94-1014. Peter A. Gilbertson, Et al.Continuance in Control Exemption Louisville & Indiana Railroad Co.  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-1014]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 14, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION
    [Finance Docket No. 32441]
    
     
    
    Peter A. Gilbertson, Et al.--Continuance in Control Exemption--
    Louisville & Indiana Railroad Co.
    
        Peter A. Gilbertson, H. Terry Hearst, Bruce A. Lieberman, R. 
    Lawrence McCaffrey, Jr., and Harold F. Parmly, noncarrier individuals, 
    have filed a notice of exemption to continue in control of Louisville & 
    Indiana Railroad Company (LIRC) when it becomes a carrier.
        LIRC concurrently filed a notice of exemption in Louisville & I. R. 
    Co.--Acq. and Oper. Exemp.--Consolidated Rail Corp., Finance Docket No. 
    32440, to acquire and operate approximately 115 miles of rail line 
    owned by Consolidated Rail Corporation in Indiana and Kentucky. LIRC 
    expects to consummate the transaction on or about March 12, 1994.
        Four of the filing parties are officers or directors of the 
    Chicago, SouthShore & South Bend Railroad (CSS), a class III rail 
    carrier operating in Indiana and Illinois. All are minority 
    shareholders in CSS's corporate general partner, SouthShore Corporation 
    (a noncarrier), and three are officers and directors of that entity as 
    well. The parties state that: (1) The railroads will not connect with 
    each other or with any railroads in their corporate family; (2) the 
    continuance in control is not part of a series of anticipated 
    transactions that would connect the railroads with each other or any 
    railroad in their corporate family; and (3) the transaction does not 
    involve a class I carrier. The transaction is therefore exempt from the 
    prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11343. See 49 CFR 
    1180.2(d)(2).
        As a condition to use of this exemption, any employees affected by 
    the transaction will be protected by the conditions set forth in New 
    York Dock Ry.--Control--Brooklyn Eastern Dist., 360 I.C.C. 60 (1979).
        Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10505(d) may be 
    filed at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not 
    automatically stay the transaction. Pleadings must be filed with the 
    Commission and served on: Adam M. Mycyk, Weiner, Brodsky, Sidman & 
    Kider, P.C., suite 800, 1350 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
    20005-4797.
    
        Decided: January 7, 1994.
    
        By the Commission, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
    Proceedings.
    Sidney L. Strickland, Jr.,
    
    
    Secretary.
    
    [FR Doc. 94-1014 Filed 1-13-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7035-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/14/1994
Department:
Interstate Commerce Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-1014
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 14, 1994, Finance Docket No. 32441