97-1421. Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Emission Reduction Credit Banking Provisions; Implementation Plan for California State Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 3215-3216]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-1421]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    40 CFR Part 52
    
    [CA 157-0022a; FRL-5669-1]
    
    
    Clean Air Act Approval and Promulgation of Emission Reduction 
    Credit Banking Provisions; Implementation Plan for California State 
    Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the 
    California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revisions concern rules 
    from the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD or the 
    District). This approval action will incorporate these rules into the 
    federally approved SIP. The intended effect of approving these rules is 
    to control air pollution in accordance with the requirements of the 
    Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act) with regard to new 
    source review (NSR) in areas of MDAQMD that are not in attainment of 
    the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Thus, EPA is 
    finalizing the approval of these revisions into the California SIP 
    under provisions of the CAA regarding EPA action on SIP submittals, 
    SIPs for national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards 
    and plan requirements for nonattainment areas.
    
    DATES: This action is effective on March 24, 1997 unless adverse or 
    critical comments are received by February 21, 1997. If the effective 
    date is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal 
    Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the rules and EPA's evaluation report for the 
    rules are available for public inspection at EPA's Region IX office 
    during normal business hours. Copies of the submitted rules are 
    available for inspection at the following locations:
    
    Permitting Office (A-5-1), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 
    Agency, Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105
    Environmental Protection Agency, Air Docket (6102), 401 ``M'' Street, 
    SW., Washington, DC 20460
    California Air Resources Board, Stationary Source Division, Rule 
    Evaluation Section, 2020 ``L'' Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
    Mojave Desert AQMD, 15428 Civic Drive, Suite 200, Victorville, CA 
    92392-2383.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Ringer, Permitting Office (A-5-
    1), Air Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, 75 
    Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, Telephone: (415) 744-1260.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Applicability
    
        The rules being approved into the California SIP include: rule 
    1400, General; rule 1401, Definitions; rule 1402, Emission Reduction 
    Credit Registry; and rule 1404, Emission Reduction Credit Calculation. 
    These rules were adopted on June 28, 1995, and were submitted by the 
    State of California to EPA on August 10, 1995 (rules 1400, 1401, 1402, 
    and 1404 will hereafter be referred to as the ``submitted rules'').
        This document promulgates EPA's direct-final action for the 
    submitted rules. These submitted rules were found to be complete on 
    October 4, 1995, pursuant to EPA's completeness criteria that are set 
    forth in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V 1 and are being finalized for 
    approval into the SIP. The submitted rules establish a system by which 
    the District will calculate and bank reductions in emissions prior to 
    use as offsets for future increases in emissions.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\  EPA adopted the completeness criteria on February 16, 1990 
    (55 FR 5830) and, pursuant to section 110(k)(1)(A) of the CAA, 
    revised the criteria on August 26, 1991 (56 FR 42216).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Background
    
        The air quality planning requirements for nonattainment areas are 
    set out in 40 CFR 51.165. The general requirements for the use of 
    emission reductions are set out in EPA's Emissions Trading Policy 
    Statement (ETPS), at 51 FR 43814, December 4, 1986.
        Section 173 of the Clean Air Act requires that major new sources 
    and major modifications in nonattainment areas obtain offsetting 
    emission reductions as a part of the preconstruction permitting 
    process. The submitted rules create a system to provide for the banking 
    and transfer of such reductions. As detailed in 40 CFR 51.165 and EPA's 
    ETPS, offsets must reflect reductions in actual emissions, and they 
    must be enforceable, permanent, quantifiable, and surplus of other 
    regulatory requirements. For a description of how the submitted rules 
    ensure that emission reductions meet these requirements, please refer 
    to EPA's Technical Support Document (TSD) for this action.
    
