96-9653. Vessel Rebuilt Determinations  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 78 (Monday, April 22, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 17814-17816]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-9653]
    
    
    
    
    [[Page 17813]]
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part V
    
    
    
    
    
    Department of Transportation
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    Coast Guard
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    46 CFR Part 67
    
    
    
    Vessel Rebuilt Determinations; Final Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 78 / Monday, April 22, 1996 / Rules 
    and Regulations
    
    [[Page 17814]]
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    
    46 CFR Part 67
    
    [CGD 94-040]
    RIN 2115-AE85
    
    
    Vessel Rebuilt Determinations
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending its regulation to clarify the 
    standard for determining when work on a vessel performed outside of the 
    U.S. constitutes a foreign rebuilding, which results in a loss of 
    coastwise privileges. Clarifying this standard will help vessel owners 
    and operators make better business decisions regarding work to be 
    performed on their vessels. This rule adopts a notice of proposed 
    rulemaking (NPRM) titled Vessel Rebuilt Determinations (CGD 94-040; 60 
    FR 17290) published on April 5, 1995, as final with minor changes.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on June 21, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Unless otherwise indicated, documents referred to in this 
    preamble are available for inspection or copying at the office of the 
    Executive Secretary, Marine Safety Council (G-LRA/3406) (CGD 94-025), 
    U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street SW., Washington, DC 
    20593-0001, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays. The telephone number is (202) 267-1477.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTJG Michael Antonellis, National 
    Maritime Center at (703) 235-8447.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Regulatory History
    
        Two public meetings were held, both preceded by a notice in the 
    Federal Register. The first meeting was on November 16, 1993 (58 FR 
    51298), and the second on February 15, 1994 (59 FR 725). The stated 
    purpose of the public meetings was to obtain public input concerning 
    whether the Coast Guard should undertake rulemaking to develop clearer 
    standards for vessel rebuilt determinations.
        On May 10, 1994, the Coast Guard published a policy statement in 
    the Federal Register (CGD 93-063; 59 FR 24060) announcing that it was 
    planning to undertake rulemaking regarding vessel rebuilt 
    determinations.
        As indicated above, on April 5, 1995, the Coast Guard published the 
    NPRM. In the NPRM, the Coast Guard proposed to clarify when a vessel is 
    deemed to have been rebuilt outside the United States, thereby losing 
    the privilege of engaging in the coastwise trade.
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        When Congress enacted the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. app. 
    Sec. 883), popularly referred to as the ``Jones Act,'' it included a 
    provision to provide for a protected trade. Section 27 of the Jones Act 
    generally prohibited the transportation of merchandise in the coastwise 
    trade except in vessels built in and documented under the laws of the 
    United States and owned by citizens of the United States.
        In 1956, Congress amended Section 27 by enacting what is known as 
    the ``Second Proviso.'' Under the proviso as enacted, a vessel of more 
    than 500 gross tons entitled to engage in the coastwise trade which is 
    later rebuilt outside the United States permanently loses the right to 
    engage in the coastwise trade. Further, the proviso originally required 
    the owner of a vessel of more than 500 gross tons documented in the 
    United States which is rebuilt outside the United States to make a 
    report of the circumstances of the rebuilding to the Secretary of 
    Transportation.
        The Second Proviso was amended numerous times as discussed in the 
    NPRM and now applies to all vessels engaged in coastwise trade, 
    regardless of tonnage. It was implemented by the Coast Guard primarily 
    by regulations at 46 CFR Sec. 67.177. The regulatory standard in 
    Sec. 67.177 states that a vessel is rebuilt when ``any considerable 
    part of its hull or superstructure is built upon or substantially 
    altered.'' While the wording of the regulatory standard has remained 
    stable over the years, the Coast Guard's administration of the standard 
    has changed and is fully discussed in the NPRM.
    
