2021-00362. Notice of Determination Pursuant to Section 301: India's Digital Services Tax  

  • Start Preamble

    AGENCY:

    Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).

    ACTION:

    Notice.

    SUMMARY:

    The U.S. Trade Representative has determined that India's Digital Services Tax (DST) is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce and thus is actionable under Section 301.

    Start Further Info

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

    For questions concerning the investigation, please contact Thomas Au or Patrick Childress, Assistant General Counsels at (202) 395-0380 and (202) 395-9531, respectively, Robert Tanner, Director, Services and Investment at (202) 395-6125, or Brendan Lynch, Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative, South and Central Asian Affairs, 202-395-2851.

    End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    I. India's DST

    Based on information obtained during the investigation, USTR has prepared a comprehensive report on India's DST (India DST Report). The India DST Report, which is posted on the USTR website at https://ustr.gov/​issue-areas/​enforcement/​section-301-investigations/​section-301-digital-services-taxes,, includes a full description of India's DST. To summarize, India adopted the operative form of its DST on March 27, 2020. India's DST imposes a two percent tax on revenue generated from a broad range of digital services offered in India, including digital platform services, digital content sales, digital sales of a company's own goods, data-related services, software-as-a-service, and several other categories of digital services. India's DST only applies to “non-resident” companies. The tax applies as of April 1, 2020.

    II. Proceedings in the Investigation

    On June 2, 2020, the U.S. Trade Representative initiated an investigation of India's DST pursuant to section 302(b)(1)(A) of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (Trade Act). 85 FR 34709 (June 5, 2020) (notice of initiation). The notice of initiation solicited written comments on, inter alia, the following aspects of India's DST: Discrimination against U.S. companies and unreasonableness as tax policy. With respect to unreasonable tax policy, USTR solicited comments on, inter alia, whether the DST diverges from principles reflected in the U.S. and international tax systems, including extraterritorial application and taxing revenue rather than income.

    Interested persons filed over 380 written submissions in response to the notice of initiation. The public submissions are available on www.regulations.gov in docket number USTR-2020-0022.

    Under Section 303 of the Trade Act, the U.S. Trade Representative requested consultations with the Government of India regarding the issues involved in the investigation. Consultations were held on November 5, 2020.

    As noted, based on information obtained during the investigation, USTR has prepared and published the India DST Report, which includes a comprehensive discussion on whether the acts, policies, and practices under investigation are actionable under Section 301(b) of the Trade Act. The India DST Report supports findings that India's DST is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce.

    III. Determination on the Act, Policy, or Practice Under Investigation

    Based on the information obtained during the investigation, and taking account of public comments and the advice of the Section 301 Committee and advisory committees, the U.S. Trade Representative has made the following determination under sections 301(b) and 304(a) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C. 2411(b) and 2414(a)): The act, policy, or practice covered in the investigation, namely India's DST, is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts U.S. commerce, and is thus actionable Start Printed Page 2479under section 301(b) of the Trade Act. In particular:

    1. India's DST, by its structure and operation, discriminates against U.S. digital companies, including due to the selection of covered services and its applicability only to non-resident companies.

    2. India's DST is unreasonable because it is inconsistent with principles of international taxation, including due to its application to revenue rather than income, extraterritorial application, and failure to provide tax certainty.

    3. India's DST burdens or restricts U.S. commerce.

    IV. Further Proceedings

    Sections 301(b) and 304(a)(1)(B) of the Trade Act provides that if the U.S. Trade Representative determines that an act, policy, or practice of a foreign country is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts United States commerce, the U.S. Trade Representative shall determine what action, if any, to take under Section 301(b). These matters will be addressed in subsequent proceedings under Section 301.

    Start Signature

    Joseph Barloon,

    General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

    End Signature End Supplemental Information

    [FR Doc. 2021-00362 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]

    BILLING CODE 3290-F0-P

Document Information

Published:
01/12/2021
Department:
Trade Representative, Office of United States
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
2021-00362
Pages:
2478-2479 (2 pages)
PDF File:
2021-00362.pdf
Supporting Documents:
» Amendment to Product Exclusion and Product Exclusion Extension: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation
» Determination Pursuant to Section 301: India's Digital Services Tax
» Product Exclusion Extensions and Additional Modifications: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation
» Extension of Particular Exclusions Granted Under the $300 Billion Action Pursuant to Section 301: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation
» Product Exclusions: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation
» Product Exclusion Extensions: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation
» Hearings: Trade Distorting Policies That May Be Affecting Seasonal and Perishable Products in U.S. Commerce
» Product Exclusion Amendments: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation
» Review of Action: Enforcement of U.S. WTO Rights in Large Civil Aircraft Dispute; Amendment
» Extension of Particular Exclusions: China's Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation