99-23895. Section 8 Tenant-Based Assistance Programs Statutory Merger of Section 8 Certificate and Voucher Programs; Correction  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 177 (Tuesday, September 14, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 49656-49659]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-23895]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
    
    24 CFR Part 982
    
    [Docket No. FR-4428-C-03]
    RIN 2577-AB91
    
    
    Section 8 Tenant-Based Assistance Programs Statutory Merger of 
    Section 8 Certificate and Voucher Programs; Correction
    
    AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
    Housing, HUD.
    
    ACTION: Correction.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document makes various corrections to HUD's May 14, 1999 
    interim rule amending the regulations for the Section 8 tenant-based 
    rental voucher program. The interim rule implemented most of the 
    Section 8 tenant-based program provisions contained in the Quality 
    Housing and Work Responsibility Act of 1998 (the ``Public Housing 
    Reform Act''). Of particular significance, the May 14, 1999 interim 
    rule implemented section 545 of the Public Housing Reform Act. Section 
    545 provides for the complete merger of the Section 8 tenant-based 
    Certificate and Voucher programs. The purpose of this document is to 
    make
    
    [[Page 49657]]
    
    various corrections to the May 14, 1999 interim rule.
    
    DATES: Effective Date: October 1, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gerald J. Benoit, Director, Real 
    Estate and Housing Performance Division, Office of Public and Indian 
    Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Room 4210, 451 
    Seventh Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-0477, 
    extension 4069 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing or speech 
    impaired individuals may access this number via TTY by calling the 
    toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. HUD's May 14, 1999 Interim Rule
    
        On May 14, 1999 (64 FR 26632), HUD published for public comment an 
    interim rule amending the regulations for the Section 8 tenant-based 
    rental voucher program.
        The interim rule implemented most of the Section 8 tenant-based 
    program provisions contained in the Quality Housing and Work 
    Responsibility Act of 1998 (Pub.L. 105-276, approved October 21, 1998; 
    112 Stat. 2461) (the ``Public Housing Reform Act''). Of particular 
    significance, the May 14, 1999 interim rule implemented section 545 of 
    the Public Housing Reform Act, which provides for the complete merger 
    of the Section 8 tenant-based Certificate and Voucher programs. 
    Accordingly, the May 14, 1999 established a new merged program known as 
    the Housing Choice Voucher program.
        HUD had previously promulgated regulations (known as the 
    ``conforming rule'') which combined and conformed rules for Section 8 
    tenant-based assistance to the extent permitted by prior law. The new 
    Housing Choice Voucher program has features of the previously 
    authorized certificate and voucher programs plus new features, as 
    described in the preamble to the interim rule.
        The May 14, 1999 interim rule provided for a 90-day delayed 
    effective date for the interim rule (in contrast to the customary 30-
    day delayed effective date for most HUD rules issued for effect), in 
    order to afford public housing agencies (PHAs) additional time to 
    prepare for the implementation of the interim rule. The interim was 
    scheduled to become effective on August 12, 1999.
        On August 11, 1999 (64 FR 43613), HUD published a notice in the 
    Federal Register delaying the effective date of the May 14, 1999 
    interim rule until October 1, 1999. HUD decided to delay the effective 
    date in order to provide decided to delay the effective date until 
    October 1, 1999, to allow PHAs more time to prepare for implementation 
    of the Housing Choice Voucher Program and to allow PHAs to revise their 
    computer software to accommodate the new subsidy formula.
    
