[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46208-46211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-23227]
[[Page 46208]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[OR 56-7271; FRL-5884-4]
Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans and
Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes: State of Oregon
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is redesignating the
Portland, Oregon nonattainment area to attainment for the carbon
monoxide (CO) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) and
approving a maintenance plan that will insure that the area remains in
attainment. Under the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1990,
designations can be revised if sufficient data is available to warrant
such revisions. In this action, EPA is approving the Oregon Department
of Environmental Quality's (DEQ's) request because it meets the
redesignation requirements set forth in the CAA. As part of this
action, EPA is approving two related State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions: the 1990 base year emissions inventory, as meeting the
requirements of section 187(a)(1) of the CAA; and the 1991 attainment
year emissions inventory, as meeting the periodic inventory
requirements of section 187(a)(5) of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective as of October 2, 1997.
ADDRESSES: Copies of Oregon's redesignation request and other
information supporting this action are available for inspection during
normal business hours at the following locations: EPA, Office of Air
Quality (OAQ-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101; and
the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 811 SW 6th Avenue,
Portland, Oregon 97204-1390, telephone (503) 229-5696.
Documents which are incorporated by reference are available for
public inspection at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information
Center, EPA, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20460, as well as the
above addresses.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William M. Hedgebeth, Office of Air
Quality (OAQ-107), EPA, Seattle, Washington, (206) 553-7369.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On March 15, 1991, the Governor of Oregon recommended that the
Portland portion of the Portland-Vancouver Air Quality Maintenance Area
be designated as nonattainment for CO as required by section
107(d)(1)(A) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) (Pub. L. 101-
549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q)). The area was
designated nonattainment and classified as ``moderate'' with a design
value less than or equal to 12.7 parts per million (ppm) under the
provisions outlined in sections 186 and 187 of the CAA. (See 56 FR
56694, November 6, 1991, codified at 40 C.F.R. Sec. 81.338). On
September 29, 1995, EPA approved the separation of the Portland-
Vancouver CO nonattainment area into two distinct nonattainment areas,
effective November 28, 1995. Because the Portland area had a design
value of 9.8 ppm (based on 1988-1989 data), the area was considered
moderate. The CAA established an attainment date of December 31, 1995,
for all moderate CO areas. The Portland area has ambient monitoring
data showing attainment of the CO National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) since 1989. On August 30, 1996, Oregon submitted a CO
redesignation request and a CO Maintenance Plan for the Portland area.
Oregon submitted evidence that public hearings were held on May 22,
1996, in Portland, Oregon, and on May 23, 1996, in Tigard, Oregon.
Oregon provided monitoring, modeling, and emissions data to support
its redesignation request. The 1991 CO attainment emissions inventory
totals in tons per day are: Point Sources: 57.97; Area Sources: 205.50;
On-road Mobile Sources: 906.11; and Non-road Mobile Sources: 67.55;
Total Sources: 1237.13 tons per day. The emission budget established
through the year 2007 is as follows:
Portland CO Transportation Emission Budgets
[Thousand pounds per winter day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year.............................. 1991 1995 1997 2001 2003 2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO NONATTAINMENT AREA = METRO BOUNDARY
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget............................ 1812 1217 1076 875 825 775
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CCTMP Sub-Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget............................ 191 123 107 84 78 70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82nd Avenue Corridor Sub-Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Budget............................ 12 7 6 5 4 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oregon relied, in part, on the existence of an approved Inspection
and Maintenance (I/M) program to attain the CO NAAQS, and has
implemented an enhanced I/M program which will help maintain the NAAQS
during the ten-year maintenance period. Oregon also relied on an
oxygenated fuel program to ensure attainment of the NAAQS, although it
is important to note that the CO NAAQS was attained in Portland prior
to the implementation of the oxygenated fuel program in 1992. The
oxygenated fuel program remains part of the maintenance plan during the
first ten-year maintenance period.
A number of other measures have been implemented that have also
helped improve air quality in the Portland CO nonattainment area. The
primary permanent federal measure which has contributed to this
improvement for CO has been the Federal Motor Vehicle Control Program
which has established emission standards for new motor vehicles.
Additional measures implemented by Oregon, Metro, and the City of
Portland which have contributed to the improvement in CO are: major New
Source Review Program (lowest achievable emission rate and offsets);
improved public transit; carpool matching program and carpool parking
program in downtown Portland; traffic flow improvements (ramp metering,
computerized signalization, on-street
[[Page 46209]]
parking limits); City of Portland bicycle parking program; Downtown
Portland Air Quality Plan (1980 Updated Downtown Parking and
Circulation Policy); and the Downtown Portland Parking Offset Program.
It should also be noted that improvements in the air quality in the
Portland metropolitan area were also acknowleged by EPA when it
redesignated the Portland-Vancouver ozone nonattainment area to
attainment on May 19, 1997 (See 62 FR 27204).
The Portland area initially attained the NAAQS for CO in 1990 with
monitored attainment continuing throughout the 1994-1995 CO season.
This was accomplished in spite of rapid population growth in the
Portland area since 1991. In addition, Oregon evaluated Portland area
meteorological patterns over the 1985-1994 period and concluded that
the recent compliance with the CO standards was not attributable to
favorable meteorology.
