99-910. Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company (RHC) Model R22 Helicopters  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 2558-2559]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-910]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-SW-79-AD; Amendment 39-10991; AD 99-02-02]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company (RHC) Model 
    R22 Helicopters
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive 
    (AD), applicable to RHC Model R22 helicopters, that currently requires 
    initial and repetitive inspections of the forward flexplate (flexplate) 
    at specified time intervals. This amendment also supersedes an existing 
    priority letter AD that requires, within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) 
    or 15 calendar days, whichever occurs first, replacing the flexplate 
    with an airworthy flexplate. This amendment requires the same 
    replacement as the priority letter AD. This amendment is prompted by an 
    accident in which the flexplate failed, causing loss of main rotor 
    drive and rupture of the fuel tank. The actions specified by this AD 
    are intended to prevent failure of the flexplate, which could result in 
    failure of the main rotor drive system and subsequent loss of control 
    of the helicopter.
    
    DATES: Effective February 1, 1999.
        Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or 
    before March 16, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-SW-79-AD, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, 
    Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Bumann, Aerospace Engineer, 
    FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, Propulsion Branch, 3960 
    Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712, telephone (562) 627-5265, 
    fax (817) 627-5210.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA issued priority letter AD 94-11-01 
    on May 18, 1994 and AD 95-06-07 (60 FR 14619, March 20, 1995) on March 
    10, 1995. AD 95-06-07 superseded priority letter AD 94-11-01. Both AD's 
    were prompted by three accidents involving failure of the flexplate. 
    Both AD's also required an initial dye-penetrant inspection and 
    repetitive visual inspections of the flexplate at intervals not to 
    exceed 50 hours TIS, after accumulating 500 hours TIS or 2 years 
    service life, whichever occurred first. AD 95-06-07 also exempted 
    flexplate, part number (P/N) A947-1 E, and subsequent FAA-approved 
    revisions, from the requirements of that AD, and provided that 
    installation of flexplate, P/N A947-1 E or a subsequent FAA-approved 
    revision to that P/N, constituted a terminating action for the 
    requirements of that AD.
        After the issuance of AD 95-06-07, another accident occurred in 
    which the flexplate, P/N A947-1, failed, causing loss of the main rotor 
    drive and rupture of the fuel tank. Prompted by that accident, the FAA 
    determined that the repetitive inspections required by AD 95-06-07 did 
    not correct the unsafe condition. Therefore, the FAA issued priority 
    letter AD 98-14-08 on June 25, 1998, which specifies procedures for 
    replacing flexplate, P/N A193-1 or P/N A947-1 A through D, with 
    flexplate, P/N A947-1 E or F. Also, the FAA intended that Priority 
    Letter AD 98-14-08 (Docket 98-SW-33-AD) supersede AD 95-06-07 (Docket 
    94-SW-22-AD), but did not state that in Priority Letter AD 98-14-08. To 
    eliminate any confusion, this AD supersedes Priority Letter AD 98-14-08 
    (Docket 98-SW-30-AD), and AD 95-06-07, Amendment 39-9177 (Docket 94-SW-
    22-AD). This action is intended to prevent failure of the flexplate, 
    which could result in failure of the main rotor drive system and 
    subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other RHC Model R22 helicopters of the same type 
    design, this AD supersedes AD 95-06-07 and priority letter AD 98-14-08 
    to prevent failure of the flexplate, which could result in failure of 
    the main rotor drive system and subsequent loss of control of the 
    helicopter. The short compliance time involved is required because the 
    previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the 
    controllability of the helicopter. Therefore, replacing the flexplate 
    with an airworthy flexplate is required within 25 hours TIS or 15 
    calendar days, whichever occurs first, and this AD must be issued 
    immediately.
        Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of 
    this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior 
    public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for 
    making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
        The FAA estimates that 100 helicopters will be affected by this AD, 
    that it will take approximately 1.5 work hours to replace the 
    flexplate, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. 
    Required parts will cost approximately $536 per helicopter. Based on 
    these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is 
    estimated to be $62,600.
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves 
    requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by 
    notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on 
    this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by 
    submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. 
    Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted 
    in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments will 
    be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments 
    received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and 
    suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the 
    AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be 
    needed.
    
    [[Page 2559]]
    
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might 
    suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be 
    available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the 
    Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that 
    summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this 
    AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 98-SW-79-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency 
    regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe 
    condition in aircraft, and that it is not a ``significant regulatory 
    action'' under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further 
    that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory 
    Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is 
    determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be 
    significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final 
    regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. 
    A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the 
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-9177 (60 FR 
    14619, March 20, 1995), and by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD), Amendment 39-10991, to read as follows:
    
    AD 99-02-02  Robinson Helicopter Company: Amendment 39-10991. Docket 
    No. 98-SW-79-AD. Supersedes AD 95-06-07, Amendment 39-9177, Docket 
    No. 94-SW-22-AD, and Priority Letter AD 98-14-08, Docket No. 98-SW-
    30-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model R22 helicopters, with forward flexplate 
    (flexplate), part number (P/N) A947-1, A through D, or P/N A193-1, 
    installed, certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority 
    provided in paragraph (b) to request approval from the FAA. This 
    approval may address either no action, if the current configuration 
    eliminates the unsafe condition, or different actions necessary to 
    address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request 
    should include an assessment of the effect of the changed 
    configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no 
    case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair 
    remove any helicopter from the applicability of this AD.
    
        Compliance: Required within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) or 15 
    calendar days, whichever occurs first, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent failure of the flexplate, which could result in 
    failure of the main rotor drive system and subsequent loss of 
    control of the helicopter, accomplish the following:
        (a) Remove the flexplate and replace it with an airworthy 
    flexplate, P/N A947-1 E or F, in accordance with following:
        (1) With the clutch disengaged, support the forward end of the 
    clutch shaft, P/N A166-1, and remove the forward flexplate, P/N 
    A947-1 or A193-1, and the intermediate flexplate, P/N A947-2 or P/N 
    A193-2. Record any shim locations for reinstallation.
        (2) Install a zero TIS forward flexplate, P/N A947-1 E or F, and 
    any shims that were noted. Use washers, P/N AN960-516 or AN960-516L, 
    under the nut so that 2-4 threads are exposed. Torque the fasteners.
        (3) Inspect the sheave alignment.
        (4) Inspect the clutch shaft, P/N A166-1, angle.
        (5) Reinstall the intermediate flexplate and shim.
    
        Note 2: Robinson R22 Maintenance Manual, Sections 1.320, 7.230, 
    7.240, and 7.330 pertain to paragraphs (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), and 
    (a)(5) of this AD, respectively.
    
        Note 3: Robinson Helicopter Company R22 Service Bulletin SB-75, 
    dated November 22, 1994, pertains to the subject of this AD.
    
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification 
    Office, FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then 
    send it to the Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
        Note 4: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) This amendment becomes effective on February 1, 1999.
    
        Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 6, 1999.
    Henry A. Armstrong,
    Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-910 Filed 1-14-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/1/1999
Published:
01/15/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule; request for comments.
Document Number:
99-910
Dates:
Effective February 1, 1999.
Pages:
2558-2559 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-SW-79-AD, Amendment 39-10991, AD 99-02-02
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-910.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13