    Discussion of Comments and Changes
    
        The Coast Guard received three letters in response to the NPRM. Two 
    letters specifically complimented the Coast Guard for its efforts in 
    providing the industry with clearer standards relating to vessel 
    rebuilt determinations. Generally, the three letters addressed the six 
    matters discussed below.
        First: Two comments suggested that the Coast Guard provide a list 
    of items, such as furnishings and fittings, that could be excluded from 
    being considered as part of the hull and superstructure for purposes of 
    making vessel rebuilt determinations. In the preamble to the NPRM, the 
    Coast Guard identified a number of items which it has previously 
    considered to be furnishings and fittings. This list, which is not 
    exhaustive, may be used for guidance. The Coast Guard believes that 
    providing a specific list would work to the detriment of vessel owners 
    and limit the Coast Guard's flexibility to determine whether those 
    items not included on the list should or should not be excluded.
        Second: One comment recommended that the numerical lower and upper 
    parameters of 5 percent to 10 percent be adjusted to provide greater 
    flexibility. Paragraph (b) of Sec. 67.177 of the NPRM establishes 
    numerical parameters for rebuilt determinations for vessels, the hull 
    and superstructure of which are constructed of steel or aluminum. The 
    Coast Guard agrees that adjusting the minimum threshold to 7.5 percent 
    is appropriate because that level reflects the Coast Guard's past 
    determinations of the percentage of steelweight that does not 
    constitute a rebuilding. However, the Coast Guard finds that raising 
    the maximum threshold would not reflect past Coast Guard practices. 
    Therefore, in order to adopt a standard that is consistent with past 
    Coast Guard practices, the numerical lower and upper parameters in the 
    final rule are set at 7.5 percent and 10 percent. The Coast Guard's 
    National Maritime Center, after consultation with the Maritime 
    Administration and the maritime industry, will reevaluate these minimum 
    and maximum threshold levels in the future. Based on the history of 
    vessel rebuild determinations, the Coast Guard may propose additional 
    changes to these levels and perhaps other aspects of vessel rebuilt 
    determinations. A shipowner may still apply for a preliminary rebuilt 
    determination regardless of the level of work being done.
        Third: One comment favored the use of a ``surface area comparison'' 
    as opposed to the ``comparability'' standard proposed for vessels built 
    of materials other than steel or aluminum. The comparability approach 
    provided in paragraph (c) of Sec. 67.177 of the NPRM requires that the 
    applicant for a rebuilt determination calculate to the maximum extent 
    practicable what the steelweight of the vessel as a whole would be if 
    it were constructed of steel or aluminum. This standard has been tested 
    over time and determined to work effectively.
        Fourth: One comment indicated a need for the Coast Guard to clarify 
    that repairs in kind should be exempted from the standards applicable 
    to vessel rebuilt determinations. The Coast Guard believes that vessels 
    undergoing repairs overseas should continue to report these repairs and 
    provide the necessary information to ensure that the Coast Guard can 
    make an independent
    
    [[Page 17815]]
    
    determination that the vessel has not been rebuilt.
        Fifth: One comment requested that the term ``vessel steelweight'' 
    be clarified. Vessel steelweight is the actual weight of the hull and 
    superstructure without furnishings and outfit, machinery, and fluids. 
    The term ``vessel steelweight'' is intended to mean the same as 
    ``discounted lightship weight.''
        Sixth: One comment expressed concern that if a vessel is determined 
    to be rebuilt, it may also be considered a new vessel and, as a result, 
    be subject to the provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) 
    (Pub. L. 101-380). A rebuilt determination will not result in a vessel 
    being reclassified as a new vessel. If a vessel is subject to this 
    regulation and is determined to be rebuilt outside of the U.S. pursuant 
    to this rule, then that vessel will lose its coastwise privileges. 
    Whether a vessel is subject to the applicability of OPA requirements is 
    in no way determined by this rule. That a vessel loses its coastwise 
    privileges because it has been determined to have been rebuilt outside 
    of the U.S. does not mean necessarily that the vessel will be 
    considered essentially a new vessel and subject to OPA requirements.
        After reviewing and considering these comments, the Coast Guard is 
    adopting the NPRM as final with minor modifications. In effect, the 
    term ``Commandant'' wherever it appeared in the NPRM was replaced with 
    the term ``National Vessel Documentation Center'' (NVDC). The final 
    rule raises the lower parameter of a rebuilt determination to from 5 
    percent to 7.5 percent. The Coast Guard has undergone a significant 
    reorganization and, as a result, established the NVDC in West Virginia 
    to streamline the vessel documentation program. The public was informed 
    of the establishment of NVDC in a Federal Register notice published on 
    June 15, 1995 (60 FR 31602).
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        These regulations are not a significant regulatory action under 
    section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and do not require an assessment 
    of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that order. 
    They have not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget 
    under that order. However, they are considered significant under the 
    regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Transportation 
    (DOT) (44 FR 11040; February 26, 1979) due to the interests expressed 
    by a segment of the maritime industry and the Government of Canada.
        The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of these regulations to 
    be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of 
    the regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is unnecessary. These 
    regulations merely clarify existing policies and practices followed in 
    evaluating rebuilt determinations. As such, the changes are 
    administrative in nature and provide better guidance to vessel owners 
    planning for work to be performed on their vessels.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 
    Coast Guard must consider whether these regulations will have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    ``Small entities'' may include: (1) small businesses and not-for-profit 
    organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not 
    dominant in their fields; and (2) governmental jurisdictions with 
    populations of less than 50,000.
        The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of these regulations to 
    be minimal because they clarify existing policy and practices. The 
    changes to the existing regulations are administrative in nature and 
    are designed to provide better guidance to vessel owners planning to 
    perform work on their vessels. Because it expects the impact of this 
    rule to be minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) 
    that these regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviews each rule that contains a 
    collection-of-information requirement to determine whether the 
    practical value of the information is worth the burden imposed by its 
    collection. Collection-of-information requirements include reporting, 
    recordkeeping, notification, and other similar requirements.
        This regulation contains collection-of-information requirements in 
    46 CFR 67.177. However, these collection-of-information requirements 
    are the same as those contained in the existing regulations which have 
    been previously approved by OMB and assigned Control No. 2115-0110. 
    This regulation adds no new or additional collection-of-information 
    requirements. The regulations will reduce paperwork submissions by 
    providing sufficiently clear guidance that many of the applications for 
    preliminary rebuilt determinations may become unnecessary.
    
