[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23894-23910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-11230]
[[Page 23893]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part III
Department of Transportation
_______________________________________________________________________
Coast Guard
_______________________________________________________________________
46 CFR Parts 108, 110, 111, 112, 113, and 161
Electrical Engineering Requirements for Merchant Vessels; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 1997 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 23894]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 108, 110, 111, 112, 113, and 161
[CGD 94-108]
RIN 2115-AF24
Electrical Engineering Requirements for Merchant Vessels
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of the President's Regulatory Reinvention Initiative,
the Coast Guard is amending its electrical engineering regulations to
reduce the regulatory burden on the marine industry, purge obsolete and
out-of-date regulations, and eliminate requirements that create an
unwarranted differential between domestic rules and international
standards. This rulemaking harmonizes, where possible, the electrical
engineering regulations with recent amendments to the International
Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, as amended.
Additionally, this rulemaking dramatically revises certain prescriptive
electrical equipment design, specification, and approval requirements
and replaces them with performance-based requirements that incorporate
international standards.
DATES: This final rule is effective June 16, 1997. The incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register on June 16, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Documents as indicated in this preamble are available for
inspection or copying at the office of the Executive Secretary, Marine
Safety Council (G-LRA/3406), U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second
Street SW., room 3406, Washington, DC 20593-0001, between 9:30 a.m. and
2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-267-1477.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laura Hamman, Project Manager,
Office of Design and Engineering Standards (G-MSE), 202-267-2206.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
On February 2, 1996, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ``Electrical Engineering Requirements for
Merchant Vessels'' in the Federal Register (61 FR 4132). There were two
correction notices published for the NPRM on February 23, 1996 (61 FR
7050), and March 5, 1996 (61 FR 8539). The Coast Guard received 45
letters commenting on the proposal. As a result of requests from a
national trade association, a notice was published on February 26, 1996
(61 FR 7090), extending the comment period from March 18, 1996, to
April 2, 1996, and announcing a public meeting on March 25, 1996. Over
20 persons attended the meeting and 9 commented on the NPRM. A
recording and summary of the meeting are in the rulemaking docket. On
June 4, 1996, the Coast Guard published an interim rule in the Federal
Register (61 FR 28260).
Correction notices were published on June 26, 1996 (61 FR 33045),
July 3, 1996 (61 FR 34927), July 11, 1996 (61 FR 36608), July 12, 1996
(61 FR 36786), July 30, 1996 (61 FR 39695), and September 23, 1996 (61
FR 49691), in the Federal Register. Also, the Coast Guard published a
notice of policy on October 4, 1996 (61 FR 51789), in the Federal
Register. The Coast Guard received 30 letters commenting on the interim
rule. No public meeting was requested, and none was held.
Drafting Information
The principal persons involved in drafting this document are Mr.
Gerald P. Miante, Office of Design and Engineering (G-MSE-3), and Mr.
Stephen H. Barber, Project Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel.
Purpose
Under the authorities cited in the ``Authority'' section for each
part amended, the Coast Guard is amending its electrical engineering
and equipment regulations for certain Coast Guard-inspected vessels in
46 CFR chapter I, subchapters I-A, J, and Q to accomplish the
following:
(1) To reduce the regulatory burden on the marine industry by
eliminating obsolete and unnecessary regulations and by clarifying the
remaining ones. This objective is consistent with the President's
Regulatory Reinvention Initiative and the Coast Guard's regulatory
reform program.
(2) To replace, where appropriate, requirements that are
prescriptive in nature with performance-based requirements that
incorporate national or international standards and allow increased
flexibility for small businesses.
(3) To eliminate requirements that create an unwarranted
differential between domestic rules and international standards. This
rulemaking harmonizes, where possible, the electrical engineering
regulations with amendments to the International Convention for the
Safety of Life at Sea, 1974, (SOLAS 74) since the electrical
engineering regulations were last revised in 1982.
(4) To address comments received from the marine industry and from
Coast Guard field and inspection offices.
This rulemaking is intended to serve the needs of industry while
maintaining a comparable level of safety.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The following is a summary of the comments received and the changes
made to the regulatory text since the interim rule was published. The
items are grouped first by those that address a general issue, then by
those that relate to a specific provision in the text.
I. General Comments.
(1) Several comments congratulated the Coast Guard for its revision
of subchapter J which offers the manufacturers more flexibility,
increases clarity of the regulations and enhances safety of U.S. flag
vessels. It was observed that the revision process reflects a lot of
``hard work and good common sense.''
(2) As in response to the NPRM, a number of comments recommended
changes that may require further consideration by the Coast Guard.
Several comments recommended that certain other standards be referenced
in the regulations as replacements for, or options to, those cited in
the interim rule. However, not all changes could be incorporated at
this final rule stage, due to the complexity of the requests or the
necessity to allow the public an opportunity to comment on new
requirements. Several additional standards for incorporation by
reference are included in this final rule.
The Coast Guard has a long-range plan to broaden the use of
acceptable standards. Until those standards are incorporated into the
regulations, any vessel owner or operator who desires to employ a
fitting, material, apparatus, equipment, or arrangement other than that
required by this subchapter may submit a request using the equivalency
provision in Sec. 110.20-1.
Items the Coast Guard may consider for a subsequent rulemaking
include--
(a) Incorporation of the new Institute of Electronic and Electrical
Engineers (IEEE) Std 45, when approved by the IEEE standards board and
published;
(b) Addition of a requirement that all manufacturer's conducting
self-certification should be International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) 9001 registered;
[[Page 23895]]
(c) Incorporation of performance-based inclination criteria into
Sec. 111.01-19;
(d) Consideration of requirements for high impedance grounding
systems to be added to Sec. 111.05-19;
(e) Establishing a new subpart that would address the necessary
supply of clean, uninterrupted power for modern AC-powered, solid-state
equipment, which would complement the requirements of Secs. 111.15-3
and 111.20-1;
(f) Addition of a ventilation alarm requirement to Sec.
111.35-1.
(g) Prohibition of screw-in, porcelain or glass-cap fuses in
subpart 111.53;
(h) Incorporation of new standards that provide guidance for high
voltage cable in Sec. 111.60-1(e);
(i) Incorporation of the Canadian Standards Association
(CSA) flame test CSA FT-4 either as another option or in place of
American National Standards Institute/Underwriters Laboratories (ANSI/
UL) 1581 test VW-1 in Secs. 111.60-2 and 111.30-19(b)(4);
(j) Incorporation of Underwriters Laboratories (UL) 2225 into
Sec. 111.60-23(h) to provide guidance on the use of metal-clad (Type
MC) cable in hazardous (classified) locations;
(k) Incorporation of Illuminating Engineers Society
(IES) Recommended Practice (RP) 12 for marine lighting in Sec.
111.75-15(c);
(l) Permission of third-party testing for lighting, appliances, oil
immersion heaters, and electric heaters in Secs. 111.75-20, 111.85-1,
and 111.87-3;
(m) Incorporation of International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) 1892 in Sec. 111.105-5 for electrical
installations aboard mobile offshore drilling units (MODU's) and
floating platforms;
(n) Incorporation of pump room ventilation and monitoring
requirements of American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), Rules for Building
and Classing Steel Vessels, section 4/5.151.6 into Sec. 111.105-31;
(o) Replacing IEC 332-3, Category A flame test with IEC 332-3,
Category A/F in Sec. 111.107-1;
(p) Restricting the color red for general emergency or fire alarms
only in Sec. 113.25-10;
(q) Application of the cable routing and fire testing requirement
of Sec. 113.30-25(i) to all safety related circuits in part 113;
(r) Incorporation of additional requirements in Sec.
113.50-20 to align the regulations with the International Maritime
Organization (IMO) Code of Alarms and Indicators; nd
(s) Establishing a new subpart 113.70 for gas detection systems.
(3) A number of comments commended the Coast Guard's effort to
streamline its electrical regulations and incorporate industry
standards, both domestic and international.
Consistent with the President's Regulatory Reinvention Initiative,
the Coast Guard is taking this approach in all its rulemaking projects.
(4) Two comments voiced several specific concerns and requested
extending the effective date of the interim rule by six months to allow
the U.S. shipbuilding community an opportunity to compile detailed
comments and suggestions regarding the change. Additionally, the
comment specified major concerns relating to degree of protection
requirements for enclosures, ambient temperatures for equipment, ground
detection regulation, and marine battery installations.
In response, the Coast Guard, after a detailed analysis of these
concerns, determined that the extension of the comment period was
unnecessary. In response to the comment's specific concerns and until
this final rule could be finalized, the Coast Guard published a notice
of policy for interim rule (61 FR 51789; October 4, 1996). This policy
notice pointed out that persons wishing to apply a provision from the
1996 draft of IEEE Std 45 or the 1996 ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Steel Vessels instead of a provision in the interim rule could
submit, for approval on a case-by-case basis, a request under the
equivalency provisions in the interim rule.
(5) One comment requested clarification on what standards are
approved for incorporation by reference and who determines if a
standard is approved.
The Coast Guard determines which standards are acceptable for
incorporation by reference. In order to use a system arrangement or
individual piece of equipment that does not meet the standards
incorporated by reference or the specific requirements in this
subchapter, a request may be submitted under the equivalency provision
of Sec. 110.20-1. Requests under the equivalency provision will be
considered at the time a specific system design is submitted to the
Coast Guard for plan review and may be accepted as part of the system
plan approval.
(6) Several comments indicated that, contrary to the Coast Guard's
intentions, the interim rule significantly increases the cost of doing
business internationally for U.S. shipyards. They expressed concern
that equipment protection, temperature, and operational characteristic
requirements have been increased beyond conventional practice. Due to
this perceived increase in requirements, the comments stated that
electrical equipment might require extensive additional testing to
demonstrate operability. These comments also noted that the
requirements for alarm, indicating and internal communications systems
have been greatly expanded. Finally, the comments pointed out that the
interim rule invokes requirements that did not previously exist and are
not found in trade literature. The comments' specific concerns are
addressed in the discussion of comments for the relative section.
Generally, however, the perceived increases and changes to the
requirements in the final rule are actually a harmonization of the
Coast Guard's electrical engineering requirements with classification
society (ABS) and international (IEC) performance-based standards.
(7) One comment expressed concern that the Coast Guard is heavily
reliant on ABS Rules when the ABS Rules may not be aligned with the
requirements of the International Association of Classification
Societies (IACS) Member Societies. Also, the comment expressed concern
that the regulations unfairly forced Member Societies to follow ABS
requirements for vessels operating in U.S. waters.
The Coast Guard has traditionally incorporated by reference various
sections of ABS Rules into its electrical engineering regulations. This
rule expands on the use of ABS Rules as an option or alternative to
prescriptive requirements. However, the incorporation by reference of
specific ABS rules does not preclude the use of other rules approved
for specific applications under the equivalency provisions in
Sec. 110.20-1.
Additionally, port state control inspections are performed mainly
to determine compliance with SOLAS 74 and some related Coast Guard
regulations. The requirements of subchapter J and its referenced
material apply to Coast Guard-certificated, U.S.-flag vessels only and
are not generally applicable to foreign vessels, unless specified
elsewhere in Coast Guard regulations.
(8) One comment recommended incorporating more performance-based
standards and more Coast Guard policies to reduce the number of
requests seeking equivalency determinations under these regulations.
The comment expressed belief that adherence to performance standards
[[Page 23896]]
will foster greater innovation and improved overall safety.
Throughout the regulation, the Coast Guard has incorporated,
wherever possible, a significant number of additional industry
standards, both domestic and international. Time and resource
limitations prevent the inclusion of every applicable standard. The
allowance of equivalencies would permit the inclusion of appropriate
standards that the Coast Guard has yet to review. This practice does
foster innovation and is consistent with the Coast Guard's intention to
serve the needs of industry while maintaining a comparable level of
safety.
