97-29926. Revision to Part 46, Regulations Under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 220 (Friday, November 14, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 60998-60999]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-29926]
    
    
    
    [[Page 60998]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 46
    
    [Docket Number FV97-355]
    
    
    Revision to Part 46, Regulations Under the Perishable 
    Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA)
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is revising the 
    regulations (other than Rules of Practice) Under the Perishable 
    Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA or Act) to establish that electronic 
    transmissions are ``ordinary and usual billing or invoice statements'' 
    within the meaning of the PACA.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: December 15, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles W. Parrott, Assistant Chief, 
    PACA Branch, Room 2095-So. Bldg., Fruit and Vegetable Division, AMS, 
    USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W.,Washington, D.C. 20250, Phone 
    (202) 720-4180.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This regulation is issued under authority of 
    section 15 of the PACA (7 U.S.C. 499o).
    
    Background
    
        The PACA establishes a code of fair trading practices covering the 
    marketing of fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables in interstate and 
    foreign commerce. It protects growers, shippers, distributors, and 
    retailers dealing in those commodities by prohibiting unfair and 
    fraudulent trade practices. Thus, the law fosters an efficient 
    nationwide distribution system for fresh and frozen fruits and 
    vegetables, benefitting the whole marketing chain from farmer to 
    consumer. The PACA provides for a forum to adjudicate commercial 
    disputes in which USDA may award damages against a licensee who fails 
    to meet contractual obligations in violation of the Act. The law also 
    imposes a statutory trust on perishable agricultural commodities 
    received but not yet paid for, products derived from those commodities, 
    and any receivables or proceeds due from the sale of those commodities 
    or products thereof for the benefit of unpaid suppliers or sellers. 
    USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) administers and enforces 
    the PACA.
        The PACA Amendments of 1995, among other things, eliminated the 
    requirement for unpaid produce suppliers to file trust notices with 
    USDA in order to preserve their trust rights under the statutory trust 
    provision of the Act. Additionally, the amendments to the PACA allow 
    unpaid sellers of fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables to preserve 
    trust benefits by adding language to ``ordinary and usual billing or 
    invoice statements'' that advises the buyer of the creditor's intention 
    to preserve trust benefits. This addition of language indicating the 
    intent to preserve trust benefits to bills or invoices eliminates the 
    need for a trust creditor to provide any additional notice to the 
    debtor of the creditor's intention to preserve trust benefits. However, 
    the Act does not explicitly declare that information transmitted in the 
    course of electronic transactions would constitute ``ordinary and usual 
    billing or invoice statements''.
        On January 15, 1997, the United Fresh Fruit and Vegetable 
    Association (UFFVA), a produce industry trade association based in 
    Alexandria, Virginia, petitioned AMS to adopt regulations under the 
    PACA to recognize the use of Electronic Data Interchange. Ten other 
    produce industry organizations joined the UFFVA on the petition. The 
    petitioners sought clarification as to whether EDI transactions are 
    considered by AMS to be ``ordinary and usual billing or invoice 
    statements'' within the meaning of the 1995 PACA amendments. USDA 
    agreed with petitioners that a revision to the regulations would 
    eliminate any uncertainty in this regard and would ensure that 
    licensees can use reasonable technological advances while still 
    receiving appropriate trust protection under the PACA.
        Therefore, USDA proposed a change in the PACA regulations to 
    achieve this end. The proposal was published in the Federal Register on 
    June 20, 1997 (62 FR 33574). The proposal contained a definition for 
    the term ``ordinary and usual billing or invoice statements'' to be 
    added in section 46.46(a) as follows:
    
        ``Ordinary and usual billing or invoice statements'' as used in 
    section 5(c)(4) of the Act and ``invoice or other billing 
    statement'' as used in section 46.46(f)(3) mean communications 
    customarily used between parties to a transaction in perishable 
    agricultural commodities in whatever form, documentary or 
    electronic, for billing or invoicing purposes.
    
        The proposed definition specifies that ``ordinary and usual billing 
    or invoice statements'' as used in the PACA and ``invoice or other 
    billing statement'' as used in section 46.46(f)(3) include both paper 
    documentation and electronic transmissions customarily used between a 
    seller and a buyer for billing or invoicing purposes. This change to 
    the regulations is very similar to the change suggested in the UFFVA 
    petition. The 30-day comment period on the proposed rule closed on July 
    21, 1997.
    
