95-1177. Sustainable Growth  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 3925-3929]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-1177]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY
    
    
    Sustainable Growth
    
    ACTION: Notice--Request for proposals.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of Citizen Exchanges (E/P) announces a competitive 
    grants program for nonprofit organizations in support of projects on 
    the theme of Sustainable Growth for audiences in the following 
    geographical areas: Sub-saharan Africa; American Republics; East Asia; 
    Eastern Europe and the NIS; Middle East; and Western Europe. USIA 
    particularly is seeking projects which link American institutions and 
    specialists with partners overseas. New and creative approaches to the 
    issue of sustainable growth will be especially welcome. Proposals which 
    request USIA funding of less than $135,000 and which include 
    significant cost sharing will be deemed more competitive.
        Interested applicants are urged to read the complete Federal 
    Register announcement before addressing inquiries to the Office or 
    submitting their proposals.
        After the deadline for submitting proposals, USIA officers may not 
    discuss this competition in any way with applicants until final 
    decisions are made.
        Announcement name and number: All communications concerning this 
    announcement should refer to the Sustainable Growth Grant Program, 
    announcement number E/P-95-43. Please refer to title and number in all 
    correspondence or telephone calls to USIA.
    
    DATES: Deadline for Proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. 
    Information Agency by 5 p.m. Washington, DC time on March 3, 1995. 
    Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents postmarked on 
    March 3, 1995, but received at a later date. It is the responsibility 
    of each grant applicant to ensure that proposals are received by the 
    above deadline .
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Interested organizations/institutions must contact the Office of 
    Citizen Exchanges, E/P, Room 216, United States Information Agency, 301 
    Fourth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, telephone (202) 619-5326, fax 
    (202) 260-0437, to request detailed application packets, which include 
    award criteria, all application forms, and guidelines for preparing 
    proposals, including specific criteria for preparation of the proposal 
    budget. Please direct inquiries on programmatic matters to the USIA 
    Officer identified under each geographic heading.
    
    ADDRESSES: Applicants must follow all instructions given in the 
    Proposal Submission Instructions and send only complete applications 
    to: U.S. Information Agency, REF: E/P-95-43 Sustainable Growth Grant 
    Competition, Grants Management Division (E/XE), 301 Fourth Street, SW., 
    Room 336, Washington, DC 20547.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the legislation authorizing the 
    Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs, programs must maintain a non-
    political character and should be balanced and representative of the 
    diversity of American political, social, and cultural life. 
    ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass 
    differences including but not limited to race, gender, religion, 
    geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical challenges. 
    Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this 
    principle.
    
    Overview
    
        The Office of Citizen Exchanges works with U.S. private sector non-
    profit organizations on cooperative international group projects that 
    introduce American and foreign participants to each others' social, 
    economic, and political structures; and their international interests.
    
    Guidelines
    
        Applicants should carefully note the following restrictions and 
    recommendations for proposals in specific geographical areas:
    
    Africa, Sub-Saharan
    
    Economics and the Environment in Africa
        Proposals are invited to conduct a person for 3-4 countries in one 
    subregion of Africa (Southern or Eastern or Western Africa) to address 
    environmental issues and their relationship to economic planning. The 
    program should encourage coordination of efforts among the African 
    countries, and it should include at least two phases, one of which 
    would bring African specialists to the U.S., and the other would send 
    U.S. specialists to the selected African subregion. Issues which might 
    be addressed (not necessarily all) include wildlife protection, 
    national parks, environmental law, population dynamics, ecosystem 
    protection, and relationship of such issues to national development 
    planning. Inquiries should be directed to Program Specialist Stephen 
    Taylor, (202) 619-5319, Internet [email protected]
    Cultural Property, Tourism, and Economic Development
        Proposals are invited to conduct a program for African specialists 
    which would contribute to preservation of 
    
