99-841. Hazelnuts Grown in Oregon and Washington; Establishment of Final Free and Restricted Percentages for the 1998-99 Marketing Year  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 2422-2425]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-841]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 982
    
    [Docket No. FV99-982-1 IFR]
    
    
    Hazelnuts Grown in Oregon and Washington; Establishment of Final 
    Free and Restricted Percentages for the 1998-99 Marketing Year
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes final free and restricted percentages 
    for domestic inshell hazelnuts for the 1998-99 marketing year under the 
    Federal marketing order for hazelnuts grown in Oregon and Washington. 
    The percentages allocate the quantity of domestically produced 
    hazelnuts which may be marketed in the domestic inshell market. The 
    percentages are intended to stabilize the supply of domestic inshell 
    hazelnuts to meet the limited domestic demand for such hazelnuts and 
    provide reasonable returns to producers. This rule was recommended 
    unanimously by the Hazelnut Marketing Board (Board), which is the 
    agency responsible for local administration of the order.
    
    DATES: Effective January 15, 1999. Comments which are received by March 
    15, 1999, will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
    
    ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk, Fruit 
    and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; Fax: (202) 205-6632, or E-mail: 
    moabdocket__clerk@usda.gov. All comments should reference the docket 
    number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal 
    Register and will be available for public inspection in the Office of 
    the Docket Clerk during regular business hours.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa L. Hutchinson, Northwest 
    Marketing Field Office, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, Agricultural 
    Marketing Service, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue, Room 369, Portland, OR 
    97204; telephone: (503) 326-2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440 or George J. 
    Kelhart, Technical Advisor, Marketing Order Administration Branch, 
    Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, Room 2525-S, P.O. Box 96456, 
    Washington, DC 20090-6456; telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-
    6632. Small businesses may request information on complying with this 
    regulation, or obtain a guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and 
    specialty crop marketing agreements and orders by contacting: Jay 
    Guerber, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable 
    Programs, AMS, USDA, P.O. Box 96456, Room 2525-S, Washington, DC 20090-
    6456; telephone: (202)720-2491, Fax: (202) 205-6632, or E-mail: 
    Jay__N__Guerber@usda.gov. You may view the marketing agreement and 
    order small business compliance guide at the following web site: http:/
    /www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing 
    Agreement No. 115 and Order No. 982 (7 CFR Part 982), both as amended, 
    regulating the handling of hazelnuts grown in Oregon and Washington, 
    hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The marketing agreement and 
    order are effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 
    1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the 
    ``Act.''
        The Department of Agriculture (Department) is issuing this rule in 
    conformance with Executive Order 12866.
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil 
    Justice
    
    [[Page 2423]]
    
