[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 209 (Friday, October 29, 1999)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58340-58344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-27197]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[MD081-3043a; FRL-6449-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Maryland; Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are converting our conditional approval of the State of
Maryland's State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for an enhanced
vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program, which was granted on
July 31, 1997 (61 FR 40938), to a full approval. In the State of
Maryland the I/M program is known as the vehicle emissions inspection
program (VEIP). In our July 31, 1997 conditional approval, we imposed
fifteen conditions for full approval. We have determined that Maryland
has met all of those conditions for full approval. The intent of this
action is to convert our conditional approval of Maryland's VEIP SIP to
a full approval.
DATES: This rule is effective on December 28, 1999 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by November 29,
1999. If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to David L. Arnold, Chief,
Ozone and Mobile Sources Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are
available for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103; the Air and
Radiation Docket and Information Center, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460; and the Maryland
Department of the Environment, 2500 Broening Highway, Baltimore,
Maryland, 21224. Please contact Christopher Cripps at (215) 814-2179 if
you wish to arrange an appointment to view the docket at the
Philadelphia office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Cripps, (215) 814-2179, at
the EPA Region III address above, or by e-mail at
cripps.christopher@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This Supplementary Information section is organized as follows:
I. What action is EPA taking today?
II. Who is affected by this action?
III. Who will benefit from this action?
IV. What Maryland SIP revision is the topic of this action?
V. What were the requirements for full approval of the Maryland
program?
VI. How did Maryland fulfill these requirements for full approval?
VII. What is EPA doing Regarding Vehicles at Federal Facilities?
VIII. EPA Action
IX. Administrative Requirements
I. What Action is EPA Taking Today?
In this action, we are converting our conditional approval of
Maryland's I/M program as a revision to the SIP to a full approval.
II. Who is Affected by This Action?
Residents of the following jurisdictions in Maryland: Anne Arundel
County, Baltimore County, Calvert County, Carroll County, Cecil County,
Charles County, Frederick County, Harford County, Howard County,
Montgomery County, Queen Anne's County, Washington County and Baltimore
City. It is important to note that our action today does not impose any
new requirements on Maryland residents; we are merely granting full
approval (versus the conditional approval previously granted) to the
Maryland laws and regulations already in place at the state level to
implement enhanced I/M in Maryland. These laws and regulations were
made part of the Maryland SIP by the conditional approval that was
published on July 31, 1997.
III. Who Will Benefit From This Action?
The residents of Maryland will benefit from this program, which is
designed to keep vehicles maintained and operating within pollution
control standards. Because air pollution does not recognize political
boundaries, neighboring states' residents will also benefit from
implementation of this program, designed to prevent excessive vehicle
pollution.
IV. What Maryland SIP Revision is the Topic of this Action?
This notice deals with a revision to the State of MD SIP entitled
``Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program (SIP Revision 98-13)''
which was submitted by the Secretary of the Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) September 25, 1998 and supplemented on May 25, 1999.
Today we are acting only upon this September 25, 1998, SIP revision and
supplemental submittals to determine that Maryland satisfied certain
deficiencies of its conditionally approved enhanced I/M plan, and in so
doing we are not reopening our July 31, 1997, final rulemaking granting
conditional approval of Maryland's enhanced I/M SIP submitted on July
10, 1995, as supplemented on March 27, 1996.
V. What Were the Requirements for Full Approval of the Maryland
Program?
Approval of Maryland's I/M program SIP was subject to 15 conditions
which are summarized in Table 1. These were also discussed in detail in
our July 31, 1997 conditional approval.
VI. How Did Maryland Fulfill These Requirements for Full Approval?
On September 25, 1998, Maryland submitted revisions to its enhanced
I/M SIP to EPA in order to correct conditions for full approval, as
detailed in Table 1.