(9) Several comments pointed out that, at the time of the
publication of the interim rule, which incorporated the 1995 ABS Rules
for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, ABS had already published the
1996 edition of these rules.
The text of this final rule incorporates the ABS Rules for Building
and Classing Steel Vessels, 1996 edition. ABS updated section 4/5 of
the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels by incorporating
international requirements and, at the same time, reorganized the
section into a more user-friendly format by dividing it into parts and
renumbering the paragraphs.
II. Comments to Specific Sections
Section 110.01-3. (1) Now that the rule is finalized, the option of
complying with regulations in effect at the time the alterations or
modifications are made has been removed from paragraph (b). Compliance
with this regulation is now mandatory.
(2) Paragraph (c) has been amended to better define the term
``conversion.''
Section 110.10-1. (1) One comment suggested incorporating by
reference IEEE Recommended Practice on Surge Voltages in Low-Voltage AC
Power Circuits (IEEE Std 62.41-1991); UL 1449, Standard for Transient
Voltage Surge Suppressors; and UL 1778, Standard for Uninterruptable
Power Supply Equipment.
These standards apply to uninterruptable power supplies (UPS) which
are not presently addressed in these regulations. While the value of
these standards are realized and their use is not prohibited by these
regulations, the Coast Guard will not include specific provisions or
requirements on this subject in this rule without allowing an
opportunity for public comment.
(2) One comment suggested that American Petroleum Institute (API)
Recommended Practices (RP) should not be incorporated into these
regulations because they set forth domestic practices for fixed
platform and shoreside facilities and do not reflect international
consensus for vessels. It was suggested to consider incorporation of
IEC 1892, which is presently under development at an international
level.
The Coast Guard agrees and is awaiting the publication of the IEC
standard for review. The Coast Guard may consider IEC 1892 in a
subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to
comment. Until its publication, subchapter I-A, subparts 111.105 and
111.107, of this chapter and Coast Guard policy provide guidance for
MODU's and other Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) vessels.
Section 110.15-1. (1) One comment recommended that the definition
of ``independent laboratory'' be changed to clarify that the
certification may not be performed in the absence of listing.
The intent of the definition is to ensure that testing must always
be performed but also recognizes that laboratories vary in the
terminology of promulgating successful results. Certain laboratories
``list'' products; other laboratories ``certify'' that products meet
certain standards.
(2) One comment suggested that the requirement for watertight
enclosures of National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) Type
6 or 6P is excessive and suggested that NEMA Type 4 or 4X most closely
matches the IEEE Std 45 definition of watertight and exceeds the
definition of waterproof.
The Coast Guard agrees and the definitions of ``watertight'' and
``waterproof'' have been revised in accordance with IEEE 100. Examples
of industry accepted minimum degrees of protection requirements are
included.
(3) One comment stated that the increase in the degree of
protection requirements for ``dripproof'' to IEC ingress protection
(IP) 32 will cause manufacturers to redesign electrical installations
aboard vessels; and IEC IP 22 is acceptable as the current industry
standard. Additionally, the comment recommended reinstating NEMA 250
Type 12 in this category.
The Coast Guard agrees with all the recommendations and the
definition of ``dripproof'' has been revised accordingly.
Section 110.25-1. (1) One comment recommended adding wording to
paragraph (i)(6) to clarify that, when required by the standard, proof
of listing and certification must also be submitted. This change would
align the regulatory language with the note to the same section.
Paragraph (i)(6) has been revised accordingly.
(2) Several comments suggested that, in the note to paragraph (n),
items required to meet an industry standard should only be certified by
an independent laboratory approved by the Commandant, and not simply
self-certified by the manufacturer. One comment pointed out that
elimination of this requirement would result in inferior equipment
severely jeopardizing shipboard safety. The comment suggests that at a
bare minimum any manufacturer conducting self-certification should be
ISO 9001 registered, which requires third-party evaluation of the
manufacturer's quality program.
Before the recent revisions of subchapter J, the regulation in this
area required proof of listing only for equipment required to meet UL
standards; manufacturer's self-certification was allowed for other
standards such as IEEE, NEMA, and ANSI. The interim rule modified this
requirement by consolidating UL into the latter group. The Coast Guard
may consider requiring manufacturers, who wish to self-certify, to be
ISO 9001-registered in a subsequent rulemaking where the public will
have an opportunity to comment.
(3) One comment recommended removing from paragraph (c) Marine
Safety Center (MSC) review of components to expedite review and
eliminate redundant review by the MSC and the Officer in Charge, Marine
Inspection (OCMI). The comment states that the certificate of
inspection is a better measure of safety.
The inspection for certification of a vessel cannot be conducted at
the component level for most systems. The Coast Guard has a long-
standing policy to allow plan review by third parties, such as
professional engineers and ABS, with oversight functions distributed
between the MSC and OCMI. The Coast Guard continues to find component
verification by the MSC necessary for these essential systems.
Section 111.01-1. One comment suggested adding wording to prohibit
the use of combustible materials in the construction of electrical
equipment, for example, enclosures and foundations.
It is Coast Guard policy, which is congruent with SOLAS 74,
Regulations II-2/34 and 49, to avoid the unnecessary use of combustible
materials. Therefore, new paragraph (b) has been added to this section.
Section 111.01-9. (1) Several comments noted that, in paragraphs
(a) and (c), IEC IP 32 is an unduly severe degree of protection instead
of a NEMA 250 Type 2 enclosure and that IEC IP 22
[[Page 23897]]
is acceptable as the current industry standard.
The Coast Guard agrees and has revised paragraphs (a) and (c)
accordingly.
(2) Several comments suggested that the Coast Guard incorporate by
reference table 4/5B.1 of the 1996 ABS Rules for Building and Classing
Steel Vessels as acceptable minimum degrees of protection.
This table has been added to paragraph (b) and to the note to this
section.
(3) Several comments pointed out that the degree of protection
requirements NEMA 250 Type 6 or 6P and IEC IP 67 are too severe to be
designated as ``watertight''.
The Coast Guard agrees and has revised the requirement to be NEMA
250 Type 4 or 4X and IEC IP 56 in paragraph (b) of this section and
wherever the watertight requirement appears in part 113 of this
chapter.
(4) One comment suggested that an addition be made to these
regulations to avoid the possibility that the National Electrical Code
(NEC) requirements for land-based equipment near seashores might exceed
requirements in this subchapter.
This subchapter addresses Coast Guard certificated vessels. Land-
based electrical installations fall under different standards and are
not subject to this subchapter. The Coast Guard is not responsible for
the development of NEC requirements.
Section 111.01-15. (1) Several comments pointed out that, in
paragraph (c), circuit breakers be allowed to be rated at 40 deg.C
instead of 45 deg.C because this is in accordance with marine circuit
breakers covered in UL 489, supplement SA incorporated into
Sec. 111.54-1(b) of this chapter. This would not preclude the option of
using 50 deg.C Navy type circuit breakers.
Paragraph (c) has been revised accordingly.
(2) One comment suggested that requiring a 55 deg.C rating for all
control and instrumentation equipment will cause manufacturers to
recertify and redesign equipment.
The increase to 55 deg.C rating for these critical circuit
elements is in harmony with ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel
Vessels, table 4/11.1, IEC 68, and IEC 92-101, table 4. Therefore, the
requirement is retained.
(3) One comment noted that an ambient temperature of 40 deg.C
differs with the generally accepted IACS and IEC temperature of 45
deg.C.
The Coast Guard has accepted 40 deg.C electrical equipment with
specific exceptions in areas of special concern as noted in this
section.
Section 111.01-17. One comment noted that the regulations establish
new requirements and vendor testing to demonstrate operability.
These requirements conform to the international standard IEC 92-101
and 1996 ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, table 4/
5.1.
Section 111.01-19. (1) One comment suggested that if the Coast
Guard were to provide a performance-based inclination criteria, the
result would be the elimination of equivalency determinations
applicable to any single class of vessel.
No performance criteria were submitted in response to the interim
rule; however, the Coast Guard may consider any performance criteria
submitted for incorporation into a subsequent rulemaking.
(2) One comment recommended changing the wording to exclude certain
items, such as dishwashers, toasters, and coffee makers, that are not
necessary to the maneuvering and safety of the vessel.
This section has been revised to apply these requirements to
critical equipment and systems.
(3) One comment stated that the new requirements, which ensure that
all electrical equipment is operable under certain extreme conditions
of list, roll, and trim, will result in greater expense due to the
installation of new equipment requiring additional tests.
Although this section has been revised to apply to critical
systems, the inclination requirements are consistent with IEC 92-101,
table 3.
Section 111.05-7. (1) One comment noted that this section is
redundant to Sec. 111.60-5.
This section is retained because of its specific reference to
armored cable and grounding.
(2) One comment recommended removing the reference to IEC 92-3
because this standard does not address installation guidance for armor
and sheathing.
The reference to IEC 92-3 is retained because several sections of
Part 3 of the IEC publication, such as clauses 10.18 and 11.14, provide
guidance for metallic armor and sheathing.
Section 111.05-9. One comment recommended incorporating the
American Boat and Yacht Council (ABYC) Standard E4 on lightning
protection.
The Coast Guard agrees that guidance is appropriate for lightning
protection. The Coast Guard is incorporating the international standard
IEC 92-401, Electrical Installations in Ships; Part 401: Installation
and test of completed installation, section 10, Lightning Conductors.
Section 111.05-19. One comment recommended additions to the
regulation for permitting high-impedance grounding schemes on all
vessels with a distribution voltage greater than 1,000 volts a.c. as
this method becomes an important tool for circuit protection, fault
coordination, and the limitation of equipment damage.
While the value of this practice is realized and its use is not
prohibited by these regulations, the Coast Guard will not include
specific provisions or requirements on this subject in a final rule
without allowing an opportunity for public comment. However, this final
rule references this grounding method in Secs. 111.05-19 and 111.05-27.
Section 111.05-23. (1) One comment suggested allowing either the
ground detecting equipment or an alarm signal from the detecting
equipment to be installed at the distribution switchboard via a control
cable instead of bringing back a phase conductor to the main
distribution switchboard. Also, the comment points out that allowing
the detection equipment to remain near the transformer would also make
it available for local troubleshooting.
While this is the intent of paragraph (d), a note has been added to
the paragraph for clarification.
(2) One comment recommended that paragraph (d) should be revised to
include only isolation devices greater than 10 kVA.
Paragraph (d) has been revised to specify ``feeder'' circuits,
regardless of the load.
(3) One comment suggested that the increase in the required number
of ground detector lights will have a great impact on the cost and
space.
The revisions to paragraph (d) discussed previously should address
the concern of this comment by reducing the number of circuits
monitored and method of monitoring.
Section 111.05-27. One comment stated that the requirement to
momentarily remove the indicating device is overly prescriptive and
recommended a more performance-based requirement to permit new
technology.
The section has been revised to clarify intent.
Section 111.05-33. (1) Several comments suggested revising this
section to clarify safety grounds (bonding) versus system grounds so
the language is technically accurate.
This section has been revised accordingly.
[[Page 23898]]
(2) Several comments noted that clarification is necessary in
paragraph (b) to exclude ``system'' ground conductors which are
required by Coast Guard policy to be equal in size to the current
carrying conductors.
Paragraph (b) has been revised accordingly.
(3) One comment recommended revising the requirement to allow cable
armor and Type MC cable sheath as a grounding conductor as long as the
cable is third-party tested and listed (with its terminators) as
approved for this application.
Coast Guard historically has prohibited the use of marine shipboard
cable braided armor or metallic sheath as the grounding conductor. Type
MC cable installation is required to be in accordance with the NEC as
stated in Sec. 111.60-23 of this chapter.
Section 111.10-1. One comment requested a definition for the term
``auxiliary propulsion'' since certain types of thrusters are designed
for use as ``take-home'' propulsive devices and thrusters are
specifically excluded from paragraph (a).
