[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 11 (Thursday, January 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2518-2541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1053]
[[Page 2517]]
_______________________________________________________________________
Part III
Department of Education
_______________________________________________________________________
Bilingual Education--Systemwide Improvement Grants; Applications
Invitation, FY 1997; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 11 / Thursday, January 16, 1997 /
Notices
[[Page 2518]]
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No.: 84.291R]
Bilingual Education--Systemwide Improvement Grants; Notice
Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 1997
Note to Applicants: This notice is a complete application package.
Together with the statute authorizing the program and applicable
regulations governing the program, including the Education Department
General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR), this notice contains all of
the information, application forms, and instructions needed to apply
for an award under this program.
Purpose of Program: This program provides grants to implement
districtwide bilingual education programs or special alternative
instructional programs to improve, reform, and upgrade relevant
programs and operations, within an entire local educational agency
(LEA), that serve a significant number of limited English proficient
(LEP) children and youth in one or more LEAs with significant
concentrations of these children and youth.
Eligible Applicants: (1) One or more LEAs; or (2) one or more LEAs
in collaboration with an institution of higher education, community-
based organizations, other LEAs, or a State educational agency.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: April 4, 1997.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: June 3, 1997.
Available Funds: $20 million.
Estimated Range of Awards: $350,000-$650,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 40.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: 60 months.
Applicable Regulations
The Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)
in 34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, and 86.
Description of Program
The statutory authorization for this program, and the application
requirements that apply to this competition, are set out in sections
7115 and 7116 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as
amended by the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-
382, enacted October 20, 1994 (the Act) (20 U.S.C. 7425 and 7426)).
Grants under this program may be used during the first 12 months
exclusively for activities preparatory to the delivery of services.
Grants may be used to improve the education of limited English
proficient students and their families by reviewing, restructuring, and
upgrading--
(A) Educational goals, curriculum guidelines and content, standards
and assessments;
(B) Personnel policies and practices including recruitment,
certification, staff development, and assignment;
(C) Student grade-promotion and graduation requirements;
(D) Student assignment policies and practices;
(E) Family education programs and parent outreach and training
activities designed to assist parents to become active participants in
the education of their children;
(F) The instructional program for limited English proficient
students by identifying, acquiring and upgrading curriculum,
instructional materials, educational software and assessment procedures
and, if appropriate, applying educational technology;
(G) Tutorials and academic or career counseling for children and
youth of limited-English proficiency; and
(H) Such other activities, related to the purposes of this part, as
the Secretary may approve.
Priorities
Absolute Priority
The priority in the notice of final priority for this program, as
published in the Federal Register on October 30, 1995 (60 FR 55246-
55247) and repeated below, applies to this competition.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3) and section 7115(a) of the Act, the
Secretary gives an absolute preference to applications that meet the
following priority. The Secretary funds under this competition only
applications that meet this absolute priority:
Projects that serve only LEAs in which the number of LEP students,
in each LEA served, is at least 1,000 or at least 25 percent of the
total student enrollment.
Invitational Priority
Within the absolute priority specified in this notice, the
Secretary is particularly interested in applications that meet the
invitational priority in the next paragraph. However, an application
that meets this invitational priority does not receive competitive or
absolute preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Applicants that consider the Department of Education Professional
Development Principles in planning and designing a Systemwide
Improvement Grant project.
Those principles call for educator professional development that
focuses on teachers as central to student learning, yet includes all
other members of the school community; focuses on individual,
collegial, and organizational improvement; respects and nurtures the
intellectual and leadership capacity of teachers, principals, and
others in the school community; reflects best available research and
practice in teaching, learning, and leadership; enables teachers to
develop further expertise in subject content, teaching strategies, uses
of technologies, and other essential elements in teaching to high
standards; promotes continuous inquiry and improvement embedded in the
daily life of schools; is planned collaboratively by those who will
participate in and facilitate that development; requires substantial
time and other resources; is driven by a coherent long-term plan; is
evaluated ultimately on the basis of its impact on teacher
effectiveness and student learning; and uses this assessment to guide
subsequent professional development efforts.
Selection Criteria
(a)(1) The Secretary uses the following provisions in sections 7115
and 7116 of the Act and 34 CFR 75.210 as selection criteria to evaluate
applications for new grants under this competition.
