96-18509. Federal Acquisition Regulation; Employee Compensation Costs  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 145 (Friday, July 26, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 39217-39219]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-18509]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
    
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
    
    48 CFR Part 31
    
    [FAC 90-40; FAR Case 93-005; Item XII]
    RIN 9000-AF97
    
    
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Employee Compensation Costs
    
    AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DOD), General Services Administration 
    (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense 
    Acquisition Regulations Council have agreed on a final rule amending 
    the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to clarify the regulations 
    concerning the allowability of personal services compensation costs. 
    This regulatory action was not subject to Office of Management and 
    Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993, 
    and is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: September 24, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jerry Olson at (202) 501-3221 in 
    reference to this FAR case. For general information, contact the FAR 
    Secretariat, Room 4037, GS Building, Washington, DC 20405 (202) 501-
    4755. Please cite FAC 90-40, FAR case 93-005.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        This final rule amends FAR 31.001, Definitions, and 31.205-6, 
    Compensation for personal services. The Defense Contract Audit Agency 
    has raised concerns that the language in FAR 31.205-6(b) may be 
    susceptible to differing interpretations and that the FAR does not 
    provide adequate guidance with regard to contractor compensation 
    systems. This final rule adds definitions at FAR 31.001; clarifies the 
    standard for reasonableness of labor-management compensation agreements 
    at FAR 31.205-6 (b) and (c); removes the examples from FAR 31.205-6(b); 
    revises FAR 31.205-6(b)(1)(i) to clearly allow offsets of allowable 
    elements of employees' compensation packages among jobs of the same pay 
    grade or level; and revises FAR 31.205-6(i) to provide a general 
    allowability rule. This final rule also makes editorial changes and 
    adds clarifying language. Most notable of these changes is the 
    redesignation of FAR 31.205-6(f)(2) to a restructured and renamed 
    31.205-6(d) to improve the flow of the cost principle and provide a 
    more logical placement of the language.
        A proposed rule was published in the Federal Register at 59 FR 
    51399, October 11, 1994, with corrections published at 59 FR 60686, 
    November 25, 1994. Eighteen comments were received in response to the 
    proposed rule. All comments were considered in the development of the 
    final rule.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and 
    the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this 
    final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because most contracts awarded 
    to small businesses are awarded on a competitive, fixed-price basis and 
    do not require application of the FAR cost principles.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to 
    the FAR do not impose recordkeeping or information collection 
    requirements, or collections of information from offerors, contractors, 
    or members of the public which require the approval of the Office of 
    Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 31
    
        Government procurement.
    
        Dated: July 16, 1996.
    Edward C. Loeb,
    Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
    
        Therefore, 48 CFR Part 31 is amended as set forth below:
    
    PART 31--CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES
    
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 31 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
    U.S.C. 2473(c).
    
        2. Section 31.001 is amended by adding, in alphabetical order, the 
    definitions of ``Job'', ``Job class of employees'', and ``Labor 
    market'' to read as follows:
    
    
    31.001  Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        Job, as used in this part, means a homogeneous cluster of work 
    tasks, the completion of which serves an enduring purpose for the 
    organization. Taken as a whole, the collection of tasks, duties, and 
    responsibilities constitutes the assignment for one or more individuals 
    whose work is of the same nature and is performed at the same skill/ 
    responsibility level--as opposed to a position, which is a collection 
    of tasks assigned to a specific individual. Within a job, there may be 
    pay categories which are dependent on the degree of supervision 
    required by the employee while performing assigned tasks which are 
    performed by all persons with the same job.
        Job class of employees, as used in this part, means employees 
    performing in positions within the same job.
    * * * * *
        Labor market, as used in this part, means a place where individuals 
    exchange their labor for compensation. Labor markets are identified and 
    defined by a combination of the following factors:
        (1) Geography,
        (2) Education and/or technical background required,
        (3) Experience required by the job,
        (4) Licensing or certification requirements,
        (5) Occupational membership, and
        (6) Industry.
    * * * * *
        3. Section 31.205-6 is amended-
        a. By revising the introductory text of paragraph (a) and (a)(1);
        b. In paragraph (a)(5) by removing the parenthetical at the end of 
    the paragraph;
        c. By adding introductory text to paragraph (b) and revising 
    paragraph (b)(1);
        d. By revising the introductory text of paragraph (c);
        e. By revising paragraph (d);
        f. By removing paragraph (f)(2) and redesignating (f)(3) as (f)(2); 
    and
        g. By revising paragraph (i).
        The revised text reads as follows:
    
    
    31.205-6  Compensation for personal services.
    
        (a) General. Compensation for personal services includes all 
    remuneration paid currently or accrued, in whatever form and whether 
    paid immediately or deferred, for services rendered by employees to the 
    contractor during the period of contract performance (except as 
    otherwise provided for in other paragraphs of this subsection). It 
    includes, but is not
    