The term ``auxiliary propulsion'' is revised to read ``propulsion
auxiliary'' to clarify that the intended machinery includes items such
as fuel oil service pumps, lube oil service pumps, purifiers, engine
sea water and fresh water cooling pumps, and air ejection equipment.
Non-conventional systems must be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to
consider such a thruster or ``take-home'' motor in a systems
relationship with the power generating equipment capacity.
Section 111.10-9. One comment stated that propulsion and vessel
control are the critical components of the specified loads. The comment
noted that absent these systems, and given the ability of many safety
systems to operate in the absence of distributed electric power, the
additional redundancy and expense of two independent transformers is
not justified.
Most vessels rely on distributed electric power for system
operation. Plans for any non-conventional system which does not rely on
power from the transformers may be submitted for review in accordance
with Sec. 110.20-1.
Section 111.12-1. (1) One comment suggested that the Coast Guard
accept other major classification societies besides ABS to eliminate
differential between domestic rules and international standards.
According to the comment, ABS Rules create a burden on equipment
manufacturers with additional ``type-testing.''
The Coast Guard has traditionally incorporated by reference various
sections of ABS Rules into its electrical engineering regulations. This
rule expands on the use of ABS Rules as an option or alternative to
Coast Guard prescriptive requirements. However, the incorporation by
reference of specific ABS rules does not preclude the use of other
rules approved for specific applications under the equivalency
provisions in Sec. 110.20-1, whereby the Coast Guard can consider
alternative ``type-testing.''
Since ABS is a member of IACS and has recently revised its
electrical section 4/5 (section 4/3 of the ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling Units) to incorporate many IEC
practices, the Coast Guard considers prime movers meeting these
sections to be aligned with international standards.
(2) One comment noted that neither Coast Guard regulations nor ABS
Rules provide for automatic shutdown of a diesel generator's prime
mover upon failure of that engine's pressure lubrication system.
The requirement in paragraph (c) of this section is retained
because, in addition to being sound engineering practice, table 4/11.10
of the 1996 ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels provides
for automatic shutdown of diesel, steam, and gas turbine prime movers
upon low lube oil inlet pressure to that engine as well as to the
bearings of the electrical generator.
Section 111.12-11. One comment recommended adding a new item to
paragraph (c) which would require the circuit breaker for a generator
to open upon the shutting down of the prime mover. This is a safety
feature required by ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels,
1996, section 4/5A5.3.1.
The inclusion of a low-voltage trip element, activated upon the
shutting down of the prime mover, has always been a feature on
generator circuit breakers and in the provisions of ABS Rules; however,
this requirement has been absent from Coast Guard regulations.
It is now added in new paragraph (c)(1).
Section 111.15-2. (1) One comment noted that the requirements of
this section will cause the U.S. marine industry to use specialized,
more expensive batteries. Also, the addition of a special nameplate
will increase costs.
The Coast Guard utilizes regulations, incorporating Classification
Society Rules and standards, to ensure that equipment aboard
certificated vessels is suitable for the environment and the purpose
for which it is installed. This is particularly applicable to equipment
used in cases of emergency. Labeling of the product by the manufacturer
to attest to certain conditions is a cost effective method of
presenting this information to shipowners, operators, crew, and
inspectors.
(2) One comment recommended the use of a more performance-based
standard instead of the specific requirements in paragraph (a).
Performance standards would preclude the necessity for equivalency
determinations for column stabilized units, surface effects vessels,
etc.
The requirement of 40 degrees of inclination is consistent with IEC
92-101 and 92-305. Although a parameter for use of accumulator
batteries in ships, a unit designed for the environmental conditions of
marine installation should include this feature. The use of an
accumulator battery that does not meet this parameter may be requested
under the equivalency provision of Sec. 110.20-1. Submissions under the
equivalency provision will be considered at the time a specific system
design is submitted to the Coast Guard for plan review and may be
accepted as part of the system plan approval.
Section 111.15-3. One comment suggested the addition of a three
pole disconnect switch located in the battery compartment of large
battery installation with a nominal voltage of higher than 120 volts
for use during servicing.
This comment applies mainly to a large amount of cells for use with
uninterruptable power supply units and may be considered for inclusion
into a subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity
to comment.
Section 111.15-5. (1) One comment noted that, in paragraph (c),
batteries are allowed in confined spaces if the batteries are sealed.
The comment recommended that no batteries, sealed or otherwise, should
be situated in confined areas because these units are only ``sealed''
if everything is normal and may vent as much as standard cells under
abnormal conditions.
Paragraph (c) has been revised accordingly.
(2) One comment suggested that, in paragraph (e), it is sufficient
for a battery to have indication of manufacturer and type number on the
battery with documentation available to support the ampacity,
construction, and specific gravity requirements.
Battery documentation is usually obscure and unavailable for
service personnel and inspectors and labeling is considered necessary
for maintenance and inspection.
[[Page 23899]]
Section 111.15-20. One comment recommended that, if the Coast Guard
is going to specify ampacity considerations, then it should also
specify a voltage drop in the criteria for cable sizing.
Paragraph (c) has been revised to include the words ``while
maintaining the proper voltage at the load end.''
Section 111.15-30. One comment indicated that the purpose of this
section is unclear and appears to be directed at a unique situation.
The purpose of this section is to ensure that, from a systems
engineering perspective, battery installations and their chargers are
compatible. It also cautions against the use of some portable battery
chargers which may impose an unintentional ground of the vessel's power
supply system. Section 111.15-30 is retained.
Section 111.20-1. (1) One comment suggested revising the
requirement to allow only transformers rated at less than 500 VA to be
installed in an enclosure as an alternative to the winding being
inherently resistant to moisture, sea atmosphere, and oil vapor. It
reasons that the long term integrity of enclosures for larger,
permanently fixed transformers may not survive the life cycle of the
vessel.
This section is retained because it offers alternatives for this
equipment. Should the enclosure choice be selected, design, plan
review, installation, and inspection must all show suitability for
environmental conditions and applicability to the system in which it is
used.
(2) One comment recommended revising the provision to allow an
exception for inherently current limiting ferro-resonant transformers
which are incorporated in a device meeting UL 1778.
The Coast Guard determined that this equipment is for specific use
and uninterruptable power supplies. As stated previously,
uninterruptable power supplies will be addressed in the next revision
of the electrical engineering regulations. Until that time, use of
uninterruptable power supply systems are not specifically prohibited by
these regulations, and their usage is subject to the normal plan review
and inspection process.
Section 111.30-5. (1) One comment noted that IEC 92-302 and 92-503
do not define low and medium voltages but refer to voltage ranges. Only
IEEE defines the terms.
Paragraph (a) has been revised accordingly.
(2) One comment suggested moving paragraph (b) to Sec. 111.01-9,
Degrees of protection.
Paragraph (b) specifically addresses dripping and falling
substances, whereas, Sec. 111.01-9 addresses the universal enclosure
requirements as outlined in the referenced standards.
Sections 111.30-9, 111.30-11, and 111.30-13. One comment
recommended that the provisions of these sections be reinstated. The
comment suggests that these operational safety standards should be set
as clear Coast Guard standards. The comment expressed a concern that if
a crew member were to remove an insulated floor matting or grating for
cosmetic reasons, the potential threat to safety would not be in
violation to any clear cut Coast Guard requirement; only a violation to
an obscure reference in a secondary document which might not be aboard
the vessel.
The features described in the previously removed Secs. 111.30-9
(doors and non-conducting handrails) and 111.30-13 (grounding of
switchboard instrumentation) are all construction features to be
installed by the manufacturer in accordance with applicable standards.
In reference to previously removed Sec. 111.30-11 (mats or gratings),
the Coast Guard agrees that this is an important operational safety
concern and that specific guidance is warranted. The reinstated
performance-based requirement reflects international standards.
Section 111.30-19. (1) One comment suggested adding punctuation to
paragraph (b)(3) to clearly distinguish between switchboard wire and
instrumentation wire.
Paragraph (b)(3) has been revised accordingly.
(2) Several comments indicated that paragraph (b)(6) and
Sec. 111.60-11, paragraph (d) cross-reference each other for
switchboard wiring and leave the requirements for switchboard wiring
undefined.
The requirements for switchboard wiring are found in paragraph (b)
and its referenced standard. The cross-reference to Sec. 111.60-11 was
unnecessary and has been removed.
(3) One comment recommended changing the wire size in paragraph
(b)(3) to #18 AWG to align with Sec. 111.60-4.
The #14 AWG wire size requirement in this section is specific to
switchboard wiring, whereas the #18 AWG allowance in Sec. 111.60-4 is
for general wiring such as lighting fixtures or other uses where
appropriate.
Section 111.30-21. One comment recommended retaining this section
with modifications to allow devices which operate at elevated
temperatures, but are self-cooling and do not adversely affect
surrounding components.
The Coast Guard determined that the requirements removed from the
regulations are sufficiently addressed in the relevant construction
standards.
Section 111.30-24. One comment requested clarification on the word
``floating.''
As discussed in the preamble to the interim rule, on page 28264, a
comment to the NPRM requested that exclusion for a non-self propelled
MODU be expanded to include other OCS facilities. Since subchapter J is
not universally applicable to fixed platforms, the Coast Guard accepted
the comment's suggestion to specify ``floating'' units which are
subject to the provisions of this subchapter such as tension leg
platforms (TLP) and semi-submersible production platforms.
Section 111.30-25. Two comments noted that this section, which was
not addressed in the NPRM or the interim rule, is highly prescriptive
and limits the use of newer technologies.
The Coast Guard has determined that any new equipment resulting
from advances in technology that performs the same function as those
devices listed in Sec. 111.30-25 can be considered for approval under
Sec. 110.20-1. The list in Sec. 111.30-25 is retained because the Coast
Guard determined it to be representative of those functions necessary
for the safe operation of a vessel.
Section 111.33-11. One comment recommended specifying that ``ABS
Rules'' refers to the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel
Vessels.
The Coast Guard agrees and has changed the reference from ``ABS
Rules'' to ``ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels.''
Additionally, the reference to ``ABS MODU Rules'' has been changed to
``ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling Units.''
Section 111.35-1. One comment requested a revision to this section
that requires an alarm indicating the failure of system ventilation.
The Coast Guard may consider adding a requirement for an alarm
indicating the failure of a ventilation system in a subsequent
rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to comment.
Section 111.40-1. One comment noted that the deletion of this
section would result in the installation of panelboards never intended
for the marine environment. The comment suggests incorporating IEEE Std
45 to provide guidance for the construction of panelboards.
[[Page 23900]]
The Coast Guard agrees and is adding the suggested reference
because of its wide acceptance in the marine field.
Section 111.51-3. One comment pointed out that wording is missing
from this section which would ensure proper protective device
coordination in all cases and round out the coordination declaration
made in Sec. 111.51-1.
The Coast Guard agrees and the section is revised accordingly by
the addition of new paragraph (a).
Section 111.53. One comment suggested adding specific wording that
prohibits the use of any fuse holder constructed of porcelain or
ceramic materials or any fuse that is of the screw-in type.
The Coast Guard is reviewing the safety implications of screw-in
type fuses and may consider prohibiting those fuses in a subsequent
rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to comment.
Section 111.54-1. One comment suggested referencing IEC 56 for
circuit breakers above 1000 volts in place of the reference in
paragraph (c)(3)(ii) to IEC 947-2 for medium voltage circuit breakers.
The Coast Guard agrees that the appropriate standard for circuit
breakers above 1000 volts is IEC 56. Paragraph (c)(3)(ii) is revised
accordingly.
Section111.60-1. (1) One comment noted that in paragraph (a) the
word ``cooper'' should be changed to the word ``copper.''
Paragraph (a) has been revised accordingly.
(2) Several comments requested reinstatement of MIL-C-915F cable
pointing out that this is a current Navy standard and another comment
suggested further the addition of ``amendment 2'' to the MIL
specification.
The Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) electrical office has
informed the Coast Guard that MIL-C-915 cable is not being installed in
new construction or major modifications. Additionally, its supply of
MIL-C-915 cable has been cut-up and sold for scrap.
(3) One comment suggested that marine shipboard cable listed by a
Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL) accepted by the
Commandant is acceptable for use.
The term ``NRTL'' is most commonly used by Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA) for safety-type testing, whereas cable
testing includes physical testing as well as fire testing. The Coast
Guard maintains a list of independent testing laboratories accepted by
the Commandant for this purpose. Present Coast Guard policy is
consistent with the suggestion.
(4) One comment suggested deleting the terms ``construction'' and
``identification'' from paragraph (a) and recommended that all cable
must meet the performance requirements in IEEE Std 45.
As stated in paragraph (d), all electrical cable must now meet the
performance requirements of section 18 of IEEE Std 45.
(5) One comment recommended for inclusion in paragraph
(f) Type TC and Type ITC cables for industrial applications.
Section 111.107-1 contains the regulations for industrial systems
and cables. Special purpose or ship-specific equipment can be accepted
as equivalent under Sec. 110.20-1 during plan review.
(6) One comment recommended that incorporating IEC 92-3, removing
the words ``and identification'' from paragraph (a), and removing the
words ``and marking'' from paragraph (d) would result in economical
cables for shipbuilders. If this is not an option, the comment suggests
that the Coast Guard accept the minimum markings instead of requiring
the more extensive markings of IEEE Std 45.
The Coast Guard has determined that the minimum marking
requirements are those in IEEE Std 45. The IEEE Std 45 markings
constitute the five basic pieces of information necessary for minimum
identification.
(7) One comment suggested deleting paragraph (d) because it
unnecessarily adds additional performance requirements to material and
finished products which have met its particular standard.
Paragraph (d) is retained because it ensures IEEE Std 45
performance standards are met and guarantees that minimum safety
criteria are upheld.
(8) One comment suggested an editorial change in paragraph (f) to
correctly reference the IADC standard as an application standard.
Paragraph (f) has been revised accordingly.
(9) One comment recommended that in paragraph (e) the regulation
should specify a standard for high-voltage cable that is acceptable to
the Coast Guard.
Presently, IEEE Std 45 and IEC 92-3 as well as several MIL
specifications and UL 1072 form the acceptable standards. The Coast
Guard may consider IEC 92-354 and IEC 502 in a subsequent rulemaking
where the public will have an opportunity to comment.
Section 111.60-2. (1) One comment suggested deleting the reference
to ANSI/UL 1581 test VW-1 because it does not guarantee a degree of
flame propagation resistance such as the other specifications mentioned
in this section. It recommended replacing it with an alternate test CSA
FT-4.
The flammability tests in this section are retained. The Coast
Guard may consider test CSA FT-4 in a subsequent rulemaking where the
public will have an opportunity to comment.
(2) One comment suggested that it is not necessary to physically
separate specialty cable from other cable in all installations.
Paragraph (a) requires physical separation only if the flammability
tests in the introductory text of this section cannot be met.
(3) One comment recommended paragraph (b) be applied only to cable
runs installed in enclosed locations.
Cable that cannot meet minimum flammability requirements must
comply with both paragraphs (a) and (b) to reduce the risk of flame
spreading among cable runs and throughout the vessel.
Section 111.60-3. Several comments suggested revising paragraph (d)
to encompass special applications referred to throughout section 19 of
IEEE Std 45 and not limiting the focus on the particular application in
19.6.5 of the standard.
Paragraph (d) has been revised accordingly.
Section 111.60-4. One comment noted that the listed metric
conversions of AWG sizes do not correspond to standard metric wire
sizes. The comment suggests listing standard metric wire sizes that are
acceptable in lieu of the AWG sizes.
The metric sizes that accompany AWG numbers are provided as
approximate metric dimensions and are ``soft'' conversions from the AWG
circular mil equivalents. Actual metric nominal size is found to differ
between such standards as JIS and European. Also, other wire gauge
systems exist such as British Standard and Birmingham whose nominal
sizes and actual dimensions differ from AWG and metrics. Electrical
plans are reviewed and approved by the Coast Guard usually with an AWG
size listed and annotated with ``or equivalent.'' It is up to the
designer to choose a cable with conductors capable of equal or greater
ampacity which will pass final inspection upon installation.
Sec. 111.60-11. (1) One comment suggested modifying the section
title to read ``Wire (other than ground conductors).''
The Coast Guard determined that this change is unnecessary because
this
[[Page 23901]]
section is self-explanatory and grounding conductors are covered
elsewhere.
(2) One comment recommended qualifying the word ``enclosure'' as
``equipment enclosure.''
The Coast Guard determined that the suggested clarification is
unnecessary because wire is allowed in junction boxes, controllers, and
switchboards as well as equipment enclosures, for example, lighting
fixtures and motors.
(3) One comment suggested revising paragraph (c) to reference the
appropriate standards for wire relative to IEEE Std 45.
Paragraph (c) has been revised accordingly.
Sec. 111.60-17. (1) One comment suggested including specific
requirements for crimped ferrules or pin terminals to prevent loose
strands of wire causing shorts when used with compression type
terminals.
The Coast Guard determined that this is an installation quality
control issue addressed under the general requirements in Sec. 111.10-1
for electrical installations.
(2) Several comments recommended prohibiting twist-on type
connectors, recommended including a referenced standard or method of
securing them to prevent loosening, or recommended eliminating
paragraph (b).
The Coast Guard determined that this, again, is an installation
quality control issue addressed under the general requirements in
Sec. 111.10-1 for electrical installations. Twist-on connectors must be
installed in accordance with this entire section; safety is maintained
with proper installation. Industry has requested, and Executive Order
12866 demands, that government agencies include more performance-based
requirements rather than prescriptive regulation. Section 111.60-17 is
an example of the inclusion of a performance-based standard and
presents an allowance for other methods or new technology which meet
the same criteria.
Sec. 111.60-19. One comment recommended revising paragraph (a) to
allow temporary splices within an enclosure in hazardous locations for
repair operations necessitated by damaged cable, where replacement of
such damaged cable would shut down vessel operations. The spliced cable
run could then be replaced at a later date while the vessel is in a
shipyard.
The Coast Guard takes into consideration the economic conditions
and mission of the vessels it regulates, but its primary concern is the
safety of these vessels and their crews.
It is the responsibility of certain persons in charge of a vessel
to notify the Coast Guard in the event of a marine casualty, accident,
or serious marine incident. The cognizant OCMI will determine the
course of action to be taken, notwithstanding temporary repairs of an
emergency nature which might be deemed necessary by the master.
Sec. 111.60-23. (1) Several comments applauded the proposal to
allow limited use of Type MC cable. One comment noted that Type MC
cable had been used in the marine environment for more than 20 years.
It states that Type MC cable meeting the standards as proposed provides
an acceptable alternative while maintaining safety.
(2) One comment expressed concern that a disproportionate number of
comments support the prohibition or restriction of Type MC cable in
marine locations.
The Coast Guard determines regulatory policy based on the substance
of comments, rather than the number of comments, on a subject.
(3) Several comments recommended that instrument tray cable (ITC)
(300 volt insulation) with similar Type MC cable construction be
allowed where allowed by NEC standards.
Article 90-2(b) of the NEC states that the code does not generally
cover installations on vessels. NEC standards do not apply to Coast
Guard certificated vessels, unless specifically incorporated by
reference in this subchapter.
Alignment with NEC standards is not necessarily an objective of
this rulemaking. ITC cable has not been evaluated for use aboard
vessels.
(4) One comment noted that Sec. 111.60-23(a) refers to ``vessels''
whereas paragraphs (c)(2) and (g) refer to ``offshore floating drilling
and production facilities.''
The term ``vessel'' is broadly defined in section 3 of title 1 of
the U.S. Code to include floating production units, mobile offshore
drilling units, and ships. Paragraphs (c)(2) and (g) apply only to
offshore floating, drilling and production facilities.
(5) Several comments suggested that the word ``welded'' as used in
the term ``continuously welded corrugated metal-clad (CWCMC) cable'' be
removed throughout Sec. 111.60-23 to conform with commercial
terminology. This will provide a continuous impervious corrugated metal
sheath manufactured by either the extrusion or welded process.
The term ``continuously welded corrugated metal-clad (CWCMC)
cable'' in paragraph (a) has been changed to ``continuous corrugated
metal-clad cable'' and paragraph b(1) and paragraph (h) have been
changed accordingly.
(6) One comment questioned why only corrugated as opposed to non-
corrugated Type MC cable is allowed.
Non-corrugated Type MC cable does not have the flexibility
necessary for use on vessels or floating facilities. Corrugated cable
would be less susceptible to cracking under these conditions.
(7) Several comments recommended that the requirement for the UBVZ
listing on Type MC cable be removed. One comment stated that the UBVZ
listing does not affect construction of the cable or its suitability
for use on vessels, but does affect cable pricing and availability.
The Coast Guard agrees. The UBVZ listing has been removed from
paragraph (b). This removal is also consistent with the Coast Guard's
position that metal-clad cable is a code product and not a marine
shipboard cable.
(8) One comment recommended that the term ``impervious'' in
reference to the sheath of the cable be changed to ``gas/vaportight''
because ``gas/vaportight'' is an NEC term.
The terms ``gas-tight'' and ``vapor-tight'' have been added for
clarity.
(9) One comment suggested that the term ``close-fitting'' be
removed as undefined.
The words ``close-fitting around the conductors and fillers'' have
been added for clarity.
(10) One comment stated that paragraph (b) was unclear as to what
an independent laboratory was to certify or list.
Paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) have been combined to correct this
discrepancy.
(11) Two comments recommended that the restrictions for
Type MC cable in paragraph (c)(1) should be moved to Sec. 111.60-3
because they are applicable to all cables.
Type MC cable must be treated separately because it is not suitable
for applications such as elevators. Marine shipboard cable, described
in Sec. 111.60-1, must be used for all the services in paragraph (c).
(12) Two comments suggested that Type MC cable should be allowed in
drilling function areas as it is recognized by API RP 14F for use on
fixed production facilities.
API RP 14F applies only to fixed facilities. This subchapter does
not apply to fixed facilities.
(13) Several comments recommended removing paragraphs (c)(2) and
(g). They contend that these paragraphs are prescriptive and are
already covered
[[Page 23902]]
under the performance standard in paragraph (c)(1).
Paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) have been combined for clarity and
paragraph (g) is retained. The Coast Guard does not allow the use of
Type MC cable in areas that are inherently subject to high vibration or
the other conditions specified in paragraph (c).
(14) Several comments suggested that installation of Type MC cable
not be limited to article 334 because other articles within the NEC are
also applicable.
The other applicable articles are already referenced in article
334.
(15) Two comments recommended the acceptance of table A6 of IEEE
Std 45 as well as the ampacity tables given in the NEC since both are
based on the same method of calculation.
Type MC cable is a code product, to be installed in accordance with
article 334 of the NEC and, therefore, the NEC's ampacity tables are to
be used.
(16) Several comments suggested that the metallic sheath of Type MC
cable be allowed for use as a grounding conductor.
The Coast Guard determined that there is insufficient historical
data on the use of Type MC cable on vessels to allow the metallic
sheath to be used as a grounding conductor. Even on shipboard cable,
the Coast Guard has never allowed braided armor to be used as a
grounding conductor. The Coast Guard maintains this policy with Type MC
cable.
(17) Many comments suggested removing the prohibition of the use of
Type MC cable as interconnection between drilling and production
modules.
The Coast Guard has revised paragraph (g) to allow Type MC cable to
be used as interconnection between drilling and production modules on
the same platform. Type MC cable is still prohibited as interconnection
between temporary drilling packages and platform production modules.
(18) The Coast Guard is aware of the recently published UL 2225,
Metal-Clad Cables and Cable-Sealing Fittings For Use in Hazardous
(Classified) Locations, and may consider it as a reference in paragraph
(h) in a subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an
opportunity to comment.