(2) The maximum score for all of these criteria is 100 points.
(3) The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in
parentheses.
(b) The criteria--(1) Meeting the purposes of the authorizing
statute. (15 points) The Secretary reviews each application to
determine how well the project is designed to implement districtwide
bilingual education programs or special alternative instruction
programs to improve, reform, and upgrade relevant programs and
operations, within an entire local educational agency, that serve a
significant number of children and youth of limited English proficiency
in local educational agencies with significant concentrations of such
children and youth.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7425(a))
(2) Extent of need for the project. (15 points) The Secretary
reviews each application to determine the extent to which the project
meets specific needs recognized in the statute that authorizes the
program, including consideration of--
[[Page 2519]]
(i) Data on the number of children and youth of limited-English
proficiency in the school district to be served;
(ii) The characteristics of such children and youth, such as
language spoken, dropout rates, proficiency in English and the native
language, academic standing in relation to the English-proficient peers
of those children and youth, and, where applicable, the recency of
immigration;
(iii) The needs addressed by the project;
(iv) How the applicant identified those needs;
(v) How those needs will be met by the project; and
(vi) The benefits to be gained by meeting those needs.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(g)(1)(A); 34 C.F.R. 75.210(b)(2))
(3) Plan of operation. (35 points) The Secretary reviews each
application to determine how well the project meets the following
requirements:
(i) How the program is to be implemented and its design--
(A) Relate to the linguistic and academic needs of the children and
youth of limited-English proficiency to be served;
(B) Are coordinated with other programs under this Act, the Goals
2000: Educate America Act and other Acts, as appropriate in accordance
with section 14306 of the Act;
(C) Involve the parents of the children and youth of limited-
English proficiency to be served;
(D) Ensure accountability in achieving high academic standards; and
(E) Promote coordination of services for the children and youth of
limited-English proficiency to be served and their families.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(g)(1)(B))
(ii) How, if appropriate, the applicant proposes collaborative
activities with institutions of higher education, community-based
organizations, local or State educational agencies, private schools,
nonprofit organizations, or businesses in carrying out the proposed
program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(g)(1)(C))
(iii)(A) What current services the applicant provides to children
and youth of limited-English proficiency;
(B) What services children and youth of limited-English proficiency
will receive under the grant that such children or youth will not
otherwise receive;
(C) How funds received will be integrated with all other Federal,
State, local, and private resources that may be used to serve children
and youth of limited-English proficiency;
(D) Specific achievement and school retention goals for the
children and youth to be served by the proposed program and how
progress toward achieving such goals will be measured; and
(E) Current family education programs if applicable.
(iv) How the applicant's proposed project will be integrated with
the applicant's overall educational program.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(g)(2)(B)(i))
(v) How training for personnel participating in or preparing to
participate in the program will assist those personnel in meeting State
and local certification requirements.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(i)(5))
(4) Proficiency in English and another language. (5 points) The
Secretary reviews each application to determine the extent to which the
project will provide for the development of bilingual proficiency both
in English and another language for all participating students.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(i)(1))
(5) Quality of key personnel. (8 points) The Secretary reviews each
application to determine how well the project meets the following
requirements:
(i) How the applicant will employ teachers in the proposed program
that, individually or in combination, are proficient in English,
including written, as well as oral, communication skills.
(ii) How the project will use qualified personnel, including
personnel who are proficient in the language or languages used in
instruction.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(g)(1)(E) and (h)(1))
(6) Budget and cost effectiveness. (5 points) The Secretary reviews
each application to determine the extent to which--
(i) The budget is adequate to support the project; and
(ii) Costs are reasonable in relation to the objectives of the
project.
(34 CFR 75.210(b)(5))
(7) Evaluation plan. (13 points) The Secretary reviews each
application to determine how well the project's evaluation will meet
the following requirements. The evaluation must include--
(i) How students are achieving the State student performance
standards, if any, including data comparing children and youth of
limited-English proficiency with nonlimited English proficient children
and youth with regard to school retention, academic achievement, and
gains in English (and, where applicable, native language) proficiency;
(ii) Program implementation indicators that provide information for
informing and improving program management and effectiveness, including
data on appropriateness of curriculum in relationship to grade and
course requirements, appropriateness of program management,
appropriateness of the program's staff professional development, and
appropriateness of the language of instruction; and
(iii) Program context indicators that describe the relationship of
the activities funded under the grant to the overall school program and
other Federal, State, or local programs serving children and youth of
limited-English proficiency.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7433)
(8) Adequacy of resources. (4 points) The Secretary reviews each
application to determine how well the project meets the following
requirements:
(i) Student evaluation and assistance procedures must be valid,
reliable, and fair for limited-English proficient students.
