95-23958. Final Promulgation of Revisions to the New Source Review State Implementation Plan; Illinois  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 27, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49778-49781]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-23958]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [IL78-2-6839; FRL-5274-9]
    
    
    Final Promulgation of Revisions to the New Source Review State 
    Implementation Plan; Illinois
    
    AGENCY: United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The USEPA approves a requested State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
    revision submitted by the State of Illinois for the purpose of meeting 
    requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (amended Act) 
    with regard to new source review (NSR) in areas that have not attained 
    the National ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The requested 
    revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal 
    requirements for an approvable nonattainment new source review SIP for 
    Illinois.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: October 27,1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the State's submittal and other information are 
    available for inspection during normal business hours at the following 
    location:
    
        United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and 
    Radiation Division, Regulation Development Branch, 77 West Jackson 
    Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
        A copy of these SIP revisions is available for inspection at the 
    following location:
    
        Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) Docket and Information Center 
    (Air Docket 6102), room M1500, United States Environmental Protection 
    Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 260-7548.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Buzecky, Environmental 
    
    [[Page 49779]]
    Protection Specialist, or Genevieve Nearmyer, Environmental Engineer, 
    Permits and Grants Section, Regulation Development Branch (AR-18J), 
    United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
    Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
        Anyone wishing to come to the Region 5 offices should first contact 
    Ms. Buzecky at (312) 886-3194 or Ms. Nearmyer at (312) 353-4761. 
    Reference file IL78-2-6839.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        The air quality planning requirements for nonattainment NSR are set 
    out in part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (Act). The USEPA has 
    issued a ``General Preamble'' describing its preliminary views on how 
    USEPA intends to review SIPs and SIP revisions submitted under part D, 
    including those State submittals containing nonattainment area NSR SIP 
    requirements (see 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992) and 57 FR 18070 (April 
    28, 1992)). Because USEPA is describing its interpretations here only 
    in broad terms, the reader should refer to the General Preamble for a 
    more detailed discussion of the interpretations of part D advanced in 
    this proposal and the supporting rationale. The USEPA is currently 
    developing a proposed rule to assist the implementation of the changes 
    under the amended Act in the new source review provisions in parts C 
    and D of title I of the Act. The USEPA anticipates that the proposed 
    rule will be published for public comment in mid-1995. If USEPA has not 
    taken final action on States' NSR submittals by that time, USEPA may 
    refer to the proposed rule as the most authoritative guidance available 
    regarding the approvability of the submittals. USEPA expects to take 
    final action to promulgate a rule to implement the parts C and D 
    changes sometime during 1995. Upon promulgation of those regulations, 
    USEPA will review the NSR SIPs of all States to determine whether 
    additional SIP revisions are necessary.
        Prior to USEPA approval of a State's NSR SIP submission, the State 
    may continue permitting only in accordance with the new statutory 
    requirements for permit applications completed after the relevant SIP 
    submittal date. This policy was explained in transition guidance 
    memoranda from John Seitz dated March 11, 1991 and September 3, 1992.
        As explained in the March 11 memorandum, USEPA does not believe 
    Congress intended to mandate the more stringent title I NSR 
    requirements during the time provided for SIP development. States were 
    thus allowed to continue to issue permits consistent with requirements 
    in their current NSR SIPs during that period, or apply 40 CFR part 51, 
    appendix S for newly designated areas that did not previously have NSR 
    SIP requirements.
        The September 3 memorandum also addressed the situation where 
    States did not submit the part D NSR SIP requirements or revisions by 
    the applicable statutory deadline. For permit applications found 
    complete by the SIP submittal deadline, States may issue final permits 
    under the prior NSR rules, assuming certain conditions in the September 
    3 memorandum are met. However, for applications completed after the SIP 
    submittal deadline, USEPA will consider the source to be in compliance 
    with the Act only where the source obtains from the State a permit that 
    is consistent with the substantive new NSR part D provisions in the 
    amended Act. USEPA believes this guidance continues to apply to 
    permitting pending final action on NSR SIP submittals.
        In a September 23, 1994, Federal Register document, USEPA proposed 
    approval with a contingency, and disapproval in the alternative, of 
    Illinois' NSR SIP submittal. 59 FR 48839. The USEPA received public 
    comment on the proposal, and compiled a Technical Support Document 
    (TSD) which describes the State's correction of the existing 
    deficiencies contained in its NSR submittal. In this document, USEPA is 
    taking final action to promulgate approval of Illinois' NSR SIP 
    requirements.
    