(19) One comment recommended that paragraph (h) be revised to avoid
confusion between terminations and fittings for Type MC cable and those
for similar cable, such as TECK.
Paragraph (h) has been revised to assure that fittings and
terminations used must be compatible with the particular Type MC cable
used.
Section 111.70-1. One comment stated that it is unsafe to allow one
phase to remain connected in ungrounded three-phase alternating current
systems.
Paragraph (b) of this section refers to the controller/motor
overload relay and not the main disconnect device to isolate the
controller/motor from the power source. Paragraph (a) includes a
reference to ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels
addressing the main disconnect and its relationship to the motor-
running protective devices. Additionally, language has been added to
paragraph (b) to clarify that the opening of two phases refers to the
controller/motor overload devices.
Section 111.70-3. (1) One comment suggested a revision to paragraph
(d)(1), by replacing ``and'' with ``or'' to clarify that when both a
controller and motor control center exist the identification
information should only be required at one of the two.
Motor control centers group individual controllers into a central
location instead of installing each controller locally near its motor.
Normally, the use of one precludes the use of the other for a
particular motor.
(2) One comment suggested eliminating items (v) and (vii) in
paragraph (d)(1) and listing information sufficient to identify the
motor controlled, its load, voltage and phase.
The requirements in paragraph (d)(1) are consistent with IEEE Std
45 and in keeping with standard engineering practice to provide
important information necessary for the safe operation of the
electrical system.
Section 111.70-7. One comment recommended an editorial change in
paragraph (d)(2) concerning the requirements of the disconnect device.
Paragraph (d)(2) has been revised accordingly.
Section 111.75-5. One comment recommended that in paragraph (b) the
term ``lamp sizes'' be changed to ``fixture ratings'', and retain the
minimum 50 watt requirement for convenience receptacles or IEEE Std 45,
paragraph 21.6 be referenced.
Paragraph (b) has been revised accordingly.
Section 111.75-15. One comment indicated that the text of paragraph
(c) is vague, providing no firm guidance. The comment suggests
incorporating IES RP 12, Recommended Practice for Marine Lighting.
The Coast Guard may consider IES RP 12 in a subsequent rulemaking
where the public will have an opportunity to comment.
Section 111.75-17. (1) One comment suggested that the term ``range
light'' in paragraphs (b) and (c) either needs to be defined or
replaced with the term ``masthead light.''
The Coast Guard agrees and is removing the term ``range light''
which is now referred to in the Convention on International Regulations
for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS) as ``a second
masthead light.''
(2) One comment recommended the inclusion of specific photometric
requirements for battery powered navigation lights.
The Navigation Safety Advisory Committee (NAVSAC) reviewed the
adequacy of lighting on barges, which is generally powered by battery,
and concluded that no lighting requirement changes were necessary.
Section 111.75-20. (1) One comment recommended revising paragraph
(a) so that it is clear that the paragraph does not apply to lighting
fixtures in hazardous locations.
The Coast Guard is revising paragraph (a) accordingly.
(2) Two comments suggested replacing the term ``meet'' with the
term(s) ``listed/certified'' to provide a means of verifying compliance
with any industry standard and requiring lighting fixtures to be tested
by an independent third party.
It is Coast Guard policy that when a referenced standard requires
testing then the procedure is part of the regulation. Since the Coast
Guard maintains a process of independent laboratory acceptance by the
Commandant for items such as fire detection systems, cable, and marine
lighting fixtures, it is also part of our policy that such testing be
certified at these laboratories. The Coast Guard may consider third
party testing in a subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an
opportunity to comment.
Section 111.85-1. One comment recommended that each oil immersion
heater be tested by an independent third party testing institution.
An added requirement for compliance with a specific standard and
subsequent testing by a third party cannot be placed in this final rule
without opportunity for public comment. Recognizing the safety
implications of the equipment, the Coast Guard may consider the
inclusion of applicable safety standards and testing arrangements for a
subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to
comment. Presently, guidance is afforded to both manufacturer and user
in subpart 111.01 of this chapter which establishes general criteria
for all electrical equipment so that it is appropriate for the
[[Page 23903]]
environment and purpose for which it is installed.
Section 111.87-3. One comment suggested that in paragraph (a)
deleting the word ``meet'' and substituting the words ``listed/
certified.''
It is Coast Guard policy that when a referenced standard requires
testing then the procedure is part of the regulation. Since the Coast
Guard maintains a process of independent laboratory acceptance by the
Commandant for items such as fire detection systems, cable, and marine
lighting fixtures, it is also part of our policy that such testing be
certified at these laboratories. The Coast Guard may consider third
party testing in a subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an
opportunity to comment.
Section 111.105. Several comments indicated that the obsolete MI
Type cable, referenced in Sec. 111.105-17, paragraph (a), has been
eliminated by the proposed IEEE Std 45 and should also be removed from
these regulations. Additionally, with new technologies in cable jacket
chemistry, these comments suggested that the armor requirements for
hazardous location cables also be removed, as they have been for non-
hazardous areas.
The Coast Guard agrees and subpart 111.105 has been revised
accordingly.
Section 111.105-3. Several comments recommended revising this
section as it allows unarmored cable in hazardous locations.
As indicated above in the discussion of comments for subpart
111.105, the general requirement for armored cable in all hazardous
locations has been removed.
Section 111.105-5. One comment supports the inclusion of API RP 505
as a criteria for system integrity, while another comment stated that
it would be imprudent to consider the adoption of any API RP's because
they are superseded by IEC documents addressing both MODU's and fixed
platforms in a single comprehensive document.
The API RP 505 is in draft form and as such is unavailable to the
Coast Guard for review or to the public for purchase. When the document
is published, the Coast Guard may consider API RP 505 for a subsequent
rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to comment.
The IEC, in which the U.S. participates, is in the final draft
stages of IEC Publication 1892 (IEC 1892), ``Mobile and Fixed Offshore
Units--Electrical Installations.'' IEC 1892, part 3 addresses hazardous
locations. This document reflects international consensus and will be
considered for inclusion in these regulations in a subsequent
rulemaking.
Section 111.105-11. (1) One comment pointed out that the two
standards referenced in paragraph (a) are not compatible because IEC
79-11 defines two types of IS systems (Ia and Ib), whereas UL 913
defines only one.
The Coast Guard accepts the UL 913 definition or IEC 79-11 (Ia)
only. Paragraph (a) has been revised accordingly.
(2) Several comments recommended removing the option for shielded
cable in paragraph (b)(1) because most shielding may be very thin and
not suitable for safely providing sufficient isolation from non-IS
circuits. Another comment recommended in paragraph (b)(1) removing the
option for metallic armored cable since armoring is for mechanical
protection and not to be substituted for an electromagnetic
interference (EMI) shield.
The purpose of paragraph (b)(1) is to offer options to protect
intrinsically safe circuit cables from induced voltages generated by
magnetic fields of non-intrinsically safe circuit cables. The Coast
Guard agrees that an armored covering is not meant to function as an
EMI shield. However, properly installed and grounded braided armor does
afford some degree of protection depending on intercircuit parameters.
Additionally, if a shielded cable is installed for protection, it is
assumed that its dimensions have passed plan review and that it is
suitable for the service intended. Both options are retained.
Section 111.105-17. (1) One comment suggested clarifying the first
sentence in paragraph (a) so that not all hazardous locations are
required to have through runs of cable.
The intention of paragraph (a) is that all hazardous areas be
fitted with through runs of cable, therefore the requirement remains.
(2) Several comments suggested that paragraph (a) be revised to
require that cable in all hazardous locations be armored.
As indicated above in the discussion of comments for subpart
111.105, the general requirement for armored cable in all hazardous
locations has been removed but the installation of armored cable
remains as an option.
Section 111.105-31. One comment suggested adding a new paragraph
(f)(5) harmonizing Coast Guard and ABS requirements for pump room
ventilation and monitoring.
The Coast Guard recognizes the need for direction on this subject.
However, new material must be presented to the public for comment
before a final rule. The Coast Guard may consider these provisions for
a subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to
comment.
Section 111.107-1. One comment recommended removing the word
``and'' in paragraph (c)(1)(i) and adding the word ``or'' since either
standard will provide a comparable level of safety.
This section has been revised accordingly.
Section 112.05-5. One comment recommended modifying paragraph (d)
to allow equipment that supports the emergency power source (e.g., fans
and CO2 bottles).
Paragraph (d) has been revised accordingly.
Section 112.50-1. (1) One comment suggested adding a new paragraph
(l) that requires the generator circuit breaker open upon the shutting
down of the prime mover as required in ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Steel Vessels section 4/5.119.1.
A similar comment was directed towards Sec. 111.12-11, Generator
protection, of this chapter. The requirement established in
Sec. 111.12-11 is applicable to all generators. The equipment described
in Sec. 112.50-1 are special features for emergency generators only.
Therefore the restating of this requirement is unnecessary.
(2) One comment indicated that in paragraph (d) the 45 second
response time is longer than the 30 second response of the standby ship
service generator required for unattended machinery plants in 46 CFR
62.50-30(k)(2).
The 45 second requirement in this section is for emergency
generator sets and is aligned with SOLAS 74, Regulation II-1/42.3.1.2
requirements. The 30 second requirement in 46 CFR part 62 is for a
standby ship service generator in an unattended machinery space. If the
standby ship service generator does not come on line within its
allotted time, the emergency source would power its circuits shortly
thereafter.
Section 112.50-7. One comment indicated that paragraph (c)(3)
appears to have been deleted.
The five asterisks after paragraph (c)(2) indicates that the
remainder of this section is retained. However, paragraph (d) is
removed by the amendatory language of item 169 in the interim rule.
Part 113. One comment pointed out that the title of several
sections of this part use the words ``alarm system'' as a general term
for the ``general emergency alarms and fire alarms.'' It suggested not
using this terminology because it
[[Page 23904]]
typically describes ``machinery alarm systems.''
In this part, the terminology is used with consideration of the
context of each subpart. Wherever in this part the regulations
reference the general emergency alarm system, the words ``general
emergency alarm system'' are used. The more generic term of ``alarm
system'' is used in reference to machinery alarm systems and other
specialized alarms such as engineers' assistance needed, steering
failure, and refrigerated spaces where appropriate.
Section 113.05-7. (1) One comment noted that in paragraph (b) the
reference to IEC 553 is a misprint and should read IEC 533 (entitled
Electromagnetic Compatibility of Electrical and Electronic
Installations in Ships) as stated in Sec. 110.10-1, Incorporation by
reference.
Paragraph (b) has been revised accordingly.
(2) One comment stated that the environmental test requirements of
this section are burdensome if applied to each new piece of equipment
due to advances in technology and the continual development of new
components. The comment suggested creating a self-certification
requirement similar to 46 CFR 62.20-5, Self-certification.
The Coast Guard does not deem self-certification as sufficient for
this equipment. Testing of original and redesigned equipment required
by subchapter Q to be Coast Guard ``approved'' is performed by
independent laboratories accepted by the Commandant. The testing
protocols and their results are strictly reviewed by the Coast Guard or
designated third parties before an approval certificate is issued.
Alarms that are allowed in 46 CFR part 62 to be self-certified must be
designed to meet the environmental standards of 46 CFR 62.25-30,
Environmental design standards, which reference ABS Rules for Building
and Classing Steel Vessels. Subchapter J also references ABS (ABS Rules
for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, table 4/11.1) for
environmental testing requirements.
Section 113.10-7. One comment suggested that the requirement for
connection boxes to meet IEC IP 67 is unnecessarily severe.
In all subparts where the interim rule required connection boxes to
be NEMA 250 Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67, the requirement has changed to
NEMA 250 Type 4 or 4X or IEC IP 56 to align the requirement with the
definition of ``watertight.''
