95-696. Final Review Criterion and Indicators for Grants for Family Medicine Training and Grants for General Internal Medicine and General Pediatrics Training Grants for Family Medicine Training and Grants for General Internal Medicine and General ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 2976-2978]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-696]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    Health Resources and Services Administration
    RIN 0905-ZA45
    
    Final Review Criterion and Indicators for Grants for Family 
    Medicine Training and Grants for General Internal Medicine and General 
    Pediatrics Training
        Grants for Family Medicine Training and Grants for General Internal 
    Medicine and General Pediatrics Training are authorized by sections 747 
    (a) and (b) and 748, title VII of the Public Health Service Act, as 
    amended by the Health Professions Education Extension Amendments of 
    1992, Pub. L. 102-408, dated October 13, 1992. These grant programs 
    include:
    Grants for Predoctoral Training in Family Medicine
    Grants for Graduate Training in Family Medicine
    Grants for Faculty Development in Family Medicine
    Grants for Establishment of Departments of Family Medicine
    Grants for Residency Training in General Internal Medicine and General 
    Pediatrics
    Grants for Faculty Development in General Internal Medicine and General 
    Pediatrics
        A notice was published in the Federal Register at 59 FR 50423 on 
    October 3, 1994 to review criterion and indicators for Grants for 
    Family Medicine Training and Grants for General Internal Medicine and 
    General Pediatrics Training. No comments were received within the 30 
    day comment period. Therefore, the review criterion and indicators 
    remain as proposed.
    
    Review Criteria
    
        The following review criteria were established in 42 CFR part 57, 
    subparts Q, R, and FF.
        1. The administrative and management ability of the applicant to 
    carry out the proposed project in a cost-effective manner.
        2. The potential of the project to continue on a self-sustaining 
    basis after the period of grant support.
        3. The degree to which the proposed project adequately provides for 
    the project requirements.
        In addition, the following review criterion is finalized for FY 
    1995:
        4. Potential effectiveness of the proposed project in carrying out 
    the training purposes of sections 747 or 748 of the PHS Act.
    
    Weighted Indicators
    
    Criterion 1: Potential Effectiveness of the Proposed Project in 
    Carrying Out the Training Purposes of Sections 747 and 748 of the PHS 
    Act
    
    Indicator 1--Institutional Environment--20 points
        Proposal describes the actions taken by the institution (i.e., 
    department, medical school, or other sponsoring health care delivery 
    institution) that demonstrate a high level of support for and promotion 
    of generalist training and practice in community-based settings within 
    underserved urban and rural communities and populations. Examples 
    include organizational mission statements describing support for 
    training and graduating generalists in the primary care disciplines, 
    institutional financial support for such programs, institutional 
    support for rural [[Page 2977]] practices such as locum tenens, l-800 
    numbers for consultations, visiting faculty status for rural 
    practitioners, complementary institutional and other resources to 
    support such programs, and adequate representation of generalist 
    faculty on key academic committees such as Admissions, Selection, 
    Tenure, and Faculty Recruitment.
    Indicator 2--Strategic Outcomes--20 points
        Proposal describes a strategy for the institution's training 
    program that will lead to or sustain a high level of graduates entering 
    generalist residencies and/or practice.
    Indicator 3--Generalist Faculty--10 points
        Proposal includes strong, clinically-oriented generalist faculty 
    who practice in community-based settings that include underserved 
    populations.
    Indicator 4--Promotion of Workforce Diversity--20 points
        Proposal includes a strategy and plan for recruiting and retaining 
    underrepresented minority and disadvantaged faculty, students, trainees 
    and/or residents. Proposal describes the current and projected levels 
    of participation of these underrepresented groups in the program. 
    Applicants are expected to reflect the diversity of the populations 
    within their states.
    Indicator 5--Critical Training Emphasis--10 points
        Proposal includes reference to a curriculum that incorporates 
    Healthy People 2000 objectives in one or more of the following content 
    areas: HIV/AIDS epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment; 
    substance abuse; or clinical preventive services. Wherever necessary, 
    curriculum is appropriate to the needs of the patient population 
    (culturally competent regarding ethnicity, gender, and sexual 
    orientation) whether that population is urban, rural or underserved.
    Indicator 6--Interdisciplinary Training--10 points
        Except for Faculty Development projects, proposal provides for 
    interdisciplinary clinical training opportunities, i.e., a training 
    environment in which students, interns and/or residents learn to work 
    in teams including varied health care professionals and/or primary care 
    disciplines. The environment is such that the important contributions 
    by each member of the health care team are recognized and utilized in 
    the primary care setting.
    Indicator 7--Clinical Training Settings--10 points
        Except for Faculty Development projects, proposal provides for 
    clinical training in community-based settings within underserved areas 
    or populations.
    Indicator 8--Primary Care Preceptorship--10 points
        For Departments of Family Medicine and Predoctoral Training 
    Programs Only: Training includes a primary care preceptorship that: 1) 
    occurs in the first or second year and is at least four weeks in 
    duration; or 2) is a longitudinal experience of at least five days per 
    semester in both the first and second years.
    Indicator 9--Third-Year Clerkship--20 points
        For Departments of Family Medicine and Predoctoral Training 
    Programs Only: Training includes a required third-year clerkship in 
    family medicine of at least four-weeks duration.
    Indicator 10--Faculty Expertise--30 points
        For Faculty Development Programs Only: Proposal includes adequate 
    balance in faculty expertise to teach the proposed curriculum, e.g., 
    teaching skills, administrative and management skills, or primary care 
    research.
    Indicator 11--Generalism Outcomes/Continuity of Care--30 points
        For General Internal Medicine and/or General Pediatrics Residency 
    Training Program Only: Competing continuation General Internal Medicine 
    and/or General Pediatrics program demonstrates a consecutive 3-year 
    track record of 80% or more graduates entering primary care careers. IN 
    ADDITION, by the beginning of the second year of grant support the 
    competing continuation OR NEW General Internal Medicine and/or General 
    Pediatrics program will provide ALL PGY-1 residents (primary care and 
    traditional) entering the Internal Medicine and/or Pediatrics residency 
    with continuity of care training experience comprising a total of 20% 
    (average) over the 3-year training period, scheduled in at least 9 
    months of each year of training.
    
