96-545. Risk Assessment Prioritization (RAP) Program, Cycle 1 Completion  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 1434-1436]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-545]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 1435]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    [Docket No. PS-132; Notice 3]
    
    
    Risk Assessment Prioritization (RAP) Program, Cycle 1 Completion
    
    AGENCY: Office of Pipeline Safety, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA), 
    through it's Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) has just completed the 
    first generation of the Risk Assessment Prioritization (RAP) program. 
    The RAP program was developed to assist OPS in determining how to best 
    apply federal resources to pipeline safety issues using a risk based 
    approach. This public meeting is being held to discuss the RAP process, 
    review the RAP results and outline recommendations for improving RAP 
    for the next cycle.
    
    DATES: The public meeting will be held on Thursday January 25, 1996. 
    The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and conclude at 3 p.m.
    
    ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites, 7640 
    N.W. Tiffany Springs Parkway, Kansas City, Missouri 64154 in the Salon 
    Room. The telephone number to the Embassy Suites is 816-891-7788.
        Individuals not able to attend the public meeting can send comments 
    and recommendations on the RAP program to the docket listed above. This 
    docket will remain open for several months to ensure that all 
    interested parties can comment. Send comments in duplicate to the 
    Dockets Units, Room 8421, Research and Special Programs Administration, 
    U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW, Washington, 
    DC 29590. Identify the docket and notice number stated in the heading 
    of this notice. All comments and docketed material will be available 
    for inspection and copying in room 8421 between 8:30 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
    each business day.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick J. Ramirez, (202) 366-9864 
    regarding the subject matter of this notice. Contact the Dockets Unit, 
    (202) 366-5046, for docketed material.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        OPS began the RAP process two years ago with the goal of gaining 
    better control of its agenda. OPS believes that having a structured 
    method of prioritizing resources based on risk will help it better 
    address Congressional mandates, National Transportation Safety Board 
    (NTSB) recommendations and National Association of Pipeline Safety 
    Representatives (NAPSR) resolutions. OPS began the RAP model 
    development by having several OPS meetings and one public meeting to 
    solicit input and ideas on the model and its usage. In October 1993, 
    OPS published the RAP model in the Federal Register (58 FR 51402, Oct. 
    1, 1993) along with a request for pipeline safety issues. The notice 
    generated nearly 500 issues from the government, industry, states, 
    public interests groups and the general public. OPS consolidated these 
    500 issues to 189 distinct issues and published a second Federal 
    Register notice (60 FR 7620, Feb. 8, 1995) in February 1995 requesting 
    solutions. This second notice generated 400 responses, again from a 
    wide range of pipeline safety interests.
        Each solution was evaluated and/or prioritized by three groups 
    consisting of the OPS regional directors, NAPSR/National Association of 
    Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) and OPS Technical Advisory 
    Committee members. In addition to having a functioning risk model, OPS 
    has a RAP database that holds all of the issues, solutions and 
    prioritized ratings.
        Government, industry and public representatives provided extensive 
    input to the RAP process which resulted in the ranked solutions and 
    recommendations that led to the action plan. The action plan represents 
    a significant step for OPS as it continues applying risk based business 
    methods.
    
    II. OPS Risk Based Action Plan
    
        The RAP results provide substantial validation for much of the FY-
    95 OPS agenda including the following areas, which will retain a high 
    level of OPS attention during FY-96:
         One-Call Systems. OPS will continue efforts in support of 
    passage of federal legislation applicable to all underground utilities 
    and operators. In addition, OPS will work to promote industry training 
    of employees responsible for one-call systems and increased awareness 
    and training of excavators. OPS will also work, along with its State 
    Representatives, to promote increased development and use of quick and 
    effective administrative enforcement of penalties for one-call 
    violations.
         Continue Rulemakings. OPS will continue the following 
    rulemakings:
         Installation of check valves or remote-operated valves on 
    liquid pipelines in all high risk areas to provide for rapid shutdown 
    of failed pipeline segments.
         Requiring periodic smart pigging in transmission pipeline 
    segments situated in high risk areas.
         Require qualification of pipeline personnel.
        Through Regulatory Reinvention Initiatives (RRI), OPS will continue 
    to identify ways of providing more flexibility within its regulations, 
    and reduce or remove costly requirements with little or no risk-
    reduction benefits. RAP identified the following RRI areas where 
    increased OPS attention is warranted:
         Use of Industry Standards. OPS will increase the use of 
    industry standards within its regulations and will continue the trend 
    of increased OPS participation on national consensus standard 
    development committees. Specifically, OPS will increase its efforts in 
    support of API committees addressing specification of pipeline 
    toughness, and will examine for incorporation within its regulations 
    API Standard 1117, Lowering In-Service Pipelines, and the API series of 
    standards concerning corrosion protection for tanks.
         Inspection procedures. OPS will strengthen its inspection 
    guidelines to properly evaluate the adequacy of cathodic protection 
    design, installation and monitoring.
         Drug and alcohol testing requirements. OPS will reconsider 
    current requirements and work to define the appropriate level of 
    testing commensurate with the risks being addressed.
         Requirements for clearing shorted casings. OPS will 
    develop more flexible guidance on the conditions and criteria for 
    clearing shorted casings.
         Plastic Pipe Technology. OPS will review its regulations 
    to ensure that they are consistent with current application of plastic 
    pipe technology, especially in the areas of joints and tracer wire.
        RAP outlined several technology advancement programs that OPS 
    should continue addressing. The following broad-based efforts will 
    include risk management programs and performance measures, pipeline 
    mapping, research and technology, training and data development:
         Risk Management Programs and Performance Measures. OPS 
    will continue to work closely with industry and other stakeholders to 
    develop risk management programs that can demonstrate equal or greater 
    levels of safety.
         Mapping Initiatives. OPS will continue its joint efforts 
    with industry to obtain better information concerning the location of 
    pipelines and their proximity to high risk population and environmental 
    areas.
         Research & Technology Development. OPS will continue to 
    promote the development of improved 
    