(ii) Limited-English proficient students who are disabled must be
identified and served in accordance with the requirements of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
(iii) The project must contribute toward building the capacity of
the applicant to provide a program on a regular basis, similar to that
proposed for assistance, which will be of sufficient size, scope, and
quality to promise significant improvement in the education of students
of limited-English proficiency, and that the applicant will have the
resources and commitment to continue the program when assistance is
reduced or no longer available.
(iv) The project must provide for utilization of the State and
national dissemination sources for program design and in dissemination
of results and products.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7426(h)(3), (5), and (6))
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs
This program is subject to the requirements of Executive Order
12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs) and the
regulations in 34 CFR Part 79.
The objective of the Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and to strengthen federalism by relying
on State and local processes for State and local government
coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.
Applicants must contact the appropriate State Single Point of
Contact to find out about, and to comply
[[Page 2520]]
with, the State's process under Executive order 12372. Applicants
proposing to perform activities in more than one State should
immediately contact the Single Point of Contact for each of those
States and follow the procedure established in each State under the
Executive order. If you want to know the name and address of any State
Single Point of Contact, see the list published in the Federal Register
on August 20, 1996 (61 FR 43133 through 43135).
In States that have not established a process or chosen a program
for review, State, areawide, regional, and local entities may submit
comments directly to the Department.
Any State Process Recommendation and other comments submitted by a
State Single Point of Contact and any comments from State, areawide,
regional, and local entities must be mailed or hand-delivered by the
date indicated in this notice to the following address: The Secretary,
E.O. 12372--CFDA# 84.291R, U.S. Department of Education, Room 6213, 600
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, D.C. 20202-0124.
Proof of mailing will be determined on the same basis as
applications (see 34 CFR 75.102). Recommendations or comments may be
hand-delivered until 4:30 p.m. (Washington, D.C. time) on the date
indicated in this notice.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ABOVE ADDRESS IS NOT THE SAME ADDRESS AS THE
ONE TO WHICH THE APPLICANT SUBMITS ITS COMPLETED APPLICATION. DO NOT
SEND APPLICATIONS TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS. INSTRUCTIONS FOR TRANSMITTAL OF
APPLICATIONS:
(a) If an applicant wants to apply for a grant, the applicant shall
--
(1) Mail the original and specified copies of the application on or
before the deadline date to:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA# 84.291R), Washington, D.C. 20202-4725
or
(2) Hand-deliver the original and specified copies of the
application by 4:30 p.m. (Washington, D.C. time) on or before the
deadline date to:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA# 84.291R), Room #3633, Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D
Streets, SW., Washington, D.C.
(b) An applicant must show one of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary.
(c) If an application is mailed through the U.S. Postal Service,
the Secretary does not accept either of the following as proof of
mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a
dated postmark. Before relying on this method, an applicant should
check with its local post office.
(2) The Application Control Center will mail a Grant Application
Receipt Acknowledgment to each applicant. If an applicant fails to
receive the notification of application receipt within 15 days from
the date of mailing the application, the applicant should call the
U.S. Department of Education Application Control Center at (202)
708-9495.
(3) The applicant must indicate on the envelope and--if not
provided by the Department--in Item 10 of the Application for
Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) the CFDA number and suffix
letter, if any, of the competition under which the application is
being submitted.
Application Instructions and Forms
The appendix to this application contains the following forms and
instructions, plus a statement regarding estimated public reporting
burden, various assurances, a notice to applicants regarding compliance
with section 427 of the General Education Provisions Act,
certifications, checklist for applicants, and required documentation:
a. Application for Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424 (Rev. 4-
88)) and instructions.
b. Budget Information--Non-Construction Programs (ED Form No. 524)
and instructions.
c. Application Narrative.
d. Estimated Public Reporting Burden.
e. Group Application Certification.
f. Student Data.
g. Project Documentation.
h. Program Assurances.
i. Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (Standard Form 424B) and
instructions.
j. Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and
Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED
80-0013) and instructions.
k. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED 80-0014, 9/90)
and instructions.
