95-1359. Form BD Amendments  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 12 (Thursday, January 19, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 4040-4063]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-1359]
    
    
    
    
    [[Page 4039]]
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    Part IX
    
    
    
    
    
    Securities and Exchange Commission
    
    
    
    
    
    _______________________________________________________________________
    
    
    
    17 CFR Part 249
    
    
    
    Form BD Amendments; Proposed Rule
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / 
    Proposed Rules 
    
    [[Page 4040]]
    
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    17 CFR Part 249
    
    Release No. 34-35224; File No. S7-2-95
    RIN 3235-AG25
    
    
    Form BD Amendments
    
    AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.
    
    ACTION: Proposed amendments to Form BD.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission is proposing amendments 
    to Form BD, the uniform broker-dealer registration form under the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The proposed amendments are to 
    implement recommended changes to the Central Registration Depository 
    System, a computerized filing and data processing system operated by 
    the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. that maintains 
    registration information regarding broker-dealers and their registered 
    personnel. Specifically, the amendments are intended to facilitate 
    retrieval of disciplinary information through the redesigned Central 
    Registration Depository by eliciting more precise disclosure and 
    reorganizing items into categories. The changes to the disclosure 
    section of Form BD are consistent with changes to the analogous section 
    in Form U-4, the uniform form for registration of associated persons of 
    a broker-dealer. Other changes to Form BD are more technical in nature 
    and are intended to clarify certain information requests.
    
    DATES: Comments should be submitted on or before February 21, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted in triplicate to Jonathan G. 
    Katz, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, 
    N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. All comment letters should refer to File 
    No. S7-2-95. All comments received will be available for public 
    inspection and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 450 
    Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Belinda Blaine, Deputy Chief Counsel, 
    or Terry R. Young, Attorney, (202) 942-0073, Office of Chief Counsel, 
    Division of Market Regulation, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
    Fifth Street, N.W., Mail Stop 7-10, Washington, D.C. 20549.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Introduction
    
        The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') is 
    proposing several amendments to Form BD (``Form''),1 the uniform 
    application form for broker-dealer registration under the Securities 
    Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'').2 The proposed amendments 
    to Form BD respond to design updates to the Central Registration 
    Depository (``CRD'') system operated by the National Association of 
    Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD''). The CRD is a customized electronic 
    database that allows ``one-stop'' filing for broker-dealer registration 
    among the various state and federal regulators and that maintains 
    information relevant to a registrant's securities business.3 
    Applicants for broker-dealer registration file a single Form BD with 
    the NASD, which enters the information into the CRD system and then 
    electronically forwards the information to the Commission and 
    appropriate states for review.
    
        \1\17 CFR 249.501.
        \2\15 U.S.C. Secs. 78a et seq. Form BD was last amended in 
    Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31398 (Nov. 4, 1992), 57 FR 
    53261. Form BD also is used by the NASD and all of the states.
        \3\In Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31660 (Dec. 28, 1992), 
    58 FR 11 (``1992 Release''), the Commission, as part of its ongoing 
    effort to reduce the costs associated with broker-dealer 
    registration, joined the CRD system and adopted amendments to the 
    broker-dealer registration process. The 1992 amendments required, 
    among other things, that all broker-dealers, including government 
    securities broker-dealers, applying for registration with the 
    Commission on or after January 25, 1993, file Form BD with the CRD.
        Direct participation in the CRD system has improved the 
    efficiency of the registration process by creating a comprehensive, 
    centralized database of all registrants, and by giving the 
    Commission more immediate access to current data in broker-dealer 
    filings. In addition, the new system has resulted in cost savings to 
    registrants, who no longer are required to make multiple filings 
    with the Commission, certain self-regulatory organizations 
    (``SROs''), and state regulators. See 1992 Release, at 58 FR 11.
        If the Commission adopts the amendments to Form BD, the 
    Commission, at the same time, will adopt technical amendments to the 
    registration rules to remove obsolete instructions. For example, 
    Commission Rules 15b3-1 (17 CFR 240.15b3-1) and 15b6-1 (17 CFR 
    240.15b6-1) currently contain temporary filing instructions for the 
    CRD that are obsolete and will be removed.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Currently, the CRD system is used primarily as a means to 
    facilitate broker-dealer registration with the Commission, certain 
    SROs, and all of the states. In order to keep pace with advancements in 
    information imaging and transmission, the NASD recently has initiated a 
    comprehensive plan to overhaul the CRD system. Under this plan, the CRD 
    system will be expanded beyond its principal function of facilitating 
    broker-dealer registration to enhance its regulatory use by the 
    Commission, SROs, and state securities regulators. Among other things, 
    the redesigned CRD system will allow federal and state securities 
    regulators to customize regulatory queries and reports. In addition, 
    the redesigned CRD system ultimately is intended to enable broker-
    dealers and their associated persons to file Form BD and Form U-4 
    registration information with the NASD electronically by direct link 
    with the CRD through a variety of methods, including computer-to-
    computer interface, network access, and standard dial-up access.4
    