    [[Page 3926]]
    cultural property and national heritage, help publicize cultural 
    attractions and encourage tourism, and address the relationships of 
    these goals to economic planning. The program should address the roles 
    of citizen and government action and encourage cooperation among 
    African countries and the U.S. on these goals. It should also analyze 
    relevant legislation, such as the 1970 UNESCO Convention on Cultural 
    Property and the U.S. Cultural Property Act of 1983. The program should 
    include at least two phases, one of which would bring African 
    specialists to the U.S., and the other would send U.S. specialists to 
    the selected African countries. Inquiries should be directed to Program 
    Specialist Charlotte Peterson, (202) 619-5319, Internet 
    [email protected]
    Trade and Sustainable Growth
        Proposals are invited to conduct a program for participants from 4-
    5 African countries which would address issues of trade and investment 
    policies and their relation to national development planning. Issues to 
    be addressed might include incentives for foreign investment, local 
    benefits and problems from foreign investment, impact of tariffs, 
    currency devaluation, development of new exports, and international 
    marketing. Participants in the program might include entrepreneurs, 
    representatives of business associations, government representatives 
    (executive and legislative) or others with influence on these issues. 
    The program should be comprised of at least two phases, one of which 
    would bring African specialists to the U.S. and the other would send 
    U.S. counterparts to participating African countries. Inquiries should 
    be directed to Program Specialist Stephen Taylor, (202) 619-5319, 
    Internet [email protected]
    
    American Republics
    
        In most of this hemisphere, governments, economists, and various 
    ``technocratic'' experts have come to believe that open markets and 
    minimal government restraint on commercial practices lead to higher 
    macro-economic growth rates. But others fear this approach leaves many 
    businesses and their employees behind, ill-equipped to respond to the 
    rough-and-tumble realities of domestic and international competition. 
    USIA seeks proposals that will utilize exchanges to demonstrate that, 
    while innovation and competition inevitably displace some individuals, 
    the increased competition usually leads to greater prosperity not just 
    for entrepreneurs, but for most citizens. Programs which illustrate 
    this through visits to and by the citizens of areas affected by 
    business, plant and base closings, the depletion of mineral deposits, 
    the imposition of new environmental standards, etc., are more likely to 
    have an impact than programs relying solely on extended round-table 
    discussions of macro-economic theory and exposure to national economic 
    policy. Priority will be given to projects dealing with logical sub-
    regional groupings of no more than four countries (e.g., Central 
    America, the Caribbean, Andean nations, etc.), or to single-country 
    projects in large nations with enormous disparities between rich and 
    poor (e.g., Brazil and Mexico). Inquiries should be directed to Program 
    Specialist Laverne Johnson, (202) 619-5326, Internet [email protected]
    
    East Asia
    
    Burmese Environmental Project
        Proposals are invited to conduct a project that provides an 
    exchange between Burmese non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and U.S. 
    NGOs to examine, through workshops and professional consultation, the 
    role of NGOs in grassroots environmental education and awareness, and 
    the use and promotion of environmentally-appropriate technologies in 
    developing countries.
    Burmese Cultural Heritage
        Proposals are invited to conduct a project for Burmese NGO 
    representatives, academics, and selected government officials to 
    examine problems of cultural and natural heritage preservation in the 
    face of economic development, and the role of citizen and government 
    action. Projects would examine U.S. approaches to historic preservation 
    and rational economic development.
    Thai Cultural Heritage
        Project for Thai NGO activists, journalists and selected government 
    officials to examine problems of cultural and natural heritage 
    preservation in the face of economic development, and the role of 
    citizen and government action. Projects would examine U.S. approaches 
    to historic preservation and rational economic development. Inquiries 
    should be directed to Program Specialist Elroy Carlson, (202) 619-5326, 
    Internet [email protected]
    
    Middle East
    
    Environmental Education in the Eastern Mediterranean
        Proposals are invited for a program to assist scientists and 
    educators in countries of the Eastern Mediterranean (Syria, Jordan, 
    Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, and the Palestinian Authority) in developing 
    national and regional approaches to incorporating environmental 
    research into university and secondary educational curricula, 
    developing formal environmental education, and promoting general public 
    environmental awareness. The program should include at least two 
    phases, one of which would bring Middle Eastern specialists to the U.S. 
    for approximately one month to consult and work with American 
    specialists on developing curricula, texts, strategies for outreach, 
    and the like. The other phase would send U.S. specialists who had 
    participated in phase one to the Eastern Mediterranean to conduct, in 
    collaboration with their Middle Eastern counterparts, activities such 
    as teacher-training workshops, network building across participant 
    countries, setting plans for cross-country collaboration of educators 
    and their outreach to communities and governments. Inquiries should be 
    directed to Program Specialist Thomas Johnston, (202) 619-5319, 
    Internet [email protected]
    Water Resources Management in the Gulf States
        Proposals are invited for a multi-phased program to address the 
    interrelated issues of water resources management, environmental 
    protection, and sustainable economic development in Kuwait, Saudi 
    Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, and Oman. Emphasis should 
    be given to facilitating interaction among specialists in these 
    countries and U.S. counterparts for the sharing of ideas and to develop 
    a feasible plan for governmental and NGO action in addressing these 
    topics. The program design should include activities in both the United 
    States and the Gulf which would cover an assessment of needs, 
    development of collaborative networks and action agendas, as well as 
    outreach to wider audiences. At least one phase would bring specialists 
    from the Gulf to the U.S. and one phase would send U.S. specialists to 
    the Gulf. Inquiries should be directed to Program Specialist Thomas 
    Johnston, (202) 619-5319, Internet [email protected]
    