    Federalism
    
        This rulemaking has been analyzed in accordance with the principles 
    and criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and it has been 
    determined that this rulemaking does not have sufficient federalism 
    implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environment
    
        The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this 
    rulemaking and concluded that, under paragraph 2.B.2 of Commandant 
    Instruction M16475.1B, this rule is categorically excluded from further 
    environmental documentation. This rule is administrative in nature and 
    will have no significant effect on the environment. A ``Categorical 
    Exclusion Determination'' is available in the docket for inspection or 
    copying where indicated under ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 46 CFR Part 67
    
        Fees, Incorporation by reference, Vessels.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 46 
    CFR part 67 as follows:
    
    PART 67--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 67 is revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 14 U.S.C. 664; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 9118; 46 
    U.S.C. 2103, 2107, 2110; 46 U.S.C. app. 841a, 876; 49 CFR 1.45, 
    1.46.
    
    
    Sec. 67.19  [Amended]
    
        2. In Sec. 67.19(d)(3), remove ``67.177(a)'' and add, in its place, 
    ``67.177''.
    
    
    Sec. 67.21  [Amended]
    
        3. In Sec. 67.21(c), remove ``67.177(a)'' and add, in its place, 
    ``67.177''.
        4. Section 67.177 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 67.177  Application for foreign rebuilding determination.
    
        A vessel is deemed rebuilt foreign when any considerable part of 
    its hull or superstructure is built upon or substantially altered 
    outside of the United States. In determining whether a vessel is 
    rebuilt foreign, the following parameters apply:
        (a) Regardless of its material of construction, a vessel is deemed 
    rebuilt when a major component of the hull or superstructure not built 
    in the United States is added to the vessel.
        (b) For a vessel of which the hull and superstructure is 
    constructed of steel or aluminum--
        (1) A vessel is deemed rebuilt when work performed on its hull or 
    superstructure constitutes more than 10
    
    [[Page 17816]]
    
