability in Sec. 75.32, 
    and to provide the quality-assured data used in the missing data 
    procedures in Secs. 75.31 and 75.33, such as the ``hour after'' value.
        (d) [Reserved]
        (e) [Reserved]
        28. Section 75.31 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b) and 
    (c)(3) to read as follows:
    Sec. 75.31  Initial missing data procedures.
    
        (a) During the first 720 quality-assured monitor operating hours 
    following initial certification (i.e., following the date and time of 
    completion of successful certification tests), of the SO2 and 
    CO2 (or O2) pollutant concentration monitor and during the 
    first 2,160 quality-assured monitor operating hours following initial 
    certification of the flow monitor and NOX continuous emission 
    monitoring system(s), the owner or operator shall provide substitute 
    data required under this subpart according to the procedures in 
    paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. The owner or operator of a unit 
    shall use these procedures for no longer than three years (26,280 clock 
    hours) following initial certification.
        (b) SO2 or CO2 (or O2) concentration data. For each 
    hour of missing SO2 or CO2 concentration data (including 
    CO2 data converted from O2 data using the procedures in 
    appendix F of this part) or O2 concentration data used to 
    calculate heat input, the owner or operator shall calculate the 
    substitute data as follows:
        (1) Whenever prior quality-assured data exist, the owner or 
    operator shall substitute, by means of the data acquisition and 
    handling system, the average of the hourly SO2 or CO2 (or 
    O2) concentrations recorded for an affected unit by a certified 
    monitor for the unit operating hour immediately before and the unit 
    operating hour immediately after the missing data period for each hour 
    of missing data.
        (2) Whenever no prior quality-assured SO2 or CO2 (or 
    O2) concentration data exist, the owner or operator shall 
    substitute the maximum potential concentration for SO2 or CO2 
    (or minimum O2 concentration, for determination of heat input), as 
    specified in section 2.1 of appendix A of this part, for each hour of 
    missing data.
        (c) * * *
        (3) Whenever no prior quality-assured flow or NOX emission 
    rate data exist for the corresponding load range, or any higher load 
    range, the owner or operator shall calculate and substitute the maximum 
    potential flow rate or shall substitute the maximum potential NOX 
    emission rate, as specified in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter and section 
    2.1 of appendix A, for each hour of missing data.
        29. Section 75.32 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) 
    introductory text, the first sentence of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) 
    and paragraph (b) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.32  Determination of monitor data availability for standard 
    missing data procedures.
    
        (a) Following initial certification, upon completion of the first 
    720 quality-assured monitor operating hours of the SO2 or CO2 
    (or O2) pollutant concentration monitor or the first 2,160 
    quality-assured monitor operating hours of the flow monitor or NOX 
    continuous emission monitoring system, the owner or operator shall 
    calculate and record, by means of the automated data acquisition and 
    handling system, the percent monitor data availability for the SO2 
    and CO2 (or O2) pollutant concentration monitor, the flow 
    monitor, the NOX continuous emission monitoring system as follows:
        (1) Prior to completion of 8,760 unit operating hours following 
    initial certification, the owner or operator shall, for the purpose of 
    applying the standard missing data procedures of Sec. 75.33, use 
    Equation 8 to calculate, hourly, percent monitor data availability. * * 
    *
        (2) Upon completion of 8,760 unit operating hours following initial 
    certification (or, for a unit with less than 8,760 unit operating hours 
    three years (26,280 clock hours) after initial certification, upon 
    completion of three years (26,280 clock hours) following initial 
    certification) and thereafter, the owner or operator shall, for the 
    purpose of applying the standard missing data procedures of Sec. 75.33, 
    use Equation 9 to calculate, hourly, percent monitor data availability. 
    * * *
        (3) * * *
        (b) The monitor data availability need not be calculated during the 
    missing data period. The owner or operator shall record the percent 
    monitor data availability for the last hour of each missing data period 
    as the monitor availability used to implement the missing data 
    substitution procedures.
        30. Section 75.33 is amended by adding a sentence to the end of 
    paragraph (a) and by adding paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.33  Standard missing data procedures.
    
        (a) * * * The owner or operator of a unit shall substitute for 
    missing data using only quality-assured monitor operating hours of data 
    from the three years (26,280 clock hours) prior to the date and time of 
    the missing data period. * * *
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (5) Whenever no proper quality-assured flow or NOX emission 
    rate data exist for either the corresponding load range or a higher 
    load range, the owner or operator shall substitute the maximum 
    potential NOX emission rate or the maximum potential flow rate, as 
    defined in section 2.1 of appendix A of this part.
    * * * * *
        31. Section 75.35 is added as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.35  Missing data procedures for CO2 data.
    
        (a) On or after January 1, 1996, the owner or operator of a unit 
    with a CO2 continuous emission monitoring system shall substitute 
    for missing CO2 concentration data using the procedures of this 
    section. Prior to January 1, 1996, the owner or operator of a unit with 
    a [[Page 26530]] CO2 continuous emission monitoring system may 
    substitute for missing CO2 concentration data using the procedures 
    of this section.
        (b) During the first 720 quality-assured monitor operating hours 
    following initial certification (i.e., following the date and time of 
    completion of successful certification tests), of the CO2 
    continuous emission monitoring system, the owner or operator shall 
    provide substitute data required under this subpart according to the 
    procedures in paragraph (b) of Sec. 75.31.
        (c) Upon completion of the first 720 quality-assured monitor 
    operating hours following initial certification of the CO2 
    continuous emission monitoring system, the owner or operator shall 
    provide substitute data for CO2 concentration or CO2 mass 
    emissions required under this subpart according to the procedures in 
    paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), or (c)(3) of this section, including 
    CO2 data calculated from O2 measurements using the procedures 
    in appendix F of this part.
        (1) Whenever a quality-assured monitoring operating hour of 
    CO2 concentration data has not been obtained and recorded for a 
    period less than or equal to 72 hours or for a missing data period 
    where the percent monitor data availability for the CO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system as of the last unit operating hour of the 
    previous calendar quarter was greater than or equal to 90.0 percent, 
    then the owner or operator shall substitute the average of the recorded 
    CO2 concentration for the hour before and the hour after the 
    missing data period for each hour in each missing data period.
        (2) Whenever no quality-assured CO2 concentration data are 
    available for a period of 72 consecutive unit operating hours or more, 
    the owner or operator shall begin substituting CO2 mass emissions 
    calculated using the procedures in appendix G of this part beginning 
    with the seventy-third hour of the missing data period until quality-
    assured CO2 concentration data are again available. The owner or 
    operator shall use the CO2 concentration from the hour before the 
    missing data period to substitute for hours 1 through 72 of the missing 
    data period.
        (3) Whenever no quality-assured CO2 concentration data are 
    available for a period where the percent monitor data availability for 
    the CO2 continuous emission monitoring system as of the last unit 
    operating hour of the previous calendar quarter was less than 90.0 
    percent, the owner or operator shall substitute CO2 mass emissions 
    calculated using the procedures in appendix G of this part for each 
    hour of the missing data period until quality-assured CO2 
    concentration data are again available.
        32. Section 75.36 is added as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.36  Missing data procedures for heat input.
    
        (a) On or after January 1, 1996, the owner or operator of a unit 
    monitoring heat input with a CO2 or O2 pollutant 
    concentration monitor and a flow monitoring system shall substitute for 
    missing heat input data using the procedures of this section. Prior to 
    January 1, 1996, the owner or operator of a unit monitoring heat input 
    with a CO2 or O2 pollutant concentration monitor and a flow 
    monitoring system may substitute for missing heat input data using the 
    procedures of this section.
        (b) During the first 720 quality-assured monitor operating hours 
    following initial certification (i.e., following the date and time of 
    completion of successful certification tests), of the CO2 or 
    O2 pollutant concentration monitor and during the first 2,160 
    quality-assured monitoring operating hours following initial 
    certification of the flow monitor, the owner or operator shall provide 
    substitute data for heat input calculated under section 5.2 of appendix 
    F of this part by substituting the CO2 or O2 concentration 
    measured or substituted according to paragraph (b) of Sec. 75.31, and 
    by substituting the flow rate measured or substituted according to 
    Sec. 75.31.
        (c) Upon completion of the first 720 quality-assured monitor 
    operating hours following initial certification of the CO2 (or O2) 
    pollutant concentration monitor, the owner or operator shall provide 
    substitute data for CO2 or O2 concentration to calculate heat 
    input or shall substitute heat input determined under appendix F of 
    this part according to the procedures in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), or 
    (c)(3) of this section. Upon completion of 2,160 quality-assured 
    monitor operating hours following initial certification of the flow 
    monitor, the owner or operator shall provide substitute data for 
    volumetric flow according to the procedures in Sec. 75.33 in order to 
    calculate heat input, unless required to determine heat input using the 
    fuel sampling procedures in appendix F of this part under paragraphs 
    (c)(1), (c)(2) or (c)(3) of this section.
        (1) Whenever a quality-assured monitor operating hour of CO2 
    or O2 concentration data has not been obtained and recorded for a 
    period less than or equal to 72 hours or for a missing data period 
    where the percent monitor data availability for the CO2 or O2 
    pollutant concentration monitor as of the last unit operating hour of 
    the previous calendar quarter was greater than or equal to 90.0 
    percent, the owner or operator shall substitute the average of the 
    recorded CO2 or O2 concentration for the hour before and the 
    hour after the missing data period for each hour in each missing data 
    period to calculate heat input.
        (2) Whenever a quality-assured monitor operating hour of CO2 
    or O2 concentration data has not been obtained and recorded for a 
    period of 72 consecutive unit operating hours or more, the owner or 
    operator shall begin substituting heat input calculated using the 
    procedures in section 5.5 of appendix F of this part beginning with the 
    seventy-third hour of the missing data period until quality-assured 
    CO2 or O2 concentration data are again available. The owner 
    or operator shall use the CO2 or O2 concentration from the 
    hour before the missing data period to substitute for hours 1 through 
    72 of the missing data period.
        (3) Whenever no quality-assured CO2 or O2 concentration 
    data are available for a period where the percent monitor data 
    availability for the CO2 continuous emission monitoring system (or 
    O2 diluent monitor) as of the last unit operating hour of the 
    previous calendar quarter was less than 90.0 percent, the owner or 
    operator shall substitute heat input calculated using the procedures in 
    section 5.5 of appendix F of this part for each hour of the missing 
    data period until quality-assured CO2 or O2 concentration 
    data are again available.
        (d) For a unit that has no diluent monitor certified during the 
    period between the certification deadline in Sec. 75.4(a) for flow 
    monitoring systems and the certification deadline in Sec. 75.4(a) for 
    NOX and CO2 continuous emission monitoring systems, the owner 
    or operator shall calculate heat input using the procedures in section 
    5.5 of appendix F of this part until quality-assured data are available 
    from both a flow monitor and a diluent monitor.
    
    Subpart E--Alternative Monitoring Systems
        33. Section 75.41 is amended by adding a sentence to the end of 
    paragraph (a)(1), revising paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (b)(2)(iv)(A), 
    (b)(2)(iv)(C), (c)(1)(i), (c)(1)(ii) and (c)(2)(ii) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.41  Precision criteria.
    
        (a) * * * [[Page 26531]] 
        (1) * * * For the purposes of this subpart, each reference method 
    run shall be 30 to 60 minutes in duration.
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (i) Apply the log transformation to each measured value of either 
    the certified continuous emissions monitoring system, certified flow 
    monitor or reference method, using the following equation:
    
    lv = ln ev (Eq. 11)
    
    Where:
    
    ev= Hourly value generated by the certified continuous emissions 
    monitoring system, certified flow monitoring system, or reference 
    method.
    * * * * *
        (2) * * *
        (iv) * * *
        (A) The set of measured hourly values, ev, generated by the 
    certified continuous emissions monitoring system, certified flow 
    monitoring system, or reference method.
    * * * * *
        (C) The set of hourly differences, ev - ep, between the 
    hourly values, ev, generated by the certified continuous emissions 
    monitoring system, certified flow monitoring system, or reference 
    method and the hourly values, ep, generated by the proposed 
    alternative monitoring system.
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (i) Calculate the variance of the certified continuous emission 
    monitoring system, certified flow monitor, or reference method as 
    applicable, Sv2, and the proposed method, Sp2, 
    using the following equation.
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.002
    
    
    (Eq. 23)
    Where:
    
    ei = Measured values of either the certified continuous emission 
    monitoring system, certified flow monitor, or reference method, as 
    applicable, or proposed method.
    em = Mean of either the certified continuous emission monitoring 
    system or certified flow monitor, or reference method, as applicable, 
    or proposed method values.
    n = Total number of paired samples.
    
        (ii) Determine if the variance of the proposed method is 
    significantly different from that of the certified continuous emission 
    monitoring system, certified flow monitor, or reference method, as 
    applicable, by calculating the F-value using the following equation.
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.003
    
    
        (Eq. 24)
        Compare the experimental F-value with the critical value of F at 
    the 95-percent confidence level with n-1 degrees of freedom. The 
    critical value is obtained from a table for F-distribution. If the 
    calculated F-value is greater than the critical value, the proposed 
    method is unacceptable.
        (2) * * *
        (ii) Use the following equation to calculate the coefficient of 
    correlation, r, between the emissions data from the alternative 
    monitoring system and the continuous emission monitoring system using 
    all hourly data for which paired values were available from both 
    monitoring systems.
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.004
    
    
    (Eq. 27)
    Where:
    
    ep = Hourly value generated by the alternative monitoring system.
    ev = Hourly value generated by the continuous emission monitoring 
    system.
    n = Total number of hours for which data were generated for the tests.
    * * * * *
        34. Section 75.47 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.47   Criteria for a class of affected units.
    
        (a) The owner or operator of an affected unit that is determined by 
    the Administrator to be representative of a class of affected units may 
    petition the Administrator under Sec. 75.48 for approval of an 
    alternative monitoring system that may be used at any unit in that 
    class based on testing performed only at the representative unit.
        (b) The owner or operator of an affected unit representing a class 
    of affected units shall provide the following information to obtain 
    class status:
        (1) A description of the affected unit at which the demonstration 
    will be performed and how it appropriately represents the class of 
    affected units; and
        (2) A description and listing of the class of affected units, 
    including a listing of all units and data describing all the affected 
    units which will comprise the class; and
        (3) A demonstration that the magnitude of emissions for all units 
    which will comprise the class of affected units are de minimis.
        (c) If the Administrator determines that the emissions from all 
    affected units which will comprise the class of units are de minimis, 
    then the Administrator shall publish notice in the Federal Register of 
    each request for approval of class status and shall provide a 30-day 
    period for public comment, prior to granting approval.
        (d) The designated representative shall provide the information 
    required in Sec. 75.48 based on testing at the representative unit when 
    petitioning for approval of the alternative monitoring system for 
    members of the class. A request for class status under this section may 
    be submitted simultaneously with a petition under Sec. 75.48, or 
    following approval of a petition under Sec. 75.48.
        35. Section 75.48 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) 
    introductory text, and (a)(1), and by adding paragraphs (b) and (c) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.48   Petition for an alternative monitoring system.
        (a) The designated representative shall submit the following 
    information in the petition for approval of an alternative monitoring 
    system for an affected unit, or a class of affected units approved 
    pursuant to Sec. 75.47.
        (1) Source identification information for the affected unit at 
    which testing was performed.
    * * * * *
        (b) The Administrator will publish a notice of receipt of each 
    petition for approval of an alternative monitoring 
    [[Page 26532]] system in the Federal Register and, following a public 
    comment period of 30 days, will issue a notice of approval or 
    disapproval of the alternative monitoring system.
        (c) No alternative monitoring system approved under this section 
    shall be used under the Acid Rain Program prior to successful 
    completion of all certification tests under Sec. 75.20(f).
    
    Subpart F--Recordkeeping Requirements
    
        36. Section 75.50 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.50  General recordkeeping provisions.
    
        (a) Recordkeeping requirements for affected sources. The provisions 
    of this section shall remain in effect prior to January 1, 1996. The 
    owner or operator shall meet the requirements of either Secs. 75.50 or 
    75.54 prior to January 1, 1996. On or after January 1, 1996, the owner 
    or operator shall meet the requirements of Sec. 75.54 only.
    * * * * *
        37. Section 75.51 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.51   General recordkeeping provisions for specific situations.
    
    * * * * *
        (e) The provisions of this section shall remain in effect prior to 
    January 1, 1996. The owner or operator shall meet the requirements of 
    either Secs. 75.51 or 75.55 prior to January 1, 1996. On or after 
    January 1, 1996, the owner or operator shall meet the requirements of 
    Sec. 75.55 only.
        38. Section 75.52 is amended by adding paragraph (b) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.52   Certification, quality assurance and quality control 
    record provisions.
    
        (a) * * *
        (b) The provisions of this section shall remain in effect prior to 
    January 1, 1996. The owner or operator shall meet the requirements of 
    either Secs. 75.52 or 75.56 prior to January 1, 1996. On or after 
    January 1, 1996, the owner or operator shall meet the requirements of 
    Sec. 75.56 only.
        39. Section 75.53 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b), (c) 
    introductory text, (c)(1), (c)(2)(ii), (c)(4) introductory text, 
    (c)(4)(ii), (c)(4)(vi), (c)(5)(ii), (c)(6), (c)(7), (c)(8), (c)(9), 
    (d)(1), and (d)(2) and by adding paragraphs (c)(10), and (d)(3) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.53   Monitoring plan.
    
        (a) General provisions. The owner or operator of an affected unit 
    shall prepare and maintain a monitoring plan. Except as provided in 
    paragraph (d) of this section, a monitoring plan shall contain 
    sufficient information on the continuous emission or opacity monitoring 
    systems or excepted monitoring systems under appendix D or E of this 
    part and the use of data derived from these systems to demonstrate that 
    all unit SO2 emissions, NOX emissions, CO2 emissions, 
    and opacity are monitored and reported.
        (b) Whenever the owner or operator makes a replacement, 
    modification, or change, either in the certified continuous emission 
    monitoring system or continuous opacity monitoring system or excepted 
    monitoring systems under appendix D or E of this part, including a 
    change in the automated data acquisition and handling system or in the 
    flue gas handling system, that requires recertification, then the owner 
    or operator shall update the monitoring plan.
        (c) Contents of the monitoring plan. Each monitoring plan shall 
    contain the following:
        (1) Precertification information, including, as applicable, the 
    identification of the test strategy, protocol for the relative accuracy 
    test audit, other relevant test information, span calculations, and 
    apportionment strategies under Secs. 75.13 through 75.17 of this part.
        (2) * * *
        (ii) Classification of unit as one of the following: Phase I 
    (including substitution or compensating units), Phase II, new, or 
    nonaffected;
    * * * * *
        (4) Monitoring component table. Identification and description of 
    each monitoring component (including each monitor and its identifiable 
    components such as analyzer and/or probe) in the continuous emission 
    monitoring systems (i.e., SO2 pollutant concentration monitor, 
    flow monitor, moisture monitor; NOX pollutant concentration 
    monitor and diluent gas monitor) the continuous opacity monitoring 
    system, or excepted monitoring system (i.e., fuel flowmeter, data 
    acquisition and handling system), including:
    * * * * *
        (ii) Component/system identification code assigned by the utility 
    to each identifiable monitoring component (such as the analyzer and/or 
    probe). The code shall use a six-digit format, unique to each 
    monitoring component, where the first three digits indicate the number 
    of the component and the second three digits indicate the system to 
    which the component belongs;
    * * * * *
        (vi) A designation of the system as a primary, redundant backup, 
    non-redundant backup or reference method backup system, as provided for 
    in Sec. 75.10(e).
        (5) * * *
        (ii) For software components, identification of the provider and a 
    brief description of features;
    * * * * *
        (6) Emissions formula table. A table giving explicit formulas for 
    each reported unit emission parameter, using component/system 
    identification codes to link continuous emission monitoring system or 
    excepted monitoring system observations with reported concentrations, 
    mass emissions, or emission rates, according to the conversions listed 
    in appendix D, E, or F to this part. The formulas must contain all 
    constants and factors required to derive mass emissions or emission 
    rates from component/system code observations, and each emissions 
    formula is identified with a unique three digit code.
        (7) Schematic stack diagrams. For units monitored by a continuous 
    emission or opacity monitoring system, a schematic diagram identifying 
    entire gas handling system from boiler to stack for all affected units, 
    using identification numbers for units, monitor components, and stacks 
    corresponding to the identification numbers provided in paragraphs 
    (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(6) of this section. The schematic 
    diagram must depict stack height and the height of any monitor 
    locations. Comprehensive and/or separate schematic diagrams shall be 
    used to describe groups of units using a common stack.
        (8) Stack and duct engineering diagrams. For units monitored by a 
    continuous emission or opacity monitoring system, stack and duct 
    engineering diagrams showing the dimensions and location of fans, 
    turning vanes, air preheaters, monitor components, probes, reference 
    method sampling ports and other equipment which affects the monitoring 
    system location, performance or quality control checks.
        (9) Inside crosssectional area (ft\2\) at flue exit and at flow 
    monitoring location.
        (10) Span and calibration gas. A table or description identifying 
    maximum potential concentration, maximum expected concentration (if 
    applicable), maximum potential flow rate, maximum potential NOX 
    emission rate, span value, and full-scale range for each SO2, 
    NOX, CO2, O2, or flow component monitor. In addition, 
    the table must identify [[Page 26533]] calibration gas levels for the 
    calibration error test and the linearity check, and calculations made 
    to determine each span value.
        (d) * * *
        (1) For each gas-fired unit or oil-fired unit for which the owner 
    or operator uses the optional protocol in appendix D of this part for 
    estimating SO2 mass emissions or appendix E of this part for 
    estimating NOX emission rate (using a fuel flow meter), the 
    designated representative shall include in the monitoring plan:
        (i) A description of the fuel flowmeter (and data demonstrating its 
    flow meter accuracy, when available);
        (ii) The installation location of each fuel flowmeter;
        (iii) The fuel sampling location(s); and
        (iv) Procedures used for calibrating each fuel flowmeter.
        (2) For each gas-fired peaking unit and oil-fired peaking unit for 
    which the owner or operator uses the optional procedures in appendix E 
    of this part for estimating NOX emission rate, the designated 
    representative shall include in the monitoring plan:
        (i) A protocol containing methods used to perform the baseline or 
    periodic NOX emission test, and a copy of initial performance test 
    results (when such results are available);
        (ii) Unit operating and capacity factor information demonstrating 
    that the unit qualifies as a peaking unit, as defined in Sec. 72.2 of 
    this chapter; and
        (iii) Unit operating parameters related to NOX formation by 
    the unit.
        (3) For each gas-fired unit and diesel-fired unit or unit with a 
    wet flue gas pollution control system for which the designated 
    representative claims an opacity monitoring exemption under Sec. 75.14, 
    the designated representative shall include in the monitoring plan 
    information demonstrating that the unit qualifies for the exemption.
        40. Section 75.54 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.54  General recordkeeping provisions.
    