    Western Europe
    
    Pacific Northwest Environment Cooperation
        USIA seeks a proposal designed to exchange environmental experts 
    between the states of the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia. The 
    exchange would involve environmental 
    
    [[Page 3927]]
    leaders, specialists in environmental law, and representatives of the 
    governments of British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon, who would 
    arrange for reciprocal visits to research comparative environmental law 
    in their jurisdictions, culminating in their drafting recommendations 
    to their respective governments. Inquiries should be directed to 
    Program Specialist Christina Miner, (202) 619-5319, Internet 
    [email protected]
    
    Program Parameters
    
        The Office of Citizen Exchanges strongly encourages the 
    coordination of activities with respected universities, professional 
    associations, and major cultural institutions in the U.S. and abroad, 
    but particularly in the U.S. Projects should be intellectual and 
    cultural, not technical. Vocational training (an occupation other than 
    one requiring a baccalaureate or higher academic degree; e.g., clerical 
    work, auto maintenance, etc. and other occupations requiring less than 
    two years of higher education) and technical training (special and 
    practical knowledge of a mechanical or a scientific subject which 
    enhances mechanical, narrowly scientific, or semi-skilled capabilities) 
    are ineligible for support. In addition, scholarship programs are 
    ineligible for support.
        The Office does not support proposals limited to conferences or 
    seminars (i.e., one to fourteen-day programs with plenary sessions, 
    main speakers, panels, and a passive audience). It will support 
    conferences only insofar as they are part of a larger project in 
    duration and scope which is receiving USIA funding from this 
    competition. USIA-supported projects may include internships; study 
    tours; short-term, non-technical training; and extended, intensive 
    workshops taking place in the United States or overseas. The themes 
    addressed in exchange programs must be of long-term importance rather 
    than focused exclusively on current events or short-term issues. In 
    every case, a substantial rationale must be presented as part of the 
    proposal, one that clearly indicates the distinctive and important 
    contribution of the overall project, including where applicable the 
    expected yield of any associated conference. No funding is available 
    exclusively to send U.S. citizens to conferences or conference-type 
    seminars overseas; neither is funding available for bringing foreign 
    nationals to conferences or to routine professional association 
    meetings in the United States. Projects that duplicate what is 
    routinely carried out by private sector and/or public sector operations 
    will not be considered. The Office of Citizen Exchanges strongly 
    recommends that applicants consult with host country USIS posts, prior 
    to submitting proposals.
    
    Selection of Participants
    
        All grant proposals should clearly describe the types of persons 
    who will participate in the program as well as the process by which 
    participants will be selected. It is recommended that programs in 
    support U.S. internships include letters tentatively committing host 
    institutions to support the internships. In the selection of foreign 
    participants, USIA and USIS posts retain the right to nominate all 
    participants and to accept or deny participants recommended by grantee 
    institutions. However, grantee institutions are often asked by USIA to 
    suggest names of potential participants. The grantee institution will 
    also provide the names of American participants and brief (two pages) 
    biographical data on each American participant to the Office of Citizen 
    Exchanges for information purposes. Priority will be given to foreign 
    participants who have not previously traveled to the United States.
    