        \4\According to the NASD, software will be developed to support 
    off-line personal computer or firm system entry of application 
    information. The new CRD system will include commentary screens that 
    can be attached to specific items to provide information to 
    applicants relating to the type or nature of the information being 
    requested. Clarification of disclosure information also may be 
    included with these commentary screens, including explanations of 
    certain terms.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        To allow the NASD sufficient time to redesign the CRD to permit 
    securities regulators to efficiently retrieve relevant information 
    through searches by subject category, the Commission is proposing 
    several amendments to Form BD. The proposed amendments are intended to 
    elicit more precise information from applicants by asking more specific 
    questions about an applicant's business. While the proposed amendments 
    would increase the number of questions on the Form, the Form will be 
    easier for applicants to complete because the specificity of the 
    questions will lessen the need for descriptive textual information.
        For instance, as discussed further below, the proposed amendments 
    to the disclosure section, where most of the changes are proposed to be 
    made, would provide the Commission, SROs, and state securities 
    regulators with better information about a registrant's disciplinary 
    history by: (1) grouping disciplinary information into related 
    categories (e.g., criminal charges and convictions); and (2) 
    customizing the accompanying Disclosure Reporting Pages (``DRPs'') used 
    to disclose details of the disciplinary history. The changes to the 
    disciplinary section of the Form are consistent with changes to the 
    analogous section in Form U-4, the uniform form for registration of 
    associated persons of a broker-dealer, which have been approved by the 
    North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (``NASAA'') 
    and will be considered by the NASD's Board of Governors.5
    
        \5\NASAA approved amendments to Form U-4 at the 1994 NASAA 
    Spring Conference. After the NASD Board of Governors adopts proposed 
    amendments to Form U-4, they will be filed with the Commission 
    pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 
    Sec. 78s(b)(2)) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder (17 CFR 240.19b-4). 
    
    [[Page 4041]]
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the Commission is proposing new items to Form BD to 
    enhance the disclosure with respect to U.S. broker-dealers that have 
    foreign owners, broker-dealers that are affiliated with U.S. or foreign 
    banks, and broker-dealers that conduct securities activities on the 
    premises of financial institutions. Finally, the Commission is 
    proposing several technical amendments to Form BD.
        The amendments proposed by the Commission are the culmination of 
    discussions between the staff of the Commission, NASAA's Forms Revision 
    Committee, the NASD, the New York Stock Exchange, and representatives 
    of the securities industry. The proposed amendments are discussed below 
    in the order of significance.
    
    II. Proposed Amendments to Form BD
    
    A. Disciplinary History
    
        The principal changes to Form BD concern proposed amendments to 
    current Item 7. This item requests information about the disciplinary 
    history of the applicant and its control affiliates, including 
    information relating to statutory disqualifications,6 other 
    relevant history, and the applicant's financial soundness. Under the 
    proposed amendments, Item 7 will be renumbered as Item 11. Consistent 
    with proposed changes to Form U-4, new Item 11 will be reorganized to 
    group related information under four broad disclosure categories: 
    criminal, civil, regulatory, and financial. For example, in the 
    criminal disclosure section, the proposed amendments group pending 
    charges and final convictions, and separate the questions relating to 
    felonies and misdemeanors in order to elicit more precise information 
    from applicants and to facilitate the retrieval of such information 
    from the CRD.7 Moreover, in order to make the criminal history 
    disclosure more comprehensive and complete, military court convictions, 
    perjury, and conspiracy to commit certain misdemeanor offenses will be 
    added to Items 11A and B. At the suggestion of NASAA, settlement 
    agreements in investment-related civil actions brought against the 
    applicant or control affiliate by a state or foreign financial 
    regulatory authority will be added to Item 11H(1).
    
