96-29690. Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Cerritos Channel, CA  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 20, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 59025-59026]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-29690]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    Coast Guard
    
    33 CFR Part 117
    
    [CGD11-90-03]
    RIN-2115-A47
    
    
    Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Cerritos Channel, CA
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Temporary final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: At the request of the Port of Los Angeles, the Coast Guard is 
    temporarily changing the regulation for operation of the Henry Ford 
    Avenue Railroad Bridge (Ford Bridge), across Cerritos Channel of Los 
    Angeles/Long Beach Harbor, mile 4.8, Long Beach, California, to 
    authorize it to remain in the closed to navigation position for 5 
    months, from February 1 to June 30, 1997. This action is necessary both 
    to facilitate reconstruction of the bridge and to avoid disrupting 
    essential rail service during reconstruction. If, due to the state of 
    construction, passage through the draw becomes temporarily possible 
    during the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish that fact in 
    the Local Notice to Mariners.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This temporary final rule will be effective from 
    February 1 through June 30, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Unless otherwise indicated, documents referred to in this 
    preamble are available for inspection or copying at the office of 
    Commander (Pow), Eleventh Coast Guard District, Building 50-6, Coast 
    Guard Island, Alameda, CA 94501-5100 between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is (510) 
    437-3514. Commander (Pow) maintains the public docket for this 
    rulemaking.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Susan Worden, Bridge Administrator, Eleventh Coast Guard District, at 
    (510) 437-3514.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Regulatory History
    
        On August 28, 1990, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed 
    rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register (55 FR 35154). The NPRM 
    discussed a six and one-half month closure during efforts to 
    rehabilitate the historic bridge. On July 8, 1996, the Coast Guard 
    published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) in the 
    Federal Register (61 FR 35702). The SNPRM responded to all comments 
    submitted in response to the NPRM and discussed a five month closure 
    during efforts to replace portions of the bridge and to reconstruct 
    other portions. The comment period established in the SNPRM ended on 
    August 7, 1996. The Coast Guard received no comments on the proposal 
    discussed in the SNPRM. A public hearing was not requested and no 
    hearing was held.
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The principal persons involved in drafting this regulation are 
    Susan Worden, Project Manager, Eleventh Coast Guard District, and 
    Lieutenant (junior grade) Martin Sarch, Project Attorney, Maintenance & 
    Logistics Command Pacific Legal Division.
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        At the request of the Port of Los Angeles, the Coast Guard is 
    temporarily changing the regulation for operation of the Ford Bridge at 
    mile 4.8, Los Cerritos Channel, in the Los Angeles/Long Beach Harbor. 
    The Ford Bridge, also known as the Badger Avenue Bridge, provides the 
    only rail access to Terminal Island. It crosses a waterway used by 
    oceangoing cargo ships, tugs and barges, tour boats, commercial fishing 
    vessels, and recreational boats. Existing regulations require the 
    bridge to remain fully open except for the passage of trains or for 
    maintenance.
        The bridge is over 70 years old and no longer meets California 
    seismic standards or Federal Railroad Administration clearance 
    standards. Interruption or delay of rail and water traffic is likely if 
    the existing bridge were either to malfunction or to be damaged by 
    seismic activity. In 1995, the Coast Guard issued a permit to replace 
    the bridge. Replacement cannot be accomplished without closing the 
    bridge span for a period of five months. Closure of the bridge will 
    require maritime traffic to use an alternate route through the outer 
    harbor. Detours of 5 miles are expected; maximum detours of 10 miles 
    may be experienced. The short term costs attributable to these detours 
    are outweighed by the long-term benefits to be gained by the 
    installation of a new bridge likely to provide uninterrupted rail 
    service and timely, reliable openings for waterborne traffic for many 
    years.
        This temporary rule authorizes a five month (150 day) closure of 
    the bridge. This action is necessary both to facilitate replacement of 
    the span and reconstruction of the bridge support towers, as well as to 
    avoid disrupting essential rail service during reconstruction. The 
    SNPRM advertised a closure beginning in November 1996, however, 
    construction is behind schedule and the closure is now scheduled to 
    begin February 1, 1997. In the event that passage through the draw 
    becomes temporarily possible during the effective period 
    notwithstanding construction efforts, the Coast Guard will publish that 
    fact in the Local Notice to Mariners.
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
    of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of 
    potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. It 
    has been exempted from review by the Office of Management and Budget 
    under that order. It is not significant under the Department of 
    Transportation Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11040, 
    February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this 
    rule to be approximately $1 million to waterway users (to detour around 
    the work site) and $2.5 million to the bridge owner (to expedite work). 
    These figures are below the threshold levels requiring a formal 
    Regulatory Evaluation. The draft economic analysis published with the 
    NPRM was superseded by a more detailed economic analysis in the 
    Environmental Impact Statement, which is available in the docket for 
    inspection or copying where indicated under ADDRESSES.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 
    Coast Guard
    
    [[Page 59026]]
    
    must consider whether this rule will have a significant economic impact 
    on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small entities'' may 
    include (1) small businesses and not-for-profit organizations that are 
    independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields 
    and (2) governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
    50,000. The estimated cost to each recreational mariner affected by 
    this regulation is less than $100. The estimated cost per ``small 
    business'' towing company for personnel hours and fuel consumption 
    during detours is less than $100,000. Because the impact of this 
    proposal is expected to be limited and of relatively short duration, 
    the Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that this rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This rule contains no collection of information requirements under 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Federalism
    
        The Coast Guard has analyzed this proposal under the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has determined that 
    this rule does not raise sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environment
    
        The Coast Guard has considered the environmental impact of this 
    rule. The Coast Guard prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 
    for the replacement of this historic bridge. The EIS analyzed the 
    environmental and economic impact of this 5 month bridge closure. The 
    draft Environmental Assessment published with the NPRM has been 
    superseded by the sore detailed environmental analysis in the EIS, 
    which is available in the docket for inspection or copying where 
    indicated under ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
    
        Bridges.
    
    Regulation
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard is 
    amending 33 CFR Part 117 as follows:
    
    PART 117--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 117 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; AND 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); 
    section 117.255 also issued under the authority of Pub. 102-587, 106 
    Stat. 5039.
    
    
    Sec. 117.147  [Amended]
    
        2. Effective February 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997, Sec. 117.147 
    is amended by suspending paragraph (b) and adding a new paragraph (c) 
    to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 117.147  Cerritos Channel
    
    * * * * *
        (c) During the period February 1, 1997 through June 30, 1997, the 
    bridge will be undergoing reconstruction and the draw need not open for 
    the passage of vessels.
    
        Dated: October 28, 1996.
    R.T. Rufe, Jr.,
    Vice Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard 
    District.
    [FR Doc. 96-29690 Filed 11-19-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/30/1997
Published:
11/20/1996
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Temporary final rule.
Document Number:
96-29690
Dates:
This temporary final rule will be effective from February 1 through June 30, 1997.
Pages:
59025-59026 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CGD11-90-03
PDF File:
96-29690.pdf
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 117.147