[[Page 58341]]
Table 1.--Satisfaction of the Conditions for Full Approval
[Major Conditions `` As Summarized from the July 31, 1997 Rule]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
How Maryland Satisfied the
Requirement for Full Approval Requirement
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Submit fully adopted regulations Maryland submitted copies of
for the enhanced I/M program. fully adopted enhanced I/M
regulations, COMAR 26.11.14
``Vehicle Emissions Inspection
Program'', adopted on November
21, 1997, and on September 16,
1998.
(2) Provide an opinion from the Maryland submitted a
Attorney General's Office or Certification by the Maryland
legislation that demonstrates that the Attorney General's Office that
legislative authority for the program Maryland's Transportation
expires no earlier than November 15, Article authorizes the
2005. Maryland I/M program for as
long as is required by federal
law.
(3) Submit a modeling demonstration of Maryland submitted an
the program using appropriate acceptable modeling
assumptions for the years 2002 and demonstration of their
2005. program.
(4) Demonstrate that adequate funding Maryland submitted staffing and
and tools exist for the years 1997 and budget data for the years 1997
1998 for running the program. This and 1998.
included information on the numbers of
personnel dedicated to the I/M program
areas and budget allocations for
equipment resources.
(5) Provide an explanation of how all Maryland provided information
vehicles in the I/M program will be on how vehicles in the I/M
identified Maryland provided program are identified.
information on how vehicles in the I/M Maryland law requires
program are identified. residents residing in the
program area to register these
vehicles properly. This is
enforced by checking
registration information
whenever a vehicle is stopped
by police for any reason and
by surveys of parked vehicles
to identify vehicles with out-
of-state tags that are
operated routinely in or by de
facto residents of the program
area.
(6) Provide information on applicable Maryland submitted a copy the
Maryland law and regulations on how Maryland law that prohibits
``engine switching is handled'' and any modification to the
how vehicles without a certified vehicle's original emission
configuration will be testing. control system Maryland
submitted a procedures
document which specifies that
Maryland's engine switch
guidelines require that a
switched engine must meet or
exceed the requirements for
the vehicles model year and
class and that owners of
vehicles with a non-certified
engine configuration or
replacement engine may request
a one-time extension, which
may not exceed one-year, to
the emission testing
requirements in order to bring
the vehicle into compliance.
(7) Submit written specifications for Maryland submitted written
gas cap testing. specifications for gas cap
testing.
(8) Submit a description of Maryland's Maryland submitted the
practice of issuing short-term time procedures and documentation
extensions due to economic hardship that adequately address the
and the time limit(s) for such issuance of short-term time
exemptions. extensions due to economic
hardship and the time limit
for such exemptions.
(9) Submit documentation regarding: (a) Maryland submitted the
aspects of the I/M program as applied procedures for handling
to exemptions for residents out-of- exemptions for residents out-
state, to residents newly located in of-state, the procedures and
the I/M program area, and to require documentation that adequately
confirmation of exempt status, and (b) address residents newly
citation of owners for noncompliance located in The I/M program
with Maryland's registration areas and that require
requirements and practices regarding verification of exempt status.
impounding of vehicles. Maryland submitted the
procedures and documentation
that adequately address
citation of owners for
noncompliance with Maryland's
registration requirements and
practices regarding impounding
of vehicles.
(10) Demonstrate that Maryland's Maryland submitted acceptable
enforcement program oversight is quality assurance oversight
quality controlled and quality assured. procedures and documentation.
(11) Provide a description of Maryland submitted a
Maryland's auditing program. description of Maryland's
auditing program.
(12) Submit documentation regarding the Maryland submitted the current
penalty schedule applicable to the I/M penalty schedule for the I/M
program contractor. program contractor.
(13) Submit evidence that inspectors Maryland submitted a procedures
must be re-certified at least every document that requires such
two years or less. recertification every 24
months.
(14) Submit documentation on how it Maryland submitted a procedures
investigates and responds to motorist document that outlines the
complaints, and submit documentation procedures used to investigate
relating to protection of whistle and respond to complaints
blowers. Maryland submitted a copy of
Maryland Code Title 5,
subtitle 3 which provides for
whistle blower protection.