        \6\Sections 15(b)(4) and 15(b)(6) of the Exchange Act authorize 
    the Commission to deny registration to a broker-dealer if the 
    broker-dealer or an associated person of the broker-dealer has 
    engaged in the activities listed in those sections. 15 U.S.C. 
    Secs. 78o(b)(4) and (b)(6).
        Section 3(a)(39) of the Exchange Act cross-references the 
    activities enumerated in Section 15(b)(4) (B), (C), (D), (E), and 
    (G). Section 3(a)(39) generally provides that a person is subject to 
    a ``statutory disqualification'' if, among other things, that 
    person: has been expelled or suspended from membership in an SRO or 
    barred or suspended from association with an SRO member; has had his 
    or her registration or association denied or suspended by the 
    Commission or other appropriate regulatory agency; has willfully 
    violated the federal securities laws or aided, abetted, or 
    counselled others to do so; is permanently or temporarily enjoined 
    by a court from acting in any capacity within the securities 
    industry; has willfully made or caused to be made a false or 
    misleading statement of material fact in filings required by the 
    SROs; or has been convicted of any felony within the past ten years. 
    15 U.S.C. Sec. 78c(a)(39).
        \7\Current Item 7A(1) asks ``in the past ten years, has the 
    applicant or a control affiliate been convicted of or plead guilty 
    or nolo contendere (``no contest'') in a domestic or foreign court 
    to: (1) a felony or misdemeanor involving: investment or an 
    investment-related business; fraud, false statements, or omissions; 
    wrongful taking of property; or bribery, forgery, counterfeiting, or 
    extortion.'' Current Item 7G asks about pending proceedings. New 
    Item 11A would ask ``in the past ten years has the applicant or a 
    control affiliate: (1) been convicted of or plead guilty or nolo 
    contendere (``no contest'') in a domestic, foreign or military court 
    to any felony?; and (2) been charged with any felony?'' New Item 11B 
    would ask ``in the past ten years, has the applicant or a control 
    affiliate: (1) been convicted of or plead guilty or nolo contendere 
    (``no contest'') in a domestic, foreign or military court to a 
    misdemeanor involving: investments or an investment-related 
    business, or any fraud, false statements or omissions, wrongful 
    taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, 
    extortion, or a conspiracy to commit any of these offenses?; and (2) 
    been charged with a misdemeanor specified in 11B(1)?''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Currently, disclosure of bankruptcy proceedings has no time 
    limitation. Because bankruptcy is not a basis for statutory 
    disqualification under Sections 3(a)(39) and 15(b)(4) of the Exchange 
    Act,8 the Commission is proposing to require disclosure of 
    bankruptcy proceedings in Item 11I(1) only for those occurring in the 
    past ten years. Finally, technical amendments, such as revising the 
    instructions and renumbering several questions, are proposed.9
    
        \8\See supra note 6.
        \9\Under the amendments, current Items 7B (1) and (2) are 
    proposed Items 11H1 (a) and (b), respectively. Also, current Item 
    7D(6) will be renumbered as proposed Item 11F. Item 7D(6) currently 
    requests information about whether the applicant or control 
    affiliate's authorization to act as an attorney or accountant has 
    been revoked or suspended. New Item 11F will add federal contractor 
    licenses to this question. In addition, information requested in 
    current Item 7F, relating to whether a foreign government, court, 
    regulatory agency, or exchange has ever entered an order against the 
    applicant or control affiliate related to investments or fraud not 
    previously reported in other Item 7 questions, has been incorporated 
    into other questions in proposed Item 11. Finally, current Items 7H, 
    7I, and 7J are proposed as Items 11J, 11K, and 11I, respectively.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission also is proposing amendments to the corresponding 
    DRPs, which are required to be completed when an applicant answers in 
    the affirmative one of the disciplinary questions. Currently, Form BD 
    includes one generic DRP for all disciplinary history questions. The 
    proposed amendments would replace the single generic DRP with several 
    customized DRPs to reflect more accurately the different 
    classifications of disclosures that are required to be reported under 
    proposed Item 11. For example, the proposed Regulatory DRP will contain 
    specific sections that inquire into whether the applicant is or has 
    been suspended or barred. If the applicant answers in the affirmative, 
    the proposed DRP requires the applicant to specify the duration and 
    capacity affected (e.g., general securities principal, financial and 
    operations principal, or options trading) by the suspension or bar. 
    Moreover, the proposed Regulatory DRP, as well as the proposed Criminal 
    and Civil Judicial DRPs, group together, under the same part and on the 
    same page, final and pending disciplinary actions.
        Although these amendments may increase the number of DRPs to be 
    provided, they should not increase the cost and burden of filing Form 
    BD, unless an applicant has an extensive disciplinary history. As 
    discussed above, federal and state securities regulators will have 
    greater access to enhanced regulatory information maintained in the CRD 
    system and will be able to sort and retrieve disciplinary information 
    by category on a more timely and specialized, ad hoc basis. In 
    addition, the proposed new DRPs are largely the same as those recently 
    proposed to be added to Form U-4 by NASAA.
    