        (a) Recordkeeping requirements for affected sources. On or after 
    January 1, 1996, the owner or operator shall meet the requirements of 
    this section. The owner or operator of any affected source subject to 
    the requirements of this part shall maintain for each affected unit a 
    file of all measurements, data, reports, and other information required 
    by this part at the source in a form suitable for inspection for at 
    least three (3) years from the date of each record. Unless otherwise 
    provided, throughout this subpart the phrase ``for each affected unit'' 
    also applies to each group of affected or nonaffected units utilizing a 
    common stack and common monitoring systems, pursuant to Secs. 75.13 
    through 75.18, or utilizing a common pipe header and common fuel 
    flowmeter, pursuant to section 2.1.2 of appendix D of this part. The 
    file shall contain the following information:
        (1) The data and information required in paragraphs (b) through (f) 
    of this section, beginning with the earlier of the date of provisional 
    certification, or the deadline in Sec. 75.4(a), (b) or (c);
        (2) The supporting data and information used to calculate values 
    required in paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section, excluding the 
    subhourly data points used to compute hourly averages under 
    Sec. 75.10(d), beginning with the earlier of the date of provisional 
    certification, or the deadline in Sec. 75.4(a), (b) or (c);
        (3) The data and information required in Sec. 75.55 of this part 
    for specific situations, as applicable, beginning with the earlier of 
    the date of provisional certification, or the deadline in Sec. 75.4(a), 
    (b) or (c);
        (4) The certification test data and information required in 
    Sec. 75.56 for tests required under Sec. 75.20, beginning with the date 
    of the first certification test performed, and the quality assurance 
    and quality control data and information required in Sec. 75.56 for 
    tests and the quality assurance/quality control plan required under 
    Sec. 75.21 and appendix B of this part, beginning with the date of 
    provisional certification;
        (5) The current monitoring plan as specified in Sec. 75.53, 
    beginning with the initial submission required by Sec. 75.62; and
        (6) The quality control plan as described in appendix B to this 
    part, beginning with the date of provisional certification.
        (b) Operating parameter record provisions. The owner or operator 
    shall record for each hour the following information on unit operating 
    time, heat input, and load separately for each affected unit, and also 
    for each group of units utilizing a common stack and a common 
    monitoring system or utilizing a common pipe header and common fuel 
    flowmeter, except that separate heat input data for each unit shall not 
    be required after January 1, 2000 for any unit, other than an opt-in 
    source, that does not have a NOX emission limitation under part 76 
    of this chapter.
        (1) Date and hour;
        (2) Unit operating time (rounded up to nearest 15 minutes);
        (3) Total hourly gross unit load (rounded to nearest MWge) (or 
    steam load in lb/hr at stated temperature and pressure, rounded to the 
    nearest 1000 lb/hr, if elected in the monitoring plan);
        (4) Operating load range corresponding to total gross load of 1-10, 
    except for units using a common stack or common pipe header, which may 
    use the number of unit load ranges up to 20 for flow, as specified in 
    the monitoring plan; and
        (5) Total heat input (mmBtu, rounded to the nearest tenth).
        (c) SO2 emission record provisions. The owner or operator 
    shall record for each hour the information required by this paragraph 
    for each affected unit or group of units using a common stack and 
    common monitoring systems, except as provided under Sec. 75.11(e) or 
    for a gas-fired or oil-fired unit for which the owner or operator is 
    using the optional protocol in appendix D to this part for estimating 
    SO2 mass emissions:
        (1) For SO2 concentration, as measured and reported from each 
    certified primary monitor, certified back-up monitor, or other approved 
    method of emissions determination:
        (i) Component-system identification code as provided for in 
    Sec. 75.53;
        (ii) Date and hour;
        (iii) Hourly average SO2 concentration (ppm, rounded to the 
    nearest tenth);
        (iv) Hourly average SO2 concentration (ppm, rounded to the 
    nearest tenth) adjusted for bias, if bias adjustment factor is required 
    as provided for in Sec. 75.24(d);
        (v) Percent monitor data availability (recorded to the nearest 
    tenth of a percent) calculated pursuant to Sec. 75.32; and
        (vi) Method of determination for hourly average SO2 
    concentration using Codes 1-15 in Table 4 of this section.
        (2) For flow as measured and reported from each certified primary 
    monitor, certified back-up monitor or other approved method of 
    emissions determination:
        (i) Component/system identification code as provided for in 
    Sec. 75.53;
        (ii) Date and hour;
        (iii) Hourly average volumetric flow rate (in scfh, rounded to the 
    nearest thousand);
        (iv) Hourly average volumetric flow rate (in scfh, rounded to the 
    nearest thousand) adjusted for bias, if bias adjustment factor required 
    as provided for in Sec. 75.24(d);
        (v) Hourly average moisture content of flue gases (percent, rounded 
    to the nearest tenth) where SO2 concentration is measured on dry 
    basis;
        (vi) Percent monitor data availability (recorded to the nearest 
    tenth of a percent), calculated pursuant to Sec. 75.32; and
        (vii) Method of determination for hourly average flow rate using 
    Codes 1-15 in Table 4. [[Page 26534]] 
        (3) For SO2 mass emissions as measured and reported from the 
    certified primary monitoring system(s), certified redundant or non-
    redundant back-up monitoring system(s), or other approved method(s) of 
    emissions determination:
        (i) Date and hour;
        (ii) Hourly SO2 mass emissions (lb/hr, rounded to the nearest 
    tenth);
        (iii) Hourly SO2 mass emissions (lb/hr, rounded to the nearest 
    tenth) adjusted for bias, if bias adjustment factor required, as 
    provided for in Sec. 75.24(d); and
        (iv) Identification code for emissions formula used to derive 
    hourly SO2 mass emissions from SO2 concentration and flow 
    data in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section as provided for in 
    Sec. 75.53.
    
         Table 4.--Codes for Method of Emissions and Flow Determination     
                                    [Amended]                               
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Code        Hourly emissions/flow measurement or estimation method   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     1........  Certified primary emission/flow monitoring system.          
     2........  Certified back-up emission/flow monitoring system.          
     3........  Approved alternative monitoring system.                     
     4........  Reference method:                                           
                    SO2: Method 6C.                                         
                    Flow: Method 2.                                         
                    NOX: Method 7E.                                         
                    CO2 or O2: Method 3A.                                   
     5........  For units with add-on SO2 and/or NOX emission controls: SO2 
                 concentration or NOX emission rate estimate from Agency    
                 preapproved parametric monitoring method.                  
     6........  Average of the hourly SO2 concentrations, CO2               
                 concentrations, flow, or NOX emission rate for the hour    
                 before and the hour following a missing data period.       
     7........  Hourly average SO2 concentration, CO2 concentration, flow   
                 rate, or NOX emission rate using initial missing data      
                 procedures.                                                
     8........  90th percentile hourly SO2 concentration, flow rate, or NOX 
                 emission rate.                                             
     9........  95th percentile hourly SO2 concentration, flow rate, or NOX 
                 emission rate.                                             
    10........  Maximum hourly SO2 concentration, flow rate, or NOX emission
                 rate.                                                      
    11........  Hourly average flow rate or NOX emission rate in            
                 corresponding load range.                                  
    12........  Maximum potential concentration of SO2, maximum potential   
                 flow rate, or maximum potential NOX emission rate, as      
                 determined using section 2.1 of appendix A of this part, or
                 maximum CO2 concentration.                                 
    13........  Other data (specify method).                                
    14........  Minimum CO2 concentration of 5.0 percent CO2 or maximum O2  
                 concentration of 14.0 percent to be substituted optionally 
                 for measured diluent gas concentrations during unit        
                 startup, for NOX emission rate or SO2 emission rate in lb/ 
                 mmBtu or for CO2 concentration.                            
    15........  Fuel analysis data from appendix G of this part for CO2 mass
                 emissions.                                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (d) NOX emission record provisions. The owner or operator 
    shall record the information required by this paragraph for each 
    affected unit for each hour, except for a gas-fired peaking unit or 
    oil-fired peaking unit for which the owner or operator is using the 
    optional protocol in appendix E to this part for estimating NOX 
    emission rate. For each NOX emission rate as measured and reported 
    from the certified primary monitor, certified back-up monitor, or other 
    approved method of emissions determination:
        (1) Component/system identification code as provided for in 
    Sec. 75.53;
        (2) Date and hour;
        (3) Hourly average NOX concentration (ppm, rounded to the 
    nearest tenth);
        (4) Hourly average diluent gas concentration (percent O2 or 
    percent CO2, rounded to the nearest tenth);
        (5) Hourly average NOX emission rate (lb/mmBtu, rounded to 
    nearest hundredth);
        (6) Hourly average NOX emission rate (lb/mmBtu, rounded to 
    nearest hundredth) adjusted for bias, if bias adjustment factor is 
    required as provided for in Sec. 75.24(d);
        (7) Percent monitoring system data availability, (recorded to the 
    nearest tenth of a percent), calculated pursuant to Sec. 75.32;
        (8) Method of determination for hourly average NOX emission 
    rate using Codes 1-15 in Table 4; and
        (9) Identification code for emissions formula used to derive hourly 
    average NOX emission rate, as provided for in Sec. 75.53.
        (e) CO2 emission record provisions. The owner or operator 
    shall record or calculate CO2 emissions for each affected unit 
    using one of the following methods specified in this section:
        (1) If the owner or operator chooses to use a CO2 continuous 
    emission monitoring system (including an O2 monitor and flow 
    monitor as specified in appendix F of this part), then the owner or 
    operator shall record for each hour the following information for 
    CO2 mass emissions, as measured and reported from the certified 
    primary monitor, certified back-up monitor, or other approved method of 
    emissions determination:
        (i) Component/system identification code as provided for in 
    Sec. 75.53;
        (ii) Date and hour;
        (iii) Hourly average CO2 concentration (in percent, rounded to 
    the nearest tenth);
        (iv) Hourly average volumetric flow rate (scfh, rounded to the 
    nearest thousand scfh);
        (v) Hourly CO2 mass emissions (tons/hr, rounded to the nearest 
    tenth);
        (vi) Percent monitor data availability (recorded to the nearest 
    tenth of a percent); calculated pursuant to Sec. 75.32;
        (vii) Method of determination for hourly CO2 mass emissions 
    using Codes 1-15 in Table 4; and
        (viii) Identification code for emissions formula used to derive 
    average hourly CO2 mass emissions, as provided for in Sec. 75.53.
        (2) As an alternative to Sec. 75.54(e)(1), the owner or operator 
    may use the procedures in Sec. 75.13 and in appendix G to this part, 
    and shall record daily the following information for CO2 mass 
    emissions:
        (i) Date;
        (ii) Daily combustion-formed CO2 mass emissions (tons/day, 
    rounded to the nearest tenth);
        (iii) For coal-fired units, flag indicating whether optional 
    procedure to adjust combustion-formed CO2 mass emissions for 
    carbon retained in flyash has been used and, if so, the adjustment;
        (iv) For a unit with a wet flue gas desulfurization system or other 
    controls generating CO2, daily sorbent-related CO2 mass 
    emissions (tons/day, rounded to the nearest tenth); and
        (v) For a unit with a wet flue gas desulfurization system or other 
    controls generating CO2, total daily CO2 mass emissions 
    (tons/day, rounded to the nearest tenth) as sum of combustion-formed 
    emissions and sorbent-related emissions.
        (f) Opacity records. The owner or operator shall record opacity 
    data as specified by the State or local air pollution control agency. 
    If the State or local air pollution control agency does not specify 
    recordkeeping requirements for opacity, then record the information 
    required by paragraphs (f) (1) through (5) of this section for each 
    affected unit, except as provided for in Sec. 75.14 (b), (c), and (d). 
    The owner or operator shall [[Page 26535]] also keep records of all 
    incidents of opacity monitor downtime during unit operation, including 
    reason(s) for the monitor outage(s) and any corrective action(s) taken 
    for opacity, as measured and reported by the continuous opacity 
    monitoring system:
        (1) Component/system identification code;
        (2) Date, hour, and minute;
        (3) Average opacity of emissions for each six minute averaging 
    period (in percent opacity);
        (4) If the average opacity of emissions exceeds the applicable 
    standard, then a code indicating such an exceedance has occurred; and
        (5) Percent monitor data availability, recorded to the nearest 
    tenth of a percent, calculated according to the requirements of the 
    procedure recommended for State Implementation Plans in appendix M of 
    part 51 of this chapter.
        41. Section 75.55 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.55  General recordkeeping provisions for specific situations.
    
        (a) Specific SO2 emission record provisions for units with 
    qualifying Phase I technology. In addition to the SO2 emissions 
    information required in Sec. 75.54(c), from January 1, 1997, through 
    December 31, 1999, the owner or operator shall record the applicable 
    information in this paragraph for each affected unit on which SO2 
    emission controls have been installed and operated for the purpose of 
    meeting qualifying Phase I technology requirements pursuant to 
    Sec. 72.42 of this chapter and Sec. 75.15.
        (1) For units with post-combustion emission controls:
        (i) Component/system identification codes for each inlet and outlet 
    SO2-diluent continuous emission monitoring system;
        (ii) Date and hour;
        (iii) Hourly average inlet SO2 emission rate (lb/mmBtu, 
    rounded to nearest hundredth);
        (iv) Hourly average outlet SO2 emission rate (lb/mmBtu, 
    rounded to nearest hundredth);
        (v) Percent data availability for both inlet and outlet SO2-
    diluent continuous emission monitoring systems (recorded to the nearest 
    tenth of a percent), calculated pursuant to Equation 8 of Sec. 75.32 
    (for the first 8,760 unit operating hours following initial 
    certification) and Equation 9 of Sec. 75.32, thereafter; and
        (vi) Identification code for emissions formula used to derive 
    hourly average inlet and outlet SO2 mass emissions rates for each 
    affected unit or group of units using a common stack.
        (2) For units with combustion and/or pre-combustion emission 
    controls:
        (i) Component/system identification codes for each outlet SO2-
    diluent continuous emission monitoring system;
        (ii) Date and hour;
        (iii) Hourly average outlet SO2 emission rate (lb/mmBtu, 
    rounded to nearest hundredth);
        (iv) For units with combustion controls, average daily inlet 
    SO2 emission rate (lb/mmBtu, rounded to nearest hundredth), 
    determined by coal sampling and analysis procedures in Sec. 75.15; and
        (v) For units with pre-combustion controls (i.e., fuel 
    pretreatment), fuel analysis demonstrating the weight, sulfur content, 
    and gross calorific value of the product and raw fuel lots.
        (b) [Reserved]
        (c) Specific SO2 emission record provisions for gas-fired or 
    oil-fired units using optional protocol in appendix D of this part. In 
    lieu of recording the information in Sec. 75.54(c) of this section, the 
    owner or operator shall record the applicable information in this 
    paragraph for each affected gas-fired or oil-fired unit for which the 
    owner or operator is using the optional protocol in appendix D of this 
    part for estimating SO2 mass emissions.
        (1) For each hour when the unit is combusting oil:
        (i) Date and hour;
        (ii) Hourly average flow rate of oil with the units in which oil 
    flow is recorded, (gal/hr, lb/hr, m\3\/hr, or bbl/hr, rounded to the 
    nearest tenth)(flag value if derived from missing data procedures);
        (iii) Sulfur content of oil sample used to determine SO2 mass 
    emissions, rounded to nearest hundredth for diesel fuel or to the 
    nearest tenth of a percent for other fuel oil (flag value if derived 
    from missing data procedures);
        (iv) Method of oil sampling (flow proportional, continuous drip, as 
    delivered or manual);
        (v) Mass of oil combusted each hour (lb/hr, rounded to the nearest 
    tenth);
        (vi) SO2 mass emissions from oil (lb/hr, rounded to the 
    nearest tenth);
        (vii) For units using volumetric oil flowmeters, density of oil 
    (flag value if derived from missing data procedures);
        (viii) Gross calorific value (heat content) of oil, used to 
    determine heat input (Btu/mass unit) (flag value if derived from 
    missing data procedures);
        (ix) Hourly heat input rate from oil according to procedures in 
    appendix F of this part (mmBtu/hr, to the nearest tenth); and
        (x) Fuel usage time for combustion of oil during the hour, rounded 
    up to the nearest 15 min.
        (2) For gas-fired units or oil-fired units using the optional 
    protocol in appendix D of this part of daily manual oil sampling, when 
    the unit is combusting oil, the highest sulfur content recorded from 
    the most recent 30 daily oil samples rounded to nearest tenth of a 
    percent.
        (3) For each hour when the unit is combusting gaseous fuel,
        (i) Date and hour;
        (ii) Hourly heat input rate from gaseous fuel according to 
    procedures in appendix F to this part (mmBtu/hr, rounded to the nearest 
    tenth);
        (iii) Sulfur content or SO2 emission rate, in one of the 
    following formats, in accordance with the appropriate procedure from 
    appendix D of this part:
        (A) Sulfur content of gas sample, (rounded to the nearest 0.1 
    grains/100 scf) (flag value if derived from missing data procedures); 
    or
        (B) SO2 emission rate of 0.0006 lb/mmBtu for pipeline natural 
    gas;
        (iv) Hourly flow rate of gaseous fuel, in 100 scfh (flag value if 
    derived from missing data procedures);
        (v) Gross calorific value (heat content) of gaseous fuel, used to 
    determine heat input (Btu/scf) (flag value if derived from missing data 
    procedures);
        (vi) Heat input rate from gaseous fuel (mmBtu/hr, rounded to the 
    nearest tenth);
        (vii) SO2 mass emissions due to the combustion of gaseous 
    fuels, lb/hr; and
        (viii) Fuel usage time for combustion of gaseous fuel during the 
    hour, rounded up to the nearest 15 min.
        (4) For each oil sample or sample of diesel fuel:
        (i) Date of sampling;
        (ii) Sulfur content (percent, rounded to the nearest hundredth for 
    diesel fuel and to the nearest tenth for other fuel oil) (flag value if 
    derived from missing data procedures);
        (iii) Gross calorific value or heat content (Btu/lb) (flag value if 
    derived from missing data procedures); and
        (iv) Density or specific gravity, if required to convert volume to 
    mass (flag value if derived from missing data procedures).
        (5) For each daily sample of gaseous fuel:
        (i) Date of sampling;
        (ii) Sulfur content (grains/100 scf, rounded to the nearest tenth) 
    (flag value if derived from missing data procedures);
        (6) For each monthly sample of gaseous fuel:
        (i) Date of sampling;
        (ii) Gross calorific value or heat content (Btu/scf) (flag value if 
    derived from missing data procedures).
        (d) Specific NOX emission record provisions for gas-fired 
    peaking units or [[Page 26536]] oil-fired peaking units using optional 
    protocol in appendix E of this part. In lieu of recording the 
    information in paragraph Sec. 75.54(d), the owner or operator shall 
    record the applicable information in this paragraph for each affected 
    gas-fired peaking unit or oil-fired peaking unit for which the owner or 
    operator is using the optional protocol in appendix E of this part for 
    estimating NOX emission rate.
        (1) For each hour when the unit is combusting oil,
        (i) Date and hour;
        (ii) Hourly average fuel flow rate of oil with the units in which 
    oil flow is recorded (gal/hour, lb/hr or bbl/hour) (flag value if 
    derived from missing data procedures);
        (iii) Gross calorific value (heat content) of oil, used to 
    determine heat input (Btu/lb) (flag value if derived from missing data 
    procedures);
        (iv) Hourly average NOX emission rate from combustion of oil 
    (lb/mmBtu);
        (v) Heat input rate of oil (mmBtu/hr, rounded to the nearest 
    tenth); and
        (vi) Fuel usage time for combustion of oil during the hour, rounded 
    to the nearest 15 min.
        (2) For each hour when the unit is combusting gaseous fuel,
        (i) Date and hour;
        (ii) Hourly average fuel flow rate of gaseous fuel (100 scfh) (flag 
    value if derived from missing data procedures);
        (iii) Gross calorific value (heat content) of gaseous fuel, used to 
    determine heat input (Btu/scf) (flag value if derived from missing data 
    procedures);
        (iv) Hourly average NOX emission rate from combustion of 
    gaseous fuel (lb/mmBtu, rounded to nearest hundredth);
        (v) Heat input rate from gaseous fuel (mmBtu/hr, rounded to the 
    nearest tenth); and
        (vi) Fuel usage time for combustion of gaseous fuel during the 
    hour, rounded to the nearest 15 min.
        (3) For each hour when the unit combusts any fuel:
        (i) Date and hour;
        (ii) Total heat input from all fuels (mmBtu, rounded to the nearest 
    tenth);
        (iii) Hourly average NOX emission rate for the unit for all 
    fuels;
        (iv) For stationary gas turbines and diesel or dual-fuel 
    reciprocating engines, hourly averages of operating parameters under 
    section 2.3 of appendix E (flag if value is outside of manufacturer's 
    recommended range);
        (v) For boilers, hourly average boiler O2 reading (percent, 
    rounded to the nearest tenth) (flag if value exceeds by more than 2 
    percentage points the O2 level recorded at the same heat input 
    during the previous NOX emission rate test).
        (4) For each fuel sample:
        (i) Date of sampling;
        (ii) Gross calorific value (heat content) (Btu/lb for oil, Btu/scf 
    for gaseous fuel); and
        (iii) Density or specific gravity, if required to convert volume to 
    mass.
        (e) [Reserved]
        (f) The owner or operator shall meet the requirements of this 
    section on or after January 1, 1996.
        42. Section 75.56 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.56  Certification, quality assurance and quality control record 
    provisions.
    