    Reform. It is intended that this action apply to all merchantable 
    hazelnuts handled during the 1998-99 marketing year (July 1, 1998, 
    through June 30, 1999). This rule will not preempt any State or local 
    laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable 
    conflict with this rule.
        The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted 
    before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the 
    Act, any handler subject to an order may file with the Secretary a 
    petition stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any 
    obligation imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance 
    with law and request a modification of the order or to be exempted 
    therefrom. A handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the 
    petition. After the hearing, the Secretary would rule on the petition. 
    The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any 
    district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her 
    principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review the Secretary's 
    ruling on the petition, provided an action is filed not later than 20 
    days after the date of the entry of the ruling.
        This rule establishes marketing percentages which allocate the 
    quantity of inshell hazelnuts that may be marketed in domestic markets. 
    The Board is required to meet prior to September 20 of each marketing 
    year to compute its marketing policy for that year and compute and 
    announce an inshell trade demand if it determines that volume 
    regulations would tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act. 
    The Board also computes and announces preliminary free and restricted 
    percentages for that year.
        The inshell trade demand is the amount of inshell hazelnuts that 
    handlers may ship to the domestic market throughout the marketing 
    season. The order specifies that the inshell trade demand be computed 
    by averaging the preceding three ``normal'' years' trade acquisitions 
    of inshell hazelnuts, rounded to the nearest whole number. The Board 
    may increase the three-year average by up to 25 percent, if market 
    conditions warrant an increase. The Board's authority to recommend 
    volume regulations and the computations used to determine the 
    percentages are specified in Sec. 982.40 of the order.
        The National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) estimated 
    hazelnut production at 16,500 tons for the Oregon and Washington area. 
    The majority of domestic inshell hazelnuts are marketed in October, 
    November, and December. By November, the marketing season is well under 
    way.
        The quantity marketed is broken down into free and restricted 
    percentages to make available hazelnuts which may be marketed in 
    domestic inshell markets (free) and hazelnuts which must be exported, 
    shelled or otherwise disposed of by handlers (restricted). The 
    preliminary free percentage releases 80 percent of the adjusted inshell 
    trade demand. The preliminary free percentage is expressed as a 
    percentage of the total supply subject to regulation (supply) and is 
    based on the preliminary crop estimate.
        At its August 27, 1998, meeting, the Board computed and announced 
    preliminary free and restricted percentages of 18 percent and 82 
    percent, respectively. The Board used the NASS crop estimate of 16,500 
    tons. The purpose of releasing only 80 percent of the inshell trade 
    demand under the preliminary percentage was to guard against an 
    underestimate of crop size. The preliminary free percentage released 
    2,763 tons of hazelnuts from the 1998 supply for domestic inshell use. 
    The preliminary restricted percentage of the 1998 supply for export and 
    kernel markets totaled 12,623 tons.
        Under the order, the Board must meet a second time, on or before 
    November 15, to recommend interim final and final percentages. The 
    Board uses current crop estimates to calculate interim final and final 
    percentages. The interim final percentages are calculated in the same 
    way as the preliminary percentages and release the remaining 20 percent 
    (to total 100 percent of the inshell trade demand) previously computed 
    by the Board. Final free and restricted percentages may release up to 
    an additional 15 percent of the average of the preceding three years' 
    trade acquisitions to provide an adequate carryover into the following 
    season; (i.e., desirable carryout). The final free and restricted 
    percentages must be effective by June 1, at least 30 days prior to the 
    end of the marketing year, June 30. The final free and restricted 
    percentages can be made effective earlier, if recommended by the Board 
    and approved by the Secretary. Revisions in the marketing policy can be 
    made until February 15 of each marketing year, but the inshell trade 
    demand can only be revised upward, consistent with Sec. 982.40(e).
        The Board met on November 12, 1998, and reviewed and approved an 
    amended marketing policy and recommended the establishment of final 
    free and restricted percentages. The Board decided that market 
    conditions were such that immediate release of an additional 15 percent 
    for desirable carryout would not adversely affect the 1998-99 domestic 
    inshell market. Accordingly, no interim final free and restricted 
    percentages were recommended. Final percentages were recommended at 30 
    percent free and 70 percent restricted. The final percentages release 
    4,115 tons of inshell hazelnuts from the 1998 supply for domestic use.
        The final marketing percentages are based on the Board's final 
    production estimate (14,500 tons) and the following supply and demand 
    information for the 1998-99 marketing year:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       Tons
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Inshell Supply:
      (1) Total production (Board's estimate)......................   14,500
      (2) Less substandard, farm use (disappearance)...............    1,077
      (3)    Merchantable    production (Board's adjusted crop
       estimate; Item 1 minus Item 2)..............................   13,423
      (4) Plus undeclared carryin as of July 1, 1997, subject to
       regulation..................................................      120
      (5) Supply subject to regulation (Item 3 plus Item 4)........   13,543
    Inshell Trade Demand:
      (6) Average trade acquisitions of inshell hazelnuts for three
       prior years.................................................    4,408
      (7) Less declared carryin as of July 1, 1997, not subject to
       regulation..................................................      954
      (8) Adjusted Inshell Trade Demand............................    3,454
      (9) Desirable carryout on August 31, 1999 (15 percent of Item
       6)..........................................................      661
      (10) Adjusted Inshell Trade Demand plus desirable carryout
       (Item 8 plus Item 9)........................................    4,115
    