(15) Start mandatory testing of all On October 1, 1997 Maryland
subject vehicles as soon as possible, commenced implementation of
or by November 15, 1997 at the latest. its VEIP and required affected
vehicles to pass I/M testing
as a condition of eligibility
for registration.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VII. What is EPA Doing Regarding Vehicles at Federal Facilities?
EPA is not requiring Maryland to implement section 40 CFR
51.356(a)(4) of the I/M rule which deals with federal installations
within I/M areas at this time. The Department of Justice has
recommended to EPA that this regulation be revised since it appears to
grant states authority to regulate federal installations in
circumstances where the federal government has not waived sovereign
immunity. Federally owned vehicles operated in Maryland are required to
meet the same requirements as Maryland registered vehicles, but it
would not be appropriate to require compliance with this regulation if
it is not constitutionally authorized. EPA will be revising this
provision in the future and will review state I/M SIPs with respect to
this issue when this new rule is final. EPA is not approving or
disapproving requirements which apply to federal facilities at this
time.
VIII. EPA Action
EPA is converting its conditional approval of Maryland's enhanced
I/M program to a full approval the exception of the provisions
regarding federal facilities. EPA is not approving or disapproving
requirements which apply to federal facilities at this time. An
extensive discussion of Maryland's enhanced I/M program and our
rationale for our approval action was provided in the previous final
rule that
[[Page 58342]]
conditionally approved the enhanced
I/M program (see 62 FR 40938 and 61 FR 56194). This action to convert
our conditional approval to a full approval is being published without
prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and
because we anticipate no adverse comments. In a separate document in
the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register publication, we
are proposing to convert our conditional approval of Maryland's
enhanced I/M program SIP revision to a full approval if adverse
comments are filed. This action will be effective without further
notice unless we receive relevant adverse comment by November 29, 1999.
If we receive such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take
effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. Any parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. If no such comments are received by November 29,
1999, you are advised that this action will be effective on December
28, 1999.
IX. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from review under E.O. 12866, entitled ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.''
B. Executive Orders on Federalism
Under E.O. 12875, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute and that creates a mandate upon a state, local, or
tribal government, unless the Federal government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance costs incurred by those
governments. If EPA complies by consulting, E.O. requires EPA to
provide to the Office of Management and Budget a description of the
extent of EPA's prior consultation with representatives of affected
state, local, and tribal governments, the nature of their concerns,
copies of written communications from the governments, and a statement
supporting the need to issue the regulation. In addition, E.O. 12875
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected
officials and other representatives of state, local, and tribal
governments ``to provide meaningful and timely input in the development
of regulatory proposals containing significant unfunded mandates.''
Today's rule does not create a mandate on state, local or tribal
governments. The rule does not impose any enforceable duties on these
entities. Accordingly, the requirements of section 1(a) of E.O. 12875
do not apply to this rule. On August 4, 1999, President Clinton issued
a new executive order on federalism, Executive Order 13132, (64 FR
43255 (August 10, 1999),) which will take effect on November 2, 1999.
In the interim, the current Executive Order 12612 (52 FR 41685 (October
30, 1987)) on federalism still applies. This rule will not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 12612. The rule affects only one State, and does not
alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
C. Executive Order 13045
E.O. 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies
to any rule that the EPA determines (1) is ``economically
significant,'' as defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) the environmental
health or safety risk addressed by the rule has a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the
planned rule on children and explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible
alternatives considered by the Agency. This final rule is not subject
to E.O. 13045 because it is not an economically significant regulatory
action as defined by E.O. 12866, and it does not address an
environmental health or safety risk that would have a disproportionate
effect on children.
D. Executive Order 13084
Under E.O. 13084, EPA may not issue a regulation that is not
required by statute, that significantly affects or uniquely affects the
communities of Indian tribal governments, and that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on those communities, unless the Federal
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by the tribal governments. If EPA complies by
consulting, Executive Order 13084 requires EPA to provide to the Office
of Management and Budget, in a separately identified section of the
preamble to the rule, a description of the extent of EPA's prior
consultation with representatives of affected tribal governments, a
summary of the nature of their concerns, and a statement supporting the
need to issue the regulation. In addition, Executive Order 13084
requires EPA to develop an effective process permitting elected and
other representatives of Indian tribal governments ``to provide
meaningful and timely input in the development of regulatory policies
on matters that significantly or uniquely affect their communities.''
