00-499. Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and - 300 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 65, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2000)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 1765-1767]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 00-499]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 99-NM-357-AD; Amendment 39-11504; AD 2000-01-07]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -
    300 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that 
    is applicable to certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -300 
    series airplanes. This action requires the removal and testing of 
    sections of bonded skin from the upper and lower skin panels of the 
    horizontal stabilizer, repair of those areas, and follow-on corrective 
    actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of 
    mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil 
    airworthiness authority. The actions specified in this AD are intended 
    to prevent reduced strength capability and consequent failure of the 
    horizontal stabilizer, which could result in loss of controllability of 
    the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective January 27, 2000.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of January 27, 2000.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before February 11, 2000.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-NM-357-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056.
        The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from 
    Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt 
    Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada. This information may be 
    examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Engine and Propeller 
    Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, 
    Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Serge Napoleon, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE-171, FAA, Engine and Propeller 
    Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, 
    Third Floor, Valley Stream, New York 11581; telephone (516) 256-7512; 
    fax (516) 568-2716.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), 
    which is the airworthiness authority for Canada, notified the FAA that 
    an unsafe condition may exist on certain Bombardier Model DHC-8-100, -
    200, and -300 series airplanes. TCCA advises that it received results 
    of previous inspections to detect disbonding of the upper and lower 
    skin panels of the horizontal stabilizer. Results of these inspections 
    indicate that certain doublers and stringers were disbonded from their 
    skin panels. The subject doublers and stringers are installed on the 
    upper and lower skin panels of the horizontal stabilizer at stations 
    Yh6.15-139.00 between the front spar and rear spar. The cause of such 
    disbonding has been attributed to an improper bonding process of the 
    skin panels of the doublers and stringers during manufacturing. This 
    condition, if not corrected, could result in reduced strength 
    capability and consequent failure of horizontal stabilizer, which could 
    further result in loss of controllability of the airplane.
        TCCA has recommended further testing on sample coupons of the 
    sections of skin panels to determine the bonding integrity of the skin 
    panels. A destructive peel test would be conducted on the removed 
    sections of bonded skin (test coupons) by the manufacturer. This type 
    of testing would determine how much force is necessary in order to 
    separate the bonded layers of the skin panel.
    
    Explanation of Relevant Service Information
    
        The manufacturer has issued Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-55-
    24, dated February 26, 1998, which describes procedures for replacement 
    of the horizontal stabilizer with a new horizontal stabilizer.
        Accomplishment of the test on the sample coupons and, if necessary, 
    accomplishment of the actions specified in the service bulletin is 
    intended to adequately address the identified unsafe condition. TCCA 
    approved this service bulletin and issued Canadian airworthiness 
    directive CF-99-15R1, dated December 6, 1999, in order to assure the 
    continued airworthiness of these airplanes in Canada.
    
    Related Rulemaking
    
        On November 16, 1998, the FAA issued AD 98-24-18, amendment 39-
    10903 (63 FR 64609, November 23, 1998), applicable to certain 
    Bombardier Model DHC-8-100 and -300 series airplanes equipped with 
    Canadian Aviation Products (CAP) horizontal stabilizers having serial 
    numbers 003 through 214, that requires repetitive ultrasonic 
    inspections to detect disbonding of the upper and lower skin panels of 
    the horizontal stabilizer, and repair, if necessary. Based on the 
    information provided by TCCA, the FAA has determined that an additional 
    disbonding test of the skin panels is needed on airplanes equipped with 
    CAP horizontal stabilizers having serial numbers 003 through 050, the 
    repetitive ultrasonic inspections required by AD 98-24-18 may not be 
    adequate to detect disbonding of the upper and lower skin panels of the 
    horizontal stabilizer, and, therefore, may not be providing an adequate 
    level of safety for the transport airplane fleet. This AD affects the 
    requirements of that AD. For certain airplanes, the corrective actions 
    of this AD eliminate the need for the repetitive inspections required 
    by AD 98-24-18.
    
    FAA's Conclusions
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in Canada and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, TCCA has kept the FAA informed of 
    the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of 
    TCCA, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action 
    is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of Requirements of Rule
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered 
    in the United States, this AD is being issued to prevent reduced 
    strength capability of the horizontal stabilizer and consequent failure 
    of the horizontal stabilizer,
    
    [[Page 1766]]
    
    which could result in loss of controllability of the airplane. This AD 
    requires removal and testing of the sections of bonded skin from the 
    upper and lower skin panels of the horizontal stabilizer, repair of 
    those areas, and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary. Certain 
    actions (removal and repair) are required to be accomplished in 
    accordance with a method approved by the Manager, FAA, Engine and 
    Propeller Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO). 
    Other actions (replacement) are required to be accomplished in 
    accordance with the service bulletin described previously.
    
