94-1154. Indirect Food Additives: Adjuvants, Production Aids, and Sanitizers  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-1154]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: January 19, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 178
    
    [Docket No. 90F-0257]
    
     
    
    Indirect Food Additives: Adjuvants, Production Aids, and 
    Sanitizers
    
    Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    Action: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Summary: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the food 
    additive regulations to provide for the safe use of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-
    4-hydroxyhydrocinnamic acid triester with 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-
    triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione as an antioxidant for polyester 
    elastomers in contact with dry food and rubber articles intended for 
    repeated use in contact with food. This action is in response to a 
    petition filed by the Ciba-Geigy Corp.
    
    DATES: Effective January 19, 1994; written objections and requests for 
    a hearing by February 18, 1994.
    
    Addresses: Submit written objections to the Dockets Management Branch 
    (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., 
    Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vir D. Anand, Center for Food Safety 
    and Applied Nutrition (HFS-216), Food and Drug Administration, 200 C 
    St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-254-9500.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a notice published in the Federal 
    Register of August 28, 1990 (55 FR 35188), FDA announced that a food 
    additive petition (FAP 0B4222) had been filed by Ciba-Geigy Corp., 
    Seven Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532-2188. The petition proposed that 
    Sec. 178.2010 Antioxidants and/or stabilizers for polymers (21 CFR 
    178.2010) be amended to provide for the safe use of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-
    4-hydroxyhydrocinnamic acid triester with 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-
    triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione as an antioxidant for polyester 
    elastomers in contact with dry food and rubber articles intended for 
    repeated use in contact with food.
        FDA, in its evaluation of the safety of this additive, reviewed the 
    safety of the additive and the chemical impurities that may be present 
    in the additive resulting from its manufacturing process. Although the 
    additive itself has not been shown to cause cancer, it has been found 
    to contain minute amounts of unreacted ethyl acrylate, a carcinogenic 
    reactant used in the manufacture of the additive. Residual amounts of 
    reactants and manufacturing aids, such as ethyl acrylate, are commonly 
    found as contaminants in chemical products, including food additives.
    
    I. Determination of Safety
    
        Under section 409(c)(3)(A) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
    Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 348(c)(3)(A), the so-called ``general safety 
    clause'' of the statute, a food additive cannot be approved for a 
    particular use unless a fair evaluation of the data available to FDA 
    establishes that the additive is safe for that use. FDA's food additive 
    regulations (21 CFR 170.3(i)) define ``safe'' as ``a reasonable 
    certainty in the minds of competent scientist that the substance is not 
    harmful under the intended conditions of use.''
        The anticancer or Delaney clause (section 409(c)(3)(A) of the act) 
    further provides that no food additive shall be deemed safe if it is 
    found to induce cancer when ingested by man or animal. Importantly, 
    however, the Delaney clause applies to the additive itself and not to 
    impurities in the additive. That is, where an additive itself has not 
    been shown to cause cancer, but contains a carcinogenic impurity, the 
    additive is properly evaluated under the general safety clause using 
    risk assessment procedures to determine whether there is a reasonable 
    certainty that no harm will result from the proposed use of the 
    additive.  Scott v. FDA, 728 F.2d 322 (6th Cir. 1984).
    
    II. Safety of the Petitioned Use of the Additive
    
        FDA estimates that the petitioned use of the additive 3,5-di-tert-
    butyl-4-hydroxyhydrocinnamic acid triester with 1,3,5-tris(2-
    hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione will result in 
    exposure to the additive of no greater than 100 parts per billion (ppb) 
    in the daily diet (Ref. 1).
        FDA does not ordinarily consider chronic toxicological testing to 
    be necessary to determine the safety of an additive whose use will 
    result in such low exposure levels (Ref. 2), and the agency has not 
    required such testing here. However, the agency has reviewed the 
    available toxicological data from acute toxicity studies, subchronic 
    studies, and teratological studies on the additive. No adverse effects 
    were reported in these studies.
        FDA has evaluated the safety of this additive under the general 
    safety clause, considering all available data and using risk assessment 
    procedures to estimate the upper-bound limit of risk presented by ethyl 
    acrylate, a carcinogenic chemical that may be present as an impurity in 
    the additive. This risk evaluation of the carcinogenic impurity ethyl 
    acrylate has two aspects: (1) Assessment of the exposure to the 
    impurity from the proposed use of the additive; and (2) extrapolation 
    of the risk observed in the animal bioassays to the conditions of 
    probable exposure to humans.
    
    A. Ethyl Acrylate
    
        Using risk assessment procedures, FDA has estimated the 
    hypothetical worst-case exposure to ethyl acrylate from the petitioned 
    use of the additive in the manufacture of polyester elastomers and 
    rubber articles for repeated use and currently regulated uses to be 380 
    parts per quadrillion of the daily diet (3 kilograms), or 1 nanogram 
    (ng) per person per day (Ref. 1). The agency used data from the 
    National Toxicology Program report (No. 259: 1986), a bioassay on ethyl 
    acrylate, to estimate the upper-bound limit of lifetime human risk from 
    exposure to this chemical stemming from the proposed use of the 
    additive and the level of ethyl acrylate that may be present in the 
    additive (Ref. 3). The results of the bioassay on ethyl acrylate 
    demonstrated that the material was carcinogenic for rats and mice under 
    the conditions of the study. The test material induced squamous cell 
    neoplasms in both sexes of F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice when 
    administered by gavage in corn oil.
        Based on the potential exposure of 1 ng per person per day, FDA 
    estimates that the upper-bound limit of individual lifetime risk from 
    the use of the 3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyhydrocinnamic acid triester 
    with 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione is 
    8.1x10-11, or 8.1 in 100 billion (Ref. 4). Because of the numerous 
    conservatisms in the exposure estimate, the actual lifetime averaged 
    individual exposure to ethyl acrylate is expected to be substantially 
    less than the estimated daily intake, and therefore the calculated 
    upper-bound limit of risk would be less. Thus, the agency concludes 
    that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm from exposure to 
    ethyl acrylate would result from the proposed use of 3,5-di-tert-butyl-
    4-hydroxyhydrocinnamic acid triester with 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-
    triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione.
    
