98-1232. Notice of Availability of the Technical/Agency Draft Recovery Plan for the Spruce-Fir Moss Spider for Review and Comment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 2997]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-1232]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    
    Fish and Wildlife Service
    
    
    Notice of Availability of the Technical/Agency Draft Recovery 
    Plan for the Spruce-Fir Moss Spider for Review and Comment
    
    AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Document availability and public comment period.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the 
    availability for public review of the technical/agency draft recovery 
    plan for the spruce-fir moss spider (Microhexura montivaga). 
    Historically, at least five different mountain peaks in the Southern 
    Appalachian Mountains of western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee 
    are known to have supported populations of the spruce-fir moss spider. 
    Today, however, only two small relict populations of the spider are 
    known to survive--one on Grandfather Mountain in North Carolina and one 
    on Mount LeConte in Tennessee. The typical habitat of the spruce-fir 
    moss spider is found in well-drained moss mats growing on rocks and 
    boulders in well-shaded situations in mature high-elevation conifer 
    forests dominated by Fraser fir (Abier fraseri) and scattered red 
    spruce (Picea rubens). These factors are deteriorating rapidly, 
    primarily due to infestation and the resulting mortality of the fir by 
    the balsam woolly adelgid (an exotic insect pest) and possibly air 
    population and other factors now yet fully understood. The spider 
    requires situations of high and constant humidity, and the loss of 
    forest canopy, leading to increased light and decreased moisture on the 
    forest floor (resulting in desiccation of the moss mats), appears to be 
    the major threat to its continued existence. Unless new populations are 
    found or reestablished and existing population are maintained, this 
    species will remain in jeopardy of extinction for the foreseeable 
    future. The Service solicits review and comments from the public on 
    this draft plan.
    
    DATES: Comments on this technical/agency draft recovery plan must be 
    received on or before March 23, 1998 to receive consideration by the 
    Service.
    
    ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to review the technical/agency draft 
    recovery plan may obtain a copy by contacting the Asheville Field 
    Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 160 Zillicoa Street, Asheville, 
    North Carolina 28801 (Telephone 704/258-3939). Written comments and 
    materials regarding the plan should be addressed to the Field 
    Supervisor at the above address. Comments and materials received are 
    available on request for public inspection, by appointment, during 
    normal business hours at the above address.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Fridell, Fish and Wildlife 
    Biologist, at the address and telephone number shown in the Addresses 
    section (Ext. 225).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        Restoring endangered or threatened animals and plants to the point 
    where they are again secure, self-sustaining members of their 
    ecosystems is a primary goal of the Service's endangered species 
    program. To help guide the recovery effort, the Service is working to 
    prepare recovery plans for most of the listed species native to the 
    United States. Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for 
    the conservation of the species, establish criteria for recognizing the 
    recovery levels for downlisting or delisting them, and estimate time 
    and cost for implementing the recovery measures needed.
        The Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
    seq.) (Act), requires the development of recovery plans for listed 
    species unless such a plan would not promote the conservation of a 
    particular species. Section 4(f) of the Act, as amended in 1988, 
    requires that a public notice and an opportunity for public review and 
    comment be provided during recovery plan development. The Service will 
    consider all information presented during a public comment period prior 
    to approval of each new or revised recovery plan. The Service and other 
    Federal agencies will also take these comments into account in the 
    course of implementing approved recovery plans.
        The primary species considered in this draft recovery plan is the 
    spruce-fir moss spider (Microhexura montivaga). The area of emphasis 
    for recovery actions includes the Southern Appalachian Mountains of 
    western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee. Habitat protection, 
    reintroduction, and the preservation of genetic material are the major 
    objectives of this recovery plan.
    
    Public Comments Solicited
    
        The Service solicits written comments on the recovery plan 
    described. All comments received by the date specified above will be 
    considered prior to approval of the final plan.
    
    Authority
    
        The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered 
    Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
    
        Dated: January 6, 1998.
    Brian P. Cole,
    State Supervisor.
    [FR Doc. 98-1232 Filed 1-16-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-55-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
01/20/1998
Department:
Fish and Wildlife Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Document availability and public comment period.
Document Number:
98-1232
Dates:
Comments on this technical/agency draft recovery plan must be received on or before March 23, 1998 to receive consideration by the Service.
Pages:
2997-2997 (1 pages)
PDF File:
98-1232.pdf