        (a) Continuous emission or opacity monitoring systems. The owner or 
    operator shall record the applicable information in this section for 
    each certified monitor or certified monitoring system (including 
    certified backup monitors) measuring and recording emissions or flow 
    from an affected unit.
        (1) For each SO2 or NOX pollutant concentration monitor, 
    flow monitor, CO2 monitor, or diluent gas monitor, the owner or 
    operator shall record the following for all daily and 7-day calibration 
    error tests, including any follow-up tests after corrective action:
        (i) Component/system identification code;
        (ii) Instrument span;
        (iii) Date and hour;
        (iv) Reference value, (i.e., calibration gas concentration or 
    reference signal value, in ppm or other appropriate units);
        (v) Observed value (monitor response during calibration, in ppm or 
    other appropriate units);
        (vi) Percent calibration error (rounded to nearest tenth of a 
    percent); and
        (vii) For 7-day calibration tests for certification or 
    recertification, a certification from the cylinder gas vendor or CEMS 
    vendor, that calibration gas as defined in Sec. 72.2 and appendix A of 
    this part, were used to conduct calibration error testing; and
        (viii) Description of any adjustments, corrective actions, or 
    maintenance following test.
        (2) For each flow monitor, the owner or operator shall record the 
    following for all daily interference checks, including any follow-up 
    tests after corrective action:
        (i) Code indicating whether monitor passes or fails the 
    interference check; and
        (ii) Description of any adjustments, corrective actions, or 
    maintenance following test.
        (3) For each SO2 or NOX pollutant concentration monitor, 
    CO2 monitor, or diluent gas monitor, the owner or operator shall 
    record the following for the initial and all subsequent linearity 
    check(s), including any follow-up tests after corrective action:
        (i) Component/system identification code;
        (ii) Instrument span;
        (iii) Date and hour;
        (iv) Reference value (i.e., reference gas concentration, in ppm or 
    other appropriate units);
        (v) Observed value (average monitor response at each reference gas 
    concentration, in ppm or other appropriate units);
        (vi) Percent error at each of three reference gas concentrations 
    (rounded to nearest tenth of a percent); and
        (vii) Description of any adjustments, corrective action, or 
    maintenance following test.
        (4) For each flow monitor, where applicable, the owner or operator 
    shall record the following for all quarterly leak checks, including any 
    follow-up tests after corrective action:
        (i) Code indicating whether monitor passes or fails the quarterly 
    leak check; and
        (ii) Description of any adjustments, corrective actions, or 
    maintenance following test.
        (5) For each SO2 pollutant concentration monitor, flow 
    monitor, CO2 pollutant concentration monitor; NOX continuous 
    emission monitoring system, SO2-diluent continuous emission 
    monitoring system, and approved alternative monitoring system, the 
    owner or operator shall record the following information for the 
    initial and all subsequent relative accuracy tests and test audits:
        (i) Date and hour;
        (ii) Reference method(s) used;
        (iii) Individual test run data from the relative accuracy test 
    audit for the SO2 concentration monitor, flow monitor, CO2 
    pollutant concentration monitor, NOX continuous emission 
    monitoring system, SO2-diluent continuous emission monitoring 
    system, or approved alternative monitoring systems, including:
        (A) Date, hour, and minute of beginning of test run,
        (B) Date, hour, and minute of end of test run,
        (C) Component/system identification code,
        (D) Run number,
        (E) Run data for monitor;
        (F) Run data for reference method; and
        (G) Flag value (0 or 1) indicating whether run has been used in 
    calculating relative accuracy and bias values.
        (iv) Calculations and tabulated results, as follows: 
    [[Page 26537]] 
        (A) Arithmetic mean of the monitoring system measurement values, 
    reference method values, and of their differences, as specified in 
    Equation A-7 in appendix A to this part.
        (B) Standard deviation, as specified in Equation A-8 in appendix A 
    to this part.
        (C) Confidence coefficient, as specified in Equation A-9 in 
    appendix A to this part.
        (D) Relative accuracy test results, as specified in Equation A-10 
    in appendix A to this part. (For the 3-level flow monitor test only, 
    relative accuracy test results should be recorded at each of three gas 
    velocities. Each of these three gas velocities shall be expressed as a 
    total gross unit load, rounded to the nearest MWe or as steam load, 
    rounded to the nearest thousand lb/hr.)
        (E) Bias test results as specified in section 7.6.4 in appendix A 
    to this part.
        (F) Bias adjustment factor from Equations A-11 and A-12 in appendix 
    A to this part for any monitoring system or component that failed the 
    bias test and 1.0 for any monitoring system or component that passed 
    the bias test. (For flow monitors only, bias adjustment factors should 
    be recorded at each of three gas velocities).
        (v) Description of any adjustment, corrective action, or 
    maintenance following test.
        (vi) F-factor value(s) used to convert NOX pollutant 
    concentration and diluent gas (O2 or CO2) concentration 
    measurements into NOX emission rates (in lb/mmBtu), heat input or 
    CO2 emissions.
        (6) [Reserved]
        (7) Results of all trial runs and certification tests and quality 
    assurance activities and measurements (including all reference method 
    field test sheets, charts, records of combined system responses, 
    laboratory analyses, and example calculations) necessary to 
    substantiate compliance with all relevant appendices in this part. This 
    information shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following 
    reference method data:
        (i) For each run of each test using Method 2 in appendix A of part 
    60 of this chapter to determine volumetric flow rate:
        (A) Pitot tube coefficient;
        (B) Date of pitot tube calibration;
        (C) Average square root of velocity head of stack gas (inches of 
    water) for the run;
        (D) Average absolute stack gas temperature,  deg.R;
        (E) Barometric pressure at test port, inches of mercury;
        (F) Stack static pressure, inches of H2O;
        (G) Absolute stack gas pressure, inches of mercury;
        (H) Moisture content of stack gas, percent;
        (I) Molecular weight of stack gas, wet basis (lb/lb-mole);
        (J) Number of reference method measurements during the run; and
        (K) Total volumetric flowrate (scfh, wet basis).
        (ii) For each test using Method 2 in appendix A of part 60 of this 
    chapter to determine volumetric flow rate:
        (A) Information indicating whether or not the location meets 
    requirements of Method 1 in appendix A of part 60 of this chapter;
        (B) Information indicating whether or not the equipment passed the 
    leak check after every run included in the relative accuracy test;
        (C) Stack inside diameter at test port (ft);
        (D) Duct side height and width at test port (ft);
        (E) Stack or duct cross-sectional area at test port (ft2); and
        (F) Designation as to the load level of the test.
        (iii) For each run of each test using Method 6C, 7E, or 3A in 
    appendix A of part 60 of this chapter to determine SO2, NOX, 
    CO2, or O2 concentration:
        (A) Run start date;
        (B) Run start time;
        (C) Run end date;
        (D) Run end time;
        (E) Span of reference method analyzer;
        (F) Reference gas concentration (low, mid-, and high gas levels);
        (G) Initial and final analyzer calibration response (low, mid- and 
    high gas levels);
        (H) Analyzer calibration error (low, mid-, and high gas levels);
        (I) Pre-test and post-test analyzer bias (zero and upscale gas 
    levels);
        (J) Calibration drift and zero drift of analyzer;
        (K) Indication as to which data are from a pretest and which are 
    from a posttest;
        (L) Calibration gas level (zero, mid-level, or high); and
        (M) Moisture content of stack gas, in percent, if needed to convert 
    to moisture basis of CEMS being tested.
        (iv) For each test using Method 6C, 7E, or 3A in appendix A of part 
    60 of this chapter to determine SO2, NOX CO2, or O2 
    concentration:
        (A) Pollutant being measured;
        (B) Test number;
        (C) Date of interference test;
        (D) Results of interference test;
        (E) Date of NO2 to NO conversion test (Method 7E only);
        (F) Results of NO2 to NO conversion test (Method 7E only).
        (v) For each calibration gas cylinder used to test using Method 6C, 
    7E, or 3A in appendix A of part 60 of this chapter to determine 
    SO2, NOX, CO2, or O2 concentration:
        (A) Cylinder gas vendor name from certification;
        (B) Cylinder number;
        (C) Cylinder expiration date;
        (D) Pollutant(s) in cylinder; and
        (E) Cylinder gas concentration(s).
        (b) Excepted monitoring systems for gas-fired and oil-fired units. 
    The owner or operator shall record the applicable information in this 
    section for each excepted monitoring system following the requirements 
    of appendix D of this part or appendix E of this part for determining 
    and recording emissions from an affected unit.
        (1) For each oil-fired unit or gas-fired unit using the optional 
    procedures of appendix D of this part for determining SO2 mass 
    emissions and heat input or the optional procedures of appendix E of 
    this part for determining NOX emission rate, for certification and 
    quality assurance testing of fuel flowmeters:
        (i) Date of test,
        (ii) Upper range value of the fuel flowmeter,
        (iii) Flowmeter measurements during accuracy test,
        (iv) Reference flow rates during accuracy test,
        (v) Average flowmeter accuracy as a percent of upper range value,
        (vi) Fuel flow rate level (low, mid-level, or high); and
        (vi) Description of fuel flowmeter calibration specification or 
    procedure (in the certification application, or periodically if a 
    different method is used for annual quality assurance testing).
        (2) For gas-fired peaking units or oil-fired peaking units using 
    the optional procedures of appendix E of this part, for each initial 
    performance, periodic, or quality assurance/quality control-related 
    test:
        (i) For each run of emissions data;
        (A) Run start date and time;
        (B) Run end date and time;
        (C) Fuel flow (lb/hr, gal/hr, scf/hr, bbl/hr, or m3/hr);
        (D) Gross calorific value (heat content) of fuel (Btu/lb or Btu/
    scf);
        (E) Density of fuel (if needed to convert mass to volume);
        (F) Total heat input during the run (mmBtu);
        (G) Hourly heat input rate for run (mmBtu/hr);
        (H) Response time of the O2 and NOX reference method 
    analyzers;
        (I) NOX concentration (ppm);
        (J) O2 concentration (percent O2); [[Page 26538]] 
        (K) NOX emission rate (lb/mmBtu); and
        (L) Fuel or fuel combination (by heat input fraction) combusted.
        (ii) For each unit load and heat input;
        (A) Average NOX emission rate (lb/mmBtu);
        (B) F-factor used in calculations;
        (C) Average heat input rate (mmBtu/hr);
        (D) Unit operating parametric data related to NOX formation 
    for that unit type (e.g., excess O2 level, water/fuel ratio); and
        (E) Fuel or fuel combination (by heat input fraction) combusted.
        (iii) For each test report;
        (A) Graph of NOX emission rate against heat input rate;
        (B) Results of the tests for verification of the accuracy of 
    emissions calculations and missing data procedures performed by the 
    automated data acquisition and handling system, and the calculations 
    used to produce NOX emission rate data at different heat input 
    conditions; and
        (C) Results of all certification tests and quality assurance 
    activities and measurements (including reference method field test 
    sheets, charts, laboratory analyses, example calculations, or other 
    data as appropriate), necessary to substantiate compliance with the 
    requirements of appendix E of this part.
        (c) The owner or operator shall meet the requirements of this 
    section on or after January 1, 1996.
    
    Subpart G--Reporting Requirements
    
        43. Section 75.60 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(1) and 
    (b)(2), and by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.60  General provisions.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (1) All initial certification or recertification testing 
    notifications, initial certification or recertification applications, 
    monitoring plans, petitions for alternative monitoring systems, 
    notifications, electronic quarterly reports, and other communications 
    required by this subpart shall be submitted to the Administrator.
        (2) Copies of initial certification or recertification testing 
    notifications, certification or recertification applications and 
    monitoring plans shall be submitted to the appropriate Regional office 
    of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and appropriate State or 
    local air pollution control agency.
        (c) Confidentiality of data. The following provisions shall govern 
    the confidentiality of information submitted under this part.
        (1) All emission data reported in quarterly reports under 
    Sec. 75.64 shall remain public information.
        (2) For information submitted under this part other than emission 
    data submitted in quarterly reports, the designated representative must 
    assert a claim of confidentiality at the time of submission for any 
    information he or she wishes to have treated as confidential business 
    information (CBI) under subpart B of part 2 of this chapter. Failure to 
    assert a claim of confidentiality at the time of submission may result 
    in disclosure of the information by EPA without further notice to the 
    designated representative.
        (3) Any claim of confidentiality for information submitted in 
    quarterly reports under Sec. 75.64 must include substantiation of the 
    claim. Failure to provide substantiation may result in disclosure of 
    the information by EPA without further notice.
        (4) As provided under subpart B of part 2 of this chapter, EPA may 
    review information submitted to determine whether it is entitled to 
    confidential treatment even when confidentiality claims are initially 
    received. The EPA will contact the designated representative as part of 
    such a review process.
        44. Section 75.61 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.61  Notifications.
    
        (a) Submission. The designated representative for an affected unit 
    (or owner or operator, as specified) shall submit notice to the 
    Administrator, to the appropriate EPA Regional Office, and to the 
    applicable State air pollution control agency for the following 
    purposes, as required by this part.
        (1) Initial certification and recertification test notifications. 
    The owner or operator or designated representative for an affected unit 
    shall submit written notification of initial certification tests, 
    recertification tests, and revised test dates as specified in 
    Sec. 75.20 for continuous emission monitoring systems, for alternative 
    monitoring systems under subpart E of this part, or for excepted 
    monitoring systems under appendix E of this part, except as provided in 
    paragraph (a)(4) of this section and except for testing only of the 
    data acquisition and handling system.
        (i) Notification of initial certification testing. Initial 
    certification test notifications shall be submitted not later than 45 
    days prior to the first scheduled day of initial certification testing. 
    Testing may be performed on a date other than that already provided in 
    a notice under this subparagraph as long as notice of the new date is 
    provided either in writing or by telephone or other means at least 7 
    days prior to the original scheduled test date or the revised test 
    date, whichever is earlier.
        (ii) Notification of certification retesting and recertification 
    testing. For retesting following a loss of certification under 
    Sec. 75.20(a)(5) or for recertification under Sec. 75.20(b), notice of 
    testing shall be submitted either in writing or by telephone at least 7 
    days prior to the first scheduled day of testing; except that in 
    emergency situations when testing is required following an 
    uncontrollable failure of equipment that results in lost data, notice 
    shall be sufficient if provided within 2 business days following the 
    date when testing is scheduled. Testing may be performed on a date 
    other than that already provided in a notice under this subparagraph as 
    long as notice of the new date is provided by telephone or other means 
    at least 2 business days prior to the original scheduled test date or 
    the revised test date, whichever is earlier.
        (iii) Repeat of testing without notice. Notwithstanding the above 
    notice requirements, the owner or operator may elect to repeat a 
    certification test immediately, without advance notification, whenever 
    the owner or operator has determined during the certification testing 
    that a test was failed or that a second test is necessary in order to 
    attain a reduced relative accuracy test frequency.
        (2) New unit, newly affected unit, new stack, or new flue gas 
    desulfurization system operation notification. The designated 
    representative for an affected unit shall submit written notification: 
    For a new unit or a newly affected unit, of the planned date when a new 
    unit or newly affected unit will commence commercial operation or, for 
    new stack or flue gas desulfurization system, of the planned date when 
    a new stack or flue gas desulfurization system will be completed and 
    emissions will first exit to the atmosphere.
        (i) Notification of the planned date shall be submitted not later 
    than 45 days prior to the date the unit commences commercial operation, 
    or not later than 45 days prior to the date when a new stack or flue 
    gas desulfurization system exhausts emissions to the atmosphere.
        (ii) If the date when the unit commences commercial operation or 
    the date when the new stack or flue gas desulfurization system exhausts 
    emissions to the atmosphere, whichever [[Page 26539]] is applicable, 
    changes from the planned date, a notification of the actual date shall 
    be submitted not later than 7 days following: The date the unit 
    commences commercial operation or, the date when a new stack or flue 
    gas desulfurization system exhausts emissions to the atmosphere.
        (3) Unit shutdown and recommencement of commercial operation. The 
    designated representative for an affected unit that will be shutdown on 
    the relevant compliance date in Sec. 75.4(a) and that is relying on the 
    provisions in Sec. 75.4(d) to postpone certification testing shall 
    submit notification of unit shutdown and recommencement of commercial 
    operation as follows:
        (i) For planned unit shutdowns, written notification of the planned 
    shutdown date and planned date of recommencement of commercial 
    operation shall be submitted 45 calendar days prior to the deadline in 
    Sec. 75.4(a). For unit shutdowns that are not planned 45 days prior to 
    the deadline in Sec. 75.4(a), written notification of the planned 
    shutdown date and planned date of recommencement of commercial 
    operation shall be submitted no later than 7 days after the date the 
    owner or operator is able to schedule the shutdown date and date of 
    recommencement of commercial operation. If the actual shutdown date or 
    the actual date of recommencement of commercial operation differs from 
    the planned date, written notice of the actual date shall be submitted 
    no later than 7 days following the actual date of shutdown or of 
    recommencement of commercial operation, as applicable;
        (ii) For unplanned unit shutdowns, written notification of actual 
    shutdown date and the expected date of recommencement of commercial 
    operation shall be submitted no later than 7 days after the shutdown. 
    If the actual date of recommencement of commercial operation differs 
    from the expected date, written notice of the actual date shall be 
    submitted no later than 7 days following the actual date of 
    recommencement of commercial operation.
        (4) Use of backup fuels for appendix E procedures. The designated 
    representative for an affected oil-fired or gas-fired peaking unit that 
    is using an excepted monitoring system under appendix E of this part 
    and that is relying on the provisions in Sec. 75.4(f) to postpone 
    testing of a fuel shall submit written notification of that fact no 
    later than 45 days prior to the deadline in Sec. 75.4(a). The 
    designated representative shall also submit a notification that such a 
    fuel has been combusted no later than 7 days after the first date of 
    combustion of any fuel for which testing has not been performed under 
    appendix E after the deadline in Sec. 75.4(a). Such notice shall also 
    include notice that testing under Appendix E either was performed 
    during the initial combustion or notice of the date that testing will 
    be performed.
        (5) Periodic relative accuracy test audits. The owner or operator 
    or designated representative of an affected unit shall submit written 
    notice of the date of periodic relative accuracy testing performed 
    under appendix B of this part no later than 21 days prior to the first 
    scheduled day of testing. Testing may be performed on a date other than 
    that already provided in a notice under this subparagraph as long as 
    notice of the new date is provided either in writing or by telephone or 
    other means at least 7 days prior to the original scheduled test date 
    or the revised test date, whichever is earlier. Notwithstanding these 
    notice requirements, the owner or operator may elect to repeat a 
    periodic relative accuracy test immediately, without additional 
    notification whenever the owner or operator has determined that a test 
    was failed, or that a second test is necessary in order to attain a 
    reduced relative accuracy test frequency.
        (6) Notice of combustion of emergency fuel under appendix D or E. 
    The designated representative of an oil-fired unit or gas-fired unit 
    using appendix D or E of this part shall provide notice of the 
    combustion of emergency fuel according to the following:
        (i) For an affected oil-fired or gas-fired unit that is using an 
    excepted monitoring system under appendix D or E of this part, where 
    the owner or operator is postponing installation or testing of a fuel 
    flowmeter for emergency fuel under Sec. 75.4(g), the designated 
    representative shall submit written notification of postponement of 
    installation or testing no later than 45 days prior to the deadline in 
    Sec. 75.4(a). The designated representative shall also submit a 
    notification that emergency fuel has been combusted no later than 7 
    days after the first date of combustion of the emergency fuel after the 
    deadline in Sec. 75.4(a).
        (ii) The designated representative of a unit that has received 
    approval of a petition under Sec. 75.66 for exemption from one or more 
    of the requirements of appendix E of this part for certification of an 
    excepted monitoring system under appendix E of this part for a unit 
    combusting emergency fuel shall submit written notice of each period of 
    combustion of the emergency fuel with the next quarterly report 
    submitted under Sec. 75.64 for each calendar quarter in which emergency 
    fuel is combusted, including notice specifying the exact dates and 
    hours during which the emergency fuel was combusted.
        (b) The owner or operator or designated representative shall submit 
    notification of certification tests and recertification tests for 
    continuous opacity monitoring systems, as specified in Sec. 75.20(c)(6) 
    to the State or local air pollution control agency.
        (c) If the Administrator determines that notification substantially 
    similar to that required in this section is required by any other State 
    or local agency, the owner or operator or designated representative may 
    send the Administrator a copy of that notification to satisfy the 
    requirements of this section, provided the ORISPL unit identification 
    number(s) is denoted.
        45. Section 75.62 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and adding 
    paragraph (c) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.62  Monitoring plan.
    
        (a) Submission. The designated representative for an affected unit 
    shall submit the monitoring plan to the Administrator no later than 45 
    days prior to the first scheduled certification test, other than 
    testing of a fuel flowmeter or an excepted monitoring system under 
    appendix D of this part. The designated representative shall submit the 
    monitoring plan for a Phase II unit using an excepted monitoring system 
    under appendix D of this part to the Administrator no later than 
    November 15, 1994.
    * * * * *
        (c) Format. Each monitoring plan shall be submitted in a format 
    specified by the Administrator, including information in electronic 
    format and on paper.
        46. Section 75.63 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.63  Initial certification or recertification application.
    
        (a) Submission. The designated representative for an affected unit 
    or a combustion source seeking to enter the Opt-in Program in 
    accordance with part 74 of this chapter shall submit the application to 
    the Administrator within 45 days after completing all initial 
    certification tests or recertification tests.
        (b) Contents. Each application for initial certification or 
    recertification shall contain the following information:
        (1) A copy of the monitoring plan (or any modifications to the 
    monitoring plan) for the unit, or units, or combustion sources seeking 
    to enter the Opt-in Program in accordance with part [[Page 26540]] 74 
    of this chapter, if not previously submitted.
        (2) The results of the test(s) required by Sec. 75.20, including 
    the type of test conducted, testing date, and field data sheets 
    required by Sec. 75.52 (or Sec. 75.56, no later than January 1, 1996), 
    and including the results of any failed tests that had been repeated 
    pursuant to the requirements in Sec. 75.20.
        (3) Results of the tests for verification of the accuracy of 
    emissions and volumetric flow calculations performed by the automated 
    data acquisition and handling system, including a summary of equations 
    used to convert component data to units of the standard and to 
    calculate substitute data for missing data periods, including sample 
    calculations.
        (c) Format. Each certification application shall be submitted in a 
    format to be specified by the Administrator, including test results in 
    electronic format and field data sheets required by Sec. 75.52 (or 
    Sec. 75.56, no later than January 1, 1996) on paper where the 
    information required under Sec. 75.56(a)(7) shall be submitted on 
    paper.
        47. Section 75.64 is amended by revising the first two sentences of 
    paragraph (a) introductory text, by revising paragraphs (a)(5), (b) and 
    (d), by revising the last sentence of paragraph (e) introductory text 
    and by removing paragraphs (e)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.64  Quarterly reports.
    
        (a) Electronic submission. The designated representative for an 
    affected unit shall electronically report the data and information in 
    paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section to the Administrator 
    quarterly, beginning with the data from the later of: the last 
    (partial) calendar quarter of 1993 (where the calendar quarter data 
    begins at November 15, 1993); or the calendar quarter corresponding to 
    the relevant deadline for certification in Sec. 75.4(a), (b), or (c). 
    For any provisionally-certified monitoring system, some or all of the 
    quarterly data may be invalidated, if the Administrator subsequently 
    issues a notice of disapproval within 120 days of receipt of the 
    complete initial certification application or within 60 days of receipt 
    of the complete recertification application for the monitoring system. 
    * * *
        (5) Total heat input (mmBtu) for quarter and cumulative heat input 
    for calendar year.
    * * * * *
        (b) The designated representative shall affirm that the component/
    system identification codes and formulas in the quarterly electronic 
    reports, submitted to the Administrator pursuant to Sec. 75.53, 
    represent current operating conditions.
    * * * * *
        (d) Electronic format. Each quarterly report shall be submitted in 
    a format to be specified by the Administrator, including both 
    electronic submission of data and paper submission of compliance 
    certifications.
        (e) * * * Each report shall include all measurements and 
    calculations necessary to substantiate that the qualifying technology 
    achieves the overall percentage reduction in SO2 emissions.
        48. Section 75.65 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.65  Opacity reports.
    
        The owner or operator or designated representative shall report 
    excess emissions of opacity recorded under Secs. 75.50(f) or 75.54(f) 
    to the applicable State or local air pollution control agency, in a 
    format specified by the applicable State or local air pollution control 
    agency.
        49. Section 75.66 is amended by redesignating paragraphs (a), (b), 
    (c), (d), (e) and (f) as paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), (f) and (i), by 
    adding new paragraphs (a), (g), and (h), and by revising newly 
    designated paragraphs (b), (c), and (i), to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.66  Petitions to the Administrator.
    
        (a) General. The designated representative for an affected unit 
    subject to the requirements of this part may submit petitions to the 
    Administrator. Any petitions shall be submitted in accordance with the 
    requirements of this section. The designated representative shall 
    comply with the signatory requirements of Sec. 72.21 of this chapter 
    for each submission.
        (b) Alternative flow monitoring method petition. In cases where no 
    location exists for installation of a flow monitor in either the stack 
    or the ducts serving an affected unit that satisfies the minimum 
    physical siting criteria in appendix A of this part or where 
    installation of a flow monitor in either the stack or duct is 
    demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Administrator to be technically 
    infeasible, the designated representative for the affected unit may 
    petition the Administrator for an alternative method for monitoring 
    volumetric flow. The petition shall, at a minimum, contain the 
    following information:
        (1) Identification of the affected unit(s);
        (2) Description of why the minimum siting criteria cannot be met 
    within the existing ductwork or stack(s). This description shall 
    include diagrams of the existing ductwork or stack, as well as 
    documentation of any attempts to locate a flow monitor; and
        (3) Description of proposed alternative method for monitoring flow.
        (c) Alternative to standards incorporated by reference. The 
    designated representative for an affected unit may apply to the 
    Administrator for an alternative to any standard incorporated by 
    reference and prescribed in this part. The designated representative 
    shall include the following information in an application:
        (1) A description of why the prescribed standard is not being used;
        (2) A description and diagram(s) of any equipment and procedures 
    used in the proposed alternative;
        (3) Information demonstrating that the proposed alternative 
    produces data acceptable for use in the Acid Rain Program, including 
    accuracy and precision statements, NIST traceability certificates or 
    protocols, or other supporting data, as applicable to the proposed 
    alternative.
    * * * * *
        (g) Petitions for emissions or heat input apportionments. The 
    designated representative of an affected unit shall provide information 
    to describe a method for emissions or heat input apportionment under 
    Secs. 75.13, 75.16, 75.17, or appendix D of this part. This petition 
    may be submitted as part of the monitoring plan. Such a petition shall 
    contain, at a minimum, the following information:
        (1) A description of the units, including their fuel type, their 
    boiler type, and their categorization as Phase I units, substitution 
    units, compensating units, Phase II units, new units, or non-affected 
    units;
        (2) A formula describing how the emissions or heat input are to be 
    apportioned to which units;
        (3) A description of the methods and parameters used to apportion 
    the emissions or heat input; and
        (4) Any other information necessary to demonstrate that the 
    apportionment method accurately measures emissions or heat input and 
    does not underestimate emissions or heat input from affected units.
        (h) Partial recertification petition. The designated representative 
    of an affected unit may provide information and petition the 
    Administrator to specify which of the certification tests required by 
    Sec. 75.20 apply for partial recertification of the affected unit. Such 
    [[Page 26541]] a petition shall include the following information:
        (1) Identification of the monitoring system(s) being changed;
        (2) A description of the changes being made to the system;
        (3) An explanation of why the changes are being made; and
        (4) A description of the possible effect upon the monitoring 
    system's ability to measure, record, and report emissions.
        (i) Any other petitions to the Administrator under this part. The 
    designated representative for an affected unit shall include sufficient 
    information for the evaluation of any other petition submitted to the 
    Administrator under this part.
        50. Section 75.67 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 75.67  Retired units petitions.
    
