00-966. Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 65, Number 10 (Friday, January 14, 2000)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 2389-2390]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 00-966]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    [FRL-6249-9]
    
    
    Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
    EPA Comments
    
        Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
    Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
    Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
    Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
    Federal Activities at www.epa.gov/oeca/ofa. An explanation of the 
    ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was 
    published in FR dated April 09, 1999 (64 FR 17362).
    
    Draft EISs
    
        ERP No. D-NPS-J61102-00, EIS No. 990340, Winter Use Plan, 
    Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Parks and John D. Rockefeller Jr. 
    Memorial Parkway, Implementation, Fremont County, ID; Gallatin and Park 
    Counties, MT; and Park and Teton Counties, WY.
        Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections with the preferred 
    alternative because of adverse impacts from off-highway vehicle 
    emissions likely to result in noncompliance with air quality standards. 
    EPA recommends that the selected alternative assure compliance with air 
    quality standards. Rating EO2.
        ERP No. D-COE-K36129-CA, EIS No. 990367, San Timoteo Creek Reach 3B 
    Flood Control Project, Flood Protection, Construction, Operation and 
    Maintenance, San Bernardino County, CA.
        Summary: EPA expressed objections to the preferred project 
    alternative based on significant impacts to waters of the US, including 
    wetlands, and deficient analyses of impacts and mitigation measures 
    related to waters and biological resources. EPA also determined that 
    the DEIS's Preferred Alternative is not consistent with the Section 404 
    (B)(1) guidelines of the CWA. EPA recommended modification of the 
    alternatives in the FEIS. Rating EO2.
        ERP No. D-IBR-H39007-00, EIS No. 990375, Republican River Basin 
    Long-Term Water Supply Contract Renewals for Five Irrigation Districts, 
    Frenchman-Cambridge, Frenchman Valley and Bostwick Irrigation District 
    in Nebraska and Bostwick No. 2 and Almena Irrigation Districts in 
    Kansas, NB and KS.
        Summary: EPA raised significant issues regarding depletions of 
    water resources, species extripation, pending water quality standards, 
    and competing water interests. Rating EC2.
        ERP No. D-UAF-E11046-FL, EIS No. 990390, Tyndall Air Force Base, 
    Implementation, Proposed Conversion of Two F-15 Fight Squadrons to F-22 
    Fighter Squadron, FL.
        Summary: The conversion of two fighter squadrons of F-15 to F-22 
    aircraft at Tyndall AFB does not appear to pose significant and/or 
    long-term adverse environmental consequences. Rating LO.
        ERP No. D-AFS-G65074-TX, EIS No. 990395, Texas Blowdown 
    Reforestation Project, Implementation, National Forests and Grasslands 
    in Texas, Angeline and Sabine National Forests, San Augustine and 
    Shelby Counties, TX.
        Summary: EPA has no objection to the preferred action as described 
    in the Draft EIS. Rating LO.
        ERP No. D-HUD-K80040-CA, EIS No. 990403, City of Monterey Park 
    Project, Construction and Operation of the Monterey Park Towne Plaza, 
    North of the Pomona Freeway and west Paramount Boulevard, Los Angeles 
    County, CA.
        Summary: EPA expressed support for the proposed project to the 
    extent that it is consistent with and does not in any way hinder EPA's 
    ongoing and long term Superfund response actions at the Operating 
    Industries Inc. (Oil) Superfund Site. Rating LO.
        ERP No. D-DOE-K22004-CA, EIS No. 990410, National Ignition Facility 
    Project Specific Analysis, Construction and Operation at the Lawrence 
    Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA
        Summary: EPA expressed concern regarding clean-up levels for PCBs 
    and the relationships among various clean-up plans and requirements 
    under CERCLA. EPA requested clarification of these issues and that 
    additional information on the economic impacts be included in the final 
    EIS. Rating EC2.
        ERP No. D-FHW-K40240-CA, EIS No. 990411, CA-70 Upgrade in Sutter 
    and Yuba Counties, To a Four-Lane Expressway/Freeway, From South of 
    Striplin Road to South of McGowan Road Overcrossing, Funding and COE 
    Section 404 Permit, Sutter and Yuba Counties, CA
        Summary: EPA objections to Alternative 1 since it does not appear 
    to be the least environmentally damaging practicable alternative 
    pursuant to Clean Water Act section 404(b)(1) guidelines. EPA also 
    expressed concerns regarding Alternatives 2 and 3 due to impacts to 
    water and air quality, wetlands mitigation, and project air conformity. 
    Rating EO2.
        ERP No. D-TVA-E70001-TN, EIS No. 990420, Tim Ford Reservoir Land 
    Management and Disposition Plan, Implementation, Tim Ford Reservoir, 
    Franklin and Moore Counties, TN.
        Summary: EPA raised environmental concerns with the proposal based 
    on its features that allow for more development of undeveloped lands 
    than currently exists. Rating EC1.
        ERP No. D-FTA-K54023-CA, EIS No. 990433, Vasona Corridor Light Rail 
    Transit Project, Extension of Existing Light Rail Transit (LRT) in 
    portion of the Cities of San Jose, Campbell and Los Gatos, Santa Clara 
    County, CA.
        Summary: EPA expressed a lack of objections to the project proposal 
    but did suggest that the cumulative impacts section be expanded; that 
    the project proponent work with EPA in developing the final wetlands 
    mitigation plan; and that the project use recycled products in keeping 
    with RCRA requirements. Rating LO.
        ERP No. DS-UAF-A11074-00, EIS No. 990422, Evolved Expendable Launch 
    Vehicle Program, Updated Information, To Allow the Addition of Up to 
    Five Strap-On Solid Rocket Motors (SRM) to the Atlas V and Delta IV 
    Lift Vehicle, Launch Locations are Cape Canaveral Air Station, Brevard 
    County, FL and Vandenberg Air Force Base (AFB), Santa Barbara County, 
    CA
    
    [[Page 2390]]
    
        Summary: While EPA has no objection to the proposed action, some 
    technical/clarification items were provided. Rating LO.
    
