96-4441. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories: Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Other Processes Subject to the Negotiated Regulation for ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 41 (Thursday, February 29, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 7716-7718]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-4441]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 63
    
    [AD-FRL-5431-2]
    RIN 2060-AC19
    
    
    National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 
    Source Categories: Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Synthetic 
    Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Other Processes Subject to 
    the Negotiated Regulation for Equipment Leaks
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On April 10, 1995, the EPA amended certain portions of the 
    ``National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source 
    Categories: Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Synthetic Organic 
    Chemical Manufacturing Industry and Other Processes Subject to the 
    Negotiated Regulation for Equipment Leaks.'' This rule is commonly 
    known as the Hazardous Organic NESHAP or the HON. In that action, the 
    EPA revised the rule to provide a deferral of HON requirements for 
    source owners or operators who wish to make an area source 
    certification and to establish minimum documentation requirements. This 
    action revises the date for submittal of those area source 
    certifications and clarifies the wording of the documentation 
    requirements. This action is being taken because the EPA has learned 
    that sufficient time was not provided to prepare the certifications and 
    that some confusion exists regarding the required documentation.
        This action also extends the April 22, 1996 deadline for submittal 
    of implementation plans for emission points not included in an 
    emissions average to December 31, 1996. The deadline for submitting 
    these plans is being extended because the EPA anticipates making 
    further revisions to the rule in the near future that could affect the 
    contents of the implementation plan. In light of this, the EPA thinks 
    it is appropriate to delay this report until there is greater certainty 
    regarding the compliance requirements.
    
    DATES: The direct final rule will be effective April 19, 1996, unless 
    significant, adverse comments are received by April 1, 1996. If 
    significant, adverse comments are timely received on any portion of the 
    direct final rule, that portion of the direct final rule will be 
    withdrawn.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted (in duplicate, if possible) to: 
    Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (6102), Attention 
    Docket Number A-90-20, Room M-1500, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, 401 M Street SW., Washington, DC 20460.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Janet S. Meyer, Emission Standards 
    Division (MD-13), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air 
    Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 
    27711, telephone number (919) 541-5254.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If significant adverse comments are timely 
    received on any portion of this direct final rule, that portion of the 
    direct final rule will be withdrawn and all such comments will be 
    addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule 
    contained in the Proposed Rules Section of this Federal Register that 
    is identical to this direct final rule. If no significant adverse 
    comments are timely received on this direct final rule, then the direct 
    final rule will become effective April 19, 1996, and no further action 
    is contemplated on the parallel proposal published today.
    
    I. Background and Summary of Changes to Rule
    
        On April 22, 1994 (59 FR 19402), and June 6, 1994 (59 FR 29196), 
    the EPA promulgated in the Federal Register National Emission Standards 
    for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for 
    
    [[Page 7717]]
    the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI), and for 
    several other processes subject to the equipment leaks portion of the 
    rule. These regulations were promulgated as subparts F, G, H, and I in 
    40 CFR Part 63, and are commonly referred to as the hazardous organic 
    NESHAP, or the HON. Since the April 22, 1994 notice, there have been 
    several amendments to clarify various aspects of the rule. Readers 
    should see the following Federal Register notices for more information: 
    September 20, 1994 (59 FR 48175); October 24, 1994 (59 FR 53359); 
    October 28, 1994 (59 FR 54131); January 27, 1995 (60 FR 5321); April 
    10, 1995 (60 FR 18020); April 10, 1995 (60 FR 18026); and December 12, 
    1995 (60 FR 63624).
    
