97-34202. Wasatch Powderbird Guides Outfitter and Guide Special-Use Permit, Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Salt Lake Ranger District, Salt Lake County, Utah and Uinta National Forest, Pleasant Grove and Spanish Fork Ranger Districts, Utah County, ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 50]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-34202]
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Notices
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
    or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
    and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
    delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
    statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
    appearing in this section.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 1998 / 
    Notices
    
    [[Page 50]]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
    
    Wasatch Powderbird Guides Outfitter and Guide Special-Use Permit, 
    Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Salt Lake Ranger District, Salt Lake 
    County, Utah and Uinta National Forest, Pleasant Grove and Spanish Fork 
    Ranger Districts, Utah County, Utah
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
    (EIS).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact 
    statement on Wasatch Powderbird Guides request for a five-year 
    outfitter and guide special-use permit for guided helicopter skiing 
    activities on National Forest Land.
    
    DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received 
    in writing by January 30, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Michael Sieg, District Ranger, 6944 
    South 3000 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84121.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Cruz, District Environmental 
    Coordinator, (801) 943-9483.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Wasatch Powderbird Guides, a current 
    ``Special Use Permit'' permittee, is proposing to operate a heli-skiing 
    operation for another five-years along the Wasatch Front of the 
    Wasatch-Cache and Uinta National Forests. This proposal includes 
    elements on both public and private lands. Elements include the landing 
    of helicopters to drop off and pick-up heli-skiers who are skiing 
    across both public and private land holdings. A complete description of 
    the proposal is available from the Salt Lake Ranger District. This 
    proposal was originally scoped in January 1997, since then it was 
    decided that there may be significant impacts, therefore an 
    environmental impact statement is being completed. A letter explaining 
    the decision to conduct an environmental impact statement, and 
    soliciting comments will be sent to nearly 300 individuals, 
    organizations and government agencies who responded to the original 
    scoping dated January 27, 1997. Individuals, organizations or other 
    government agencies may request a copy of the original scoping document 
    and/or send additional comments by writing to the Salt Lake Ranger 
    District.
        Issues identified since January 1997 include effects on public 
    safety, effects on Wilderness areas, effects of snowpack stability 
    testing on vegetation, effects on wildlife, including golden eagles and 
    threatened, endangered and sensitive species, effects on the economic 
    viability of Wasatch Powderbird Guides and the local economy and 
    effects to other winter recreationalists. Two preliminary alternatives 
    have been identified. The proposed action alternative would permit the 
    aforementioned heli-skiing operation with the following criteria: a 
    limit of 2 helicopters, a 5-year average of 2400 skier days per year, a 
    5-year average of 1200 skier days per year in the Tri-Canyon (Mill 
    Creek, Big, and Little Cottonwood Canyons) terrain and a 5-year average 
    of 1000 explosives per year. The No Action alternative would eliminate 
    helicopter skiing along the Wasatch Front and require a change to the 
    current Forest Plan. Other alternatives will look at use rotation 
    methods to reduce conflict between heli-skiing operations and other 
    winter recreationalists.
        The public is invited to submit comments or suggestions to the 
    address above. Comments received from individuals, groups and 
    government agencies received from the January 1997 scoping document 
    will be incorporated into this analysis. The responsible officials are 
    Bernie Weingardt and Peter Karp, Forest Supervisors. A draft EIS is 
    anticipated to be filed in May 1998 and the final EIS filed in 
    September 1998.
        The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will 
    be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency's notice 
    of availability appears in the Federal Register. It is very important 
    that those interested in this proposed action participate at that time. 
    To be the most helpful, comments on the draft environmental impact 
    statement should be as specific as possible and may address the 
    adequacy of the statement or the merits of the alternatives discussed 
    (see The Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
    the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
    40 CFR 1503.3).
        In addition, Federal court decisions have established that 
    reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
    participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
    meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewers' position and 
    contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
    533 (1978). Environmental objections that could have been raised at the 
    draft stage may be waived if not raised until after completion of the 
    final environmental impact statement. City of Angoon v. Hodel, (9th 
    Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 
    1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). The reason for this is to ensure that 
    substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
    Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to 
    them in the final.
    
        Dated: December 23, 1997.
    Michael Sieg,
    District Ranger.
    [FR Doc. 97-34202 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/02/1998
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
Document Number:
97-34202
Dates:
Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received in writing by January 30, 1998.
Pages:
50-50 (1 pages)
PDF File:
97-34202.pdf