[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 84 (Monday, May 3, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23542-23545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-11035]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[VA-110-FOR]
Virginia Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSM is approving a proposed amendment to the Virginia
permanent regulatory program (hereinafter referred to as the Virginia
program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA). The proposed amendment changes the Virginia Coal Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act to add ``letter of credit'' as an
acceptable form of collateral bond to satisfy the performance bonding
requirements of the Virginia Act. The amendment is intended to revise
the State program to be consistent with the Federal regulations.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 3, 1999.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert A. Penn, Director, Big
Stone Gap Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and
Enforcement, 1941 Neeley Road, Suite 201, Compartment 116, Big Stone
Gap, Virginia 24219, Telephone: (540) 523-4303.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program.
II. Submission of the Amendment.
III. Director's Findings.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments.
V. Director's Decision.
VI. Procedural Determinations.
I. Background on the Virginia Program
On December 15, 1981, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally
approved the Virginia program. You can find background information on
the Virginia program, including the Secretary's findings, the
disposition of comments, and the conditions of approval in the December
15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 61085-61115). You can find later
actions on conditions of approval and program amendments at 30 CFR
946.11, 946.12, 946.13, 946.15, and 946.16.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated July 31, 1997, (Administrative Record Number VA-
921), the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME)
stated that the Virginia legislature has amended, effective July 1,
1997, the Virginia Coal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act at
Section 45.1-241(C). The amendment adds ``letter of credit'' as an
acceptable form of collateral bond that the DMME may accept to satisfy
the performance bonding requirements of the Virginia Act.
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the August 25,
1997, Federal Register (62 FR 44924), invited public comment, and
provided an opportunity for a public hearing on the adequacy of the
proposed amendment. The comment period closed on September 24, 1997. No
one requested to speak at a public hearing, so no hearing was held.
During our review of the amendment, we identified concerns with the
language of the amendment. We notified Virginia of our concerns on
October 20, 1997 (Administrative Record Number VA-932). Virginia
responded to our questions by letter dated October 23, 1997
(Administrative Record Number VA-933).
We reviewed the State's comments and responded to them by letter
dated November 26, 1997 (Administrative Record Number VA-942). In our
response, we asked the State to provide an attorney general's opinion
that cites the statutory and/or regulatory basis for the interpretation
submitted by the DMME in its October 23, 1997, letter. The DMME
obtained an opinion from the Virginia Office of the Attorney General by
Memorandum dated October 27, 1998 (Administrative Record Number VA-
958). By letter dated June 4, 1998 (Administrative Record Number VA-
956) Virginia deleted two sentences that were proposed in the July 31,
1997 submission. In a separate request we asked the DMME whether its
use of the term ``financial institution authorized to do business in
the United States,'' at 45.1-241(C), is consistent with the Federal
regulation at 30 CFR 800.21(b)(1) which states that letters of credit
may be issued only by a bank organized or authorized to do business in
the United States. The DMME responded by letter dated February 23, 1999
(Administrative Record Number VA-972).
III. Director's Findings
Set forth below, pursuant to SMCRA and the Federal regulations at
30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17, are the Director's findings concerning the
proposed amendment to the Virginia program.
As amended, Section 45.1-241(C) of the Virginia Coal Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act provides for letters of credit as follows.
The Director may also accept a letter of credit on certain
designated funds issued by a financial institution authorized to do
business in the United States. The letters of credit shall be
irrevocable, unconditional, shall be payable to the Department upon
demand, and shall afford to the Department protection equivalent to
a corporate surety's bond. The issuer of the letter of credit shall
give prompt notice to the permittee and the Department of any notice
received or action filed alleging the insolvency or bankruptcy of
the issuer, or alleging any violations of regulatory requirements
which could result in suspension or revocation of the issuer's
charter or license to do business. In the event the issuer becomes
unable to fulfill its obligations under the letter of credit for any
reason, the issuer shall immediately notify the permittee and the
Department. Upon the incapacity of an issuer by a reason of
bankruptcy, insolvency or suspension or revocation of its charter or
license, the permittee shall be deemed to be without proper
performance bond coverage and shall promptly notify the Department,
and the Department shall then issue a notice to the permittee
specifying a reasonable period, which shall not exceed ninety days,
to replace the bond coverage. If an adequate bond is not posted by
the end of the period allowed, the permittee shall cease coal
extraction and coal processing operations and shall immediately
begin to conduct reclamation operations in accordance with the
reclamation plan. Coal extraction and coal processing operations
shall not resume until the Department has determined that an
acceptable bond has been posted. If an acceptable bond has not been
posted by the end of the period allowed, the Department may suspend
the permit until acceptable bond is posted. The letter of credit
shall be provided on the form and format established
[[Page 23543]]
by the Director. Nothing herein shall relieve the permittee of
responsibility under the permit or the issuer of liability on the
letter of credit.
