[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26235-26239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-11973]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 76
[CS Docket No. 96-46; FCC 97-130]
Open Video Systems
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Fourth Report and Order adopts and modifies rules and
policies concerning open video systems. The Fourth Report and Order
amends our regulations to reflect the provisions of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the ``1996 Act'') which pertain to the
filing requirements for certification applications, comments and
oppositions, Notices of Intent and complaints concerning channel
carriage. This item further fulfills Congress' mandate in adopting the
1996 Act and will provide guidance to open video system certification
applicants, open video system operators, video programming providers
and consumers concerning open video systems.
DATES: Effective upon approval of the OMB, but no sooner than June 12,
1997. The Commission will publish a document at a later date notifying
the public as to the effective date. Written comments by the public on
the modified information collections are due on or before June 12,
1997. Written comments must be submitted by OMB on the modified
information collections on or before July 14, 1997.
ADDRESSES: A copy of any comments on the modified information
collections contained herein should be submitted to Dorothy Conway,
Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to dconway@fcc.gov, and to
Timothy Fain, OMB Desk Officer, 10236 NEOB, 725--17th Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to fain_t@al.eop.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn Fleming, Cable Services
Bureau, (202) 418-7200. For additional information concerning the
information collections contained herein contact Dorothy Conway at 202-
418-0217, or via the Internet at dconway@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's
Fourth Report and Order in CS Docket No. 96-46, FCC 97-130, adopted
April 10, 1997 and released April 15, 1997. The full text of this
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business
hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW,
Washington, D.C. 20554, and may be purchased from the Commission's copy
contractor, International Transcription Service, (202) 857-3800, 1919 M
Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20554.
The Fourth Report and Order contains modified information
collections. It has been submitted to OMB for review, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and OMB to comment on the information collections contained in
the Fourth Report and Order. Comments should address: (a) whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
OMB Approval Number: 3060-0700.
Title: Open Video Systems Provisions.
Form Number: FCC Form 1275.
Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
Respondents: Businesses and other for-profit entities; state, local
and tribal governments.
Number of Respondents: 748. (10 OVS operators, 250 video
programming providers that may request additional Notice of Intent
information, file rate complaints, or dispute cases, 60 broadcast
stations that may elect type of carriage and make network non-
duplication notifications, 100 programming providers that may make
notice of invalid rights claimed, 300 must-carry list requesters, 28
oppositions to OVS operator certifications.)
Number of Responses: 3,754. (14 certification filings/refilings,
250 requests for additional Notice of Intent information, 250 responses
to requests for additional Notice of Intent information, 10 Notices of
Intent, 50 rate complaints, 50 rate justifications, 60 carriage
elections, 10 must-carry recordkeepers, 300 must-carry list requests,
300 provisions of must-carry lists, 1,200 notifications of network non-
duplication rights to OVS operators, 100 programming provider
notifications of invalid rights claimed, 1,100 OVS operator
notifications to programming providers, 28 oppositions to
certifications, 20 dispute case complainants, and 20 dispute case
defendants.)
[[Page 26236]]
Estimated Burden to Respondents: Section 76.1502 Certification: We
estimate that prospective OVS operators will make a total of 14
certification filings and refilings on an annual basis. The average
burden to OVS operators for all aspects of each filing and refiling
process, including serving copies to appropriate entities, is estimated
to be 2 hours apiece; therefore 14 filings and refilings x 2 = 28
hours. We estimate there will be an average of 2 oppositions to each
filing and refiling. The average burden entities will undergo in
drafting and filing each opposition with the Commission's Office of the
Secretary and Cable Services Bureaus is estimated to be 4 hours. 14
filings and refilings x 2 oppositions each x 4 hours for each
opposition = 112 hours.
Section 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open
video systems: We currently estimate 10 Notices of Intent will be filed
on an annual basis. The average number of entities that prospective OVS
operators must notify with each Notice of Intent is estimated to be 45.
The average burden for each OVS operator to undergo all aspects of the
Notice of Intent process, including serving copies to all entities is
estimated to be 8 hours; therefore 10 Notices x 8 hours each = 80
hours. We estimate that the number of written requests for additional
information that will be received subsequent to Notices of Intent will
be 25 per Notice of Intent. 10 Notices x 25 requests for additional
information = 250. The average burden to prospective video programming
providers to make each written request is estimated to be 2 hours
apiece; therefore 10 x 25 x 2 = 500 hours. The average burden to
each OVS operator to provide the additional information to the entire
group of prospective video programming providers who requested
additional information is estimated to be 8 hours apiece; therefore 10
Notices x 8 hours = 80 hours.