    Criterion 2: Administration and Management Ability of the Applicant to 
    Carry Out the Proposed Project in a Cost-Effective Manner
    
    Indicator 1--Project Rationale--30 points
        Project plan includes a background statement, a statement of need 
    for the project, and a specific rationale justifying the proposed 
    project. Project plan also describes the links between this proposed 
    project and an effective larger institutional program, i.e., the 
    department, division, residency, etc. This section of the project plan 
    will define the larger purposes of the project, i.e., in what way the 
    project will cause an improvement or expansion in the capability of the 
    larger educational institution or program to deliver quality primary 
    care training.
        For competing continuation proposals, a progress report is 
    provided. At a minimum, the report includes a summary of the funded 
    objectives and the accomplishments made during the project period. 
    Progress report includes evaluation data related to each of the project 
    objectives. For applicants who are not currently funded, but who have 
    received funding within the last four years, a discussion is included 
    in the application describing the previously funded objectives, 
    accomplishments and evaluation data relative to those objectives.
    Indicator 2--Project Objectives--40 points
        Project plan contains a detailed description of the project's 
    objectives with measurement indicators for each objective. The plan 
    also includes a description of the methods that will be used to 
    implement the project, e.g., educational strategy, timetable and a 
    resource plan that outlines the faculty, staff, facilities and 
    equipment that will be used, including identification of those 
    resources that already exist or that will be made available by the 
    institution.
    Indicator 3--Budget Justification--30 points
        Project plan indicates the degree to which the proposed objectives 
    relate to the budget narrative and justifies the budget items 
    requested.
    Indicator 4--Evaluation Plan--10 points
        Project plan includes an evaluation strategy for the proposed 
    project to determine achievements in relation to project objectives. 
    [[Page 2978]] 
    Indicator 5--Anticipated Problems--10 points
        Project plan defines the problems anticipated in implementing the 
    project and the proposed approaches to resolving such problems as may 
    arise.
    Indicator 6--Institutional Collaboration--15 points
        Project plan includes documentation of the support of individuals 
    or organizations who will collaborate in implementation of this 
    proposed project. Letters of support for the project from the 
    institution, department, faculty, etc., are included. For Faculty 
    Development projects, letters from potential/actual trainees are 
    included.
    Indicator 7--Trainee Grid--10 points
        Except for Departments of Family Medicine, project plan includes a 
    ``trainee grid'' that defines the type of individuals being trained, 
    how many will be trained, and when they will be trained.
        For General Internal Medicine and General Pediatrics Residencies, 
    the grid should also reflect actual and projected numbers of primary 
    care and traditional residents.
    