    II. This Document
    
        The purpose of this document is to make various corrections to the 
    May 14, 1999 interim rule. The major corrections made by this document 
    are as follows:
        1. Definition of ``merger date.'' The definition of ``merger date'' 
    in Sec. 982.4 is corrected to specify that this term means October 1, 
    1999, the delayed effective date of the interim voucher merger rule 
    pursuant to HUD's August 11, 1999 Federal Register notice.
        2. Use of ``family size'' to determine initial eligibility. Section 
    982.201(b)(4) is corrected to specify that the PHA must use the income 
    limit ``for the family size'' to determine initial eligibility at 
    admission to the program. The published rule incorrectly indicated that 
    the PHA should use the ``family unit size'' for this purpose (emphasis 
    supplied). ``Family unit size'' is used to determine the appropriate 
    unit size and maximum subsidy for a family, not to determine 
    eligibility for admission to the program.
        3. Screening of family behavior. Section 982.307(a)(1) of the 
    published rule provides that the PHA may opt to screen ``family 
    behavior'' or suitability for tenancy. This provision is intended to 
    implement section 8(o)(6)(B) of the United States Housing Act of 1937 
    (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(6)(B)) (the ``1937 Act''), as amended by section 
    545 of the Public Housing Reform Act, which provides that a PHA ``may 
    elect to screen applicants for the program. . . .'' The interim rule is 
    corrected:
         To clarify, as originally intended (see the interim rule 
    preamble discussion at 64 FR 26632), that Sec. 982.307(a)(1) is only 
    intended to authorize PHA screening of program applicants, not to 
    authorize PHA screening of a program participant seeking to move to 
    another unit (either within the PHA jurisdiction or under portability 
    procedures) (Sec. 982.307(a)(1)).
         To specify that such PHA screening of program applicants 
    must be ``in accordance with policies stated in the PHA administrative 
    plan'' (Sec. 982.307(a)(1)).
         To add a reference to such PHA screening in the regulation 
    that lists PHA policies that must be included in the administrative 
    plan (Sec. 982.54(d)(23)).
         To add a conforming provision which clarifies that the PHA 
    may at any time deny program assistance for an applicant in accordance 
    with the PHA administrative plan policy on screening of applicants for 
    family behavior or suitability for tenancy (Sec. 982.552(e)).
        4. Approval of acceptability criteria variations. Section 
    982.401(a)(4)(iii)(A) is revised to correct the description of 
    requirements for approval of acceptability criteria variations in 
    accordance with section 8(o)(8)(B) of the 1937 Act. The corrected rule 
    specifies that HUD may approve variations that meet or exceed the 
    ``performance requirements,'' which describe minimum program Housing 
    Quality Standards (HQS) requirements.
        5. Payment standard amount and schedule. Section 982.503 is 
    corrected:
         By adding a new paragraph (b)(1)(iii)) to specify that a 
    PHA may establish a higher payment standard within the basic range 
    (between 90 percent and 110 percent of the published Fair Market Rent 
    (FMR)) when required as a reasonable accommodation for a family that 
    includes a person with disabilities.
         By adding the term ``upper range'' (in redesignated 
    Sec. 982.503(c)(2)(i)) to refer to the interval from 110 percent to 120 
    percent of the published FMR.
         By adding new paragraph (c)(2)(ii) to specify that the HUD 
    field office may approve PHA establishment of a payment standard in the 
    ``upper range'' when required as a reasonable accommodation for a 
    family that includes a person with disabilities.
        6. Payment standard used to calculate subsidy in an exception area. 
    Section 982.505(c)(2) is corrected to clarify that the payment standard 
    used to calculate the subsidy for a dwelling unit located in an 
    exception area is calculated in accordance with Sec. 982.503, which 
    describes the process for establishing the payment standard for an 
    exception area.
        7. Title of Sec. 982.508. The title of Sec. 982.508 is revised to 
    clarify that this section specifies the maximum ``family share'' 
    (defined as gross rent minus the amount of the housing assistance 
    payment) at initial occupancy, rather than the maximum ``rent to 
    owner,'' as suggested by the original title.
        8. Description of amortization cost. Section 982.623(b)(3) is 
    corrected by restoring the description of ``amortization cost,'' which 
    is used to calculate the amount of assistance for a manufactured home 
    space rental under the pre-merger certificate program (for a tenancy 
    commenced before the ``merger date''). This provision was inadvertently 
    deleted by the interim rule.
        9. FMR for manufactured home space. Section 982.623 is corrected by 
    consolidating two paragraphs
    
