99-505. List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Addition  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 6 (Monday, January 11, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 1542-1545]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-505]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    10 CFR Part 72
    
    RIN 3150-AG 17
    
    
    List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks: Addition
    
    AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to amend 
    its regulations to add the Holtec International Hi-Star 100 cask system 
    (Hi-Star) to the List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks. This 
    amendment will allow the holders of power reactor operating licenses to 
    store spent fuel in the Hi-Star cask system under a general license.
    
    DATES: The comment period expires March 29, 1999. Comments received 
    after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the 
    NRC is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or 
    before this date.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Rulemakings and 
    Adjudications Staff. Hand deliver comments to 11555 Rockville Pike, 
    Rockville, MD, between 7:45 am and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.
        You may also provide comments via the NRC's interactive rulemaking 
    Web site through the NRC's home page (http://www.nrc.gov). This site 
    provides the availability to upload comments as files (any format) if 
    your web browser supports that function. For information about the 
    interactive rulemaking site, contact Ms. Carol Gallagher, (301) 415-
    5905; e-mail [email protected]
        Certain documents related to this rulemaking, including comments 
    received by the NRC, may be examined at the NRC Public Document Room, 
    2120 L Street NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC. These documents also 
    may be viewed and downloaded electronically via the interactive 
    rulemaking website established by NRC for this rulemaking.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stan Turel, telephone (301) 415-6234, 
    e-mail, spt@nrc.gov or Philip Brochman, telephone (301) 415-8592, e-
    mail,
    
    [[Page 1543]]
    
    pgb@nrc.gov of the Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards, 
    U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Section 218(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, 
    (NWPA) directs that, ``(t)he Secretary (of the Department of Energy 
    (DOE)) shall establish a demonstration program, in cooperation with the 
    private sector, for the dry storage of spent nuclear fuel at civilian 
    nuclear power reactor sites, with the objective of establishing one or 
    more technologies that the (Nuclear Regulatory) Commission may, by 
    rule, approve for use at the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors 
    without, to the maximum extent practicable, the need for additional 
    site-specific approvals by the Commission.'' Section 133 of the NWPA 
    states, in part, that ``[t]he Commission shall, by rule, establish 
    procedures for the licensing of any technology approved by the 
    Commission under section 218(a) for use at the site of any civilian 
    nuclear power reactor.''
        To implement this mandate, the NRC approved dry storage of spent 
    nuclear fuel in NRC-approved casks under a general license, publishing 
    a final rule on July 18, 1990 in 10 CFR part 72 entitled ``General 
    License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites'' (55 FR 
    29181, 1990). This rule also established a new Subpart L within 10 CFR 
    part 72 entitled ``Approval of Spent Fuel Storage Casks,'' containing 
    procedures and criteria for obtaining NRC approval of dry storage casks 
    designs. Dry storage cask systems are massive devices designed to 
    provide shielding from direct exposure to radiation, to confine the 
    spent fuel in a safe storage condition, and to prevent releases of 
    radioactive material to the environment. They are designed to perform 
    these tasks by relying on passive heat removal and confinement systems 
    without moving parts and with minimal reliance on human intervention to 
    safely fulfill their function for the term of storage. The 1990 
    rulemaking listed four casks in 10 CFR 72.214 subpart K as approved by 
    the NRC for storage of spent fuel at power reactor sites under general 
    license by persons authorized to possess or operate nuclear power 
    reactors.
    