        (a) For units that will be permanently retired prior to January 1, 
    1995, if the designated representative submits a complete petition, as 
    required in Sec. 72.8 of this chapter, to the Administrator prior to 
    the deadline in Sec. 75.4 by which the continuous emission or opacity 
    monitoring systems must complete the required certification tests, the 
    Administrator will issue an exemption from the requirements of this 
    part, including the requirement to install and certify continuous 
    emission monitoring systems.
    * * * * *
    
    Appendix A to Part 75--Specifications and Test Procedures
    
        51. Appendix A to part 75, section 1 is amended by revising section 
    1.1.2, by revising the fourth sentence in section 1.2; and by revising 
    section 1.2.1 and by revising the first sentence of section 1.2.2 to 
    read as follows:
    
    1. Installation and Measurement Location
    
    1.1  * * *
    
    1.1.1  * * *
    
    1.1.2  Path Pollutant Concentration and CO2 or O2 Gas 
    Monitors
    
        Locate the measurement path (1) totally within the inner area 
    bounded by a line 1.0 meter from the stack or duct wall, or (2) such 
    that at least 70.0 percent of the path is within the inner 50.0 
    percent of the stack or duct cross-sectional area, or (3) such that 
    the path is centrally located within any part of the centroidal 
    area.
    
    1.2  Flow Monitors
    
        * * * The EPA recommends (but does not require) performing a 
    flow profile study following the procedures in 40 CFR part 60, 
    appendix A, Method, 1, section 2.5 or 2.4 for each of the three 
    operating or load levels indicated in section 6.5.2 of this appendix 
    to determine the acceptability of the potential flow monitor 
    location and to determine the number and location of flow sampling 
    points required to obtain a representative flow value. * * *
    
    1.2.1  Acceptability of Monitor Location
    
        The installation of a flow monitor is acceptable if either (1) 
    the location satisfies the minimum siting criteria of Method 1 in 
    Appendix A to part 60 of this chapter (i.e., the location is greater 
    than or equal to eight stack or duct diameters downstream and two 
    diameters upstream from a flow disturbance; or, if necessary, two 
    stack or duct diameters downstream and one-half stack or duct 
    diameter upstream from a flow disturbance), or (2) the results of a 
    flow profile study, if performed, are acceptable (i.e., there are no 
    cyclonic (or swirling) or stratified flow conditions), and the flow 
    monitor also satisfies the performance specifications of this part. 
    If the flow monitor is installed in a location that does not satisfy 
    these physical criteria, but nevertheless the monitor achieves the 
    performance specifications of this part, then the location is 
    acceptable, notwithstanding the requirements of this section.
    
    1.2.2  Flow Monitor Certification Date Extension
    
        Whenever the designated representative successfully demonstrates 
    that modifications to the exhaust duct or stack (such as 
    installation of straightening vanes, modifications of ductwork, and 
    the like) are necessary for the flow monitor to meet the performance 
    specifications, the Administrator may approve an interim alternative 
    flow monitoring methodology and an extension to the required 
    certification date for the flow monitor. * * *
    * * * * *
        52. Appendix A to part 75, section 2 is amended by revising 
    sections 2.1.1; revising the first paragraph of section 2.1.1.1, and by 
    revising sections 2.1.1.2, 2.1.1.4, 2.1.2, 2.1.2.1, 2.1.2.2, 2.1.2.4, 
    2.1.3 and 2.1.4 to read as follows:
    
    2. Equipment Specifications
    
    2.1  * * *
    
    2.1.1  SO2 Pollutant Concentration Monitors
    
        Determine, as indicated below, the span value for an SO2 
    pollutant concentration monitor so that all expected concentrations 
    can be accurately measured and recorded.
    
    2.1.1.1   Maximum Potential Concentration
        The monitor must be capable of accurately measuring up to 125 
    percent of the maximum potential concentration (MPC) as calculated 
    using Equation A-1a or A-1b. Calculate the maximum potential 
    concentration by using Equation A-1a or A-1b and the maximum percent 
    sulfur and minimum gross calorific value (GCV) for the highest 
    sulfur fuel to be burned, using daily fuel sample data if they are 
    available. If an SO2 CEMS is already installed, the owner or 
    operator may determine an MPC based upon the maximum concentration 
    observed during the previous 30 unit operating days when using the 
    type of fuel to be burned. For initial certification, base the 
    maximum percent sulfur and minimum GCV on the results of all 
    available fuel sampling and analysis data from the previous 12 
    months (where such data exists). If the unit has not been operated 
    during that period, use the maximum sulfur content and minimum GCV 
    from the fuel contract for fuel that will be combusted by the unit. 
    Whenever the fuel supply changes such that these maximum sulfur and 
    minimum GCV values may change significantly, base the maximum 
    percent sulfur and minimum GCV on the new fuel with the highest 
    sulfur content. Use the one of the two following methods that 
    results in a higher MPC: (1) results of samples representative of 
    the new fuel supply, or (2) maximum sulfur and minimum GCV from the 
    fuel contract for fuel that will be combusted by the unit. Whenever 
    performing fuel sampling to determine the MPC, use ASTM Methods ASTM 
    D3177-89, ``Standard Test Methods for Total Sulfur in the Analysis 
    Sample of Coal and Coke,'' ASTM D4239-85, ``Standard Test Methods 
    for Sulfur in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke Using High 
    Temperature Tube Furnace Combustion Methods,'' ASTM D4294-90, 
    ``Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products by Energy-
    Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy,'' ASTM D1552-90, 
    ``Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products (High 
    Temperature Method),'' ASTM D129-91, ``Standard Test Method for 
    Sulfur in Petroleum Products (General Bomb Method),'' or ASTM D2622-
    92, ``Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products by X-Ray 
    Spectrometry'' for sulfur content of solid or liquid fuels, or ASTM 
    D3176-89, ``Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal and 
    Coke'', ASTM D240-87 (Reapproved 1991), ``Standard Test Method for 
    Heat of Combustion of Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb 
    Calorimeter'', or ASTM D2015-91, ``Standard Test Method for Gross 
    Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter'' 
    for GCV (incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6). Multiply the 
    maximum potential concentration by 125 percent, and round up the 
    resultant concentration to the nearest multiple of 100 ppm to 
    determine the span value. The span value will be used to determine 
    the concentrations of the calibration gases. Include the full-scale 
    range setting and calculations of the span and MPC in the monitoring 
    plan for the unit. Select the full-scale range of the instrument to 
    be consistent with section 2.1 of this appendix, and to be greater 
    than or equal to the span value. This selected monitor range with a 
    span rounded up from 125 percent of the maximum potential 
    concentration will be the ``high-scale'' of the SO2 pollutant 
    concentration monitor.
    
    [[Page 26542]]
    
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.005
    
    
    2.1.1.2  Maximum Expected Concentration
    
        If the majority of SO2 concentration values are predicted 
    to be less than 25 percent of the full-scale range of the instrument 
    selected under section 2.1.1.1 of this appendix, (e.g., where an 
    SO2 add-on emission control is used or where fuel with 
    different sulfur contents are blended), use an additional (lower) 
    measurement range. For this second range, use Equation A-2 to 
    calculate the maximum expected concentration (MEC) for units with 
    emission controls. For units blending fuels, calculate the MEC using 
    a best estimate of the highest sulfur content and lowest gross 
    calorific value expected for the blend and inserting these values 
    into Equation A-1. If an SO2 CEMS is already installed, the 
    owner or operator may calculate an MEC based upon the maximum 
    concentration measured by the CEMS over a thirty-day period, 
    provided that there have been no full-scale exceedances since the 
    range was last selected. Multiply the maximum expected concentration 
    by 125 percent, and round up the resultant concentration to the 
    nearest multiple of 10 ppm to determine the span value for the 
    additional (lower) range. The span value of this additional range 
    will also be used to determine concentrations of the calibration 
    gases for this additional range. Report the full-scale range setting 
    and calculations of the MEC and span in the monitoring plan for the 
    unit. Select the full-scale range of the instrument of this 
    additional (lower) range to be consistent with section 2.1 of this 
    appendix, and to be greater than or equal to the lower range span 
    value. This selected monitor range with a span rounded up from 125 
    percent of the MEC will be the ``low-scale'' of the SO2 
    pollutant concentration monitor. Units using a low-scale range must 
    also be capable of accurately measuring the anticipated 
    concentrations up to and including 125 percent of the maximum 
    potential concentration. If an existing State, local, or Federal 
    requirement for span of an SO2 pollutant concentration monitor 
    requires a span other than that required in this section, but less 
    than that required for the high-scale by this appendix, the State, 
    local or Federal span value may be approved, where a satisfactory 
    explanation is included in the monitoring plan.
    
    MEC=MPC[(100-RE)/100]    (Eq. A-2)
    Where:
    
    MEC=Maximum expected concentration (ppm).
    MPC=Maximum potential concentration (ppm), as determined by Eq. A-1a 
    or A-1b.
    RE = Expected average design removal efficiency of control equipment 
    (%).
    2.1.1.3 * * *
    
    2.1.1.4 Adjustment of Span
    
        Wherever the SO2 concentration exceeds the maximum 
    potential concentration but does not exceed the full-scale range 
    during more than one clock-hour and the monitor can measure and 
    record the SO2 concentration accurately, it may be reported for 
    use in the Acid Rain Program. If the concentration exceeds the 
    monitor's ability to measure and record values accurately during a 
    clock hour, and the full-scale exceedance is not during an out-of-
    control period, report the full-scale value as the SO2 
    concentration for that clock hour. If full-scale exceedances occur 
    during more than one clock hour since the last adjustment of the 
    full-scale range setting, adjust the full-scale range setting to 
    prevent future exceedances.
        Whenever the fuel supply or emission controls change such that 
    the maximum expected or potential concentration may change 
    significantly, adjust the span and range setting to assure the 
    continued proper operation of the monitoring system. Determine the 
    adjusted span using the procedures in sections 2.1.1.1 or 2.1.1.2 of 
    this appendix. Select the full scale range of the instrument to be 
    greater than or equal to the new span value and to be consistent 
    with the guidelines of section 2.1 of this appendix. Record and 
    report the new full-scale range setting, calculations of the span, 
    MPC, and MEC (if appropriate), and the adjusted span value, in an 
    updated monitoring plan. In addition, record and report the adjusted 
    span as part of the records for the daily calibration error test and 
    linearity check specified by appendix B of this part. Whenever the 
    span value is adjusted, use calibration gas concentrations based on 
    the most recent adjusted span value. Perform a linearity check 
    according to section 6.2 of this appendix whenever making a change 
    to the monitor span or range. Recertification under Sec. 75.20(b) is 
    required whenever a significant change in the monitor's range also 
    requires an internal modification to the monitor (e.g., a change of 
    measurement cell length).
    
    2.1.2 NOX Pollutant Concentration Monitors
    
        Determine, as indicated below, the span value(s) for the 
    NOX pollutant concentration monitor so that all expected 
    NOX concentrations can be determined and recorded accurately 
    including both the maximum expected and potential concentration.
    
    2.1.2.1 Maximum Potential Concentration
    
        The monitor must be capable of accurately measuring up to 125 
    percent of the maximum potential concentration (MPC) as determined 
    below in this section. Use 800 ppm for coal-fired and 400 ppm for 
    oil- or gas-fired units as the maximum potential concentration of 
    NOx, unless a more representative MPC is determined by one of the 
    following methods (If an MPC of 1600 ppm for coal-fired units or 480 
    ppm for oil- or gas-fired units was previously selected under this 
    part, that value may still be used.): (1) NOX emission test 
    results, (2) historical CEM data over the previous 30 unit operating 
    days; or (3) specific values based on boiler-type and fuel 
    combusted, listed in Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 if other data under (1) 
    or (2) were not available. Multiply the MPC by 125 percent and round 
    up to the nearest multiple of 100 ppm to determine the span value. 
    The span value will be used to determine the concentrations of the 
    calibration gases.
        Report the full-scale range setting, and calculations of the 
    MPC, maximum potential NOX emission rate, and span in the 
    monitoring plan for the unit. Select the full-scale range of the 
    instrument to be consistent with section 2.1 of this appendix, and 
    to be greater than or equal to the span value. This selected monitor 
    range with a span rounded up from 125 percent of the maximum 
    potential concentration will be the ``high-scale'' of the NOX 
    pollutant concentration monitor.
        If NOX emission testing is used to determine the maximum 
    potential NOX concentration, use the following guidelines: Use 
    Method 7E from appendix A of part 60 of this chapter to measure 
    total NOX concentration. Operate the unit, or group of units 
    sharing a common stack, at the minimum safe and stable load, the 
    normal load, and the maximum load. If the normal load and maximum 
    load are identical, an intermediate level need not be tested. 
    Operate at the highest excess O2 level expected under normal 
    operating conditions. Make at least three runs with three traverse 
    points of at least 20 minutes duration at each operating condition. 
    Select the highest NOX concentration from all measured values 
    as the maximum potential concentration for NOx. If historical CEM 
    data are used to determine the MPC, the data must represent various 
    operating conditions, including the minimum safe and stable load, 
    normal load, and maximum load. Calculate the MPC and span using the 
    highest hourly NOX concentration in ppm. If no test data or 
    historical CEM data are available, use Table 2-1 or Table 2-2 to 
    estimate the maximum potential concentration based upon boiler type 
    and fuel used.
    
                                                                            
    [[Page 26543]]
      Table 2-1.--Maximum Potential Concentration for NOX--Coal-Fired Units 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Unit type          Maximum potential concentration for NOX (ppm)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tangentially-fired dry     460                                          
     bottom and fluidized bed.                                              
    Wall-fired dry bottom,     675                                          
     turbo-fired dry bottom,                                                
     stokers.                                                               
    Roof-fired (vertically-    975                                          
     fired) dry bottom, cell                                                
     burners, arch-fired.                                                   
    Cyclone, wall-fired wet    1200                                         
     bottom, wet bottom turbo-                                              
     fired.                                                                 
    Others...................  As approved by the Administrator.            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
     Table 2-2.--Maximum Potential Concentration For NOX--Gas- And Oil-Fired
                                      Units                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Unit type          Maximum potential concentration for NOX (ppm)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Tangentially-fired dry     380                                          
     bottom.                                                                
    Wall-fired dry bottom....  600                                          
    Roof-fired (vertically-    550                                          
     fired) dry bottom, arch-                                               
     fired.                                                                 
    Existing combustion        200                                          
     turbine or combined                                                    
     cycle turbine.                                                         
    New stationary gas         50                                           
     turbine/combustion                                                     
     turbine.                                                               
    Others...................  As approved by the Administrator.            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2.1.2.2 Maximum Expected Concentration
    
        If the majority of NOX concentrations are expected to be 
    less than 25 percent of the full-scale range of the instrument 
    selected under section 2.1.2.1 of this appendix (e.g., where a 
    NOX add-on emission control is used) use a ``low-scale'' 
    measurement range. For units with add-on emission controls, 
    determine the maximum expected concentration (MEC) of NOX using 
    Equation A-2, inserting the maximum potential concentration, as 
    determined using the procedures in section 2.1.2.1 of this appendix. 
    Where Equation A-2 is not appropriate, set the MEC, either (1) by 
    measuring the NOX concentration using the testing procedures in 
    section 2.1.2.1 of this appendix, or (2) by using historical CEM 
    data over the previous 30 unit operating days. Other methods for 
    determining the MEC may be accepted if they are satisfactorily 
    explained in the monitoring plan. If an existing State, local, or 
    Federal requirement for span of an NOX pollutant concentration 
    monitor requires a span other than that required in this section, 
    but less than that required for the high scale by this appendix, the 
    State, local, or Federal span value may be approved, where a 
    satisfactory explanation is included in the monitoring plan. 
    Calculate the span for the additional (lower) range by multiplying 
    the maximum expected concentration by 125 percent and by rounding up 
    the resultant concentration to the nearest multiple of 10 ppm. The 
    span value of this additional (lower) range will also be used to 
    determine the concentrations of the calibration gases. Include the 
    full-scale range setting and calculations of the MEC and span in the 
    monitoring plan for the unit. Select the full-scale range of the 
    instrument to be consistent with section 2.1 of this appendix, and 
    to be greater or equal to the lower range span value. This selected 
    monitor range with a span rounded up from 125 percent of the maximum 
    expected concentration is the ``low-scale'' of NOX pollutant 
    concentration monitors. NOX pollutant concentration monitors on 
    affected units with NOX emission controls, or on other units 
    with monitors using a low-scale range, must also be capable of 
    accurately measuring up to 125 percent of the maximum potential 
    concentration. For dual-span NOX pollutant concentration 
    monitors, determine the concentration of calibration gases based on 
    both span values.
    
    2.1.2.3 * * *
    
    2.1.2.4 Adjustment of Span
    
        Wherever the actual NOX concentration exceeds the maximum 
    potential concentration but does not exceed the full-scale range for 
    more than one clock-hour and the monitor can measure and record the 
    NOX concentration values accurately, the NOX concentration 
    values may be reported for use in the Acid Rain Program. If the 
    concentration exceeds the monitor's ability to measure and record 
    values accurately during a clock hour, and the full-scale exceedance 
    is not during an out-of-control period, report the full-scale value 
    as the NOX concentration for that clock hour. If full-scale 
    exceedances occur during more than one clock hour since the last 
    adjustment of the full-scale range setting, adjust the full-scale 
    range setting to prevent future exceedances.
        Whenever the fuel supply, emission controls, or other process 
    parameters change such that the maximum expected concentration or 
    the maximum potential concentration may change significantly, adjust 
    the NOX pollutant concentration span and monitor range to 
    assure the continued accuracy of the monitoring system. Determine 
    the adjusted span value using the procedures in sections 2.1.2.1 or 
    2.1.2.2 of this appendix. Select the new full scale range of the 
    instrument to be greater than or equal to the adjusted span value 
    and to be consistent with the guidelines of section 2.1 of this 
    appendix. Record and report the new full-scale range setting, 
    calculations of the span value, MPC, and MEC (if appropriate), 
    maximum potential NOX emission rate and the adjusted span value 
    in an updated monitoring plan for the unit. In addition, record and 
    report the adjusted span as part of the records for the daily 
    calibration error test and linearity check required by appendix B of 
    this part. Whenever the span value is adjusted, use calibration gas 
    concentrations based on the most recent adjusted span value. Perform 
    a linearity check according to section 6.2 of this appendix whenever 
    making a change to the monitor span or range. Recertification under 
    Sec. 75.20(b) is required whenever a significant change is made in 
    the monitor's range that requires an internal modification to the 
    monitor (e.g., a change of measurement cell length).
    
    2.1.3 CO2 and O2 Monitors
    
        Define the ``high scale'' span value as 20 percent O2 or 20 
    percent CO2. All O2 and CO2 analyzers must have 
    ``high-scale'' measurement capability. Select the full-scale range 
    of the instrument to be consistent with section 2.1 of this 
    appendix, and to be greater than or equal to the span value. If the 
    O2 or CO2 concentrations are expected to be consistently 
    low, a ``low scale'' measurement range may be used for increased 
    accuracy, provided that it is consistent with section 2.1 of this 
    appendix. Include a span value for the low-scale range in the 
    monitoring plan. Select the calibration gas concentrations as 
    percentages of the span value.
    
    2.1.4 Flow Monitors
    
        Select the full-scale range of the flow monitor so that it is 
    consistent with section 2.1 of this appendix, and can accurately 
    measure all potential volumetric flow rates at the flow monitor 
    installation site. For this purpose, determine the span value of the 
    flow monitor using the following procedure. Calculate the maximum 
    potential velocity (MPV) using Equation A-3a or A-3b or determine 
    the MPV or maximum potential flow rate (MPF) in scfh (wet basis) 
    from velocity traverse testing. If using test values, use the 
    highest velocity measured at or near the maximum unit operating 
    load. Calculate the MPV in units of wet standard fpm. Then, if 
    necessary, convert the MPV to equivalent units of flow rate (e.g., 
    scfh or kscfh) or differential pressure (inches of water), 
    consistent with the measurement units used for the daily calibration 
    error test to calculate the span value. Multiply the MPV (in 
    [[Page 26544]] equivalent units) by 125 percent, and round up the 
    result to no less than 2 significant figures. Report the full-scale 
    range setting, and calculations of the span value, MPV and MPF in 
    the monitoring plan for the unit.
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.006
    
    
    Where:
    
    MPV=maximum potential velocity (fpm, standard wet basis),
    Fd=dry-basis F factor (dscf/mmBtu) from Table 1, Appendix F of this 
    part,
    Fc=carbon-based F factor (scfCO2/mmBtu) from Table 1, Appendix F of 
    this part,
    Hf=maximum heat input (mmBtu/minute) for all units, combined, 
    exhausting to the stack or duct where the flow monitor is located,
    A=inside cross sectional area (ft2) of the flue at the flow monitor 
    location,
    %O2d=maximum oxygen concentration, percent dry basis, under normal 
    operating conditions,
    %CO2d=minimum carbon dioxide concentration, percent dry basis, under 
    normal operating conditions,
    %H2O = maximum percent flue gas moisture content under normal 
    operating conditions.
    
        If the volumetric flow rate exceeds the maximum potential flow 
    calculated from the maximum potential velocity but does not exceed 
    the full scale range during more than one clock hour and the flow 
    monitor can accurately measure and record values, the flow rate may 
    be reported for use in the Acid Rain Program. If the volumetric flow 
    rate exceeds the monitor's ability to measure and record values 
    accurately during a clock hour, and the full-scale exceedance is not 
    during an out-of-control period, report the full-scale value as the 
    flow rate for that clock hour. If full-scale exceedance occurs 
    during more than one hour since the last adjustment of the full-
    scale range setting, adjust the full-scale range setting to prevent 
    future exceedances. If the fuel supply, process parameters or other 
    conditions change such that the maximum potential velocity may 
    change significantly, adjust the range to assure the continued 
    accuracy of the flow monitor. Calculate an adjusted span using the 
    procedures in this section. Select the full-scale range of the 
    instrument to be greater than or equal to the adjusted span value. 
    Record and report the new full-scale range setting, calculations of 
    the span value, MPV, and MPF, and the adjusted span value in an 
    updated monitoring plan for the unit. Record and report the adjusted 
    span and reference values as parts of the records for the 
    calibration error test required by appendix B of this part. Whenever 
    the span value is adjusted, use reference values for the calibration 
    error test based on the most recent adjusted span value.
        Perform a calibration error test according to section 2.1.2 of 
    this appendix whenever making a change to the flow monitor span or 
    range. Recertification under Sec. 75.20(b) is required whenever 
    making a significant change in the flow monitor's range that 
    requires an internal modification to the monitor.
    * * * * *
        53. Appendix A to part 75, section 3 is amended by revising 
    sections 3.3.3 and 3.5 to read as follows:
    
    3. Performance Specifications
    
    * * * * *
    
    3.3  * * *
    
    3.3.1  * * *
    
    3.3.2  * * *
    
    3.3.3  Relative Accuracy for CO2 and O2 Pollutant 
    Concentration Monitors
    
        The relative accuracy for CO2 and O2 monitors shall 
    not exceed 10.0 percent. The relative accuracy test results are also 
    acceptable if the mean difference of the CO2 or O2 monitor 
    measurements and the corresponding reference method measurement, 
    calculated using Equation A-7 of this appendix, is within 1.0 
    percent CO2 or O2.
    * * * * *
    
    3.5  Cycle Time
    
        The cycle time for pollutant concentration monitors, and 
    continuous emission monitoring systems shall not exceed 15 min.
    * * * * *
        54. Appendix A to part 75, section 4 is amended by adding a third 
    paragraph to read as follows:
    
    4. Data Acquisition and Handling Systems
    
    * * * * *
        For an excepted monitoring system under appendix D or E of this 
    part, data acquisition and handling systems shall:
        (1) Read and record the full range of fuel flowrate through the 
    upper range value;
        (2) Calculate and record intermediate values necessary to obtain 
    emissions, such as mass fuel flowrate and heat input rate;
        (3) Calculate and record emissions in units of the standard (lb/
    hr of SO2, lb/mmBtu of NOX);
        (4) Predict and record NOX emission rate using the heat 
    input rate and the NOX/heat input correlation developed under 
    appendix E of this part;
        (5) Calculate and record all missing data substitution values 
    specified in appendix D or E of this part; and
        (6) Provide a continuous, permanent record of all measurements 
    and required information as an ASCII flat file capable of 
    transmission via an IBM-compatible personal computer diskette or 
    other electronic media.
    * * * * *
        55. Appendix A to part 75, section 5 is amended by revising section 
    5.1.2 and by adding sections 5.1.4, 5.1.5, and 5.1.6 to read as 
    follows:
    
    5. Calibration Gas
    
    5.1 Reference Gases
    
    5.1.1  * * *
    
    5.1.2  NIST Traceable Reference Materials
    
        Contact the Quality Assurance Division (MD 77), Environmental 
    Monitoring System Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 or the Organic 
    Analytical Research Division of NIST at the above address for 
    Standard Reference Materials for a list of vendors and cylinder 
    gases.
    
