95-717. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Relating to Market Maker Appointments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 8 (Thursday, January 12, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 3012-3013]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-717]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-35192; File No. SR-CBOE-94-44]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule 
    Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc., Relating to Market 
    Maker Appointments
    
    January 4, 1995.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on November 14, 1994, the 
    Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE'' or ``Exchange'') filed 
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
    proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which 
    Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The 
    Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
    proposed rule change from interested persons.
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The CBOE proposes to amend CBOE Rule 8.3(c) concerning the number 
    of trading stations at which a single market maker's appointed classes 
    of options are traded.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
    included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
    proposed rule change [[Page 3013]] and discussed any comments it 
    received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may 
    be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-
    regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in sections 
    (A), (B) and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such 
    statements.
    
    (A) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to revise CBOE Rule 
    8.3(c) to give the Market Performance Committee (``MPC'') authority to 
    designate the maximum number of trading stations at which a single 
    market marker's appointed classes of options are traded, and to add 
    Interpretation and Policy .02 to CBOE Rule 8.3 to state that the MPC 
    has designated such maximum number as ten trading stations. CBOE Rule 
    8.3 currently sets a five station upper limit on the maximum number of 
    trading stations that may be covered by a single market maker's 
    appointment.
        In light of the recent and anticipated increases in both the number 
    of options classes traded on the Exchange and the number of trading 
    stations on the floor, the Exchange has determined that it needs 
    greater flexibility to increase this limit from time to time in order 
    to be able to respond promptly to any need for greater market maker 
    participation that may result from such expansion. By granting 
    authority to fix this number to the MPC, which already has the 
    authority to grant exceptions to the current five-station limit on a 
    case-by case basis, the Exchange believes it will have achieved the 
    flexibility it needs. When and if the MPC changes the limit from ten 
    stations as it is here proposing, the new limit will be reflected in a 
    revision to Interpretation and Policy .02 under the Rule filed under 
    Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act as a stated policy, practice, or 
    interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration, or 
    enforcement of Rule 8.3.\2\
    
        \2\Although the CBOE has stated its desire to rely on section 
    19(b)(3)(A) of the Act if it should seek to change the limit, the 
    Commission has requested that the CBOE provide it with additional 
    information to justify the appropriateness of such reliance.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The CBOE believes that the proposed increase in the current limit 
    under Rule 8.3(c) from five to ten stations reflects that, in light of 
    the expansion of the number of options classes traded in CBOE's 
    marketplace and in the number of stations at which options are traded, 
    a five-station limit is unduly restrictive and places CBOE's market 
    makers at a competitive disadvantage in relation to options market 
    makers on other exchanges. Currently, the five-station maximum limits 
    an individual market maker's affirmative market making obligations to, 
    at most, slightly more than 9% of the trading stations on the floor, or 
    less than 25% of all CBOE classes. To assure adequate market maker 
    coverage of all classes traded on the CBOE, enlargement of the current 
    five station limit to ten stations is needed.
        In addition, CBOE believes that the importance of maintaining 
    comparability among exchanges regarding the percentage of the classes 
    traded in which a market maker may hold an appointment is not limited 
    to general reasons of competitive fairness and equality. Comparability 
    is also important because under the new short sale rule applicable to 
    stocks traded in the Nasdaq market, the exception to the short sale 
    rule for options market makers only applies to stocks underlying 
    options in which the market maker holds an appointment. So long as CBOE 
    market makers limited to holding appointments in less than 25% of the 
    classes traded on the Exchange, CBOE's market makers will be at a 
    competitive disadvantage in respect of their ability to hedge their 
    options positions pursuant to the market maker exemption from the NASD 
    short sale rule. CBOE recently filed a proposed rule change that would 
    amend its Rule 15.10 by eliminating the provision that restricts the 
    market maker exemption to Nasdaq National Market securities underlying 
    options traded at no more than three stations. Instead, the market 
    maker exemption would be available for all options classes to which a 
    market maker holds an appointment.\3\
    
        \3\See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34947 (November 7, 
    1994), 59 FR 59262 (File No. SR-CBOE-94-38), proposing to amend CBOE 
    Rule 15.10(c)(2)(ii)(B).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The proposed amendment is intended to enhance the ability of the 
    Exchange to provide fair and orderly markets in options and to provide 
    for competitive equality among exchanges, and therefore the Exchange 
    believes that its proposal is consistent with the promotion of just and 
    equitable principles of trade and the protection of investors and the 
    public interest as required by Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.
    
    (B) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any 
    burden on competition.
    
    (C) Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the 
    Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
    
        Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited 
    nor received.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
    Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
    designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
    be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
    which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
        (a) By order approve such proposed rule change, or
        (b) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
    change should be disapproved.
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., 
    Washington, D.C. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the above-mentioned 
    self-regulatory organization. All submissions should refer to File No. 
    SR-CBOE-94-44 and should be submitted by February 2, 1995.
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
    
        \4\17 CFR 200.30-3)(a)(12) (1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-717 Filed 1-11-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/12/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-717
Pages:
3012-3013 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-35192, File No. SR-CBOE-94-44
PDF File:
95-717.pdf