Section 113.25-10. One comment suggested that red flashing lights
be used only in conjunction with the general emergency alarm signal and
for no other purpose. This is preferable to the IMO Code on Alarms and
Indicators, which allows the color red to also be used when indicating
the release of fire-extinguishing medium. A standardized color would
allow quick identification and response by personnel.
While the value of this practice is realized, the Coast Guard will
not include specific provisions or requirements on this subject in this
rule without allowing an opportunity for public comment. The term
``flashing red lights'' has been changed to include rotating beacons as
well.
Section 113.25-11. One comment suggested revising the introductory
sentence in Sec. 113.25-11 to read as follows, ``Each contact maker,
where installed, must--''
The Coast Guard determined that the requirements listed in this
section apply to all contact makers, conventional or electronic type
integrated in the public address system, and the addition of the words
``where installed'' does not add to the clarity of the sentence.
Section 113.25-12. One comment recommended in paragraph (a) the use
of air operated alarm signals which may be actuated by a solenoid valve
located outside the hazardous area.
This section does not preclude air operated alarm signals or other
types compatible with the environment in which they are used. Any new
or non-conventional alarm signal will be considered in the plan review
process.
Section 113.30-3. One comment requested clarification of the phrase
``must be independent of the ship's electrical system.'' The ship's
electrical system may be interpreted to mean the ship's AC electrical
system or the ship's DC system with a battery power source.
The power for the emergency means of communication required by this
subpart must not be reliant upon the vessel's normal source or
emergency source of AC or DC power. Acceptable methods of power include
sound-powered phone, telephone systems which are powered by hand
cranked generators which charge capacitor circuits, and individually
battery powered devices.
Section 113.30-5. (1) One comment suggested that in paragraph (a) a
cross-reference to 46 CFR 62.50-20(f)(2) be added.
The cross-reference to 46 CFR 62.50-20 has been added.
(2) One comment recommended editorial revision to paragraph (h)(1)
for clarity.
Paragraph (h)(1) has been revised accordingly.
Section 113.30-25. (1) One comment indicated in paragraph (i) that
cables for safety related circuits should only be permitted to be
routed through high fire risk areas if it is technically impractical to
route them otherwise or if they serve circuits within the high risk
area. In either case, cables should be of the fire resistant type. The
comment stated that decisions in these areas should not be affected by
commercial considerations.
The Coast Guard develops its regulations with the primary
consideration being safety. Any commercial consideration would be
secondary and related to cost savings to the industry through
harmonizing with domestic and international industry standards
resulting in additional options.
Section 111.60-1 requires that accepted marine shipboard cable must
meet the respective flammability tests contained in the referenced or
companion standards. These tests are a validation that the cable is
``flame retardant''; i.e., that the flame is not propagated. IEC 331,
however, measures the ``fire-resisting'' characteristics as noted in
the scope ``as one which will continue to function normally during and
after a prolonged fire.''
As published in the interim rule, paragraph (i) states that cable
runs through high fire risk areas, which includes servicing equipment
within these areas, must meet IEC 331. It is the intent that such
cables not only prevent the proliferation of flame but also maintain
service to the equipment as well.
(2) One comment suggested modifying the last line of paragraph (e)
to read ``an emergency power source'' instead of ``the vessel's
electric system.''
The paragraph has been revised to clarify which vessel's electric
source is intended.
Section 113.43-3. The reference to Secs. 58.25-45 and 111.93-9 is
out-of-date and has been corrected.
Section 113.50-15. One comment noted that, as written, this section
appears to require explosionproof speakers in hazardous locations, for
example, a cargo pump room on a tanker. The comment requests review of
this requirement to determine whether it is excessive.
All systems and enclosures for hazardous locations must be
certified for the particular Class and Division (Zone) in which they
are installed. In the example given, if the speaker system were to be
found intrinsically safe during plan review, then explosionproof
speakers would not be required. Alternatively, if a study did not prove
that the speakers were necessary in that
[[Page 23905]]
location, they would be disallowed under Sec. 111.105-31(f) or, if
proven necessary, they must be explosionproof.
Section 113.50-20. One comment suggested adding additional
requirements applicable to public rooms, alleyways, and stairways to
align the regulations with the IMO Code of Alarms and Indicators.
The Coast Guard may consider additional requirements to align
Sec. 113.50-20 with the IMO Code on Alarms and Indicators in a
subsequent rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to
comment.
Section 113.70. One comment recommended adding a new subpart that
addresses the installation and operation of gas detection systems. The
comment suggests these systems meet the general requirements of the
International Society for Measurement and Control (ISA) SP12.13 parts I
and II.
The Coast Guard may consider additional requirements for gas
detection systems in a subsequent rulemaking where the public will have
an opportunity to comment.
Section 161.002-1. Components for automatic fire detection systems,
EN54 parts 1 through 11, published by the European Committee for
Standardization (CEN) remain absent from this section because several
of the documents obtained by the Coast Guard were in draft form. The
Coast Guard may consider the finalized documents for a subsequent
rulemaking where the public will have an opportunity to comment.
Incorporation by Reference
The Director of the Federal Register has approved the material in
Secs. 110.10-1 and 161.002-1 for incorporation by reference under 5
U.S.C. 552 and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of the material are available from
the source listed in those sections.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866 and does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. It
has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under that
Order. It is not significant under the regulatory policies and
procedures of the Department of Transportation (DOT) (44 FR 11040;
February 26, 1979). A Regulatory Evaluation under paragraph 10e of the
regulatory policies and procedures of DOT is available in the docket
for inspection or copying where indicated under ADDRESSES. A summary of
the Evaluation follows:
Most of the changes to the regulations are either editorial or
update technical specifications to reflect the latest practices.
Although some of these changes will cause minor cost increases for
shipbuilders, others will result in substantial savings. The cost
increases resulting from these rules will be more than offset by the
cost savings, due to relaxations in the rules. The Coast Guard
estimates that the cost of complying with the rule over the next 10
years will total $33,753,392 (in present value); but, this cost will be
more than offset by the estimated net benefits of $73,538,213. This is
a cost-benefit ratio of $1.00 of costs to $2.18 of benefits.
Many of the changes causing cost increases are already current
marine industry practices, such as an increase in the protection of
cable from bilge water.
There are several intangible benefits. Due to the increased use of
national and international standards, certain items will now be more
readily available ``off the shelf'' for marine use. A significant
economic savings will result from the ability of equipment
manufacturers, in many cases, to meet the new performance
specifications instead of the old, prescriptive design standards. Also,
the cost of submitting detailed plans and specifications to the Coast
Guard for approval of certain equipment, such as sound powered
telephones, emergency loudspeaker systems, and navigation lights, will
be eliminated.
No comments were received to the Regulatory Evaluation or its
summary in the preamble to the interim rule.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the
Coast Guard considered whether this final rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small
entities'' include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that
are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
This rule will affect entities that come under Standard Industrial
Code (SIC) categories of 4412 through 4489 (Water Transportation) and
1311 and 1381 (Oil and Gas Extraction), both groups of which are
considered small entities if they have 500 or less employees, and under
SIC category 3731 (Shipbuilding and Repair), which are considered small
entities if they have 1,000 or less employees.
The Coast Guard has taken measures to accommodate the interests of
small entities during the development of this rule. The rule is limited
to vessels that are constructed or undergo major modifications after
September 30, 1996, thereby exempting the existing fleet from having to
conform to these requirements. Furthermore, it is limited to Coast
Guard-inspected commercial vessels, such as oil and chemical tankers,
container ships, large passenger vessels, mobile offshore drilling
units, research vessels, and school ships, which tend to be larger
vessels. It does not apply to uninspected passenger vessels, commercial
fishing vessels, or the overwhelming majority of inspected, small-
passenger vessels.
To reduce the burden on small entities, this rule purges obsolete
and out-of-date regulations and eliminates requirements that create an
unwarranted differential between Coast Guard's regulations and industry
standards. It enhances the flexibility of vessel owners, operators,
manufacturers, and shipbuilders by incorporating, wherever possible,
more options for compliance or by replacing prescriptive requirements
with performance standards.
This rule reduces costs by increasing choices available during the
new construction or major modification of a vessel. As discussed under
the Regulatory Evaluation section in this preamble, this rule will
reduce costs of shipbuilding for all entities, whether large or small.
The Coast Guard estimates that the cost of complying with the rule over
the next 10 years will total $33,753,392 (in present value); but, this
cost will be more than offset by the estimated net benefits of
$73,538,213. This is a cost-benefit ratio of $1.00 of costs to $2.18 of
benefits.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that this final rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
Assistance for Small Entities
In accordance with section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), the Coast Guard
offers to assist small entities in understanding this rule so that they
can better evaluate its effects on them. If your small business or
organization is affected by this rule and you have questions concerning
its provisions or options for compliance, please contact Ms. Laura
Hamman, Office of Design and Engineering Standards, 202-267-2206.
[[Page 23906]]
Collection of Information
This final rule provides for a collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
I. The following particulars apply to subpart 110.25:
DOT No.: 2115.
OMB Control No.: 2115-0115.
Administration: U.S. Coast Guard.
Title: Electrical Engineering Requirements for Merchant Vessels.
Need for information: Subpart 110.25 requires industry to complete
electrical engineering plans to meet performance requirements on newly
built vessels and modifications of current vessels.
Proposed Use of Information
This information is necessary to determine compliance with the
electrical regulations before vessel construction or modification
begins.
Frequency of Response: The information must be submitted when a
vessel is built or modified.
Burden Estimate: 478 hours.
Respondents: 175 owners or operators.
Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 1 hour per submission.
II. The following particulars apply to subpart 161.002:
DOT No.: 2115.
OMB Control No.: 2115-0121.
Administration: U.S. Coast Guard.
Title: Electrical Engineering Requirements for Merchant Vessels.
Need for Information: Subpart 161.002 concerns application for type
approval of fire protection systems.
Proposed use of Information: This information is necessary to
ensure compliance with the electrical regulations.
Frequency of Response: A response is due each time initial approval
is sought and each time a revision is requested.
Burden Estimate: 60 hours.
Respondents: 6 manufacturers.
Average Burden Hours per Respondent: 10 hours per respondent.
As required by 5 U.S.C. 3507(d), the Coast Guard submitted a copy
of this rule to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for its
review of the collection of information. OMB has approved the
collection. The subpart numbers are 110.25 of subchapter J and 161.002
of subchapter Q. The corresponding OMB approval numbers are OMB Control
Number 2115-0115 for subpart 110.25, which expires on August 3, 1999,
and OMB Control Number 2115-0121 for subpart 161.002, which expires
September 30, 1999.
Persons are not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Federalism
The Coast Guard has analyzed this rule under the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has determined that
this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Environment
The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule
and concluded that, under paragraph 2.B.2.e(34)(d) and (e) of
Commandant Instruction M16475.1B, this rule is categorically excluded
from further environmental documentation. This rule concerns only
system arrangement and equipment approval. The approved system
arrangement and equipment required by this rule should contribute to
the enhancement of vessel safety and, thereby, help to minimize impacts
on the marine environment. A ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' is
available in the docket for inspection or copying where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 108
Fire prevention, Marine safety, Occupational safety and health, Oil
and gas exploration, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels.
46 CFR Part 110
Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels.
46 CFR Parts 111 and 112
Incorporation by reference, Vessels.
46 CFR Part 113
Communications equipment, Fire prevention, Incorporation by
reference, Vessels.
46 CFR Part 161
Fire prevention, Incorporation by reference, Marine safety,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 46 CFR parts 108, 110, 111,
112, 113, and 161, which was published at 61 FR 28260 on June 4, 1996,
is adopted as a final rule with the following changes and amendments:
PART 110--GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1509; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703;
E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; 49 CFR 1.45,
1.46; Sec. 110.01-2 also issued under 44 U.S.C. 3507.
2. Revise Sec. 110.01-3(b) and (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.01-3 Repairs and alterations.
* * * * *
(b) Alterations and modifications, such as re-engining, re-
powering, upgrading of the main propulsion control system, or replacing
extensive amounts of cabling, must comply with the regulations in this
subchapter.