After we reviewed the amendment, we made the following comments to
the DMME. First, for letters of credit, there is no requirement that
there be an indemnity agreement for a sum certain executed by the
permittee, as is required by the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
800.5(b). Second, there is no requirement that when a letter of credit
is used as security in areas requiring continuous bond coverage it
shall be forfeited and shall be collected by the regulatory authority
if not replaced by other suitable bond or letter of credit at least 30
days before its expiration date as is required by 30 CFR 800.21(b)(2).
The DMME responded to our comments by letter dated October 23, 1997
(Administrative Record Number VA-933). The DMME explained their
interpretation of the proposed amendment, how the amendment would be
implemented, and why they believe the amendment is consistent with the
Federal standards. The federal definition of ``collateral bond'' at 30
CFR 800.5(b) states that it is ``an indemnity agreement in a sum
certain executed by the permittee as principal'' which then lists types
of collateral, that includes irrevocable letters of credit. Virginia's
proposed statutory amendment does not state that a letter of credit is
a collateral bond nor that the permittee will execute an indemnity
agreement. Virginia's regulatory definition of ``collateral bond'' at 4
VAC 25-130-700.5 also requires an indemnity agreement in a sum certain
executed by the permittee which then lists types of collateral but it
does not include irrevocable letters of credit. The DMME stated that
the Virginia definition of ``collateral bond'' (at 4 VAC 25-130-700.5)
and the Federal definition at 30 CFR 800.5 differ only to the extent
the Virginia definition does not specifically list ``letter of credit''
as a form of collateral bond, while the Federal definition does. The
DMME explained that it omitted references to ``letters of credit'' from
the rule because authority to accept a letter of credit as a
performance bond did not previously exist under the enabling
legislation (45.1-241). Virginia obtained a revision to 45.1-241(C) in
mid-1997. The Virginia Act now provides for the acceptances of
``letters of credit'' as a performance bond. The DMME stated that it
believes that a ``letter of credit'' is a type of collateral bond even
though it is not specifically listed as such in the Virginia rule at
VAC 25-130.700.5. The DMME further stated that since a ``letter of
credit'' is considered to be a collateral bond, the DMME interprets the
standards for collateral bonds to be applicable. The DMME stated,
therefore, that it intends that any ``letter of credit'' accepted as a
performance bond will meet the standards for ``collateral bonds'' and
will be an indemnity agreement in a sum certain executed by the
permittee and deposited with the DMME as is required for collateral
bonds (Administrative Record No. VA-933). Also, Virginia's proposed
amendment to its statute and its existing regulation concerning
collateral bonds at 4 VAC 25-130-800.21 lacks a counterpart to the
Federal requirements concerning collateral bonds at 30 CFR
800.21(b)(2). Section 800.21(b)(2) requires that thirty days before the
letter of credit expires that it be replaced with another bond or be
forfeited. The DMME explained that the enabling statutory revision to
45.1-241(C) does provide DMME with the authority to collect the
proceeds from a letter of credit should the term of the letter of
credit expire before the bond is replaced or released. Section 45.1-
241(C) specifies that the letter of credit ``shall be payable to the
Department upon demand.'' The DMME stated that it will interpret the
phrase ``shall be payable to the Department upon demand'' as Virginia's
``intent to demand payment at least 30 days prior to an expiration date
of such a letter of credit.'' (Admin. record no. VA-933).
We reviewed the DMME's interpretation, and in our response, we
asked the State to provide an attorney general's opinion that cites the
statutory and/or regulatory basis for the interpretation submitted by
the DMME in its October 23, 1997, letter. By memorandum dated October
27, 1998 (Administrative Record Number VA-958) the Virginia Attorney
General's Office provided the DMME with its opinion that the provisions
of Section 45.1-241.C, Code of Virginia, are consistent with the
requirements of the Federal surface mining program. That opinion
further states that Section 45.1-241.C may be implemented by the
Virginia Division of Mined Land Reclamation (DMLR) in a manner
consistent with both the Federal and Virginia program bonding
requirements under the authority of Section 45.1-230, Code of Virginia.
Finally, Virginia's statute states that a letter of credit may be
accepted on certain designated funds issued by a financial institution
authorized to do business in the United States. We asked the DMME
whether its use of the term ``financial institution authorized to do
business in the United States,'' at 45.1-241(C), is consistent with the
Federal regulation at 30 CFR 800.21(b)(1) which states that letters of
credit may be issued only by a bank organized or authorized to do
business in the United States. In its response, the DMME stated that
its intention is to apply all the criteria specified at subsection (b),
including (b)(1).
We find that the amendments to Section 45.1-241(C) concerning
letters of credit are not inconsistent with SMCRA and can be approved.
