00-817. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc., Implementing a Pilot Program to Assess a Monthly Capital Funding Fee  

  • [Federal Register Volume 65, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2000)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 2216-2218]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 00-817]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-42318; File No. SR-Phlx-99-49]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
    Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the 
    Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc., Implementing a Pilot Program to 
    Assess a Monthly Capital Funding Fee
    
    January 5, 2000.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 196-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
    on November 26, 1999, the Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Phlx'' 
    or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
    Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the 
    Exchange. On January 5, 2000, Phlx submitted an amendment to the 
    proposed rule filing (``Amendment No. 1'').\3\ The Commission is 
    publishing this notice and order to solicit comments on the proposed 
    rule change from interested persons and to approve the proposal until 
    April 5, 2000.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \3\ See Letter from Phlx to Marla Chidsey, Attorney, Division of 
    Market Regulation, Commission, from Bob Ackerman, Senior Vice 
    President, Chief Regulatory Officer, Phlx, dated January 5, 2000. 
    Amendment No. 1 provides Phlx's a fee schedule and is attached as 
    Appendix A.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of 
    Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Phlx proposes to amend its schedule of dues, fees, and charges 
    to charge each of the 505 Exchange seat owners \4\ a monthly capital 
    funding fee of $1,500 per seat owned.\5\ The proposed capital funding 
    fee will be implemented under a three-month pilot program to expire on 
    April 5, 2000.\6\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ For the purpose of filing, the term owner is defined as any 
    person or entity who or which is a holder of equitable title to a 
    membership in the Exchange.
        \5\ Although the term ``seat owner'' is not defined in Phlx's 
    Bylaws or the Certificate of Incorporation, the term seat owner is 
    the equivalent of a ``membership owner'' as referenced in Phlx's 
    Bylaws and Certificate of Incorporation. However, a seat owner is 
    not per se a member of the Phlx Exchange. Telephone conversation 
    between Marla Chidsey, Attorney, Division of Market Regulation, 
    Commission, and Bob Ackerman, Senior Vice President, Chief 
    Regulatory Officer, Phlx (January 5, 2000).
        \6\ On November 26, 1999, the Exchange filed for permanent 
    approval of the $1,500 capital funding fee. See SR-Phlx-99-51. On 
    October 1, 1999, the Exchange filed a proposal to charge the monthly 
    $1,500 capital funding fee. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 
    42058 (October 22, 1999), 64 FR 58878 (December 15, 1999). However, 
    on November 17, 1999, the Exchange withdrew SR-Phlx-99-43.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement Regarding the Purpose 
    of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
    concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
    sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
    statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Phlx's schedule 
    of dues, fees, and charges to charge a monthly capital funding of 
    $1,500 per Exchange seat to seat owners.\7\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ Under Phlx's by-laws, seat owners who lease out their seats 
    are not deemed members of the Exchange. See Phlx Rules of Board of 
    Governors, Rules 3, 5, 17, and 18.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The $1,500 capital funding fee will be imposed on each of the 505 
    Exchange seat owners on the last business day of the calendar month. 
    Thus, the owner is responsible for paying the entire subsequent month's 
    fee on the last business day of the prior month.\8\ The Exchange 
    intends to segregate the funds generated from the $1,500 fee from 
    Phlx's general funds.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ For example, owners of record on September 30 will be billed 
    $1,500 for the month of October.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The monthly $1,500 fee is part of the Exchange's long-term 
    financing plan. This monthly fee will provide funding for technological 
    improvements and other capital needs.\9\ Specifically, it is intended 
    to fund capital purchases, including hardware for capacity upgrades, 
    development efforts for decimalization, and trading floor expansion. 
    The revenue raised from the fee will be utilized over a three-year 
    period. At that time the Exchange intends to reevaluate its financing 
    plan to determine whether this fee should continue. The revenge 
    generated from
    
    [[Page 2217]]
    
    the fees will assist the Exchange in remaining competitive in the 
    capital markets environment.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \9\ This fee is distinguished from the Exchange's technology fee 
    in that the technology fee was intended to cover system software 
    modifications, Year 2000 modifications, specific system development 
    (maintenance) costs, SIAC and OPRA communication charges, and 
    ongoing system maintenance charges. The technology fee became 
    effective upon filing in March, 1997. See Securities Exchange Act 
    Release No. 38394 (March 12, 1997), 62 FR 13204 (March 19, 1997) 
    (SR-Phlx-97-09).
        \10\ In addition, the Exchange has separately proposed to amend 
    its schedule of fees, dues, and charges to allow for a monthly 
    credit of up to $1000 to be applied against certain fees, dues, 
    charges and other amounts owed to the Exchange by an owner who is 
    also a member of the Exchange (SR-Phlx-99-54).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general, and 
    with Section 6(b)(4),\12\ in particular, in that it provides for the 
    equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among 
    its members, issuers, and other persons using its facilities.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
        \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchange believes that the proposed rule imposes no burden on 
    competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
    
        The Exchange received no written comments on the proposal.\13\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \13\ However, in connection with SR-Phlx-99-43, see, note 6 
    above, the Exchange received comments from the following parties: 
    Bloom Staloff, Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc., William J. Kramer, Doris 
    Elwell, Benton Partners, Karen D. Janney, Robert Leff, and Vansco, 
    Wayne & Genelly.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, 
    DC 20549-0609. Copies of such filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the Phlx. All 
    submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-99-49 and should be 
    submitted by February 3, 2000.
    
    IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval 
    of Proposed Rule Change
    
        After careful consideration, the Commission finds, for the reasons 
    set forth below, that the Phlx's proposal is consistent with the 
    requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder. 
    Specifically, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with 
    Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.\14\ Section 6(b)(4) of the Act requires 
    that the rules of a national securities exchange provide for the 
    equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among 
    its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities. The 
    proposal is consistent with the Act because it is an across-the-board 
    assessment on all seat owners intended to raise revenues to provide 
    capital improvements to the Exchange that the Phlx has represented are 
    necessary to help the Phlx remain competitive with other markets.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule 
    change prior to the 30th day after the date of publication of notice 
    thereof in the Federal Register. The Phlx has represented that to 
    complete in the current capital market environment the Exchange needs 
    funding to make technological and capital improvements. The Exchange 
    represents that the revenue raised from the fee is necessary to fund 
    capital purchases, including hardware for capacity upgrades, 
    development efforts for decimalization, trading floor expansion, and 
    communication enhancements. Based upon this these representations of 
    the Exchange the Commission deems it appropriate to approve the 
    proposed rule change on an accelerated basis until April 5, 2000.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\15\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Phlx-99-49) is hereby 
    approved on an accelerated basis until April 5, 2000.\16\ In approving 
    this pilot program, the Commission has considered its impact on 
    efficiency, competition, and capital formation.\17\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
        \16\ The Commission's approval of this pilot should not be 
    interpreted as suggesting the Commission is predisposed to approving 
    the proposal permanently.
        \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    
                                   Appendix A
                  [New Text Underlined; Deleted Text Bracketed]
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
     
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Membership dues or Foreign     1,000.00 semi-annually
     Currency User Fees.
    Foreign Currency Option        1,000.00 semi-annually
     Participation Fee.
    Capital Funding Fee \2\......  1,500.00 monthly
    Application Fee..............  200.00
    Initiation Fee...............  1,500.00
    Transfer Fee.................  500.00
    Trading Post/Booth...........  750.00 quarterly
    Controller Space.............  750.00 quarterly
    Floor Facility Fees..........  375.00 quarterly
    Shelf Space on Equity Option   375.00 quarterly
     Trading Floor.
    Direct Wire to the Floor.....  60.00 quarterly
    Telephone System Line          22.50 monthly/per extension
     Extensions.
    Wireless Telephone System....  200.00 monthly
    Execution Services/            200.00 monthly
     Communication Charge.
    Stock Execution Machine        300.00
     Registration Fee (Equity
     Floor).
    Equity, Option, or FCO         750.00 monthly
     Transmission Charge.
    FCO Pricing Tape.............  600.00 monthly
    Option Report Service:
        (New York)...............  600.00 monthly
    
    [[Page 2218]]
    
     
        (Chicago)................  800.00 monthly
    Quotron Equipment............  225.00 monthly
    Instinet, Reuters Equipment..  Cost passed through
    Examination Fee..............  1,000.00 monthly \3\ or pass-through of
                                    another SRO's fees
    Technology Fee \4\...........  600.00 semi-annually
    Review/Process Subordinated    25.00
     Loans.
    Registered Representative
     Registration:
        Initial..................  25.00
        Maintenance..............  25.00 annually
        Transfer.................  25.00
    Option Mailgram Service......  117.00 monthly
    Off-Floor Trader Initial       200.00
     Registration Fee.
    Off-Floor Trader Annual Fee..  200.00
    Computer Equipment Services,   100.00 per service call and 75.00 per
     Repairs or Replacements \5\.   hour (Two hour minimum)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    \1\ An exemption from foreign currency user fees is extended to PHLX
      members also holding title to a foreign currency options
      participation.
    \2\ This fee applies to seat owners (holders of equitable title to a
      membership in the Exchange) and is assessed on a per-membership basis.
      This fee is imposed pursuant to a pilot program in effect from January
      5, 2000 to April 5, 2000.
    \3\ This fee is applicable to member/participant organizations for which
      the PHLX is the DEA. The following organizations are exempt: (1)
      inactive organizations (2) organizations operating from the PHLX
      trading floor which have demonstrated that at least 25% of their
      income as reflected on the most recently submitted FOCUS Report was
      derived from floor activities (3) organizations for any month where
      they incur transaction or clearing fees charged directly by the
      Exchange or by its registered clearing subsidiary, provided that the
      fees exceed the examinations fees for that month; and (4)
      organizations affiliated with an organization exempt from this fee due
      to the second or third category. Affiliation includes an organization
      that is a wholly owned subsidiary of or controlled by or under the
      common control with an exempt member or participant organization. An
      inactive organization is one which had no securities transaction
      revenue, as determined by semi-annual FOCUS reports, as longs as the
      organization continues to have no such revenue each month.
    \4\ An exemption from the technology fee is extended to foreign currency
      options participants who are also affiliated with the Exchange as Phlx
      members.
    \5\ These fees will be effective from January 1, 2000 until March 31,
      2000, unless extended consistent with the requirements of Section
      19(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. At this time, these fees
      will not be applied to participants on the Foreign Currency Options
      Trading Floor.
    \6\ These fees will be effective from January 1, 2000 until March 31,
      2000, unless extended consistent with the requirements of Section
      19(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. At this time, these fees
      will not be applied to participants on the Foreign Currency Options
      Trading Floor.
    
    [FR Doc. 00-817 Filed 1-12-00; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/13/2000
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
00-817
Pages:
2216-2218 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-42318, File No. SR-Phlx-99-49
PDF File:
00-817.pdf