99-11977. Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Increase in Assessment Rate  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 12, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 25419-25422]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-11977]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Rules and Regulations
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
    week.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 12, 1999 / Rules 
    and Regulations
    
    [[Page 25419]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 989
    
    [Docket No. FV99-989-2 FIR]
    
    
    Raisins Produced From Grapes Grown in California; Increase in 
    Assessment Rate
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (Department) is adopting, as a 
    final rule, without change, the provisions of an interim final rule 
    which increased the assessment rate established under the Federal 
    marketing order for California raisins (order) from $5.00 to $8.50 per 
    ton for raisins acquired by handlers for the 1998-99 and subsequent 
    crop years. The order regulates the handling of raisins produced from 
    grapes grown in California and is administered locally by the Raisin 
    Administrative Committee (Committee). Authorization to assess raisin 
    handlers enables the Committee to incur expenses that are reasonable 
    and necessary to administer the program. The crop year runs from August 
    1 through July 31. The 1998-99 crop is smaller than initially 
    estimated. Further, for this crop year, volume regulation has only been 
    applied to one minor varietal type of raisin. As a result, some 
    expenses paid by assessments have increased. The $5.00 per ton 
    assessment rate would not have generated enough revenue to cover 
    expenses. The $8.50 per ton assessment rate will remain in effect 
    indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: June 11, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maureen T. Pello, Marketing 
    Specialist, California Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, suite 102B, Fresno, 
    California 93721; telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or 
    George Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration 
    Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, room 2525-S, P.O. Box 
    96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, or Fax: 
    (202) 720-5698. Small businesses may request information on complying 
    with this regulation, or obtain a guide on complying with fruit, 
    vegetable, and specialty crop marketing agreements and orders by 
    contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, room 2525-S, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-
    5698, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov. You may view the marketing 
    agreement and order small business compliance guide at the following 
    web site: http://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement and Order No. 989 (7 CFR part 989), both as amended, 
    regulating the handling of raisins produced from grapes grown in 
    California, hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is 
    effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as 
    amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
        The Department is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive 
    Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, California 
    raisin handlers are subject to assessments. It is intended that the 
    assessment rate as issued herein will apply to all assessable raisins 
    beginning August 1, 1998, the beginning of the 1998-99 crop year, and 
    continue in effect until amended, suspended, or terminated. This rule 
    will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, 
    unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing, the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction in equity to review the 
    Secretary's ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not 
    later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        This rule continues to increase the assessment rate established 
    under the order for the 1998-99 and subsequent crop years from $5.00 to 
    $8.50 per ton of raisins acquired by handlers. Authorization to assess 
    raisin handlers enables the Committee to incur expenses that are 
    reasonable and necessary to administer the program. The 1998-99 crop is 
    smaller than initially estimated. Further, for this crop year, volume 
    regulation has been applied to only one minor varietal type of raisin. 
    As a result, some expenses paid by assessments have increased. The 
    $5.00 per ton rate of assessment would not have generated enough 
    revenue to cover expenses. This action was unanimously recommended by 
    the Committee at a meeting on January 15, 1999.
        Sections 989.79 and 989.80, respectively, of the Federal order for 
    California raisins provide authority for the Committee, with the 
    approval of the Department, to formulate an annual budget of expenses 
    and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The 
    members of the Committee are producers and handlers of California 
    raisins. They are familiar with the Committee's needs and with the 
    costs for goods and services in their local area and are thus in a 
    position to formulate an appropriate budget and assessment rate. The 
    assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a public meeting. Thus, 
    all directly affected persons have an opportunity to participate and 
    provide input.
        An assessment rate of $5.00 per ton for raisins acquired by 
    handlers had been in effect under the Federal order since the 1996-97 
    crop year (61 FR 52684; October 8, 1996). Regarding the 1998-99 crop 
    year, the Committee met
    