Section 76.1504 Rates, terms and conditions of carriage on open
video systems: We estimate that video programming providers will file
an average of 5 complaints against each OVS operator per year;
therefore 10 OVS operators x 5 complaints = 50 complaints. We
estimate the average burden to draft and file a complaint is 1 hour;
therefore 50 complaints x 1 hour = 50 hours. We estimate the burden
for OVS operators to undergo all aspects of the rate justification
process to be 20 hours per justification; therefore 10 OVS operators
x 5 justifications x 20 hours for each justification = 1,000 hours.
Section 76.1506 Carriage of television broadcast signals: We
estimate there are 10 OVS operators, each with an estimated average
number of 6 broadcast stations in each OVS operator's area of carriage.
We estimated the average burden to broadcast stations for each election
for must-carry or retransmission consent to be 2 hours per election;
therefore 10 x 6 x 2 hours = 120 hours. The estimated annual
recordkeeping burden for OVS operators to maintain list of broadcast
stations carried in fulfillment of must-carry requirements is 4 hours
per OVS operator; therefore 10 x 4 = 40 hours. The estimated annual
number of written requests received by OVS operators is 30 per OVS
operator; therefore 10 x 30 = 300. The burden for completing written
requests: .25 hours per request; therefore 10 x 30 x .25 = 75
hours. The burden to OVS operators to respond to requests: .25 hours
per request; therefore 10 x 30 x .25 = 75 hours.
Section 76.1508 Network non-duplication, Section 76.1509 Syndicated
program exclusivity: We estimated number of notices to be filed by
television broadcast stations in order to notify OVS operators of
exclusive or non-duplication rights being exercised is 6 stations in
each OVS operator's area of carriage x 20 estimated annual
notifications x 10 OVS operators = 1,200. The burden to television
stations to make notifications is estimated to be .5 hours per notice;
therefore 1,200 x .5 = 600 hours. We estimate the annual number of
notices filed by programming providers to notify OVS operators that the
sports exclusivity rights claimed are invalid to be 100. The burden to
programming providers to make notifications is estimated to be .5 hours
per notice; therefore 100 x .5 hours = 50 hours. The burden for each
OVS operator to make notifications available to all programming
providers on their systems: 1 hour per notification x 1,100
occurrences = 1,100 hours.
Section 76.1513 Dispute resolution: We estimate there will be 20
initial notices filed by complainants annually as well as 20
defendants' responses to notices filed. The average burden for each
notice and response is estimated to be 4 hours apiece; therefore 40 x
4 = 160 hours. We estimate that the 20 annual notices will result in
the initiation of 10 dispute cases. The average burden for complainants
and defendants for undergoing all aspects of the dispute case is
estimated to be 25 hours per case; therefore 20 (10 complainants + 10
defendants) x 25 = 500 hours.
Total Annual Burden to respondents: 4,570 hours, as calculated
above.
Estimated Costs to Respondents: Section 76.1502 Certification:
Costs of stationery, diskettes, and postage at $10 for 14 Form 1275
filings/refilings sent to the Commission and all applicable local
communities = $140. Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for 28
sets of opposition filings = $56.
Section 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open
video systems: Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for (10
Notices of Intent x 45 entities) + 250 requests for additional
information + 250 responses to requests for additional information =
$1,900.
Section 76.1504 Rates, terms and conditions of carriage on open
video systems: Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for 50 rate
complaints + 50 rate justifications = $200.
Section 76.1506 Carriage of television broadcast signals: Costs of
stationery and postage at $2 apiece for 60 carriage elections + 300
requests for lists + 300 provisions of lists = $1,320.
Section 76.1508 Network non-duplication, Section 76.1509 Syndicated
program exclusivity: Costs of stationery and postage at $2 apiece for
1,200 notifications to OVS operators + 100 notifications of invalid
rights claimed + 1,100 OVS operator notifications to programming
providers = $4,800.
Section 76.1513 Dispute resolution: Costs of stationery and postage
at $2 apiece for 20 notices + 20 responses to notices = $80. Costs of
stationery and postage at $10 apiece for 10 complainants in dispute
cases + 10 defendants in dispute cases = $200. $80 + $200 = $280.
Total Annual Cost to respondents: $8,696 as calculated above.
Needs and Uses: The information collections contained herein, which
are necessary to implement the statutory provisions for Open Video
Systems contained in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, have been
previously approved by OMB under OMB control number 3060-0700. The
following summary addresses only changes that have been adopted by the
Commission in its Fourth Report and Order.