    5.1.3  * * *
    
    5.1.4  Research Gas Mixtures
    
        Contact the Quality Assurance Division (MD 77), Environmental 
    Monitoring System Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
    Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 or the Organic 
    Analytical Research Division of NIST at the above address for 
    Standard Reference Materials for a list of vendors and cylinder 
    gases.
    
    5.1.5  Zero Air Material
        Use zero air material for calibrating at zero-level 
    concentrations only. Zero air material shall be certified by the gas 
    vendor or instrument manufacturer or vendor not to contain 
    concentrations of SO2 or NOX above 0.1 ppm or CO2 
    above 400 ppm, and not to contain concentrations of other gases that 
    will interfere with instrument readings or cause the instrument to 
    read concentrations of SO2, NOX, or CO2. 
    [[Page 26545]] 
    
    5.1.6  NIST/EPA-approved Certified Reference Materials
    
        Existing certified reference materials as previously certified 
    under EPA's former certified reference material program may be used 
    for the remainder of the cylinder's shelf life.
    * * * * *
        56. Appendix A to part 75, section 6 is amended by adding a 
    sentence to the end of section 6.1; by revising the first sentence in 
    the second paragraph of section 6.2; and by revising sections 6.5, 
    6.5.1, 6.5.2, 6.5.5, 6.5.6, 6.5.7, and 6.5.10 to read as follows:
    
    6. Certification Tests and Procedures
    
    6.1  Pretest Preparation
    
        * * * To the extent practicable, test the DAHS software prior to 
    testing the monitoring hardware.
    
    6.2  Linearity Check
    
    * * * * *
        Challenge each pollutant concentration or CO2 or O2 
    monitor with NIST/EPA-approved certified reference material, NIST 
    traceable reference material, standard reference material, or 
    Protocol 1 calibration gases certified to be within 2 percent of the 
    concentration specified on the label at the low-, mid-, or high-
    level concentrations specified in section 5.2 of this appendix. * * 
    *
    * * * * *
    
    6.5  Relative Accuracy and Bias Tests
    
        Perform relative accuracy test audits for each CO2 and 
    SO2 pollutant concentration monitor, each O2 monitor used 
    to calculate heat input or CO2 concentration, each SO2-
    diluent continuous emission monitoring system (lb/mmBtu) used by 
    units with a qualifying Phase I technology for the period during 
    which the units are required to monitor SO2 emission removal 
    efficiency, from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1999, flow 
    monitor, and NOX continuous emission monitoring system. For 
    monitors or monitoring systems with dual ranges, perform the 
    relative accuracy test on one range measuring emissions in the stack 
    at the time of testing. Record monitor or monitoring system output 
    from the data acquisition and handling system. Perform concurrent 
    relative accuracy test audits for each SO2 pollutant 
    concentration monitor and flow monitor, at least once a year (see 
    section 2.3.1 of appendix B of this part), during the flow monitor 
    test at the normal operating level specified in section 6.5.2 of 
    this appendix. Concurrent relative accuracy test audits may be 
    performed by conducting simultaneous SO2 and flow relative 
    accuracy test audit runs, or by alternating an SO2 relative 
    accuracy test audit run with a flow relative accuracy test audit run 
    until all relative accuracy test audit runs are completed. Where two 
    or more probes are in the same proximity, care should be taken to 
    prevent probes from interfering with each other's sampling. For each 
    SO2 pollutant concentration monitor, each flow monitor, and 
    each NOX continuous emission monitoring system, calculate bias, 
    as well as relative accuracy, with data from the relative accuracy 
    test audits.
        Complete each relative accuracy test audit within a 7-day period 
    while the unit (or units, if more than one unit exhausts into the 
    flue) is combusting the fuel that is normal for that unit. When 
    relative accuracy test audits are performed on continuous emission 
    monitoring systems or component(s) on bypass stacks/ducts, use the 
    fuel normally combusted by the unit (or units, if more than one unit 
    exhausts into the flue) when emissions exhaust through the bypass 
    stack/ducts. Do not perform corrective maintenance, repairs, 
    replacements or adjustments during the relative accuracy test audit 
    other than as required in the operation and maintenance manual.
    
    6.5.1  SO2, O2 and CO2 Pollutant Concentration Monitors 
    and SO2-Diluent and NOX Continuous Emission Monitoring 
    Systems
    
        Perform relative accuracy test audits for each SO2, O2 
    or CO2 pollutant concentration monitor or NOX continuous 
    emission monitoring system or SO2-diluent continuous emission 
    monitoring system (lb/mmBtu) used by units with a qualifying Phase I 
    technology for the period during which the units are required to 
    monitor SO2 emission removal efficiency, from January 1, 1997 
    through December 31, 1999, at a normal operating level for the unit 
    (or combined units, if common stack).
    
    6.5.2  Flow Monitors
    
        Except for flow monitors on bypass stacks/ducts and peaking 
    units, perform relative accuracy test audits for each flow monitor 
    at three different exhaust gas velocities, expressed in terms of 
    percent of flow monitor span, or different operating or load levels. 
    For a common stack/duct, the three different exhaust gas velocities 
    may be obtained from frequently used unit/load combinations for 
    units exhausting to the common stack. Select the operating levels as 
    follows: (1) A frequently used low operating level selected within 
    the range between the minimum safe and stable operating level and 50 
    percent load, (2) a frequently used high operating level selected 
    within the range between 80 percent of the maximum operating level 
    and the maximum operating level, and (3) the normal operating level. 
    If the normal operating level is within 10.0 percent of the maximum 
    operating level of either (1) or (2) above, use a level that is 
    evenly spaced between the low and high operating levels used. The 
    maximum operating level shall be equal to the nameplate capacity 
    less any physical or regulatory limitations or other deratings. 
    Calculate flow monitor relative accuracy at each of the three 
    operating levels. If a flow monitor fails the relative accuracy test 
    on any of the three levels of a three-level relative accuracy test 
    audit, the three-level relative accuracy test audit must be 
    repeated. For flow monitors on bypass stacks/ducts and peaking 
    units, the flow monitor relative accuracy test audit is required 
    only at the normal operating level.
    
    6.5.3  * * *
    
    6.5.4  * * *
    
    6.5.5  Reference Method Measurement Location
    
        Select a location for reference method measurements that is (1) 
    accessible; (2) in the same proximity as the monitor or monitoring 
    system location; and (3) meets the requirements of Performance 
    Specification 2 in appendix B of part 60 of this chapter for 
    SO2 and NOX continuous emission monitoring systems, 
    Performance Specification 3 in appendix B of part 60 of this chapter 
    for CO2 or O2 monitors, or Method 1 (or 1A) in appendix A 
    of part 60 of this chapter for volumetric flow, except as otherwise 
    indicated in this section or as approved by the Administrator.
    
    6.5.6  Reference Method Traverse Point Selection
    
        Select traverse points that (1) ensure acquisition of 
    representative samples of pollutant and diluent concentrations, 
    moisture content, temperature, and flue gas flow rate over the flue 
    cross section; and (2) meet the requirements of Performance 
    Specification 2 in appendix B of part 60 of this chapter (for 
    SO2 and NOX), Performance Specification 3 in appendix B of 
    part 60 of this chapter (for O2 and CO2), Method 1 (or 1A) 
    (for volumetric flow), Method 3 (for molecular weight), and Method 4 
    (for moisture determination) in appendix A of part 60 of this 
    chapter.
    
    6.5.7  Sampling Strategy
    
        Conduct the reference method tests so they will yield results 
    representative of the pollutant concentration, emission rate, 
    moisture, temperature, and flue gas flow rate from the unit and can 
    be correlated with the pollutant concentration monitor, CO2 or 
    O2 monitor, flow monitor, and SO2 or NOX continuous 
    emission monitoring system measurements. Conduct the diluent 
    (O2 or CO2) measurements and any moisture measurements 
    that may be needed simultaneously with the pollutant concentration 
    and flue gas flow rate measurements. If an O2 monitor is used 
    as a CO2 continuous emission monitoring system, but not as a 
    diluent monitor, measure CO2 with the reference method. To 
    properly correlate individual SO2 and CO2 pollutant 
    concentration monitor data, O2 monitor data, SO2 or 
    NOX continuous emission monitoring system data (in lb/mmBtu), 
    and volumetric flow rate data with the reference method data, mark 
    the beginning and end of each reference method test run (including 
    the exact time of day) on the individual chart recorder(s) or other 
    permanent recording device(s).
    
    6.5.8  * * *
    
    6.5.9  * * *
    
    6.5.10  Reference Methods
    
        The following methods from appendix A to part 60 of this chapter 
    or their approved alternatives are the reference methods for 
    performing relative accuracy test audits: Method 1 or 1A for siting; 
    Method 2 (or 2A, 2C, or 2D) for velocity; Methods 3, 3A, or 3B for 
    O2 or CO2; Method 4 for moisture; [[Page 26546]] Methods 
    6, 6A, or 6C for SO2; Methods 7, 7A, 7C, 7D, 7E for NOX, 
    excluding the exception in section 5.1.2 of Method 7E. When using 
    Method 7E for measuring NOX concentration, total NOX, both 
    NO and NO2, must be measured.
    * * * * *
        58. Appendix A to part 75, section 7 is amended by revising section 
    7.2.2; by revising the section heading for section 7.3; and by revising 
    sections 7.6.4 and 7.6.5 to read as follows:
    
    7. Calculations
    
    * * * * *
    
    7.2.2  Flow Monitor Calibration Error
        For each reference value, calculate the percentage calibration 
    error based upon span using the following equation:
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.007
    
    
    where:
    
    CE=Calibration error;
    R=Low or high level reference value specified in section 2.2.2.1 of 
    this appendix;
    A=Actual flow monitor response to the reference value; and
    S=Flow monitor span or equivalent reference value (e.g., pressure 
    pulse or electronic signal).
    
    7.3  Relative Accuracy for SO2 and CO2 Pollutant 
    Concentration Monitors, SO2-Diluent Continuous Emission Monitoring 
    Systems, and Flow Monitors
    
    * * * * *
    
    7.6.4  Bias Test
    
        If the mean difference, d , is greater than the absolute value 
    of the confidence coefficient, |cc|, the monitor or monitoring 
    system has failed to meet the bias test requirement. For flow 
    monitor bias tests, if the mean difference, d, is greater than |cc| 
    at the operating level closest to normal operating level during the 
    3-level RATA, the monitor has failed to meet the bias test 
    requirement. For flow monitors, apply the bias test at the operating 
    level closest to normal operating level during the 3-level RATA.
    
    7.6.5  Bias Adjustment
    
        If the monitor or monitoring system fails to meet the bias test 
    requirement, adjust the value obtained from the monitor using the 
    following equation:
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.008
    
    
    Where:
    
    CEMi Adjusted=Data (measurement) provided by the monitor 
    at time i.
    CEMi Monitor=Data value, adjusted for bias, at time i.
    BAF=Bias adjustment factor, defined by
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.009
    
    
    Where:
    
    BAF=Bias adjustment factor, calculated to the nearest thousandth.
    d=Arithmetic mean of the difference obtained during the failed bias 
    test using Equation A-7.
    CEM=Mean of the data values provided by the monitor during the 
    failed bias test.
    
        If the bias test is failed by a flow monitor at the operating 
    level closest to normal on a 3-level relative accuracy test audit, 
    calculate the bias adjustment factor for each of the three operating 
    levels. Apply the largest of the three bias adjustment factors to 
    subsequent flow monitor data using Equation A-11.
        Apply this adjustment prospectively to all monitor or monitoring 
    system data from the date and time of the failed bias test until the 
    date and time of a relative accuracy test audit that does not show 
    bias. Use the adjusted values in computing substitution values in 
    the missing data procedure, as specified in subpart D of this part, 
    and in reporting the concentration of SO2, the flow rate, and 
    the average NO emission rate and calculated mass emissions 
    of SO2 and CO2 during the quarter and calendar year, as 
    specified in subpart G of this part.
    * * * * *
    
    APPENDIX B TO PART 75--QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL 
    PROCEDURES
    
        59. Appendix B to part 75, section 2 is amended by revising 
    sections 2.1.4, 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, and 2.3.2; and by 
    amending Figure 2 at the end of the appendix to read as follows:
    * * * * *
    
    2. Frequency of Testing
    
    2.1  Daily Assessments * * *
    2.1.1  * * *
    
    2.1.2  * * *
    
    2.1.3  * * *
    
    2.1.4  Recalibration
    
        The EPA recommends adjusting the calibration, at a minimum, 
    whenever the daily calibration error exceeds the limits of the 
    applicable performance specification for the pollutant concentration 
    monitor, CO2, or O2 monitor, or flow monitor in appendix A 
    of this part.
    * * * * *
    
    2.2  Quarterly Assessments
    
        For each monitor or continuous emission monitoring system, 
    perform the following assessments during each unit operating 
    quarter, or for monitors or monitoring systems on bypass ducts or 
    bypass stacks, during each bypass operating quarter to be performed 
    not less than once every 2 calendar years. This requirement is 
    effective as of the calendar quarter following the calendar quarter 
    in which the monitor or continuous emission monitoring system is 
    provisionally certified.
    
    2.2.1  Linearity Check
    
        Perform a linearity check for each SO2 and NO 
    pollutant concentration monitor and each CO2 or O2 monitor 
    at least once during each unit operating quarter or each bypass 
    operating quarter, in accordance with the procedures in appendix A, 
    section 6.2 of this part. For units using emission controls and 
    other units using a low-scale span value to determine calibration 
    gases, perform a linearity check on both the low- and high-scales. 
    Conduct the linearity checks no less than 2 months apart, to the 
    extent practicable.
    
    2.2.2  Leak Check
    
        For differential pressure flow monitors, perform a leak check of 
    all sample lines (a manual check is acceptable) at least once during 
    each unit operating quarter or each bypass operating quarter. 
    Conduct the leak checks no less than 2 months apart, to the extent 
    practicable.
    
    2.2.3  * * *
    
    2.3  Semiannual and Annual Assessments
    
        For each monitor or continuous emission monitoring system, 
    perform the following assessments once semiannually (within two 
    calendar quarters) or once annually (within four calendar quarters) 
    after the calendar quarter in which the monitor or monitoring system 
    was last tested, as specified below for the type of test and the 
    performance achieved, except as provided below in section 2.3.1 of 
    this appendix for monitors or continuous emission monitoring systems 
    on bypass ducts or stacks or on peaking units. This requirement is 
    effective as of the calendar quarter, unit operating quarter (for 
    peaking units), or bypass operating quarter (for bypass stacks or 
    ducts) following the calendar quarter in which the monitor or 
    continuous emission monitoring system is provisionally certified. A 
    summary chart showing the frequency with which a relative accuracy 
    test audit must be performed, depending on the accuracy achieved, is 
    located at the end of this appendix in Figure 2.
    
    2.3.1  Relative Accuracy Test Audit
    
        Perform relative accuracy test audits semiannually and, to the 
    extent practicable, no less than 4 months apart for each SO2 or 
    CO2 pollutant concentration monitor, flow monitor, NO 
    continuous emission monitoring system, or SO2-diluent 
    continuous emission monitoring systems used by units with a Phase I 
    qualifying technology for the period during which the units are 
    required to monitor SO2 emission removal efficiency, from 
    January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1999, except as provided for 
    monitors or continuous [[Page 26547]] emission monitoring systems on 
    peaking units or bypass stacks or ducts. For monitors on bypass 
    stacks/ducts, perform relative accuracy test audits no less than 
    once every two successive bypass operating quarters, or once every 
    two calendar years, whichever occurs first, in accordance with the 
    procedures in section 6.5 of Appendix A of this part. For monitors 
    on peaking units, perform relative accuracy test audits no less than 
    once every two successive unit operating quarters, or once every two 
    calendar years, whichever occurs first. Audits required under this 
    section shall be performed no less than 4 months apart, to the 
    extent practicable. The audit frequency may be reduced, as specified 
    below for monitors or monitoring systems which qualify for less 
    frequent testing.
        For flow monitors, one-level and three-level relative accuracy 
    test audits shall be performed alternately (when a flow RATA is 
    conducted semiannually), such that the three-level relative accuracy 
    test audit is performed at least once annually. The three-level 
    audit shall be performed at the three different operating or load 
    levels specified in appendix A, section 6.5.2 of this part, and the 
    one-level audit shall be performed at the normal operating or load 
    level. Notwithstanding that requirement, relative accuracy test 
    audits need only be performed at the normal operating or load level 
    for monitors and continuous emission monitoring systems on peaking 
    units and bypass stacks/ducts.
        Relative accuracy test audits may be performed on an annual 
    basis rather than on a semiannual basis (or for monitors on peaking 
    units and bypass ducts or bypass stacks, no less than (1) once every 
    four successive unit or bypass operating quarters, or (2) every two 
    calendar years, whichever occurs first) under any of the following 
    conditions: (1) The relative accuracy during the previous audit for 
    an SO2 or CO2 pollutant concentration monitor (including 
    an O2 pollutant monitor used to measure CO2 using the 
    procedures in appendix F of this part), or for a NO or 
    SO2-diluent continuous emissions monitoring system is 7.5 
    percent or less; (2) prior to January 1, 2000, the relative accuracy 
    during the previous audit for a flow monitor is 10.0 percent or less 
    at each operating level tested; (3) on and after January 1, 2000, 
    the relative accuracy during the previous audit for a flow monitor 
    is 7.5 percent or less at each operating level tested; (4) on low 
    flow (10.0 fps) stacks/ducts, when the monitor mean, 
    calculated using Equation A-7 in appendix A of this part is within 
    1.5 fps of the reference method mean or achieves a 
    relative accuracy of 7.5 percent (10 percent if prior to January 1, 
    2000) or less during the previous audit; (5) on low SO2 
    emitting units (SO2 concentrations 250.0 ppm, or 
    equivalent lb/mmBtu value for SO2-diluent continuous emission 
    monitoring systems), when the monitor mean is within 8.0 
    ppm (or equivalent in lb/mmBtu for SO2-diluent continuous 
    emission monitoring systems) of the reference method mean or 
    achieves a relative accuracy of 7.5 percent or less during the 
    previous audit; or (6) on low NOX emitting units (NOX 
    emission rate 0.20 lb/mmBtu), when the NO 
    continuous emission monitoring system achieves a relative accuracy 
    of 7.5 percent or less or when the monitoring system mean, 
    calculated using Equation A-7 in appendix A of this part is within 
    0.01 lb/mmBtu of the reference method mean.
        A maximum of two relative accuracy test audit trials may be 
    performed for the purpose of achieving the results required to 
    qualify for less frequent relative accuracy test audits. Whenever 
    two trials are performed, the results of the second (later) trial 
    must be used in calculating both the relative accuracy and bias.
    
    2.3.2  Out-of-Control Period
    
        An out-of-control period occurs under any of the following 
    conditions: (1) The relative accuracy of an SO2, CO2, or 
    O2 pollutant concentration monitor or a NOX or SO2-
    diluent continuous emission monitoring system exceeds 10.0 percent; 
    (2) prior to January 1, 2000, the relative accuracy of a flow 
    monitor exceeds 15.0 percent; (3) on and after January 1, 2000, the 
    relative accuracy of a flow monitor exceeds 10.0 percent; (4) for 
    low flow situations (10.0 fps), the flow monitor mean 
    value (if applicable) exceeds 2.0 fps of the reference 
    method mean whenever the relative accuracy is greater than 15.0 
    percent for Phase I or 10 percent for Phase II; (5) for low SO2 
    emitter situations, the monitor mean values exceeds 15.0 
    ppm (or  0.03 lb/mmBtu for SO2-diluent continuous 
    emission monitoring systems from January 1, 1997 through December 
    31, 1999) of the reference method mean whenever the relative 
    accuracy is greater than 10.0 percent; or (6) for low NOX 
    emitting units (NOX emission rate 0.2 lb/mmBtu), the 
    NOX continuous emission monitoring system mean values exceed 
    0.02 lb/mmBtu of the reference method mean whenever the 
    relative accuracy is greater than 10.0 percent. For SO2, 
    CO2, O2, NOX emission rate, and flow relative 
    accuracy test audits performed at only one level, the out-of-control 
    period begins with the hour of completion of the failed relative 
    accuracy test audit and ends with the hour of completion of a 
    satisfactory relative accuracy test audit. For a flow relative 
    accuracy test audit at 3 operating levels, the out-of-control period 
    begins with the hour of completion of the first failed relative 
    accuracy test audit at any of the three operating levels, and ends 
    with the hour of completion of a satisfactory three-level relative 
    accuracy test audit.
        Failure of the bias test does not result in the system or 
    monitor being out-of-control.
    * * * * *
    
                              Figure 2.--Relative Accuracy Test Frequency Incentive System                          
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Semiannually\1\                                            
                          RATA                              (percent)                       Annual\1\               
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    SO2.............................................  RA  10     RA  7.5% or 8.0  
                                                                             ppm.\2\                                
    NOX.............................................  RA  10     RA  7.5% or 0.01 
                                                                             lb/mmBtu.\2\                           
    Flow (Phase I)\3\...............................  RA  15     RA  10% or  1.5  
                                                                             fps.\2\                                
    Flow (Phase II)\3\..............................  RA  10     RA  7.5% or  1.5 
                                                                             fps.\2\                                
    CO2/O2..........................................  RA  10     RA  7.5%.                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\For monitors on bypass stack/duct, bypass operating quarters, not to exceed two calendar years. For monitors 
      on peaking units, unit operating quarters, not to exceed two calendar years.                                  
    \2\The difference between monitor and reference method mean values; low emitters or low flow, only.             
    \3\Conduct 3-load RATAs annually, if requirements to qualify for less frequent testing are met.                 
    
    Appendix C to Part 75--Missing Data Estimation Procedures
    
        60. Appendix C to part 75, section 1 is amended by revising the 
    section heading and the first paragraph of section 1.2 and by revising 
    the first paragraph of section 1.3 to read as follows:
    
    1. Parametric Monitoring Procedure for Missing SO2 Concentration 
    or NOX Emission Rate Data
    
    * * * * *
    
    1.2  Petition Requirements
    
        Continuously monitor, determine, and record hourly averages of 
    the estimated SO2 or NOX removal efficiency and of the 
    parameters specified below, at a minimum. The affected facility 
    shall supply additional parametric information where appropriate. 
    Measure the SO2 concentration or NOX emission rate, 
    removal efficiency of the add-on emission controls, and the 
    parameters for at least 2160 unit operating hours. Provide 
    information for all expected operating conditions and removal 
    efficiencies. At least 4 evenly spaced data points are required for 
    a valid hourly average, except during periods of calibration, 
    maintenance, or quality assurance activities, during which 2 data 
    points per hour are sufficient. The [[Page 26548]] Administrator 
    will review all applications on a case-by-case basis.
    * * * * *
    
    1.3  Correlation of Emissions With Parameters
    
        Establish a method for correlating hourly averages of the 
    parameters identified above with the percent removal efficiency of 
    the SO2 or post-combustion NOX emission controls under 
    varying unit operating loads. Equations 1-7 in Sec. 75.15 may be 
    used to estimate the percent removal efficiency of the SO2 
    emission controls on an hourly basis.
    * * * * *
        61. Appendix C to part 75, section 2 is amended by revising section 
    2.2.1, Table C-1, and sections 2.2.3, 2.2.3.1, 2.2.3.5, and 2.2.5 to 
    read as follows:
    * * * * *
    
    2. Procedure
    
        2.2.1  For a single unit, establish 10 operating load ranges 
    defined in terms of percent of the maximum hourly gross load of the 
    unit, in gross megawatts (MWge), as shown in Table C-1. For units 
    sharing a common stack monitored with a single flow monitor, the 
    load ranges for flow (but not for NOX) may be broken down into 
    20 equally-sized operating load ranges in increments of 5 percent of 
    the combined maximum hourly gross load of all units utilizing the 
    common stack. For a cogenerating unit or other unit at which some 
    portion of the heat input is not used to produce electricity or for 
    a unit for which hourly gross load in MWge is not recorded 
    separately, use the hourly gross steam load of the unit, in pounds 
    of steam per hour at the measured temperature ( deg.F) and pressure 
    (psia) instead of MWge. Indicate a change in the number of load 
    ranges or the units of loads to be used in the precertification 
    section of the monitoring plan.
    