    [[Page 25420]]
    
    on August 13, 1998, and recommended administrative expenditures of 
    $1,655,000 for the year. Major administrative expenditures included 
    $545,500 for export program administration and related activities; 
    $478,000 for salaries; and $100,000 for compliance activities. These 
    expenditures were approved by the Department on August 18, 1998. At 
    that time, the Committee estimated the crop at about 321,400 tons, and 
    anticipated that 333,000 tons of raisins would be acquired by handlers 
    during the 1998-99 crop year (included about 59,800 tons of 1997 
    reserve raisins sold to handlers for free use). The $5.00 per ton 
    assessment rate was expected to generate $1,665,000 in revenue which 
    would have allowed the Committee to meet its administrative expenses.
        Section 989.79 of the order also provides authority for the 
    Committee to formulate an annual budget of expenses likely to be 
    incurred during the crop year in connection with reserve raisins held 
    for the account of the Committee. A certain percentage of each year's 
    raisin crop may be held in a reserve pool during years when volume 
    regulation is implemented to help stabilize raisin supplies and prices. 
    The remaining ``free'' percentage may be sold by handlers to any 
    market. Reserve raisins are disposed of through various programs 
    authorized under the order. Reserve pool expenses are deducted from 
    proceeds obtained from the sale of reserve raisins. Net proceeds are 
    returned to the pool's equity holders, primarily producers.
        At its August 1998 meeting, the Committee recommended a 1998-99 
    reserve pool budget of $2,941,500. Major pool expenses included 
    $1,050,000 for insurance and repair of bins for storing reserve 
    raisins; $545,500 for export program administration and related 
    activities; $462,000 for salaries; and $235,000 for compliance 
    activities.
        Adverse crop conditions during the spring of 1998 created by the 
    weather phenomenon known as El Nino, combined with scattered rain and a 
    labor shortage during harvest contributed to a smaller 1998-99 raisin 
    crop than initially anticipated. Also, reserve pools were initially 
    established in October 1998 for five of the nine varietal types of 
    raisins covered under the order--Natural (sun-dried) Seedless 
    (Naturals), Zante Currants (Zantes), Dipped Seedless, Oleate and 
    Related Seedless, and Other Seedless--when the Committee computed and 
    announced preliminary free and reserve marketing percentages pursuant 
    to Sec. 989.54. In November 1998, the Committee determined that volume 
    regulation was not warranted for Dipped Seedless, Oleate and Related 
    Seedless, and Other Seedless raisins.
        The Committee met on January 15, 1999, to review crop conditions, 
    its financial situation, and various marketing order programs. The 
    Committee reduced its production estimate from 321,000 to 276,500 tons, 
    and reduced its estimate of assessable tonnage from 333,000 to 315,000 
    tons. The Committee also determined that volume regulation was not 
    warranted for Naturals and all other varietal types, but was warranted 
    for Zantes, for the 1998-99 crop year. This is the first time in 16 
    years that volume regulation for Naturals was not implemented.
        With a smaller 1998 crop, reduced estimate of assessable tonnage, 
    and volume regulation only warranted for Zantes, the Committee 
    recommended revising its administrative and reserve pool budgets. The 
    1998 reserve pool budget was reduced from $2,941,500 to $25,000 which 
    should cover operating expenses for Zante reserve raisins. In addition, 
    $975,000 initially budgeted for 1998 reserve pool operating expenses 
    were applied to the existing 1997 Natural and Zante reserve pool 
    budgets. Included in the $975,000 is $683,000 which is being utilized 
    for export program administration.
        The Committee also reviewed and identified those expenses that were 
    considered reasonable and appropriate to continue the raisin marketing 
    order program, without a significant reserve pool. The expenses that 
    were associated with the initial reserve pool budget were modified and 
    adjusted as appropriate and included in the administrative budget. For 
    example, salaries, payroll taxes, retirement contributions, insurance, 
    rent for office space, telephone, and other administrative items are 
    usually split between the Committee's administrative and reserve 
    budgets. Although the 1998 crop is reduced, the Committee needs to 
    maintain its staff to administer the order and ongoing export programs.
        Many operating expenses were adjusted from the Committee's initial 
    administrative and reserve budgets, such as for overall compliance 
    ($335,000 to $200,000), overall auditing fees ($35,000 to $10,000), 
    overall printing ($20,000 to $17,000), and overall Committee meetings 
    ($24,000 to $20,000). Ultimately, the Committee recommended increasing 
    its administrative expenses from $1,665,000 to $2,677,500, which 
    included an additional $1,012,500 in operating expenses initially 
    associated with the 1998 reserve budget. Major expenses to be funded 
    through handler assessments now include $940,000 in salaries; $408,000 
    for export program administration; $200,000 for compliance activities; 
    $150,000 for Committee travel; and $140,000 for membership dues and 
    surveys.
        The Committee recommended increasing its assessment rate from $5.00 
    to $8.50 per ton of raisins acquired by handlers. The $8.50 per ton 
    assessment rate when applied to anticipated acquisitions of 315,000 
    tons will yield $2,677,500 in assessment income which will be adequate 
    to cover anticipated administrative expenses. Authority for the 
    Committee to recommend an increase in the assessment rate during a crop 
    year to obtain sufficient funds to meet expenses is provided in 
    Sec. 989.80(c) of the order. Any unexpended assessment funds from the 
    crop year are required to be credited or refunded to the handlers from 
    whom collected, as provided in Sec. 989.81(a) of the order.
        The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in 
    effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by the 
    Secretary upon recommendation and information submitted by the 
    Committee or other available information. Although this assessment rate 
    is effective for an indefinite period, the Committee will continue to 
    meet prior to or during each crop year to recommend a budget of 
    expenses and consider recommendations for modification of the 
    assessment rate. The dates and times of Committee meetings are 
    available from the Committee or the Department. Committee meetings are 
    open to the public and interested persons may express their views at 
    these meetings. The Department will evaluate Committee recommendations 
    and other available information to determine whether modification of 
    the assessment rate is needed. Further rulemaking will be undertaken as 
    necessary. The Committee's 1998-99 revised budget and those for 
    subsequent crop years will be reviewed and, as appropriate, approved by 
    the Department.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
    prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that 
    they are brought about
    
