95-1499. Sodium 5-Nitroguaiacolate, Sodium O-Nitrophenolate, and Sodium P- Nitrophenolate; Exemptions from the Requirement of a Tolerance  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 4095-4097]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-1499]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 180
    
    [PP 1F3986, PP 1F3987, and PP 1F3988/R2098; FRL-4928-6]
    RIN 2070-AB78
    
    
    Sodium 5-Nitroguaiacolate, Sodium O-Nitrophenolate, and Sodium P-
    Nitrophenolate; Exemptions from the Requirement of a Tolerance
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule establishes exemptions from the requirement of a 
    tolerance for residues of the biochemical plant regulators sodium 5-
    nitroguaiacolate, sodium o-nitrophenolate, and sodium p-nitrophenolate 
    in or on the raw agricultural commodities cottonseed, cotton gin 
    byproducts, rice, rice straw, soybeans, and soybean forage and hay when 
    products containing 0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.3% by weight of these active 
    ingredients, respectively, are applied at rates of 20 grams of each 
    active ingredient per acre or less per application in accordance with 
    good agricultural practices. These exemptions were requested by Asahi 
    Chemical Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective on January 9, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written objections and hearing requests, identified by the 
    document control number, [PP 1F3986, PP 1F3987, and PP 1F3988/R2098], 
    may be submitted to: Hearing Clerk (1900), Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Rm. M3708, 401 M St., SW., Washington DC 20460. A copy of any 
    objections and hearing requests filed with the Hearing Clerk should be 
    identified by the document control number and submitted to: Public 
    Response and Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division 
    (7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 
    401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring a copy of the 
    objections and hearing requests to Rm. 1132, CM #2, 1921 Jefferson 
    Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202. Fees accompanying objections shall be 
    labeled ``Tolerance Petition Fees'' and forwarded to: EPA Headquarters 
    Accounting Operations Branch, OPP (Tolerance Fees), P.O. Box 360277M, 
    Pittsburgh, PA 15251.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Leonard S. Cole, Jr., Acting 
    Product Manager (PM) 21, Registration Division (7505C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. Office location and telephone number: Rm. 227, CM 
    #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA 22202, (703) 305-6900.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA issued a notice, published in the 
    Federal Register of December 13, 1991 (56 FR 65080), which announced 
    that Asahi Chemical Manufacturing Co., Ltd., 500 Takayasu, IkarugaCho, 
    Ikoma-Gun, Nara Prefecture, Japan, had submitted pesticide petitions 
    (PP) 1F3986, 1F3987, and 1F3988 proposing to amend 40 CFR part 180 by 
    establishing a regulation pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and 
    Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371, to exempt from the requirement of 
    a tolerance the residues of the biochemical plant regulators sodium 5-
    nitroguaiacolate, sodium o-nitrophenolate, and sodium p-nitrophenolate 
    when applied at rates of 20 grams of active ingredient or less per acre 
    per application in or on the raw agricultural commodities from 
    application to cotton, rice, and soybeans.
        No comments were received in response to the Federal Register 
    notice.
        The data submitted in the petitions and all other relevant material 
    have been evaluated. The toxicological data considered in support of 
    the exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance include acute 
    toxicity tests, subchronic oral toxicity tests, developmental toxicity 
    studies, and mutagenicity studies. Acute toxicity tests place the end-
    use product in Toxicity Category IV. The acute toxicity tests for the 
    individual technical chemicals indicate that sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate 
    is in Toxicity Category I based on primary eye irritation, sodium p-
    nitrophenolate is in Toxicity Category II based on acute oral toxicity 
    and primary eye irritation, and sodium o-nitrophenolate is in Toxicity 
    Category II based on primary [[Page 4096]] eye irritation. Atonic is a 
    mild dermal sensitizer.
        Atonik, the end-use product, containing 0.3% sodium p-
    nitrophenolate, 0.2% sodium o-nitrophenolate, and 0.1% sodium 5-
    nitroguaiacolate by weight, was fed to rats in the subchronic oral 
    toxicity test at dietary levels of 0, 5,000, 15,000 and 50,000 parts 
    per million (ppm), which was equivalent to 515, 1,589, and 5,056 mg/kg/
    day for males and 531, 1,723, and 6,553 mg/kg/day for females. Based on 
    decreased weight gains, changes in hematology parameters, relative 
    organ weights of liver and kidney, and pigment accumulation in kidney 
    and spleen, the lowest-observed-effect level (LOEL) is approximately 
    1,600 mg/kg/day (1,589 and 1,723 mg/kg/day in males and females, 
    respectively). The no-observed-effect level (NOEL) is approximately 525 
    mg/kg/day (515 and 531 mg/kg/day in males and females, respectively).
        In a developmental toxicity study, Atonik was administered to rats 
    by gastric gavage at dose levels of 0, 100, 300, and 600 mg/kg/day. 
    Maternal toxicity was observed at the 600 mg/kg/day level, manifested 
    as significantly decreased body weight gain and food consumption. One 
    death at this dose level was considered to be treatment related. Based 
    on these results, the maternal toxicity NOEL and LOEL were 300 and 600 