         Table C-1.--Definition of Operating Load Ranges for Load-Based     
                          Substitution Data Procedures                      
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent of  
                      Operating load range                    maximum hourly
                                                              gross load (%)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1.......................................................            0-10
    2.......................................................           10-20
    3.......................................................           20-30
    4.......................................................           30-40
    5.......................................................           40-50
    6.......................................................           50-60
    7.......................................................           60-70
    8.......................................................           70-80
    9.......................................................           80-90
    10......................................................          90-100
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        2.2.2  * * *
        2.2.3  Beginning with the first hour of unit operation after 
    installation and certification of the flow monitor or the NOX 
    continuous emission monitoring system and continuing thereafter, the 
    data acquisition and handling system must be capable of calculating 
    and recording the following information for each unit operating hour 
    of missing flow or NOX data within each identified load range 
    during the shorter of: (1) the previous 2,160 quality assured 
    monitor operating hours (on a rolling basis), or (2) all previous 
    quality assured monitor operating hours.
        2.2.3.1  Average of the hourly flow rates reported by a flow 
    monitor, in scfh.
        2.2.3.2  * * *
        2.2.3.3  * * *
        2.2.3.4  * * *
        2.2.3.5  Average of the hourly NOX emission rate, in lb/
    mmBtu, reported by a NOX continuous emission monitoring system.
        2.2.3.6  * * *
        2.2.3.7  * * *
        2.2.3.8  * * *
        2.2.4  * * *
        2.2.5  When a bias adjustment is necessary for the flow monitor 
    and/or the NOX continuous emission monitoring system, apply the 
    adjustment factor to all monitor or continuous emission monitoring 
    system data values placed in the load ranges.
        2.2.6  * * *
    
    Appendix D to Part 75--Optional SO2 Emissions Data Protocol 
    for Gas-Fired and Oil-Fired Units
    
        62. Appendix D to part 75, section 1 is amended by revising section 
    1.1; by removing section 1.2 and revising and redesignating section 1.3 
    as section 1.2; and by removing section 1.4 to read as follows:
    
    1. Applicability
    
        1.1  This protocol may be used in lieu of continuous SO2 
    pollutant concentration and flow monitors for the purpose of 
    determining hourly SO2 emissions and heat input from: (1) gas-
    fired units as defined in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter; or (2) oil-
    fired units as defined in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter. This optional 
    SO2 emissions data protocol contains procedures for conducting 
    oil sampling and analysis in section 2.2 of this appendix; the 
    procedures for flow proportional oil sampling and the procedures for 
    manual daily oil sampling may be used for any gas-fired unit or oil-
    fired unit. In addition, this optional SO2 emissions data 
    protocol contains two procedures for determining SO2 emissions 
    due to the combustion of gaseous fuels; these two procedures may be 
    used for any gas-fired unit or oil-fired unit.
        1.2  Pursuant to the procedures in Sec. 75.20, complete all 
    testing requirements to certify use of this protocol in lieu of a 
    flow monitor and an SO2 continuous emission monitoring system. 
    Complete all testing requirements no later than the applicable 
    deadline specified in Sec. 75.4. Apply to the Administrator for 
    initial certification to use this protocol no later than 45 days 
    after the completion of all certification tests. Whenever the 
    monitoring method is to be changed, reapply to the Administrator for 
    recertification of the new monitoring method.
    
        63. Appendix D to part 75, section 2 is revised to read as follows:
    
    2. Procedure
    
    2.1  Flowmeter Measurements
    
        For each hour when the unit is combusting fuel, measure and 
    record the flow of fuel combusted by the unit, except as provided 
    for gas in section 2.1.4 of this appendix. Measure the flow of fuel 
    with an in-line fuel flowmeter and automatically record the data 
    with a data acquisition and handling system, except as provided in 
    section 2.1.4 of this appendix.
        2.1.1  Measure the flow of each fuel entering and being 
    combusted by the unit. If a portion of the flow is diverted from the 
    unit without being burned, and that diversion occurs downstream of 
    the fuel flowmeter, an additional in-line fuel flowmeter is required 
    to account for the unburned fuel. Record the flow of each fuel 
    combusted by the unit as the difference between the flow measured in 
    the pipe leading to the unit and the flow in the pipe diverting fuel 
    away from the unit.
        2.1.2  Install and use fuel flowmeters meeting the requirements 
    of this appendix in a pipe going to each unit, or install and use a 
    fuel flowmeter in a common pipe header (i.e., a pipe carrying fuel 
    for multiple units). If the flowmeter is installed in a common pipe 
    header, do one of the following:
        2.1.2.1  Measure the fuel flow in the common pipe and combine 
    SO2 mass emissions for the affected units for recordkeeping and 
    compliance purposes; or
        2.1.2.2  Provide information satisfactory to the Administrator 
    on methods for apportioning SO2 mass emissions and heat input 
    to each of the affected units demonstrating that the method ensures 
    complete and accurate accounting of all emissions regulated under 
    this part. The information shall be provided to the Administrator 
    through a petition submitted by the designated representative under 
    Sec. 75.66. Satisfactory information includes apportionment using 
    fuel flow measurements, the ratio of load (in MWe) in each unit to 
    the total load for all units receiving fuel from the common pipe 
    header, or the ratio of steam flow (in 1000 lb/hr) at each unit to 
    the total steam flow for all units receiving fuel from the common 
    pipe header.
        2.1.3  For a gas-fired unit or an oil-fired unit that 
    continuously or frequently combusts a supplemental fuel for flame 
    stabilization or safety purposes, measure the flow of the 
    supplemental fuel with a fuel flowmeter meeting the requirements of 
    this appendix.
        2.1.4  For an oil-fired unit that uses gas solely for start-up 
    or burner ignition or a gas-fired unit that uses oil solely for 
    start-up or burner ignition a flowmeter for the start-up fuel is not 
    required. Estimate the volume of oil combusted for each start-up or 
    ignition, either by using a fuel flowmeter or by using the 
    dimensions of the storage container and measuring the depth of the 
    fuel in the storage container before and after each start-up or 
    ignition. A fuel flowmeter used solely for start-up or ignition fuel 
    is not subject to the calibration requirements of section 2.1.5 and 
    2.1.6 of this appendix. Gas combusted solely for start-up or burner 
    ignition does not need to be measured separately.
        2.1.5  Each fuel flowmeter used to meet the requirements of this 
    protocol shall meet [[Page 26549]] a flowmeter accuracy of 
    2.0 percent of the upper range value (i.e, maximum 
    calibrated fuel flow rate), either by design or as calibrated and as 
    measured under laboratory conditions by the manufacturer, by an 
    independent laboratory, or by the owner or operator. The flowmeter 
    accuracy must include all error from all parts of the fuel flowmeter 
    being calibrated based upon the contribution to the error in the 
    flowrate.
        2.1.5.1  Use the procedures in the following standards for 
    flowmeter calibration or flowmeter design, as appropriate to the 
    type of flowmeter: ASME MFC-3M-1989 with September 1990 Errata 
    (``Measurement of Fluid Flow in Pipes Using Orifice, Nozzle, and 
    Venturi''), ASME MFC-4M-1986 (Reaffirmed 1990), ``Measurement of Gas 
    Flow by Turbine Meters,'' American Gas Association Report No. 3, 
    ``Orifice Metering of Natural Gas and Other Related Hydrocarbon 
    Fluids Part 1: General Equations and Uncertainty Guidelines'' 
    (October 1990 Edition), Part 2: ``Specification and Installation 
    Requirements'' (February 1991 Edition) and Part 3: ``Natural Gas 
    Applications'' (August 1992 edition), (excluding the modified flow-
    calculation method in Part 3) ASME MFC-5M-1985 (``Measurement of 
    Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits Using Transit-Time Ultrasonic 
    Flowmeters''), ASME MFC-6M-1987 with June 1987 Errata (``Measurement 
    of Fluid Flow in Pipes Using Vortex Flow Meters''), ASME MFC-7M-1987 
    (Reaffirmed 1992), ``Measurement of Gas Flow by Means of Critical 
    Flow Venturi Nozzles,'' ISO 8316: 1987(E) ``Measurement of Liquid 
    Flow in Closed Conduits--Method by Collection of the Liquid in a 
    Volumetric Tank,'' or MFC-9M-1988 with December 1989 Errata 
    (``Measurement of Liquid Flow in Closed Conduits by Weighing 
    Method'') for all other flow meter types (incorporated by reference 
    under Sec. 75.6 of this part). The Administrator may also approve 
    other procedures that use equipment traceable to National Institute 
    of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards. Document other 
    procedures, the equipment used, and the accuracy of the procedures 
    in the monitoring plan for the unit and a petition submitted by the 
    designated representative under Sec. 75.66(c). If the flowmeter 
    accuracy exceeds 2.0 percent of the upper range value, 
    the flowmeter does not qualify for use under this part.
        2.1.5.2  Alternatively, a fuel flowmeter used for the purposes 
    of this part may be calibrated or recalibrated at least annually 
    (or, for fuel flowmeters measuring emergency fuel, bypass fuel or 
    fuel usage of peaking units, every four calendar quarters when the 
    unit combusts the fuel measured by the fuel flowmeter) by comparing 
    the measured flow of a flowmeter to the measured flow from another 
    flowmeter which has been calibrated or recalibrated during the 
    previous 365 days using a standard listed in section 2.1.5 of this 
    appendix or other procedure approved by the Administrator under 
    Sec. 75.66. Any secondary elements, such as pressure and temperature 
    transmitters, must be calibrated immediately prior to the 
    comparison. Perform the comparison over a period of no more than 
    seven consecutive unit operating days. Compare the average of three 
    fuel flow readings for each meter at each of three different flow 
    levels, corresponding to (1) normal full operating load, (2) normal 
    minimum operating load, and (3) a load point approximately equally 
    spaced between the full and minimum operating loads. Calculate the 
    flowmeter accuracy at each of the three flow levels using the 
    following equation:
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.010
    
    
    Where:
    
    ACC=Flow meter accuracy as a percentage of the upper range value, 
    including all error from all parts of both flowmeters.
    R=Average of the three flow measurements of the reference flow 
    meter.
    A=Average of the three measurements of the flow meter being tested.
    URV=Upper range value of fuel flow meter being tested (i.e. maximum 
    measurable flow).
    
        If the flow meter accuracy exceeds 2.0 percent of 
    the upper range value at any of the three flow levels, either 
    recalibrate the flow meter until the accuracy is within the 
    performance specification, or replace the flow meter with another 
    one that is within the performance specification. Notwithstanding 
    the requirement for annual calibration of the reference flowmeter, 
    if a reference flowmeter and the flowmeter being tested are within 
    1.0 percent of the flowrate of each other during all in-
    place calibrations in a calendar year, then the reference flowmeter 
    does not need to be calibrated before the next in-place calibration. 
    This exception to calibration requirements for the reference 
    flowmeter may be extended for periods up to five calendar years.
    
    2.1.6  Quality Assurance
    
        2.1.6.1  Recalibrate each fuel flowmeter to a flowmeter accuracy 
    of 2.0 percent of the upper range value prior to use 
    under this part at least annually (or, for fuel flowmeters measuring 
    emergency fuel, bypass fuel or fuel usage of peaking units, every 
    four calendar quarters when the unit combusts the fuel measured by 
    the fuel flowmeter), or more frequently if required by manufacturer 
    specifications. Perform the recalibration using the procedures in 
    section 2.1.5 of this appendix. For orifice-, nozzle-, and venturi-
    type flowmeters, also recalibrate the flowmeter the following 
    calendar quarter using the procedures in section 2.1.6.2 of this 
    appendix, whenever the fuel flowmeter accuracy during a calibration 
    or test is greater than 1.0 percent of the upper range 
    value, or whenever a visual inspection of the orifice, nozzle, or 
    venturi identifies corrosion since the previous visual inspection.
        2.1.6.2  For orifice-, nozzle-, and venturi-type flowmeters that 
    are designed according to the standards in section 2.1.5 of this 
    appendix, satisfy the calibration requirements of this appendix by 
    calibrating the differential pressure transmitter or transducer, 
    static pressure transmitter or transducer, and temperature 
    transmitter or transducer, as applicable, using equipment that has a 
    current certificate of traceability to NIST standards. In addition, 
    conduct a visual inspection of the orifice, nozzle, or venturi at 
    least annually.
    
    2.2  Oil Sampling and Analysis
    
        Perform sampling and analysis of as-fired oil to determine the 
    percentage of sulfur by weight in the oil.
        2.2.1  When combusting diesel fuel, sample the diesel fuel 
    either (1) every day the unit combusts diesel fuel, or (2) upon 
    receipt of a shipment of diesel fuel.
        2.2.1.1  If the diesel fuel is sampled every day, use either the 
    flow proportional method described in section 2.2.3 of this appendix 
    or the daily manual method described in section 2.2.4 of this 
    appendix.
        2.2.1.2  If the diesel fuel is sampled upon delivery, calculate 
    SO2 emissions using the highest sulfur content of any oil 
    supply combusted in the previous 30 days that the unit combusted 
    oil. Diesel fuel sampling and analysis may be performed either by 
    the owner or operator of an affected unit, an outside laboratory, or 
    a fuel supplier, provided that sampling is performed according to 
    ASTM D4057-88, ``Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum 
    and Petroleum Products'' (incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6 
    of this part).
        2.2.2  Perform oil sampling every day the unit is combusting oil 
    except as provided for diesel fuel. Use either the flow proportional 
    method described in section 2.2.3 of this appendix or the daily 
    manual method described in section 2.2.4 of this appendix.
        2.2.3  Conduct flow proportional oil sampling or continuous drip 
    oil sampling in accordance with ASTM D4177-82 (Reapproved 1990), 
    ``Standard Practice for Automatic Sampling of Petroleum and 
    Petroleum Products'' (incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6), 
    every day the unit is combusting oil. Extract oil at least once 
    every hour and blend into a daily composite sample. The sample 
    composite period may not exceed 24 hr.
        2.2.4  Representative as-fired oil samples may be taken manually 
    every day that the unit combusts oil according to ASTM D4057-88, 
    ``Standard Practice for Manual Sampling of Petroleum and Petroleum 
    Products'' (incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6), provided 
    that the highest fuel sulfur content recorded at that unit from the 
    most recent 30 daily samples is used for the purposes of calculating 
    SO2 emissions under section 3 of this appendix. Use the gross 
    calorific value measured from that day's sample to calculate heat 
    input. If oil supplies with different sulfur contents are combusted 
    on the same day, sample the highest sulfur fuel combusted that day.
    
        Note: For units with pressurized fuel flow lines such as some 
    diesel and dual-fuel reciprocating internal combustion engine units, 
    a manual sample may be taken from the point closest to the unit 
    where it is safe to take a sample (including back to the oil tank), 
    rather than just prior to entry to the boiler or combustion chamber. 
    As-delivered manual samples of diesel fuel need not be as-fired.
    
        2.2.5  Split and label each oil sample. Maintain a portion (at 
    least 200 cc) of each sample throughout the calendar year and in all 
    cases for not less than 90 calendar days [[Page 26550]] after the 
    end of the calendar year allowance accounting period. Analyze oil 
    samples for percent sulfur content by weight in accordance with ASTM 
    D129-91, ``Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products 
    (General Bomb Method),'' ASTM D1552-90, ``Standard Test Method for 
    Sulfur in Petroleum Products (High Temperature Method),'' ASTM 
    D2622-92, ``Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Products by 
    X-Ray Spectrometry,'' or ASTM D4294-90, ``Standard Test Method for 
    Sulfur in Petroleum Products by Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence 
    Spectroscopy'' (incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6).
        2.2.6  Where the flowmeter records volumetric flow rather than 
    mass flow, analyze oil samples to determine the density or specific 
    gravity of the oil. Determine the density or specific gravity of the 
    oil sample in accordance with ASTM D287-82 (Reapproved 1991), 
    ``Standard Test Method for API Gravity of Crude Petroleum and 
    Petroleum Products (Hydrometer Method),'' ASTM D941-88, ``Standard 
    Test Method for Density and Relative Density (Specific Gravity) of 
    Liquids by Lipkin Bicapillary Pycnometer,'' ASTM D1217-91, 
    ``Standard Test Method for Density and Relative Density (Specific 
    Gravity) of Liquids by Bingham Pycnometer,'' ASTM D1481-91, 
    ``Standard Test Method for Density and Relative Density (Specific 
    Gravity) of Viscous Materials by Lipkin Bicapillary,'' ASTM D1480-
    91, ``Standard Test Method for Density and Relative Density 
    (Specific Gravity) of Viscous Materials by Bingham Pycnometer,'' 
    ASTM D1298-85 (Reapproved 1990), ``Standard Practice for Density, 
    Relative Density (Specific Gravity) or API Gravity of Crude 
    Petroleum and Liquid Petroleum Products by Hydrometer Method,'' or 
    ASTM D4052-91, ``Standard Test Method for Density and Relative 
    Density of Liquids by Digital Density Meter'' (incorporated by 
    reference under Sec. 75.6).
        2.2.7  Analyze oil samples to determine the heat content of the 
    fuel. Determine oil heat content in accordance with ASTM D240-87 
    (Reapproved 1991), ``Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of 
    Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter,'' ASTM D2382-88, 
    ``Standard Test Method for Heat or Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels 
    by Bomb Calorimeter (High-Precision Method)'', or ASTM D2015-91, 
    ``Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by 
    the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter'' (incorporated by reference under 
    Sec. 75.6) or any other procedures listed in section 5.5 of appendix 
    F of this part.
        2.2.8  Results from the oil sample analysis must be available no 
    later than thirty calendar days after the sample is composited or 
    taken. However, during an audit, the Administrator may require that 
    the results of the analysis be available within 5 business days, or 
    sooner if practicable.
    2.3  SO2 Emissions from Combustion of Gaseous Fuels
    
        Account for the hourly SO2 mass emissions due to combustion 
    of gaseous fuels for each day when gaseous fuels are combusted by 
    the unit using the procedures in either section 2.3.1 or 2.3.2.
        2.3.1  Sample the gaseous fuel daily.
        2.3.1.1  Analyze the sulfur content of the gaseous fuel in 
    grain/100 scf using ASTM D1072-90, ``Standard Test Method for Total 
    Sulfur in Fuel Gases'', ASTM D4468-85 (Reapproved 1989) ``Standard 
    Test Method for Total Sulfur in Gaseous Fuels by Hydrogenolysis and 
    Rateometric Colorimetry,'' ASTM D5504-94 ``Standard Test Method for 
    Determination of Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels 
    by Gas Chromatography and Chemiluminescence,'' or ASTM D3246-81 
    (Reapproved 1987) ``Standard Test Method for Sulfur in Petroleum Gas 
    By Oxidative Microcoulometry'' (incorporated by reference under 
    Sec. 75.6). The test may be performed by the owner or operator, an 
    outside laboratory, or the gas supplier.
        2.3.1.2  Results from the analysis must be available on-site no 
    later than thirty calendar days after the sample is taken.
        2.3.1.3  Determine the heat content or gross calorific value for 
    at least one sample each month and use the procedures of section 5.5 
    of appendix F of this part to determine the heat input for each hour 
    the unit combusted gaseous fuel.
        2.3.1.4  Multiply the sulfur content by the hourly metered 
    volume of gas combusted in 100 scf, using Equation D-4 of this 
    appendix.
        2.3.2  If the fuel is pipeline natural gas, calculate SO2 
    emissions using a default SO2 emission rate of 0.0006 lb/mmBtu.
        2.3.2.1  Use the default SO2 emission rate of 0.0006 lb/
    mmBtu and the hourly heat input from pipeline natural gas in mmBtu/
    hr, as determined using the procedures in section 5.5 of appendix F 
    of this part. Calculate SO2 emissions using Equation D-5 of 
    this appendix.
        2.3.2.2  Provide information on the contractual sulfur content 
    from the pipeline gas supplier in the monitoring plan for the unit, 
    demonstrating that the gas has a hydrogen sulfide content of 1 
    grain/100 scf or less, and a total sulfur content of 20 grain/100 
    scf or less.
    
    2.4  Missing Data Procedures.
    
        When data from the procedures of this part are not available, 
    provide substitute data using the following procedures.
        2.4.1  When sulfur content or oil density data from the analysis 
    of an oil sample or when sulfur content data from the analysis of a 
    gaseous fuel sample are missing or invalid, substitute, as 
    applicable, the highest measured sulfur content or oil density (if 
    using a volumetric oil flowmeter) recorded during the previous 30 
    days when the unit burned that fuel. If no previous sulfur content 
    data are available, substitute the maximum potential sulfur content 
    of that fuel.
        2.4.2  When gross calorific value data from the analysis of an 
    oil sample are missing or invalid, substitute the highest measured 
    gross calorific value recorded during the previous 30 days that the 
    unit burned oil. When gross calorific value data from the analysis 
    of a monthly gaseous fuel sample are missing or invalid, substitute 
    the highest measured gross calorific value recorded during the 
    previous three months that the unit burned gaseous fuel.
        2.4.3  Whenever data are missing from any fuel flowmeter that is 
    part of an excepted monitoring system under appendix D or E of this 
    part, where the fuel flowmeter data are required to determine the 
    amount of fuel combusted by the unit, use the procedures in either 
    section 2.4.3.1 or sections 2.4.3.2 and 2.4.3.3 prior to January 1, 
    1996 and use the procedures in sections 2.4.3.2 and 2.4.3.3 but do 
    not use the procedures in section 2.4.3.1 on or after January 1, 
    1996 to account for the flow rate of fuel combusted at the unit for 
    each hour during the missing data period.
        2.4.3.1  When data from the fuel flowmeter are missing, 
    substitute for each hour in the missing data period the average 
    hourly oil flow rate measured and recorded by the fuel flowmeter at 
    the closest unit load (in MWe) greater than the load recorded for 
    the missing data period for which oil flow rate data are available 
    during the previous 720 hours during which the unit combusted oil. 
    If no oil flow rate data are available at a load greater than the 
    load recorded during the missing data period, substitute the maximum 
    flow rate that the flowmeter can measure.
        2.4.3.2  For hours where only one fuel is combusted, substitute 
    for each hour in the missing data period the average of the hourly 
    fuel flow rate(s) measured and recorded by the fuel flowmeter (or 
    flowmeters, where fuel is recirculated) at the corresponding 
    operating unit load range recorded for each missing hour during the 
    previous 720 hours during which the unit combusted that same fuel 
    only. Establish load ranges for the unit using the procedures of 
    section 2 in appendix C of this part for missing volumetric flow 
    rate data. If no fuel flow rate data are available at the 
    corresponding load range, use data from the next higher load range 
    where data are available. If no fuel flow rate data are available at 
    either the corresponding load range or a higher load range during 
    any hour of the missing data period for that fuel, substitute the 
    maximum potential fuel flow rate. The maximum potential fuel flow 
    rate is the lesser of the following: (1) the maximum fuel flow rate 
    the unit is capable of combusting or (2) the maximum flow rate that 
    the flowmeter can measure.
        2.4.3.3  For hours where two or more fuels are combusted, 
    substitute the maximum hourly fuel flow rate measured and recorded 
    by the flowmeter (or flowmeters, where fuel is recirculated) for the 
    fuel for which data are missing at the corresponding load range 
    recorded for each missing hour during the previous 720 hours when 
    the unit combusted that fuel with any other fuel. For hours where no 
    previous recorded fuel flow rate data are available for that fuel 
    during the missing data period, calculate and substitute the maximum 
    potential flow rate of that fuel for the unit as defined in section 
    2.4.3.2 of this appendix.
        2.4.4.  In any case where the missing data provisions of this 
    section require substitution of data measured and recorded more than 
    three years (26,280 clock hours) prior to the date and time of the 
    missing data period, use three years (26,280 clock hours) in place 
    of the prescribed lookback period.
    * * * * * [[Page 26551]] 
        64. Appendix D to part 75, section 3 is amended by revising the 
    introductory paragraph; by revising the section heading of section 3.1; 
    by revising the definition of the variable ``MSO2'' in Equation D-
    2 in section 3.1.1; by revising section 3.1.2; by revising the section 
    heading of section 3.2; by revising section 3.2.1; and by adding 
    sections 3.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, and 3.4 to read as follows:
    
    3. Calculations
    
        Use the calculation procedures in section 3.1 of this appendix 
    to calculate SO2 mass emissions. Where an oil flowmeter records 
    volumetric flow, use the calculation procedures in section 3.2 of 
    this appendix to calculate mass flow of oil. Calculate hourly 
    SO2 mass emissions from gaseous fuel using the procedures in 
    section 3.3 of this appendix. Calculate hourly heat input for oil 
    and for gaseous fuel using the equations in section 5.5 of Appendix 
    F of this part. Calculate total SO2 mass emissions and heat 
    input as provided under section 3.4 of this appendix.
    