    B. Need for Specifications
    
        The agency has also considered whether a specification is necessary 
    to control the amount of ethyl acrylate impurity in the food additive. 
    The agency finds that a specification is not necessary for the 
    following reasons: (1) Because of the low level at which ethyl acrylate 
    may be expected to remain as an impurity following production of the 
    additive, the agency would not expect this impurity to become a 
    component of food at other than extremely small levels; and (2) the 
    upper-bound limit of lifetime risk from exposure to this impurity, even 
    under worst-case assumptions, is very low, less than 8.1 in 100 
    billion.
    
    C. Conclusion on Safety
    
        FDA has evaluated data in the petition and other relevant material 
    and concludes that the proposed use of the additive in polyester 
    elastomers in contact with dry food and rubber articles intended for 
    repeated use in contact with food is safe. Based on this information, 
    the agency has also concluded that the additive will have the intended 
    technical effect. Therefore, Sec. 178.2010 should be amended as set 
    forth below.
        In accordance with Sec. 171.1(h) (21 CFR 171.1(h)), the petition 
    and the documents that FDA considered and relied upon in reaching its 
    decision to approve the petition are available for inspection at the 
    Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition by appointment with the 
    information contact person listed above. As provided in 21 CFR 
    171.1(h), the agency will delete from the documents any materials that 
    are not available for public disclosure before making the documents 
    available for inspection.
    
    III. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has carefully considered the potential environmental 
    effects of this action. FDA has concluded that the action will not have 
    a significant impact on the human environment, and that an 
    environmental impact statement is not required. The agency's finding of 
    no significant impact and the evidence supporting that finding, 
    contained in an environmental assessment, may be seen in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday 
    through Friday.
    
    IV. Objections
    
        Any person who will be adversely affected by this regulation may at 
    anytime on or before February 18, 1994, file with the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written objection thereto. Each 
    objection shall be separately numbered, and each numbered objection 
    shall specify with particularity the provisions of the regulation to 
    which objection is made and the grounds for the objection. Each 
    numbered objection on which a hearing is requested shall specifically 
    so state. Failure to request a hearing for any particular objection 
    shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing on that objection. 
    Each numbered objection for which a hearing is requested shall include 
    a detailed description and analysis of the specific factual information 
    intended to be presented in support of the objection in the event that 
    a hearing is held. Failure to include such a description and analysis 
    for any particular objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to 
    a hearing on the objection. Three copies of all documents shall be 
    submitted and shall be identified with the docket number found in 
    brackets in the heading of this document. Any objection received in 
    response to the regulation may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    V. References
    
        The following references have been placed on display in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) and may be seen by interested persons 
    between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
        1. Memorandum dated November 9, 1992, from the Food and Color 
    Additive Review Section (HFF-415), Indirect Additives Branch (HFF-
    335), concerning FAP 0B4222 (Ciba-Geigy Corp.) exposure to the food 
    additive and its component (ethyl acrylate).
        2. Kokoski, C. J., ``Regulatory Food Additive Toxicology,'' in 
    Chemical Safety Regulation and Compliance, pp. 24-33, edited by F. 
    Homburger J. K. Marquis, and S. Karger, New York, NY, 1985.
        3. ``Carcinogenesis Studies of Ethyl Acrylate (CAS Reg. No. 140-
    88-5) in F-344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice'' (gavage studies), 
    National Toxicology Program, Technical Report Series, No. 259, 
    December 1986.
        4. Memorandum dated April 19, 1993, from the Quantitative Risk 
    Assessment Committee, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, 
    concerning ethyl acrylate, FAP 0B4222.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 178
    
        Food additives, Food packaging.
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 
    178 is amended as follows:
    
    PART 178--INDIRECT FOOD ADDITIVES: ADJUVANTS, PRODUCTION AIDS, AND 
    SANITIZERS
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 178 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 201, 402, 409, 721 of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 342, 348, 379e).
    
        2. Section 178.2010 is amended in the table in paragraph (b) for 
    the entry ``3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyhydrocinnamic acid triester with 
    1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione'' by 
    numerically adding a new entry ``5'' under the heading ``Limitations'' 
    to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 178.2010  Antioxidants and/or stabilizers for polymers.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) * * *
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Substances                           Limitations           
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      *****                                 
    3,5-Di-tert-butyl-4-                  For use only:                     
     hydroxyhydrocinnamic acid triester   * * *                             
     with 1,3,5-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)-s-   5. At levels not to exceed 2      
     triazine-2,4,6-(1H,3H,5H)-trione      percent by weight of polyester   
     (CAS Reg. No. 34137-09-2).            elastomers, complying with Sec.  
                                           177.1590 of this chapter, in     
                                           contact with dry food only, and  
                                           finished rubber articles for     
                                           repeated use, complying with Sec.
                                           177.2600 of this chapter, in     
                                           contact with all foods, at       
                                           temperatures not to exceed 150   
                                           deg.F.                           
                                      *****                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
        Dated: January 12, 1994.
    Michael R. Taylor,
    Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
    [FR Doc. 94-1154 Filed 1-18-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/19/1994
Published:
01/19/1994
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-1154
Dates:
Effective January 19, 1994; written objections and requests for a hearing by February 18, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: January 19, 1994, Docket No. 90F-0257
CFR: (1)
21 CFR 178.2010