    A. Area Source Certification
    
        On April 10, 1995, new paragraphs were added to Sec. 63.100(b) and 
    Sec. 63.103(f) of subpart F and Sec. 63.190(b) of subpart I to provide 
    procedures to certify and document that a source is operating below the 
    thresholds for a major source. Those provisions specified that the 
    certifications were to be submitted no later than May 10, 1995. This 
    date was 30 days after the date of publication of the notice and 
    consistent with the proposed requirement. Since the amendment was 
    issued, the EPA has learned that there are a number of potential area 
    source facilities whose owners learned of this amendment for the first 
    time after May 10, 1995. The EPA believes that, in view of these 
    circumstances, it is appropriate to provide additional time for 
    submittal of the certifications. Therefore, this document revises the 
    date for submittal of those certifications until May 14, 1996.
        The EPA has also learned that there are questions regarding the 
    requirements for documentation that actual emissions are below the 
    major source threshold. To address this confusion, the first sentence 
    in Sec. 63.100(b)(4)(i)(B) is being revised to clarify that emissions 
    are to be estimated for maximum expected operating conditions for the 
    facility. This revision is necessary to make the rule consistent with 
    the EPA's intent to allow sources with actual annual emissions less 
    than major source thresholds the additional time necessary to obtain 
    federally enforceable limits (59 FR 53393 and 60 FR 18021). The same 
    revision is also being made to Sec. 63.190(b)(7)(i)(B) of subpart I.
    
    B. Date for Submission of Implementation Plan
    
        The EPA is extending the April 22, 1996 deadline for submittal of 
    implementation plans for emission points not included in an emissions 
    average to December 31, 1996. The deadline for submitting these plans 
    is being extended because there are uncertainties regarding the 
    applicability of the rule to certain sources and there are 
    uncertainties regarding the requirements of certain provisions. These 
    uncertainties are caused by the existence of pending litigation on the 
    final rule, the need to review and respond to several recent changes to 
    the final rule, and the possibility of further changes being made to 
    the final rule in the near future.
        Since the April 22, 1994 notice, there have been several amendments 
    to clarify various aspects of the rule. The most recent of these 
    notices was published on December 12, 1995. On April 10, 1995 (60 FR 
    18071), the EPA proposed to remove three compounds from the list of 
    chemical production processes regulated by the rule. The EPA 
    anticipates issuing a final notice to complete that rulemaking in the 
    near future. Additionally, the EPA anticipates that it is likely to 
    propose at least one more set of additional changes to the rule in the 
    near future. Since these changes may affect compliance planning for 
    some sources, it is appropriate to delay this report until there is 
    greater certainty regarding the compliance requirements.
    
    II. Administrative
    
    A. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The information collection requirements of the previously 
    promulgated NESHAP were submitted to and approved by the Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB). A copy of this Information Collection 
    Request (ICR) document (OMB control number 1414.02) may be obtained 
    from Sandy Farmer, Information Policy Branch (PM-223Y); U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency; 401 M Street, SW; Washington, DC 20460 
    or by calling (202) 260-2740.
        Today's changes to the NESHAP should have no impact on the 
    information collection burden estimates made previously. The change to 
    the area source certification merely revises the date for submission of 
    the certification and clarifies the documentation requirements. The 
    change to the implementation plan requirements merely extends the date 
    for submission of plans from existing sources. These changes do not 
    impose new requirements. Consequently, the ICR has not been revised.
    
    B. Executive Order 12866 Review
    
        Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, the EPA must determine whether 
    the proposed regulatory action is ``not significant'' and therefore, 
    subject to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and the 
    requirements of the Executive Order. The Order defines ``significant'' 
    regulatory action as one that is likely to lead to a rule that may:
        (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
    adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
    economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
    health or safety in State, local, or tribal governments or communities;
        (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
    action taken or planned by another agency;
        (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
    user fees or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
    thereof; or
        (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
    mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
    the Executive Order.
        The HON rule promulgated on April 22, 1994 was considered 
    ``significant'' under Executive Order 12866 and a regulatory impact 
    analysis (RIA) was prepared. The amendments issued today clarify the 
    rule and do not add any additional control requirements. Therefore, 
    this regulatory action is considered not significant.
    
    C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 requires the identification 
    of potentially adverse impacts of Federal regulations upon small 
    business entities. The Act specifically requires the completion of a 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis in those instances where small business 
    impacts are possible. Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the Administrator certifies that this 
    rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities. Because this rulemaking imposes no adverse 
    economic impacts, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been 
    prepared.
    