    Discussion
    
        This proposed rulemaking would add the Holtec International HI-STAR 
    100 cask system to the list of NRC approved casks for spent fuel 
    storage in 10 CFR 72.214. Following the procedures specified in 10 CFR 
    72.230 of subpart L, Holtec International submitted an application for 
    NRC approval, together with its Safety Analysis Report (SAR): ``HI-STAR 
    100 Cask System Topical Safety Analysis Report (TSAR), Revision 8'' 
    dated June 18, 1998. The NRC evaluated the Holtec International 
    submittal and issued a preliminary Safety Evaluation Report (SER) on 
    the Holtec International SAR and a proposed certificate of compliance 
    (CoC) for the Holtec International HI-STAR 100 cask system.
        The NRC is proposing to approve the Holtec International HI-STAR 
    100 cask system for storage of spent fuel under the conditions 
    specified in the proposed CoC. While the HI-STAR 100 cask system is 
    designed to be used as a dual purpose storage and transportation cask, 
    the use or certification of the HI-STAR 100 under 10 CFR part 71 for 
    off-site transport of spent fuel is not a subject of this rulemaking. 
    Certification for transportation could occur only after the completion 
    of a separate staff review of the HI-STAR 100 Safety Analysis report 
    for transportation. Thus, issues pertaining to the transportation 
    configuration of the HI-STAR 100 cask system are not within the scope 
    of this rulemaking.
        The HI-STAR 100 cask system, when used in accordance with the 
    conditions specified in the CoC and NRC regulations, will meet the 
    requirements of 10 CFR part 72; thus, adequate protection of public 
    health and safety would be ensured. This cask is being proposed for 
    listing under 10 CFR 72.214, ``List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage 
    Casks'' to allow holders of power reactor operating licensees to store 
    spent fuel in this cask under a general license. The CoC would 
    terminate 20 years after the effective date of the final rule listing 
    this cask in 10 CFR 72.214, unless the cask's CoC is renewed. The 
    certificate contains conditions for use similar to those for other NRC 
    approved casks, however, the CoC for each cask system may differ in 
    some specifics--such as, certificate number, operating procedures, 
    training exercises, spent fuel specification. The proposed CoC for the 
    Holtec International HI-STAR 100 cask system and the underlying 
    preliminary SER, dated December 15, 1998, are available for inspection 
    and comment at the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW. (Lower 
    Level), Washington, DC. Single copies of the proposed CoC may be 
    obtained from Stan Turel, Office of Nuclear Materials Safety and 
    Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, 
    telephone (301) 415-6234, email spt@nrc.gov.
    
    Future Rulemaking Procedures
    
        The Holtec International HI-STAR 100 cask system would become the 
    eighth cask system added to 10 CFR 72.214 list through the process of 
    notice-and-comment rulemaking. Because the NRC believes the additions 
    and revisions to the list of approved spent fuel storage casks are 
    noncontroversial and routine, NRC is considering publishing future 
    additions and revisions as direct final rules. Direct final rulemaking 
    is a technique for expediting the issuance of noncontroversial rules. 
    If the NRC implements this procedure in future rulemakings adding cask 
    systems to the 10 CFR 72.214 list, the NRC would publish the proposed 
    addition or revision to the list as both a proposed and a final rule in 
    the Federal Register simultaneously. A direct final rule will normally 
    become effective 75 days after publication in the Federal Register. 
    However, if the NRC receives significant adverse comments on the direct 
    final rule within 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, 
    the NRC will publish a document that withdraws the direct final rule. 
    If the direct final rule is withdrawn, the NRC will address the 
    comments received as comments on the proposed rule and will 
    subsequently issue a final rule. Absent significant modifications to 
    the proposed revisions requiring republication, the NRC will not 
    initiate a second comment period in the event the direct final rule is 
    withdrawn. The NRC is requesting comments on the use of direct final 
    rules for future additions and revisions to the list of approved spent 
    fuel storage casks.
    
    Errata to the Proposed Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Preliminary 
    SER
    
        During NRC management review of the proposed CoC (docketed 
    September 30, 1998, and placed in the NRC PDR) a question was 
    identified on the 6,000 psi limit in Technical Specification 4.4.6.d, 
    ``Soil effective modulus of elasticity.'' The question related to 
    whether the 6,000 psi limit was too narrow and whether this limit would 
    unnecessarily restrict which reactor sites could use the HI-STAR 100 
    cask. NRC staff evaluated this issue and requested the applicant 
    provide additional information. The applicant subsequently submitted 
    additional information and supporting analysis and requested that the 
    soil effective modulus of elasticity limit be raised to 28,000 psi. NRC 
    staff verified that if a 28,000 psi limit was used, the maximum cask 
    deceleration occurring in the cask
    
    [[Page 1544]]
    
    tip-over, side drop, and bottom-end vertical-drop accident analyses 
    would remain bounded by the existing SER analyses.
    
    Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact: Availability
    
        Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, 
    and the NRC regulations in subpart A of 10 CFR part 51, the NRC has 
    determined that this rule, if adopted, would not be a major Federal 
    action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment 
    and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The 
    rule is mainly administrative in nature. It would not change safety 
    requirements and would not have significant environmental impacts. The 
    proposed rule would add a cask known as the Holtec International HI-
    STAR 100 cask system to the list of approved spent fuel storage casks 
    that power reactor licensees can use to store spent fuel at reactor 
    sites without additional site-specific approvals by the NRC. The 
    environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact on which 
    this determination is based are available for inspection at the NRC 
    Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW. (Lower Level), Washington, DC. 
    Single copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no 
    significant impact are available from Stan Turel Office of Nuclear 
    Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
    Washington, DC 20555, Telephone (301) 415-6234, email spt@nrc.gov.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
    
        This proposed rule does not contain a new or amended information 
    collection requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
    (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the 
    Office of Management and Budget, Approval Number 3150-0132.
    
    Public Protection Notification
    
        If an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB 
    control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
    required to respond to, the information collection.
    
    Regulatory Analysis
    
        On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC issued an amendment to 10 
    CFR part 72. The amendment provided for the storage of spent nuclear 
    fuel under a general license in casks certified by the NRC. Any nuclear 
    power reactor licensee can use NRC-certified casks to store spent 
    nuclear fuel if they notify the NRC in advance, spent fuel is stored 
    under the conditions specified in the cask's CoC, and the conditions of 
    the general license are met. In that rule, four spent fuel storage 
    casks were approved for use at reactor sites and were listed in 10 CFR 
    72.214. That rule envisioned that storage casks certified in the future 
    could be added to the listing in 10 CFR 72.214 through rulemaking 
    procedures. Procedures and criteria for obtaining NRC approval of new 
    spent fuel storage cask designs were provided in 10 CFR part 72, 
    subpart L. Subsequently, two additional casks were added to the listing 
    in 10 CFR 72.214 in 1993 and one in 1994.
        The alternative to this proposed action is to withhold 
    certification of this new design and issue a site-specific license to 
    each utility that proposed to use the casks. However, this alternative 
    would cost the NRC more time and money for each site-specific review. 
    In addition, withholding certification would ignore the procedures and 
    criteria currently in place for the addition of new cask designs. 
    Further, it is in conflict with the Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA) 
    direction to the NRC to approve technologies for the use of spent fuel 
    storage at the sites of civilian nuclear power reactors without, to the 
    extent practicable, the need for additional site reviews. Also, this 
    alternative is anticompetitive in that it would exclude new vendors 
    without cause and would arbitrarily limit the choice of cask designs 
    available to power reactor licensees.
        Approval of the proposed rule would eliminate the above problems. 
    Further, the rule, if adopted, would have no adverse effect on public 
    health and safety.
        The benefit of this proposed rule to nuclear power reactor 
    licensees is to make available a greater choice of spent fuel storage 
    cask designs that can be used under a general license. However, the 
    newer cask design may have a market advantage over the existing designs 
    because power reactor licensees may prefer to use the newer casks with 
    improved features. The new cask vendors with casks to be listed in 10 
    CFR 72.214 benefit by having to obtain NRC certificates only once for a 
    design that can then be used by more than one power reactor licensee. 
    Vendors with cask designs already listed may be adversely impacted 
    because power reactor licensees may choose a newly listed design over 
    an existing one. However, the NRC is required by its regulations and 
    the NWPA direction to certify and list approved casks.
        The NRC also benefits because it will need to certify a cask design 
    only once for use by multiple licensees. Casks approved through 
    rulemaking are to be suitable for use under a range of environmental 
    conditions sufficiently broad to encompass multiple nuclear power plant 
    sites in the United States without the need for further site-specific 
    approval by NRC. This proposed rulemaking has no significant 
    identifiable impact or benefit on other Government agencies. Based on 
    the above discussion of the benefits and impacts of the alternatives, 
    the NRC concludes that the requirements of the proposed rule are 
    commensurate with the NRC's responsibilities for public health and 
    safety and the common defense and security. No other available 
    alternative is believed to be as satisfactory, and thus, this action is 
    recommended.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Certification
    
        In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, (5 
    U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC certifies that this rule will not, if 
    promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number 
    of small entities. This proposed rule affects only the licensing and 
    operation of nuclear power plants, independent spent fuel storage 
    facilities, and cask vendors. The companies that own these plants do 
    not fall within the scope of the definition of ``small entities'' set 
    forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act or the Small Business Size 
    Standards set out in regulations issued by the Small Business 
    Administration at 13 CFR part 121.
    