    B. Bank Securities Activities
    
        In recent years, banks have become increasingly active in selling 
    securities to the public.10 The Commission believes that most bank 
    sales of securities are being conducted through registered broker-
    dealers that are subsidiaries or affiliates of banks.11 The 
    
    [[Page 4042]]
    Commission, however, currently does not have the means to identify 
    accurately broker-dealers affiliated with U.S. or foreign banks. 
    Accordingly, in order to gather information that may be useful, for 
    example, in evaluating the scope and nature of bank securities 
    activities, and in conducting an effective inspection program of 
    broker-dealers selling securities on behalf of banks, the amendments 
    propose adding Item 10B. Proposed Item 10B will elicit information 
    concerning all financial institutions or organizations, including bank 
    holding companies, that control the applicant. Specifically, proposed 
    Item 10B asks whether the applicant is controlled, directly or 
    indirectly, by a bank holding company, national bank, state member bank 
    of the Federal Reserve System, state non-member bank, savings bank or 
    association, credit union, or foreign bank. If the applicant answers in 
    the affirmative, the applicant will be required to complete Section II 
    of proposed Schedule D,12 which requests general information about 
    the financial institution, such as name, type (e.g., bank holding 
    company), and business address.
    
        \10\See Testimony of Arthur Levitt, Chairman, U.S. Securities 
    and Exchange Commission, Concerning H.R. 3447 and Related Functional 
    Regulation Issues, Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and 
    Finance Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of 
    Representatives, April 14, 1994.
        \11\Presently, banks can structure their securities sales 
    operations in a number of different ways. First, banks may engage 
    directly in selling activities, outside the regulatory framework 
    established for broker-dealers under the federal securities laws. 
    Second, banks may conduct sales activities through subsidiaries or 
    affiliates registered with the Commission. Finally, banks may enter 
    into contractual arrangements with unaffiliated broker-dealers 
    (i.e., ``networking'' or ``kiosk'' arrangements), whereby the 
    registered broker-dealer sells securities and provides brokerage 
    services to bank customers on (and off) the bank's premises in 
    exchange for a percentage of the commissions earned.
        \12\See discussion infra part III.B.1.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        If the proposed amendments to Form BD are adopted, the Commission 
    proposes to delete these questions from Schedule I of Form X-17A-5, the 
    FOCUS report.13 Disclosure on Schedule I is required only at the 
    end of each calendar year, and, unlike the redesigned CRD system, is 
    incapable of being queried and sorted by special category.
    
        \13\In Securities Exchange Act Release No. 31398 (Nov. 4, 1992), 
    57 FR 53261, the Commission adopted an amendment to Schedule I of 
    Form X-17A-5 (the ``FOCUS'' report) to require registered broker-
    dealers to disclose their affiliations, if any, with U.S. banks. 
    Broker-dealers already were required to disclose their affiliations 
    with foreign banks.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition to identifying bank affiliated broker-dealers, the 
    amendments propose adding Item 12Y(1), which is intended to elicit 
    information concerning securities activities conducted on bank premises 
    by third-party broker-dealers.14 Specifically, proposed Item 
    12Y(1) will require an applicant to indicate whether it is involved (or 
    will be involved) in any networking, kiosk, or similar arrangement with 
    a bank, savings bank or association, or credit union.
    
        \14\See supra note 11. Revised Item 12Y(2) also would ask 
    whether the applicant has entered into a networking arrangement with 
    an insurance company or agency. Insurance companies increasingly are 
    selling securities without registering as broker-dealers under 
    Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act through networking arrangements. 
    New Item 12Y(2) is proposed to assist the Commission, SROs, and 
    state securities regulators in conducting an effective examination 
    program to ensure that broker-dealers involved in networking 
    arrangements with an insurance company or agency are complying with 
    the federal securities laws, including certain conditions set forth 
    in staff no-action letters. See, e.g., Letters regarding: FIMCO 
    Securities Group, Inc. (July 16, 1993); Delta First Financial (Sept. 
    21, 1992); and The Wolper Ross Corporation (Oct. 16, 1991).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    C. Broker-Dealer Arrangements
    
        The Commission is proposing revisions to Item 8 in order to 
    simplify and clarify the question. Item 8A currently asks, in pertinent 
    part, ``does applicant have any arrangements with any other person, 
    firm or organization under which: (1) any of the accounts or records of 
    applicant are kept or maintained by such person, firm or organization; 
    or (2) the funds or securities of applicant or any of its customers are 
    held or maintained by such other person, firm or organization.'' Under 
    the proposed amendments, current Items 8A (1) and (2) will be revised 
    and separated out as Items 8A, 8B, and 8C. Item 8A will continue to 
    inquire about arrangements to maintain books and records. Items 8B and 
    C will ask about arrangements to maintain the accounts, funds, or 
    securities of the applicant, and the accounts, funds, or securities of 
    customers of the applicant, respectively.15
    