    [[Page 1436]]
    and more cost-effective smart in-line inspection tools, leak detection 
    systems, and line location technologies.
         De-Centralized Training. OPS will emphasize the use of 
    computer-based training and other mechanisms to provide cost-effective 
    training to state and regional inspectors.
         Improve Usefulness of Incident Data. OPS will work to 
    improve the quality and usefulness of its incident database system, 
    including facilitating collection of the data, making the data more 
    widely available, improving on-line analytical capabilities, and 
    developing ties to industry databases to support risk management 
    demonstrations, which will include making the industry databases 
    available to OPS and States.
        OPS will strengthen its interagency cooperative activities through 
    the following:
         Regulatory Jurisdictional Authority. OPS will increase 
    efforts with the Coast Guard, the Environmental Protection Agency, the 
    Minerals Management Service and others to clarify jurisdictions and 
    authorities. Specifically, OPS will address jurisdictional issues on 
    low stress lines pipelines and tanks.
         Pipeline Casings. OPS will work with the Federal Highway 
    Administration and the Federal Railroad Administration to investigate 
    the requirements for casings at highway and railroad crossings.
        The RAP process included all current mandates from the National 
    Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), National Association of Pipeline 
    Safety Representatives (NAPSR), and certain provisions of the FY88 and 
    FY92 Pipeline Safety Acts. While the RAP results indicate that several 
    of the mandates may require significant cost to implement, they also 
    offer the opportunity to provide appreciable risk reduction. OPS will 
    take a risk based approach to the following initiatives, allowing 
    operators opportunity to determine the circumstances and extent to 
    which these safety actions should be applied to mitigate consequences 
    of accidents.
         Require qualification of pipeline personnel.
         Require periodic smart pigging in transmission pipeline 
    segments situated in high risk areas.
         Install check valves or remote-operated valves on gas and 
    liquid pipelines in all high risk areas to provide for rapid shutdown 
    of failed pipeline segments.
        On the mandate to issue regulations requiring operators of natural 
    gas distribution systems to notify their customers with lines in which 
    excess flow valves (EFVs) are not required by law, but can be 
    installed, OPS has thoroughly considered the issue and is taking steps 
    to issue a rule requiring operators to notify customers about EFV 
    availability and to offer to install EFVs if the customer pays for the 
    installation. Additionally, OPS will be taking steps to develop 
    performance standards for any EFV installed on a service line.
        OPS will continue to develop and refine the RAP program through 
    future cycles and will make the database available to State pipeline 
    safety offices and other stakeholders upon request.
    
    III. Public Meeting Topics
    
        The public meeting will focus on the 5 following areas for 
    discussions:
         Overview of the RAP process
         Overview of the RAP results (OPS Action Plan)
         How issues and solutions were gathered and consolidated
         Recommendations for the next cycle
         Introduction to the RAP database
        Issues in Washington, DC on January 11, 1996.
    
    Richard B. Felder,
    Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
    [FR Doc. 96-545 Filed 1-18-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-60-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/19/1996
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of public meeting.
Document Number:
96-545
Dates:
The public meeting will be held on Thursday January 25, 1996. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and conclude at 3 p.m.
Pages:
1434-1436 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. PS-132, Notice 3
PDF File:
96-545.pdf