97-16739. Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan; Indiana  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 123 (Thursday, June 26, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 34406-34408]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-16739]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [IN79-1A; FRL-5848-4]
    
    
    Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plan; Indiana
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is 
    approving a February 5, 1997, request from Indiana, for a State 
    Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the Vanderburgh County ozone 
    nonattainment area. The revision is for a transportation control 
    measure (TCM) to reduce the emissions of volatile organic compounds 
    (VOCs) from motor vehicles by converting city-owned vehicles to 
    compressed natural gas as a fuel. Reductions in VOCs help protect the 
    public's health and welfare by reducing ground level ozone, commonly 
    known as urban smog. High concentrations of ground level ozone can 
    aggravate asthma, cause inflammation of lung tissue, decrease lung 
    function, and impair the body's defenses against respiratory infection.
    
    DATES: This ``direct final'' rule is effective on August 25, 1997, 
    unless USEPA receives written comments that are adverse or critical by 
    July 28, 1997. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be 
    published in the Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents relevant to this action are 
    available for inspection during normal business hours at the following 
    location: Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch, (AR-
    18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
    Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604.
        Please contact Patricia Morris at (312) 353-8656 before visiting 
    the Region 5 office.
        Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
    Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch, (AR-18J), U.S. 
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
    Chicago, Illinois, 60604.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Morris, Environmental 
    Scientist, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
    18J), U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson 
    Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8656.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        Section 108(e) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (Act), 
    provides for transportation-air quality planning guidance for the 
    development and implementation of transportation and other measures 
    necessary to demonstrate and maintain attainment of national ambient 
    air quality standards. Section 108(f)(1)(A) provides a list of 
    transportation control measures with emission reduction potential. The 
    USEPA has further provided guidance in the final report entitled 
    Transportation Control Measures: State Implementation Plan Guidance 
    dated September 1990; and also in Transportation Control Measure 
    Information Documents dated March 1992.
        Section 108(f)(1)(A) of the Act lists sixteen TCMs for 
    consideration by States and planning agencies to use to reduce 
    emissions and help attain and maintain the national ambient air quality 
    standards. Programs to reduce motor vehicle emissions consistent with 
    title II of the Act are listed in section 108(f)(1)(A)(xii).
    
    II. Evaluation of the State Submittal
    
        On February 5, 1997, Indiana submitted to the USEPA a SIP revision 
    request for Vanderburgh County Transportation Control Measures, 
    specifically, a fleet conversion request. A public hearing was held on 
    March 12, 1997, and documentation on the public hearing was submitted 
    to complete the SIP revision request. The SIP submission was found to 
    be complete by the USEPA in a letter dated April 3, 1997.
        The TCM for Vanderburgh County is the conversion of 40-60 city-
    owned vehicles from using gasoline as a fuel to compressed natural gas. 
    This project is consistent with the title II provisions in section 241 
    for clean-fuel vehicles, and is thus consistent with section 
    108(f)(1)(A)(xii) as a program to reduce motor vehicle emissions. 
    Vanderburgh County is currently designated as marginal nonattainment 
    for ozone, but can adopt any and all measures to help reduce ozone 
    precursor pollutants and thus attain and maintain the ozone ambient air 
    quality standard. This TCM is consistent with the measures provided in 
    section 108(f)(1)(A)(xii) of the Act.
        The project was formally endorsed by the Evansville Urban 
    Transportation Study (EUTS) Board at its June 18, 1996, public meeting. 
    EUTS is seeking Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds for 
    the project from the Department of Transportation, to be matched with 
    local money.
        The SIP revision request provides an estimate of the emission 
    reduction for a fuel conversion of 40 light duty vehicles from the city 
    and county fleets to compressed natural gas. The air quality benefits 
    are estimated utilizing emission test results from the California Air 
    Resources Board and, assuming that each vehicle will average 20,000 
    miles of use per year with a five year life cycle. The estimated air 
    quality benefit is calculated as 0.141 tons per year of hydrocarbon 
    emissions, 1.225 tons per year of carbon monoxide emissions, and 0.194 
    tons per year of oxides of nitrogen
    
