96-11331. Adjustment of Reid Vapor Pressure Lower Limit for Reformulated Gasoline Sold in the State of California  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 90 (Wednesday, May 8, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 20736-20738]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-11331]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 80
    
    [FRL-5501-3]
    
    
    Adjustment of Reid Vapor Pressure Lower Limit for Reformulated 
    Gasoline Sold in the State of California
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is amending the lower limit of the valid range for Reid 
    Vapor Pressure (RVP) for reformulated gasoline certified under the 
    simple model and sold in the State of California. The lower limit is 
    being changed from 6.6 pounds per square inch (psi) to 6.4 psi. EPA is 
    taking this action because the Agency believes that it will result in 
    no negative environmental impact and, for reasons discussed below, the 
    Agency believes it is proper in the limited case of California 
    gasoline.
        In the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, EPA is 
    proposing the same action covered by this direct final rule (i.e., to 
    amend the lower limit of the valid range for RVP for reformulated 
    gasoline certified under the simple model and sold in the State of 
    California from 6.6 to 6.4 psi). If adverse comment or a request for a 
    public hearing is received on this direct final rule, EPA will withdraw 
    the direct final rule and address the comments received in a subsequent 
    final rule on the related proposed rule. No additional opportunity for 
    public comment on this change to the lower limit of the simple model's 
    valid range for RVP will be provided.
    
    DATES: This action will become effective on July 8, 1996, unless notice 
    is received by June 7, 1996 from someone who wishes to submit adverse 
    comment or requests an opportunity for a public hearing. If such notice 
    is received, EPA will withdraw this direct final rule, and a timely 
    notice will be published in the Federal Register to indicate the 
    withdrawal.
    
    ADDRESSES: All documents relevant to this direct final rulemaking have 
    been placed in public docket number A-96-14. The public docket may be 
    inspected at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket Section, 
    401 M Street, SW, Room M-1500, Washington, D.C. 20460. Documents may be 
    inspected between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through 
    Friday. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying docket materials.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne-Marie C. Pastorkovich, U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, (202) 
    233-9013.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Regulated Entities
    
        Regulated categories and entities potentially affected by this 
    action include:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Category                  Examples of regulated entities   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Industry..........................  Refiners of California gasoline.    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
    guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this 
    action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware 
    could be potentially regulated by this action. Other types of entities 
    not listed in the table could also be regulated. To determine whether 
    your entity is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine 
    section 80.42 (c)(1), note (1), of today's regulatory action. You 
    should also carefully examine the existing provisions at 40 CFR section 
    80.81, dealing specifically with California gasoline.
    
    II. Introduction
    
    A. Reformulated Gasoline Standards and California Covered Areas
    
        Section 211(k) of the Clean Air Act (the Act) requires EPA to 
    establish standards for reformulated gasoline to be used in specified 
    ozone nonattainment areas (covered areas), as well as standards for 
    non-reformulated, or conventional, gasoline used in the rest of the 
    country, beginning in January, 1995. The reformulated gasoline covered 
    areas in California are Los Angeles and San Diego, and, beginning June 
    1, 1996, Sacramento, as a result of its redesignation as a Severe ozone 
    nonattainment area. The Act requires that reformulated gasoline reduce 
    VOC and toxics emissions from motor vehicles, not increase NOX
    
    [[Page 20737]]
    
    emissions, and meet certain content standards for oxygen, benzene and 
    heavy metals. The Administrator signed the final reformulated gasoline 
    regulations on December 15, 1993 and they were published in the Federal 
    Register on February 14, 1994.\1\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 59 FR 7812 (February 16, 1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Specific Exemptions Related to California Gasoline
    
        During the federal reformulated gasoline rulemaking, and in 
    response to comments by California refiners, EPA concluded (1) that VOC 
    and toxics emission reductions resulting from the California Phase 2 
    standards would be equal to or more stringent than the federal 
    reformulated gasoline standards, (2) that the content standards for 
    oxygen and benzene under California Phase 2 would in practice be 
    equivalent to the federal content standards, and (3) that the 
    California Air Resources Board's (CARB's) compliance and enforcement 
    program is designed to be sufficiently rigorous. As a result, 40 CFR 
    Sec. 80.81 of the reformulated gasoline regulations exempts certain 
    refiners of California Phase 2 gasoline from a number of federal 
    reformulated gasoline provisions intended to demonstrate compliance 
    with the federal standards. While the federal reformulated gasoline and 
    conventional gasoline standards continue to apply in California, 
    refiners of gasoline sold in California are exempt in most cases from 
    various enforcement-related provisions. California refiners are not 
    exempt from these federal enforcement requirements with regard to 
    gasoline that is delivered for use outside California, because the 
    California Phase 2 standards and the CARB enforcement program do not 
    cover gasoline exported from California.
    