I. Introduction
1. On February 8, 1996, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 added
Section 653 to the Communications Act of 1934, establishing open video
systems as a new framework for entry into the video programming
marketplace. Subsequently, the Commission adopted a series of orders
prescribing rules and policies governing the establishment and
operation of open video systems. The Commission has 10 calendar days
from receipt of a complete FCC Form 1275 to issue an order approving or
disapproving the certification. Upon receipt of a complete FCC Form
1275, the Commission will
[[Page 26237]]
publish a notice of the filing in the Daily Digest and post the filing
on the Commission's Internet site. Comments or oppositions to the
certification must be received by the Office of the Secretary within
five days of the applicant's filing and must be served upon the
applicant. The FCC Form 1275 will be deemed approved if the Commission
does not disapprove the filing within the 10 calendar day time period.
If the Commission disapproves the FCC Form 1275, the applicant may file
a revised FCC Form 1275 or refile its original submission with a
statement addressing the issues in dispute as stated in our order
disapproving the filing.
2. Based on the experiences of recent open video system
certification proceedings, we believe that certain modifications to the
open video system procedures will benefit both the parties and the
Commission. The intent of this Fourth Report and Order is to revise our
procedures for both the filing of certification applications and the
filing of comments and oppositions to provide the most efficient
processing of applications for certification, given the limited 10-day
statutory deadline for deciding certification applications.
3. Section 553 of the Administrative Procedures Act (``APA'')
provides that an agency must provide notice of proposed rules in the
Federal Register and afford an opportunity for interested persons to
present their views. However, rules of ``agency organization,
procedure, or practice'' are exempted from the APA's notice and comment
requirement. We find that the changes in the Commission's open video
system procedures proposed in this Fourth Report and Order fit within
this exception because they are purely ministerial and do not alter the
rights of interested parties. The purpose of these changes is to
organize the Commission's internal procedures to provide for a more
efficient processing of applications for certification. Accordingly, we
issue this Fourth Report and Order without providing for a prior notice
and comment period.
II. Certification Application
4. To date, certain certification applications that were submitted
were found to be improperly filed with the Commission because the
accompanying diskettes were not properly formatted. Parties are
reminded that all certification applications must be filed on 3.5
diskettes formatted in an IBM compatible form using Wordperfect 5.1 for
Windows and Excel 4.0 software. Attachments are part of the application
package and, therefore, are subject to the same diskette requirements
as the application, unless technologically infeasible. In addition, we
remind parties that a hard copy and a diskette copy of the FCC Form
1275 and all attachments must be filed with both the Office of the
Secretary and the Office of the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau. In
order to ensure the prompt delivery of the application and related
pleadings to the staff person responsible for its review, parties are
required to attach a cover sheet to the filing and related pleadings
indicating that the submission is either an open video system
certification application or related pleadings. Specifically, for an
open video system certification application, the only wording on this
cover sheet shall be ``Open Video System Certification Application''
and ``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' Similarly, for pleadings
related to an open video system application, the only wording on this
cover sheet shall be ``Open Video System Certification Application
Comments'' and ``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' In either case,
the wording shall be located in the center of the page and should be in
letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. For the purpose of open video
system certification applications and related pleadings, we are also
modifying our mailing address by requiring applications to be filed
with the Office of the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau as well as
with the Office of the Secretary. Parties shall include the words
``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes.
III. Filing Comments or Oppositions
5. In several instances, comments or oppositions filed with the
Office of the Secretary were not also filed with, or served on, the
Cable Services Bureau. Due to the short review period for certification
applications, we now require parties wishing to respond to an FCC Form
1275 filing to submit comments or oppositions simultaneously to the
Office of the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau.
Comments will not be considered timely filed unless filed with both
offices. Untimely filed comments will not be deemed properly filed, and
will not be considered by the Commission.
IV. Calculation of Response Period
6. Under the current rule, comments or oppositions must be filed
within five days of the applicant's filing. The Commission has 10
calendar days from receipt of a complete FCC Form 1275 to issue an
order approving or disapproving the certification. Intermediate
holidays are not counted in determining the commenters' five-day
response period, but are counted in determining the Commission's review
period. These two rules, taken together, could lead to a situation
where the Commission's order could be due on the same day that comments
are due, effectively denying the Commission an opportunity to review
the comments in rendering its decision.