        \15\These items also have been reorganized because accounts 
    generally are associated with funds and securities, rather than with 
    records.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        While Item 8 contains a question that asks whether the applicant is 
    an introducing broker-dealer, it currently does not contain the same 
    question about clearing broker-dealers. Information about clearing 
    broker-dealers is important for regulatory purposes, including 
    identifying clearing broker-dealers that will be responsible for paying 
    certain transaction fees pursuant to Section 31 of the Exchange 
    Act.16 Accordingly, new Item 6 will be added to ask ``does 
    applicant hold or maintain any funds or securities or provide clearing 
    services for any other broker or dealer?''17
    
        \16\15 U.S.C. Sec. 78ee.
        \17\Because a clearing broker-dealer may provide such services 
    for multiple broker-dealers, details of clearing arrangements would 
    not be required to be provided by the clearing broker-dealer on 
    Schedule D.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    D. Instructions
    
        The Commission is proposing to add to the filing instructions of 
    Form BD an ``Explanation of Terms,'' containing definitions of the 
    following words: charged, order, felony, misdemeanor, found, minor rule 
    violation, and enjoined.18 The definitions contained in this 
    section are intended to assist applicants in responding to 
    disciplinary-related questions, and are consistent with the definitions 
    recently proposed to be added to Form U-4 by NASAA.
    
        \18\The proposed definitions are set out below:
        Charged: Being accused of a crime in a formal complaint, 
    information, or indictment (or equivalent formal charge).
        Order: A written directive issued pursuant to statutory 
    authority and procedures, including orders of denial, suspension, or 
    revocation; does not include special stipulations, undertakings or 
    agreements relating to payments, limitations on activity or other 
    restrictions unless they are included in an order.
        Felony: Includes a general court martial. For jurisdictions that 
    do not differentiate between a felony or misdemeanor, a felony is an 
    offense punishable by a sentence of at least one year imprisonment 
    and/or a fine of at least $1,000.
        Misdemeanor: Includes a special court martial. For jurisdictions 
    that do not differentiate between a felony or misdemeanor, a 
    misdemeanor is an offense punishable by a sentence of less than one 
    year imprisonment and/or a fine of less than $1,000.
        Found: Includes adverse final actions, including consent decrees 
    in which the respondent has neither admitted nor denied the 
    findings, but does not include agreements, deficiency letters, 
    examination reports, memoranda of understanding, letters or caution, 
    admonishments, and similar informal resolutions of matters. This 
    term is discussed in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 22468 
    (Sept. 26, 1985), 50 FR 41867.
        Minor Rule Violation: A violation of a self-regulatory 
    organization rule that has been designated as ``minor'' pursuant to 
    a plan approved by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission. A 
    rule violation may be designated as ``minor'' under a plan if the 
    sanction imposed consists of a fine of $2,500 or less, and if the 
    sanctioned person does not contest the fine. This term is discussed 
    in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 30958 (July 27, 1992), 57 FR 
    34028.
        Enjoined: Includes being subject to a mandatory injunction, 
    prohibitory injunction, preliminary injunction, or a temporary 
    restraining order.
        In addition, the proposed amendments move current definitions, 
    such as control affiliate, investment or investment-related, foreign 
    financial regulatory authority, and proceeding to the section 
    containing the proposed ``Explanation of Terms.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    III. Proposed Amendments to the Schedules to Form BD
    
    A. Schedules A, B, and C--Direct and Indirect Ownership Disclosure
    
        The proposed changes revise Schedules A, B, and C to elicit more 
    relevant and accurate information concerning an applicant and its 
    control affiliates. Schedules A, B, and C currently require applicants 
    to disclose the identity of their executive officers, directors, 
    partners, and direct and indirect owners.19 In response to 
    
    [[Page 4043]]
    heightened interest in national treatment of foreign international 
    markets, including foreign ownership of U.S. broker-dealers,20 the 
    Commission is proposing to collect on Schedules A, B, and C information 
    concerning foreign ownership of U.S. broker-dealers.
    
        \19\Schedule A currently requires disclosure of all five percent 
    owners. Schedule B requires disclosure of all twenty-five percent 
    owners of direct owners, their twenty-five percent owners, and each 
    successive twenty-five percent owner of a twenty-five percent owner, 
    continuing up the chain of ownership until a reporting company is 
    reached. Similar provisions apply to limited partners that have 
    contributed twenty-five percent or more of a partnership's capital. 
    Schedule C is used to amend Schedules A and B.
        \20\For example, the Treasury Department, with the assistance of 
    the Commission, prepares, on a periodic basis, a study for Congress 
    entitled the National Treatment Study: Report to Congress on Foreign 
    Government Treatment of U.S. Commercial Banking and Securities 
    Organizations (Nov. 30, 1990) (``National Treatment Study''). This 
    report is required to include information about foreign ownership of 
    U.S. broker-dealers.
        In recent years, a growing number of broker-dealers with foreign 
    owners have applied for registration in the United States. In 1990, 
    foreign persons had equity interests of 25 percent or more in 
    approximately 130 registered broker-dealers. See National Treatment 
    Study at 86.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In some instances, because of their complex organizational 
    structures, U.S. applicants may not know or may not be able to obtain 
    detailed information regarding remote foreign owners. Accordingly, 
    rather than require applicants to provide on Schedule D detailed 
    information concerning their foreign owners, which may be unavailable 
    to the applicant, the Commission is proposing to require only that the 
    applicant check a box on Schedules A and B to indicate if an owner is a 
    domestic entity, an entity incorporated or domiciled in a foreign 
    country, or an individual.
    