    C. Reid Vapor Pressure Simple Model Lower Limit
    
        The federal reformulated gasoline program includes limitations on 
    Reid vapor pressure (RVP) of reformulated gasoline certified using the 
    simple model. The maximum RVP simple model standards are given in 40 
    CFR section 80.41 (a) and (b), relating to per-gallon and averaged 
    standards, respectively. Maximum RVP is controlled because of the 
    increased VOC emissions that result from gasoline with higher RVP 
    levels.
        The minimum RVP of reformulated gasoline certified under the simple 
    model is set by the lower end of the valid range as specified in 40 CFR 
    Sec. 80.42(c)(1). The nationwide lower limit for RVP for reformulated 
    gasoline certified under the simple model is 6.6 psi, although under 40 
    CFR Sec. 80.45(f)(1) this minimum RVP limit changes to 6.4 psi, under 
    the complex model, beginning in 1998.
        There are several reasons why the simple and complex models have 
    different lower limits for the RVP range (for the simple model, 6.6 
    psi, and for the complex model, 6.4 psi). The simple model and complex 
    model are two completely different models, developed at different times 
    from different data sets and relying upon different modeling 
    assumptions and approaches. The complex model, which was developed 
    after the simple model, incorporates many more data points.
        The low end of the valid ranges for RVP in the simple model and the 
    complex model (i.e. 6.6 psi and 6.4 psi, respectively) were based upon 
    the distribution of data used in the model's development. Both the 
    simple model and the complex model are linear with respect to RVP for 
    all pollutants.\2\ Thus, any relationship of RVP to pollutants can be 
    extended linearly from 6.6 psi to 6.4 psi with confidence. (As is 
    explained elsewhere in this notice, the Agency is proposing to lower 
    the minimum RVP for simple model reformulated gasoline in California 
    from 6.6 to 6.4 psi.)
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ See 59 FR 36944 (July 20, 1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        After promulgation of the final reformulated gasoline and anti-
    dumping rule, some refiners suggested that EPA reduce the RVP lower 
    limit for the simple model to 6.4 psi nationwide. The reasons for their 
    request were (1) to provide flexibility for refiners, (2) consistency 
    with the complex model, which has a 6.4 psi lower limit for RVP, and 
    (3) to facilitate the certification and use of California Phase 2 
    gasoline. EPA agreed with these reasons and issued a direct final rule 
    which included this change.\3\ EPA later withdrew the change and 
    published notice of the withdrawal in the Federal Register \4\ because 
    adverse comment was received from the American Automobile Manufacturers 
    Association (AAMA). AAMA, representing automakers, cited concerns about 
    driveability from lower RVP gasoline if RVP was reduced nationwide.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ See note 2.
        \4\ 60 FR 6030 (February 1, 1995).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Revision to the RVP Range Under the Simple Model
    
        The Western States Petroleum Association (WSPA) has requested, on 
    behalf of gasoline refiners in California, that EPA modify the minimum 
    Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) allowable under the simple model for 
    reformulated gasoline sold in California. In an August 3, 1995 letter 
    to Ms. Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, 
    WSPA asserted that it believes that there are certain constraints on 
    refiners that exist as a result of the need to comply with both the 
    federal reformulated gasoline program and the California Phase 2 
    reformulated gasoline program scheduled to begin on March 1, 1996.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\ All correspondence related to this rulemaking may be 
    examined at the public docket at the location listed in the 
    ``ADDRESSES'' section of this notice.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Specifically, the California Phase 2 program sets a maximum 
    summertime volatility standard of 7.0 psi. During the summer, 
    California refiners currently must meet an RVP lower limit of 6.6 psi 
    minimum for areas subject to the federal reformulated gasoline 
    standards (i.e., the lower limit of the federal simple model range) and 
    7.0 psi maximum (i.e., the California RVP maximum standard). This is a 
    ``tighter'' operational range than producers of reformulated gasoline 
    outside of California are required to operate within.\6\ WSPA has 
    requested that EPA change the lower limit RVP value for reformulated 
    gasoline to 6.4 psi in California to allow necessary operating 
    flexibility and the American Automobile Manufacturers Association 
    (AAMA) has indicated in a letter to EPA\7\ that they agree to this 
    change in the case of California gasoline. As discussed above, AAMA had 
    objected to a nationwide change to 6.4 psi lower limit in 1994. More 
    recently, these automakers revised their view with regard to gasoline 
    used in California, and now do not object to changing the RVP minimum 
    value to 6.4 psi in the limited case of California Phase 2 gasoline, as 
    expressed in a letter to EPA dated December 7, 1995.\8\ Specifically, 
    automakers do not expect driveability index concerns with California 
    Phase 2 gasoline with RVP values as low as 6.4 psi, as a result of 
    other controls on certain distillation parameters under the California 
    program. These additional distillation parameters are T50 and T90, the 
    temperature at which 50 percent and 90 percent, respectively, of a 
    liquid are
    
