99-1225. Importation of Fruits and Vegetables  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 20, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 2993-2995]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-1225]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Rules and Regulations
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
    having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
    to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
    under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
    
    The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
    Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
    week.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 1999 / 
    Rules and Regulations
    
    [[Page 2993]]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
    
    7 CFR Part 319
    
    [Docket No. 97-107-3]
    
    
    Importation of Fruits and Vegetables
    
    AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: We are amending the fruits and vegetables regulations to 
    declare certain areas in the Mexican States of Baja California Sur, 
    Chihuahua, and Sonora as fruit-fly-free areas. We are taking this 
    action based on our determination that these areas meet our criteria 
    for pest-free areas with regard to fruit flies. This action relieves 
    restrictions on the importation of certain fruits from those areas 
    while continuing to prevent the introduction of plant pests into the 
    United States.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: January 20, 1999.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald Campbell, Import 
    Specialist, Phytosanitary Issues Management Team, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 
    River Road Unit 140, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 734-6799; or E-
    mail: Ronald.C.Campbell@usda.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        The regulations in 7 CFR 319.56 through 319.56-8 (referred to below 
    as the regulations) prohibit or restrict the importation of fruits and 
    vegetables into the United States from certain parts of the world to 
    prevent the introduction and dissemination of fruit flies and other 
    injurious plant pests that are new to or not widely distributed within 
    and throughout the United States.
        The regulations at Sec. 319.56-2 (e)(4) provide for the importation 
    of certain fruits and vegetables from foreign areas that are determined 
    to be free of certain injurious plant pests under the criteria in 
    Sec. 319.56-2(f). Paragraph (h) of Sec. 319.56-2 lists areas in Mexico 
    that meet the pest-free criteria of Sec. 319.56-2(e) and (f) with 
    regard to certain fruit flies and includes a list of fruits that may be 
    imported from those areas without treatment for those fruit flies.
        On June 5, 1998, we published in the Federal Register (63 FR 30646-
    30655, Docket No. 97-107-1) a proposal to amend the regulations to list 
    a number of fruits and vegetables from certain parts of the world as 
    eligible, under specified conditions, for importation into the United 
    States and to amend Sec. 319.56-2(h) of the regulations to declare 
    additional areas in Mexico as free of certain fruit flies. We proposed 
    these actions at the request of various importers and foreign 
    ministries of agriculture and after conducting pest risk analyses that 
    indicated that these actions could be taken without significant risk of 
    introducing plant pests into the United States.
        We solicited comments concerning our proposal for 60 days ending 
    August 4, 1998. We received six comments by that date. They were from 
    representatives of industry and a State government. Four commenters 
    supported the proposed rule in its entirety; one commenter pointed out 
    an inadvertent omission from the proposed rule; and one commenter had 
    reservations about specific provisions of the proposed rule. One of the 
    concerns expressed by the commenter having reservations pertained to 
    the proposed amendment of Sec. 319.56-2(h) to declare additional areas 
    in Mexico as free of fruit flies. Because we believed that this issue 
    warranted further review and consideration, we published a final rule 
    on November 30, 1998 (63 FR 65650-65657, Docket No. 97-107-2), 
    concerning all portions of our June 5, 1998, proposed rule except the 
    portion concerning additional fruit-fly-free areas in Mexico.
        We have now completed our review of the data concerning the 
    proposed fruit-fly-free areas in Mexico and are proceeding with a final 
    rule on that issue. Our discussion of the two comments received 
    pertaining to this issue follows:
        Comment: The expansion of the fruit-fly-free zone in Mexico is 
    premature. Since May of this year, 30 Mexican fruit flies have been 
    trapped in Tijuana, and, once again, a Mediterranean fruit fly 
    population is building in the States of Chiapas and Tabasco. Mexico has 
    not provided any information on its plans to combat these populations. 
    Further, Mexican authorities have put the sterile Mexican fruit fly 
    release program on hold for lack of an appropriate release site.
        In addition, as of July 1997, the Animal and Plant Health 
    Inspection Service (APHIS) did not consider Chihuahua free of fruit 
    flies, and agency officials said that they would not do so until a pest 
    risk assessment was performed for each export commodity under 
    consideration. Have these assessments been submitted to and reviewed by 
    APHIS staff?
        Response: The three locations--Tijuana, Chiapas, and Tabasco--
    mentioned by the commenter as being associated with fruit flies are 
    separated by long distances or natural boundaries, such as mountains 
    and rivers, from the municipalities listed in the proposed rule for 
    recognition as being free of fruit flies. Further, Mexico's sterile 
    Mexican fruit fly release program applies to the Tijuana area only and, 
    therefore, is not a relevant issue for consideration in relation to the 
    fruit-fly-free areas in Baja California Sur, Chihuahua, and Sonora that 
    were proposed.
        Pest risk assessments have been performed for each export commodity 
    (i.e., apples, apricots, grapefruit, oranges, peaches, persimmons, 
    pomegranates, and tangerines) affected by declaring the municipalities 
    of Bachiniva, Casas Grandes, Cuahutemec, Guerrero, Namiquipa, and Nuevo 
    Casas Grandes in the State of Chihuahua as fruit-fly-free areas. In 
    addition, all of the municipalities declared in the proposed rule to be 
    fruit-fly-free areas in Mexico, including those municipalities in the 
    State of Chihuahua, provided APHIS with trapping data and information 
    on measures employed to prevent the establishment of fruit flies. This 
    information demonstrates that these areas meet the criteria in 
    Sec. 319.56-2 (e) and (f).1
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ Information on these pest risk assessments and the other 
    data referenced above may be obtained by writing to the person 
    listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or by calling the Plant 
    Protection and Quarantine fax vault at (301) 734-3560.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Comment: The municipality of Plutarco Elias Calles should have been
    