    Determination of Rule's Effective Date
    
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
    public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 99-NM-357-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct 
    effect on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it 
    is determined that this final rule does not have federalism 
    implications under Executive Order 13132.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    2000-01-07 Bombardier, INC. (Formerly de Havilland, Inc.): Amendment 
    39-11504. Docket 99-NM-357-AD.
    
    
        Applicability: Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes, 
    certificated in any category; equipped with Canadian Aviation 
    Products (CAP) horizontal stabilizers having serial numbers CAP 003 
    through CAP 050 inclusive.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent reduced strength capability of the horizontal 
    stabilizer and consequent failure of the horizontal stabilizer, 
    which could result in loss of controllability of the airplane, 
    accomplish the following:
    
    Removal of Skin Sections
    
        (a) Within 2 months after the effective date of this AD, 
    accomplish the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3) 
    of this AD.
        (1) Remove sections of bonded skin (test coupons) from the upper 
    panel P/N 85510026, and the lower skin panel P/N 85510025, of the 
    horizontal stabilizer port and starboard side, at stations Yh77.50-
    90.90 between stringer number 6 and the rear spar, in accordance 
    with a method approved by the Manager, FAA, Engine and Propeller 
    Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO); and
        (2) Mark and send for testing the removed sections of bonded 
    skin to the attention of M. Elliott X3177 or M. Clark X3092, 
    Bombardier Aerospace Mailroom (A.O.G.), 123 Garratt Boulevard, 
    Downsview, Ontario, Canada, M3K-1Y5; and
        (3) Repair the areas where the sections of bonded skin were 
    removed, in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, FAA, 
    Engine and Propeller Directorate, New York Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO). After the repair, the airplane may be returned to 
    service while awaiting test results.
    
        Note 2: The Manager, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, New 
    York ACO, has approved Bombardier Repair Drawing RD8-55-669, Issue 
    3, dated March 17, 1999, as an acceptable method for accomplishing 
    the actions required by paragraph (a) of this AD. Operators should 
    note that the repair drawing recommends a one-time ultrasonic 
    inspection to detect disbonding on the stringers and doublers of the 
    horizontal stabilizer. However, the approved method of compliance 
    does not require the ultrasonic inspection.
    
    Corrective Actions
    
        (b) Within 30 days following the removal of the sections of 
    bonded skin (test coupons) from the upper and lower skin panels of 
    the horizontal stabilizer, determine the test results and accomplish 
    paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
        (1) For airplanes on which all sections of bonded skin (test 
    coupons) pass the test required by this AD, no further action is 
    required by this AD.
    
    [[Page 1767]]
    
        (2) For airplanes on which any section of bonded skin (test 
    coupon) fails the test, prior to further flight, either replace the 
    horizontal stabilizer with a new horizontal stabilizer in accordance 
    with Bombardier Service Bulletin S.B. 8-55-24, dated February 26, 
    1998, or repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, 
    New York ACO.
        (c) Model DHC-8-100, -200, and -300 series airplanes, equipped 
    with Canadian Aviation Products (CAP) horizontal stabilizers having 
    serial numbers CAP 003 through CAP 050 inclusive: Passing the test 
    on all sections of bonded skin constitutes terminating action for 
    the repetitive inspections required by AD 98-24-18, amendment 39-
    10903. Accomplishment of either the replacement or an approved 
    repair, as required by paragraph (b)(2) of this AD, on any airplane 
    on which any section of bonded skin fails the test also constitutes 
    terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by AD 98-
    24-18, amendment 39-10903.
    
        Note 3: Following accomplishment of the requirements of this AD, 
    the horizontal stabilizer remains subject to the normal bonding 
    integrity inspection program, which is performed in accordance with 
    de Havilland Product Support Manual (PSM) 1-8-7.
    
    Alternative Methods of Compliance
    
        (d) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, New York ACO. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, New York ACO.
    
        Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the New York ACO.
    
    Special Flight Permits
    
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
    Incorporation by Reference
    
        (f) Except as provided by paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(3) of this 
    AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with Bombardier Service 
    Bulletin S.B. 8-55-24, dated February 26, 1998, as applicable. This 
    incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 
    51. Copies may be obtained from Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier 
    Regional Aircraft Division, Garratt Boulevard, Downsview, Ontario 
    M3K 1Y5, Canada. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or 
    at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, New York Aircraft 
    Certification Office, 10 Fifth Street, Third Floor, Valley Stream, 
    New York; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
        Note 5: The subject of this AD is addressed in Canadian 
    airworthiness directive CF-99-15R1, dated December 6, 1999.
    
        (g) This amendment becomes effective on January 27, 2000.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 4, 2000.
    Donald L. Riggin,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 00-499 Filed 1-11-00; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/27/2000
Published:
01/12/2000
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
00-499
Dates:
Effective January 27, 2000.
Pages:
1765-1767 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99-NM-357-AD, Amendment 39-11504, AD 2000-01-07
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
00-499.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13