Today's rule does not significantly or uniquely affect the communities
of Indian tribal governments. This action does not involve or impose
any requirements that affect Indian Tribes. Accordingly, the
requirements of section 3(b) of E.O. 13084 do not apply to this rule.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions. This final rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities because SIP approvals under
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create
any new requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is
already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not
create any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under the
Clean Air Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
F. Unfunded Mandates
Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
annual costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate;
or to private sector, of $100 million or more. Under Section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that
[[Page 58343]]
achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with statutory
requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan for
informing and advising any small governments that may be significantly
or uniquely impacted by the rule. EPA has determined that the approval
action promulgated does not include a Federal mandate that may result
in estimated annual costs of $100 million or more to either State,
local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the private
sector. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under
State or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no
additional costs to State, local, or tribal governments, or to the
private sector, result from this action.
G. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
H. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action to convert our conditional approval of
Maryland's enhanced I/M program to a full approval must be filed in the
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December
28, 1999. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action converting our
conditional approval of the Maryland enhanced I/M SIP to a full
approval may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone.
Dated: September 28, 1999.
W. Michael McCabe,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
Chapter I, title 40, of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
2. Section 52.1070 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(144) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(144) Revisions to the Maryland State Implementation Plan submitted
by the Maryland Department of the Environment on July 10, 1995, March
27, 1996, and September 25, 1998 as supplemented on May 25, 1999:
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Letter of July 10, 1995, from the Maryland Department of the
Environment transmitting an Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection
Program.
(B) Regulations for the Vehicle Emissions Inspection Program COMAR
11.14.08. adopted by the Secretary of the Environment on August 1,
1994, effective January 2, 1995:
(1) COMAR 11.14.08.01 through COMAR 11.14.08.02, inclusive.
(2) COMAR 11.14.08.03A.
(3) COMAR 11.14.08.03A(1).
(4) COMAR 11.14.08.03A(2) except the word ``federal,'' in the first
line.
(5) COMAR 11.14.08.03B.
(6) COMAR 11.14.08.04.
(7) COMAR 11.14.08.05, section A.
(8) COMAR 11.14.08.05 sections B(1) through (7), inclusive.
(9) COMAR 11.14.08.05 sections C. through F., inclusive.
(10) COMAR 11.14.08.06 through COMAR 11.14.08.42, inclusive.
(C) Letter of March 27, 1996, from the Maryland Department of the
Environment transmitting amendments to the Enhanced Vehicle Emissions
Inspection Program.
(D) Letter of September 25, 1998, from the Maryland Department of
the Environment transmitting amendments to the Enhanced Vehicle
Emissions Inspection Program.
(E) The following revisions to the provisions of COMAR 11.14.08
adopted by the Secretary of the Environment on November 21, 1996,
effective December 16, 1996:
(1) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.03B.
(2) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.03C.
(3) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.05B(4).
(4) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.06D(7).
(5) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.09A to .09B, .09B to .09C, .09C to
.09D and .09D to. 09E, .09E to .09F, and .09F to .09G.
(6) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09A, A(1) and A(3).
(7) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(1), B(1)(a), B(1)(b), B(2),
B(3), B(3)(a), B(3)(b) and B(4).
(8) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09E.
(9) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09-1 except the phrase
``and, to the extent allowed by federal law, a vehicle owned by the
federal government'' in section COMAR 11.14.08.09-1A.
(10) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.06B(3) to B(4), B(4) to B(5), B(5)
to B(6), and B(6) to B(7).
(11) Creation of a new COMAR 11.14.08.06B(3) from the last two
sentences of COMAR 11.14.08.06B(2).
(12) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10B(3).
(13) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10C.