    [[Page 2994]]
    
    included in the list of municipalities in the State of Sonora proposed 
    as fruit-fly-free areas.
        Response: We agree. In the proposed rule, we neglected to correct 
    an out-of-date reference to the municipality of Puerto Penasco in 
    Sonora, Mexico. Puerto Penasco has been divided into two sections: 
    Puerto Penasco and Plutarco Elias Calles. Accordingly, we are adding 
    Plutarco Elias Calles to the list in Sec. 319.56-2(h).
        Therefore, for the reasons given in the proposed rule and in this 
    document, we are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule with the 
    change discussed in this document.
    
    Effective Date
    
        This is a substantive rule that relieves restrictions and, pursuant 
    to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, may be made effective less than 30 
    days after publication in the Federal Register. Immediate 
    implementation of this rule is necessary to provide relief to those 
    persons who are adversely affected by restrictions we no longer find 
    warranted. Therefore, the Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health 
    Inspection Service has determined that this rule should be effective 
    upon publication in the Federal Register.
    
    Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866. The rule 
    has been determined to be not significant for the purposes of Executive 
    Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed by the Office of 
    Management and Budget.
        In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed a Final 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, which is set out below, regarding the 
    impact of this rule on small entities. In our proposed rule, we invited 
    comments on the potential effects of the proposed actions. In 
    particular, we requested information on the number and kind of small 
    entities that may incur benefits or costs from the implementation of 
    the proposed rule. No comments were submitted. Based on the information 
    we have, there is no basis to conclude that adoption of this rule will 
    result in any significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
    small entities.
         Under the Federal Plant Pest Act (7 U.S.C. 150aa-150jj) and the 
    Plant Quarantine Act (7 U.S.C. 151-165 and 167), the Secretary of 
    Agriculture is authorized to regulate the importation of fruits and 
    vegetables to prevent the introduction of injurious plant pests. We are 
    amending the fruits and vegetables regulations to declare additional 
    areas in Mexico as fruit-fly-free areas. With the addition of new 
    fruit-fly-free areas in the Mexican States of Baja California Sur, 
    Chihuahua, and Sonora, the importation into the United States of four 
    types of fruit will be affected. These fruits are apple, orange, peach, 
    and tangerine. We project that increases in exports to the United 
    States of those fruits would be as follows: Apples, 4,000 metric tons; 
    oranges, 28,144 metric tons; peaches, 2,000 metric tons; and 
    tangerines, 280 metric tons. Import levels of apricots, grapefruits, 
    persimmons, and pomegranates--the other fruits eligible for importation 
    into the United States from Mexico under Sec. 319.56-2(h)--are not 
    expected to be affected by this rule.
        U.S. apple production in 1996 totaled 4,732,860 metric tons and was 
    worth $1.84 billion. Projected additional imports from Mexico of 4,000 
    metric tons represent less than 0.1 percent of U.S. production. 
    Further, the United States is a net exporter of apples, exporting more 
    than three times as many apples as it imports.
        U.S. orange production in 1996 totaled 10,634,920 metric tons and 
    was worth $1.895 billion. Projected additional imports from Mexico of 
    28,144 metric tons represent less than 0.3 percent of U.S. production. 
    In 1996, the quantity of oranges exported by the United States was 22 
    times greater than the quantity imported.
        U.S. peach production in 1996 totaled 938,940 metric tons and was 
    worth $378 million. Projected additional imports from Mexico of 2,000 
    metric tons represent about 0.2 percent of U.S. production. Further, 
    the United States is a net exporter of peaches, exporting 1.7 times as 
    many peaches as it imports.
        U.S. tangerine production in 1996 totaled 315,700 metric tons and 
    was worth $112 million. Projected additional imports from Mexico of 280 
    metric tons represent less than 0.1 percent of U.S. production. 
    Further, the United States is a net exporter of tangerines, exporting 
    six times as many tangerines as it imports.
        In the case of each of these four fruits, the amount of projected 
    additional exports to the United States due to the newly recognized 
    fruit-fly-free areas is extremely small compared to U.S. production. 
    Also, in each case, the United States is a net exporter of the fruit, 
    reflecting excess supply. Impacts on costs or prices for U.S. producers 
    and consumers are expected to be negligible. APHIS does not anticipate 
    any adverse effects on small entities or the ability of U.S. entities 
    to compete in domestic and export markets as a result of this rule.
    