    Backfit Analysis
    
        The NRC has determined that the backfit rule (10 CFR 50.109 or 10 
    CFR 72.62) does not apply to this proposed rule, and thus, a backfit 
    analysis is not required for this proposed rule because this amendment 
    does not involve any provisions that would impose backfits as defined 
    in the backfit rule.
    
    List of Subjects In 10 CFR Part 72
    
        Criminal penalties, Manpower training programs, Nuclear materials, 
    Occupational safety and health, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Security measures, Spent fuel.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of 
    the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization 
    Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 553; the NRC is proposing to 
    adopt the following amendments to 10 CFR part 72.
    
    [[Page 1545]]
    
    PART 72--LICENSING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INDEPENDENT STORAGE OF 
    SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL AND HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE
    
        The authority citation for part 72 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 51, 53, 57, 62, 63, 65, 69, 81, 161, 182, 183, 
    184, 186, 187, 189, 68 Stat. 929, 930, 932, 933, 934, 935, 948, 953, 
    954, 955, as amended, sec. 234, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C. 
    2071, 2073, 2077, 2092, 2093, 2095, 2099, 2111, 2201, 2232, 2233, 
    2234, 2236, 2237, 2238, 2282); sec. 274, Pub. L. 86-373, 73 Stat. 
    688, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2021); sec. 201, as amended, 202, 206, 88 
    Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846); 
    Pub. L. 95-601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951 as amended by Pub. L. 10d--
    48b, sec. 7902, 10b Stat. 31b3 (42 U.S.C. 5851); sec. 102, Pub. L. 
    91-190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332); secs. 131, 132, 133, 135, 
    137, 141, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2229, 2230, 2232, 2241, sec. 148, 
    Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10151, 10152, 10153, 
    10155, 10157, 10161, 10168).
        Section 72.44(g) also issued under secs. 142(b) and 148(c), (d), 
    Pub. L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-232, 1330-236 (42 U.S.C. 10162(b), 
    10168(c),(d)). Section 72.46 also issued under sec. 189, 68 Stat. 
    955 (42 U.S.C. 2239); sec. 134, Pub. L. 97-425, 96 Stat. 2230 (42 
    U.S.C. 10154). Section 72.96(d) also issued under sec. 145(g), Pub. 
    L. 100-203, 101 Stat. 1330-235 (42 U.S.C. 10165(g)). Subpart J also 
    issued under secs. 2(2), 2(15), 2(19), 117(a), 141(h), Pub. L. 97-
    425, 96 Stat. 2202, 2203, 2204, 2222, 2244, (42 U.S.C. 10101, 
    10137(a), 10161(h)). Subparts K and L are also issued under sec. 
    133, 98 Stat. 2230 (42 U.S.C. 10153) and sec. 218(a), 96 Stat. 2252 
    (42 U.S.C. 10198).
    
        In Sec. 72.214, Certificate of Compliance (CoC) 1008 is added to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 72.214  List of approved spent fuel storage casks.
    
    * * * * *
    Certificate Number: 1008
    SAR Submitted by: Holtec International
    SAR Title: HI-STAR 100 Cask System Topical Safety Analysis Report 
    (TSAR), Revision 8
    Docket Number: 72-1008
    Certification Expiration Date: (20 years after final rule effective 
    date)
    Model Numbers: HI-STAR 100
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of December 1998.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    William D. Travers,
    Executive Director for Operations.
    [FR Doc. 99-505 Filed 1-8-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/11/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
99-505
Dates:
The comment period expires March 29, 1999. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to assure consideration only for comments received on or before this date.
Pages:
1542-1545 (4 pages)
PDF File:
99-505.pdf
CFR: (1)
10 CFR 72.214