    mg/kg/day, respectively. Developmental toxicity was not observed in 
    this study. The NOEL for developmental toxicity was 600 mg/kg/day, and 
    the LOEL was not determined.
        In mutagenicity studies, the individual active ingredients were 
    negative for mutagenicity when tested using the Ames Test, the Mouse 
    Micronucleus Assay, and the Mouse Lymphoma Assay.
        All of the toxicity studies submitted are considered acceptable. 
    The toxicity data provided are sufficient to show that there are no 
    foreseeable human or domestic animal health hazards likely to arise 
    from the use of these active ingredients as plant regulators in the 
    concentrations present in the end-use product and applied at rates of 
    20 grams of each active ingredient or less per acre.
        Acceptable daily intake (ADI) and maximum permissible intake (MPI) 
    considerations are not relevant to these petitions. Chronic exposure 
    data upon which ADI and MPI values are based are not required for 
    pesticides which are classified as biochemicals and applied at rates of 
    20 grams or less of each active ingredient per acre. Although the 
    individual active ingredients are acutely toxic in certain tests, the 
    end-use product containing the combined active ingredients at the 
    concentrations specified above was in the lowest toxicity category. At 
    application rates of 20 grams per acre or less, the level of active 
    ingredient which may be present in any of the food or feed items would 
    be far below levels which demonstrated any effects in the subchronic 
    oral toxicity test, developmental toxicity studies, and mutagenicity 
    studies. For example, in order to reach a dosage rate comparable to the 
    LOEL (1,600 mg/kg/day) obtained in the subchronic oral toxicity study, 
    it is calculated that a person weighing 50 kg would need to consume all 
    of the produce from 4 acres of crop every day.
        Because the tolerance exemption does not define a permitted residue 
    level in food, the requirement for an analytical method for enforcement 
    purposes is not applicable to this exemption request. This is the first 
    exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for the active 
    ingredients, sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate, sodium o-nitrophenolate, and 
    sodium p-nitrophenolate. By way of public reminder, this notice also 
    reiterates the registrant's responsibility under section 6(a)(2) of 
    FIFRA, to submit additional factual information regarding adverse 
    effects on the environment and to human health by these pesticides.
        These active ingredients are considered useful for the purpose for 
    which the exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance are sought. 
    Based on the information considered, the Agency concludes that 
    establishment of the exemptions will protect the public health. 
    Therefore, the regulation is established as set forth below.
        Any person adversely affected by this regulation may, within 30 
    days after publication of this document in the Federal Register, file 
    written objections with the Hearing Clerk, at the address given above. 
    40 CFR 178.20. The objections submitted must specify the provisions of 
    the regulation deemed objectionable and the grounds for the objections. 
    40 CFR 178.25. Each objection must be accompanied by the fee prescribed 
    in 40 CFR 178.27. A request for a hearing will be granted if the 
    Administrator determines that the material submitted shows the 
    following: There is a genuine and substantial issue of fact; there is a 
    reasonable possibility that available evidence identified by the 
    requestor would, if established, resolve one or more of such issues in 
    favor of the requestor, taking into account uncontested claims to the 
    contrary; and resolution of factual issue(s) in the manner sought by 
    the requestor would be adequate to justify the action requested. 40 CFR 
    178.32.
        Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), the 
    Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
    and therefore subject to all the requirements of the Executive Order 
    (i.e., Regulatory Impact Analysis, review by the Office of Management 
    and Budget (OMB)). Under section 3(f), the order defines 
    ``significant'' as those actions likely to lead to a rule (1) having an 
    annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely and 
    materially affecting a sector of the economy, productivity, 
    competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
    local or tribal governments or communities (also known as 
    ``economically significant''); (2) creating serious inconsistency or 
    otherwise interfering with an action taken or planned by another 
    agency; (3) materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement, 
    grants, user fees, or loan programs; or (4) raising novel legal or 
    policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's 
    priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.
        Pursuant to the terms of this Executive Order, EPA has determined 
    that this rule is not ``significant'' and is therefore not subject to 
    OMB review.
        Pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 
    (Pub. L. 96-354, 94 Stat. 1164, 5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Administrator 
    has determined that regulations establishing new tolerances or raising 
    tolerance levels or establishing exemptions from tolerance requirements 
    do not have an economic impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities. A certification statement to this effect was published in the 
    Federal Register of May 4, 1981 (46 FR 24950).
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedures, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: January 9, 1995.
    