    II. Final Action and Implications
    
    A. Analysis of State Submission
    
        The USEPA received comments from one organization supporting 
    USEPA's proposal. A copy of this comment is available in a document 
    contained in the docket at the address noted in the ADDRESSES section 
    above.
        In USEPA's proposal, USEPA explained that the Illinois NSR 
    submittal contained a deficiency for which USEPA proposed approval of 
    the State's requested SIP revision with a contingency and a proposed 
    disapproval in the alternative. This deficiency was due to written 
    interpretations of section 203.209(b) adopted by the State in an 
    attempt to implement the amended Act's special provisions for serious 
    and severe ozone nonattainment areas, section 182(c)(6)-(8). The 
    interpretations adopted by the State were deficient in that they did 
    not ensure the Federal enforceability of any future emission reductions 
    used for netting credits and failed to account for all emission 
    increases occurring during the contemporaneous period. Because the 
    language of the rule was itself approvable, USEPA proposed to approve 
    section 203.209(b) adopted by the State contingent upon the State's 
    withdrawal of its interpretations of section 203.209(b). For further 
    explanation of USEPA's rationale see proposal. 59 FR 48841-48842.
        On November 10, 1994, Bharat Mathur, the Illinois Environmental 
    Protection Agency (IEPA) Chief of the Bureau of Air, sent a letter to 
    USEPA committing to the withdrawal of the above-mentioned 
    interpretations. On February 2, 1995, the IEPA and the Illinois 
    Environmental Regulatory Group filed a Joint Motion to Reconsider the 
    Board Opinion and Order of April 22, 1993. The motion requested that 
    the Board strike from the Opinion and Order its interpretation of 
    section 203.209(b) of the Amended Rule.
        On February 16, 1995, the correction of the deficiencies in section 
    203.209(b) became effective upon the Board's adoption of a Final 
    Opinion and Order upon Reconsideration. Because the State withdrew the 
    interpretation of section 203.209(b) adopted previously by the Board, 
    the State has corrected the deficiency in its NSR SIP submittal. USEPA, 
    therefore, can finally approve the State's NSR SIP.
        In addition to the above deficiency, the proposal discussed 
    additional changes of consequence to the State's NSR SIP. One such 
    change is the substitution of a plantwide definition of source for a 
    dual definition of stationary source. As explained in the proposal, 
    this change will not affect the State's ability to eventually achieve 
    attainment. 59 FR 48843. USEPA is also approving the switch from a dual 
    to plantwide definition of stationary source.
        One additional issue of importance is the applicability of control 
    requirements for major stationary sources of particulate matter (PM) 
    also applying to major stationary sources of PM precursors. If USEPA 
    determines that major stationary sources of PM precursors do not 
    significantly contribute to PM levels that exceed the NAAQS, then 
    section 189(e) of the Act would no longer require NSR on major 
    precursor sources. As explained in the proposal, 59 FR 48842, USEPA 
    promulgated a final rule on October 21, 1993, finding that precursors 
    do not significantly contribute to PM concentrations in the LaSalle 
    nonattainment area, and proposed a rulemaking on May 25, 1994, 
    asserting that precursors do not significantly contribute to PM 
    concentrations in the remaining three PM nonattainment areas of 
    Illinois: McCook, Lake Calumet 
    
    [[Page 49780]]
    and Granite City. (See 58 FR 54291 for final PM rulemaking in LaSalle 
    nonattainment area; 59 FR 26988 for proposed PM rulemaking in McCook, 
    Lake Calumet and Granite City). The McCook proposal was finalized since 
    this rulemaking on November 18, 1994. (See 59 FR 59653 for final PM 
    rulemaking in McCook, Lake Calumet and Granite City). Because these two 
    rulemakings evidence that PM precursors do not significantly contribute 
    to PM concentrations in all four PM nonattainment areas of the State, 
    USEPA is approving that NSR is no longer required on major PM precursor 
    sources in the State of Illinois.
    