    Additional Guidance
    
        The Office of Citizen Exchanges offers the following additional 
    guidance to prospective applicants:
        1. Except where noted in the text, the Office of Citizen Exchanges 
    encourages project proposals involving more than one country. Pertinent 
    rationale which links countries in multi-country projects should be 
    included in the submission. Single-country projects that are clearly 
    defined and possess the potential for creating and strengthening 
    continuing linkages between foreign and U.S. institutions are also 
    welcome.
        2. Proposals for bilateral programs are subject to review and 
    comment by the USIS post in the relevant country, and pre-selected 
    participants will also be subject to USIS post review.
        3. Bilateral programs should clearly identify the counterpart 
    organization and provide evidence of the organization's participation.
        4. The Office of Citizen Exchanges will consider proposals for 
    activities which take place exclusively in other countries when USIS 
    posts are consulted in the design of the proposed program and in the 
    choice of the most suitable venues for such programs.
        5. Office of Citizen Exchanges grants are not given to support 
    projects whose focus is limited to technical or vocational subjects, or 
    for research projects, for publications funding, for student and/or 
    teacher/faculty exchanges, for sports and/or sports related programs. 
    Nor does this Office provide scholarships or support for long-term (a 
    semester or more) academic studies.
    
    Funding
    
        Proposals which request USIA funding of less than $135,000 and 
    which include significant cost sharing will be deemed more competitive. 
    Organizations with less than four years of successful experience in 
    managing international exchange programs are limited to $60,000. 
    Applicants are invited to provide both an all-inclusive budget as well 
    as separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or 
    activity in order to facilitate USIA decisions on funding. While an 
    all-inclusive budget must be provided with each proposal, separate 
    component budgets are optional. Since USIA grant assistance constitutes 
    only a portion of total project funding, proposals should list and 
    provide evidence of other anticipated sources of financial and in-kind 
    support. Cost sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or 
    indirect costs.
        The Recipient must maintain written records to support all 
    allowable costs which are claimed as being its contribution to cost 
    participation, as well as costs to be paid by the Federal government. 
    Such records are subject to audit. The basis for determining the value 
    of cash and in-kind contributions must be in accordance with OMB 
    Circular A-110, Attachment E--Cost Sharing and Matching, and should be 
    described in the proposal.
    
    Eligible Costs
    
        The following project costs are eligible for consideration for 
    funding:
        1. International and domestic air fares; visas; transit costs; 
    ground transportation costs.
        2. Per Diem. For the U.S. program, organizations have the option of 
    using a flat $140/day for program participants or the published U.S. 
    Federal per diem rates for individual American cities. For activities 
    outside the U.S., the published Federal per diem rates must be used.
    
        Note: U.S. escorting staff must use the published Federal per 
    diem rates, not the flat rate.
    
        3. Interpreters. If needed, interpreters for the U.S. program are 
    provided by the U.S. State Department Language Services Division. 
    Typically, a pair of simultaneous interpreters is provided for every 
    four visitors who need interpretation. USIA grants do not pay for 
    foreign interpreters to accompany delegations from their home country. 
    
    [[Page 3928]]
    Grant proposal budgets should contain a flat $140/day per diem for each 
    Department of State interpreter, as well as home-program-home air 
    transportation of $400 per interpreter plus any U.S. travel expenses 
    during the program. Salary expenses are covered centrally and should 
    not be part of an applicant's proposed budget.
        4. Book and cultural allowance. Participants are entitled to and 
    escorts are reimbursed a one-time cultural allowance of $150 per 
    person, plus a participant book allowance of $50. U.S. staff do not get 
    these benefits.
        5. Consultants. May be used to provide specialized expertise or to 
    make presentations. Daily honoraria generally do not exceed $250 per 
    day. Subcontracting organizations may also be used, in which case the 
    written agreement between the prospective grantee and subcontractor 
    should be included in the proposal.
        6. Room rental, which generally should not exceed $250 per day.
        7. Materials development. Proposals may contain costs to purchase, 
    develop, and translate materials for participants.
        8. One working meal per project. Per capita costs may not exceed 
    $5-8 for a lunch and $14-20 for a dinner; excluding room rental. The 
    number of invited guests may not exceed participants by more than a 
    factor of two to one.
        9. A return travel allowance of $70 for each participant which is 
    to be used for incidental expenditures incurred during international 
    travel.
        10. In most cases, USIA-funded delegates will be covered under the 
    terms of a USIA-sponsored health insurance policy with the premium is 
    paid by USIA directly to the insurance company. For additional 
    information on insurance coverage, contact the E/P program officer.
        11. Other costs necessary for the effective administration of the 
    program, including salaries for grant organization employees, benefits, 
    and other direct and indirect costs per detailed instructions in the 
    application package. Please refer to the Application Package for 
    complete budget guidelines.
    