    B. Other Schedules
    
    1. Schedule D--Miscellaneous Disclosure
        The proposed amendments restructure the contents and increase the 
    specificity of the information required to be reported on Schedule D, 
    which currently requires disclosure of details relating to Items 1C(2), 
    5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12Z, and 13B. Descriptions of events resulting in an 
    affirmative answer to these Form items currently are set forth in free 
    form, non-structured text in Schedule D.21 In order to organize 
    this information into a format useful for electronic filing and 
    retrieving, Schedule D will be revised to add separate sections for 
    each Form item that requires applicants to disclose details of an event 
    or occurrence. For example, an applicant providing an affirmative 
    answer to Items 7 and 8, relating to introducing and clearing 
    arrangements, will be required to complete Section IV of proposed 
    Schedule D. Section IV will require the applicant to include the 
    clearing or custodial entity's name, business address, CRD number (if 
    applicable), and the effective and termination date of the arrangement.
    
        \21\For example, details regarding a succession reported under 
    Item 5 must be disclosed on Schedule D.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    2. Schedule E--Branch Office Disclosure
        The proposed amendments would add two new items to Schedule E, 
    which requires applicants to disclose information regarding all 
    business locations apart from the applicant's main office, including 
    the location and name of the supervisor of each branch office, and any 
    closing or opening of an office. The Commission is proposing amendments 
    to Schedule E that are designed to elicit information concerning branch 
    offices and other business locations that are considered by the broker-
    dealer to be franchised22 or that employ a significant number of 
    independent contractors engaging in securities activities.23 The 
    use of franchised branch offices or large numbers of independent 
    contractors raises concerns that such offices may not be properly 
    supervised and may be operating outside the scope of federal and state 
    securities laws.24 By identifying and monitoring so-called 
    franchised branch offices through disclosure in Schedule E, the 
    Commission and the SROs' examination and enforcement functions will be 
    enhanced.
    
        \22\Typically, in a franchise arrangement, the registered 
    broker-dealer allows the franchised office to use its broker-dealer 
    registration and its name to conduct a securities business in return 
    for a percentage of the commissions and fees generated from the 
    securities transactions executed by the franchised office. The 
    registered broker-dealer generally is not responsible under the 
    agreement for paying any of the operating expenses of the franchised 
    office, including licensing fees for registered representatives.
        \23\The designation of registered representatives as independent 
    contractors has no effect on a broker-dealer's responsibilities 
    under the federal securities laws, including Section 15(b) of the 
    Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. Sec. 78o(b)]. See, e.g., Letter regarding 
    Titan Capital Corporation (Sept. 30, 1988); and Hollinger v. Titan 
    Capital Corp., 914 F.2d 1564, 1572-76 (9th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 
    111 S.Ct. 1621 (1991).
        \24\Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act provides that it is 
    unlawful for a broker or dealer that is a person other than a 
    natural person to use the means of interstate commerce to effect 
    transactions in securities, unless such broker or dealer is 
    registered in accordance with Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act, or 
    unless an exemption applies. The registration requirements of 
    Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act apply only to brokerage firms 
    or natural persons not associated with a brokerage firm. Natural 
    persons associated with a broker-dealer are not required to register 
    separately as broker-dealers.
        Section 3(a)(18) of the Exchange Act defines ``associated person 
    of a broker or dealer'' in relevant part to mean ``any person 
    directly or indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common 
    control with such broker or dealer.'' Thus, under a franchised 
    branch office arrangement, where the branch manager and registered 
    representatives are not subject to the supervisory control of the 
    registered broker-dealer, they are not associated persons of such 
    broker-dealer, and accordingly the franchised branch office would be 
    required to register separately as a broker-dealer. See Roth v. 
    Securities and Exchange Commission, 22 F.3d 1108 (D.C. Cir. 1994), 
    Fed.Sec. L. Rep. para.98,206, cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 575 (1994) 
    (upholding the Commission's interpretation of Section 15(a) of the 
    Exchange Act that the exclusion from registration for associated 
    persons of a broker-dealer only applies to the extent associated 
    persons act within the scope of their employment with a registered 
    broker-dealer and are subject to supervisory control of such broker-
    dealer).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Accordingly, the proposed amendment to Item 10 in Schedule E will 
    ask if a business location will operate pursuant to a written agreement 
    or contract (other than an insurance agency agreement)25 with the 
    main office, and the location: (a) assumes liability for its own 
    expenses or has its expenses paid by a party other than the applicant; 
    (b) has primary responsibility for decisions relating to the employment 
    and remuneration of its registered representatives; (c) deems 5% or 
    more of its total registered representatives to be ``independent 
    contractors'' for tax purposes; or (d) engages in separate market 
    making and/or underwriting activities.
    
