[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2593-2597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-1081]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[IN63-1a; FRL-5663-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Indiana
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On November 21, 1995, and February 14, 1996, the State of
Indiana submitted rules for the control of volatile organic liquid
(VOL) storage operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties as
a requested State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. This rule is part
of the State's 15 percent (%) Rate of Progress (ROP) plan to control
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) emissions in Clark and Floyd Counties,
and is included in the VOC contingency plan for Lake and Porter
Counties. In addition, this rule is intended to satisfy Clean Air Act
(Act) requirements to adopt VOC Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT) rules for non-Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) sources in
Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties. Emissions of VOC react with
nitrogen oxides in sunlight to form ground-level ozone, commonly known
as smog. Exposure to high ozone concentrations causes respiratory
irritation, especially to children, seniors, and people with asthma and
other respiratory problems. Indiana expects that the control measures
specified in this VOL storage SIP will reduce VOC emissions by 2,620
pounds per day (lbs/day) in Lake and Porter Counties and 142 lbs/day in
Clark and Floyd Counties. In this action, EPA is approving Indiana's
rule as a direct final action; the rationale for this approval is set
forth below. Elsewhere in this Federal Register, EPA is proposing
approval and soliciting comment on this direct final action; if adverse
comments are received, EPA will withdraw the direct final and address
the comments received in a new final rule. Unless this direct final is
withdrawn, no further rulemaking will occur on this requested SIP
revision.
DATES: This final rule is effective March 18, 1997 unless adverse
comments are received by February 18, 1997. If the effective date is
delayed, timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Written comments can be mailed to:
J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
[[Page 2594]]
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604.
Copies of the SIP revision request are available for inspection at the
following address: (It is recommended that you telephone Mark J.
Palermo at (312) 886-6082, before visiting the Region 5 office.)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation
Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois, 60604.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Palermo, Air Programs Branch
(AR-18J) (312) 886-6082.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 182(b)(1) of the Act requires all moderate and above ozone
nonattainment areas to achieve a 15% reduction of 1990 emissions of VOC
by November 15, 1996. In Indiana, Lake and Porter Counties are
classified as ``severe'' nonattainment for ozone, while Clark and Floyd
Counties are classified as ``moderate'' nonattainment. As such, these
counties are subject to the 15% ROP requirement.
The Act specifies under section 182(b)(1)(C) that the 15% emission
reduction claimed under the ROP plan must be achieved through the
implementation of control measures through revisions to the SIP, the
promulgation of federal rules, or the issuance of permits under Title V
of the Act, by November 15, 1996. Control measures implemented before
November 15, 1990, are precluded from counting toward the 15%
reduction.
In addition, section 172(c)(9) requires moderate and above areas to
adopt contingency measures by November 15, 1993. The General Preamble
for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of
1990 (April 28, 1992, 57 FR at 18070), states that the contingency
measures generally must provide reductions of 3% from the 1990 base-
year inventory. While all contingency measures must be fully adopted
rules or measures, the State can use these measures in two different
ways. First, the State can use its discretion to implement a measure it
wants before 1996. Alternatively, the State may decide not to implement
a measure until the area has failed to either meet the 15% ROP
requirement or attain the national ambient air quality standards. In
that situation, the reductions must be achieved in the year following
that in which the failure has been identified by the State.
Besides ROP and contingency plan requirements, section 182(b)(2) of
the Act requires States to adopt RACT rules for all areas designated
nonattainment for ozone and classified as moderate or above.1
There are three parts to the section 182(b)(2) RACT requirement: (1)
RACT for sources covered by an existing CTG--i.e., a CTG issued prior
to the enactment of the amended Act of 1990; (2) RACT for sources
covered by a post-enactment CTG; and (3) all major sources not covered
by a CTG.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A definition of RACT is cited in a General Preamble-
Supplement on CTGs, published at 44 FR at 53761 (September 17,
1979). RACT is defined as the lowest emission limitation that a
particular source is capable of meeting by the application of
control technology that is reasonably available, considering
technological and economic feasibility.