    Review Process
    
        USIA will acknowledge receipt of all proposals and will review them 
    for technical eligibility. Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they 
    do not fully adhere to the guidelines established herein and in the 
    Application Packet. Eligible proposals will be forwarded to panels of 
    USIA officers for advisory review. All eligible proposals will also be 
    reviewed by the budget and contract offices, as well the USIA 
    geographic regional office and the USIS post overseas, where 
    appropriate. Proposals may also be reviewed by the USIA's Office of 
    General Counsel or by other Agency elements. Funding decisions are at 
    the discretion of the USIA Associate Director for Educational and 
    Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for grant awards resides 
    with USIA's contracting officer.
    
    Review Criteria
    
        USIA will consider proposals based on their conformance with the 
    objectives and considerations already stated in this RFP, as well as 
    the following criteria:
    
    1. Quality of Program Idea
    
        Proposals should exhibit originality, substance, precision, and 
    relevance to the Agency mission.
    
    2. Program Planning
    
        Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate substance 
    undertakings and logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to 
    the program overview and guidelines described above.
    
    3. Ability to Achieve Program Objectives
    
        Objectives should be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposal 
    should clearly demonstrate how the institution will meet the program 
    objectives and plan.
    
    4. Multiplier Effect
    
        Proposed programs should strengthen long-term mutual understanding, 
    including maximum sharing of information and establishment of long-term 
    institutional and individual linkages.
    
    5. Value to U.S.--Partner Country Relations
    
        Proposed projects should receive positive assessments by USIA's 
    geographic area desk and overseas officers of program need, potential 
    impact, and significance in the partner.
    
    6. Institutional Capacity
    
        Proposed personnel and institutional resources should be adequate 
    and appropriate to achieve the program or project's goal.
    
    7. Institution Reputation/Ability
    
        Proposal should demonstrate an institutional record of successful 
    exchange programs, including responsible fiscal management and full 
    compliance with all reporting requirements for past Agency grants as 
    determined by USIA's Office of Contracts. The Agency will consider the 
    past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential of 
    new applicants.
    
    8. Follow-On Activities
    
        Proposals should provide a plan for continued follow-on activity 
    (without USIA support) which ensures that USIA supported programs are 
    not isolated events.
    
    9. Evaluation Plan
    
        Proposals should provide a plan for a thorough and objective 
    evaluation of the program/project by the grantee institution.
    
    10. Cost-Effectiveness
    
        The overhead and administrative components of the proposal, 
    including salaries and honoraria, should be kept as low as possible. 
    All other items should be necessary and appropriate.
    
    11. Cost-Sharing
    
        Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other private sector 
    support as well as institutional direct funding contributions.
    
    12. Support of Diversity
    
        Proposal should demonstrate the recipients' commitment to promoting 
    the awareness and understanding of diversity throughout the program. 
    This can be accomplished through documentation (such as a written 
    statement or account) summarizing past and/or on-going activities and 
    efforts that further the principle of diversity within both their 
    organization and their activities.
    
    Notice
    
        The Office of Citizen Exchanges reserves the right to reduce, 
    revise, or increase the grant award. The terms and conditions published 
    in the Request for Proposal (RFP) are binding and may not be modified 
    by any USIA representative. Explanatory information provided by USIA 
    that contradicts published language will not be binding. Issuance of 
    the RFP does not constitute an award commitment on the part of the 
    Government. Final awards cannot be made until funds have been fully 
    appropriated by the Congress, allocated and committed through internal 
    USIA procedures.
    
    Notification
    
        All applicants will be notified of the results of the review 
    process on or about April 28, 1995. Awarded grants will be subject to 
    periodic reporting and evaluation requirements.
    
    
    [[Page 3929]]
    
        Dated: January 11, 1995.
    Dell Pendergrast,
    Deputy Associate Director, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 95-1177 Filed 1-18-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/19/1995
Department:
United States Information Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice--Request for proposals.
Document Number:
95-1177
Dates:
Deadline for Proposals: All copies must be received at the U.S. Information Agency by 5 p.m. Washington, DC time on March 3, 1995. Faxed documents will not be accepted, nor will documents postmarked on March 3, 1995, but received at a later date. It is the responsibility of each grant applicant to ensure that proposals are received by the above deadline .
Pages:
3925-3929 (5 pages)
PDF File:
95-1177.pdf