(Note: This form is intended for the use of grantees and should
not be transmitted to the Department.)
l. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (Standard Form LLL) (if
applicable) and instructions. The document has been marked to reflect
statutory changes. See the notice published by the Office of Management
and Budget at 61 FR 1413 (January 19, 1996).
m. Notice to All Applicants.
An applicant may submit information on a photostatic copy of the
application and budget forms, the assurances, and the certifications.
However, the application form, the assurances, and the certifications
must each have an original signature. All applicants must submit ONE
original signed application and TWO copies of the application. The
Secretary also requests applicants to send a THIRD copy of the
application to assist in the Department's review. Please mark each
application as ``original'' or ``copy''. No grant may be awarded unless
a completed application has been received.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cecile Kreins, James Lockhart, or
Harry Logel, U.S. Department of Education, 600 Independence Avenue,
SW., Room 5090, Switzer Building, Washington, D.C. 20202-6510.
Telephone: Cecile Kreins (202) 205-5568, James Lockhart (202) 205-5426,
Harry Logel (202) 205-5530). Individuals who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay
Service(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
time, Monday through Friday.
Information about the Department's funding opportunities, including
copies of application notices for discretionary grant competitions, can
be viewed on the Department's electronic bulletin board (ED Board),
telephone (202) 260-9950; on the Internet Gopher Server (at gopher://
gcs.ed.gov); or on the World Wide Web (at http://gcs.ed.gov). However,
the official application notice for a discretionary grant competition
is the notice published in the Federal Register. Note: Some of the
forms in the Appendix to this notice may not be available from these
electronic sources.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7425.
Dated: January 7, 1997.
Delia Pompa,
Director, Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs.
Instructions for Estimated Public Reporting Burden
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
valid
[[Page 2521]]
OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information
collection is OMB No. 1885-0528, Exp. Date: 4/30/98. The time required
to complete this information collection is estimated to average 160
hours per response, including the time to review instructions, search
existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and
review the information collection. If you have any comments concerning
the accuracy of the time estimate or suggestions for improving this
form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
20202-4651. If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of
your individual submission of this form, write directly to: Office of
Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs, U.S. Department of
Education, 600 Independence Ave., S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202-6510.
APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
Mandatory Page Limit for the Application Narrative
The narrative portion of the application must not exceed 75 pages.
These pages must be doubled-spaced and printed on one side only. A
legible font size and adequate margins should be used. The narrative
section must be paginated and should include a one-page abstract. The
page limit applies to: (1) the abstract, (2) the proposal narrative,
(3) charts, graphs, tables, and graphics, (4) position descriptions
(and resumes,if included), and (5) any appendices. The page limit does
not apply to: application forms and other forms furnished by the
Department, assurances and attachments to those forms, and the table of
contents (items 1-13 in the Checklist for Applicants).
Application Narrative
The narrative section should begin with an abstract that includes a
short description of the population to be served by the project,
project objectives, and planned project activities. The narrative
should address fully all aspects of the selection criteria in the order
listed and should give detailed information regarding each criterion.
Do not simply paraphrase the criteria. Do not send letters of support
unless they are critical to the instructional design of the project. Do
not send curriculum vitae for key personnel; submit position
descriptions instead. APPLICATIONS WITH A NARRATIVE SECTION THAT
EXCEEDS THE PAGE LIMIT WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR FUNDING. THE
APPLICATION NARRATIVE MUST BE PAGINATED.
Table of Contents
The application should include a table of contents listing the
sections in the order required.
Final Application Preparation
Use the checklist included in this application to verify that your
application is complete. Prepare an original copy with an original
signature. Prepare three additional copies. Do not bind in notebooks,
elaborate bindings, or covers. The application package must be mailed
or hand-delivered to the address specified in this notice and
postmarked by the deadline date.
Notice to All Applicants
Thank you for your interest in this program. The purpose of this
enclosure is to inform you about a new provision in the Department of
Education's General Education Provisions Act (GEPA) that applies to
applicants for new grant awards under Department programs. This
provision is section 427 of GEPA, enacted as part of the Improving
America's Schools Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-382).
To Whom Does This Provision Apply?