\2\ The EPA publishes CTGs in order to assist the States in
determining RACT. The CTGs provide information on available air
pollution control techniques and provide recommendations on what the
EPA considers the ``presumptive norm'' for RACT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 183 of the amended Act requires EPA to issue post-enactment
CTGs for thirteen source categories. CTGs were published by this date
for four source categories--Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturing
Industry (SOCMI) Reactors, SOCMI Distillation, Wood Furniture Coating,
and Shipbuilding and Ship Repair Coating; however, the CTGs for the
remaining source categories have not been completed. To address State
requirements regarding post-enactment CTG source categories for which a
CTG has not yet been published, the EPA created a CTG document as
Appendix E to the General Preamble. In Appendix E, EPA interpreted the
Act to allow a State to submit a non-CTG rule by November 15, 1992, or
to defer submittal of a RACT rule for sources that the State
anticipated would be covered by a post-enactment CTG, based on the list
of CTGs EPA expected to issue to meet the requirement in section 183 of
the Act. One of the expected CTGs included on this list was to cover
VOL storage tanks. Appendix E states that if EPA fails to issue CTGs
for any of the post-enactment CTG source categories by November 15,
1993, the responsibility shifts to the State to submit a non-CTG RACT
rule for those source categories.
In October 1993, EPA issued a draft CTG for VOL storage tanks.
However, EPA decided not to finalize the CTG and, instead, issued in
January 1994, a document entitled ``Alternative Control Techniques
(ACT) Document: Volatile Organic Liquid Storage in Floating and Fixed
Roof Tanks'', to assist states in developing rules for controlling
emissions from VOL storage. In addition, EPA has adopted a New Source
Performance Standard (NSPS) for VOL storage operations in 40 CFR 60,
subpart Kb, which contains the same level of control identified in the
draft CTG and ACT. Both the draft CTG and the ACT contain a draft model
rule for use by the States in developing the SIP revisions.
To comply with 15% ROP plan, contingency measure, and non-CTG RACT
requirements, Indiana has submitted, as a requested revision to the
SIP, Rule 326 IAC 8-9 for the control of VOL storage operations in
Lake, Porter, Clark, and Floyd Counties. The rule is included as a
control measure in the 15% ROP plan for Clark and Floyd Counties and is
included as a contingency measure for Lake and Porter Counties'
contingency plan. (Rulemaking on the overall Clark and Floyd Counties
15% ROP plan and Lake and Porter Counties contingency plan SIP
revisions will be taken in a subsequent Federal Register action).
On May 3, 1995, the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board adopted the
VOL storage rule. Public hearings on the rule were held on March 1,
1995, and May 3, 1995, in Indianapolis, Indiana. The rule was signed by
the Secretary of State on December 19, 1995, and became effective on
January 18, 1996; it was published in the Indiana State Register on
February 1, 1996. IDEM formally submitted the VOL storage rule to EPA
on November 21, 1995, as a revision to the Indiana SIP for ozone;
supplemental documentation to this revision was submitted on February
14, 1996. EPA made a finding of completeness of this submittal in a
letter dated February 23, 1996.
The November 21, 1995, and February 14, 1996, submittals include
the following rules:
326 IAC 8-9 Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels
(1) Applicability
(2) Exemptions
(3) Definitions
(4) Standards
(5) Testing and procedures
(6) Record keeping and reporting requirements
II. Evaluation of Rule
As previously discussed, Indiana intends that this VOL storage SIP
revision submittal will be one of the control measures under 15% ROP
plan for Clark and Floyd Counties, and included in the contingency plan
for Lake and Porter Counties. A review of what emission reduction this
SIP achieves for purposes of the Indiana 15% ROP plan will be addressed
when EPA takes rulemaking action on the Clark and Floyd Counties 15%
ROP plan and Lake and Porter Counties contingency plan SIPs. (EPA will
take
[[Page 2595]]
rulemaking on these plans in a subsequent rulemaking action).
To determine the approvability of the Indiana VOL storage SIP
submission, the rule was reviewed for consistency with section 110 and
part D of the Act, and with EPA RACT guidance. Because there is no
published CTG for VOL storage tanks at this time, EPA is using the
draft model rule contained in the draft CTG and the ACT (draft model
rule) to determine whether the Indiana rule constitutes RACT. Once the
CTG is published, however, State VOL storage rules must achieve the
CTG's stringency of control. A summary of the rule and discussion of
EPA's analysis follows. For the complete requirements of this SIP
revision, interested parties should see the 326 IAC 8-9 rule.
326 IAC 8-9-1 Applicability
This section establishes which VOL storage operations are subject
to the rule. Beginning October 1, 1995, stationary vessels used to
store VOL that are located in Clark, Floyd, Lake, and Porter Counties
are subject to all of the requirements of the rule, except those
vessels with a capacity of less than 39,000 gallons, a maximum true
vapor pressure of less than 0.75 pounds per square inch absolute
(psia), or otherwise exempted under section 2. VOL storage vessels with
a capacity less than 39,000 gallons, or a maximum vapor pressure of
less than 0.75 psia, however, are subject to certain record keeping and
reporting requirements in section 6. These applicability criteria are
consistent with applicability criteria contained in the draft model
rule, and, therefore, are approvable.