    [[Page 20738]]
    
    evaporated. EPA believes that changing the federal summertime minimum 
    RVP standard to 6.4 psi in California will permit necessary flexibility 
    for producers, is supportable as a reasonable extension of the model 
    based on consistency with the complex model, will result in no 
    environmental harm, and will not adversely affect automotive 
    driveability.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ For federal reformulated gasoline program compliance on a 
    per-gallon basis, the simple model maximum standards for RVP are 
     7.2 psi in VOC Control Region I and  8.1 psi 
    for VOC Control Region II. For average compliance under the federal 
    reformulated gasoline program, the simple model per gallon maximum 
    RVP for VOC controlled federal gasoline, by comparison, is 
    7.4 psi for VOC Control Region I and 8.3 psi 
    for VOC Control Region II and, on average,  7.1 psi and 
     8.0 psi, for VOC Control Regions I and II, respectively. 
    See 40 CFR section 80.41 (a) and (b) and the discussion under II(c) 
    of this notice, above.
        \7\ See note 5, above.
        \8\ See note 5, above.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    IV. Environmental Impact
    
        This rule is expected to have no negative environmental impact. 
    Applicable controls on maximum volatility during the VOC control period 
    are not affected by this rule. If anything, this revision will make it 
    more feasible to produce lower limit RVP gasoline, which produces fewer 
    motor vehicle VOC emissions.
    
    V. Economic Impact
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, requires that 
    Federal Agencies examine the impacts of their regulations on small 
    entities. The act requires an Agency to prepare a regulatory 
    flexibility analysis in conjunction with notice and comment rulemaking, 
    unless the Agency head certifies that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 
    605(b). The Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule 
    is not expected to result in any additional compliance cost to 
    regulated parties and may be expected to reduce compliance cost.
    
    VI. Effective Date
    
        This action will become effective July 8, 1996. If notice of 
    adverse comment is received, EPA will withdraw this final rule, and a 
    timely notice will be published in the Federal Register. See ``DATES'' 
    section, above.
    
    VII. Executive Order 12866
    
        Under Executive Order 12866, \9\ the Agency must determine whether 
    a regulation is ``significant'' and therefore subject to OMB review and 
    the requirements of the Executive Order. The Order defines 
    ``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a 
    rule that may:
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ 58 FR 51736 (October 4, 1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, 
    or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
    economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
    health or safety, or State, local or tribal governments of communities;
        (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
    action taken or planned by another agency;
        (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
    user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
    thereof, or
        (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
    mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
    this Executive Order.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ Id. at section 3(f) (1)-(4).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        It has been determined that this rule is not a ``significant 
    regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is 
    therefore not subject to OMB review.
    
    VIII. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``UMRA''), P.L. 104-4, EPA must prepare a budgetary impact statement 
    to accompany any general notice of proposed rulemaking or final rule 
    that includes a Federal mandate which may result in estimated costs to 
    State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private 
    sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, for any rule 
    subject to Section 202 EPA generally must select the least costly, most 
    cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that achieves the 
    objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory requirements. 
    Under Section 203, before establishing any regulatory requirements that 
    may significantly or uniquely affect small governments, EPA must take 
    steps to inform and advise small governments of the requirements and 
    enable them to provide input.
        EPA has determined that the final rule promulgated today does not 
    include a federal mandate as defined in UMRA. The rule does not include 
    a Federal mandate that may result in estimated annual costs to State, 
    local or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private sector, 
    of $100 million or more, and it does not establish regulatory 
    requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small 
    governments.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Gasoline, 
    Reformulated gasoline, Motor vehicle pollution.
    
        Dated: May 1, 1996.
    Carol M. Browner,
    Administrator.
        40 CFR part 80 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 80--REGULATION OF FUELS AND FUEL ADDITIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: Sections 114, 211 and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act as 
    amended (42 U.S.C. 7414, 7545, and 7601(a)).
    
        2. Section 80.42 is amended by revising the table in paragraph 
    (c)(1) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 80.42  Simple emissions model.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (1) * * *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Fuel parameter                           Range             
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Benzene content........................  0.0-4.9 vol %.                 
    RVP....................................  6.6-9.0 psi.\1\                
    Oxygenate content......................  0-4.0 wt %.                    
    Aromatics content......................  0-55 vol %.                    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ For gasoline sold in California, the applicable RVP range shall be  
      6.4-9.0 psi.                                                          
    
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 96-11331 Filed 5-7-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
7/8/1996
Published:
05/08/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
96-11331
Dates:
This action will become effective on July 8, 1996, unless notice is received by June 7, 1996 from someone who wishes to submit adverse comment or requests an opportunity for a public hearing. If such notice is received, EPA will withdraw this direct final rule, and a timely notice will be published in the Federal Register to indicate the withdrawal.
Pages:
20736-20738 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5501-3
PDF File:
96-11331.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Legacy Index for Docket A-96-14
» Adjustment of Reid Vapor Pressure Lower Limit for Reformulated Gasoline Sold in the State of California
» Adjustment of Reid Vapor Pressure Lower Limit for Reformulated Gasoline Sold in the State of California
CFR: (3)
40 CFR 80.42(c)(1)
40 CFR 80.42
40 CFR 80.81