Section 427 of GEPA affects applicants for new discretionary grant
awards under this program. ALL APPLICANTS FOR NEW AWARDS MUST INCLUDE
INFORMATION IN THEIR APPLICATIONS TO ADDRESS THIS NEW PROVISION IN
ORDER TO RECEIVE FUNDING UNDER THIS PROGRAM.
What Does This Provision Require?
Section 427 requires each applicant for funds (other than an
individual person) to include in its application a description of the
steps the applicant proposes to take to ensure equitable access to, and
participation in, its federally-assisted program for students,
teachers, and other program beneficiaries with special needs.
This section allows applicants discretion in developing the
required description. The statute highlights six types of barriers that
can impede equitable access or participation that you may address:
gender, race, national origin, color, disability, or age. Based on
local circumstances, you can determine whether these or other barriers
may prevent your students, teachers, etc. from equitable access or
participation. Your description need not be lengthy; you may provide a
clear and succinct description of how you plan to address those
barriers that are applicable to your circumstances. In addition, the
information may be provided in a single narrative, or, if appropriate,
may be discussed in connection with related topics in the application.
Section 427 is not intended to duplicate the requirements of civil
rights statutes, but rather to ensure that, in designing their
projects, applicants for Federal funds address equity concerns that may
affect the ability of certain potential beneficiaries to fully
participate in the project and to achieve to high standards. Consistent
with program requirements and its approved application, an applicant
may use the Federal funds awarded to it to eliminate barriers it
identifies.
What are Examples of How an Applicant Might Satisfy the Requirement of
This Provision?
The following examples may help illustrate how an applicant may
comply with section 427.
(1) An applicant that proposes to carry out an adult literacy
project serving, among others, adults with limited English proficiency,
might describe in its application how it intends to distribute a
brochure about the proposed project to such potential participants in
their native language.
(2) An applicant that proposes to develop instructional materials
for classroom use might describe how it will make the materials
available on audio tape or in braille for students who are blind.
(3) An applicant that proposes to carry out a model science program
for secondary students and is concerned that girls may be less likely
than boys to enroll in the course, might indicate how it tends to
conduct ``outreach'' efforts to girls, to encourage their enrollment.
We recognize that many applicants may already be implementing
effective steps to ensure equity of access and participation in their
grant programs, and we appreciate your cooperation in responding to the
requirements of this provision.
Estimated Burden Statement
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this
information collection is 1801-0004 (Exp. 8/31/98). The time required
to complete this information collection is estimated to vary from 1 to
3 hours per response, with an average of 1.5 hours, including the time
to review instructions, search existing data resources, gather and
maintain the data needed, and complete and review the information
collection. If you have any comments concerning the
[[Page 2522]]
accuracy of the time estimate(s) or suggestions for improving this
form, please write to: U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
20202-4651.
Checklist for Applicants
Systemwide Improvement Grants
The following forms and other items must be included in the
application and organized in the same manner listed below:
1. Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424)
2. Group Application Certification (if applicable)
3. Budget Information (ED Form No. 524)
4. Itemized Budget for each year
5. Student Data
6. Project Documentation:
Transmittal Letter to SEA
Documentation of Consultation with Nonprofit Private School
Officials, if applicable
Box checked in Section C of this form
7. Program Assurances
8. Notice to All Applicants (OMB No. 1801-0004)
9. Assurances--Non-Construction Programs (SF 424B)
10. Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other
Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements (ED 80-
0013)
11. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and
Voluntary Exclusion--Lower Tier Covered Transactions (ED 80-0014)
12. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL)
13. Table of Contents
14. Application Narrative, including Abstract (not to exceed 75 pages)
15. One Original and Three Copies of the Application to be transmitted
to the Department at the address specified in this notice.
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
[[Page 2523]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.000
[[Page 2524]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.001
[[Page 2525]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.002
[[Page 2526]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.003
[[Page 2527]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.004
[[Page 2528]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.005
[[Page 2529]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.006
[[Page 2530]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.007
[[Page 2531]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.008
[[Page 2532]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.009
[[Page 2533]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.010
[[Page 2534]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.011
[[Page 2535]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.012
[[Page 2536]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.013
[[Page 2537]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.014
[[Page 2538]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.015
[[Page 2539]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.016
[[Page 2540]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.017
[[Page 2541]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16JA97.018
[FR Doc. 97-1053 Filed 1-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-C