(c) Conversions specified in 46 U.S.C. 2101(14a), such as the
addition of a midbody or a change in the service of the vessel, are
handled on a case-by-case basis by the Commanding Officer, Marine
Safety Center.
3. In Sec. 110.10-1(b)--
a. In the entry for ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel
Vessels, remove ``1995'' and add, in its place, ``1996'' and add
``111.01-9;'', in numerical order, to the list of sections affected;
b. In the entry for IEEE Std 45-1983, add ``111.40-1;'' and
``111.75-5(b);'', in numerical order, to the list of sections affected;
c. In the entry for the International Electrotechnical Commission,
remove ``1, Rue de Varembe,'' and add, in its place, ``3, rue de
Varembe,'' and add, in numerical order, new entries for IEC 56 and IEC
92-401 to read as follows;
d. In the entry for IEC 947-2, remove ``111.54-1(c)'' from the list
of sections affected;
e. In the entry for NFPA 70, add ``111.50-7;'', in numerical order,
to the list of sections affected;
f. Before the entry for Underwriters Laboratories Inc., add a new
entry ``NEC, see NFPA 70.''; and
g. In the entry for UL 489, add ``111.01-15(c).'', in numerical
order, to the list of sections affected:
Sec. 110.10-1 Incorporation by reference.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
* * * * *
IEC 56, High-voltage alternating-current circuit-breakers, 1987,
(Including Amendment 1, 1992, Amendment 2, 1995, and Amendment 3,
1996...........................................................111.54-1
* * * * *
IEC 92-401, Electrical Installations in Ships, Part 401:
Installation and test of completed installation, 1987..........111.05-9
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 110.15-1, revise the definitions of ``dripproof,''
``nonsparking fan,'' ``waterproof,'' and ``watertight'' to read as
follows:
[[Page 23907]]
Sec. 110.15-1 Definitions.
* * * * *
Dripproof means enclosed so that equipment meets at least a NEMA
250 Type 1 with dripshield, NEMA 250 Type 2, EMA 250 Type 12, or IEC IP
22 rating.
* * * * *
Nonsparking fan means nonsparking fan as defined in ABS Rules for
Building and Classing Steel Vessels, section 4/5B7.7.
* * * * *
Waterproof means watertight; except that, moisture within or
leakage into the enclosure is allowed if it does not interfere with the
operation of the equipment enclosed. In the case of a generator or
motor enclosure, waterproof means watertight; except that, leakage
around the shaft may occur if the leakage is prevented from entering
the oil reservoir and the enclosure provides for automatic drainage.
Watertight means enclosed so that equipment meets at least a NEMA
250 Type 4 or 4X or an IEC IP 56 rating.
5. Revise Sec. 110.25-1(i)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 110.25-1 Plans and information required for new construction.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(6) A certificate of testing, and listing or certification, by an
independent laboratory, where required by the respective standard.
* * * * *
PART 111--ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS--GENERAL PROVISIONS
6. The authority citation for part 111 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; 49 CFR 1.46.
7. In Sec. 111.01-1, redesignate the introductory text and
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) as paragraphs (a), (a)(1), (a)(2), and
(a)(3), respectively; in newly redesignated paragraph (a)(1), remove
the words ``conditions; and'' and add, in their place, the word
``conditions.''; and add paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.01-1 General.
* * * * *
(b) Combustible material should be avoided in the construction of
electrical equipment.
8. In Sec. 111.01-9, in paragraphs (a) and (c), remove ``32'' and
add, in its place, ``22'' and revise paragraph (b) and the note to this
section to read as follows:
Sec. 111.01-9 Degrees of protection.
* * * * *
(b) Electrical equipment in locations requiring exceptional degrees
of protection as defined in Sec. 110.15-1 of this chapter must be
enclosed to meet at least the minimum degrees of protection in ABS
Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, table 4/5B.1, or
appropriate NEMA 250 Type for the service intended. Each enclosure must
be designed in such a way that the total rated temperature of the
equipment inside the enclosure is not exceeded.
* * * * *
Note to Sec. 111.01-9: The degrees of protection specified in
this section are described in NEMA Standards Publication No. 250 and
IEC IP Code 529 and designated in ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Steel Vessels, table 4/5B.1.
9. Revise Sec. 111.01-15(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.01-15 Temperature ratings.
* * * * *
(c) A 45 deg.C ambient temperature is assumed for cable and all
other non-rotating electrical equipment in boiler rooms, in engine
rooms, in auxiliary machinery rooms, and on weather decks. For
installations using UL 489 SA marine type circuit breakers the ambient
temperature for that component is assumed to be 40 deg.C. For
installations using Navy type circuit breakers the ambient temperature
for that component is assumed to be 50 deg.C.
* * * * *
10. In Sec. 111.01-19, revise the introductory text of paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.01-19 Inclination of the vessel.
(a) All electrical equipment must be designed and installed to
operate for the particular location and environment in which it is to
be used. Additionally, electrical equipment necessary for the
maneuvering, navigation, and safety of the vessel or its personnel must
be designed and installed to operate under any combination of the
following conditions:
* * * * *
11. Revise Sec. 111.05-9 to read as follows:
Sec. 111.05-9 Masts.
Each nonmetallic mast and topmast must have a lightning ground
conductor in accordance with section 10 of IEC 92-401.
12. Revise Sec. 111.05-19(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.05-19 Tank vessels; grounded distribution systems.
* * * * *
(b) If the voltage of a distribution system on a tank vessel is
1,000 volts or greater, line to line, and the distribution system is
grounded (including high-impedance grounding), any resulting current
must not flow through a hazardous (classified) location.
13. In Sec. 111.05-23, in paragraph (d), remove the word ``branch''
and add, in its place, the word ``feeder'' and add a note to paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.05-23 Location of ground detection indicators.
* * * * *
Note to paragraph (d): An alarm contact or indicating device
returned to the main switchboard via a control cable, that allows the
detecting equipment to remain near the transformer or other isolating
device for local troubleshooting, is allowed.
14. Revise Sec. 111.05-27 to read as follows:
Sec. 111.05-27 Grounded neutral alternating current systems.
Grounded neutral and high-impedance grounded neutral alternating
current systems must have a suitably sensitive ground detection system
which indicates current in the ground connection, is able to withstand
the maximum available fault current without damage, and provides
continuous indication of circuit status to ground. A provision must be
included to compare indications under fault conditions with those under
normal conditions.
15. In Sec. 111.05-33, revise the section heading and paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
Sec. 111.05-33 Equipment safety grounding (bonding) conductors.
* * * * *
(b) Each equipment grounding conductor (other than a system
grounding conductor) of a cable must be permanently identified as a
grounding conductor in accordance with the requirements of article 310-
12(b) of the NEC.
Sec. 111.10-1 [Amended]
16. In Sec. 111.10-1(a), remove the words ``auxiliary propulsion''
and add, in their place, ``propulsion auxiliary''.
Sec. 111.12-1 [Amended]
17. In Sec. 111.12-1(a), remove the words ``section 4/5.21 of the
ABS Rules'' and add, in their place, the words ``sections 4/5C2.15 and
4/5C2.17 of the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels'';
and remove the words ``ABS MODU Rules'' and add, in their place, ``ABS
Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling Units''.
[[Page 23908]]
Sec. 111.12-3 [Amended]
18. In Sec. 111.12-3, remove the words ``section 4/5.23 of the ABS
Rules'' and add, in their place, the words ``sections 4/5C2.19.1, 4/
5D2.5.1, 4/5D2.5.2, and 4/5D2.17.6 of the ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Steel Vessels''; and remove the words ``ABS MODU Rules'' and
add, in their place, the words ``ABS Rules for Building and Classing
Mobile Offshore Drilling Units''.
Sec. 111.12-5 [Amended]
19. In Sec. 111.12-5, remove the words ``ABS Rules'' and add, in
their place, the words ``ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel
Vessels''; and remove the words ``ABS MODU Rules'' and add, in their
place, the words ``ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore
Drilling Units''.
Sec. 111.12-7 [Amended]
20. In Sec. 111.12-7, remove the words ``sections 4/5.31 and 4/5.33
of the ABS Rules'' and add, in their place, the words ``sections 4/
5C2.19.2, 4/5C2.19.3, 4/5C2.21.2, and 4/5C2.21.3 of the ABS Rules for
Building and Classing Steel Vessels''; and remove the words ``ABS MODU
Rules'' and add, in their place, the words ``ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling Units''.
21. In Sec. 111.12-11, redesignate paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) as
paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3), respectively, and add new paragraph
(c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.12-11 Generator protection.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Open upon the shutting down of the prime mover;
* * * * *
22. Revise Sec. 111.15-5(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.15-5 Battery installation.
* * * * *
(c) Small batteries. Small size battery installations must not be
located in poorly-ventilated spaces, such as closets, or in living
spaces, such as staterooms.
* * * * *
23. Revise Sec. 111.15-20(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.15-20 Conductors.
* * * * *
(c) Each connecting cable must have sufficient capacity to carry
the maximum charging current or maximum discharge current, whichever is
greater, while maintaining the proper voltage at the load end.
Sec. 111.25-1 [Amended]
24. In Sec. 111.25-1, remove ``(a) and (b)''.
25. In Sec. 111.30-5(a), revise the introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 111.30-5 Construction.
(a) All low voltage and medium voltage switchboards (as low and
medium are determined within the standard used) must meet--
* * * * *
26. Add Sec. 111.30-11 to read as follows:
Sec. 111.30-11 Deck coverings.
Non-conducting deck coverings, such as non-conducting mats or
gratings, suitable for the specific switchboard voltage must be
installed for personnel protection at the front and rear of the
switchboard and must extend the entire length of, and be of sufficient
width to suit, the operating space.
27. In Sec. 111.30-19, revise paragraphs (b)(3), (b)(4), and (b)(5)
to read as follows and remove paragraph (b)(6):
Sec. 111.30-19 Buses and wiring.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) No. 14 AWG (2.10 mm\2\) or larger or must be ribbon cable or
similar conductor size cable recommended for use in low-power
instrumentation, monitoring, or control circuits by the equipment
manufacturer;
(4) Flame retardant meeting ANSI/UL 1581 test VW-1 or IEC 332-1;
and
(5) Extra flexible, if used on a hinged panel.
Sec. 111.33-11 [Amended]
28. In Sec. 111.33-11, remove the words ``section 4/5.84 of ABS
Rules'' and add, in their place, the words ``sections 4/5D2.17.9 and 4/
5D2.17.10 of ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels'';
remove the words ``ABS MODU Rules'' and add, in their place, the words
``ABS Rules for Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling Units''.
Sec. 111.35-1 [Amended]
29. In Sec. 111.35-1, remove the words ``sections 4/5.79, 4/5.81,
4/5.83, and 4/5.84 ABS Rules'' and add, in their place, the words
``sections 4/5D2.5, 4/5D2.11, 4/5D2.13, 4/5D2.17.8e, 4/5D2.17.9, and 4/
5D2.17.10 of ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels''; and
remove the words ``ABS MODU Rules'' and add, in their place, the words
``ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels''.
30. Add Sec. 111.40-1 to read as follows:
Sec. 111.40-1 Panelboard standard.
Each panelboard must meet section 23.1 of IEEE Std 45.
31. In Sec. 111.51-3, redesignate the introductory text and
paragraphs (a) and (b) as paragraphs (b), (b)(1), and (b)(2),
respectively, and add paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.51-3 Protection of vital equipment.
(a) The coordination of overcurrent protective devices must be
demonstrated for all potential plant configurations.
* * * * *
Sec. 111.54-1 [Amended]
32. In Sec. 111.54-1(c)(3)(ii), remove ``IEC 947-2, Part 2'' and
add, in its place, ``IEC 56''.