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Free   Restricted
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Percentages:
      (11) Final percentages (Item 10 divided by Item
       5)  x  100......................................       30         70
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition to complying with the provisions of the order, the 
    Board also considered the Department's 1982 ``Guidelines for Fruit, 
    Vegetable, and Specialty Crop Marketing Orders'' (Guidelines) when 
    making its computations in the marketing policy. This volume control 
    regulation provides a method to collectively limit the supply of 
    inshell hazelnuts available for sale in domestic markets. The 
    Guidelines provide that the domestic inshell market has available a 
    quantity equal to 110 percent of prior years' shipments before 
    secondary market allocations are approved. This provides for plentiful 
    supplies for consumers and for market expansion, while retaining the 
    mechanism for dealing with
    
    [[Page 2424]]
    
    oversupply situations. The established final percentages are based on 
    the final inshell trade demand, and will make available an additional 
    661 tons for desirable carryout. The total free supply for the 1998-99 
    marketing year is 5,069 tons of hazelnuts, which is the final trade 
    demand of 4,408 tons plus the 661 tons for desirable carryout. This 
    amount is 115 percent of prior years' sales and exceeds the goal of the 
    Guidelines.
        Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the 
    economic impact of this rule on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has 
    prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued 
    pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in 
    that they are brought about through group action of essentially small 
    entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small 
    entity orientation and compatibility.
        There are approximately 800 producers of hazelnuts in the 
    production area and approximately 22 handlers subject to regulation 
    under the marketing order. Small agricultural producers have been 
    defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.601) as those 
    having annual receipts of less than $500,000, and small agricultural 
    service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than 
    $5,000,000. Using these criteria, virtually all of the producers are 
    small agricultural producers and an estimated 19 of the 22 handlers are 
    small agricultural service firms. In view of the foregoing, it can be 
    concluded that the majority of hazelnut producers and handlers may be 
    classified as small entities.
        Board meetings are widely publicized in advance of the meetings and 
    are held in a location central to the production area. The meetings are 
    open to all industry members and other interested persons who are 
    encouraged to participate in the deliberations and voice their opinions 
    on topics under discussion. Thus, Board recommendations can be 
    considered to represent the interests of small business entities in the 
    industry.
        Many years of marketing experience led to the development of the 
    current volume control procedures. These procedures have helped the 
    industry solve its marketing problems by keeping inshell supplies in 
    balance with domestic needs. The current volume control procedures 
    fully supply the domestic inshell market while preventing oversupplies 
    in that market.
        Inshell hazelnuts sold to the domestic market provide higher 
    returns to the industry than are obtained from shelling. The inshell 
    market is inelastic and is characterized as having limited demand and 
    being prone to oversupply.
        Industry statistics show that total hazelnut production has varied 
    widely over the last 10 years, from a low of 13,000 tons in 1989 to a 
    high of 47,000 tons in 1997. Average production has been around 27,000 
    tons. While crop size has fluctuated, the volume regulations contribute 
    toward orderly marketing and market stability, and help moderate the 
    variation in returns for all producers and handlers, both large and 
    small. For instance, production in the shortest crop year (1989) was 48 
    percent of the 10-year average (1988-1997). Production in the biggest 
    crop year (1997) was 173 percent of the 10-year average. The percentage 
    releases provide all handlers with the opportunity to benefit from the 
    most profitable domestic inshell market. That market is available to 
    all handlers, regardless of handler size.
        NASS statistics show that the producer price per pound has 
    increased over the last 5 years, from $.32 in 1993 to $.45 in 1997.
        The Board discussed the only alternative to this rule which was not 
    to regulate. Without any regulations in effect, the Board believes that 
    the industry would oversupply the inshell domestic market. Although the 
    1998 hazelnut crop is much smaller than last year, the release of 
    14,500 tons on the domestic inshell market would cause producer returns 
    to decrease drastically, and completely disrupt the market.
        While the level of benefits of this rulemaking is difficult to 
    quantify, the stabilizing effects of the volume regulations impact both 
    small and large handlers positively by helping them maintain and expand 
    markets even though hazelnut supplies fluctuate widely from season to 
    season.
        Hazelnuts produced under the order comprise virtually all of the 
    hazelnuts produced in the United States. This production represents, on 
    average, less than 5 percent of total U.S. tree nut production, and 
    less than 5 percent of the world's hazelnut production.
        This volume control regulation provides a method for the U.S. 
    hazelnut industry to limit the supply of domestic inshell hazelnuts 
    available for sale in the United States. Section 982.40 of the order 
    establishes a procedure and computations for the Board to follow in 
    recommending to the Secretary release of preliminary, interim final, 
    and final quantities of hazelnuts to be released to the free and 
    restricted markets each marketing year. The program results in 
    plentiful supplies for consumers and for market expansion while 
    retaining the mechanism for dealing with oversupply situations.
        Currently, U.S. hazelnut production can be successfully allocated 
    between the inshell domestic and secondary markets. One of the best 
    secondary markets for hazelnuts is the export market. Inshell hazelnuts 
    produced under the marketing order compete well in export markets 
    because of quality. Europe, and Germany in particular, is historically 
    the primary world market for U.S. produced inshell hazelnuts, although 
    China was the largest importer in 1997-98. A third market is for 
    shelled hazelnuts sold domestically. Domestically produced kernels 
    generally command a higher price in the domestic market than imported 
    kernels. The industry is continuing its efforts to develop and expand 
    secondary markets, especially the domestic kernel market. Small 
    business entities, both producers and handlers, benefit from the 
    expansion efforts resulting from this program.
        There are some reporting, recordkeeping and other compliance 
    requirements under the order. The reporting and recordkeeping burdens 
    have been accepted by the handlers as necessary for compliance purposes 
    and for developing statistical data for maintenance of the program. The 
    forms require information which is readily available from handler 
    records and which can be provided without data processing equipment or 
    trained statistical staff. As with other marketing order programs, 
    reports and forms are periodically studied to reduce or eliminate 
    duplicate information collection burdens by industry and public sector 
    agencies. This interim final rule does not change those requirements. 
    In addition, the Department has not identified any relevant Federal 
    rules that duplicate, overlap or conflict with this regulation.
        Further, the Board's meeting was widely publicized throughout the 
    hazelnut industry and all interested persons were invited to attend the 
    meeting and participate in Board deliberations. Like all Board 
    meetings, the November 12, 1998, meeting was a public meeting and all 
    entities, both large and small, were able to express their views on 
    this issue. The Board itself is composed of 10 members, of which 4 are 
    handlers, 5 are producers, and one is a public member.
    