        \25\Proposed Item 12Y(2) relates to securities activities of 
    broker-dealers that have networking arrangements with an insurance 
    company or agency. See supra note 14. The Commission requests 
    comment on whether insurance agency agreements should be required to 
    be disclosed in proposed Item 10 of Schedule E.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the amendments to Schedule E propose revisions to Item 
    5, which will require an applicant to provide the name of the financial 
    institution if the branch office or other business location occupies or 
    shares space within a bank, savings bank or association, or credit 
    union.
    
    IV. Other Proposed Amendments
    
        In addition to the substantive amendments to Form BD discussed 
    above, the Commission is proposing several technical amendments to the 
    Form. Item 1 will be revised to expressly inform applicants that branch 
    offices and other business locations from which an applicant may be 
    conducting business must be reported on Schedule E. Also, current Items 
    12 and 13, concerning government securities activities, will become a 
    subset of SEC registration under Item 2.26 In addition, the 
    proposed amendments renumber Item 3 as Items 3A and 3B. Proposed Item 
    3A adds limited liability companies as a choice of legal form of 
    organization the applicant may select. The proposed changes move 
    successor identification and effective date of succession information 
    currently in Item 5 to Schedule D. Finally, the amendments propose 
    clarifying changes to Item 6B, which requests disclosures of control 
    persons of the applicant.27
    
        \26\Proposed changes to Item 2 also remove the instruction ``if 
    any registration, license, or membership listed is of a restricted 
    nature, explain fully on Schedule D.'' The redesigned CRD system 
    will allow the Commission, SROs, and states to enter directly in the 
    CRD system any restrictions placed on an applicant's securities 
    business. 
    
    [[Page 4044]]
    
        \27\The amendments propose to renumber current Item 6B as Item 
    9B and make explicit that disclosure of financing through public 
    offerings, credit obtained in the ordinary course of business, or a 
    satisfactory subordination agreement, as defined under Rule 15c3-1 
    of the Exchange Act [17 CFR 240.15c3-1], is unnecessary.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    V. Request for Comment
    
        The Commission is soliciting comment on whether the changes to Form 
    BD described above will provide more meaningful information to the 
    Commission and other securities regulators without increasing the 
    regulatory burden on broker-dealers. The Commission further requests 
    comment on each of the changes to the Form. In particular, the 
    Commission request comment on whether the disclosure of bankruptcy 
    proceedings should be limited to ten years or some other period of 
    time, and whether proposed Item 10B (relating to bank affiliations) 
    covers the universe of bank-affiliated broker-dealers. The Commission 
    also requests comment on the definition of franchise office in Schedule 
    E. Electronic filing of Form U-4 currently is in the planning stages 
    and the Commission expects that, upon completion of the redesign, the 
    CRD system also will have the capability of accepting electronic filing 
    of Form BD. Thus, the system, when implemented, contemplates full 
    electronic filing of Form U-4 and Form BD. As noted above, the NASD 
    will ensure that all broker-dealers will have full access to electronic 
    filing facilities.28 The Commission therefore requests comment on 
    the feasibility of electronic filing of Form BD, and in particular, 
    whether electronic filing should be mandatory.
    
        \28\The NASD will provide access to electronic filing through 
    terminals and other means. See supra note 4 and accompanying text.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    VI. Effective Date
    
        The Commission anticipates that the proposed amendments to Form BD 
    will not become effective until the redesigned CRD system is fully 
    operational. The NASD, which will convert existing information to a new 
    format conforming to the redesigned CRD system, currently anticipates 
    that the initial phase of the redesigned CRD system will become 
    operational in early 1996. Details on how to file revised Form BD, if 
    adopted, will be determined when the CRD redesign is closer to 
    completion.
    