    percent of the vessel's steelweight, prior to the work, also known as 
    discounted lightship weight.
        (2) A vessel may be considered rebuilt when work performed on its 
    hull or superstructure constitutes more than 7.5 percent but not more 
    than 10 percent of the vessel's steelweight prior to the work.
        (3) A vessel is not considered rebuilt when work performed on its 
    hull or superstructure constitutes 7.5 percent or less of the vessel's 
    steelweight prior to the work.
        (c) For a vessel of which the hull and superstructure is 
    constructed of material other than steel or aluminum--
        (1) A vessel is deemed rebuilt when work performed on its hull or 
    superstructure constitutes a quantum of work determined, to the maximum 
    extent practicable, to be comparable to more than 10 percent of the 
    vessel's steelweight prior to the work, calculated as if the vessel 
    were wholly constructed of steel or aluminum.
        (2) A vessel may be considered rebuilt when work performed on its 
    hull or superstructure constitutes a quantum of work determined, to the 
    maximum extent practicable, to be comparable to more than 7.5 percent 
    but not more than 10 percent of the vessel's steelweight prior to the 
    work, calculated as if the vessel were wholly constructed of steel or 
    aluminum.
        (3) A vessel is not considered rebuilt when work performed on its 
    hull or superstructure constitutes a quantum of work determined, to the 
    maximum extent practicable, to be comparable to 7.5 percent or less of 
    the vessel's steelweight prior to the work, calculated as if the vessel 
    were wholly constructed of steel or aluminum.
        (d) For a vessel of mixed construction, such as a vessel the hull 
    of which is constructed of steel or aluminum and the superstructure of 
    which is constructed of fibrous reinforced plastic, the steelweight of 
    the work performed on the portion of the vessel constructed of a 
    material other than steel or aluminum will be determined, to the 
    maximum extent practicable, and aggregated with the work performed on 
    the portion of the vessel constructed of steel or aluminum. The 
    numerical parameters described in paragraph (b) of this section will 
    then be applied to the aggregate of the work performed on the vessel 
    compared to the vessel's steelweight prior to the work, calculated as 
    if the vessel were wholly constructed of steel or aluminum, to 
    determine whether the vessel has been rebuilt.
        (e) The owner of a vessel currently entitled to coastwise, Great 
    Lakes, or fisheries endorsements which is altered outside the United 
    States and the work performed is determined to constitute or be 
    comparable to more than 7.5 percent of the vessel's steelweight prior 
    to the work, or which has a major component of the hull or 
    superstructure not built in the United States added, must file the 
    following information with the National Vessel Documentation Center 
    within 30 days following the earlier of completion of the work or 
    redelivery of the vessel to the owner or owner's representative:
        (1) A written statement applying for a rebuilt determination, 
    outlining in detail the work performed and naming the place(s) where 
    the work was performed;
        (2) Calculations showing the actual or comparable steelweight of 
    the work performed on the vessel, the actual or comparable steelweight 
    of the vessel, and comparing the actual or comparable steelweight of 
    the work performed to the actual or comparable steelweight of the 
    vessel;
        (3) Accurate sketches or blueprints describing the work performed; 
    and
        (4) Any further submissions requested by the National Vessel 
    Documentation Center.
        (f) Regardless of the extent of actual work performed, the owner of 
    a vessel currently entitled to coastwise, Great Lakes, or fisheries 
    endorsements may, as an alternative to filing the items listed in 
    paragraph (e) of this section, submit a written statement to the 
    National Vessel Documentation Center declaring the vessel rebuilt 
    outside the United States. The vessel will then be deemed to have been 
    rebuilt outside the United States with loss of trading privileges.
        (g) A vessel owner may apply for a preliminary rebuilt 
    determination by submitting:
        (1) A written statement applying for a preliminary rebuilt 
    determination, outlining in detail the work planned and naming the 
    place(s) where the work is to be performed;
        (2) Calculations showing the actual or comparable steelweight of 
    work to be performed on the vessel, the actual or comparable 
    steelweight of the vessel, and comparing the actual or comparable 
    steelweight of the planned work to the actual or comparable steelweight 
    of the vessel;
        (3) Accurate sketches or blueprints describing the planned work; 
    and
        (4) Any further submissions requested by the National Vessel 
    Documentation Center.
    
        Note: A statement submitted in accordance with paragraph (f) of 
    this section does not constitute an application for a rebuilt 
    determination and does not require payment of a fee.
    
        Dated: March 18, 1996.
    A.E. Henn,
    Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commandant.
    [FR Doc. 96-9653 Filed 4-19-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/21/1996
Published:
04/22/1996
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-9653
Dates:
This final rule is effective on June 21, 1996.
Pages:
17814-17816 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD 94-040
RINs:
2115-AE85: Vessel Rebuild Determinations (CGD 94-040)
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2115-AE85/vessel-rebuild-determinations-cgd-94-040-
PDF File:
96-9653.pdf
CFR: (4)
46 CFR 883)
46 CFR 67.19
46 CFR 67.21
46 CFR 67.177