326 IAC 8-9-2 Exemptions
This section exempts the following vessels from the requirements of
this rule: (1) vessels at coke oven byproduct plants; (2) pressure
vessels designed to operate in excess of 29.4 psia and without
emissions to the atmosphere; (3) vessels that are permanently attached
to mobile vehicles such as trucks, rail cars, barges, or ships; (4)
vessels with a design capacity less than or equal to 420,000 gallons
used for petroleum or condensate stored, processed, or treated prior to
custody transfer; (5) vessels located at bulk gasoline plants; (6)
storage vessels located at gasoline service stations; (7) vessels used
to store beverage alcohol; and (8) stationary vessels that are subject
to any provision of 40 CFR part 60, subpart Kb, New Source Performance
Standard for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage. These exemption
provisions are consistent with exemption provisions in the draft model
rule and, therefore, are approvable.
326 IAC 8-9-3 Definitions
This section includes the following definitions to apply throughout
the Indiana rule: (1) Condensate; (2) Custody transfer; (3) Fill; (4)
Gasoline Service Station; (5) Maximum True Vapor Pressure; (6)
Petroleum; (7) Petroleum Liquids; (8) Reid Vapor Pressure; (9) Vessel;
(10) Volatile Organic Liquid; and (11) Waste. The term, ``bulk gasoline
plant,'' which is used in section 2 under the rule, is already defined
in section 326 IAC 1-2-7. These definitions are generally consistent
with those provided in the ACT's model rule. The definition of maximum
true vapor pressure specifies the use of standard reference texts such
as certain American Petroleum Institute publications, AP-42, and the
Chemical Rubber Company's Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, to
determine the maximum true vapor pressure of VOL in a particular vessel
at the highest calendar month average ambient temperature in Lake and
Porter Counties, which is 73 degrees Fahrenheit, and in Clark and Floyd
Counties, which is 77.7 degrees Fahrenheit. This is consistent with the
option contained in the draft model rule to use standard reference
texts to determine maximum true vapor pressure. The definition of
maximum true vapor pressure is approvable.
326 IAC 8-9-4 Standards
Section 4(a) requires that the owner or operator of each vessel
with a capacity greater than or equal to 39,000 gallons and which
stores VOL with a maximum true vapor pressure greater than or equal to
0.75 psia but less than 11.1 psia shall reduce emissions in accordance
with the following control requirements.
Each vessel having a permanently fixed roof is required by section
4(a)(1) to have installed on or before May 1, 1996 either: (A) an
internal floating roof meeting the standards for such roofs as
specified in section 4(c) of the rule; (B) a closed vent system and
control device meeting the standards for such equipment as specified in
section 4(d) of the rule; or (C) an equivalent emission control system
resulting in equivalent emissions reductions to that obtained by
installing an internal floating roof meeting the standards of section
4(c).
Each vessel having an internal floating roof is required by section
4(a)(2) to have installed either: (A) an internal floating roof meeting
the standards for such roofs as specified in section 4(c) of the rule
at the time of the next schedule vessel cleaning, but not later than
May 1, 2006; (B) a closed vent system and control device meeting the
standards for such equipment as specified in section 4(d) of the rule,
on or before May 1, 1996; or (C) an equivalent emissions control system
resulting in equivalent emissions reductions to that obtained by
installing an internal floating roof meeting the standards of section
4(c), on or before May 1, 1996.
Each vessel having an external floating roof is required by section
4(a)(3) to be installed with either: (A) an external floating roof
meeting the standards for such roofs as specified in section 4(e) of
the rule at the time of the next scheduled vessel cleaning, but not
later than May 1, 2006; (B) a closed vent system and control device
meeting the standards for such equipment as specified in section 4(d)
of the rule, on or before May 1, 1996; or (C) an equivalent emissions
control system on or before May 1, 1996, resulting in equivalent
emissions reductions to that which would be obtained by installing an
external floating roof meeting the standards of section 4(e).
Although sections 4(a)(1)(C), 4(a)(2)(C), and 4(a)(3)(C) specify
that sources may comply by using an ``equivalent control system'' to
the rule's roof and sealing requirements if equivalent VOC reductions
are obtained by May 1, 1996, Indiana has indicated that no sources have
used that option for compliance. All sources covered under this rule,
therefore, are required to meet either the applicable roof and seals
requirements under sections 4(a)(1)(A), 4(a)(2)(A), and 4(a)(3)(A), or
the applicable closed vent system and control device requirements under
sections 4(a)(1)(B), 4(a)(2)(B), and 4(a)(3)(B). Therefore, provisions
which would require alternative control methods to be subject to EPA
review, which is generally required by EPA for RACT rules, is not
necessary.