7. Accordingly, in this Fourth Report and Order we now modify this
rule to provide that comments or oppositions must be received by the
Office of the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau
within five calendar days of the applicant's filing and served upon the
applicant. Intermediate holidays (e.g. Saturday, Sunday, and other
officially recognized federal holidays) will be counted in determining
the due date for filing comments and oppositions. If, after making the
necessary calculations, the due date for filing comments falls on a
holiday, comments shall be filed on the next business day before noon,
unless the nearest business day precedes the fifth calendar day
following a filing, in which case the comments will be due on the
preceding business day. We note that this modification of our
computation of time regulations applies solely to the open video system
certification process.
V. Certification Denials
8. If the Commission denies certification to an applicant, the
applicant may file a revised FCC Form 1275 or refile its original
submission with a statement addressing the issues in dispute as stated
in our order disapproving the filing. Applicants to operate an open
video system must serve such refilings on any objecting party from the
previous proceeding and on all local communities in which the applicant
intends to operate. The Commission will consider any revised or refiled
FCC Form 1275 to be a new proceeding. Commenters from the original
proceeding must refile their original comments if they think such
comments should be considered in the subsequent proceeding. All
persons, however, remain free to file new comments in response to a
refiled FCC Form 1275.
VI. Channel Allocation and Carriage Dispute Resolution Proceedings
9. In order to commence the channel allocation process, an operator
is required to file a Notice of Intent with the Commission. The
Commission then releases the Notice of Intent to the public. As part of
that release, the Cable
[[Page 26238]]
Services Bureau is required to publish the Notice on the Internet. In
order to ensure the prompt delivery of such notices to the staff
persons responsible for their review, we now require parties to include
the word ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes. Parties are
also now required to attach a cover sheet to the filing indicating that
the submission is an Open Video System Notice of Intent. Specifically,
for a Notice of Intent, the only wording on this cover sheet shall be
``Open Video System Notice of Intent'' and ``Attention: Cable Services
Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in the center of the page and
should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. Parties shall include
the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes. Parties
shall submit the Notice of Intent and related pleadings simultaneously
to the Office of the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services
Bureau.
10. Additionally, pursuant to Section 653(a)(2) of the 1996
Telecommunications Act, the Commission has the authority to resolve
disputes regarding open video system channel carriage. In order to
conform our procedures for the filing of such complaints with our
procedures for other open video system matters, parties are now
required to include the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing
envelopes. Parties are also now required to submit the complaint and
materials related to these proceedings simultaneously to the Office of
the Secretary and the Office of the Bureau Chief, Cable Services
Bureau. Such pleadings must include a cover sheet indicating that the
submission is either an Open Video System Channel Carriage Complaint or
related pleading. In either case, the only wording on this cover sheet
shall be ``Open Video System Channel Carriage Dispute Resolution'' and
``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in
the center of the page and should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in
size.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
11. The requirements adopted in this Fourth Report and Order have
been analyzed with respect to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
``PRA'') and found to impose modified information collection
requirements on the public. Implementation of any modified requirement
will be subject to approval by the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') as prescribed by the PRA. The Commission, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to comment on the information
collections contained in this Fourth Report and Order as required by
the PRA. Comments should address: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information shall have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the Commission's burden
estimates; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and, (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
12. Written comments must be submitted by the Office of Management
and Budget on the proposed and/or modified information collections on
or before July 14, 1997. A copy of any comments on the information
collections contained herein should be submitted to Dorothy Conway,
Federal Communications Commission, Room 234, 1919 M Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to dconway@fcc.gov. For
additional information concerning the information collections contained
herein contact Dorothy Conway at 202-418-0217, or via the Internet at
dconway@fcc.gov.
VIII. Ordering Clauses
13. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to Section 4(i),
4(j), 303(r), and 653 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47
U.S.C. Secs. 154(i), 154(j), 303(r) and 573 of the rules, requirements
and policies discussed in this order are adopted and Section 76.1502(e)
of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR Sec. 76.1502 is amended as set forth
below.
14. It is further ordered that the requirements and regulations
established in this decision shall become effective upon approval by
OMB of the new information collection requirements adopted herein, but
no sooner than June 12, 1997.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Parts 1 and 76
Cable television.
Federal Communications Commission
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
Rule Changes
Accordingly Parts 1 and 76 of Title 47 are amended as follows:
PART 1--PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
1. The authority citation for Part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 207, 303 and 309(j).
2. Section 1.4 is amended by revising paragraphs (g), (j), and (k)
to read as follows:
Sec. 1.4 Computation of time.
* * * * *
(g) Unless otherwise provided (e.g., Secs. 1.773 and 76.1502(e)(1)
of this chapter), if the filing period is less than 7 days,
intermediate holidays shall not be counted in determining the filing
date.