33. In Sec. 111.60-1, in paragraph (a), remove the words ``Each
cable'' and add, in their place, the words ``Each marine shipboard
cable'' and remove the word ``cooper'' and add, in its place, the word
``copper''; and revise paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.60-1 Cable construction and testing.
* * * * *
(f) Direct current electric cable, for industrial applications
only, may be applied in accordance with IADC-DCCS-1/1991.
34. Revise Sec. 111.60-3(d) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.60-3 Cable Application.
* * * * *
(d) Cables for special applications defined in section 19 of IEEE
Std 45 must meet the provisions of that section.
35. Revise Sec. 111.60-11(c) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.60-11 Wire.
* * * * *
(c) Wire, other than in switchboards, must meet the requirements in
sections 19.6.4 and 19.8 of IEEE Std 45; IL-W-76D; MIL-W-16878F; UL 44;
UL 83; or equivalent standard.
* * * * *
36. Revise Sec. 111.60-23 to read as follows:
Sec. 111.60-23 Metal-clad (Type MC) cable.
(a) Metal-clad (Type MC) cable permitted on board a vessel must be
continuous corrugated metal-clad cable.
(b) The cable must--
(1) Have a corrugated gas-tight, vapor-tight, and watertight sheath
of aluminum or other suitable metal that is close-fitting around the
conductors and fillers and that has an overall jacket of an impervious
PVC or thermoset material; and
(2) Be certified or listed by an independent laboratory as meeting
the requirements of UL 1569.
(c) The cable is not allowed in areas or applications exposed to
high
[[Page 23909]]
vibration, festooning, repeated flexing, excessive movement, or
twisting, such as in engine rooms, on elevators, or in the area of
drill floors, draw works, shakers, and mud pits.
(d) The cable must be installed in accordance with article 334 of
the NEC. The ampacity values found in table A6 of IEEE Std 45 may not
be used.
(e) The side wall pressure on the cable must not exceed 1,000
pounds per foot of radius.
(f) Equipment grounding conductors in the cable must be sized in
accordance with article 250-95 of the NEC. System grounding conductors
must be of a cross-sectional area not less than that of the normal
current carrying conductors of the cable. The metal sheath must be
grounded but must not be used as a required grounding conductor.
(g) On an offshore floating drilling and production facility, the
cable may be used as interconnect cable between production modules and
between fixed distribution panels within the production modules, except
that interconnection between production and temporary drilling packages
is prohibited. Also, the cable may be used within columns, provided
that the columns are not subject to the conditions described in
paragraph (c) of this section.
(h) When the cable is used within a hazardous (classified)
location, terminations or fittings must be listed, and must be
appropriate, for the particular Type MC cable used and for the
environment in which they are installed.
37. In Sec. 111.70-1, revise paragraph (a) introductory text, and
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.70-1 General.
(a) Each motor circuit, controller, and protection must meet the
requirements of ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels,
sections 4/5A5.13, 4/5B2.13, 4/5B2.15, and 4/5C4; ABS Rules for
Building and Classing Mobile Offshore Drilling Units, sections 4/3.87
through 4/3.94 and 4/3.115.6; or IEC 92-301, as appropriate, except the
following circuits:
* * * * *
(b) In ungrounded three-phase alternating current systems, only two
motor-running protective devices (overload coil or heater type relay
within the motor and controller) need be used in any two ungrounded
conductors, except when a wye-delta or a delta-wye transformer is used.
* * * * *
Sec. 111.70-7 [Amended]
38. In Sec. 111.70-7(d)(2), remove the words ``not have any'' and
add, in their place, the words ``have no''.
39. Revise Sec. 111.75-5(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.75-5 Lighting branch circuits.
* * * * *
(b) Connected load. The connected load on a lighting branch circuit
must not be more than 80 percent of the rating of the overcurrent
protective device, computed on the basis of the fixture ratings and in
accordance with IEEE Std 45, section 21.6.
* * * * *
Sec. 111.75-17 [Amended]
40. In Sec. 111.75-17 (b) and (c), remove the words ``stern, and
range lights'' and add, in their place, the words ``and stern lights''.
Sec. 111.75-20 [Amended]
41. In Sec. 111.75-20(a), after the words ``lighting fixture'', add
the words ``for a non-hazardous location''.
Sec. 111.105-11 [Amended]
42. In Sec. 111.105-11(a), after ``IEC 79-11'', add
``(Ia)''.
43. Revise Sec. 111.105-17(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.105-17 Wiring methods for hazardous locations.
(a) Through runs of marine shipboard cable meeting subpart 111.60
of this part are required for all hazardous locations. Armored cable
may be used to enhance ground detection capabilities. Additionally,
Type MC cable may be used subject to the restrictions in Sec. 111.60-
23.
* * * * *
44. In Sec. 111.105-31, revise paragraphs (f)(4), (i)(1), (j), (k),
(l) introductory text, and (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.105-31 Flammable or combustible cargo with a flashpoint below
60 degrees C (140 degrees F), liquid sulfur and inorganic acid
carriers.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) Marine shipboard cables that supply explosionproof lighting
fixtures that are in the cargo handling room.
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(1) Through runs of marine shipboard cable; and
* * * * *
(j) Cargo hose stowage space. A cargo hose stowage space must not
have any electrical equipment except explosionproof lighting fixtures
and through runs of marine shipboard cable.
(k) Cargo piping in a space. A space that has cargo piping must not
have any electrical equipment except explosionproof lighting fixtures
and through runs of marine shipboard cable.
(l) Weather locations. The following locations in the weather are
Class I, Division 1 (Zone 1) locations (except the open deck area on an
inorganic acid carrier which is considered a non-hazardous location)
and may have only approved intrinsically safe, explosionproof, or
purged and pressurized electrical equipment, and through runs of marine
shipboard cable if the location is--
* * * * *
(n) Duct keel ventilation or lighting. (1) The lighting and
ventilation system for each pipe tunnel, double bottom, or duct keel
must meet ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, section 4/
5E1.15.
(2) If a fixed gas detection system is installed, it must meet the
requirements of SOLAS 74 and ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel
Vessels, section 4/5.
45. Revise Sec. 111.105-32(f)(1), (g)(1), (i)(2), and (j)(2) to
read as follows:
Sec. 111.105-32 Bulk liquefied flammable gas and ammonia carriers.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(1) Through runs of marine shipboard cable;
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) Through runs of marine shipboard cable;
* * * * *
(i) * * *
(2) Through runs of marine shipboard cable.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(2) Through runs of marine shipboard cable.
* * * * *
Sec. 111.105-39 [Amended]
46. In Sec. 111.105-39, in the introductory text and paragraph (a),
remove ``ABS Rule 4/5.157'' and add, in its place, ``ABS Rules for
Building and Classing Steel Vessels, section 4/5E3''.
Sec. 111.105-40 [Amended]
47. In Sec. 111.105-40 (a) and (c) remove ``ABS Rule 4/5.160'' and
add, in its place, ``ABS Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels,
section 4/5E4''.
Sec. 111.105-43 [Amended]
48. In Sec. 111.105-43(c), remove the words ``armored or MI type''
and add, in their place, ``marine shipboard''.
[[Page 23910]]
49. Revise Sec. 111.107-1(c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 111.107-1 Industrial systems.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Be installed in accordance with Sec. 111.60-5 and meet the
flammability test requirements of IEEE Std 1202, section 18.13.5 of
IEEE Std 45, or IEC 332-3, Category A; or
* * * * *
PART 112--EMERGENCY POWER AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS
50. The authority citation for part 112 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; 49 CFR 1.46.
51. Revise Sec. 112.05-5(d) to read as follows:
Sec. 112.05-5 Emergency power source.
* * * * *
(d) The emergency power source, its associated transforming
equipment, and the emergency switchboard must be located aft of the
collision bulkhead, outside of the machinery casing, and above the
uppermost continuous deck. Each compartment containing this equipment
must be readily accessible from the open deck and must not contain
machinery not associated with, or equipment not in support of, the
normal operation of the emergency power source. Equipment in support of
the normal operation of the emergency power source includes, but is not
limited to, ventilation fans, CO2 bottles, space heaters,
and internal communication devices, such as sound powered phones.
* * * * *
PART 113--COMMUNICATION AND ALARM SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT
52. The authority citation for part 113 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; 49 CFR 1.46.
Sec. 113.05-7 [Amended]
53. In Sec. 113.05-7, in paragraph (a), remove the words ``ABS
Rules'' and add, in their place, the words ``ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Steel Vessels''; and, in paragraph (b), remove the number
``553'' and add, in its place, the number ``533''.
Sec. 113.10-7 [Amended]
54. In Sec. 113.10-7, remove ``Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67'' and add,
in its place, ``Type 4 or 4X or IEC IP 56''.
Sec. 113.20-3 [Amended]
55. In Sec. 113.20-3, remove ``Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67'' and add,
in its place, ``Type 4 or 4X or IEC IP 56''.
Sec. 113.25-10 [Amended]
56. In Sec. 113.25-10--
a. Revise the section heading to read ``Emergency red-flashing
lights'';
b. In paragraph (a) introductory text, add the word ``general''
before the word ``emergency'', wherever it appears, and remove the
words ``flashing red light'' and add, in their place, ``red-flashing
light or rotating beacon''; and
c. In paragraph (b), remove the words ``flashing red light'' and
add, in their place, the words ``red-flashing light or rotating
beacon''.
Sec. 113.25-11 [Amended]
57. In Sec. 113.25-11(a), remove ``Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67'' and
add, in its place, ``Type 4 or 4X or IEC IP 56''.
58. In Sec. 113.30-5, add paragraph (a)(7) and revise paragraph
(h)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 113.30-5 Requirements.
(a) * * *
(7) The engineering officers' accommodations, if the vessel is an
automated, self-propelled vessel under Sec. 62.50-20(f) of this
chapter.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(1) Be on a circuit separate from any other station required by
this section; and
* * * * *
59. In Sec. 113.30-25--
a. In paragraph (c), remove ``IEC IP 32'' and add, in its place,
``IEC IP 22'';
b. In paragraph (e), remove the words ``vessel's electric system''
and add, in their place, the words ``final emergency bus'';
c. In paragraph (h), remove ``Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67'' and add,
in its place, ``Type 4 or 4X or IEC IP 56''; and
d. Revise paragraph (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 113.30-25 Detailed requirements.
* * * * *
(i) Voice communication cables must run as close to the fore and
aft centerline of the vessel as practicable. The cable must not run
through high fire-risk spaces, such as machinery rooms and galleys,
unless it is technically impractical to route them otherwise or they
are required to serve circuits in the high-risk area. Cable running
through or into these high-risk areas must meet the requirements of EC
331.
Sec. 113.40-10 [Amended]
60. In Sec. 113.40-10(b), remove ``Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67'' and
add, in its place, ``Type 4 or 4X or IEC IP 56''.
Sec. 113.43-3 [Amended]
61. In Sec. 113.43-3, remove ``Secs. 58.25-45 and 111.93-9'', and
add, in its place, ``part 58, subpart 58.25,''.
Sec. 113.50-5 [Amended]
62. In Sec. 113.50-5(g), remove ``Type 6 or 6P or IEC IP 67'' and
add, in its place, ``Type 4 or 4X or IEC IP 56''.
PART 161--ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
63. The authority citation for part 161 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703, 4302; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801,
3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; 49 CFR 1.46.
Sec. 161.002-1 [Amended]
64. In Sec. 161.002-1(b), in the entry for ABS Rules for Building
and Classing Steel Vessels, remove ``1995'' and add, in its place,
``1996''.
Sec. 161.002-4 [Amended]
65. In Sec. 161.002-4 (b)(3) and (b)(4), remove the words ``ABS
Rules'' and add, in their place, the words ``ABS Rules for Building and
Classing Steel Vessels''.
Dated: April 22, 1997.
J.C. Card,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety
and Environmental Protection.
[FR Doc. 97-11230 Filed 4-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-P