    Executive Order 12988
    
        This rule reduces restrictions on the importation into the United 
    States of apples, apricots, grapefruit, oranges, peaches, persimmons, 
    pomegranates, and tangerines from specified fruit-fly-free areas of 
    Mexico. State and local laws and regulations regarding the importation 
    of those fruits imported under this rule are preempted while the fruits 
    are in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits and vegetables are generally 
    imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming public 
    and remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The 
    question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be 
    addressed on a case-by-case basis. No retroactive effect will be given 
    to this rule, and this rule will not require administrative proceedings 
    before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act 
    of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or 
    recordkeeping requirements included in this final rule have been 
    submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 
    When OMB notifies us of its decision, we will publish a document in the 
    Federal Register providing notice of the assigned OMB control number 
    or, if approval is denied, providing notice of what action we plan to 
    take.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
    
        Bees, Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Honey, Imports, Nursery stock, Plant 
    diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping 
    requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
        Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
    
    PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 150dd, 150ee, 150ff, 151-167, 450, 2803, and 
    2809; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.2(c).
    
        2. In Sec. 319.56-2, paragraph (h) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 319.56-2  Restrictions on entry of fruits and vegetables.
    
    * * * * *
        (h) The Administrator has determined that the following 
    municipalities in Mexico meet the criteria of paragraphs (e) and (f) of 
    this section with regard to the plant pests Ceratitis capitata, 
    Anastrepha ludens, A. serpentina, A. obliqua, and A. fraterculus: 
    Comondu,
    
    [[Page 2995]]
    
    Loreto, and Mulege in the State of Baja California Sur; Bachiniva, 
    Casas Grandes, Cuahutemoc, Guerrero, Namiquipa, and Nuevo Casas Grandes 
    in the State of Chihuahua; and Altar, Atil, Bacum, Benito Juarez, 
    Caborca, Cajeme, Carbo, Empalme, Etchojoa, Guaymas, Hermosillo, 
    Huatabampo, Navajoa, Pitiquito, Plutarco Elias Calles, Puerto Penasco, 
    San Luis Rio Colorado, San Miguel, and San Rio Muerto in the State of 
    Sonora. Apples, apricots, grapefruit, oranges, peaches, persimmons, 
    pomegranates, and tangerines may be imported from these areas without 
    treatment for the pests named in this paragraph.
    * * * * *
        Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of January 1999.
    Joan M. Arnoldi,
    Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-1225 Filed 1-19-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
1/20/1999
Published:
01/20/1999
Department:
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-1225
Dates:
January 20, 1999.
Pages:
2993-2995 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-107-3
PDF File:
99-1225.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 319.56-2(f)
7 CFR 319.56-2