    Stephen L. Johnson,
    Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    
        Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
        1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a and 371.
    
        2. In subpart D, by adding new Secs. 180.1139, 180.1140, and 
    180.1141, to read as follows: [[Page 4097]] 
    
    
    Sec. 180.1139   Sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate; exemption from the 
    requirement of a tolerance.
    
        The biochemical sodium 5-nitroguaiacolate is exempted from the 
    requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant regulator in end-use 
    products at a concentration of 0.1% by weight and applied at an 
    application rate of 20 grams of active ingredient per acre (20 g ai/A) 
    or less per application, in or on the raw agricultural commodities 
    cottonseed, cotton gin byproducts, rice, rice straw, soybeans, and 
    soybean forage and hay.
    
    
    Sec. 180.1140   Sodium o-nitrophenolate; exemption from the requirement 
    of a tolerance.
    
        The biochemical sodium o-nitrophenolate is exempted from the 
    requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant regulator in end-use 
    products at a concentration of 0.2% by weight and applied at an 
    application rate of 20 grams of active ingredient per acre (20 g ai/A) 
    or less per application, in or on the raw agricultural commodities 
    cottonseed, cotton gin byproducts, rice, rice straw, soybeans, and 
    soybean forage and hay.
    
    
    Sec. 180.1141   Sodium p-nitrophenolate; exemption from the requirement 
    of a tolerance.
    
        The biochemical sodium p-nitrophenolate is exempted from the 
    requirement of a tolerance when used as a plant regulator in enduse 
    products at a concentration of 0.3% by weight and applied at an 
    application rate of 20 grams of active ingredient per acre (20 g ai/A) 
    or less per application, in or on the raw agricultural commodities 
    cottonseed, cotton gin by-products, rice, rice straw, soybeans and 
    soybean forage and hay.
    
    [FR Doc. 95-1499 Filed 1-19-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/9/1995
Published:
01/20/1995
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
95-1499
Dates:
Effective on January 9, 1995.
Pages:
4095-4097 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PP 1F3986, PP 1F3987, and PP 1F3988/R2098, FRL-4928-6
RINs:
2070-AB78
PDF File:
95-1499.pdf
CFR: (3)
40 CFR 180.1139
40 CFR 180.1140
40 CFR 180.1141