    [[Page 25421]]
    
    through group action of essentially small entities acting on their own 
    behalf. Thus, both statutes have small entity orientation and 
    compatibility.
        There are approximately 20 handlers of California raisins who are 
    subject to regulation under the order and approximately 4,500 raisin 
    producers in the regulated area. Small agricultural service firms have 
    been defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as 
    those having annual receipts of less than $5,000,000, and small 
    agricultural producers are defined as those having annual receipts of 
    less than $500,000. No more than 7 handlers, and a majority of 
    producers, of California raisins may be classified as small entities. 
    Thirteen of the 20 handlers subject to regulation have annual sales 
    estimated to be at least $5,000,000, and the remaining 7 handlers have 
    sales less than $5,000,000, excluding receipts from any other sources.
        This rule continues to increase the assessment rate established 
    under the Federal order for the 1998-99 and subsequent crop years, as 
    specified in Sec. 989.347, from $5.00 to $8.50 per ton of raisins 
    acquired by handlers. The order regulates the handling of raisins 
    produced from grapes grown in California and is administered locally by 
    the Committee. Authorization to assess raisin handlers enables the 
    Committee to incur expenses that are reasonable and necessary to 
    administer the program. The 1998-99 crop is smaller than initially 
    estimated due to adverse weather conditions and a labor shortage during 
    harvest. Further, for this crop year, volume regulation has been 
    applied to only one minor varietal type of raisin. As a result, some 
    expenses paid by assessments have increased. The $5.00 per ton rate of 
    assessment would not have generated enough revenue to cover expenses.
        With a smaller crop, reduced estimate of assessable tonnage, and 
    volume regulation only warranted for Zantes, the Committee recommended 
    revising its administrative and reserve pool budgets. The 1998 reserve 
    pool budget was reduced from $2,941,500 to $25,000 which should cover 
    operating expenses for Zante Currant reserve raisins. In addition, 
    $975,000 initially budgeted for 1998 reserve pool operating expenses 
    were applied to the existing 1997 Natural and Zante reserve pool 
    budgets. Included in the $975,000 is $683,000 which is being utilized 
    for export program administration.
        The Committee also reviewed and identified those expenses that were 
    considered reasonable and appropriate to continue the raisin marketing 
    order program, without a significant reserve pool. Those expenses that 
    were associated with the initial reserve pool budget were modified and 
    adjusted as appropriate and included in the administrative budget. For 
    example, salaries, payroll taxes, retirement contributions, insurance, 
    rent for office space, telephone, and other administrative items are 
    usually split between the Committee's administrative and reserve 
    budgets. Although the 1998 crop is reduced, the Committee needs to 
    maintain its staff to administer the order and ongoing export programs. 
    Many operating expenses were adjusted from the Committee's initial 
    administrative and reserve budgets. These included adjustments for 
    overall compliance ($335,000 to $200,000), overall auditing fees 
    ($35,000 to $10,000), overall printing ($20,000 to $17,000), and 
    overall Committee meetings ($24,000 to $20,000). Ultimately, the 
    Committee recommended increasing its administrative expenses from 
    $1,665,000 to $2,677,500, which included an additional $1,012,500 in 
    operating expenses initially associated with the 1998 reserve budget.
        The $8.50 per ton assessment rate, when applied to anticipated 
    acquisitions of 315,000 tons, will yield $2,677,500 in revenue and 
    allow the Committee to meet expenses, which include $940,000 for 
    salaries; $408,000 for export program administration; $200,000 for 
    compliance activities; $150,000 for Committee travel; and $140,000 for 
    membership dues and surveys. Authority for the Committee to incur 
    expenses, generate revenue by assessing raisin handlers, and increase 
    the assessment rate during a crop year is provided in Secs. 989.79 and 
    989.80 of the order, respectively.
        Regarding the impact of this rule on handlers and producers, while 
    assessments impose some additional costs on handlers, the costs are 
    minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the additional costs may 
    be passed on to producers. However, these costs are offset by the 