II. Response To Comments
No comments were received on the June 9, 1997, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in this matter.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the Portland CO Maintenance Plan and Oregon's
request to redesignate the Portland area to attainment of the CO
standard because Oregon's submittal meets the requirements of section
107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. This approval revises the SIP for the Portland
area and assures that the CO standard will be maintained through the
year 2007. Because EPA is approving the Maintenance Plan and because
the area meets CAA requirements for redesignation to attainment, the
Portland area will be designated as attaining the CO NAAQS. EPA is also
approving Oregon's 1990 base year emissions inventory as meeting the
requirements of section 187(a)(1) of the CAA and is approving Oregon's
1991 attainment year emissions inventory as meeting the periodic
inventory requirements of section 187(a)(5) of the CAA.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or
allowing or establishing a precedent for any future request for
revision to any SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be
considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and
environmental factors, and in relation to relevant statutory and
regulatory requirements.
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from E.O. 12866 review.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA
must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of
any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D, of the
Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements but simply approve
requirements that the state is already imposing. Therefore, because the
federal SIP approval does not impose any new requirements, the Regional
Administrator certifies that it does not have a significant impact on
any small entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the
federal-state relationship under the CAA, preparation of a flexibility
analysis would constitute federal inquiry into the economic
reasonableness of state action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base
its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S.
EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
Redesignation of an area to attainment under section 107(d)(3)(E)
of the CAA does not impose any new requirements on small entities.
Redesignation is an action that affects the status of a geographical
area and does not impose any regulatory requirements on sources. The
Regional Administrator certifies that the approval of the redesignation
request will not affect a substantial number of small entities.
C. Unfunded Mandates
Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to state, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100
million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This federal action approves pre-
existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's
Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
E. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by November 3, 1997. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control.
Note: Incorporation by reference of the Implementation Plan for
the State of Oregon was approved by the Director of the Office of
Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
[[Page 46210]]
Dated: August 11, 1997.
Chuck Findley,
Acting Regional Administrator.
PART 52--[AMENDED]
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Subpart MM--Oregon
2. Section 52.1970 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(122) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1970 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(122) On August 30, 1996, the Director of the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality submitted to the Regional Administrator of EPA a
revision to the Carbon Monoxide State Implementation Plan for the
Portland area containing a Maintenance Plan that demonstrated continued
attainment of the NAAQS for carbon monoxide through the year 2007.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter dated August 30, 1996, from Oregon to EPA requesting the
redesignation of the Portland carbon monoxide nonattainment area to
attainment and submitting the Maintenance Plan; Revision to the State
Implementation Plan: Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan and Redesignation
Request for the Portland Metro Area, adopted July 12, 1996.
(B) Letter dated April 17, 1997, from Oregon to EPA submitting
replacement pages to the Maintenance Plan and appendices.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Appendices to the Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request
for Portland (Metro) Area--State Implementation Plan Revision for
Carbon Monoxide, dated July 12, 1996: Appendix D2-1 (Volume 3), CO Air
Monitoring Network; Appendix D2-2 (Volume 3), Meteorological Analysis;
Appendix D2-3 (Volume 3), Review of Bag Study Results Which
Demonstrates The DEQ Network of Sites Records Higher CO Concentrations
Than Screened Intersections; Appendix D2-4 (Volume 3), Emission
Inventory and Forecast Portland (Metro) Area (Carbon Monoxide);
Appendix D2-4-1 (Volume 3), Base Year (1990) Emission Inventory
Portland (Metro) Area (Carbon Monoxide); Appendix D2-4-2 (Volume 3),
Attainment Year (1991) Emission Inventory Portland (Metro) Area (Carbon
Monoxide); Appendix D2-4-3 (Volume 3), Regional Emission Forecast
Portland (Metro) Area; Appendix D2-4-4 (Volume 3), Subregional Emission
Inventories and Forecast Portland (Metro) Area (Carbon Monoxide);
Appendix D2-4-5 (Volume 3), Metro Model Assumptions, Link-Based
Emissions Calculation Methodology, and Travel Demand Forecasting Model
Summary; Appendix D2-5 (Volume 3), Conformity Process; Appendix D2-6
(Volume 3), Historical and Projected Population and Households;
Appendix D2-7 (Volume 3), Metro Council Resolution Concerning Portland
CO Maintenance Plan, Emission Budgets, and Contingency Plan; Appendix
D2-8 (Volume 3), CCTMP Zoning Codes Incorporated Into the Portland
Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan; Appendix D2-9 (Volume 3), Motor
Vehicle Inspection Program Changes; Appendix D2-10 (Volume 3), Land-Use
Measures and TCM Substitution; Appendix D2-11 (Volume 3), New Source
Review Program Changes; Appendix D2-12 (Volume 3), Rollforward
Analysis; Appendix D2-13 (Volume 3), CCTMP Zoning Codes Used as
Supporting Documentation in the Portland Carbon Monoxide Maintenance
Plan; Appendix D2-14 (Volume 3), Miscellaneous Oregon Administrative
Rule Amendments--Supporting Rules, OAR Chapter 340, Section 340-020-
0047 (State of Oregon Clean Air Act Implementation Plan); and Sections
340-031-0520 and 340-031-0530 (Maintenance Area Designation).
PART 81--[AMENDED]
* * * * *
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
2. In Sec. 81.338, the table for ``Oregon-Carbon Monoxide'' is
amended by revising the entry for the Portland area to read as follows:
Sec. 81.338 Oregon.
* * * * *
Oregon-Carbon Monoxide
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation Classification
Designated area ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date\1\ Type Date\1\ Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
*
Portland Area:
Portland Metro Service
District Boundary:
Clackamas County (part).. .................... Attainment.......... .................... ...............
Multnomah County (part).. .................... Attainment.......... .................... ...............
Washington County (part). .................... Attainment.......... .................... ...............
* * * * * *
*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This date is November 15, 1990, unless otherwise noted.
[[Page 46211]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 97-23227 Filed 8-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