    [[Page 49658]]
    
    concerning determination of the FMR for a manufactured home space 
    (Sec. 982.623(c)(1)).
        Accordingly, in the interim rule captioned ``Section 8 Tenant-Based 
    Assistance; Statutory Merger of Section 8 Certificate and Voucher 
    Programs,'' FR Document 99-12082, beginning at 64 FR 26632, in the 
    issue of Friday, May 14, 1999, the following corrections are made:
        1. On page 26641, in the first column, the definition of ``Merger 
    date'' in Sec. 982.4 is corrected to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 982.4  Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        Merger date. October 1, 1999.
    * * * * *
        2. On page 26641, in the third column, regulatory amendment 31 is 
    corrected to read as follows:
        31. Amend Sec. 982.54 as follows:
        a. Revise paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(14) and (d)(15);
        b. Remove paragraph (d)(16);
        c. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(17), (d)(18), (d)(19), (d)(20), 
    (d)(21) and (d)(22) as paragraphs (d)(16), (d)(17), (d)(18), (d)(19), 
    (d)(20) and (d)(21) respectively;
        d. Revise newly designated paragraphs (d)(20) and (d)(21); and
        e. Add paragraphs (d)(22) and (d)(23).
        The revisions and additions read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 982.54  Administrative plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) * * *
        (1) Selection and admission of applicants from the PHA waiting 
    list, including any PHA admission preferences, procedures for removing 
    applicant names from the waiting list, and procedures for closing and 
    reopening the PHA waiting list;
        (2) Issuing or denying vouchers, including PHA policy governing the 
    voucher term and any extensions or suspensions of the voucher term. 
    ``Suspension'' means stopping the clock on the term of a family's 
    voucher after the family submits a request for approval of the tenancy. 
    If the PHA decides to allow extensions or suspensions of the voucher 
    term, the PHA administrative plan must describe how the PHA determines 
    whether to grant extensions or suspensions, and how the PHA determines 
    the length of any extension or suspension;
    * * * * *
        (14) The process for establishing and revising voucher payment 
    standards;
        (15) The method of determining that rent to owner is a reasonable 
    rent (initially and during the term of a HAP contract);
    * * * * *
        (20) Restrictions, if any, on the number of moves by a participant 
    family (see Sec. 982.314(c));
        (21) Approval by the Board of Commissioners or other authorized 
    officials to charge the administrative fee reserve;
        (22) Procedural guidelines and performance standards for conducting 
    required HQS inspections; and
        (23) PHA screening of applicants for family behavior or suitability 
    for tenancy.
    
    
    Sec. 982.201  [Corrected]
    
        3. On page 26643, in the second column, Sec. 982.201(b)(4) is 
    corrected by revising the reference to ``(for the family unit size)'' 
    to read ``(for the family size)''.
        4. On page 26645, in the first column, Sec. 982.307(a)(1) is 
    corrected to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 982.307  Tenant screening.
    
        (a) PHA option and owner responsibility. (1) The PHA has no 
    liability or responsibility to the owner or other persons for the 
    family's behavior or suitability for tenancy. However, the PHA may opt 
    to screen applicants for family behavior or suitability for tenancy. 
    The PHA must conduct any such screening of applicants in accordance 
    with policies stated in the PHA administrative plan.
    * * * * *
    
    
    Sec. 982.401  [Corrected]
    
        5. On page 26646, in the third column, Sec. 982.401(a)(4)(iii)(A) 
    is corrected by revising the reference to ``Acceptability criteria'' to 
    read ``Performance requirements''.
        6. On page 26648, in the second and third columns, Sec. 982.503 is 
    corrected by adding paragraph (b)(1)(iii) and revising paragraph (c)(2) 
    to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 982.503  Voucher tenancy: Payment standard amount and schedule.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
        (1) * * *
        (iii) The PHA may establish a higher payment standard within the 
    basic range if required as a reasonable accommodation for a family that 
    includes a person with disabilities.
        (c) * * *
        (2) Above 110 percent of FMR to 120 percent of FMR. (i) The HUD 
    Field Office may approve an exception payment standard amount from 
    above 110 percent of the published FMR to 120 percent of the published 
    FMR (upper range) if such office determines that such approval is 
    justified by either the median rent method or the 40th percentile rent 
    as described below (and that such approval is also supported by an 
    appropriate program justification in accordance with paragraph (c)(4) 
    of this section).
        (A) Median rent method. In the median rent method, HUD determines 
    the exception payment standard amount by multiplying the FMR times a 
    fraction of which the numerator is the median gross rent of the 
    exception area and the denominator is the median gross rent of the 
    entire FMR area. In this method, HUD uses median gross rent data from 
    the most recent decennial United States census, and the exception area 
    may be any geographic entity within the FMR area (or any combination of 
    such entities) for which median gross rent data is provided in 
    decennial census products.
        (B) 40th percentile rent method. In this method, HUD determines 
    that the area exception rent equals the 40th percentile of rents to 
    lease standard quality rental housing in the exception area. HUD 
    determines the 40th percentile rent in accordance with the methodology 
    described in Sec. 888.113 of this title for determining fair market 
    rents. A PHA must present statistically representative rental housing 
    survey data to justify HUD approval.
        (ii) The HUD Field Office may approve an exception payment standard 
    amount within the upper range if required as a reasonable accommodation 
    for a family that includes a person with disabilities.
    * * * * *
        7. On page 26649, in the third column, Sec. 982.505(c)(2) is 
    corrected to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 982.505  Voucher tenancy: How to calculate housing assistance 
    payment.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (2) If the dwelling unit is located in an exception area, the PHA 
    must use the appropriate payment standard amount established by the PHA 
    for the exception area in accordance with Sec. 982.503.
    * * * * *
        8. On page 26649, in the third column, the section heading for 
    Sec. 982.508 is corrected to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 982.508  Maximum family share at initial occupancy.
    
