2014-11508. Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho: Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards
-
Start Preamble
Start Printed Page 29358
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The EPA is approving the February 14, 2012, State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal from Idaho demonstrating that the SIP meets the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for lead (Pb) on October 15, 2008. The CAA requires that each state, after a new or revised NAAQS is promulgated, review their SIP to ensure that it meets the infrastructure requirements necessary to implement the new or revised NAAQS. The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP meets the CAA infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS.
DATES:
This final rule is effective on June 23, 2014.
ADDRESSES:
The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket Identification No. EPA-R10-OAR-2012-0183. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste, and Toxics, AWT-107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall at: (206) 553-6357, hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever “we,” “us” or “our” is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA. Information is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Section 110 of the CAA specifies the general requirements for states to submit SIPs to attain and maintain the NAAQS and the EPA's actions regarding approval of those SIPs. On February 14, 2012, Idaho submitted a SIP revision to the EPA demonstrating that the SIP meets the infrastructure requirements of the CAA for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. On March 26, 2014, we proposed approval of Idaho's February 14, 2012, submittal (79 FR 16722). An explanation of the CAA requirements and implementing regulations that are met by this SIP revision, a detailed explanation of the revision, and the EPA's reasons for the proposed action were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking on March 26, 2014, and will not be restated here (79 FR 16722). The public comment period for our proposed action ended on April 25, 2014, and we received no comments.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the February 14, 2012, submittal from Idaho demonstrating that the SIP meets the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Specifically, we find that the Idaho SIP meets the following CAA section 110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). This action is being taken under section 110 of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
- Is not a “significant regulatory action” subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
- does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
- is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
- does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
- does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
- is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
- is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
- is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the State, and the EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a Start Printed Page 29359“major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 21, 2014. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
Start List of SubjectsList of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
- Environmental protection
- Air pollution control
- Incorporation by reference
- Lead
- Particulate matter, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Michelle Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
Start PartPART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
End Part Start Amendment Part1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
End Amendment PartSubpart N—Idaho
Start Amendment Part2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an entry at the end of the table for “Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS.”
End Amendment PartThe addition reads as follows:
Identification of plan.* * * * *(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
Name of SIP provision Applicable geographic or nonattainment area State submittal date EPA approval date Comments * * * * * * * Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS State-wide 2/14/2012 5/22/2014 [Insert page number where the document begins] This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). [FR Doc. 2014-11508 Filed 5-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Information
- Effective Date:
- 6/23/2014
- Published:
- 05/22/2014
- Department:
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Entry Type:
- Rule
- Action:
- Final rule.
- Document Number:
- 2014-11508
- Dates:
- This final rule is effective on June 23, 2014.
- Pages:
- 29358-29359 (2 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- EPA-R10-OAR-2012-0183, FRL-9911-09-Region-10
- Topics:
- Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Lead, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- PDF File:
- 2014-11508.pdf
- Supporting Documents:
- » 301 Supporting Materials ID 2013 Network Approval letter 3-10-14
- » 203 EPA Guidance 11 07 2011 Memo on Ambient Pb Contribution
- » 202 EPA Guidance 10 14 2011 Pb Sec 110 Infrastructure guidance
- » 201 EPA Guidance 8 11 1999 Memo on SSM
- » 101 State Submittal Idaho 2 23 2012 Submittal 2008 Pb Infrastructure
- CFR: (1)
- 40 CFR 52.670