    EPA Evaluation and Action
    
        EPA has evaluated the submitted rules and has determined that they 
    are consistent with the CAA, EPA regulations, and EPA policy. 
    Therefore, MDAQMD rules 1400, 1401, 1402, and 1404 are being approved 
    under section 110(k)(3) of the CAA as meeting the requirements of 
    section 110(a) and part D.
        Nothing in this action should be construed as permitting or 
    allowing or establishing a precedent for any future implementation 
    plan. Each request for revision to the State implementation plan shall 
    be considered separately in light of specific technical, economic, and 
    environmental factors and in relation to relevant statutory and 
    regulatory requirements.
        EPA is publishing this document without prior proposal because the 
    Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no 
    adverse comments. However, in a separate document in this Federal 
    Register publication, the EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision 
    should adverse or critical comments be filed. This action will be 
    effective March 24, 1997, unless, by February 21, 1997, adverse or 
    critical comments are received.
        If the EPA receives such comments, this action will be withdrawn 
    before the effective date by publishing a subsequent document that will 
    withdraw the final action. All public comments received will then be 
    addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this action serving as a 
    proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on 
    this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should 
    do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is 
    advised that this action will be effective March 24, 1997.
    
    Regulatory Process
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 600 et seq., EPA 
    must prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis assessing the impact of 
    any proposed or final rule on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
    Alternatively, EPA may certify that the rule will not have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small 
    entities include small businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises and 
    government entities with jurisdiction over a population of less than 
    50,000.
        SIP approvals under sections 110 and 301(a) and subchapter I, Part 
    D of the CAA do not create any new requirements, but simply approve 
    requirements that the State is already imposing. Therefore, because the
    
    [[Page 3216]]
    
    Federal SIP-approval does not impose any new requirements, I certify 
    that it does not have a significant impact on any small entities 
    affected. Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship 
    under the CAA, preparation of a regulatory flexibility analysis would 
    constitute Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of State 
    action. The CAA forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such 
    grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. E.P.A., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (S. 
    Ct. 1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410 (a)(2).
    
    Unfunded Mandates
    
        Under Sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform 
    Act of 1995 (``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 
    1995, EPA must undertake various actions in association with proposed 
    or final rules that include a Federal mandate that may result in 
    estimated costs of $100 million or more to the private sector or to 
    State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate.
        Through submission of this State implementation plan or plan 
    revision, the State and any affected local or tribal governments have 
    elected to adopt the program provided for under Part D of the Clean Air 
    Act. These rules may bind State, local, and tribal governments to 
    perform certain actions and also require the private sector to perform 
    certain duties. The rules being approved by this action will impose no 
    new requirements because affected sources are already subject to these 
    regulations under State law. Therefore, no additional costs to State, 
    local, or tribal governments or to the private sector result from this 
    action. EPA has also determined that this final action does not include 
    a mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to 
    State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate or to the private 
    sector.
        Under 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) as added by the Small Business 
    Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA submitted a report 
    containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, 
    the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the 
    General Accounting Office prior to publication of the rule in today's 
    Federal Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 
    U.S.C. 804(2).
        This action has been classified as a Table 3 action for signature 
    by the Regional Administrator under the procedures published in the 
    Federal Register on January 19, 1989 (54 FR 2214-2225), as revised by a 
    July 10, 1995 memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator for 
    Air and Radiation. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has 
    exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866 review.
    
    List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons, 
    Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, 
    Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
    
        Note: Incorporation by reference of the State Implementation 
    Plan for the State of California was approved by the Director of the 
    Federal Register on July 1, 1982.
    
        Dated: December 8, 1996.
    Felicia Marcus,
    Regional Administrator.
        Part 52, chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 52--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
    
    Subpart F--California
    
        2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(224)(i)(C) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 52.220  Identification of plan.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (224) * * *
        (i) * * *
        (C) Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District.
        (1) Rules 1400, 1401, 1402, 1404. Adopted on June 28, 1995.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 97-1421 Filed 1-21-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/24/1997
Published:
01/22/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule.
Document Number:
97-1421
Dates:
This action is effective on March 24, 1997 unless adverse or critical comments are received by February 21, 1997. If the effective date is delayed, a timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
Pages:
3215-3216 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CA 157-0022a, FRL-5669-1
PDF File:
97-1421.pdf
CFR: (1)
40 CFR 52.220