    3.1 SO2 Mass Emissions Calculation for Oil
    
        3.1.1 * * *
    Where:
    
    MSO2=Hourly mass of SO2 emitted from combustion of oil, 
    lb/hr.
    * * * * *
        3.1.2  Record the SO2 mass emissions from oil for each hour 
    that oil is combusted.
    
    3.2  Mass Flow Calculation for Oil Using Volumetric Flow
    
        3.2.1  Where the oil flowmeter records volumetric flow rather 
    than mass flow, calculate and record the oil mass flow for each 
    hourly period using hourly oil flow measurements and the density or 
    specific gravity of the oil sample.
    * * * * *
    
    3.3  SO2 Mass Emissions Calculation for Gaseous Fuels
    
        3.3.1  Use the following equation to calculate the SO2 
    emissions using the gas sampling and analysis procedures in section 
    2.3.1 of this appendix:
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.011
    
    
    Where:
    
    MSO2g=Hourly mass of SO2 emitted due to combustion of 
    gaseous fuel, lb/hr.
    Qg=Hourly metered flow or amount of gaseous fuel combusted, 100 
    scf/hr.
    Sg=Sulfur content of gaseous fuel, in grain/100 scf.
    2.0=Ratio of lb SO2/lb S.
    7000=Conversion of grains/100 scf to lb/100 scf.
    
        3.3.2  Use the following equation to calculate the SO2 
    emissions using the 0.0006 lb/mmBtu emission rate in section 2.3.2 
    of this appendix:
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.012
    
    
    Where:
    
    MSO2g=Hourly mass of SO2 emissions from combustion of 
    pipeline natural gas, lb/hr.
    ER=SO2 emission rate of 0.0006 lb/mmBtu for pipeline natural 
    gas.
    HIg=Hourly heat input of pipeline natural gas, calculated using 
    procedures in appendix F of this part, in mmBtu/hr.
    
        3.3.3  Record the SO2 mass emissions for each hour when the 
    unit combusts gaseous fuel.
    
    3.4  Records and Reports
    
        Calculate and record quarterly and cumulative SO2 mass 
    emissions and heat input for each calendar quarter and for the 
    calendar year by summing the hourly values. Calculate and record 
    SO2 emissions and heat input data using a data acquisition and 
    handling system. Report these data in a standard electronic format 
    specified by the Administrator.
    * * * * *
    
    Appendix E to Part 75--Optional NOX Emissions Estimation Protocol 
    for Gas-Fired Peaking Units and Oil-Fired Peaking Units
    
        65.  Appendix E to part 75, section 1 is amended by revising 
    section 1.1; by removing section 1.2, redesignating sections 1.3, 1.3.1 
    and 1.3.2 as sections 1.2, 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 and revising new sections 
    1.2, 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 to read as follows:
    
    1.  Applicability
    
    1.1  Unit Operation Requirements
    
        This NOX emissions estimation procedure may be used in lieu 
    of a continuous NOX emission monitoring system (lb/mmBtu) for 
    determining the average NOX emission rate and hourly NOX 
    rate from gas-fired peaking units and oil-fired peaking units as 
    defined in Sec. 72.2 of this chapter. If a unit's operations exceed 
    the levels required to be a peaking unit, install and certify a 
    continuous NOX emission monitoring system no later than 
    December 31 of the following calendar year. The provisions of 
    Sec. 75.12 apply to excepted monitoring systems under this appendix.
    
    1.2  Certification
    
        1.2.1  Pursuant to the procedures in Sec. 75.20, complete all 
    testing requirements to certify use of this protocol in lieu of a 
    NOX continuous emission monitoring system no later than the 
    applicable deadline specified in Sec. 75.4. Apply to the 
    Administrator for certification to use this method no later than 45 
    days after the completion of all certification testing. Whenever the 
    monitoring method is to be changed, reapply to the Administrator for 
    certification of the new monitoring method.
        1.2.2  If the owner or operator has already successfully 
    completed certification testing of the unit using the protocol of 
    appendix E of part 75 and submitted a certification application 
    under Sec. 75.20(g) prior to ________ July 17, 1995, the unit's 
    monitoring system does not need to repeat initial certification 
    testing using the revised procedures published ________ May 17, 
    1995.
    * * * * *
        66. Appendix E to part 75, section 2 is amended by revising 
    sections 2.1, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.2.1, and 2.1.2.2; by removing section 
    2.1.2.3 and redesignating section 2.1.2.4 as 2.1.2.3; by revising 
    sections 2.1.3, 2.1.3.1, and 2.1.3.2; by revising sections 2.1.4, 
    2.1.5, 2.1.6, 2.1.6.1, and 2.1.6.2; by revising sections 2.3, 2.3.1 and 
    2.3.2; by removing sections 2.1.4.1, 2.1.4.2, 2.1.4.3, 2.1.4.4, 2.3.3, 
    2.3.3.1 and 2.3.3.3; by redesignating section 2.3.3.2 as section 2.3.3 
    and revising new section 2.3.3; by revising section 2.4.1; by revising 
    section 2.4.2 and adding sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.4; by revising section 
    2.5 and adding sections 2.5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 2.5.4, and 2.5.5 to read 
    as follows:
    2. Procedure
    
    2.1  Initial Performance Testing
    
        Use the following procedures for: measuring NOX emission 
    rates at heat input rate levels corresponding to different load 
    levels; measuring heat input rate; and plotting the correlation 
    between heat input rate and NOX emission rate, in order to 
    determine the emission rate of the unit(s).
    
    2.1.1  Load Selection
    
        Establish at least four approximately equally spaced operating 
    load points, ranging from the maximum operating load to the minimum 
    operating load. Select the maximum and minimum operating load from 
    the operating history of the unit during the most recent two years. 
    (If projections indicate that the unit's maximum or minimum 
    operating load during the next five years will be significantly 
    different from the most recent two years, select the maximum and 
    minimum operating load based on the projected dispatched load of the 
    unit.) For new gas-fired peaking units or new oil-fired peaking 
    units, select the maximum and minimum operating load from the 
    expected maximum and minimum load to be dispatched to the unit in 
    the first five calendar years of operation.
    
    2.1.2  NOX and O2 Concentration Measurements
    
        Use the following procedures to measure NOX and O2 
    concentration in order to determine NOX emission rate.
        2.1.2.1  For boilers, select an excess O2 level for each 
    fuel (and, optionally, for each combination of fuels) to be 
    combusted that is representative for each of the four or more load 
    levels. If a boiler operates using a single, consistent combination 
    of fuels only, the testing may be performed using the combination 
    rather than each fuel. If a fuel is combusted only for the purpose 
    of testing ignition of the burners for a period of five minutes or 
    less per ignition test or for start-up, then the boiler NOX 
    emission rate does not need to be tested separately for that fuel. 
    Operate the boiler at a normal or conservatively high excess oxygen 
    level in [[Page 26552]] conjunction with these tests. Measure the 
    NOX and O2 at each load point for each fuel or consistent 
    fuel combination (and, optionally, for each combination of fuels) to 
    be combusted. Measure the NOX and O2 concentrations 
    according to Method 7E and 3A in appendix A of part 60 of this 
    chapter. Select sampling points as specified in section 5.1, Method 
    3 in appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The designated 
    representative for the unit may also petition the Administrator 
    under Sec. 75.66 to use fewer sampling points. Such a petition shall 
    include the proposed alternative sampling procedure and information 
    demonstrating that there is no concentration stratification at the 
    sampling location.
        2.1.2.2  For stationary gas turbines, select sampling points and 
    measure the NOX and O2 concentrations at each load point 
    for each fuel or consistent combination of fuels (and, optionally, 
    each combination of fuels) according to appendix A, Method 20 of 
    part 60 of this chapter. For diesel or dual fuel reciprocating 
    engines, measure the NOX and O2 concentrations according 
    to Method 20, but modify Method 20 by selecting a sampling site to 
    be as close as practical to the exhaust of the engine.
        2.1.2.3  Allow the unit to stabilize for a minimum of 15 minutes 
    (or longer if needed for the NOX and O2 readings to 
    stabilize) prior to commencing NOx, O2, and heat input 
    measurements. Determine the average measurement system response time 
    according to section 5.5 of Method 20 in appendix A, part 60 of this 
    chapter. When inserting the probe into the flue gas for the first 
    sampling point in each traverse, sample for at least one minute plus 
    twice the average measurement system response time (or longer, if 
    necessary to obtain a stable reading). For all other sampling points 
    in each traverse, sample for at least one minute plus the average 
    measurement response time (or longer, if necessary to obtain a 
    stable reading). Perform three test runs at each load condition and 
    obtain an arithmetic average of the runs for each load condition. 
    During each test run on a boiler, record the boiler excess oxygen 
    level at 5 minute intervals.
    
    2.1.3  Heat Input
    
        Measure the total heat input (mmBtu) and heat input rate during 
    testing (mmBtu/hr) as follows:
        2.1.3.1  When the unit is combusting fuel, measure and record 
    the flow of fuel consumed. Measure the flow of fuel with an in-line 
    flowmeter(s) and automatically record the data. If a portion of the 
    flow is diverted from the unit without being burned, and that 
    diversion occurs downstream of the fuel flowmeter, an in-line 
    flowmeter is required to account for the unburned fuel. Install and 
    calibrate in-line flow meters using the procedures and 
    specifications contained in sections 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, and 2.1.5 
    of appendix D of this part. Correct any gaseous fuel flow rate 
    measured at actual temperature and pressure to standard conditions 
    of 68 deg.F and 29.92 inches of mercury.
        2.1.3.2  For liquid fuels, analyze fuel samples taken according 
    to the requirements of section 2.2 of appendix D of this part to 
    determine the heat content of the fuel. Determine heat content of 
    liquid or gaseous fuel in accordance with the procedures in appendix 
    F of this part. Calculate the heat input rate during testing (mmBtu/
    hr) associated with each load condition in accordance with Equations 
    F-19 or F-20 in appendix F of this part and total heat input using 
    Equation E-1 of this appendix. Record the heat input rate at each 
    heat input/load point.
    
    2.1.4  Emergency Fuel
    
        The designated representative of a unit that is restricted by 
    its Federal, State or local permit to combusting a particular fuel 
    only during emergencies where the primary fuel is not available may 
    petition the Administrator pursuant to the procedures in Sec. 75.66 
    for an exemption from the requirements of this appendix for testing 
    the NOX emission rate during combustion of the emergency fuel. 
    The designated representative shall include in the petition a 
    procedure for determining the NOX emission rate for the unit 
    when the emergency fuel is combusted, and a demonstration that the 
    permit restricts use of the fuel to emergencies only. The designated 
    representative shall also provide notice under Sec. 75.61(a) for 
    each period when the emergency fuel is combusted.
    
    2.1.5  Tabulation of Results
    
        Tabulate the results of each baseline correlation test for each 
    fuel or, as applicable, combination of fuels, listing: time of test, 
    duration, operating loads, heat input rate (mmBtu/hr), F-factors, 
    excess oxygen levels, and NOX concentrations (ppm) on a dry 
    basis (at actual excess oxygen level). Convert the NOX 
    concentrations (ppm) to NOX emission rates (to the nearest 0.01 
    lb/mm/Btu) according to Equation F-5 of appendix F of this part or 
    19-3 in Method 19 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter, as 
    appropriate. Calculate the NOX emission rate in lb/mmBtu for 
    each sampling point and determine the arithmetic average NOX 
    emission rate of each test run. Calculate the arithmetic average of 
    the boiler excess oxygen readings for each test run. Record the 
    arithmetic average of the three test runs as the NOX emission 
    rate and the boiler excess oxygen level for the heat input/load 
    condition.
    
    2.1.6  Plotting of Results
    
        Plot the tabulated results as an x-y graph for each fuel and (as 
    applicable) combination of fuels combusted according to the 
    following procedures.
        2.1.6.1  Plot the heat input rate (mmBtu/hr) as the independent 
    (or x) variable and the NOX emission rates (lb/mmBtu) as the 
    dependent (or y) variable for each load point. Construct the graph 
    by drawing straight line segments between each load point. Draw a 
    horizontal line to the y-axis from the minimum heat input (load) 
    point.
        2.1.6.2  Units that co-fire gas and oil may be tested while 
    firing gas only and oil only instead of testing with each 
    combination of fuels. In this case, construct a graph for each fuel.
        2.2  * * *
    
    2.3  Other Quality Assurance/Quality Control-Related NOx Emission 
    Rate Testing
    
        When the operating levels of certain parameters exceed the 
    limits specified below, or where the Administrator issues a notice 
    requesting retesting because the NOX emission rate data 
    availability for when the unit operates within all quality 
    assurance/quality control parameters in this section since the last 
    test is less than 90.0 percent, as calculated by the Administrator, 
    complete retesting of the NOX emission rate by the earlier of: 
    (1) 10 unit operating days (as defined in section 2.1 of appendix B 
    of this part) or (2) 180 calendar days after exceeding the limits or 
    after the date of issuance of a notice from the Administrator to re-
    verify the unit's NOX emission rate. Submit test results in 
    accordance with Sec. 75.60(a) within 45 days of completing the 
    retesting.
        2.3.1  For a stationary gas turbine, obtain a list of at least 
    four operating parameters indicative of the turbine's NOX 
    formation characteristics, and the recommended ranges for these 
    parameters at each tested load-heat input point, from the gas 
    turbine manufacturer. If the gas turbine uses water or steam 
    injection for NOX control, the water/fuel or steam/fuel ratio 
    shall be one of these parameters. During the NOx-heat input 
    correlation tests, record the average value of each parameter for 
    each load-heat input to ensure that the parameters are within the 
    manufacturer's recommended range. Redetermine the NOX emission 
    rate-heat input correlation for each fuel and (optional) combination 
    of fuels after continuously exceeding the manufacturer's recommended 
    range of any of these parameters for one or more successive 
    operating periods totaling more than 16 unit operating hours.
        2.3.2  For a diesel or dual-fuel reciprocating engine, obtain a 
    list of at least four operating parameters indicative of the 
    engine's NOX formation characteristics, and the recommended 
    ranges for these parameters at each tested load-heat input point, 
    from the engine manufacturer. Any operating parameter critical for 
    NOX control shall be included. During the NOX heat-input 
    correlation tests, record the average value of each parameter for 
    each load-heat input to ensure that the parameters are within the 
    manufacturer's recommended range. Redetermine the NOX emission 
    rate-heat input correlation for each fuel and (optional) combination 
    or fuels after continuously exceeding the manufacturer's recommended 
    range of any of these parameters for one or more successive 
    operating periods totaling more than 16 unit operating hours.
        2.3.3  For boilers using the procedures in this appendix, the 
    NOX emission rate heat input correlation for each fuel and 
    (optional) combination of fuels shall be redetermined if the excess 
    oxygen level at any heat input rate (or unit operating load) 
    continuously exceeds by more than 2 percentage points O2 from 
    the boiler excess oxygen level recorded at the same operating heat 
    input rate during the previous NOX emission rate test for one 
    or more successive operating periods totaling more than 16 unit 
    operating hours.
    
    2.4  Procedures for Determining Hourly NOX Emission Rate
    
        2.4.1  Record the time (hr. and min.), load (MWge or steam load 
    in 1000 lb/hr), fuel flow rate and heat input rate (using the 
    procedures in section 2.1.3 of this appendix) for each 
    [[Page 26553]] hour during which the unit combusts fuel. Calculate 
    the total hourly heat input using Equation E-1 of this appendix. 
    Record the heat input rate for each fuel to the nearest 0.1 mmBtu/
    hr. During partial unit operating hours or during hours where more 
    than one fuel is combusted, heat input must be represented as an 
    hourly rate in mmBtu/hr, as if the fuel were combusted for the 
    entire hour at that rate (and not as the actual, total heat input 
    during that partial hour or hour) in order to ensure proper 
    correlation with the NOX emission rate graph.
        2.4.2  Use the graph of the baseline correlation results 
    (appropriate for the fuel or fuel combination) to determine the 
    NOX emissions rate (lb/mmBtu) corresponding to the heat input 
    rate (mmBtu/hr). Input this correlation into the data acquisition 
    and handling system for the unit. Linearly interpolate to 0.1 mmBtu/
    hr heat input rate and 0.01 lb/mmBtu NOX.
        2.4.3  To determine the NOX emission rate for a unit co-
    firing fuels that has not been tested for that combination of fuels, 
    interpolate between the NOX emission rate for each fuel as 
    follows. Determine the heat input rate for the hour (in mmBtu/hr) 
    for each fuel and select the corresponding NOX emission rate 
    for each fuel on the appropriate graph. (When a fuel is combusted 
    for a partial hour, determine the fuel usage time for each fuel and 
    determine the heat input rate from each fuel as if that fuel were 
    combusted at that rate for the entire hour in order to select the 
    corresponding NOX emission rate.) Calculate the total heat 
    input to the unit in mmBtu for the hour from all fuel combusted 
    using Equation E-1. Calculate a Btu-weighted average of the emission 
    rates for all fuels using Equation E-2 of this appendix.
        2.4.4  For each hour, record the critical quality assurance 
    parameters, as identified in the monitoring plan, and as required by 
    section 2.3 of this appendix.
    
    2.5  Missing Data Procedures
    
        Provide substitute data for each unit electing to use this 
    alternative procedure whenever a valid quality-assured hour of 
    NOX emission rate data has not been obtained according to the 
    procedures and specifications of this appendix.
        2.5.1  Use the procedures of this section whenever any of the 
    quality assurance/quality control parameters exceeds the limits in 
    section 2.3 of this appendix or whenever any of the quality 
    assurance/quality control parameters are not available.
        2.5.2  Substitute missing NOX emission rate data using the 
    highest NOX emission rate tabulated during the most recent set 
    of baseline correlation tests for the same fuel or, if applicable, 
    combination of fuels.
        2.5.3  Maintain a record indicating which data are substitute 
    data and the reasons for the failure to provide a valid quality-
    assured hour of NOX emission rate data according to the 
    procedures and specifications of this appendix.
        2.5.4  Substitute missing data from a fuel flowmeter using the 
    procedures in section 2.4.3 of appendix D of this part.
        2.5.5  Substitute missing data for gross calorific value of fuel 
    using the procedures in section 2.4.2 of appendix D of this part.
    * * * * *
        67. Appendix E to part 75, section 3 is amended by revising section 
    3.1; by removing section 3.2, redesignating section 3.3 as 3.2, and 
    revising new section 3.2; by redesignating sections 3.4, 3.4.1, 3.4.2, 
    3.4.3 as 3.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, and 3.3.3; and by removing sections 3.4.4 
    and 3.5 and adding section 3.3.4 to read as follows:
    
    3. Calculations
    
    3.1  Heat Input
    
        Calculate the total heat input by summing the product of heat 
    input rate and fuel usage time of each fuel, as in the following 
    equation:
    
    HT = HIfuel1 t1 + HIfuel2 t2 + HIfuel3 
    t3 + . . . + HIlastfuel tlast    (Eq. E-1)
    Where:
    
    HT=Total heat input of fuel flow or a combination of fuel flows 
    to a unit, mmBtu;
    HIfuel 1,2,3,...last=Heat input rate from each fuel during fuel 
    usage time, in mmBtu/hr, as determined using equation F-19 or F-20 
    in section 5.5 of appendix F of this part, mmBtu/hr;
    t1,2,3....last=Fuel usage time for each fuel, rounded up to the 
    nearest .25 hours.
    
        Note: For hours where a fuel is combusted for only part of the 
    hour, use the fuel flow rate or mass flow rate during the fuel usage 
    time, instead of the total fuel flow during the hour, when 
    calculating heat input rate using Equation F-19 or F-20.
    
    3.2  F-factors
        Determine the F-factors for each fuel or combination of fuels to 
    be combusted according to section 3.3 of appendix F of this part.
    
    3.3  NOX Emission Rate
    
    3.3.1  Conversion from Concentration to Emission Rate [Amended]
    
        Convert the NOX concentrations (ppm) and O2 
    concentrations to NOX emission rates (to the nearest 0.01 lb/
    mmBtu) according to the appropriate one of the following equations: 
    F-5 in appendix F of this part for dry basis concentration 
    measurements, or 19-3 in Method 19 of appendix A of part 60 of this 
    chapter for wet basis concentration measurements.
    
    3.3.2  Quarterly Average NOX Emission Rate
    
        Report the quarterly average emission rate (lb/mmBtu) as 
    required in subpart G of this part. Calculate the quarterly average 
    NOX emission rate according to Equation F-9 in Appendix F of 
    this part.
    
    3.3.3  Annual Average NOX Emission Rate
    
        Report the average emission rate (lb/mmBtu) for the calendar 
    year as required in subpart G of this part. Calculate the average 
    NOX emission rate according to equation F-10 in appendix F of 
    this part.
        3.3.4  Average NOX Emission Rate During Co-firing of Fuels 
    [Amended]    (Eq. E-2)
    Where:
    
    Eh=NOX emission rate for the unit for the hour, lb/mmBtu;
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.013
    
    
    Ef=NOX emission rate for the unit for a given fuel at heat 
    input rate HIf, lb/mmBtu;
    HIf=Heat input rate for a given fuel during the fuel usage 
    time, as determined using equation F-19 or F-20 in section 5.5 of 
    appendix F of this part, mmBtu/hr;
    HT=Total heat input for all fuels for the hour from Equation E-
    1;
    tt=Fuel usage time for each fuel, rounded to the nearest .25 
    hour.
    