Section 4(b) requires that each vessel with a capacity of greater
than 39,000 gallons that stores VOL with a maximum true vapor pressure
greater than or equal to 11.1 psia shall equip each vessel with a
closed vent and control device meeting the standards for such equipment
as specified in section 4(d) of the rule.
Section 4(c) specifies that internal floating roofs be equipped
with one of the following: (A) a foam or liquid-filled seal mounted in
contact with the liquid; (B) two seals mounted one above the other so
that each forms a continuous closure that completely covers the space
between the wall of the vessel and the edge of the internal floating
roof; or (C) a mechanical shoe seal that consists of
[[Page 2596]]
a metal sheet held vertically against the wall of the vessel by springs
or weighted levers and that is connected by braces to the floating
roof, with a flexible coated fabric, or envelope, spanning the annular
space between the metal sheet and floating roof. Section 4(c) also
requires that the internal floating roof rest or float on the liquid
surface during storage of VOL, and that certain equipment be used to
properly seal the various fittings of the vessel.
Section 4(d) provides that closed vent systems and control devices
being used to comply with the rule meet the following specifications.
The closed vent system must be designed to collect all VOC vapors and
gases discharged from the vessel and operated with no detectable
emission, as indicated by an instrument reading of less than 500 parts
per million above background and visual inspections in accordance with
the methods specified in 40 CFR 60, subpart VV, 60.485(C). The control
device must be designed and operated to reduce inlet VOC emissions by
95% or greater. If a flare is used as the control device, it shall meet
the specifications described in the general control device requirements
in 40 CFR 60.18, General Provisions.
Section 4(e) requires that each external floating roof tank be
equipped with a closure device between the wall of the storage vessel
and the roof edge. The closure device is to consist of a primary seal
and a secondary seal. The primary seal is required to completely cover
the annular space between the edge of the floating roof and vessel wall
and shall be either a liquid mounted seal or a shoe seal. The secondary
seal shall completely cover the annular space between the external
floating roof and the wall of the vessel in a continuous fashion.
Section 4(e) also requires that the external floating roof rest or
float on the liquid surface during storage of VOL, and that certain
equipment be used to properly seal the various fittings of the vessel.
The control requirements contained for fixed roof tanks, internal
floating roof tanks, external floating roof tanks, and closed vent
systems and control devices in section 4 (a) through (e) are generally
consistent with the draft model rule, and, therefore, are approvable.
326 IAC 8-9-5 Testing and Procedures
This section provides the test methods which are to be used to
determine compliance with the rule, which consists of visual inspection
methods for the internal or external floating roof and the various
seals required for each type of roof. This section also indicates the
various frequencies by which these inspections are to be conducted,
depending on the type of seals used. In addition, section 5 specifies
the time frame by which any defects found by a visual inspection must
be addressed. Furthermore, this section requires that IDEM be notified
at least 30 days in advance so that the agency can have the opportunity
to have an observer present. As for VOL storage operations which are
complying by means of a closed vent system and control device, the
owner or operator must submit to IDEM before January 1, 1996, an
operating plan containing documentation demonstrating that the control
device will achieve the required control efficiency during maximum
loading conditions, and a description of the parameter or parameters to
be monitored to ensure the control device will be operated in
conformance with its design. Affected sources must operate the closed
vent system and control device and monitor the control devices'
parameters in accordance with the operating plan unless the plan is
revised by IDEM. Those sources complying through means of a closed vent
system and flare shall meet the requirements specified in the general
control device requirements in 40 CFR 60.18(e) and 40 CFR 60.18(f).
These testing requirements are generally consistent with test methods
expressed in the draft model rule, and, therefore, are approvable.
326 IAC 8-9-6 Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
The Indiana rule establishes certain recordkeeping and reporting
requirements under section 6 which took effect when the rule took
effect in October 1, 1995 (as provided under section 1 of the rule).
Section 6(a) requires that records be kept for at least 3 years unless
specified otherwise. Section 6(b) requires subject sources to maintain
a record for the life of each affected vessel and report to IDEM the
vessel's identification number, dimensions, capacity, and a description
of the vessel's emission control equipment, or schedule for the
installation of such equipment, with a certification that the equipment
meets the applicable standards. Sources must also, under section
6(c)and 6(d), keep for at least 3 years records of the visual
inspection conducted, any required measurements taken, and action taken
to address defects, and report to IDEM within 30 days any defects found
and the date and action taken to address defects.
