2018-06538. Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District
-
Start Preamble
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve a revision to the Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District (NSAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns emissions of particulate matter (PM) from wood burning devices. We are approving a local measure to reduce emissions from these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES:
This rule will be effective on May 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES:
The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0737. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through http://www.regulations.gov,, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information.
Start Further InfoFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rynda Kay, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4118, kay.rynda@epa.gov.
End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental InformationSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, “we,” “us” and “our” refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On December 27, 2017 (82 FR 61203), the EPA proposed to approve the following measure into the California SIP.
Local agency Resolution No. Measure title Adopted Submitted NSAQMD 2017-01 Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District Resolution #2017-01 01/23/17 02/28/17 We proposed to approve this rule based on a determination that it satisfies the applicable CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the measure and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received three public comments that fail to identify any specific issue that is germane to our action on the rule. Two of these comments identify issues that are outside of the scope of this rulemaking, including forest management, wildfire suppression, and greenhouse-gas and other emissions from wildfires. The third comment fails to identify any specific issue. The comment letters are available in the docket for this rulemaking.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule as described in our proposed action. Therefore, the EPA is fully approving this rule into the California SIP in accordance with section 110(k)(3) of the Act.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the NSAQMD measure described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
- Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
- Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866;
- Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
- Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
- Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
- Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
- Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
- Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);Start Printed Page 13872
- Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
- Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 1, 2018. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
Start List of SubjectsList of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
- Environmental protection
- Air pollution control
- Incorporation by reference
- Intergovernmental relations
- Ozone
- Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
- Volatile organic compounds
Dated: March 9, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
Start PartPART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
End Part Start Amendment Part1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
End Amendment PartSubpart F—California
Start Amendment Part2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(500) to read as follows:
End Amendment PartIdentification of plan-in part.* * * * *(c) * * *
(500) The following plan was submitted on February 28, 2017 by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District.
(1) Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District Resolution #2017-01, adopted January 23, 2017.
[FR Doc. 2018-06538 Filed 3-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Document Information
- Effective Date:
- 5/2/2018
- Published:
- 04/02/2018
- Department:
- Environmental Protection Agency
- Entry Type:
- Rule
- Action:
- Final rule.
- Document Number:
- 2018-06538
- Dates:
- This rule will be effective on May 2, 2018.
- Pages:
- 13871-13872 (2 pages)
- Docket Numbers:
- EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0737, FRL-9976-08-Region 9
- Topics:
- Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds
- PDF File:
- 2018-06538.pdf
- Supporting Documents:
- » III-I Email from Katarzyna Turkiewicz CARB to Rynda Kay EPA dated Nov 29 2017
- » III-H EPA TSD Portola Ordinance
- » III-G Final Signed Portola Ordinance 3.44
- » III-F 2016 Progress Report
- » III-E RIA for Residential Wood Heaters
- » III-D Houck email3
- » III-C emissioncalculator_2
- » III-B Letter from Meredith Kurpius, EPA Region IX to Gretchen Bennitt, NSAQMD dated December 11, 2013
- » III-A EPA TSD NSAQMD District Resolution 2017-01 dated Dec 2017
- » II-G 2014 Diesel Retrofits Guidance
- CFR: (1)
- 40 CFR 52.220