    D. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 
    (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), the EPA must prepare a budgetary impact 
    statement to accompany any proposed or final rule that includes a 
    Federal mandate that may result in estimated 
    
    [[Page 7718]]
    costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to 
    the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, the EPA 
    must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative 
    that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with 
    statutory requirements. Section 203 requires the EPA to establish a 
    plan for informing and advising any small governments that may be 
    significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
        The EPA has determined that the action promulgated today does not 
    include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 
    million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the 
    aggregate, or to the private sector. Therefore, the requirements of the 
    Unfunded Mandates Act do not apply to this action.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous 
    substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: February 21, 1996.
    Carol M. Browner,
    Administrator.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 40, chapter I, part 
    63, subparts F, G, and I, of the Code of Federal Regulations are 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 63--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
    
    Subpart F--National Emission Standards for Organic Hazardous Air 
    Pollutants From the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 
    Industry
    
        2. Section 63.100 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(4) 
    introductory text and the first sentence in paragraph (b)(4)(i)(B) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 63.100  Applicability and designation of source.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (4) The owner or operator of a chemical manufacturing processing 
    unit is exempt from all requirements of subparts F, G, and H of this 
    part until not later than April 22, 1997 if the owner or operator 
    certifies, in a notification to the appropriate EPA Regional Office, 
    not later than May 14, 1996, that the plant site at which the chemical 
    manufacturing processing unit is located emits, and will continue to 
    emit, during any 12-month period, less than 10 tons per year of any 
    individual hazardous air pollutants (HAP), and less than 25 tons per 
    year of any combination of HAP.
        (i) * * *
        (B) The owner or operator shall calculate the amount of annual HAP 
    emissions released from each emission point at the plant site, using 
    acceptable measurement or estimating techniques for maximum expected 
    operating conditions at the plant site. * * *
    * * * * *
    
    Subpart G--National Emission Standards for Organic Hazardous Air 
    Pollutants From the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing 
    Industry for Process Vents, Storage Vessels, Transfer Operations, 
    and Wastewater
    
        3. Section 63.151 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(1)(ii) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 63.151  Initial notification and implementation plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (ii) Each owner or operator of an existing source subject to this 
    subpart who elects to comply with Sec. 63.112 of this subpart by 
    complying with the provisions of Secs. 63.113 to 63.148 of this 
    subpart, rather than emissions averaging, for any emission points, and 
    who has not submitted an operating permit application accompanied by 
    the information specified in Sec. 63.152(e) by December 31,1996, shall 
    develop an Implementation Plan. For an existing source, the 
    Implementation Plan for those emission points that are not to be 
    included in an emissions average shall be submitted to the 
    Administrator no later than December 31, 1996.
    * * * * *
    
    Subpart I--National Emission Standards for Organic Hazardous Air 
    Pollutants for Certain Processes Subject to the Negotiated 
    Regulation for Equipment Leaks
    
        4. Section 63.190 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(7) 
    introductory text and the first sentence in paragraph (b)(7)(i)(B) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 63.190  Applicability and designation of source.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (7) The owner or operator of a plant site at which a process 
    specified in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) of this section is 
    located is exempt from all requirements of this subpart I until not 
    later than April 22, 1997 if the owner or operator certifies, in a 
    notification to the appropriate EPA Regional Office, not later than May 
    14, 1996, that the plant site at which the process is located emits, 
    and will continue to emit, during any 12-month period, less than 10 
    tons per year of any individual HAP, and less than 25 tons per year of 
    any combination of HAP.
        (i) * * *
        (B) The owner or operator shall calculate the amount of annual HAP 
    emissions released from each emission point at the plant site, using 
    acceptable measurement or estimating techniques for maximum expected 
    operating conditions at the plant site. * * *
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 96-4441 Filed 2-28-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/19/1996
Published:
02/29/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
96-4441
Dates:
The direct final rule will be effective April 19, 1996, unless significant, adverse comments are received by April 1, 1996. If significant, adverse comments are timely received on any portion of the direct final rule, that portion of the direct final rule will be withdrawn.
Pages:
7716-7718 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
AD-FRL-5431-2
RINs:
2060-AC19
PDF File:
96-4441.pdf
CFR: (4)
40 CFR 63.103(f)
40 CFR 63.100
40 CFR 63.151
40 CFR 63.190