We are making this finding and approving the amendment to (1) the
extent that Virginia will implement this amendment as it stated in its
letters dated October 23, 1997, and February 23, 1999, and (2) to the
extent that a bank issues letters of credit. In addition, and as we
discussed above, the Virginia program regulations lack certain
counterparts to the Federal provisions concerning letters of credit at
30 CFR 800.5(b)(4) and 800.21(b)(2). Specifically, Virginia's
definition of ``collateral bond'' at 4 VAC 25-130-700.5 lacks a
counterpart to the letter of credit provision in the Federal definition
of ``collateral bond'' at 30 CFR 800.5(b)(4). Also, Virginia's
regulation concerning collateral bonds at 4 VAC 25-130-800.21 lacks a
counterpart to the Federal requirements concerning collateral bonds at
30 CFR 800.21(b)(2). Lastly, Virginia's use of the term ``financial
institution'' needs to be amended or defined so that letters of credit
are only issued by banks organized or authorized to transact business
in the United States as required in 30 CFR 800.5(b)(4) and
800.21(b)(2). Therefore, we are requiring that the Virginia program
regulations be further amended, or the Virginia program be otherwise
amended, to be no less effective than the Federal regulations
concerning letters of credit at 30 CFR 800.5(b)(4) and 800.21(b)(2).
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Federal Agency Comments
Pursuant to section 503(b) of SMCRA and 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(I),
comments were solicited from various interested Federal agencies. The
U.S. Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA)
responded (Administrative Record Number VA-924) and recommended that
the proposed language be denied. MSHA stated that the proposed changes
do not appear to offer the financial surety of the present system. MSHA
stated that a letter of credit does not reflect the financial solvency
sufficient for the authorization of surety and could be obtained under
inflated values of
[[Page 23544]]
property, equipment, or other collateral. Completion of reclamation
operations after mining is completed or reimbursement to the State, if
the bond is forfeited, seems more a positive objective under the
present system, MSHA stated.
The Director does not concur with the concern. The Director notes
that the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 800.5(b) and 800.21(b)(2)
authorized the use of letters of credit as a form of collateral bond to
meet the performance bond requirements of 30 CFR 800.11. If a letter of
credit bond is forfeited, the bank must pay the bond amount to the
regulatory authority.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) responded
(Administrative Record Number VA-923). USFWS stated that the proposed
amendment is not likely to adversely affect Federally listed species or
designated critical habitat in Virginia.
Public Comments
The Virginia Department of Historic Resources commented and stated
that it finds that the amendments submitted by the DMME will not affect
historic properties.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), the Director is required to obtain
the written concurrence of the Administrator of the EPA with respect to
any provisions of a State program amendment that relate to air or water
quality standards promulgated under the authority of the Clean Water
Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et
seq.). The Director has determined that this amendment contains no
provisions in these categories and that EPA's concurrence is not
required.
Pursuant to 732.17(h)(11)(I), OSM solicited comments on the
proposed amendment from EPA. The EPA did not provide any comments.
V. Director's Decision
Based on the findings above we are approving Virginia's amendment
concerning letters of credit as submitted by letter dated July 31,
1997, amended by letter dated June 4, 1998, and clarified by letters
dated October 23, 1997 and February 23, 1999, and Memorandum dated
October 27, 1998. We are approving this amendment to the extent that
Virginia will implement this amendment as it stated in its letters
dated October 23, 1997, and February 23, 1999, and to the extent that a
bank issues letters of credit. In addition, we are requiring that the
Virginia program regulations be further amended, or the Virginia
program be otherwise amended, to be no less effective than the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 800.5(b), and 30 CFR 800.21(b)(2) concerning
letters of credit.
The Federal regulations at 30 CFR Part 946 codifying decisions
concerning the Virginia program are being amended to implement this
decision. This final rule is being made effective immediately to
expedite the State program amendment process and to encourage States to
bring their programs into conformity with the Federal standards without
undue delay. Consistency of State and Federal standards is required by
SMCRA.
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review).
Executive Order 12988
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has
determined that, to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section.
However, these standards are not applicable to the actual language of
State regulatory programs and program amendments since each such
program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM.
Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30
CFR 730.11, 732.15 and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State
regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must
be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is
consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and
whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
National Environmental Policy Act
No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since
section 702(d) of SMCRA [30 U.S.C. 1292(d)] provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any
given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 946
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: April 16, 1999.
Allen D. Klein,
Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 30, Chapter VII,
Subchapter T of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as set forth
below:
PART 946--VIRGINIA
1. The authority citation for Part 946 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. Section 946.15 is amended in the table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ``Date of Final Publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 946.15 Approval of Virginia regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
[[Page 23545]]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of final
Original amendment submission date publication Citation/description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
July 31, 1997....................... May 3, 1999........... Code of Virginia at Sec. 45.1-241(C) concerning letter of credit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Section 946.16 is amended by amending paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Section 946.16 Required regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
(a) By July 2, 1999, Virginia must submit either a proposed
amendment or a description of an amendment to be proposed, together
with a timetable for adoption, to revise the Virginia program
regulations, or otherwise amend the Virginia program, to be no less
effective than the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 800.5(b), and 30 CFR
800.21(b)(2) concerning letters of credit.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 99-11035 Filed 4-30-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P