Those sources complying through means of a closed vent system with
a control device must, under section 6(e), maintain a record of the
operating plan and parameter values monitored. Those sources complying
through means of a closed vent system with a flare must furnish a
report containing required measurements within 6 months of the initial
start-up date, and a semiannual report of all periods recorded under
section 40 CFR 60.115 in which the pilot flame was absent.
Section 6(g) requires VOL storage vessels with a design capacity
greater than 39,000 gallons storing a VOL with a maximum true vapor
pressure greater than or equal to 0.5 psia but less than 0.75 psia to
maintain a daily record of the maximum true vapor pressure of the VOL
stored in the vessel. Section 6(h) requires vessels with a design
capacity greater than 39,000 gallons storing a VOL with a maximum true
vapor pressure less than 0.75 psia to maintain a record and notify IDEM
within 30 days when the maximum true vapor pressure of the VOL exceeds
0.75 psia. Vessels equipped with a closed vent system and control
device are exempt from subsection (g) and (h), as provided under
subsection (f).
Section 6(i) contains procedures for determining the maximum true
vapor pressure. Section 6(j) requires certain monitoring requirements
for vessels storing a waste mixture of indeterminate or variable
composition. These record keeping and reporting requirements are
consistent with those provided under the draft model rule, and,
therefore, are approvable.
III. Final Action
Based upon the analysis above, the EPA finds that Indiana's
regulation covering VOL storage operations, 326 IAC 8-9, as submitted
on November 21, 1995, and February 14, 1996, is generally consistent
with EPA's guidance in the draft model rule for this source category
and, therefore, is considered to constitute RACT. EPA, therefore, is
approving this rule as a revision to Indiana's ozone SIP.
The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because
EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal
Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision
should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be
effective on March 18, 1997 unless, by February 18, 1997, adverse or
critical comments are received.
If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn
before the effective date by publishing a subsequent rulemaking that
will
[[Page 2597]]
withdraw the final action. All public comments received will be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a
proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should
do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is
advised that this action will be effective on March 18, 1997.
Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting, allowing
or establishing a precedent for any future request for revision to any
SIP. Each request for revision to the SIP shall be considered
separately in light of specific technical, economic, and environmental
factors and in relation to relevant statutory and regulatory
requirements.
IV. Administrative Requirements
A. Executive Order 12866
This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature
by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the
Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a
July 10, 1995, memorandum from Mary D. Nichols, Assistant Administrator
for Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
B. Regulatory Flexibility
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. section 600 et seq.,
EPA must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact
of any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. sections 603
and 604. Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small
entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises,
and government entities with jurisdiction over populations of less than
50,000.
SIP approvals under section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Act
do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements
that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP
approval does not impose any new requirements, the Administrator
certifies that it does not have a significant impact on any small
entities affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State
relationship under the Act, preparation of a flexibility analysis would
constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of the
State action. The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions
concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. versus EPA., 427
U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
C. Unfunded Mandates
Under Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995,
signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must undertake various actions
in association with any proposed or final rule that includes a Federal
mandate that may result in estimated costs to state, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate; or to the private sector, of $100 million
or more. This Federal action approves pre-existing requirements under
state or local law, and imposes no new requirements. Accordingly, no
additional costs to state, local, or tribal governments, or the private
sector, result from this action.
D. Submission to Congress and the General Accounting Office
Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the
General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's
Federal Register. This rule is not a major rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
E. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by March 18, 1997. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 25, 1996.
Valdas V. Adamkus,
Regional Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 52, chapter I, title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
2. Section 52.770 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(111) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.770 Identification of Plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(111) On November 21, 1995, and February 14, 1996, Indiana
submitted a rule for the control of volatile organic compound emissions
from volatile organic liquid storage operations in Clark, Floyd, Lake,
and Porter Counties.
(i) Incorporation by reference. 326 Indiana Administrative Code 8-
9: Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels, Section 1: Applicability,
Section 2: Exemptions, Section 3: Definitions, Section 4: Standards,
Section 5: Testing and procedures, Section 6: Record keeping and
reporting requirements. Adopted by the Indiana Air Pollution Control
Board May 3, 1995. Filed with the Secretary of State December 19, 1995.
Published at Indiana Register, Volume 19, Number 5, February 1, 1996.
Effective January 18, 1996.
[FR Doc. 97-1081 Filed 1-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
