94-344. Airworthiness Directives; Canadair Model CL-600-2B19 ``Regional Jet'' Series 100 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-344]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 11, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 93-NM-230-AD; Amendment 39-8791; AD 94-01-09]
    
     
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Canadair Model CL-600-2B19 ``Regional 
    Jet'' Series 100 Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    is applicable to Canadair Model CL-600-2B19 ``Regional Jet'' Series 100 
    airplanes. This action requires a revision to the Airplane Flight 
    Manual (AFM) to limit altitude and airspeed operations of the airplane 
    under certain conditions of hydraulic system failure. This amendment is 
    prompted by a report of sheared-off shear pins found on one airplane's 
    elevator dampers. The actions specified in this AD are intended to 
    prevent undampened vibration of the elevators in normal cruise 
    conditions when combined with hydraulic system failures, a condition 
    which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective January 26, 1994.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before March 14, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-103, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 93-NM-230-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Franco Pieri, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe Branch, ANE-172, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 
    Engine and Propeller Directorate, 181 South Franklin Avenue, room 202, 
    Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 791-6221; fax (516) 791-
    9024.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Transport Canada Aviation, which is the 
    airworthiness authority for Canada, recently notified the FAA that an 
    unsafe condition may exist on certain Canadair Model CL-600-2B19 
    ``Regional Jet'' Series 100 airplanes. Transport Canada Aviation 
    advises that one operator of these airplanes found that the shear pins 
    on the airplane elevator dampers had sheared off. This finding was made 
    during a routine check of the airplane. The cause of the pin failure 
    has not been determined. Failure of the shear pins on the elevator 
    damper, if not detected and corrected, may lead to undampened vibration 
    of the elevators during normal cruise conditions when combined with 
    hydraulic system failures. This situation could result in reduced 
    controllability of the airplane.
        This airplane model is manufactured in Canada and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations and the applicable 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral 
    airworthiness agreement, Transport Canada Aviation has kept the FAA 
    informed of the situation described above.
        In order to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes 
    in Canada, Transport Canada Aviation issued a Canadian airworthiness 
    directive on December 17, 1993, that restricts operation of these 
    airplanes to certain altitude and airspeed limits under various 
    conditions of hydraulic system failure. The FAA has examined the 
    findings of Transport Canada Aviation, reviewed all available 
    information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of 
    this type design that are certificated for operation in the United 
    States.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, this AD is being issued to prevent undampened 
    vibration of the elevators during normal cruise conditions in the event 
    of hydraulic system failures, which could result in reduced 
    controllability of the airplane. This AD requires a revision to the 
    Limitations Section of the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to 
    restrict altitude and airspeed operations under conditions of single or 
    double hydraulic failure.
        This is considered interim action until final action is identified, 
    at which time the FAA may consider additional rulemaking.
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
    public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 93-NM-230-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and is not a ``significant regulatory action'' 
    under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this 
    action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies 
    and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined 
    that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will 
    be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may 
    be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the 
    caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 
    39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 
    106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
        94-01-09  Canadair: Amendment 39-8791. Docket 93-NM-230-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model CL-600-2B19 ``Regional Jet'' Series 100 
    airplanes; serial numbers 7003 and subsequent; certificated in any 
    category.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent undampened vibration of the elevators during normal 
    cruise conditions in the event of hydraulic system failures, which 
    could result in reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish 
    the following:
        (a) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, revise 
    the Limitations Section of the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual 
    (AFM) to include the following restrictions of altitude and airspeed 
    operations under conditions of single or double hydraulic system 
    failure; and advise the flight crew of these revised limits. 
    Revision of the AFM may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this 
    AD in the AFM.
    
        Note 1: The restrictions described in the AFM Temporary Revision 
    (TR) RJ/30 meet the requirements of this paragraph. Therefore, 
    inserting a copy of TR RJ/30 in lieu of this AD in the AFM is 
    considered an acceptable means of compliance with this paragraph.
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Altitude limit                                                       
          (maximum)                    Airspeed limit (maximum)             
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Single Hydraulic                                                        
     System Failure:                                                        
      31,000 feet.......  0.55 Mach (199 KIAS).                             
      30,000 feet.......  0.55 Mach (204 KIAS).                             
      28,000 feet.......  0.55 Mach (213 KIAS).                             
      26,000 feet.......  0.55 Mach (222 KIAS).                             
      24,000 feet.......  0.55 Mach (232 KIAS).                             
      22,000 feet.......  0.55 Mach (241 KIAS).                             
      20,000 feet and     252 KIAS.                                         
       below.                                                               
    Double Hydraulic                                                        
     System Failure:                                                        
      10,000 feet.......  200 KIAS.                                         
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, New York ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the New York ACO.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 
    21.197 and 21.199 to operate the airplane to a location where the 
    requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) This amendment becomes effective on January 26, 1994.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 3, 1994.
    Darrell M. Pederson,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 94-344 Filed 1-10-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/26/1994
Published:
01/11/1994
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
94-344
Dates:
Effective January 26, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 11, 1994, Docket No. 93-NM-230-AD, Amendment 39-8791, AD 94-01-09
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 21.29
14 CFR 39.13