    [[Page 39218]]
    
    limited to, salaries; wages; directors' and executive committee 
    members' fees; bonuses (including stock bonuses); incentive awards; 
    employee stock options, and stock appreciation rights; employee stock 
    ownership plans; employee insurance; fringe benefits; contributions to 
    pension, other postretirement benefits, annuity, and employee incentive 
    compensation plans; and allowances for off-site pay, incentive pay, 
    location allowances, hardship pay, severance pay, and cost of living 
    differential. Compensation for personal services is allowable subject 
    to the following general criteria and additional requirements contained 
    in other parts of this cost principle:
        (1) Compensation for personal services must be for work performed 
    by the employee in the current year and must not represent a 
    retroactive adjustment of prior years' salaries or wages (but see 
    31.205-6 (g), (h), (j), (k), (m), and (o) of this subsection).
    * * * * *
        (b) Reasonableness. The compensation for personal services paid or 
    accrued to each employee must be reasonable for the work performed. 
    Compensation will be considered reasonable if each of the allowable 
    elements making up the employee's compensation package is reasonable. 
    This paragraph addresses the reasonableness of compensation, except 
    when the compensation is set by provisions of a labor-management 
    agreement under terms of the Federal Labor Relations Act or similar 
    state statutes. The tests for reasonableness of labor-management 
    agreements are set forth in paragraph (c) of this subsection. In 
    addition to the provisions of 31.201-3, in testing the reasonableness 
    of individual elements for particular employees or job classes of 
    employees, consideration should be given to factors determined to be 
    relevant by the contracting officer.
        (1) Among others, factors which may be relevant include general 
    conformity with the compensation practices of other firms of the same 
    size, the compensation practices of other firms in the same industry, 
    the compensation practices of firms in the same geographic area, the 
    compensation practices of firms engaged in predominantly non-Government 
    work, and the cost of comparable services obtainable from outside 
    sources. The appropriate factors for evaluating the reasonableness of 
    compensation depend on the degree to which those factors are 
    representative of the labor market for the job being evaluated. The 
    relative significance of factors will vary according to circumstances. 
    In administering this principle, it is recognized that not every 
    compensation case need be subjected in detail to the tests described in 
    this cost principle. The tests need be applied only when a general 
    review reveals amounts or types of compensation that appear 
    unreasonable or unjustified. Based on an initial review of the facts, 
    contracting officers or their representatives may challenge the 
    reasonableness of any individual element or the sum of the individual 
    elements of compensation paid or accrued to particular employees or job 
    classes of employees. In such cases, there is no presumption of 
    reasonableness and, upon challenge, the contractor must demonstrate the 
    reasonableness of the compensation item in question. In doing so, the 
    contractor may introduce, and the contracting officer will consider, 
    not only any circumstances surrounding the compensation item 
    challenged, but also the magnitude of other compensation elements which 
    may be lower than would be considered reasonable in themselves. 
    However, the contractor's right to introduce offsetting compensation 
    elements into consideration is subject to the following limitations:
        (i) Offsets will be considered only between the allowable elements 
    of an employee's (or a job class of employees') compensation package or 
    between the compensation packages of employees in jobs within the same 
    job grade or level.
        (ii) Offsets will be considered only between the allowable portion 
    of the following compensation elements of employees or job classes of 
    employees:
        (A) Wages and salaries.
        (B) Incentive bonuses.
        (C) Deferred compensation.
        (D) Pension and savings plan benefits.
        (E) Health insurance benefits.
        (F) Life insurance benefits.
        (G) Compensated personal absence benefits. However, any of the 
    above elements or portions thereof, whose amount is not measurable, 
    shall not be introduced or considered as an offset item.
        (iii) In considering offsets, the magnitude of the compensation 
    elements in question must be taken into account. In determining the 
    magnitude of compensation elements, the timing of receipt by the 
    employee must be considered.
    * * * * *
        (c) Labor-management agreements. If costs of compensation 
    established under ``arm's length'' negotiated labor-management 
    agreements are otherwise allowable, the costs are reasonable if, as 
    applied to work in performing Government contracts, they are not 
    determined to be unwarranted by the character and circumstances of the 
    work or discriminatory against the Government. The application of the 
    provisions of a labor-management agreement designed to apply to a given 
    set of circumstances and conditions of employment (e.g, work involving 
    extremely hazardous activities or work not requiring recurrent use of 
    overtime) is unwarranted when applied to a Government contract 
    involving significantly different circumstances and conditions of 
    employment (e.g., work involving less hazardous activities or work 
    continually requiring use of overtime). It is discriminatory against 
    the Government if it results in employee compensation (in whatever form 
    or name) in excess of that being paid for similar non-Government work 
    under comparable circumstances. Disallowance of costs will not be made 
    under this paragraph (c) unless--
    * * * * *
        (d) Form of payment. (1) Compensation for personal services 
    includes compensation paid or to be paid in the future to employees in 
    the form of cash, corporate securities, such as stocks, bonds, and 
    other financial instruments (see paragraph (d)(2) of this subsection 
    regarding valuation), or other assets, products, or services.
        (2) When compensation is paid with securities of the contractor or 
    of an affiliate, the following additional restrictions apply:-
        (i) Valuation placed on the securities shall be the fair market 
    value on the measurement date (i.e., the first date the number of 
    shares awarded is known) determined upon the most objective basis 
    available.-
        (ii) Accruals for the cost of securities before issuing the 
    securities to the employees shall be subject to adjustment according to 
    the possibilities that the employees will not receive the securities 
    and that their interest in the accruals will be forfeited.
    * * * * *-
        (i) Compensation based on changes in the prices of corporate 
    securities or corporate security ownership, such as stock options, 
    stock appreciation rights, phantom stock plans, and junior stock 
    conversions.
        (1) Any compensation which is calculated, or valued, based on 
    changes in the price of corporate securities is unallowable.
        (2) Any compensation represented by dividend payments or which is 
    calculated based on dividend payments is unallowable.
    
    [[Page 39219]]
    
        (3) If a contractor pays an employee in lieu of the employee 
    receiving or exercising a right, option, or benefit which would have 
    been unallowable under this paragraph (i), such payments are also 
    unallowable.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 96-18509 Filed 7-25-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
9/24/1996
Published:
07/26/1996
Department:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-18509
Dates:
September 24, 1996.
Pages:
39217-39219 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FAC 90-40, FAR Case 93-005, Item XII
RINs:
9000-AF97
PDF File:
96-18509.pdf
CFR: (1)
48 CFR 31