95-31555. Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; ADENOSCANRegister  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 73-74]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-31555]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    [Docket No. 95E-0303]
    
    
    Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
    Extension; ADENOSCAN
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
    regulatory review period for ADENOSCAN and is publishing this 
    notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the 
    determination because of the submission of an application to the 
    Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the 
    extension of a patent which claims that human drug product.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and petitions should be directed to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 
    1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health 
    Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
    Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
    Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
    and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
    that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
    the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
    device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
    review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
    product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
    amount of extension an applicant may receive.
        A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
    testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
    testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
    investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the 
    approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
    submission of an application to market the human drug product and 
    continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
    Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
    the actual amount of extension that the Commissioner of Patents and 
    Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
    subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
    was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
    period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase 
    and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
        FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product 
    ADENOSCAN (adenosine). ADENOSCAN is indicated as an 
    adjunct to thallium-201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients 
    unable to exercise adequately. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent 
    and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for 
    ADENOSCAN (U.S. Patent No. 5,070,877) from Medco Research, 
    Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in 
    determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a 
    letter dated September 25, 1995, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark 
    Office that this 
    
    [[Page 74]]
    human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that 
    the approval of ADENOSCAN represented the first permitted 
    commercial marketing or use of the product. Shortly thereafter, the 
    Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's 
    regulatory review period.
        FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
    ADENOSCAN is 2,688 days. Of this time, 768 days occurred 
    during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 1,920 
    days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were 
    derived from the following dates:
        1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
    Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: January 9, 
    1988. The applicant claims December 10, 1987, as the date the 
    investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However, 
    FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was January 9, 1988, 
    which was 30 days after FDA receipt of the IND on December 10, 1987.
        2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
    the human drug product under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act: February 14, 1990. The applicant claims February 9, 
    1990, as the date the new drug application (NDA) for 
    ADENOSCAN (NDA 20-059) was initially submitted. However, 
    while FDA records indicate that the applicant submitted NDA 20-059 on 
    February 9, 1990, FDA received the NDA on February 14, 1990, which is 
    considered to be the date the NDA was initially submitted.
        3. The date the human drug was approved: May 18, 1995. FDA has 
    verified the applicant's claim that NDA-059 was approved on May 18, 
    1995.
        This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
    maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S. 
    Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in 
    its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
    application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 159 days of 
    patent term extension.
        Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published is 
    incorrect may, on or before March 4, 1996, submit to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) written comments and ask for a 
    redetermination. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA, 
    on or before July 1, 1996, for a determination regarding whether the 
    applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory 
    review period. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient 
    facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th 
    Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format 
    specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
        Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Dockets 
    Management Branch (address above) in three copies (except that 
    individuals may submit single copies) and identified with the docket 
    number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Comments and 
    petitions may be seen in the Dockets Management Branch between 9 a.m. 
    and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
        Dated: December 21, 1995.
    Stuart L. Nightingale,
    Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
    [FR Doc. 95-31555 Filed 12-29-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/02/1996
Department:
Health and Human Services Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
95-31555
Pages:
73-74 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95E-0303
PDF File:
95-31555.pdf