    * * * * *
        9. On page 26650, in the third column, Sec. 982.552 is corrected by 
    adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
    
    [[Page 49659]]
    
    Sec. 982.552  PHA denial or termination of assistance for family.
    
    * * * * *
        (e) Applicant screening. The PHA may at any time deny program 
    assistance for an applicant in accordance with the PHA policy, as 
    stated in the PHA administrative plan, on screening of applicants for 
    family behavior or suitability for tenancy.
        10. On page 26651, in the second and third columns, Sec. 982.623 is 
    corrected as follows:
        a. Remove paragraph (a);
        b. Redesignate paragraphs (b) and (c) as paragraphs (a) and (b), 
    respectively;
        c. Add paragraph (a)(3); and
        c. Revise newly designated paragraph (b)(1).
    
    
    Sec. 982.623  Manufactured home space rental: Housing assistance 
    payment.
    
        (a) * * *
        (3) Amortization cost. (i) The amortization cost may include debt 
    service to amortize cost (other than furniture costs) included in the 
    purchase price of the manufactured home. The debt service includes the 
    payment for principal and interest on the loan. The debt service amount 
    must be reduced by 15 percent to exclude debt service to amortize the 
    cost of furniture, unless the PHA determines that furniture was not 
    included in the purchase price.
        (ii) The amount of the amortization cost is the debt service 
    established at time of application to a lender for financing purchase 
    of the manufactured home if monthly payments are still being made. Any 
    increase in debt service due to refinancing after purchase of the home 
    is not included in amortization cost.
        (iii) Debt service for set-up charges incurred by a family that 
    relocates its home may be included in the monthly amortization payment 
    made by the family. In addition, set-up charges incurred before the 
    family became an assisted family may be included in the amortization 
    cost if monthly payments are still being made to amortize such charges.
        (b) Housing assistance payment for voucher tenancy. (1) There is a 
    separate FMR for a family renting a manufactured home space. The FMR 
    for a manufactured home space is determined in accordance with 
    Sec. 888.113(e) of this title. The FMR for rental of a manufactured 
    home space is generally 30 percent of the published FMR for a two-
    bedroom unit (see FMR notices published by HUD pursuant to part 888).
    * * * * *
        Dated: September 8, 1999.
    Harold Lucas,
    Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
    [FR Doc. 99-23895 Filed 9-13-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4210-33-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
09/14/1999
Department:
Housing and Urban Development Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Correction.
Document Number:
99-23895
Pages:
49656-49659 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FR-4428-C-03
RINs:
2577-AB91: Section 8 Tenant Based Assistance: Statutory Merger (FR-4428)
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2577-AB91/section-8-tenant-based-assistance-statutory-merger-fr-4428-
PDF File:
99-23895.pdf
CFR: (12)
24 CFR 982.503(c)(2)(i))
24 CFR 888.113(e)
24 CFR 982.4
24 CFR 982.54
24 CFR 982.201
More ...