    B. Final Actions
    
        As stated above, the Illinois NSR submittal contained a deficiency 
    for which USEPA proposed approval of the State's requested SIP revision 
    with a contingency and a proposed disapproval in the alternative. USEPA 
    approves Illinois' NSR submittal based upon the February 16, 1995, 
    Board withdrawal of all interpretations of section 203.209(b). USEPA 
    also approves the State's substitution of a plantwide definition of 
    stationary source for a dual source definition and approves the State's 
    ability to no longer require NSR on major PM precursor sources. USEPA 
    approves all elements of the State's NSR SIP submitted to comply with 
    the amended Act.
    
    III. Executive Order 12866
    
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
    Federal Register on January 19, 1989(54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
    July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for 
    Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for 
    revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be 
    considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and 
    environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and 
    regulatory requirements.
    
    IV. Regulatory Flexibility
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., USEPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, USEPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, 
    and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act 
    do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements 
    that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP-
    approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify that it does 
    not have a significant impact on any small entities affected. Moreover, 
    due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the Act, 
    preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would constitute 
    Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State action. The 
    Act forbids USEPA to base its actions concerning SIP's on such grounds. 
    Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S.Ct 1976); 42 
    U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    
    V. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, USEPA 
    must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or 
    final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs to State, local, or tribunal governments in the aggregate; or to 
    the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, USEPA 
    must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
    that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
    statutory requirements. Section 203 requires USEPA to establish a plan 
    for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
    significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        USEPA has determined that the final approval action promulgated 
    today does not include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal 
    governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal 
    action approves pre-existing requirements under State or local law, and 
    imposes now new Federal requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs 
    to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, 
    result from this action.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
    Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, 
    Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Volatile organic compounds.
    
        Dated: July 27, 1995.
    Robert Springer,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title 
    40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended to read as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S. C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart O--llinois
    
        2. Section 52.720 is amended by adding paragraph (c) (113) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.720  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (113) On April 27, 1995, the Illinois Environmental Protection 
    Agency requested a revision to the Illinois State Implementation Plan 
    in the form of revisions to the State's New Source Review rules for 
    sources in the Chicago and metropolitan East St. Louis ozone 
    nonattainment areas and are intended to satisfy Federal requirements of 
    the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. The State's New Source Review 
    provisions are codified at Title 35: Environmental Protection Subtitle 
    B: Air Pollution, Chapter I: Pollution Control Board, Subchapter a: 
    Permits and General Provisions. Part 203 Major Stationary Sources 
    Construction and Modification is amended as follows:
        (i) Incorporation by reference.
        (A) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart A: General 
    Provisions, Section 203.101 Definitions, Section 203.107 Allowable 
    Emissions, Section 203.110 Available Growth Margin, Section 203.112 
    Building, Structure and Facility, Section 203.121 Emission Offset, 
    Section 203.122 Emissions Unit, Section 203.123 federally Enforceable, 
    Section 203.126 Lowest Achievable Emission Rate, Section 203.128 
    Potential to Emit, Section 203.145 Volatile Organic Material, Section 
    203.150 Public Participation. Effective April 30, 1993.
        (B) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart B: Major Stationary 
    Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.201 Prohibition, Section 
    203.203 Construction Permit Requirement and Application, Section 
    203.206 Major Stationary Source, Section 203.207 Major Modification of 
    a 
    
    [[Page 49781]]
    Source, Section 203.208 Net Emission Determination, Section 203.209 
    Significant Emissions Determination. Effective April 30, 1993.
        (C) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart C: Requirements for 
    Major Stationary Sources in Nonattainment Areas, Section 203.301 Lowest 
    Achievable Emission Rate, Section 203.302 Maintenance of Reasonable 
    Further Progress and Emission Offsets, Section 203.303 Baseline and 
    Emission Offsets Determination, Section 203.306 Analysis of 
    Alternatives. Effective April 30, 1993.
        (D) Title 35: Environmental Protection, Subpart H: Offsets for 
    Emission Increases From Rocket Engines and Motor Firing, Section 
    203.801 Offsetting by Alternative or Innovative Means. Effective April 
    30, 1993. Published in the Illinois Register, Volume 17, Issue 20, May 
    14, 1993.
    [FR Doc. 95-23958 Filed 9-26-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/27/1995
Published:
09/27/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-23958
Dates:
October 27,1995.
Pages:
49778-49781 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IL78-2-6839, FRL-5274-9
PDF File:
95-23958.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.720