        Note: For hours where a fuel is combusted for only part of the 
    hour, use the fuel flow rate or mass flow rate during the fuel usage 
    time, instead of the total fuel flow or mass flow during the hour, 
    when calculating heat input rate using Equation F-19 or F-20.
    * * * * *
        68. Appendix E to part 75, section 4 is amended by revising the 
    introductory paragraph and section 4.1 to read as follows:
    
    4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan
    
        Include a section on the NOX emission rate determination as 
    part of the monitoring quality assurance/quality control plan 
    required under Sec. 75.21 and appendix B of this part for each gas-
    fired peaking unit and each oil-fired peaking unit. In this section 
    present information including, but not limited to, the following: 
    (1) a copy of all data and results from the initial NOX 
    emission rate testing, including the values of quality assurance 
    parameters specified in Section 2.3 of this appendix; (2) a copy of 
    all data and results from the most recent NOX emission rate 
    load correlation testing; (3) a copy of the unit manufacturer's 
    recommended range of quality assurance- and quality control-related 
    operating parameters.
        4.1  Submit a copy of the unit manufacturer's recommended range 
    of operating parameter values, and the range of operating parameter 
    values recorded during the previous NOX emission rate test that 
    determined the unit's NOX emission rate, along with the unit's 
    revised monitoring plan submitted with the certification 
    application.
    * * * * *
    
    Appendix F to Part 75--Conversion Procedures
    
        69. Appendix F to part 75, section 2 is amended by revising section 
    2.4 to read as follows:
    * * * * *
    
    2. Procedures for SO2 Emissions
    
    * * * * *
        2.4  Round all SO2 mass emissions to the number of decimal 
    places identified in Sec. 75.50(c) or Sec. 75.54(c) of this part (in 
    lb/hr).
    * * * * *
        70. Appendix F to part 75, section 3 is amended by revising the 
    equation in section 3.2, by adding a sentence to the end of 3.3.4. 
    and by revising sections 3.3.6.1, 3.3.6.2, and 3.4 to read as 
    follows: [[Page 26554]] 
    
    3. Procedures for NOX Emission Rate
    
    * * * * *
        3.2  When the NOX continuous emission monitoring system 
    uses CO2 as the diluent, use the following conversion 
    procedure:
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.014
    
    
    where:
    
    K, E, Ch, Fc, and %CO2 are defined in section 3.3 of this 
    appendix.
    Where CO2 and NOX measurements are performed on a 
    different moisture basis, use the equations in Method 19 in Appendix 
    A of part 60 of this chapter.
    * * * * *
        3.3.4  * * * A minimum concentration of 5.0 percent CO2 and 
    a maximum concentration of 14.0 percent O2 may be substituted 
    for measured diluent gas concentration values during unit start-up.
        3.3.5  * * *
        3.3.6  * * *
        3.3.6.1  H, C, S, N, and O are content by weight of hydrogen, 
    carbon, sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen (expressed as percent), 
    respectively, as determined on the same basis as the gross calorific 
    value (GCV) by ultimate analysis of the fuel combusted using ASTM 
    D3176-89, ``Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal and 
    Coke'' (solid fuels), ASTM D5291-92, ``Standard Test Methods for 
    Instrumental Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen in 
    Petroleum Products and Lubricants'' (liquid fuels) or computed from 
    results using ASTM D1945-91, ``Standard Test Method for Analysis of 
    Natural Gas by Gas Chromatography'' or ASTM D1946-90, ``Standard 
    Practice for Analysis of Reformed Gas by Gas Chromatography'' 
    (gaseous fuels) as applicable. (These methods are incorporated by 
    reference under Sec. 75.6 of this part.)
        3.3.6.2  GCV is the gross calorific value (Btu/lb) of the fuel 
    combusted determined by ASTM D2015-91, ``Standard Test Method for 
    Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Adiabatic Bomb 
    Calorimeter'', ASTM D1989-92 ``Standard Test Method for Gross 
    Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by Microprocessor Controlled 
    Isoperibol Calorimeters,'' or ASTM D3286-91a ``Standard Test Method 
    for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by the Isoperibol Bomb 
    Calorimeter'' for solid and liquid fuels, and ASTM D240-87 
    (Reapproved 1991) ``Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of 
    Liquid Hydrocarbon Fuels by Bomb Calorimeter'', or ASTM D2382-88 
    ``Standard Test Method for Heat of Combustion of Hydrocarbon Fuels 
    by Bomb Calorimeter (High-Precision Method)'' for oil; and ASTM 
    D3588-91 ``Standard Practice for Calculating Heat Value, 
    Compressibility Factor, and Relative Density (Specific Gravity) of 
    Gaseous Fuels,'' ASTM D4891-89 ``Standard Test Method for Heating 
    Value of Gases in Natural Gas Range by Stoichiometric Combustion,'' 
    GPA Standard 2172 86 ``Calculation of Gross Heating Value, Relative 
    Density and Compressibility Factor for Natural Gas Mixtures from 
    Compositional Analysis,'' GPA Standard 2261-90 ``Analysis for 
    Natural Gas and Similar Gaseous Mixtures by Gas Chromatography,'' or 
    ASTM D1826-88, ``Standard Test Method for Calorific (Heating) Value 
    of Gases in Natural Gas Range by Continuous Recording Calorimeter'' 
    for gaseous fuels, as applicable. (These methods are incorporated by 
    reference under Sec. 75.6).
        3.3.6.3  * * *
        3.3.6.4  * * *
        3.4 Use the following equations to calculate the average 
    NOX emission rate for each calendar quarter (Eq. F-9) and the 
    average emission rate for the calendar year (Eq. F-10) in lb/mmBtu.
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.015
    
    
    where:
    
    Eq=Quarterly average NOX emission rate, lb/mmBtu.
    Ei=Hourly average Nox emission rate, lb/mmBtu.
    n=Number of hourly rates during calendar quarter.
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.016
    
    
    where:
    
    Ea=Average NOX emission rate for the calendar year, lb/
    mmBtu.
    Ei=Hourly average NOX emission rate, lb/mmBtu.
    m=Number of hours for which Ei is available in the calendar 
    year.
        3.5  * * *
    * * * * *
        71. Appendix F to part 75, section 4 is amended by revising the 
    introductory paragraph, by revising the definition of the variable 
    ``Ch'' in Equation F-11 in section 4.1, by revising sections 4.4.1 
    and 4.4.2. and by adding two sentences to the beginning of sections 
    4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3, and 4.4.3 to read as follows:
    
    4. Procedures for CO2 Mass Emissions
    
        Use the following procedures to convert continuous emission 
    monitoring system measurements of CO2 concentration 
    (percentage) and volumetric flow rate (scfh) into CO2 mass 
    emissions (in tons/day) when the owner or operator uses a CO2 
    continuous emission monitoring system (consisting of a CO2 or 
    O2 pollutant monitor) and a flow monitoring system to monitor 
    CO2 emissions from an affected unit.
        4.1  * * *
    (Eq. F-11)
    
    Where:
    * * * * *
    Ch=Hourly average CO2 concentration, stack moisture basis, 
    %CO2. A minimum concentration of 5.0 percent CO2 may be 
    substituted for the measured concentration during unit start-up.
    * * * * *
        4.2  * * *
        4.3  * * *
        4.3.1  On or after January 1, 1996, use the missing data 
    provisions of Sec. 75.35 and do not use the provisions of this 
    section. Prior to January 1, 1996, use either the provisions of this 
    section or the provisions of Sec. 75.35. * * *
        4.3.2  On or after January 1, 1996, use the missing data 
    provisions of Sec. 75.35 and do not use the provisions of this 
    section. Prior to January 1, 1996, use either the provisions of this 
    section or the provisions of Sec. 75.35. * * *
        4.3.3  On or after January 1, 1996, use the missing data 
    provisions of Sec. 75.35 and do not use the provisions of this 
    section. Prior to January 1, 1996, use either the provisions of this 
    section or the provisions of Sec. 75.35. * * *
        4.4  For an affected unit, when the owner or operator is 
    continuously monitoring O2 concentration (in percent by volume) 
    of flue gases using an O2 monitor, use the equations and 
    procedures in section 4.4.1 through 4.4.3 of this appendix to 
    determine hourly CO2 mass emissions (in tons).
        4.4.1  Use appropriate F and Fc factors from section 3.3.5 
    of this appendix in the following equation to determine hourly 
    average CO2 concentration of flue gases (in percent by volume).
    
    [[Page 26555]]
    
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.017
    
    
    (Eq. F-14a)
    Where:
    
    CO2d=Hourly average CO2 concentration, percent by volume, 
    dry basis.
    F, Fc=F-factor or carbon-based Fc-factor from section 3.3.5 of 
    this appendix.
    20.9=Percentage of O2 in ambient air.
    O2d=Hourly average O2 concentration, percent by volume, 
    dry basis. A maximum concentration of 14.0 percent O2 may be 
    substituted for the measured concentration during unit start-up.
    or
    
    (Eq. F-14b)
    
    Where:
    
    CO2w=Hourly average CO2 concentration, percent by volume, 
    wet basis.
    O2w=Hourly average O2 concentration, percent by volume, 
    wet basis. A maximum concentration of 14.0 percent O2 may be 
    substituted for the measured concentration during unit start-up.
    F, Fc=F-factor or carbon-based Fc-factor from section 
    3.3.5 of this appendix.
    20.9=Percentage of O2 in ambient air.
    %H2O=Moisture content of gas in the stack, percent.
    
        4.4.2  Determine CO2 mass emissions (in tons) from hourly 
    average CO2 concentration (percent by volume) using Equation F-
    11 and the procedure in section 4.1, where O2 measurements are 
    on a wet basis, or using the procedures in section 4.2 of this 
    appendix, where O2 measurements are on a dry basis.
        4.4.3  On or after January 1, 1996, use the missing data 
    provisions of Sec. 75.35 and do not use the provisions of this 
    section. Prior to January 1, 1996, either use the provisions of 
    Sec. 75.35 or use the provisions of this section. * * *
    * * * * *
        72. Appendix F to part 75, section 5 is amended by revising section 
    5.1 and by revising the definition of the variable ``%CO2w'' in 
    Equation F-15 in section 5.2.1, by revising the definition of the 
    variable ``%CO2d'' in Equation F-16 in section 5.2.2, by revising 
    the definition of the variable ``%O2w'' in Equation F-17 in 
    section 5.2.3, and by revising the definition of the variable 
    ``%O2d'' in Equation F-18 in section 5.2.4, by revising seciton 
    5.5.1, by adding two sentences to the beginning of sections 5.3, and 
    5.4; by revising section 5.5; by revising section 5.5.2; by revising 
    section 5.5.3.1; by revising section 5.5.3.2;by revising section 
    5.5.3.3; and by adding new sections 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 5.5.6, and 5.5.7 to 
    read as follows:
    
    5. Procedures for Heat Input
    
    * * * * *
        5.1  Calculate and record heat input to an affected unit on an 
    hourly basis, except as provided below. The owner or operator may 
    choose to use the provisions specified in Sec. 75.16(e) or in 
    section 2.1.2 of appendix D of this part in conjunction with the 
    procedures provided below to apportion heat input among each unit 
    using the common stack or common pipe header.
        5.2  * * *
        5.2.1  * * *
    (Eq. F-15)
    
    Where:
    
    %CO2w=Hourly concentration of CO2, percent CO2 wet 
    basis. A minimum concentration of 5.0 percent CO2 may be 
    substituted for the measured concentration during unit startup.
        5.2.2  * * *
    (Eq. F-16)
    
    Where:
    
    %CO2d=Hourly concentration of CO2, percent CO2 dry 
    basis. A minimum concentration of 5.0 percent CO2 may be 
    substituted for the measured concentration during unit startup.
    * * * * *
        5.2.3  * * *
    (Eq. F-17)
    Where:
    
    %O2w=Hourly concentration of O2, percent O2 wet 
    basis. A maximum concentration of 14.0 percent O2 may be 
    substituted for the measured concentration during unit startup.
    * * * * *
        5.2.4  * * *
    (Eq. F-18)
    
    Where:
    %O2d=Hourly concentration of O2, percent O2 dry 
    basis. A maximum concentration of 14.0 percent O2 may be 
    substituted for the measured concentration during unit startup.
    * * * * *
        5.3  On or after January 1, 1996, use the missing data 
    provisions of Sec. 75.36 and do not use the provisions of this 
    section. Prior to January 1, 1996, use either the missing data 
    provisions of this section or the provisions of Sec. 75.36. * * *
        5.4 On or after January 1, 1996, use the missing data provisions 
    of Sec. 75.36 and do not use the provisions of this section. Prior 
    to January 1, 1996, use either the missing data provisions of this 
    section or the provisions of Sec. 75.36. * * *
        5.5  For a gas-fired or oil-fired unit that does not have a flow 
    monitor and is using the procedures specified in appendix D to this 
    part to monitor SO2 emissions or for any affected unit using a 
    common stack for which the owner or operator chooses to determine 
    heat input by fuel sampling and analysis, use the following 
    procedures to calculate hourly heat input in mmBtu/hr.
        5.5.1  When the unit is combusting oil, use the following 
    equation to calculate hourly heat input.
    
    (Eq. F-19)
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.018
    
    
    Where:
    
    HIo=Hourly heat input from oil, mmBtu/hr.
    Mo=Mass of oil consumed per hour, as determined using procedures in 
    appendix D of this part, in lb, tons, or kg.
    GCVo=Gross calorific value of oil, as measured daily by ASTM D240-87 
    (Reapproved 1991), ASTM D2015-91, or ASTM D2382-88, Btu/unit mass 
    (incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6 of this part).
        106=Conversion of Btu to mmBtu.
    
        When performing oil sampling and analysis solely for the purpose 
    of the missing data procedures in Sec. 75.36, oil samples for 
    measuring GCV may be taken weekly and the procedures specified in 
    appendix D of this part for determining the mass of oil consumed per 
    hour are optional.
        5.5.2  When the unit is combusting gaseous fuels, use the 
    following equation to calculate heat input from gaseous fuels for 
    each hour.
    
    (Eq. F-20)
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.019
    
    
    Where:
    HIg=Hourly heat input from gaseous fuel, mmBtu/hour.
    Qg=Metered flow or amount of gaseous fuel combusted during the 
    hour, hundred cubic feet.
    GCVg=Gross calorific value of gaseous fuel, as determined by 
    sampling at least every month the gaseous fuel is combusted, or as 
    verified by the contractual supplier at least once every month the 
    gaseous fuel is combusted using ASTM D1826-88, ASTM D3588-91, ASTM 
    D4891-89, GPA Standard 2172-86 ``Calculation of Gross Heating Value, 
    Relative Density and Compressibility Factor for Natural Gas Mixtures 
    from Compositional Analysis,'' or GPA Standard 2261-90 ``Analysis 
    for Natural Gas and Similar Gaseous Mixtures by Gas 
    Chromatography,'' Btu/cubic foot (incorporated by reference under 
    Sec. 75.6 of this part).
    10,000=Conversion factor, (Btu-100 scf)/(mmBtu-scf).
        5.5.3  * * *
        5.5.3.1  Perform coal sampling daily according to section 
    5.3.2.2 in Method 19 in appendix A to part 60 of this chapter and 
    use [[Page 26556]] ASTM Method D2234-89, ``Standard Test Methods for 
    Collection of a Gross Sample of Coal,'' (incorporated by reference 
    under Sec. 75.6) Type I, Conditions A, B, or C and systematic 
    spacing for sampling. (When performing coal sampling solely for the 
    purposes of the missing data procedures in Sec. 75.36, use of ASTM 
    D2234-89 is optional, and coal samples may be taken weekly.)
        5.5.3.2  Use ASTM D2013-86, ``Standard Method of Preparing Coal 
    Samples for Analysis,'' for preparation of a daily coal sample and 
    analyze each daily coal sample for gross calorific value using ASTM 
    D2015-91, ``Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal 
    and Coke by the Adiabatic Bomb Calorimeter'', ASTM 1989-92 
    ``Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and Coke by 
    Microprocessor Controlled Isoperibol Calorimeters,'' or ASTM 3286-
    91a ``Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and 
    Coke by the Isoperibol Bomb Calorimeter.'' (All ASTM methods are 
    incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6 of this part.)
        On-line coal analysis may also be used if the on-line analytical 
    instrument has been demonstrated to be equivalent to the applicable 
    ASTM methods under Secs. 75.23 and 75.66.
        5.5.3.3  Calculate the heat input from coal using the following 
    equation:
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.020
    
    
    (Eq. F-21)
    Where:
    
    HIc=Daily heat input from coal, mmBtu/day.
    Mc=Mass of coal consumed per day, as measured and recorded in 
    company records, tons.
    GCVc=Gross calorific value of coal sample, as measured by ASTM 
    D3176-89, D1989-92, D3286-91a, or D2015-91, Btu/lb.
    500=Conversion of Btu/lb to mmBtu/ton.
    
        5.5.4  For units obtaining heat input values daily instead of 
    hourly, apportion the daily heat input using the fraction of the 
    daily steam load or daily unit operating load used each hour in 
    order to obtain HIi for use in the above equations. 
    Alternatively, use the hourly mass of coal consumed in equation F-
    21.
        5.5.5  If a daily fuel sampling value for gross calorific value 
    is not available, substitute the maximum gross calorific value 
    measured from the previous 30 daily samples. If a monthly fuel 
    sampling value for gross calorific value is not available, 
    substitute the maximum gross calorific value measured from the 
    previous 3 monthly samples.
        5.5.6  If a fuel flow value is not available, use the fuel 
    flowmeter missing data procedures in section 2.4 of appendix D of 
    this part. If a daily coal consumption value is not available, 
    substitute the maximum fuel feed rate during the previous thirty 
    days when the unit burned coal.
        5.5.7  Results for samples must be available no later than 
    thirty calendar days after the sample is composited or taken. 
    However, during an audit, the Administrator may require that the 
    results be available in five business days, or sooner if 
    practicable.
    * * * * *
        73. Appendix F to part 75, section 6 is amended by revising the 
    definitions for Equation F-22 to read as follows:
    
    6. Procedure for Converting Volumetric Flow to STP
    
    * * * * *
    (Eq. F-22)
    
    Where:
    
    FSTP=Flue gas volumetric flow rate at standard temperature and 
    pressure, scfh.
    FActual=Flue gas volumetric flow rate at actual temperature and 
    pressure, acfh.
    TStd=Standard temperature=528  deg.R.
    TStack=Flue gas temperature at flow monitor location,  deg.R, 
    where  deg.R=460+ deg.F.
    PStack=The absolute flue gas pressure=barometric pressure at 
    the flow monitor location + flue gas static pressure, inches of 
    mercury.
    PStd=Standard pressure=29.92 inches of mercury.
    
        74. Appendix F to part 75 is amended by reserving section 7:
        7. [Reserved]
    * * * * *
    
    Appendix G to Part 75--Determination of CO2 Emissions
    
        75. Appendix G to part 75, section 2 is amended by revising 
    sections 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 to read as follows:
    * * * * *
    
    2. Procedures for Estimating CO2 Emissions From Combustion
    
    * * * * *
        2.1  Use the following equation to calculate daily CO2 mass 
    emissions (in tons/day) from the combustion of fossil fuels. Where 
    fuel flow is measured in a common pipe header (i.e., a pipe carrying 
    fuel for multiple units), the owner or operator may use the 
    procedures in section 2.1.2 of appendix D of this part for combining 
    or apportioning emissions, except that the term ``SO2 mass 
    emissions'' is replaced with the term ``CO2 mass emissions.''
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.021
    
    
    
    
    [[Page 26557]]
    
    Where:
    
    Wco2=CO2 emitted from combustion, tons/day.
    MWc=Molecular weight of carbon (12.0).
    MWo2=Molecular weight of oxygen (32.0)
    WC=Carbon burned, lb/day, determined using fuel sampling and 
    analysis and fuel feed rates. Collect at least one fuel sample 
    during each week that the unit combusts coal or oil, one sample per 
    each shipment for diesel fuel, and one fuel sample each month the 
    unit combusts gaseous fuels. Collect coal samples from a location in 
    the fuel handling system that provides a sample representative of 
    the fuel bunkered or consumed during the week. Determine the carbon 
    content of each fuel sampling using one of the following methods: 
    ASTM D3178-89 for coal; ASTM D5291-92 ``Standard Test Methods for 
    Instrumental Determination of Carbon, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen in 
    Petroleum Products and Lubricants,'' ultimate analysis of oil, or 
    computations based upon ASTM D3238-90 and either ASTM D2502-87 or 
    ASTM D2503-82 (Reapproved 1987) for oil; and computations based on 
    ASTM D1945-91 or ASTM D1946-90 for gas. Use daily fuel feed rates 
    from company records for all fuels and the carbon content of the 
    most recent fuel sample under this section to determine tons of 
    carbon per day from combustion of each fuel. (All ASTM methods are 
    incorporated by reference under Sec. 75.6). Where more than one fuel 
    is combusted during a calendar day, calculate total tons of carbon 
    for the day from all fuels.
        2.2  For an affected coal-fired unit, the estimate of daily 
    CO2 mass emissions given by Equation G-1 may be adjusted to 
    account for carbon retained in the ash using the procedures in 
    either section 2.2.1 through 2.2.3 or section 2.2.4 of this 
    appendix.
    * * * * *
        2.3  In lieu of using the procedures, methods, and equations in 
    section 2.1 of this appendix, the owner or operator of an affected 
    gas-fired unit as defined under Sec. 72.2 of this chapter may use 
    the following equation and records of hourly heat input to estimate 
    hourly CO2 mass emissions (in tons).
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.022
    
    
    (Eq.G-4)
    
    Where:
    
    WCO2=CO2 emitted from combustion, tons/hr.
    Fc=Carbon-based F-factor, 1,040 scf/mmBtu for natural gas; 1,420 
    scf/mm/btu for crude, residual, or distillate oil.
    H = Hourly heat input in mmBtu, as calculated using the procedures 
    in section 5 of appendix F of this part.
    Uf=1/385 scf CO2/lb-mole at 14.7 psia and 68  deg.F.
    * * * * *
        76. Appendix G to part 75, section 3 is amended by revising the 
    introductory paragraph; by revising section 3.1.2 before the equation 
    and the definition of the variable ``WS02''; and by adding 
    Equation G-7 and definitions to section
    3.1.2 to read as follows:
    
    3. Procedures for Estimating CO2 Emissions From Sorbent
    
        When the affected unit has a wet flue gas desulfurization 
    system, is a fluidized bed boiler, or uses other emission controls 
    with sorbent injection, use either a CO2 continuous emission 
    monitoring system or an O2 monitor and a flow monitor, or use 
    the procedures, methods, and equations in sections 3.1 through 3.2 
    of this appendix to determine daily CO2 mass emissions from the 
    sorbent (in tons).
        3.1  * * *
        3.1.1  * * *
        3.1.2  In lieu of using Equation G-5, any owner or operator who 
    operates and maintains a certified SO2-diluent continuous 
    emission monitoring system (consisting of an SO2 pollutant 
    concentration monitor and an O2 or CO2 diluent gas 
    monitor), for measuring and recording SO2 emission rate (in lb/
    mmBtu) at the outlet to the emission controls and who uses the 
    applicable procedures, methods, and equations in Sec. 75.15 of this 
    part to estimate the SO2 emissions removal efficiency of the 
    emission controls, may use the following equations to estimate daily 
    CO2 mass emissions from sorbent (in tons).
    (Eq. G-6)
    where:
    * * * * *
    WSO2=Sulfur dioxide removed, lb/day, as calculated below using 
    Eq. G-7.
    * * * * *
    and
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TR17MY95.023
    
    
    (Eq. G-7)
    where:
    
    WSO2=Weight of sulfur dioxide removed, lb/day.
    SO20=SO2 mass emissions monitored at the outlet, lb/day, 
    as calculated using the equations and procedures in section 2 of 
    appendix F of this part.
    %R=Overall percentage SO2 emissions removal efficiency, 
    calculated using Equations 1 through 7 in Sec. 75.15 using daily 
    instead of annual average emission rates.
    * * * * *
    
    Appendix J to Part 75--Compliance Dates for Revised Recordkeeping 
    Requirements and Missing Data Procedures
    
        77. Appendix J to part 75 is added to read as follows:
    
    1. Recordkeeping Requirements
    
        The owner or operator shall meet the recordkeeping requirements 
    of subpart F of this part by following either Secs. 75.50, 75.51 and 
    75.52 or Secs. 75.54, 75.55 and 75.56, from July 17, 1995 through 
    December 31, 1995. On or after January 1, 1996, the owner or 
    operator shall meet the recordkeeping requirements of subpart F of 
    this part by [[Page 26558]] meeting the requirements of Secs. 75.54, 
    75.55, and 75.56.
    
    2. Missing Data Substitution Procedures
    
        The owner or operator shall meet the missing data substitution 
    requirements for carbon dioxide (CO2) and heat input by 
    following either Secs. 75.35 and 75.36 or sections 4.3.1 through 
    4.3.3, section 4.4.3 and sections 5.3 through 5.4 of appendix F of 
    this part from July 17, 1995 through December 31, 1995. The owner or 
    operator shall meet the missing data substitution requirements for 
    fuel flowmeters in appendix D of this part by following either 
    section 2.4.3.1 or sections 2.4.3.2 and 2.4.3.3 of appendix D of 
    this part from July 17, 1995 through December 31, 1995. On or after 
    January 1, 1996, the owner or operator shall meet the missing data 
    substitution requirements for CO2 concentration, that input and 
    fuel flowmeters by meeting the requirements of Secs. 75.35 and 75.36 
    and sections 2.4.3.2 through 2.4.3.3 of appendix D of this part.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-11498 Filed 5-10-95; 3:40 pm]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P