    [[Page 34407]]
    
    emissions. These pollutants are precursors of ground level ozone or 
    smog, and reductions in precursors will reduce the concentrations of 
    ground level ozone.
        The SIP revision request thus meets the requirements for a TCM, as 
    defined in section 108 of the Act, and meets the requirements for 
    emission reductions to help attain and maintain the national ambient 
    air quality standards.
        As an approved TCM in the SIP for Vanderburgh County, this TCM will 
    need to be included in the transportation improvement program and 
    transportation plan for the area, and tracked and reported for 
    conformity purposes. The requirements for transportation conformity 
    cannot be met unless TCMs in the approved SIP for the area are 
    proceeding according to schedule.
    
    III. USEPA Action
    
        The USEPA approves Indiana's February 5, 1997, SIP revision request 
    to implement the transportation control measure of fleet conversion of 
    city and county vehicles (at least 40) to compressed natural gas as a 
    fuel.
        The USEPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because 
    USEPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
    Register publication, the USEPA is proposing to approve the SIP 
    revision should adverse or critical written comments be filed. This 
    action will be effective on August 25, 1997, unless, by July 28, 1997, 
    adverse or critical written comments on the approval are received.
        If the USEPA receives adverse written comments, the approval will 
    be withdrawn before the effective date by publishing a subsequent 
    rulemaking that will withdraw the final action. All written public 
    comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
    this action serving as a proposed rule. The USEPA will not institute a 
    second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in 
    commenting on this action should do so at this time. If no such 
    comments are received, the public is advised that this action will be 
    effective on August 25, 1997.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing 
    or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any 
    SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered 
    separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental 
    factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory 
    requirements.
    
    IV. Administrative Requirements
    
    A. Executive Order 12866
    
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
    Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
    July 10, 1995, memorandum from Mary D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator 
    for Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. section 600 et seq., 
    USEPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the 
    impact of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 
    sections 603 and 604. Alternatively, USEPA may certify that the rule 
    will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. Small entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit 
    enterprises, and government entities with jurisdiction over populations 
    of less than 50,000.
        SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act 
    do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements 
    that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP 
    approval does not impose any new requirements, the Administrator 
    certifies that it does not have a significant impact on any small 
    entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State 
    relationship under the Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would 
    constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of the 
    State action. The Clean Air Act forbids USEPA to base its actions 
    concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. EPA., 427 U.S. 
    246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
    
    C. Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 
    signed into law on March 22, 1995, USEPA must undertake various actions 
    in association with any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal 
    mandate that may result in estimated costs to state, local, or tribal 
    governments in the aggregate; or to the private sector, of $100 million 
    or more. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under 
    state or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no 
    additional costs to state, local, or tribal governments, or the private 
    sector, result from this action.
    
    D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
    
        Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business 
    Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, USEPA submitted a report 
    containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
    the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the 
    General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's 
    Federal Register. This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
    804(2).
    
    F. Petitions for Judicial Review
    
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by August 25, 1997. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Transportation control measure.
    
        Dated: June 11, 1997.
    Michelle D. Jordan,
    Acting Regional Administrator.
    
        Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart P--Indiana
    
        2. Section 52.777 is amended by adding paragraph (q) to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.777  Control strategy: Photochemical oxidants (hydrocarbons).
    
    * * * * *
        (q) Approval--On February 5, 1997, Indiana submitted a 
    transportation control measure under section 108(f)(1)(A) of the Clean 
    Air Amendments of 1990 for Vanderburgh County, Indiana to aid in 
    reducing emissions of precursors of ozone. The transportation control 
    measure being approved as a revision to the ozone state implementation 
    plan is the conversion
    
    [[Page 34408]]
    
    of at least 40 vehicles from gasoline as a fuel to compressed natural 
    gas.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-16739 Filed 6-25-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
8/25/1997
Published:
06/26/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
97-16739
Dates:
This ``direct final'' rule is effective on August 25, 1997, unless USEPA receives written comments that are adverse or critical by July 28, 1997. If the effective date is delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
34406-34408 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
IN79-1A, FRL-5848-4
PDF File:
97-16739.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.777