    Comments
    
        USDA received comments on the proposed rule from the American 
    Frozen Food Institute (AFFI), McLean, Virginia; Western Growers 
    Association, Newport Beach, California; Driscoll's Strawberry 
    Associates, Inc., Watsonville, California; and The Nunes Company, Inc., 
    Salinas, California. All of the commentors supported USDA's proposal to 
    amend the regulations to establish that electronic transmissions are 
    ``ordinary and usual billing or invoice statements'' within the meaning 
    of the PACA.
        In its favorable comment, AFFI suggested that in order to clarify 
    and strengthen the proposal, USDA should confirm in the final rule that 
    including a statement on an electronic invoice or other billing 
    document that the sale is subject to the provisions of the PACA 
    statutory trust will satisfy the notice requirements under the statute. 
    AFFI is concerned that the statement preserving trust benefits may not 
    be recognized as a standard data field on an electronic document, and 
    therefore may not be received or read by the party to which the 
    information is being disclosed. However, as we stated in the preamble 
    to the proposed rule, both parties to an electronic transaction must 
    agree to the format of the information to be transmitted and received 
    in an electronic transmission. USDA believes that this agreement is the 
    proper forum for ensuring that the buyer receives notice of trust 
    preservation from the seller in the electronic transmission. The PACA 
    requires that the seller give notice to the buyer in order to preserve 
    its trust benefits. Therefore, a seller engaged in electronic 
    transactions must ensure in the agreement with its buyer that the buyer 
    is receiving the trust statement as part of the electronic 
    transmission. Otherwise, the seller is responsible for finding other 
    means of giving notice to the buyer in order to qualify for PACA trust 
    protection. Under these circumstances, USDA is making no change to the 
    final rule based on this comment.
    
    Executive Orders 12866 and 12988
    
        This rule, issued under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act 
    (7 U.S.C. 499 et seq.), as amended, has been determined to be not 
    significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866.
        This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, 
    Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
    
    [[Page 60999]]
    
    to have retroactive effect. This final rule will not preempt any State 
    or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an 
    irreconcilable conflict with this rule. There are no administrative 
    procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to 
    the provisions of this rule.
    
    Effects on Small Businesses
    
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), USDA has considered the economic 
    impact of this final rule on small entities. The purpose of the RFA is 
    to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such 
    actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or 
    disproportionately burdened. Small agricultural service firms have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. The PACA requires all 
    businesses that operate subject to its provisions maintain a license 
    issued by USDA. There are approximately 15,700 PACA licensees, many of 
    which may be classified as small entities.
        The revised regulations establish that the electronic transmissions 
    used in perishable agricultural commodity transactions are, in fact, 
    ``ordinary and usual billing or invoice statements.'' The use of 
    electronic transactions is voluntary, and the revised regulations 
    specifically provide companies an electronic alternative to paper 
    documentation to give notice of intent to preserve trust rights.
        Accordingly, based on the information in the above discussion, AMS 
    has determined that the provisions of this rule would not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        In compliance with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
    regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which implement the Paperwork Reduction 
    Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13), the information collection and 
    recordkeeping requirements covered by this rule were approved by OMB on 
    October 31, 1996, and expires on October 31, 1999.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 46
    
        Agricultural commodities, Brokers, Penalties, Reporting and record 
    keeping requirements.
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 46 is amended 
    as follows:
    
    PART 46--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for part 46 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: Sec. 15, 46 Stat. 537; 7 U.S.C. 499o
    
        2. In Sec. 46.46, a new paragraph (a)(5) is added to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 46.46  Statutory trust.
    
    * * * * *
        (a) * * *
        (5) ``Ordinary and usual billing or invoice statements'' as used in 
    section 5(c)(4) of the Act, and ``invoice or other billing statement'' 
    as used in Sec. 46.46(f)(3), mean communications customarily used 
    between parties to a transaction in perishable agricultural commodities 
    in whatever form, documentary or electronic, for billing or invoicing 
    purposes.
    
        Dated: November 7, 1997.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 97-29926 Filed 11-13-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
12/15/1997
Published:
11/14/1997
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-29926
Dates:
December 15, 1997.
Pages:
60998-60999 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket Number FV97-355
PDF File:
97-29926.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 46.46