    VII. Effects on Competition and Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    Considerations
    
        Sections 23(a)(2) of the Exchange Act29 requires the 
    Commission, in adopting rules under the Exchange Act, to consider the 
    anticompetitive effects of such rules, if any, and to balance any 
    anticompetitive impact against the regulatory benefits gained in terms 
    of furthering the purpose of the Exchange Act. The Commission is 
    preliminarily of the view that the proposed amendments to Form BD would 
    not result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
    appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. The 
    Commission requests comment, however, on any competitive burdens that 
    might result from adoption of the form revisions described in this 
    release.
    
        \29\15 U.S.C. Sec. 78w(a)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the Commission has prepared an Initial Regulatory 
    Flexibility Analysis (``IRFA''), pursuant to the requirements of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act,\30\ regarding the proposed revisions to 
    Form BD. The IRFA indicates that the proposed revisions are intended to 
    respond to design updates to the CRD system by expanding it to serve as 
    an information resource allowing securities regulators to run reports 
    and retrieve information through searches by subject category, and by 
    enabling registrants to file Form BD electronically with the CRD 
    system. Thus, adoption of the proposed revisions to Form BD not only 
    will provide benefits to securities regulators in the retrieval of 
    information, but also will ease the burden of registration by future 
    registrants. The IRFA also indicates that the proposed revisions to 
    Form BD will decrease the cost and lessen the time required to register 
    for small broker-dealers that do not have an extensive disciplinary 
    history.
    
        \30\5 U.S.C. Sec. 603 (1990).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the IRFA indicates the proposed revisions ultimately 
    could impose an additional one-time reporting requirement on broker-
    dealers. The burden of this one-time reporting requirement, however, 
    will fall only on those broker-dealers that have an extensive 
    disciplinary history. Finally, because the proposed amendments 
    generally are intended to lessen the burden of registration, the IRFA 
    further indicates that small broker-dealers will be affected in the 
    same manner as other registrants. Thus, exempting small broker-dealers 
    from Form BD disclosures will be unwarranted.
        A copy of the IRFA may be obtained from Terry R. Young, Attorney, 
    Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Market Regulation, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Mail Stop 7-10, 
    Washington, D.C. 20549, (202) 942-0073.
    
    VIII. Statutory Basis
    
        15 U.S.C. Secs. 78o, 78q, 78w.
    
    List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 249
    
        Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities, Broker-
    Dealers.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, the commission is 
    proposing to amend Title 17, Chapter II, Part 249 of the Code of 
    Federal Regulations as follows:
    
    PART 249--FORMS, SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 249 continues to read in part as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 15 U.S.C. 78a, et seq., unless otherwise noted;
    * * * * *
        2. By revising Form BD (referenced in Sec. 249.501) to read as set 
    forth below:
    
        Note: Form BD does not and the revision will not appear in the 
    Code of Federal Regulations. The proposed revised Form BD is 
    attached as Appendix I to this document.
    
        3. By amending Schedule I to Form X-17A-5 (referenced in 
    Sec. 249.617) by removing Specific Instructions 19a, b & c and Question 
    19, redesignating Questions 20 through 24 as Questions 19 through 23, 
    and revising newly designated Question 19 to read as follows:
    
        Form X-17A-5
    * * * * *
        Schedule I
    * * * * *
        19. Respondent is an affiliate or subsidiary of a foreign broker-
    dealer.
    
        By the Commission.
    
        Dated: January 12, 1995.
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
    
    [[Page 4045]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.055
    
    
    
    [[Page 4046]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.005
    
    
    
    [[Page 4047]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.006
    
    
    
    [[Page 4048]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.007
    
    
    
    [[Page 4049]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.008
    
    
    
    [[Page 4050]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.009
    
    
    
    [[Page 4051]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.010
    
    
    
    [[Page 4052]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.011
    
    
    
    [[Page 4053]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.012
    
    
    
    [[Page 4054]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.013
    
    
    
    [[Page 4055]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.014
    
    
    
    [[Page 4056]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.015
    
    
    
    [[Page 4057]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.016
    
    
    
    [[Page 4058]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.017
    
    
    
    [[Page 4059]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.018
    
    
    
    [[Page 4060]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.019
    
    
    
    [[Page 4061]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.020
    
    
    
    [[Page 4062]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.021
    
    
    
    [[Page 4063]]
    [GRAPHIC][TIFF OMITTED]TP19JA95.022
    
    
    [FR Doc. 95-1359 Filed 1-17-95; 9:36 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-C
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/19/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed amendments to Form BD.
Document Number:
95-1359
Dates:
Comments should be submitted on or before February 21, 1995.
Pages:
4040-4063 (24 pages)
RINs:
3235-AG25: Form BD Amendments
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/3235-AG25/form-bd-amendments
PDF File:
95-1359.pdf
CFR: (2)
17 CFR 249.617)
17 CFR 78s(b)(2))