    [[Page 2425]]
    
        Any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of 
    this rule.
        After consideration of all relevant material presented, including 
    the Board's recommendation and other information, it is found that this 
    interim final rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate 
    the declared policy of the Act.
        Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined, upon 
    good cause, that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the 
    public interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule 
    into effect, and that good cause exists for not postponing the 
    effective date of this action until 30 days after publication in the 
    Federal Register because: (1) The 1998-99 marketing year began July 1, 
    1998, and the percentages established herein apply to all merchantable 
    hazelnuts handled from the beginning of the crop year; (2) handlers are 
    aware of this rule, which was recommended at an open Board meeting, and 
    need no additional time to comply with this rule; and (3) interested 
    persons are provided a 60-day comment period in which to respond, and 
    all comments timely received will be considered prior to finalization 
    of this action.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 982
    
        Filberts, Hazelnuts, Marketing agreements, Nuts, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Part 982 is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 982--HAZELNUTS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON
    
        1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 982 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
    
        2. Section 982.246 is added to read as follows:
    
        Note: This section will not be published in the annual Code of 
    Federal Regulations.
    
    
    Sec. 982.246  Free and restricted percentages--1998-99 marketing year.
    
        The final free and restricted percentages for merchantable 
    hazelnuts for the 1998-99 marketing year shall be 30 and 70 percent, 
    respectively.
    
        Dated: January 7, 1999.
    Larry B. Lace,
    Acting Deputy Administrator, Fruit and Vegetable Programs.
    [FR Doc. 99-841 Filed 1-13-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/15/1999
Published:
01/14/1999
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Interim final rule with request for comments.
Document Number:
99-841
Dates:
Effective January 15, 1999. Comments which are received by March 15, 1999, will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
Pages:
2422-2425 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. FV99-982-1 IFR
PDF File:
99-841.pdf
CFR: (1)
7 CFR 982.246