(14) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.10C(1), C(1)(a) through C(1)(c),
inclusive, and C(2).
(15) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.10C(2)(a) to C(1), C(2)(b) to C(2),
C(2)(c) to C(3), C(2)(d) to C(4), C(2)(e) to C(5), and C(2)(f) to C(6).
(16) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.11-1 except the phrase
``and, to the extent allowed by federal law, a vehicle owned by the
federal government'' in section COMAR 11.14.08.11-1A.
(17) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.12A.
(18) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.12A(1) through .12A(6), inclusive.
(19) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.12B(1).
(20) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.29A(2).
(21) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.30D(2).
(22) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32A.
(23) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32B(5).
(24) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.42.
(F) The following revisions to the provisions of COMAR 11.14.08
adopted by the Secretary of the Environment on September 16, 1998,
effective October 19, 1998:
[[Page 58344]]
(1) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.02B(40), B(40(a), and B(40)(b).
(2) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.03C.
(3) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.03C and .03D.
(4) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.06A(2).
(5) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.06A(3)(k), (p), (q) and (r).
(6) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.06A(3)(s) and (t) to COMAR
11.14.08.06A(3)(t) and (u), respectively.
(7) The addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.06A(3)(s).
(8) Amendment of COMAR 11.14.08.06D(7).
(9) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.07C.
(10) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09A.
(11) Deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.09A(1) through .09A(3), inclusive.
(12) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09A(1).
(13) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.09A(2), A(2)(a) and A(2)(b).
(14) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B, B(1), B(1)(a) and
B(1)(a)(i).
(15) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(1)(b).
(16) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(2) and B(2)(a).
(17) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(3).
(18) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09B(3)(a) and (b).
(19) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09A(4).
(20) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09A(4)(a).
(21) Renumbering of COMAR 11.14.08.09E to .09F, .09F to .09G, and
.09G to .09H.
(22) Reservation with notes of COMAR 11.14.08.09C and .09D,
(23) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.09E.
(24) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.09F and .09G.
(25) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10B(1)(c) and B(1)(d).
(26) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.10C(6)(b).
(27) Renumbering of COMAR 11.14.08.11 to COMAR 11.14.08.11-1.
(28) Addition of a new COMAR 11.14.08.11.
(29) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.11-1, .11-1A(3), .11-1A(4), 11-
1B, 11-1B(4) and 11-1B(5).
(30) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.11-1C.
(31) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.11-1D(1) and 11-1D(2).
(32) Amendment to COMAR 11.14.08.12.
(33) Renumbering of COMAR 11.14.08.12B to .12C.
(34) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.12A.
(35) Addition a new COMAR 11.14.08.12B and .12B(1).
(36) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.12B(2).
(37) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.12C(1) and C(3).
(38) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.15C(7)(c).
(39) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.16.
(40) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.16C to COMAR 11.14.08.16D.
(41) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.16A and .16B.
(42) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.16C.
(43) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.16D.
(44) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.22C to COMAR 11.14.08.22D.
(45) Reservation with a note of COMAR 11.14.08.22A and .22B.
(46) Addition with a note of a new reserved COMAR 11.14.08.22C.
(47) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.27C(2).
(48) The deletion of COMAR 11.14.08.27C(3).
(49) Renumbering COMAR 11.14.08.27C(4) to COMAR 11.14.08.27C(3).
(50) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.28A.
(51) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32A.
(52) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.32B(5).
(53) Amendments to COMAR 11.14.08.42.
(G) Letter of May 25, 1999, from the Maryland Department of the
Environment transmitting amendments to the Enhanced Vehicle Emissions
Inspection Program.
(ii) Additional material.
(A) Remainder of the July 10, 1995, submittal;
(B) Remainder of March 27, 1996, submittal;
(C) Remainder of September 25, 1998, submittal; and
(D) Remainder of May 25, 1999, submittal.
Sec. 52.1072 [Amended]
3. In Sec. 52.1072, paragraph (a) is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. 99-27197 Filed 10-28-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