    benefits derived by the operation of the marketing order. With the 
    1998-99 producer price for Naturals, the major raisin varietal type 
    covered under the order, averaging $1,290 per ton of raisins acquired, 
    estimated assessment revenue for the 1998-99 crop year as a percentage 
    of total producer revenue is expected to be less than 1 percent. The 
    increased assessment rate allows the Committee to meet its expenses and 
    continue program operations. Any unexpended assessment funds from the 
    crop year are required to be credited or refunded to the handlers from 
    whom collected, as provided in Sec. 989.81(a) of the order.
        The Committee considered some alternatives to the recommended 
    action. The Committee's Audit Subcommittee formed a working group which 
    held a meeting on December 16, 1998, to discuss revisions to the 
    budget. The Audit Subcommittee held a follow-up meeting on January 6, 
    1999. Alternatives discussed at these meetings were based on the 
    assumption that no volume regulation would be in effect for any 
    varietal type of California raisins for the remainder of the crop year. 
    Accordingly, one option considered was to have the 1998 administrative 
    budget absorb all of the operating costs that are typically split 
    between the administrative and reserve pool budgets, and increase the 
    assessment rate to $11.50 per ton of raisins acquired to cover these 
    costs. However, the majority of subcommittee members determined that 
    the increase in expenses would be funded more appropriately with 1998-
    99 handler assessments and proceeds from the anticipated 1998 reserve 
    pool for Zantes, and the existing 1997 reserve pools for Naturals and 
    Zantes, respectively.
        The working group and subcommittee members also considered various 
    scenarios regarding the itemized expenses, estimate of assessable 
    tonnage, and necessary assessment income. Ultimately, the Committee 
    determined that volume regulation was only warranted for Zantes, that 
    administrative expenses should be increased to $2,677,500, that the 
    estimate of assessable tonnage should be reduced from 333,000 to 
    315,000 tons, and that the assessment rate should be increased to $8.50 
    per ton of raisins acquired by handlers.
        This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping 
    requirements on either small or large raisin handlers. As with all 
    Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically 
    reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry 
    and public sector agencies. Finally, the Department has not identified 
    any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with 
    this rule.
        In addition, the Committee's working group meeting on December 16, 
    1998, subcommittee meeting on January 6, 1999, and the Committee 
    meeting on January 15, 1999, where this action was deliberated were 
    public meetings widely publicized throughout the raisin industry. All 
    interested persons were invited to attend the meetings and participate 
    in the industry's deliberations.
        An interim final rule concerning this action was published in the 
    Federal
    
    [[Page 25422]]
    
    Register on February 24, 1999 (64 FR 9053). Copies of the rule were 
    mailed to all Committee members and alternates, the Raisin Bargaining 
    Association, handlers, and dehydrators. In addition, the rule was made 
    available through the Internet by the Office of the Federal Register. 
    That rule provided for a 60-day comment period which ended April 26, 
    1999. No comments were received.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is found that 
    this rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the 
    declared policy of the Act.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 989
    
        Grapes, Marketing agreements, Raisins, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements.
    
    PART 989--RAISINS PRODUCED FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
    
        Accordingly, the interim final rule amending 7 CFR part 989 which 
    was published at 64 FR 9053 on February 24, 1999, is adopted as a final 
    rule without change.
    
        Dated: May 5, 1999.
    Robert C. Keeney,
    Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 99-11977 Filed 5-11-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
6/11/1999
Published:
05/12/1999
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-11977
Dates:
June 11, 1999.
Pages:
25419-25422 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV99-989-2 FIR
PDF File:
99-11977.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 989.80(c)