    Criterion 3: Economic Viability--The Potential of the Project to 
    Continue on a Self-Sustaining Basis After the Period of the Project 
    Grant
    
    Indicator 1--Continuation Support--10 points
        Proposed projects demonstrate how their support will be continued 
    after cessation of Federal funding. If other projects have been funded 
    under this grant program within the past five years, a financial report 
    discusses how terminated Federal funds have been replaced.
    Indicator 2--Non-Federal Support--10 points
        Financial and in-kind support is or will be provided by state or 
    local government, institution, medical school, department, patient 
    fees, or other private funding sources to supplement the Federal grant.
    
    Criterion 4: Degree to Which the Proposed Project Adequately Provides 
    for the Project Requirements
    
        (These indicators (project requirements) have been established in 
    42 CFR part 57, subparts Q, R, and FF and are summarized below.)
    Establishing Departments of Family Medicine
    Indicator 1--Project Director--10 Points
    Indicator 2--Administrative Autonomy--15 points
    Indicator 3--Control Over Residency Program--10 points
    Indicator 4--Evaluation Plans--10 points
    Indicator 5--Family Medicine Instruction--10 points
    Indicator 6--Full-Time Faculty--10 points
    Indicator 7--Academic Status--10 points
    Family Medicine Residencies
    Indicator 1--Accreditation Status--40 points
    
        Proposal includes a letter of accreditation from the ACGME/RRC or a 
    letter of approval from the AOA verifying that the residency meets all 
    requirements. All such projects are considered to have satisfied the 
    Project Requirements. To the extent that problems are noted by the 
    accrediting body, the project plan addresses the problems and has a 
    plausible plan for their correction. New programs which have not yet 
    been accredited must meet the project requirements specified in 
    regulations at 42 CFR 57.1604.
    Family Medicine Faculty Development
    Indicator 1--Project Director--10 points
    Indicator 2--Administrative & Organizational Plan--10 points
    Indicator 3--Evaluation Plans--10 points
    Indicator 4--Curriculum--25 points
    Indicator 5--Eligible Trainees--10 points
    Indicator 6--Number of Trainees--0 points
    Indicator 7--Length of Training--0 points
    Indicator 8--Trainee Support--0 points
    Family Medicine Predoctoral Training
    Indicator 1--Project Director--10 points
    Indicator 2--Administrative & Organizational Plan--10 points
    Indicator 3--Evaluation Plans--10 points
    Indicator 4--Ambulatory Care Training Settings--20 points
    Indicator 5--Curriculum--10 points
    Indicator 6--Sponsoring Unit--10 points
    Indicator 7--Institutional Strategy--10 points
    General Internal Medicine and General Pediatrics Residencies
    Indicator 1--Project Director--10 points
    Indicator 2--Administrative & Organizational Plan--10 points
    Indicator 3--Curriculum Development and Evaluation Coordinator--10 
    points
    Indicator 4--Faculty and Training Personnel--10 points
    Indicator 5--Behavioral Science Faculty--10 points
    Indicator 6--Resident Recruitment and Selection--10 points
    Indicator 7--Requirement for Stipend Support--0 points
    Indicator 8--Number and Distribution of Residents--10 points
    Indicator 9--Ambulatory Care Training Setting--10 points
    Indicator 10--Continuity of Care Experience--0 points
    Indicator 11--Other Ambulatory Patient Care Experiences--10 points
    Indicator 12--Curriculum Content and Evaluation of Educational 
    Offerings--20 points
    Indicator 13--Evaluation of Residents--10 points
    General Internal Medicine and General Pediatrics Faculty Development
    Indicator 1--Project Director--10 points
    Indicator 2--Administrative & Organizational Plan--10 points Indicator 
    3--Curriculum--25 points
    Indicator 4--Evaluation Plans--10 points
    Indicator 5--Eligible Trainees--10 points
    Indicator 6--Eligibility for Trainee Stipend Support--0 points
    Indicator 7--Length of Training for Stipend Support--0 points
    
        If additional information is needed, please contact: Enrique 
    Fernandez, M.D., Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, 
    Health Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building, Room 
    9A-20, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone: (301) 
    443-1467, FAX: (301) 443-8890.
    
        Dated: January 5, 1995.
    Ciro V. Sumaya,
    Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 95-696 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-15-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/12/1995
Department:
Health Resources and Services Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-696
Pages:
2976-2978 (3 pages)
RINs:
0905-ZA45
PDF File:
95-696.pdf