* * * * *
(j) Unless otherwise provided (e.g. Sec. 76.1502(e) of this
chapter) if, after making all the computations provided for in this
section, the filing date falls on a holiday, the document shall be
filed on the next business day. See paragraph (e)(1) of this section.
(k) Where specific provisions of part 1 conflict with this section,
those specific provisions of part 1 are controlling. See,
e.g.,Secs. 1.45(d), 1.773(a)(3) and 1.773(b)(2). Additionally, where
Sec. 76.1502(e) of this chapter conflicts with this section, those
specific provisions of Sec. 76.1502 are controlling. See e.g. 47 CFR
76.1502(e).
PART 76--CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE
3. The authority citation for Part 76 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154, 301, 302, 303, 303a,
307, 308, 309, 312, 315, 317, 325, 503, 521, 522, 531, 532, 533,
534, 5353, 536, 537, 543, 544, 544a, 545, 548, 552, 554, 556, 558,
560, 561, 571, 572, 573.
4. Section 76.1502 is amended by revising paragraphs (d) and (e),
and adding new paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 76.1502 Certification.
* * * * *
(d) Parties are required to attach a cover sheet to the filing
indicating that the submission is an open video system certification
application. The only wording on this cover sheet shall be ``Open Video
System Certification Application'' and ``Attention: Cable Services
Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in the center of the page and
should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. Parties shall also
include the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelope.
(e) (1) Comments or oppositions to a certification must be filed
within five calendar days of the Commission's receipt of the
certification and must be served on the party that filed the
certification. If, after making the necessary calculations, the due
date for
[[Page 26239]]
filing comments falls on a holiday, comments shall be filed on the next
business day before noon, unless the nearest business day precedes the
fifth calendar day following a filing, in which case the comments will
be due on the preceding business day. For example, if the fifth day
falls on a Saturday, then the filing would be due on that preceding
Friday. However, if the fifth day falls on Sunday, then the filing will
be due on the next day, Monday, before noon (or Tuesday, before noon if
the Monday is a holiday).
(2) Parties wishing to respond to a FCC Form 1275 filing must
submit comments or oppositions with the Office of the Secretary and the
Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau. Comments will not be considered
properly filed unless filed with both of these Offices. Parties are
required to attach a cover sheet to the filing indicating that the
submission is a pleading related to an open video system application,
the only wording on this cover sheet shall be ``Open Video System
Certification Application Comments.'' This wording shall be located in
the center of the page and should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in
size. Parties shall also include the words ``open video systems'' on
their mailing envelopes.
(f) If the Commission does not disapprove the certification
application within ten days after receipt of an applicant's request,
the certification application will be deemed approved. If disapproved,
the applicant may file a revised certification or refile its original
submission with a statement addressing the issues in dispute. Such
refilings must be served on any objecting party or parties and on all
local communities in which the applicant intends to operate. The
Commission will consider any revised or refiled FCC Form 1275 to be a
new proceeding and any party who filed comments regarding the original
FCC Form 1275 will have to refile their original comments if they think
such comments should be considered in the subsequent proceeding.
5. Section 76.1503 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 76.1503 Carriage of video programming providers on open video
systems.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Notification. An open video system operator shall file with the
Secretary of the Federal Communications Commission a ``Notice of
Intent'' to establish an open video system, which the Commission will
release in a Public Notice. Parties are required to attach a cover
sheet to the filing indicating that the submission is an Open Video
System Notice of Intent. The only wording on this cover sheet shall be
``Open Video System Notice of Intent'' and ``Attention: Cable Services
Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in the center of the page and
should be in letters at least \1/2\ inch in size. Parties shall also
include the words ``open video systems'' on their mailing envelopes.
Parties must submit copies of the Notice of Intent with the Office of
the Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau. The Notice
of Intent shall include the following information:
* * * * *
6. Section 76.1513 is amended by adding new paragraphs (d)(8) and
(d)(9) to read as follows:
Sec. 76.1513 Dispute resolution.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(8) Parties are required to submit the complaint and materials
related to these proceedings simultaneously to the Office of the
Secretary and the Bureau Chief, Cable Services Bureau.
(9) Pleadings must include a cover sheet indicating that the
submission is either an Open Video System Channel Carriage Complaint or
related pleading. In either case, the only wording on this cover sheet
shall be ``Open Video System Channel Carriage Dispute Resolution'' and
``Attention: Cable Services Bureau.'' This wording shall be located in
the center of the page and should be in letters at least \1/2\ in size.
Parties shall also include the words ``open video systems'' on their
mailing envelopes.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 97-11973 Filed 5-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