    Final EISs
    
        ERP No. F-FAA-K51038-CA, EIS No. 990385, San Jose International 
    Airport Master Plan Update, Improvements include extension of Runway 
    12R/30L from 10,200 ft. to 11,000 ft; Airport Layout Plan, City of San 
    Jose, Santa Clara County, CA.
        Summary: EPA continues to have objections to the proposed action 
    since noise and pollution prevention issues were not fully disclosed 
    and mitigated.
        ERP No. F-AFS-J65217-UT, EIS No. 990412, Brighton Ski Resort Master 
    Development Plan Updated, Implementation, Wasatch-Cache National 
    Forest, Salt Lake City, UT.
        Summary: EPA expressed continued concerns with current snow storage 
    practices at the Brighton Ski Area base area and suggests exploration 
    less damaging alternatives. Also, because the bulldozing of snow and 
    associated contaminants from parking lots can be considered a point 
    source discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S., mitigation 
    solutions are needed.
        ERP No. F-FTA-L40210-WA, EIS No. 990416, Central Link Light Rail 
    Transit Project, (Sound Transit) Electric Rail System Construction and 
    Operation, Funding, COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Seattle, Sea Tac 
    and Tuckwila Cities, King County, WA.
        Summary: EPA continues to express concern regarding the commitment 
    to ensure that all mitigation measures are implemented. EPA recommended 
    that the commitment to mitigate be included in the Record of Decision.
        ERP No. F-USA-G11036-AR, EIS No. 990419, Fort Chaffee Disposal and 
    Reuse, Implementation, Ozark Mountains, Sebastian, Crawford, Franklin, 
    Smith, Barling, and Greenwood Counties, AR.
        Summary: The Final EIS fully responded to EPA's comments offered on 
    the Draft Statement. EPA has no further comments to offer.
        ERP No. F-FRC-F03006-00, EIS No. 990428, Independence Pipeline and 
    Market Link Expansion Projects, Construction and Operation, Interstate 
    National Gas Pipeline, (Docket Nos. CP97-315-001, CP97-319-000, CP98-
    200-000 and CP-540-000, NPDES and COE Section 404 Permits, IL, IN, MI, 
    OH, PA, and NJ.
        Summary: EPA continues to have concerns that the EIS: (1) does not 
    substantiate the Purpose and Need for the proposal, and (2) does not 
    recommend that the projects' proponents develop and implement upland 
    forest mitigation plans to mitigate for the entire 1,310.7 acres of 
    upland forest that would be permanently lost if this project is 
    constructed.
        ERP No. F-DOE-A09828-00, EIS No. 990434, Surplus Plutonium 
    Disposition (DOE/EIS-0283) for Siting, Construction and Operation of 
    Three Facilities for Plutonium Disposition, Possible Sites: Hanford, 
    Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory, Pantex Plant 
    and Savannah River, CA, ID, NM, SC, TX, and WA.
        Summary: EPA has no objection to the action as proposed.
        ERP No. F-NPS-L61222-WA, EIS No. 990435, Lake Roosevelt National 
    Recreation Area, General Management Plan, Implementation, Ferry, Grant, 
    Lincoln, Okanogan, and Steven Counties, WA.
        Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency. 
    ERP No. F-COE-E39047-AL, EIS No. 990439, Jackson Port Project, Proposal 
    for the Public Port Facilities on the Tombigbee River, City of Jackson, 
    Clark County, AL.
        Summary: EPA continues to have significant objections to the 
    planned phased development which will convert important bottomland 
    hardwood wetlands habitat into commercial property.
        ERP No. F-FAA-E51046-NC, EIS No. 990448, Charlotte/Douglas 
    International Airport Construction and Operation, New Runway 17/35, 
    Future 18L/36R Associated Taxiway Improvements, Master Plan 
    Development, Airport Layout Plan (ALP) Approval, and COE Section 404 
    Permit Issuance, Mecklenburg County, NC.
        Summary: EPA continues to be concerned with noise increases 
    relative to residences in the airport area due to the proposed 
    expansion and requested consideration of further mitigation.
        ERP No. F-NPS-L65328-WA, EIS No. 990456, Vancouver National 
    Historic Reserve Cooperative Management Plan, Preservation, Education 
    and Public Use, Implementation, Clark County, WA.
        Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
    
        Dated: January 10, 2000.
    B. Katherine Biggs,
    Associate Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
    Activities.
    [FR Doc. 00-966 Filed 1-13-00; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/14/2000
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
00-966
Pages:
2389-2390 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-6249-9
PDF File:
00-966.pdf